Religion is only a manifestation of our subconscious minds. In a way it is finding the truth and meaning of life but we are only human, we are unable to find the meaning. Why then does one find one religion better than the other? It suits his image better, it's part of his culture and tradition but it has nothing to do with facts. I don't believe in a God or higher force, that also must tell something about my subconsciousness and it doesn't mean I'm right.
Interestingly I used to belong to fundamentalist Christian group & we opposed the bill very strongly because we wanted to have the right to criticise other religions (you know, all the wrong ones). Thankfully I've left that place but I'm stll glad that bonkers bill didn't get passed.
@chingchong54 I was being sarcastic & also referencing Stewart Lee's Comedy Vehicle (where he jokes that if you are religious most of his material won't offend as at refers to other religions "you know, all the wrong ones").
What obviously transpires from this is that people are not open-minded and cannot take criticism. Well, as was said earlier, you don't have the right not to be offended. either you behave yourself with dignity or you go, like the fundamentalists, against everything that is not you. in the end, people really are afraid of what they do not understand (e.g. foreign religions). I am sorry, but if you say "tolerance" you must bear criticism.
I wince every time I hear someone use the phrase 'the Muslim community', which is often, since the news media seem to regard it as acceptable to refer to Muslims as though they are some sort of homogenous mass. It may sound picky, but language like this can create or reinforce a kind of psychological ghettoisation.
although at around 1:30 Mr. Harris says that criminal law should defend against racially motivated hate speech and he is wrong, the gov't and law has no place stopping or regulating any form of speech be it actuall constructive debate or racist hate speech every person has the right to say what they want and the kkk are people too (i'm sorry to say it), however he is right in saying that things like shouting fire in a theater is wrong this is true as it could DIRECTLY cause harm to others
I do think Stewart (who is brilliant) is a tad hypocritical here. Anil Gupta defends making fun of another religion then his own, because he knows enough about it to satirise it.
however, Stewart once said he wouldn't mock Islam because he doesn't belong to it culturally. C'mon every vaguely well read person knows enough about Islam to find it is as ridiculous as Christianity/Judaism. A twinge of white liberal guilt, perhaps? Surely, it's all fair game...
Well, you can, actually. We have freedom of speech in Norway, but uttering racist or otherwise hateful speech in public is illegal. It's working pretty well, and it's screwing up the wording of the conservative parties something awful:p
We have a similar law on Hate Speech, and that is the reason I consider the UK not to have free speech. That and the fact people have been arrested in the UK for protesting by reading out the names of the Iraq War Dead in London.
I hate what's happened to this country.
Check out Mark Thomas on here if you want to see how ludicrous the laws against protesting are here, You need a permit, a permit to protest lol, its gone way to far here.
Wow, that sounds pretty ludicrous... you can protest wherever you want here, at least.
From an idealistic point of view I agree entirely that everyone should be allowed to utter whatever message they want - but from a practical perspective, I can't really see the upside of political parties running under the banner of racism, or the legality of shouting "fire" in a theatre when there isn't one.
Unfortunately all the law has done is make the BNP and others try and ACT non racist.
As for the laws on protesting, If the home secretary decides somewheres out of bounds for a protest thats that, no protest! unless you wish to be arrested under Anti Terror laws.
the blasphemy law in england is so archaic and so rarely invoked the offence is essentially dormant especially in this day and age where Christianity is becoming less and less part of the fabric of our society. any threats of actions in blasphemy in this day and age are completely empty and any changes in law to the contrary (apart from the academic process of removing the current blasphemy law) would be pointless and pedantic and would open the floodgates to capricious claims left and right
How is religion a form of hatred? It's a guide to a way of life. Some people turn their religious fervour into hate, but hate is an emotion, religion is a system. A set of artificial rules is not the feeling of hatred.
Not of those things are hatred. A Fatwa is a ruling on a point of Islamic law by a recognized authority. The Inquisitition was a former tribunal of the Catholic Church. Forced conversions are that under threat of punishment. Witch trials (Salem, for example) are about lies and superstition. None of the things you mention have anything to do with hate. War is almost never actually about hating. Religion can't hate, only people can. Religion is not hatred. I'm an atheist, btw. And you are silly.
all of those things incite hatred, as does religion and other forms of division among human beings. if you think death threats and murder aren't connected to hatred and the stirring up of it, you are the one who's silly.
so, just out of interest, are you then saying that psychopathy and religion are mutually exclusive? it would appear that events over the whole of recorded history would suggest quite the contrary if read from an objective viewpoint. but then, objectivity and religion definitely ARE mutually exclusive.
