Certain isotopes are gridlocked or stripped in one direction. This means their weight depends on their orientation. Making crystals of those, enables us to tap energy from the Aether: You can create a gravity wheel by changing the orientation of those crystals at the top and bottom. F does not equal m*a anymore.
THE VIDEO IS GOOD BUT IT DOESNT MEAN YOU CAN APPLY IT TO WORK EXACTLY WHAT YOU SEE, ITS ONLY AN IDEA ,ADD SOMETHING TO IT THATS ACHALLENGE TO EVERYONE IF YOU HAVE IQ ITS ONLY NOW THAT I WATCH THIS AND I GOT AN IDEA THANKS TO THE VIDEO.
would it work if the balls where of steeland you put in stong magnets in the midle of the wheel so that the balls would move but they would still be atached to the midle of the weel ...?
on behalf of the ultra shit animation society we would like to offer you the lifetime achievment award. Its a special gold dildo shaped award and we have the time honoured tradition of shoving it up your ass. Congrats
@PunkntheGodfather : thank you, I would like to thank the shitty software that I used, along with the shitty OS that it was made for....without them, I would not be here accepting this award.
@sabriath there you go, bt it could only have been possible with your guiding shaking hand and total lack of vision, gracious and giving, also of course nominated in the 'bad workman always blames his tools' category. well done again and truly deserved.
@PunkntheGodfather : You were funny the first time, now you just sound like a douchebag. When you build houses with your hands, the houses tend to look like mud-huts or teepees...although still considered a "house," it is nowhere near good-looking as a mansion built with better tools. So yes, I am able to blame the tool considering it was my FIRST thing created in it, just as I can blame my $20 logitech webcam for the other shitty video I recorded. I don't have millions, nor the time to learn
I have been thinking about putting up a video that explains why permanent magnet motors and gravity wheels won't work. I have too many projects on my plate right now to fit it in.
Physics should be a mandatory class in school. There are multiple problems with the whole concept.
Any weight moving around a closed path will do at best zero work and normally will do negative work. The best analog is a roller coaster. There is no fancy track that will change the fact (magnets or not) all the energy gained from the first downhill section will be lost trying to go back up the last hill to start the next lap.
@subsystems : I took physics in school...in fact, I mentored some of the other students because they weren't getting it (13 or so years ago). If you took even 2 seconds to read some of the comments I had left, you would have noticed that this has nothing to do with science in a literal sense, but thanks for the view anyway. I can only imagine you are a troll searching through all youtube vids of "perpetual motion" and leaving your unneeded 2 cents on it.
@sabriath I actually didn't read the comments other than the description below the video. I was a paid by our college to tutor students in physics, math and electronics. I'm not trolling at all. The reason I posted is there are countless scammers posting videos where they claim to have invented a "free energy device". They claim to only need research money to develop the "science". They generally fall into a couple of categories, permanent magnet motors and gravity wheels.
@sabriath I wasn't trying to be rude for anything but since I understand why such devices will never be an energy source, I feel a certain responsibility to inform inventive people that there is a critical and valid reason not to get too caught up in time and money on devices like this.
I tried when I was 12 to build a gravity motor. I realized it would never work then. Over the past 35 years I have seen countless scams of this nature.
@chrisofnottingham : I didn't waste my time making a perpetual motion video....I used my time learning how to use a piece of recording software in a flipbook fashion. The "machine" happened by random circumstance and nothing more. I figured you would be one type of people to understand what it's like to "try new software," from your "trying to upload directly to youtube" video....but alas, just another chirping cricket.
@sabriath - animated perpetual motion machines all seem to work quite well. Because the animator knows nothing about basic physics. Make a real version and I'll bet you anything you like it won't work.
@LiamXaoh : I guess you couldn't tell the sarcasm in my previous reply...sorry. Read the other comments I left and you will see that I obviously know that this doesn't work. It's not always the end result that matters, but how we get there....this was about animation software.
@sabriath Well you assume that the wheel will rotate because there is more weight on the right side. But you need to connect the dots, so to speak, and that shape is the "moment of inertia". The irregular shape is essentially a oval, which does not rotate freely. Ignore the circular shape of the wheel, and just evaluate the weights, and the center of rotation. You should see that it would not rotate freely
@archon808 : I didn't assume anything...you are the one who assumed on my methods when you obviously have no idea what you are looking at. I'm the one who created the art and put the frames together for show, not as a proof. What you fail to realize is that the CONCEPT behind it is a material that would cause attraction without repulsion (like a one-way magnet), and be able to have blocking properties....none exist, the concept fails at that stage, not your "oval" idea.
