5:23 - 5:48 what are they talking about when they say all the colors in white minus those that match the difference in energy shells within the atom?
what do they mean those that match the difference in the energy shells(the difference of what between the energy shells?) confused if they were talking about the colors then thought it was about (the numbers?) of energy shells?
It seems like the smaller something is, the more it spreads out or becomes wave-like seemingly because of the uncertainty principal. But, if I had a particle of 0 size, wouldn't it spread out infinitely as a wave rather than that electron which is pretty small, but not nothing, and it spreads out over finite space? If thats true, then a particle of 0 space extends infinitely and that a singularity cannot have 0 size because it doesn't extend infinitely?
5:38 How long do they take to return to a lower energy level? Wouldn't it be almost immediate and cause the absoption spectrum to be filled in with the emission spectrum?
@raydredX The half-lives of excited states is a well-known time for most atoms. And you are right, it is often pretty fast. But it isn't hard to isolate the incoming beam minus absorbed wavelengths, from the random-direction emissions when the excited states decay.
This video would be vastly improved by taking out the goofy CGI characters. The animation is TERRIBLE, the voice acting awful and it detracts from the exceptionally good presentation of the science.
if electrons pop in and out of existence, then how can compounds of elements be so stable, since the bonds between the two elements at some point don't exist.
@JoylessBrotato A chemical bond just changes the shape of the locations that the electron can use in its pop-in-pop-out shell game. The force of the bond itself is just an "average" of the variety of values that it can have as a result of the electrons quantum behavior.
Wonderful as always (particularly the jeeves segments..). I would like to submit a request for further detail on the particular mechanics. What does Schrödinger's equation really mean? What do the terms mean, what does the wave form *look* like? Or how might you render visualize it? Is it possible to better visualize the wave characteristics of matter, and to visualize their behavior and interactions as waves? Thank you!
Wonderful as always (particularly the jeeves segments..). I would like to submit a request for further detail on the particular mechanics. What does Schrödinger's equation really mean? What do the terms mean, what does the wave form *look* like? Or how might you render visualize it? Is it possible to better visualize the wave characteristics of matter, and to visualize their behavior and interactions as waves? Thank you!
with all the virtual electrons floating around the nucleus should there be a charge or more the one electron volt or do only one exist at a time and if they do, do they all travel in the same vector ?
@derickhaywood There are no virtual electrons as you describe them. Each real electron is simply indeterminate as to where it is, and that lack of location information makes it act as if it is everywhere it can be, but the "average" of all its characteristics equal the characteristics of a single electron.
@derickhaywood Each atom of an element has a set amount of electrons. The main point of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle is that if you try to determine the momentum of an e- then you effect its position and if you try to measure its position you effect its momentum. If there were these "virtual electrons" then just think the bonding capabilites of say H and O. The bond wouldn't be nearly as strong and life wouldn't exist as we know it.
Thanks, but to give credit where credit is due, we got many of these ideas for presentation from an older series called "The Mechanical Universe" and reworked the graphics.
Go to Wikipedia and type in Atom. Dont listen to dicks on here as most of them dont know shit, go to science forums and ask questions and also theres nothing wrong in watching these videos if the subject matter interest's you as bit by bit you will pick up information and learn about the world.
All i will say is that the solid world around you is not so solid as you might think when you start looking into smaller distance scales..... ;)
@ThePhilosophyBoy For sure, but unlike here it is edited by professionals and is a great source for information and the vast majority of it is very concise.
@ThePhilosophyBoy Yes, and no. I have tried to edit wiki for my own personal kicks, only to find that my entries were quickly erased by university professors. The people who edited wiki are never "random", they are almost always vested.
so the electron is like a fog? but what is an atom? is atom electron plus proton? whats proton and why is it in the middle of electron and how can it be a wave and a particle at the same time? this is so confusing
that's why i asked moron, couse i don't know this and i hoped somebody would simply anser my question instead of giving me such a dumb responce as you did, your just a waste of time
ok then if i tell u what an atom is do u really think that would solve the problem?
the atom is the smallest functional, structural component of matter that is indivisible throo usual physical and chemical processes.
and i said if u dont even know this u shouldnt be watching this clip ..if u want to know dont ask here ..u are wasting everyone's time ..go watch some basic chemistry clips if u wanna find out.
