Dr. Patrick Moore on Nuclear Energy and Low CO2 Emissions

[4326crim]

yeah this is the point of the anthropogenic climate change THEORY. switch to neuclear power more sufficient and we don't have to get fuel from middle east. but neuclear power produces neuclear waste which we just bury deep underground. not a good idea

[QuarereAude]

Carbon doesn't just come from smokestacks! Once again, life-cycle emissions are neglected in the comments.

[Entropy56]

"I don't understand why we are trying to keep millions of people from dying of disease in poor countries. The less people in the world the better."

~John Lennon

[papcio]

well dont forget about lithuania, which has also like 80% of energy from nuclear power plants and they use the chernobyl-technology without any accidents

[rightdemocrat]

Nuclear power is the way to go. We need to expand this clean and safe form of energy.

[ColdBloodedCarl]

Sweden huh, well, despite our high ratio of nuclear power backed up by hydrogen power we still can't produce enough electricity. That's why we bring in coal-power from our neighbouring country Denmark. It really is an embarrassing fact...

[jplieges]

Fossil fuels: Too dirty (especially coal).

Renewables: Hold much promise but are as yet incapable of producing the sort of energy we need.

Nuclear: Design of reactors and waste management have improved considerably. Their ability to provide copious amounts of energy whilst minimising environmental impact is a bonus. Perhaps we should give ti another chance?