It's like I keep waiting for the song to get good -- kick into full motion swing -- but it never does. My favorite part was when my computer said, "It's 9'o clock", and I was disappointed because it wasn't part of the song.
Sure is funny to think there's only one of us here (really) and everything is the same thing (actually) and there's nothing nowhere no one can do to make it any different (truly). I laugh myself to pieces.
and if you don't like that stuff either, go and listen to something else. you don't have to get mad at Animal Collective and the people that listen to them.
@spicegirlsfan472 woah woah, the ONLY bundle of sticks i see here, IS YOU MR. SPICE GIRLS. lol seriously dude if you don't like the band get off the page and listen to the spice girls. don't come here and bad mouth people that listen to Animal Collective. a lot of their stuff is really, really good. if you don't like this, this is them being experimental and goofing around. they have really poppy, catchy stuff as well, if that is what you're into.
I have this on a plain white 7" (no etchings or writing) with Purple Bottle on the other side. This is an amazing cover, the strumming and voice have a lot of emotion in them. After listening to this and then the original right after, I like Animal Collective's version more because it's darker and I like the strumming more.
muddy banks of the wishkah version has much more intensity and emotion..... i like animal collective but i dont like this. respect for their attempt though
When someone does a cover, a good cover, the expectations are for the band/person to make it their own song pretty much. Animal Collective obviously did that.
AC is an amazing band, but I'd say they kind ruined this song. I love all of their music but this just wasn't one I enjoyed.
Calm down, everyone. I admit it's not the best version, but it's their interpretation of it. Obviously it's not going to sound exactly like Nirvana's, they're not even the same genre. Despite that, I will say - I understand they put their own little twist on it and whatnot, but it sucks. >_>
eh, some people don't like to be challenged by music. Mistake pop sensibility for quality. Would rather be entertained than actively contemplate what they are hearing.
i respect that they r trying 2 b original & do their own thing, but i would never hear this rendition on the radio & automatically think "O my gosh! i need 2 download this ASAP!" like how i did with nirvana... the song goes nowhere in this version. i think this is a song that is best left unkept. if animal collective was trying to get an eerie and unsettling vibe to it, nirvana had already achieved that so y try 2 go to any other level wit it? kurt already is singing in the abducter's viewpoint!
i disagree completely nirvana version of the song is so up beat and almost happy this is really a messed up vibe i think animal collective totally did it right
This sounds like Avey singing. Should've had Panda do it with some reverb, probably would've sounded better.
that said, this is pretty good. Love Animal Collective, used to be a huge fan of Nirvana, too (not saying they're bad, just saying I over-listened to them), and I'd say this is a pretty good interpretation of the song.
i love animal collective so much. Even if you don't like this you can recognize that these dudes are being super authentic and maybe you can respect that. I respect that Lady Gaga is being relatively authentic, but her authenticity does not resonate with me the same way that AC does. This is personal preference people so stop your blabbering...oh wait, this is youtube....
@JosephR00lzD00d its not supposed to sound like an exact copy, they're supposed to interpret themselves and sing it as if they made it. Not copy how it was supposed to sound, there's no point. Listening to a cover and expecting to hear the original tends to make you not like the cover a whole lot =/
@thecheesemouse Being unique doesn't mean it's not God fucking awful, along with everything else they've ever done. "IT'S UNIQUE. IT'S CHALLENGING." It's also absolute dreck.
go listen to 'stranger then kindness' by nick cave, and wipe your beloved merriweather from your minds before reconsidering to leave a stupid comment. this is more what animal collective is than the new material, and it digs deep.
...I love animal collective, but this is rendition of Polly is awful. It's pretty much a failed effort in all facets in my opinion. Animal Collective could crap on a plate you AC minions would probably eat it. I'm going to layer 10 different guitar riffs tomorrow on a 4-track...Then I am going to sing carelessly off-beat, and off key over it. Gonna make millions. Man it's easy these days.
He's not singing off beat. He's not singing on the same beat as the original, but he's not off beat. Any dope with a guitar (me included) who can strum four chords and sing can play the original song, no, this doesn't sound much like the original, but he's not off beat. He's singing in time, it's just a different time than the original.
If it's so easy, why don't you just crap on a plate?
Animal collective definitely takes some getting used to for a lot of people. At first I didn't know what to think of their music, but later on I thought about it and I wanted to listen to it again. Now, it grows on me a little more everytime i listen to it.
Of course you all thing it depends the meaning of a song if you fluctuate the inflection and erratic-ate the tone, I think it just destroys the original.