@archon808 Draw a line that connects all the blue dots. Now visulize that shape relative to the center of rotation. You should see a sagging shape that would not cause any rotation. All the similar methods you see on the right panel of videos suffers the same result. I am not trying to insult you at all.
@archon808 : I know you are not insulting me, you insult yourself by making an observation that is false. The idea behind this particular drawing is that the red center is a "magnet" that pulls up on the left ball, which means that it's weight has no effect on the wheel....this makes 4 balls on the right and 3 on the left, given equal weights, that puts more weight on the right, causing it to turn. There is no such thing as a one-way magnet, nor does this have anything to do with oval shape.
@archon808 : How in the hell did I lose the argument? I just told you that there is "no such thing as a oneway magnet"....I KNOW THIS. This animation was not about the concept for a real proof at all....it was me fucking around with an animation software. I'm sorry if my abilities to put a few frames together to learn how to make a video put you in an evil state of mind.
Free energy technology exists!But the big oil corporations don't want that technology revealed,if you want a real Free energy Magnet Motor, get the blueprints at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,take part in the revolution!
and why the fucking hell do u upload such vids? - to show an illusion? - to make a magic trick? if u say u agree with then tell me why u upload a vid of thing that'll never work in 'real' life
it was damn 3 o'clock in the night ok, so I give a crap on my grammar
@metalltitan : I was practicing working with a slideshow video program, it had nothing to do with a "practical" PED....they don't exist, I know this.
However, science discoveries are usually by chance while working on other things....even though the PED devices don't work, they could POSSIBLY lead to other things that are practical (like a better frictionless motor use magnetic rings). You should step back and take a bigger look at the world instead of trolling comments.
u fools a perpetu mobile doesn't exsist and will NEVER exsist cuze it's physically not working put in some energy = endless motion is crap cuze the energy gets lost cuze what ever e.g. gravity or friction
@metalltitan : If you had read any of the comments, you would have seen that I agree with you. The energy required to put the object INTO the field is equal to the force given by the object when leaving the field....balancing the equation.
Next time you start ranting and calling people "fools," you might want to use proper grammar, otherwise you just look like a jackass....even if you were wrong to say it to begin with.
The pictures are still frames drawn in mspaint, then using another free software from microsoft that came with my operating system, I smashed the frames together to create this awesomely unachievable creation of filth, thanks for watching.
yes, I am a dick when it comes to people outlying the obviousness of a graphical drawing. It's as if I drew superman flying through the air and someone commenting "that's so fake". If SOMEHOW we humans find a material to completely negate the effects of emf, this design would work, but since no dampener exists, this design is a failure. Reading some of my other comments would've nudged him in the right direction, but alas, people just want to make fun of others to feel bigger.
When a magnet is placed close to any metalic object that can hold a charge, the object becomes temporarily magnetized in opposition of the magnet's polarity, making it attract each other. Trying to move the magnet while the copper wire is in attraction causes friction. You can do the same experiment by dropping a magnet down a metal tube, the magnet EVENTUALLY makes it to the end, but very very slowly.
the balls are made of something that magnets dont effect. make the wheel out of magnet and have it spin all around copper. or make the wheel out of copper and have it spin around magnets. either way u will probably create some decent electricity off that .
How about instead of attraction from the center you try repulsion from the 6 to 8 o'clock angles. Insead of inert iron ball, use magnets fastened on plastic radii slides. Then no need to worry about shielding.
The problem with it is that for an object to enter the field of repulsion prior to being repelled, takes force equal to the repulsion on the previous object, therefore being cancelled. Shielding is a dreamers concept that has yet to be found, if we find it, then it eleviates the "entry force" requirement, which will produce overunity...hence why it is just a dream concept. But good thinking!
I made 3 different wheels with the same idea. The magnetic force spills out and causes havoc with all the magnets. If we could only channel and pin point the energy for the magnet.
The impact would be counteracted by the next ball being lifted, but it wouldn't matter considering there is no material on the planet that can dampen magnetic field, only reduce it in entirety. thanks for the comment
it's a brilliant idea I believe it most work but I think that the gap of those magnets should be on the right upper side of the weel so that it can cut the power once gravity start pulling the balls down.
The red is the magnet, the black are only dampeners (similar to how lead dampens radiation). Although I already know it won't work, I was just bored and was playing around with olden day concepts. Thanks for the commment. =)
The idea is that the wheel is plastic or nonmetalic and surrounds the dampener without touching it at all (one-sided bearing). The dampener keeps the magnetic field only to the left side bottom, pulling the ball slightly up to cause an unbalance, once it spins around, new ball enters field...just a crude idea, I know it won't work =)
This has been flagged as spam show
Certain isotopes are gridlocked or stripped in one direction. This means their weight depends on their orientation. Making crystals of those, enables us to tap energy from the Aether: You can create a gravity wheel by changing the orientation of those crystals at the top and bottom. F does not equal m*a anymore.