First, watch our QED video. Then, in terms of arrows (probability amplitudes), the arrows for for the photons to have different phases have to be considered. But the arrows for the two photons to end up having the same phase point in the same direction and add, while the arrows for the photons to have different phases point everywhere and cancel. This makes the "same-phase" probability much larger than the "different-phase" probability. (See pg 110 in Feynman's book shown at the end of QED.)
Why is that the electron can occupy a large region of space because it has a tiny mass and the nucleus (proton) vice versa.
I'm inclined to say that a nucleus occupies a larger region of space cause it has a bigger mass and an electron vice versa, but I get the feeling I'm not looking at it the right way.
According to Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, the larger the mass that a particle has, the more precisely its position can be known. Since the proton is almost 2000 times more massive than the electron, its position is correspondingly more precise. The light electron, is effectively "all over the place" by comparison.
It is easier for me to see 'particles' as balls of 'energy" of different sizes and therefore different properties. If this energy is spinning always, then we 'see' balls of particles. Can anyone correct me?
PLEASE DON'T READ THIS you will die in seven days if you don't post this comment on 10 videos in the next hour. if you do, tomorrow will be the best day of your life
When N=2 (for exemple) you have 2 possibles shap right? What made the difference? Why they can have 2 different shap? What is the condition to get 1 shap and not the other? Sphere in a sphere shap or dumbell cloud shap?
In the solution to the Schrodinger Equation, three quantum numbers arise from the space geometry of the solution and a fourth arises from the electron spin. The space quantum numbers are usually called n, l, and m where n is the principal quantum number, l is the orbital angular momentum quantum number and m is the magnetic quantum number.
The different shapes of the orbitals for a given value of n are caused by the electron having different values of orbital angular momentum -- different values of l. Higher values of n have even more possible values of l and correspondingly more possible shapes for the orbital.
this is soooo exciting .^^
danielchong1234 8 months ago
Comment removed
XSuperFistX 8 months ago
5:23 - 5:48 what are they talking about when they say all the colors in white minus those that match the difference in energy shells within the atom?
what do they mean those that match the difference in the energy shells(the difference of what between the energy shells?) confused if they were talking about the colors then thought it was about (the numbers?) of energy shells?
please explain
XSuperFistX 8 months ago
It seems like the smaller something is, the more it spreads out or becomes wave-like seemingly because of the uncertainty principal. But, if I had a particle of 0 size, wouldn't it spread out infinitely as a wave rather than that electron which is pretty small, but not nothing, and it spreads out over finite space? If thats true, then a particle of 0 space extends infinitely and that a singularity cannot have 0 size because it doesn't extend infinitely?
steeveyneon 8 months ago
5:38 How long do they take to return to a lower energy level? Wouldn't it be almost immediate and cause the absoption spectrum to be filled in with the emission spectrum?
raydredX 9 months ago
@raydredX The half-lives of excited states is a well-known time for most atoms. And you are right, it is often pretty fast. But it isn't hard to isolate the incoming beam minus absorbed wavelengths, from the random-direction emissions when the excited states decay.
cassiopeiaproject 9 months ago
@cassiopeiaproject A channel can be great for it's good content. But when they answer you back, when you need it, it makes it even greater. Thanks.
raydredX 9 months ago
This video would be vastly improved by taking out the goofy CGI characters. The animation is TERRIBLE, the voice acting awful and it detracts from the exceptionally good presentation of the science.
RowanTE 9 months ago
if electrons pop in and out of existence, then how can compounds of elements be so stable, since the bonds between the two elements at some point don't exist.
JoylessBrotato 11 months ago
@JoylessBrotato A chemical bond just changes the shape of the locations that the electron can use in its pop-in-pop-out shell game. The force of the bond itself is just an "average" of the variety of values that it can have as a result of the electrons quantum behavior.
cassiopeiaproject 11 months ago
ithis series is funny because it uses subliminal messaging, but still good that it could attract kids with using cartoons
Devorvan 11 months ago
yes or no...are we just living in one big giant back to the future.
jOWNZin22 11 months ago
Why does an electron pop in an out of existence over a greater area than a proton just because the electron has less mass?
steeveyneon 1 year ago
@steeveyneon Yes.