No, no, of course not. Terrible people can be religious, certainly, however that doesn't make religion bad. It just means those people are bad. People often talk about how destructive religion is, but religion also inspires people to do great things. Some of the most beautiful music and art is religious. Great social change has been brought on by religious fervour. I'm saying religion isn't good or bad by itself, it takes people to make it that.
"Some of the most beautiful music and art is religious."
That's because a lot of it was sponsored by the churches who had the money. If you look at religious vs secular masterpieces throughout history you can clearly see this, especially pre/post Renaissance & Enlightenment. Then take into account the Inquisition's book burnings, or the sack of Alexandria's Library by Theodosius I & then Abr Ibn al 'Aas, or the Nazi book burnings. Art frequently not so much because of religion as despite it.
I agree with somerandomer. People should be able to believe whatever they want. They're even allowed to be offended. What Stephen is criticising is how some individuals (in the name of religion) prevent free speech through intimidation and violence, rather than religion itself.
Please. It's hardly likely anyone is going to bring down the Christian establishment, or prop it up, or actually affect anyone's belief or lack thereof one iota on a Youtube comments page. Why can't we just keep the comments relevant? This is not the place for rational debate, as I'm sure you all know. it astonishes me how seriously people take these comment pages as canvassing areas. It's so... pointless.
Mental isn't it...? Considering how secular the UK is it's amazing concepts such as blasphemy are even seriously discussed. It's what comes from there being no proper separation of church from state. Unfortunately this is only going to get worse when the buffoon that will be are next King gets to open his unelected and unwelcome mouth... :(
They were probably written to deliberately be hilariously hipocritical when we signed the international/european declaration of human rights to secur "free speech".
All Religion ever was, was neandathal mans science, then used as means of control, its all a cancer on society, man as not killed man for any other reason more so then Religion, it bourght us out of the caves only to drive us to our graves
sry but which repey was aimed at me theres so many, and inresonce to your stament, religion is and was Money and Poilitics. You could hide your motives on the above two in religion
(plz note the words you and your in the above parpgraph was ref to them and or they in a 3rd person sense and not to YOU)just incase you get confuesed
rights get the riot police to deal with them and end up kicking the shit into them all, but when a bunch of pissed off religious fanatics start trying to impeach free speech get government funding, its a mad world
Laws that suppress speech are an obviously terrible idea. It doesn't treat the sources of the problem, which are stupidity, narrow-mindedness, and hatred. Open speech gives us a place to examine our ideas and those of others. Only then can mutual understanding come about.
Another brilliant piece of work by Stewart Lee. The problem with Jerry Springer - The Opera, is that the people who liked it were rational, intelligent people, whilst those who took offense at it had nothing better to do than stand around in the rain outside theatres around the country heckling, and bullying theatre managers into cancelling the performances. Stupid people and zealots will always outnumber men like Stewart Lee. We mustn't listen to those who shout loudest in the greatest number.
Stewart Lee says he wants to ensure we have "greater social harmony". So he uses hatred to try and achieve this. You can fool some of the people, some of the time...
you obviously weren't aware of the media furore these groups kicked up, their hectoring, badgering behaviour, their desire to stop people seeing something that they themselves hadn't seen, the death threats Stewart Lee received. Yes, lovely peaceful people.
Then explain the death threats Stewart Lee received during this debacle. This controversy is all about power and the desire to crush freedom of thought and speech. I have nothing against religious people as a whole but the people in charge of religions are downright fascists.
people who are in charge of anything are often downright facists to a certain degree, power or influence of any kind will always tempt even the most noble to use it to there own ends the thing that makes dictators and good leaders different is the ability to decide to use power sparingly and wisely or better yet not at all
The solution to all the problems of mankind of for humans to stop thinking any kind of power or force can ever be moral. Even shouting fire in a theatre is not something that needs criminal prosecution lol. Anybody doing that would be permanently banned from the private premises and ostrescised from the community as a complete twat.