Don't believe it? Check my channel, and you will.
Nomasain 3 weeks ago
Тут не хватает ограничительного кольца внутри системы (чтобы шарики не прилипали к магниту)
sasak0t 2 months ago
THE VIDEO IS GOOD BUT IT DOESNT MEAN YOU CAN APPLY IT TO WORK EXACTLY WHAT YOU SEE, ITS ONLY AN IDEA ,ADD SOMETHING TO IT THATS ACHALLENGE TO EVERYONE IF YOU HAVE IQ ITS ONLY NOW THAT I WATCH THIS AND I GOT AN IDEA THANKS TO THE VIDEO.
MrMt1600 2 months ago
This contraption if it is ever built will never work.
MrMalglish 2 months ago
would it work if the balls where of steeland you put in stong magnets in the midle of the wheel so that the balls would move but they would still be atached to the midle of the weel ...?
xtazy1337 6 months ago
on behalf of the ultra shit animation society we would like to offer you the lifetime achievment award. Its a special gold dildo shaped award and we have the time honoured tradition of shoving it up your ass. Congrats
PunkntheGodfather 7 months ago
@PunkntheGodfather : thank you, I would like to thank the shitty software that I used, along with the shitty OS that it was made for....without them, I would not be here accepting this award.
Thank you Troll
sabriath 7 months ago
@sabriath there you go, bt it could only have been possible with your guiding shaking hand and total lack of vision, gracious and giving, also of course nominated in the 'bad workman always blames his tools' category. well done again and truly deserved.
Now pls bend over : )
(huge troll applause, such a fitting tribute)
PunkntheGodfather 7 months ago
@PunkntheGodfather : You were funny the first time, now you just sound like a douchebag. When you build houses with your hands, the houses tend to look like mud-huts or teepees...although still considered a "house," it is nowhere near good-looking as a mansion built with better tools. So yes, I am able to blame the tool considering it was my FIRST thing created in it, just as I can blame my $20 logitech webcam for the other shitty video I recorded. I don't have millions, nor the time to learn
sabriath 7 months ago
@sabriath oh dont get me wrong you did a realy great job, and i mean that most sincerely
PunkntheGodfather 7 months ago
I have been thinking about putting up a video that explains why permanent magnet motors and gravity wheels won't work. I have too many projects on my plate right now to fit it in.
subsystems 9 months ago
@subsystems : well when you get around to doing that.....don't bother to tell me because I'm not interested in seeing the obvious.
sabriath 9 months ago
Physics should be a mandatory class in school. There are multiple problems with the whole concept.
Any weight moving around a closed path will do at best zero work and normally will do negative work. The best analog is a roller coaster. There is no fancy track that will change the fact (magnets or not) all the energy gained from the first downhill section will be lost trying to go back up the last hill to start the next lap.
subsystems 9 months ago 6
@subsystems : I took physics in school...in fact, I mentored some of the other students because they weren't getting it (13 or so years ago). If you took even 2 seconds to read some of the comments I had left, you would have noticed that this has nothing to do with science in a literal sense, but thanks for the view anyway. I can only imagine you are a troll searching through all youtube vids of "perpetual motion" and leaving your unneeded 2 cents on it.
sabriath 9 months ago
@sabriath I actually didn't read the comments other than the description below the video. I was a paid by our college to tutor students in physics, math and electronics. I'm not trolling at all. The reason I posted is there are countless scammers posting videos where they claim to have invented a "free energy device". They claim to only need research money to develop the "science". They generally fall into a couple of categories, permanent magnet motors and gravity wheels.
subsystems 9 months ago
@sabriath I wasn't trying to be rude for anything but since I understand why such devices will never be an energy source, I feel a certain responsibility to inform inventive people that there is a critical and valid reason not to get too caught up in time and money on devices like this.
I tried when I was 12 to build a gravity motor. I realized it would never work then. Over the past 35 years I have seen countless scams of this nature.
subsystems 9 months ago
@sabriath "I can only imagine you are a troll searching through all youtube vids of "perpetual motion" and leaving your unneeded 2 cents on it."
