You again? Did I not just school you in the other video regarding Keith Olbermann's suspension?
Have I not made my point clear that Fox News is the worst piece of shit that passes itself off as a legitimate news station? Sure MSNBC can be criticized as the carbon copy of Fox News but Liberal, however the difference in the two is that while Fox News practice cheap dirty methods to sway their viewers (see 'Clinton sets the record straight' on youtube) MSNBC uses actual facts.
@Roshby54 Ummm, you have no point, and if you read my reply to your other post, you were destroyed.
MSNBC only quotes facts that fit its liberal agenda. last time i checked MSNBC doenst have conserv. contributors. one side only. you couldnt school a 5th grader because your knowledge of history is pathetic at best. just like every lib. you say nothing of value then claim a "victory". you probably dont even watch fox news, and just spew the filth that the left wing wants you to believe.
I will agree that MSNBC do show Liberals in the better light, and there aren't many Conservative contributors. But Fox makes it appear to be a chore when they have left wing guests on their channel. Condescending tones, abrupt cut offs, and (if you saw the Clinton/Fox video) one way questions. My knowledge of history is pathetic? Try again. We're not talking about history, but politics. We're not talking about the 20th century here.
@Roshby54 at least fox gives them an opportunity to state their views, and let the LISTENERS decide who's correct. on the MSM, the listener doesnt get that choice. that's why fox kicks ALL their asses in the ratings. and you dont think the MSM serves up softballs to the liberals? gimme a break. they NEVER ask the tough questions, and just let them serve up their canned BS answers.
@Roshby54 and how's your boy obama working out for you, rofl. unemployment way above a level he said it wouldnt reach, massive explosion of debt that hasnt done ANYTHING to help the economy, failed policy after failed policy, diplomatic relations in turmoil, a completely botched oil spill, rampant corruption with marxists in abundance, trampling of the constitution. should i go on? keep your head in the sand. when it comes all comes tumbling down, we'll see how you feel about the annointed 1
Don't tell me that you're really going to insult Obama for not being able to bring the USA back after YOUR FUCKING REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT SPENT 8 LONG YEARS DIGGING US UNDER. You want to talk about the economy? Let's talk about how all of our taxpayers money went towards an unnecessary war in the middle east under false pretenses, claiming it was for WMD's. You want to talk about a botched oil spill? How about the horrible incompetent reaction to Katrina? I can go on as well pal.
@Roshby54 bring the US back? are you fucking kidding me? he's driven it even deeper in to a hole than bush EVER did. he spent $1 trillion dollars to stimulate the economy, and its gotten WORSE. he's racked up more debt than any other president ever, with NOTHING to show for it. and there you go again. you cant talk about how big a failure obama is without talking about bush. BUSH IS NO LONGER IN OFFICE. WHEN IS OBAMA RESPONSIBLE FOR HIS OWN ACTIONS? GET OFF BUSH'S NUTS ALREADY!
And I'm going to be dead honest with you. There are many things Obama has done that I'm not happy with (health care) but he is twice the better president than Bush could have ever been. Republicans are incompetent but my main point is that Fox News is nothing more than an advert for Republican politicians, giving misguided facts to a Republican fan base. You're looking past the faults your party made for 8 years and sneering at our attempts to fix your mistakes.
@Roshby54 who says im a rebublican? you're assumptions are misguided. ALMOST ALL of our politicians are worthless, including the bulk of the republicans. they are nothing more than a bunch of RINO's. spending money we dont have is killing this country, and Obaman has done more of that than any other president in american history, period. we have marxists sitting in the white house, and also in congress, and it's time for them ALL to go.
Argumentam Ad Populum. That means your argument for fox is that since they get better ratings, then that must mean they're correct. And what kind of an opportunity? Enough for them to give one coherent statement until they get cut off by some biased commentator who is SO SURE that they're wrong? Fox does let the LISTENER decide who's correct and seeing as how THE ONLY AUDIENCE WHO WATCHES FOX ARE ALL RIGHT WING, OF COURSE THERES ONLY GOING TO BE ONE VICTOR BASED ON THEIR OPINION.
@Roshby54 your argument forgets one thing. if the people didnt want to watch fox, they wouldnt. so, by default, what your saying is, you're smarter than the majority of the country. typical progressive arrogance.
@winikten1 It's simple. I brought Bush into the conversation because you were insulting Obama for not being able to bring the United States back from the deficit and for being incompetent on diplomatic relations, and that goddamn oil spill. I even admitted that I'm not his biggest fan, but you have to understand that he wasn't the one who started this whole clusterfuck of a mess. I assumed you are a Republican solely because you watch Fox and your responses to me haven't said otherwise.
@Roshby54 yep, i watch fox amongst other channels. i even watch the MSM to see what BS they are spewing. Im not insulting obama for not being able to bring us back from the deficit, im insulting him for making it WORSE than ANY president before him. when he campaigned he said he'd fix it. he said he'd bring change. what he's brought is WORSE problems than we've EVER seen before. he said unemployment wouldnt go over 8% with his stimulus. it went over 10%, then down to 9.5, and now back up.
@Roshby54 the unemployment problem IS obama's fault. he made it WORSE. that's my point. dont drag bush in to this like its all HIS fault. its the fault of every administration since woodrow wilson, and obama is making more mistakes than ANY other president before him, not to mention, he's a marxist.
My, you're ignorant. You pathetic conservative insect, were you not aware that Clinton's administration had balanced the deficit? And Bush's administration ruined it all with his idiotic policies. Were you not aware that the economic downfall was originally predicted to be much, much worse? What the pitiful, diseased lump in your head that you mistake for a brain has failed to realize is that Obama has kept the economy from getting even worse.