......"looked disturbingly like Paris Hilton" lol Alan moore knows the score
lordsofkoble 7 months ago
beware of the MUSLAMIC RAY GUNS
FrankBottazzo 10 months ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
If Mohammed existed, I'd be fucking his mother right now.
leave12 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Christians should be thrown to the lions
b0b1919 1 year ago
Religion is only a manifestation of our subconscious minds. In a way it is finding the truth and meaning of life but we are only human, we are unable to find the meaning. Why then does one find one religion better than the other? It suits his image better, it's part of his culture and tradition but it has nothing to do with facts. I don't believe in a God or higher force, that also must tell something about my subconsciousness and it doesn't mean I'm right.
Gwuba 2 years ago 6
Charles Manson was unavailable for comment at this time. ^ something 6.33
Cx
giNgkoC 2 years ago
Interestingly I used to belong to fundamentalist Christian group & we opposed the bill very strongly because we wanted to have the right to criticise other religions (you know, all the wrong ones). Thankfully I've left that place but I'm stll glad that bonkers bill didn't get passed.
gextvedde 2 years ago 7
how are other religeons wrong
maybey to other religions christianitity is rong
chingchong54 2 years ago
@chingchong54 I was being sarcastic & also referencing Stewart Lee's Comedy Vehicle (where he jokes that if you are religious most of his material won't offend as at refers to other religions "you know, all the wrong ones").
gextvedde 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
if you laugh at stewart lee's jokes, you're going to hell
moceanu 2 years ago
worth it
InsaneHotel 2 years ago 3
I'd rather go to hell than go to heaven with people like you.
Mesnesl 2 years ago 6
@moceanu Good. It'll be warm, and there will be people there I know.
Wickerbasket 6 months ago
What obviously transpires from this is that people are not open-minded and cannot take criticism. Well, as was said earlier, you don't have the right not to be offended. either you behave yourself with dignity or you go, like the fundamentalists, against everything that is not you. in the end, people really are afraid of what they do not understand (e.g. foreign religions). I am sorry, but if you say "tolerance" you must bear criticism.
Regenmacher175 2 years ago 4
I wince every time I hear someone use the phrase 'the Muslim community', which is often, since the news media seem to regard it as acceptable to refer to Muslims as though they are some sort of homogenous mass. It may sound picky, but language like this can create or reinforce a kind of psychological ghettoisation.
wouldacouldabuddha 2 years ago 5
although at around 1:30 Mr. Harris says that criminal law should defend against racially motivated hate speech and he is wrong, the gov't and law has no place stopping or regulating any form of speech be it actuall constructive debate or racist hate speech every person has the right to say what they want and the kkk are people too (i'm sorry to say it), however he is right in saying that things like shouting fire in a theater is wrong this is true as it could DIRECTLY cause harm to others
TheGr3mliin 2 years ago 3
Totally agree. If people want to be racist then they should be allowed to. Censoring will only cause more problems
HoosierMF 2 years ago
"Should've did?" Christ.
chalkey79 2 years ago
I do think Stewart (who is brilliant) is a tad hypocritical here. Anil Gupta defends making fun of another religion then his own, because he knows enough about it to satirise it.
however, Stewart once said he wouldn't mock Islam because he doesn't belong to it culturally. C'mon every vaguely well read person knows enough about Islam to find it is as ridiculous as Christianity/Judaism. A twinge of white liberal guilt, perhaps? Surely, it's all fair game...
grumpyyyyy 2 years ago 3
Im sure he was quoted as saying he wouldn't take the piss out of Islam cos he didnt wanna get killed.
I agree with your comment though you cant have partial free speech
Eldritchard 2 years ago
Well, you can, actually. We have freedom of speech in Norway, but uttering racist or otherwise hateful speech in public is illegal. It's working pretty well, and it's screwing up the wording of the conservative parties something awful:p
trallala 2 years ago 2
We have a similar law on Hate Speech, and that is the reason I consider the UK not to have free speech. That and the fact people have been arrested in the UK for protesting by reading out the names of the Iraq War Dead in London.
I hate what's happened to this country.
Check out Mark Thomas on here if you want to see how ludicrous the laws against protesting are here, You need a permit, a permit to protest lol, its gone way to far here.
Eldritchard 2 years ago
Wow, that sounds pretty ludicrous... you can protest wherever you want here, at least.