Says the loser who actually wasted his time making perpetual motion video.
chrisofnottingham 8 months ago
@chrisofnottingham : I didn't waste my time making a perpetual motion video....I used my time learning how to use a piece of recording software in a flipbook fashion. The "machine" happened by random circumstance and nothing more. I figured you would be one type of people to understand what it's like to "try new software," from your "trying to upload directly to youtube" video....but alas, just another chirping cricket.
sabriath 8 months ago
Comment removed
subsystems 9 months ago
Comment removed
subsystems 9 months ago
Wont work because the balls would cancel each other out on the sides. Even a 8 year old can tell you that.
wyrrox 11 months ago
@wyrrox : It totally would work!! Because if you read all of my other comments that I made, you would realize that!
I made this to test a still frame animation software.
sabriath 11 months ago
@sabriath - animated perpetual motion machines all seem to work quite well. Because the animator knows nothing about basic physics. Make a real version and I'll bet you anything you like it won't work.
LiamXaoh 10 months ago
@LiamXaoh : I guess you couldn't tell the sarcasm in my previous reply...sorry. Read the other comments I left and you will see that I obviously know that this doesn't work. It's not always the end result that matters, but how we get there....this was about animation software.
sabriath 10 months ago
@sabriath This method does not work, because the "moment of inertia" is a oval, so it will not rotate freely as you may expect.
archon808 9 months ago
@archon808 *stares blankly in your direction*
sabriath 9 months ago
@sabriath Well you assume that the wheel will rotate because there is more weight on the right side. But you need to connect the dots, so to speak, and that shape is the "moment of inertia". The irregular shape is essentially a oval, which does not rotate freely. Ignore the circular shape of the wheel, and just evaluate the weights, and the center of rotation. You should see that it would not rotate freely
archon808 9 months ago
@archon808 : I didn't assume anything...you are the one who assumed on my methods when you obviously have no idea what you are looking at. I'm the one who created the art and put the frames together for show, not as a proof. What you fail to realize is that the CONCEPT behind it is a material that would cause attraction without repulsion (like a one-way magnet), and be able to have blocking properties....none exist, the concept fails at that stage, not your "oval" idea.
sabriath 9 months ago
@archon808 Draw a line that connects all the blue dots. Now visulize that shape relative to the center of rotation. You should see a sagging shape that would not cause any rotation. All the similar methods you see on the right panel of videos suffers the same result. I am not trying to insult you at all.
archon808 9 months ago
@archon808 : I know you are not insulting me, you insult yourself by making an observation that is false. The idea behind this particular drawing is that the red center is a "magnet" that pulls up on the left ball, which means that it's weight has no effect on the wheel....this makes 4 balls on the right and 3 on the left, given equal weights, that puts more weight on the right, causing it to turn. There is no such thing as a one-way magnet, nor does this have anything to do with oval shape.
sabriath 9 months ago
@sabriath If you were right, you would be on TV!. But your machine does not work. So... your not. You lose this argument.
archon808 9 months ago
@archon808 : How in the hell did I lose the argument? I just told you that there is "no such thing as a oneway magnet"....I KNOW THIS. This animation was not about the concept for a real proof at all....it was me fucking around with an animation software. I'm sorry if my abilities to put a few frames together to learn how to make a video put you in an evil state of mind.
sabriath 9 months ago
I've seen static diagrams of such devices in books, but it was nice to see one that moved. Thanks for posting.
Fuliginosus 1 year ago
if it goes trough your mind then u better beleve it's possible otherwise u're waste
cris23dumi 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free energy technology exists!But the big oil corporations don't want that technology revealed,if you want a real Free energy Magnet Motor, get the blueprints at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,take part in the revolution!
violafinishda 1 year ago
what did you use to make this animation?
logancohen 1 year ago
and why the fucking hell do u upload such vids? - to show an illusion? - to make a magic trick? if u say u agree with then tell me why u upload a vid of thing that'll never work in 'real' life
it was damn 3 o'clock in the night ok, so I give a crap on my grammar
metalltitan 1 year ago
@metalltitan : I was practicing working with a slideshow video program, it had nothing to do with a "practical" PED....they don't exist, I know this.
However, science discoveries are usually by chance while working on other things....even though the PED devices don't work, they could POSSIBLY lead to other things that are practical (like a better frictionless motor use magnetic rings). You should step back and take a bigger look at the world instead of trolling comments.
sabriath 1 year ago
u fools a perpetu mobile doesn't exsist and will NEVER exsist cuze it's physically not working put in some energy = endless motion is crap cuze the energy gets lost cuze what ever e.g. gravity or friction
metalltitan 1 year ago
@metalltitan : If you had read any of the comments, you would have seen that I agree with you. The energy required to put the object INTO the field is equal to the force given by the object when leaving the field....balancing the equation.