cassiopeiaproject 1 year ago
Wonderful as always (particularly the jeeves segments..). I would like to submit a request for further detail on the particular mechanics. What does Schrödinger's equation really mean? What do the terms mean, what does the wave form *look* like? Or how might you render visualize it? Is it possible to better visualize the wave characteristics of matter, and to visualize their behavior and interactions as waves? Thank you!
gradientDissent 1 year ago
Wonderful as always (particularly the jeeves segments..). I would like to submit a request for further detail on the particular mechanics. What does Schrödinger's equation really mean? What do the terms mean, what does the wave form *look* like? Or how might you render visualize it? Is it possible to better visualize the wave characteristics of matter, and to visualize their behavior and interactions as waves? Thank you!
gradientDissent 1 year ago
5:49
does that mean there are gaps in the color spectrum that we have not seen or discovered yet?
Omegaroth 1 year ago
Nice one for uploading these videos. This is by far the most educational video I've ever watched.
cnidoblast 1 year ago
I am the light.
kaderoder 1 year ago
with all the virtual electrons floating around the nucleus should there be a charge or more the one electron volt or do only one exist at a time and if they do, do they all travel in the same vector ?
derickhaywood 1 year ago
@derickhaywood There are no virtual electrons as you describe them. Each real electron is simply indeterminate as to where it is, and that lack of location information makes it act as if it is everywhere it can be, but the "average" of all its characteristics equal the characteristics of a single electron.
cassiopeiaproject 1 year ago
@cassiopeiaproject I don't understand, what's the difference between virtual particles and the non existing virtual electrons?
magichristo 1 year ago
@derickhaywood Each atom of an element has a set amount of electrons. The main point of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle is that if you try to determine the momentum of an e- then you effect its position and if you try to measure its position you effect its momentum. If there were these "virtual electrons" then just think the bonding capabilites of say H and O. The bond wouldn't be nearly as strong and life wouldn't exist as we know it.
a1Drummer07 1 year ago
Since Schrödingers equation uses only linear operators you can find for any given quantum number n shells with any form you like.
b00n707 1 year ago
Wow, Dianna is having an epileptic fit thinking about Shrodinger's Equation. I like her!
Nomoreidsleft 1 year ago
Amazing visualizations again..
Baleur 1 year ago
can't get any dumber than this
dedanoe 1 year ago
at 1:39 to 2:32, is the best explained science to electronics calculations that I have seen.
scoat23 2 years ago
Thanks, but to give credit where credit is due, we got many of these ideas for presentation from an older series called "The Mechanical Universe" and reworked the graphics.
cassiopeiaproject 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
lloplop 2 years ago
Fascinating info but...
The characters in these video are creepy as hell
N who the hell "Jeeves" ?
OBZRV82 2 years ago 20
You can find out all about Jeeves by reading the story on our web site.
cassiopeiaproject 2 years ago
@OBZRV82 Why do they rock back and forth when they talk. So creepy
emailsucksass7354 1 year ago
@emailsucksass7354 I knew I wasn't the only one LoL
OBZRV82 1 year ago
@OBZRV82 I think Jeeves is the bald guy's personal trainer...
luccaskunk 10 months ago
@OBZRV82 lmao, i think jeeves is the creepy echo voice.
juanarruti 6 months ago
This is a hard one. I know what they are talking about, but it is not explained in a way where it makes sense to me.
ALaudun 2 years ago
i think other than making the video educational theres the dumb blonde innuendo.
MorbidAngel4444 2 years ago
Go to Wikipedia and type in Atom. Dont listen to dicks on here as most of them dont know shit, go to science forums and ask questions and also theres nothing wrong in watching these videos if the subject matter interest's you as bit by bit you will pick up information and learn about the world.
All i will say is that the solid world around you is not so solid as you might think when you start looking into smaller distance scales..... ;)
KF81 2 years ago 12
Yeah... the more we look at matter, the less we think it's matter.
vava54own 2 years ago
@KF81 Wikipidea is made up by random people aswell. Moron.
ThePhilosophyBoy 1 year ago
@ThePhilosophyBoy For sure, but unlike here it is edited by professionals and is a great source for information and the vast majority of it is very concise.