From an idealistic point of view I agree entirely that everyone should be allowed to utter whatever message they want - but from a practical perspective, I can't really see the upside of political parties running under the banner of racism, or the legality of shouting "fire" in a theatre when there isn't one.
trallala 2 years ago
Unfortunately all the law has done is make the BNP and others try and ACT non racist.
As for the laws on protesting, If the home secretary decides somewheres out of bounds for a protest thats that, no protest! unless you wish to be arrested under Anti Terror laws.
George Orwells spinning in his grave.
Eldritchard 2 years ago
Ah fuck, I pushed the 4 stars-key! This is so obviously a 5-star video! Ooops!:)
winterstellar 3 years ago 7
BLASPHEMY!
chrisp1nz 3 years ago 24
@chrisp1nz what is?
utar88utar 1 year ago
the blasphemy law in england is so archaic and so rarely invoked the offence is essentially dormant especially in this day and age where Christianity is becoming less and less part of the fabric of our society. any threats of actions in blasphemy in this day and age are completely empty and any changes in law to the contrary (apart from the academic process of removing the current blasphemy law) would be pointless and pedantic and would open the floodgates to capricious claims left and right
gossieuk 3 years ago 3
That's a good maxim: "I have the right not to be offended." It's not a legal right but simple logic. What a brilliant comic and a brilliant analyst.
ArchibaldClumpy 3 years ago 2
Who are the leaders of the "Muslim Community"?
Who votes for them?
Oh.... No-one.
RebelVoDKa 3 years ago 5
Religous Education: That was one of my fav. subjects. A whole peroid in which to do the homework for the subjects that actualy mattered like physics.
Eldritchard 3 years ago 5
You should've did English first ;) But yes, I agree with you. R.E. = good times for homework
meu02136 2 years ago
I got a bloody A level in english, My spellings appalling :|
Eldritchard 2 years ago 4
not to mention an oversight on apostrophe use sir;
spelling's.
I'm in pedantry corner tonight.
:-)
iain075 2 years ago
Religeous Hatred bill Hmmmmmm how ironicly named as Religeon is form of hatred
Eldritchard 3 years ago 8
How is religion a form of hatred? It's a guide to a way of life. Some people turn their religious fervour into hate, but hate is an emotion, religion is a system. A set of artificial rules is not the feeling of hatred.
Semiramiis 3 years ago
fatwas, holy wars (crusades, jews v muslims), witch trials, holy inquisitions, forced conversions. that's how religion is a form of hatred.
diefortacos 3 years ago
Not of those things are hatred. A Fatwa is a ruling on a point of Islamic law by a recognized authority. The Inquisitition was a former tribunal of the Catholic Church. Forced conversions are that under threat of punishment. Witch trials (Salem, for example) are about lies and superstition. None of the things you mention have anything to do with hate. War is almost never actually about hating. Religion can't hate, only people can. Religion is not hatred. I'm an atheist, btw. And you are silly.
Semiramiis 3 years ago
all of those things incite hatred, as does religion and other forms of division among human beings. if you think death threats and murder aren't connected to hatred and the stirring up of it, you are the one who's silly.
diefortacos 3 years ago
You've missed the point. All those things incite hatred, yes, but that doesn't connect hatred to religion at all. Just to psychopaths.
Semiramiis 3 years ago
so, just out of interest, are you then saying that psychopathy and religion are mutually exclusive? it would appear that events over the whole of recorded history would suggest quite the contrary if read from an objective viewpoint. but then, objectivity and religion definitely ARE mutually exclusive.
twitchyjohn 3 years ago
No, no, of course not. Terrible people can be religious, certainly, however that doesn't make religion bad. It just means those people are bad. People often talk about how destructive religion is, but religion also inspires people to do great things. Some of the most beautiful music and art is religious. Great social change has been brought on by religious fervour. I'm saying religion isn't good or bad by itself, it takes people to make it that.
Semiramiis 3 years ago
"Some of the most beautiful music and art is religious."