Next time you start ranting and calling people "fools," you might want to use proper grammar, otherwise you just look like a jackass....even if you were wrong to say it to begin with.
sabriath 1 year ago
lol made on MS paint
MrVidManiacMilo 1 year ago
If the parts are in odd maybe the ball of top may do the diference for the imbalance...
We can´t forget this idea!
rlolli 2 years ago
whats that program
mrek94 3 years ago
The pictures are still frames drawn in mspaint, then using another free software from microsoft that came with my operating system, I smashed the frames together to create this awesomely unachievable creation of filth, thanks for watching.
sabriath 3 years ago
omg y is there a hotdog in the middle of it.... omg thats ur dick
ubtalking2jz 3 years ago
so funny that I have to keep it...you sir get a cookie for making me laugh.
sabriath 3 years ago
yay ill take it and put it next to ur hot dog and laugh at the size differential =)
ubtalking2jz 3 years ago
not gonna work
seankiara 3 years ago
no fucking duh...thanks for that comment, your advice has made me rethink my whole existence...thank you for that eye opener.
sabriath 3 years ago
lol your a dick he was just pointing out how dumb that idea was
iamtheunknown101 3 years ago
yes, I am a dick when it comes to people outlying the obviousness of a graphical drawing. It's as if I drew superman flying through the air and someone commenting "that's so fake". If SOMEHOW we humans find a material to completely negate the effects of emf, this design would work, but since no dampener exists, this design is a failure. Reading some of my other comments would've nudged him in the right direction, but alas, people just want to make fun of others to feel bigger.
sabriath 3 years ago
lol
iamtheunknown101 3 years ago
i thought magnets passing near copper was a frictionless event.
518schenectady 3 years ago
When a magnet is placed close to any metalic object that can hold a charge, the object becomes temporarily magnetized in opposition of the magnet's polarity, making it attract each other. Trying to move the magnet while the copper wire is in attraction causes friction. You can do the same experiment by dropping a magnet down a metal tube, the magnet EVENTUALLY makes it to the end, but very very slowly.
sabriath 3 years ago
the balls are made of something that magnets dont effect. make the wheel out of magnet and have it spin all around copper. or make the wheel out of copper and have it spin around magnets. either way u will probably create some decent electricity off that .
518schenectady 3 years ago
And how exactly is the wheel suppose to spin by itself while the copper wires act as friction to the magnets? Good try though.
sabriath 3 years ago
How about instead of attraction from the center you try repulsion from the 6 to 8 o'clock angles. Insead of inert iron ball, use magnets fastened on plastic radii slides. Then no need to worry about shielding.
seymour85202 3 years ago
The problem with it is that for an object to enter the field of repulsion prior to being repelled, takes force equal to the repulsion on the previous object, therefore being cancelled. Shielding is a dreamers concept that has yet to be found, if we find it, then it eleviates the "entry force" requirement, which will produce overunity...hence why it is just a dream concept. But good thinking!
sabriath 3 years ago
I made 3 different wheels with the same idea. The magnetic force spills out and causes havoc with all the magnets. If we could only channel and pin point the energy for the magnet.
EOGGasman 4 years ago
sounds good, but the ball also drops and on impact (during the climb up the left side) causes a force in the opposite direction desired.
shvey 4 years ago
The impact would be counteracted by the next ball being lifted, but it wouldn't matter considering there is no material on the planet that can dampen magnetic field, only reduce it in entirety. thanks for the comment
sabriath 4 years ago
i was thinking it was an air suction instead of a magnet.. thats really cool
gilluminati 4 years ago
You would think with the three energys from suction ( air pressure ) gravity & magnets we could make a motor.
EOGGasman 4 years ago
it's a brilliant idea I believe it most work but I think that the gap of those magnets should be on the right upper side of the weel so that it can cut the power once gravity start pulling the balls down.
rochy1432000 4 years ago
The red is the magnet, the black are only dampeners (similar to how lead dampens radiation). Although I already know it won't work, I was just bored and was playing around with olden day concepts. Thanks for the commment. =)
sabriath 4 years ago
Interesting. Won't the pull of the magnet on the ball create so much friction it slows the wheel down?
hoekf 4 years ago
The idea is that the wheel is plastic or nonmetalic and surrounds the dampener without touching it at all (one-sided bearing). The dampener keeps the magnetic field only to the left side bottom, pulling the ball slightly up to cause an unbalance, once it spins around, new ball enters field...just a crude idea, I know it won't work =)
sabriath 4 years ago
I'm assuming from your description that this is a side view of the device. Nice design.
technocreep 4 years ago
Yes, it's the side view, I'm still having huge problems with my camera, and I can't afford a new one right now...ug, frustrating!
sabriath 4 years ago