This song by the way is about a 14 year old who got raped by razors and a blow torch after a punk show.
i can see why people dont like this version of the song, but i find it more intriguing then nirvana's version (which i also loved). the broken sounds of the guitar and avey's "beaten down by the world" tone makes this version more haunting in my opinion. it is a very different interpretation but a very accurate one nonetheless.. even though you dont like it.. thanks for postin it :)
It's like I keep waiting for the song to get good -- kick into full motion swing -- but it never does. My favorite part was when my computer said, "It's 9'o clock", and I was disappointed because it wasn't part of the song.
xzvxbgh 1 week ago
ahahahaha what an AMAZING COVER !
NinaRockOnBensch 1 month ago
this is what a cover is supposed to be like
it's how animal collective would've played the song if they wrote it
not the way that nirvana intended it
if i wanted to hear nirvana's intention for the song i'd listen to it
people play covers for you to hear their take on great songs
and all you people who complain about it sounding nothing like the original might as well just LISTEN TO THE FUCKING ORIGINAL!!!
MrAnarchyintheusa 2 months ago
Comment removed
99kashus 3 months ago in playlist Liked
@spicegirlsfan472 Your opinions are fucking stupid.
TheMeltatron 5 months ago
I like this better than the Nirvana Version. This is way, way sexier.
momexrath 5 months ago
Sure is funny to think there's only one of us here (really) and everything is the same thing (actually) and there's nothing nowhere no one can do to make it any different (truly). I laugh myself to pieces.
SacredNonsense 5 months ago
and if you don't like that stuff either, go and listen to something else. you don't have to get mad at Animal Collective and the people that listen to them.
angelrivera716 5 months ago
@spicegirlsfan472 woah woah, the ONLY bundle of sticks i see here, IS YOU MR. SPICE GIRLS. lol seriously dude if you don't like the band get off the page and listen to the spice girls. don't come here and bad mouth people that listen to Animal Collective. a lot of their stuff is really, really good. if you don't like this, this is them being experimental and goofing around. they have really poppy, catchy stuff as well, if that is what you're into.
angelrivera716 5 months ago
@spicegirlsfan472 You should take your critiques back to your spice girls videos or whatever other faggot bullshit you listen to
TheMeltatron 6 months ago
@spicegirlsfan472 Why are you watching thier videos if you dont like them? It seems to me your a hateful person and beyond that your a dipshit.
TheMeltatron 6 months ago
I like AC but this is horrible
ghost2694 6 months ago
I prefer the original but this is great. I don't think this is so incredibly unique and different, though.
azzyhazers 7 months ago
sitting on deakins head
xredhenx 8 months ago
Very nice cover I got to admit.
WRmz91 9 months ago
groovy ass rendition
psychedelicSAUCE 9 months ago
I have this on a plain white 7" (no etchings or writing) with Purple Bottle on the other side. This is an amazing cover, the strumming and voice have a lot of emotion in them. After listening to this and then the original right after, I like Animal Collective's version more because it's darker and I like the strumming more.
mezezezah 10 months ago
Comment removed
dweezil013 10 months ago
muddy banks of the wishkah version has much more intensity and emotion..... i like animal collective but i dont like this. respect for their attempt though
velouriesa 10 months ago
Alright.
When someone does a cover, a good cover, the expectations are for the band/person to make it their own song pretty much. Animal Collective obviously did that.
AC is an amazing band, but I'd say they kind ruined this song. I love all of their music but this just wasn't one I enjoyed.
dinoloverXP 10 months ago
So much cooler
TRCOOLGUY 10 months ago
lol listen to nirvana's version and back here and hear crap
BearZzZz1 11 months ago
I love both versions. They're almost too different to compare.
maleficated 11 months ago 5
I love their version.... how it's all dark and shit. Nirvana gets covered a lot. Calm down.
ilovemyselfbetter 1 year ago 4
Calm down, everyone. I admit it's not the best version, but it's their interpretation of it. Obviously it's not going to sound exactly like Nirvana's, they're not even the same genre. Despite that, I will say - I understand they put their own little twist on it and whatnot, but it sucks. >_>
QuakerCakeable 1 year ago
eh, some people don't like to be challenged by music. Mistake pop sensibility for quality. Would rather be entertained than actively contemplate what they are hearing.