That's because a lot of it was sponsored by the churches who had the money. If you look at religious vs secular masterpieces throughout history you can clearly see this, especially pre/post Renaissance & Enlightenment. Then take into account the Inquisition's book burnings, or the sack of Alexandria's Library by Theodosius I & then Abr Ibn al 'Aas, or the Nazi book burnings. Art frequently not so much because of religion as despite it.
catalyst8 2 years ago 2
i dislike religion for other reasons but saying religion is a form of hatred is ridiculously small-minded. especially when you cant spell it
somerandomer 3 years ago 3
I agree with somerandomer. People should be able to believe whatever they want. They're even allowed to be offended. What Stephen is criticising is how some individuals (in the name of religion) prevent free speech through intimidation and violence, rather than religion itself.
p0lym0rph3 3 years ago
Beautifully put, sir. I shall be stealing that line and using it in many a drunken conversation from now on.
londonoverground 3 years ago
Bloody Blair and his religious schools. Thanks for inflicting your superstition on us, Tone.
KrisRamJ 3 years ago 8
Poor choice of language, but: Amen brother!
adamwebb1 3 years ago 6
My left nut is named Mohammed
moltenslag 3 years ago 48
What's the other one called?
pofacimo 3 years ago
@moltenslag Do you have 11 right balls called Khadijah bint Khuwaylid, Medina, Sawda bint Zamʿa, Aisha, Hafsa, Zainab, Umm Salama Hind, Rayhana, Zaynab bint Jahsh, etc?
cabaretampere 1 year ago
@moltenslag
My dick is named Jesus. It performs miracles.
aimonaali 10 months ago
@moltenslag
My dick is named Jesus. It performs miracles.
aimonaali 10 months ago
Please. It's hardly likely anyone is going to bring down the Christian establishment, or prop it up, or actually affect anyone's belief or lack thereof one iota on a Youtube comments page. Why can't we just keep the comments relevant? This is not the place for rational debate, as I'm sure you all know. it astonishes me how seriously people take these comment pages as canvassing areas. It's so... pointless.
dolphinio55 3 years ago 6
Blasphemy laws. That's amazing. There's a lot I don't know.
AbbeyNormal 4 years ago 5
Mental isn't it...? Considering how secular the UK is it's amazing concepts such as blasphemy are even seriously discussed. It's what comes from there being no proper separation of church from state. Unfortunately this is only going to get worse when the buffoon that will be are next King gets to open his unelected and unwelcome mouth... :(
RodHullIAmHim 4 years ago 5
They were probably written to deliberately be hilariously hipocritical when we signed the international/european declaration of human rights to secur "free speech".
rnbmeister 3 years ago
All Religion ever was, was neandathal mans science, then used as means of control, its all a cancer on society, man as not killed man for any other reason more so then Religion, it bourght us out of the caves only to drive us to our graves
ubernagash 4 years ago 4
More people have been killed for money and politics than religion.
The mongols killed 26 million chinese, and they didn't do it for religion. It was just population control.
maureenOWW 4 years ago
sry but which repey was aimed at me theres so many, and inresonce to your stament, religion is and was Money and Poilitics. You could hide your motives on the above two in religion
(plz note the words you and your in the above parpgraph was ref to them and or they in a 3rd person sense and not to YOU)just incase you get confuesed
ubernagash 4 years ago 3
Religion is the opiate of the masses...and like other opiates it can lead people to do stupid things while intoxicated.
perydwyn 4 years ago 6
all the protests about laws that strip us of our
rights get the riot police to deal with them and end up kicking the shit into them all, but when a bunch of pissed off religious fanatics start trying to impeach free speech get government funding, its a mad world
GhostVirusx90 4 years ago 2
Laws that suppress speech are an obviously terrible idea. It doesn't treat the sources of the problem, which are stupidity, narrow-mindedness, and hatred. Open speech gives us a place to examine our ideas and those of others. Only then can mutual understanding come about.
Stepper11 4 years ago 5
"Oh I absolutely believe in god,and I absolutely hate the fucker" (Richard B Ridick)
dogball123 4 years ago 8
"god's like that. he hates poofs."
lol, brilliant
macman13 4 years ago 8
You've got to be fucking kidding me, england still has BLASPHEMY LAWS?!?!?! Are we living in the 1400's?
macman13 4 years ago 4
It's stupid, but they're not as strict as they were then, the last man sent to prison for blashphemy was in 1922 for comparing Jesus to a clown :)
doorframehead 4 years ago 4
Jesus would have made a great clown, "For my next trick, I'm gonna turn this glass of water, into funk! (cue funky music)"
macman13 4 years ago 4
That's Family Guy :D
doorframehead 4 years ago 4
And they're only related to the church of England, I think, in the sense that the offence has to concern the state religion in particular.
