13:38 On this recording it really sounds like a missile, but believe me folks it was a jet! But there were also two explosions, the impact an 2-3 sec. later a 2nd explosion! This building wasn't indestructible, but something was wrong on this day! I mean, the speed of the collapse alone isn't possible!
There are so many witnesses. For some they wouldn't believe it even if Marvin Bush confessed to planting the explosives. Just looking at the video you can see this was clearly an explosion. A kerosene fire from airplanes would have burned all day but not collapsed the building in a matter of seconds. The real smoking gun is WTC7. 911=INSIDE JOB
This is all a bunch of hype set forth by people who always think there is some kind of conspiracy behind events like this. Any flamable liquid, heated to the point of vaporization will explode given adequate amounts of oxygen. Ever seen a grain silo explode? Fine grain dust, oxygen and static electricity all combine to create an explosion. Until somebody can come forth with bomb fragments or other tangeable evidence, I say B.S.! Theories are just that until they can be proven without doubt
@OTKBoots1....wtc 1, 2, and 7 are the ONLY steel framed structures to collapse due to fire in history, and this coincidentally happened less than 3 months after the owner of the wtc, larry silverstein, had taken out multi-billioninsurance clauses specifically covering terrorism. and even worse, george bush's brother was a high up executive for the company handling security for the wtc. this is simply too many coincidences to ignore.
@OTKBoots1....wtc 1, 2, and 7 are the ONLY steel framed structures to collapse due to fire in history, and this coincidentally happened less than 3 months after the owner of the wtc, larry silverstein, had taken out multi-billioninsurance clauses specifically covering terrorism. and even worse, george bush's brother was a high up executive for the company handling security for the wtc. this is simply too many coincidences to ignore.
Quick question: Where is the audio of controlled demolition explosives just seconds before the collapses? I need actual audio and video of such implosions going off.
Controlled demolition explosives don't go off and wait an hour before finally bringing the building down.
So what you're saying is you have no evidence and you're running on speculation. CD explosions don't go off an hour before collapse, I don't care how "covert" you're trying to be, it's just not logical or possible.
@wollclark Witnesses would lie? How could you not use this as evidence? Cops/Emts/firemen all said this happened. Last time I thought, Witnesses were a huge thing?y. I hope your not religous because everything you hear is a conspiracy, well ofcoarse, you meant jesus ;)
@wollclark Most microphones are set to pick up voices a few inches away & reduce background noise. That's why so many of videos of the second plane have voices on them that are louder than the explosion itself. However, some explosions have been recorded. Surely you've done a simple youtube search by now. You do understand what a "cover up" is don't you? "Hysterical witness testimony" ??? Witnesses are considered evidence by every court in the USA but they're not good enough for you?
Two giant jets went screaming into two giant skyscrapers. I'm pretty sure I'd be somewhat hysterical.
One chaotic situation with multiple witnesses will have somewhat different tellings of the same general story. Cases usually depend on multiple witnesses and try to link the stories to the most likely conclusion based on the physical evidence. If you had a crime with one witness and no evidence, that's not a solid case.
Here's more explosion testimonies: /watch?v=dizurbqG50U
Where's the proof that an explosion happened before the plane hit? He was inside at the time, was he not? And how does that apply to controlled demolition of which the explosions happen *just* before collapse? I've heard the audio of the second bang, but it sounds like something falling inside the building, maybe something falling in an elevator shaft.
Also, what's with the overly-dramatic music? It made it very hard to understand what he was saying most the time.
@wollclark I don't have all the answers. William Rodriguez is only one of many witnesses who've said there was an explosion in the basement before the plane even hit, some people thought it was in the subway. If ya don't believe the people who where there to know what they're talking about then keep believing the official version, you have the right to do that. I didn't create/upload the vid so I don't know about the music,
What about those firemen who were there who said building 7 would likely collapse from the fire damage? Do you believe they knew what they were talking about?
Also, just because I don't believe in what some witnesses say doesn't mean I automatically accept the official story. According to George Bush, it was done because "they hate our freedoms". When it was most likely due to our foreign policy with Israel.