Samuoregon 1 year ago 2
thats shit and disturbing
crash9321 1 year ago
then dont fucking listen to it then, fags
glycerine16 1 year ago 2
Endurance test
FrogJacuzzi 1 year ago
This. Is. Ass.
cc4rtwright 1 year ago
when i went to listen to the nirvana version expected it to sound a lot sadder
numbersnmumbless 1 year ago
Comment removed
numbersnmumbless 1 year ago
fucking terrible
19FUZZ94 1 year ago
what the fuck is this
xxxTyler69 1 year ago
not my thang
raisethealarm7 1 year ago
i respect that they r trying 2 b original & do their own thing, but i would never hear this rendition on the radio & automatically think "O my gosh! i need 2 download this ASAP!" like how i did with nirvana... the song goes nowhere in this version. i think this is a song that is best left unkept. if animal collective was trying to get an eerie and unsettling vibe to it, nirvana had already achieved that so y try 2 go to any other level wit it? kurt already is singing in the abducter's viewpoint!
FallsApart17 1 year ago
@FallsApart17
i disagree completely nirvana version of the song is so up beat and almost happy this is really a messed up vibe i think animal collective totally did it right
DamedFilms 1 year ago
@FallsApart17 That's probably because the majority of the shit on the radio is absolute ballsack.
crazy8rgood 1 year ago 2
who is singing?
lovebabyL1 1 year ago
@lovebabyL1 avey
shanepandomonia 1 year ago
@lovebabyL1 avey
shanepandomonia 1 year ago
I wonder if polly actually did a recieve some sort of cracker
lesjeunes11 1 year ago
This sounds like Avey singing. Should've had Panda do it with some reverb, probably would've sounded better.
that said, this is pretty good. Love Animal Collective, used to be a huge fan of Nirvana, too (not saying they're bad, just saying I over-listened to them), and I'd say this is a pretty good interpretation of the song.
crazy8rgood 1 year ago
so beautiful
saritalovespita 1 year ago
one of the most beautiful things I've heard in a long time
saritalovespita 1 year ago
i love animal collective so much. Even if you don't like this you can recognize that these dudes are being super authentic and maybe you can respect that. I respect that Lady Gaga is being relatively authentic, but her authenticity does not resonate with me the same way that AC does. This is personal preference people so stop your blabbering...oh wait, this is youtube....
shadowmongoose 1 year ago 2
opinions....
shadowmongoose 1 year ago
they try way to hard to be hipster
bubblepopelictric 1 year ago
THIS IF FUCKING RETARDED
CINTERPOL 1 year ago
Sounds like a poorly done deconstruction assignment. But then again, don't all Animal Collective songs sound like they're poorly done?
CuneisWedge 1 year ago
This fucking sucks, this offends Nirvana's entire Nevermind album.Polly is the best song on there!
YOU FAILED A.C.
JosephR00lzD00d 1 year ago
@JosephR00lzD00d its not supposed to sound like an exact copy, they're supposed to interpret themselves and sing it as if they made it. Not copy how it was supposed to sound, there's no point. Listening to a cover and expecting to hear the original tends to make you not like the cover a whole lot =/
thecheesemouse 1 year ago 10
@thecheesemouse Finally. Someone with some fucking sense.
Hart316x 1 year ago 4
@Hart316x Yeah, you're right. It isn't supposed to be an exact copy. But it still fucking sucks.
kraastopher 1 year ago
@thecheesemouse Being unique doesn't mean it's not God fucking awful, along with everything else they've ever done. "IT'S UNIQUE. IT'S CHALLENGING." It's also absolute dreck.
runnersdialzero33 1 year ago
@runnersdialzero33 Take your opinion and climb back up to your pedestal.
TheCrimper 1 year ago
@TheCrimper You fucking are the best person in the world <3
Hart316x 1 year ago 4
@Hart316x You know how to make an old woman feel young again <3
TheCrimper 1 year ago
@Hart316x reach out touch faith mother fucker nasty bitch
runnersdialzero33 1 year ago
go listen to 'stranger then kindness' by nick cave, and wipe your beloved merriweather from your minds before reconsidering to leave a stupid comment. this is more what animal collective is than the new material, and it digs deep.
IanGS91 1 year ago
all of you twats are below this. so pipe down.
edanscime 1 year ago 3
I think Kurdt would have dug it.
mnwalke 1 year ago 3
awful
drl453 2 years ago
This is fucking awful. I love Animal Collective. But this is fucking shite.
monekyjumble 2 years ago
...I love animal collective, but this is rendition of Polly is awful. It's pretty much a failed effort in all facets in my opinion. Animal Collective could crap on a plate you AC minions would probably eat it. I'm going to layer 10 different guitar riffs tomorrow on a 4-track...Then I am going to sing carelessly off-beat, and off key over it. Gonna make millions. Man it's easy these days.
jdk8008 2 years ago
sorry if you dont get AC.