(Though I'm not entirely sure, I just remember hearing it on the radio.)
dafyddoe 4 years ago
He wasn't a clown, he was a cunt. You heard, blasphemy freaks, I SAID HE WAS A FILTHY CUNT.
maureenOWW 4 years ago
well said
GhostVirusx90 4 years ago
Now just hold on a minute.
Jesus was quite clean.
ExMachine 4 years ago
Ah, yes, but his MIND was REALLY FUCKING FILTHY.
The real problem with Jesus was his fucking attitude...Imean, the guy wanted the fucking moon a stick.
YOU HEARD.
THE MOON ON A FUCKING STICK.
maureenOWW 4 years ago
At least he did his best. He had whores to wash his feet with their hair. Which is more than you can say for too many young men today.
ExMachine 4 years ago
Well many US States still ban the sale (OR USE!) of vibrators, and you can go to jail for anal sex (WITH YOUR WIFE) in some states!
Now THAT is fucking crazy lol...
maureenOWW 4 years ago 6
what a wonderful thing religion is. i myself am a roman catholic but dont argue for a second that religion certainly makes people do curious things.
boilerup1869 4 years ago 4
Another brilliant piece of work by Stewart Lee. The problem with Jerry Springer - The Opera, is that the people who liked it were rational, intelligent people, whilst those who took offense at it had nothing better to do than stand around in the rain outside theatres around the country heckling, and bullying theatre managers into cancelling the performances. Stupid people and zealots will always outnumber men like Stewart Lee. We mustn't listen to those who shout loudest in the greatest number.
portabledavros 4 years ago 8
Stewart lee is a genius.
quizzabella 5 years ago 5
Stewart Lee says he wants to ensure we have "greater social harmony". So he uses hatred to try and achieve this. You can fool some of the people, some of the time...
UnvarnishedTruth 5 years ago
I dont see him spewing hate, I see the protestors doing that.
TRWolf 5 years ago 3
No, don't make me watch it again. Are you talking about protestors standing peacefully with placards singing hymns?
This is what Stewart Lee has said on the subject, "One would like to think that comedy could incite religious hatred. That would be great."
UnvarnishedTruth 5 years ago
The funniest part is that you obviously dont "get" that, do you?
TRWolf 5 years ago 2
What don't I get?
UnvarnishedTruth 5 years ago
lol
TRWolf 5 years ago 2
you obviously weren't aware of the media furore these groups kicked up, their hectoring, badgering behaviour, their desire to stop people seeing something that they themselves hadn't seen, the death threats Stewart Lee received. Yes, lovely peaceful people.
Rumpio 4 years ago 4
'standing peacefully with placards singing hymns?' blocking the fucking pavement and making a racket, you mean?
I'd run them over with a JCB if I was given half a chance.
Oh, and you are a cuntflap. That's a scientific fact.
maureenOWW 4 years ago 2
Then explain the death threats Stewart Lee received during this debacle. This controversy is all about power and the desire to crush freedom of thought and speech. I have nothing against religious people as a whole but the people in charge of religions are downright fascists.
TulseLuper 3 years ago 8
people who are in charge of anything are often downright facists to a certain degree, power or influence of any kind will always tempt even the most noble to use it to there own ends the thing that makes dictators and good leaders different is the ability to decide to use power sparingly and wisely or better yet not at all
XxGradaKxX 3 years ago
The solution to all the problems of mankind of for humans to stop thinking any kind of power or force can ever be moral. Even shouting fire in a theatre is not something that needs criminal prosecution lol. Anybody doing that would be permanently banned from the private premises and ostrescised from the community as a complete twat.
davyjames 3 years ago 2
"we have no right not to be offended" - a good motto for anyone!
apollyon1 5 years ago
Yeah agreed i would have been arested for some of my veiws:) dam religious people annoy me.
phillippassmore 5 years ago 2
You ARE all that is comedy. Thanks very much for this. Didn't know it existed, yet I claim to be a steward lee fan.
JunkerJames 5 years ago
Oops. Stewart is spelt Stewart
JunkerJames 5 years ago