KF81 1 year ago
@ThePhilosophyBoy Yes, and no. I have tried to edit wiki for my own personal kicks, only to find that my entries were quickly erased by university professors. The people who edited wiki are never "random", they are almost always vested.
morningstomper123 1 year ago
Cute Diana...
kyleyorkke 2 years ago
so the electron is like a fog? but what is an atom? is atom electron plus proton? whats proton and why is it in the middle of electron and how can it be a wave and a particle at the same time? this is so confusing
Zee96969696 2 years ago
u need to learn some basic chemistry before asking this ..u dont even know what an atom is -.-
sidewaysfcs0718 2 years ago
that's why i asked moron, couse i don't know this and i hoped somebody would simply anser my question instead of giving me such a dumb responce as you did, your just a waste of time
Zee96969696 2 years ago
ok then if i tell u what an atom is do u really think that would solve the problem?
the atom is the smallest functional, structural component of matter that is indivisible throo usual physical and chemical processes.
and i said if u dont even know this u shouldnt be watching this clip ..if u want to know dont ask here ..u are wasting everyone's time ..go watch some basic chemistry clips if u wanna find out.
all ur doing is trolling, wasting people's time.
sidewaysfcs0718 2 years ago
basic chemistry clips? your a genious, off course, thats what I gotta do, thanks for your help buddy
Zee96969696 2 years ago
Why are these guys discussing quantum mechanics in some sort of non existent realm
vvillem9 2 years ago
Jeeves is smarter than all three of these numbnuts
fancygremlin 2 years ago
Yes it is Diana, you know what else is cool
iono54321 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
My PENIS.
ChrisManzi 2 years ago
It's REALLY distracting to see CGI figures talk. Actors would be much more natural.
JanPBtest 2 years ago
Is that John Locke?!
brianonymous 2 years ago
I love this documentary, it's a great refresher. I've watched it twice now
tolsonw 2 years ago
Shes got a right pair !!
HuggyBeatz 2 years ago
Can you help me to understand why the emitted photon is in phase with the incident photon in the case of stimulated radiation?
Thanx!
ANewNormalcy 2 years ago
First, watch our QED video. Then, in terms of arrows (probability amplitudes), the arrows for for the photons to have different phases have to be considered. But the arrows for the two photons to end up having the same phase point in the same direction and add, while the arrows for the photons to have different phases point everywhere and cancel. This makes the "same-phase" probability much larger than the "different-phase" probability. (See pg 110 in Feynman's book shown at the end of QED.)
cassiopeiaproject 2 years ago
Why is that the electron can occupy a large region of space because it has a tiny mass and the nucleus (proton) vice versa.
I'm inclined to say that a nucleus occupies a larger region of space cause it has a bigger mass and an electron vice versa, but I get the feeling I'm not looking at it the right way.
Can somebody explain it to me?
phozk 2 years ago
According to Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, the larger the mass that a particle has, the more precisely its position can be known. Since the proton is almost 2000 times more massive than the electron, its position is correspondingly more precise. The light electron, is effectively "all over the place" by comparison.
cassiopeiaproject 2 years ago
It is easier for me to see 'particles' as balls of 'energy" of different sizes and therefore different properties. If this energy is spinning always, then we 'see' balls of particles. Can anyone correct me?
joelito101 2 years ago
why is it that this video is no longer acessable? :S how disapointing. :(
JessiKkaTye 3 years ago
It's available for me. Maybe you can try again.
pjioayncoe 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
PLEASE DON'T READ THIS you will die in seven days if you don't post this comment on 10 videos in the next hour. if you do, tomorrow will be the best day of your life
judomad84 3 years ago
When N=2 (for exemple) you have 2 possibles shap right? What made the difference? Why they can have 2 different shap? What is the condition to get 1 shap and not the other? Sphere in a sphere shap or dumbell cloud shap?
magnetismewave 3 years ago
In the solution to the Schrodinger Equation, three quantum numbers arise from the space geometry of the solution and a fourth arises from the electron spin. The space quantum numbers are usually called n, l, and m where n is the principal quantum number, l is the orbital angular momentum quantum number and m is the magnetic quantum number.
cassiopeiaproject 3 years ago
The different shapes of the orbitals for a given value of n are caused by the electron having different values of orbital angular momentum -- different values of l. Higher values of n have even more possible values of l and correspondingly more possible shapes for the orbital.
cassiopeiaproject 3 years ago