Why take the time to hate on em though?
PMID85 1 year ago 4
He's not singing off beat. He's not singing on the same beat as the original, but he's not off beat. Any dope with a guitar (me included) who can strum four chords and sing can play the original song, no, this doesn't sound much like the original, but he's not off beat. He's singing in time, it's just a different time than the original.
If it's so easy, why don't you just crap on a plate?
mnwalke 1 year ago
haha, omg NO!. this his horrible.
ivancorrea123 2 years ago
I Like this. and i love animal collective and nirvana
berryjinin 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fuck this, i'd rather kill myself than listen to this band and this cover is one of the worst things ive ever heard
kingaaronz 2 years ago
so much better than original
bummsecks 2 years ago
no, matt.
kingaaronz 2 years ago
kkkkk
bummsecks 2 years ago
truth. fucking hipsters.
lordofdogtownign 2 years ago
@kingaaronz thanks for sharing?
chinchiapet 2 years ago
I mean I like both nirvana and animal collective but this is a little strange for my likin haha
piratepopsicles 2 years ago
rofl no such thing. this cover is sexy XD
MannequinFilms 2 years ago
haha no the original tottaly makes me cream in my pantaloons
piratepopsicles 2 years ago
You are the winner. This video is your prize.
Hart316x 2 years ago
Animal collective definitely takes some getting used to for a lot of people. At first I didn't know what to think of their music, but later on I thought about it and I wanted to listen to it again. Now, it grows on me a little more everytime i listen to it.
RedXmasLights 2 years ago 5
its just starting to grow on me
Propolandante 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this is fucking horrible.
burnonedown09 2 years ago
I'm an AnCo fan and a Nirvana fan, and I don't really like this.
wassup287 2 years ago 6
i like turtles
aarondkeogh 2 years ago 36
This is bossome.
barno25 2 years ago
reminds me of the microphones
pondo0105 2 years ago
I love you
Hart316x 2 years ago
Of course you all thing it depends the meaning of a song if you fluctuate the inflection and erratic-ate the tone, I think it just destroys the original.
This song by the way is about a 14 year old who got raped by razors and a blow torch after a punk show.
schpelgherheizen 2 years ago
interesting, fact?
JAMxSkalla16 2 years ago
..omg I LOVE THIS QUALITY!!! I cant find any better TT-TT
JeffHouck1 2 years ago
This is really fucking good
hard0candies 2 years ago 3
More a fan of the New Wave version. And they should've done a cover of that if it would've had an impact on the sound of this.
NiehillListick 2 years ago
wtf this is so amazing
fuck you all
omgitscami93 2 years ago 32
agree
sammerro 2 years ago
wow i like some animal collective songs but i honestly think this is a pretty bad rendition of nirvana's song
oh well its not my song
taylorbortnerathing 2 years ago 2
Much better than the original.
Although I think it's more like the "new wave" version.
TheOdisMassacre 2 years ago
i love how their Nirvana covers sound absolutely nothing like Nirvana.
ofarevolution441 2 years ago
duuuuuuuuuuuuh
loldwhite 2 years ago
Comment removed
TC81190 2 years ago
Creepy ass shit
Terrodar12 2 years ago
yeah i am tooo.. it was down for me for like a week but its back now so yess!
tgq1228 2 years ago
ah poop... the vid gotten taken down... fuck this is gunna be hard to find again...
tgq1228 2 years ago
I'm listening to it right now!
Hart316x 2 years ago
i can see why people dont like this version of the song, but i find it more intriguing then nirvana's version (which i also loved). the broken sounds of the guitar and avey's "beaten down by the world" tone makes this version more haunting in my opinion. it is a very different interpretation but a very accurate one nonetheless.. even though you dont like it.. thanks for postin it :)
tgq1228 2 years ago 3
I like you!
Hart316x 2 years ago
Surprised, this is way better then the original.
mradamcooley 2 years ago
why would you take the time to post something that you think sucks?
swolf3 3 years ago
Have fun trying to find the CD this was on!
Hart316x 3 years ago
this song is on the purple bottle single.
vidadeverdade 2 years ago
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
Hart316x 2 years ago
What the hell?
This is terrible.
PublicAccessCabler 3 years ago
That is horrible.
stupidstudios1 3 years ago