@wollclark I can tell you that the steel core colums where removed & put on a ship to china before they could be investigated by anyone. FEMA & the fire dept weren't happy about that. Much of what has been saved was retrieved from a landfill.
I'm sure you can find info about that here on YouTube.
kerosene is not really explosive! it took a very hot spark to ignite, it is more like diesel! with petrol, I would imagine that it exploded in the elevator shafts, but jet fuel away for so long?
jet fuel seems like a plausible explanation until one sees the elevator diagrams. Also agree that on-air video right near the end the camera is definitely jolted by a boom before the plane hits, confirming the time difference in the audio right before it. How can they explain that away?
14:15 on the sneakers vid there is a thump and the vid gltches as if hit by a massive e.m.f. wave just prior to the plane impact sound. very interesting.
13:38 On this recording it really sounds like a missile, but believe me folks it was a jet! But there were also two explosions, the impact an 2-3 sec. later a 2nd explosion! This building wasn't indestructible, but something was wrong on this day! I mean, the speed of the collapse alone isn't possible!
74pbg 58 minutes ago
no explosives...all you people who truly believe this garbage are morons...simply put...morons
bengals101 1 month ago
Something dodgy about the Naudet brother. A film-maker didn't want to film those burning??.
offwiththefairies77 2 months ago
There are so many witnesses. For some they wouldn't believe it even if Marvin Bush confessed to planting the explosives. Just looking at the video you can see this was clearly an explosion. A kerosene fire from airplanes would have burned all day but not collapsed the building in a matter of seconds. The real smoking gun is WTC7. 911=INSIDE JOB
damienrockaterror 3 months ago
This is all a bunch of hype set forth by people who always think there is some kind of conspiracy behind events like this. Any flamable liquid, heated to the point of vaporization will explode given adequate amounts of oxygen. Ever seen a grain silo explode? Fine grain dust, oxygen and static electricity all combine to create an explosion. Until somebody can come forth with bomb fragments or other tangeable evidence, I say B.S.! Theories are just that until they can be proven without doubt
OTKBoots1 5 months ago
@OTKBoots1....wtc 1, 2, and 7 are the ONLY steel framed structures to collapse due to fire in history, and this coincidentally happened less than 3 months after the owner of the wtc, larry silverstein, had taken out multi-billioninsurance clauses specifically covering terrorism. and even worse, george bush's brother was a high up executive for the company handling security for the wtc. this is simply too many coincidences to ignore.
aemerson0425 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@OTKBoots1....wtc 1, 2, and 7 are the ONLY steel framed structures to collapse due to fire in history, and this coincidentally happened less than 3 months after the owner of the wtc, larry silverstein, had taken out multi-billioninsurance clauses specifically covering terrorism. and even worse, george bush's brother was a high up executive for the company handling security for the wtc. this is simply too many coincidences to ignore.
aemerson0425 5 months ago
yawn...."new stuff"
...what a crock of shit
robbopaloobop 5 months ago
@wollclark
the video with audio of explosions before building 7 fell exists. I have seen it here on Youtube.
People were directed to get out of the area by emergency personnel, so the audio of these explosions is minimallly represnted in people's videos.
But search for the evidence and you will find it.
kjcsinger 5 months ago
people seem to have released alot of new stuff, this is great
keflar5 6 months ago
Quick question: Where is the audio of controlled demolition explosives just seconds before the collapses? I need actual audio and video of such implosions going off.
Controlled demolition explosives don't go off and wait an hour before finally bringing the building down.
Hysterical witness testimony isn't evidence.
wollclark 6 months ago
@wollclark
This was meant to be done covertly. And it was.
Hysterical witness testimony?
CTV911 6 months ago 4
@CTV911
So what you're saying is you have no evidence and you're running on speculation. CD explosions don't go off an hour before collapse, I don't care how "covert" you're trying to be, it's just not logical or possible.
wollclark 6 months ago
@wollclark Witnesses would lie? How could you not use this as evidence? Cops/Emts/firemen all said this happened. Last time I thought, Witnesses were a huge thing?y. I hope your not religous because everything you hear is a conspiracy, well ofcoarse, you meant jesus ;)
Steelchamp060 5 months ago
@wollclark Most microphones are set to pick up voices a few inches away & reduce background noise. That's why so many of videos of the second plane have voices on them that are louder than the explosion itself. However, some explosions have been recorded. Surely you've done a simple youtube search by now. You do understand what a "cover up" is don't you? "Hysterical witness testimony" ??? Witnesses are considered evidence by every court in the USA but they're not good enough for you?
mrh785 1 month ago
@mrh785
Two giant jets went screaming into two giant skyscrapers. I'm pretty sure I'd be somewhat hysterical.
One chaotic situation with multiple witnesses will have somewhat different tellings of the same general story. Cases usually depend on multiple witnesses and try to link the stories to the most likely conclusion based on the physical evidence. If you had a crime with one witness and no evidence, that's not a solid case.
Here's more explosion testimonies: /watch?v=dizurbqG50U
wollclark 1 month ago
@wollclark watch?v=ugiZWPyaQio
mrh785 1 month ago
@wollclark watch?v=tvhXmJ_w9ZI
If ya don't already know.
mrh785 1 month ago
@mrh785
Where's the proof that an explosion happened before the plane hit? He was inside at the time, was he not? And how does that apply to controlled demolition of which the explosions happen *just* before collapse? I've heard the audio of the second bang, but it sounds like something falling inside the building, maybe something falling in an elevator shaft.
Also, what's with the overly-dramatic music? It made it very hard to understand what he was saying most the time.
wollclark 1 month ago
@wollclark I don't have all the answers. William Rodriguez is only one of many witnesses who've said there was an explosion in the basement before the plane even hit, some people thought it was in the subway. If ya don't believe the people who where there to know what they're talking about then keep believing the official version, you have the right to do that. I didn't create/upload the vid so I don't know about the music,
mrh785 1 month ago
@mrh785
What about those firemen who were there who said building 7 would likely collapse from the fire damage? Do you believe they knew what they were talking about?
Also, just because I don't believe in what some witnesses say doesn't mean I automatically accept the official story. According to George Bush, it was done because "they hate our freedoms". When it was most likely due to our foreign policy with Israel.
wollclark 1 month ago
@wollclark I can tell you that the steel core colums where removed & put on a ship to china before they could be investigated by anyone. FEMA & the fire dept weren't happy about that. Much of what has been saved was retrieved from a landfill.
I'm sure you can find info about that here on YouTube.
mrh785 1 month ago
@wollclark DEFENSE! DEFENSE! DEFENSE!
djundadawg 1 week ago
kerosene is not really explosive! it took a very hot spark to ignite, it is more like diesel! with petrol, I would imagine that it exploded in the elevator shafts, but jet fuel away for so long?
74pbg 7 months ago
jet fuel seems like a plausible explanation until one sees the elevator diagrams. Also agree that on-air video right near the end the camera is definitely jolted by a boom before the plane hits, confirming the time difference in the audio right before it. How can they explain that away?
thamnosma 7 months ago
14:15 on the sneakers vid there is a thump and the vid gltches as if hit by a massive e.m.f. wave just prior to the plane impact sound. very interesting.
lukusr 8 months ago
6:45 watch katie kouric tell the guy he was "confused and disoriented" and inserts the jet fuel explanation. slick shillery before your very eyes.
lukusr 8 months ago
Go viral.
WTC911demolition 8 months ago
what song at start?
sir4ki 8 months ago
@sir4ki sounds like the Braveheart soundtrack....
Theitisme400 8 months ago 3
@Theitisme400
Good stuff.
WTCdemolitions 8 months ago
@Theitisme400
I put almost the whole song in another video, 9/11 Debris: watch?v=QnnXTrw88P4 -- at 7:00
CTV911 8 months ago
@sir4ki its the braveheart song :D
abyssdnb 8 months ago