@Kageryushin yes, clinton balanced the budget...but he also created a massive housing bubble with his "everyone gets a home" policy, pressuring banks to give mortgages to people that shouldnt have gotten them. that bubble burst during bush's term.
obama has done nothing to improve our economy. his own prediction was that spending $1 trillion dollars on the stimulus would keep unemployment under 8%. it hasnt been under 9% in over 2 years...he's a lying marxist POS.
I can't believe I forgot to mention this. I already proved that if Obama was bad for his response on the oil spill, Bush was horrible for his failure with Katrina. But were you aware that the oil spill occurred due to lack of safety regulations that started under Bush? Let's think about that for a second.
Diplomatic relations in turmoil? There are two main countries who hate us:
@Roshby54 umm, WTF does bush have to do with this conversation. now i KNOW you're a progressive, because that's all progressives can say is "well, bush did this, this, and this." bush has NOTHING to do with the fact that obama is a marxist, and is trying to ruin this country. bush made PLENTY of mistakes.
bush is out of office. when is obama going to accept responsibility?
you have no ammo, you're shooting in the dark. obama has completely weakened our position across the world.
true story" laura ingrahm dumped this guy because she walked in on him sucking the cock of a nfl player. now you know why he is so pro-homo, pro-black and muslim asslicker
YAHOOOOO Kitty Oberfuhrer gets kicked in the butt by his/ her/ its own cronies, much like the repudiation of Obama's Fruit and Nut Company !!! 2012 Here we come, Ready or not !!!
YAHOOOOO Kitty Oberfuhrer gets kicked in the butt by his/ her/ its own cronies, much like the repudiation of Obama's Fruit and Nut Company !!! 2012 Hre we come, Ready or not !!!
Olbergoebles and mad cow need ratings , it's all about numbers . The death spiral of the lamestream media continues. Maybe they can get out of those stupid contracts . Couldn't be any worse than Alan Colmes. Being stupid is controversial.
renatasequoia-Everything you say is wrong. The 1st job of every business, including the news "business", is to make $-not perform charitable services for society. Over $650million in annual funding goes to, not just CPB(which feeds PBS & NPR), but hundreds of millions of that goes to individual PBS & NPR stations as programming grants--a huge govt subsidy which is never mentioned by proponents of public broadcasting so as to disguise the true size of govt support. U R just uninformed/naive.
@smokethosetaliban Federal Government supports for PBS =15% of network budget. Way too small to ease PBS need for corporate underwriting.
With more than 70% of its prime-time shows funded wholly or in major part by 4 giant oil companies, PBS has become known as the "Petroleum Brodcasting System"
Example: British Petroleum is a underwriter of the The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer.Effect; soft pedaled news presented re; oil spill caused by BP being regular corporate sponsor of 5-night a week program
Having said that about PBS conflict of interest I have to say that PBS present far better, more professional, and more objective news than Fox News, CNN and other main TV news.
Why? Because is non-profit, less dependent from corporate sponsors and advertisers. Although, lacking adequate funds and staff PBS cannot be totally independent like PUBLICLY owned BBC - one of the best media outlets in the word.
@renatasequoia You say--"Having said that about PBS conflict of interest I have to say that PBS present far better, more professional, and more objective news than Fox News, CNN and other main TV news.
Why? Because is non-profit, less dependent from corporate sponsors and advertisers. "---typical lib...you want it both ways. PBS is unbiased because they are unbeholdened to corporations---and---they are not a govt news outlet since a "small" part of their budget is grants. Make up your mind
@renatasequoia I guess I could say it over and over and you , out of blind love for big govt, would never get it...but here it is again. The "network budget" numbers you heaved up do not include the other huge channel of money into public broadcasting...that is grants given directly to stations. You govt lovers ALWAYS leave that out--as part of your ignorance or dishonesty(pick one). And you are brainwashed if you think PBS/NPR isn't just as one-sided as any other outlet. You are an NPR tool.
@smokethosetaliban No."Blind love" for the govmt is as dangerous as "blind love" for corporations & "perfect markets".
I see that you see the world and problems in black and white. That is why you accuse your opponents to be the negative copy of yourself. I see that you love to twist words of others. I've never said that PBS is NEVER influenced by large donors, quite the contrary.
But I've also said that PBS is still BETTER than Fox, because in many cases is not SO MUCH influenced as Fox.
@smokethosetaliban You are really arrogant "intelectual" a la Sarah Palin
You like to smear people without presenting facts and reasons.
If I was wrong it would be easy to prove, by showing the accurate numbers.
But you rather accuse people that they "heave" numbers. Exactly like Glen Beck. You don't have the slightest clue what I "love" but you "know" for sure, just because you've said so.. NPR is "ALWAYS one-sided" but give me a reason why Fox is not?
@renatasequoia you are a whiner and you have a short memory. You cry that I am all insults, yet our first words to one another started with you calling me "dumbass". Review our posts over the last several days to see how I challenged your BS with facts and you left every challenge of mine unanswered--such as: % of govt funding for PBS&NPR is higher than you said--then you say "Because PBS is non-profit, less dependent from corporate sponsors and advertisers", it is "more objective"->>>>>>>>>>>>>
@renatasequoia I made it up? Go back & see the first word of your first post to me--then tell me who is making things up like a child. & you managed to latch onto a poll naming PBS as the most trusted(before, you said they were bought and paid for by BP, but now you like them again). Funny how such a tiny few watch or get their news from PBS as compared to FNC. While PBS grovels for sponsors, Fox is awash in advertising revenues meaning the people have voted--with their remotes--theres ur poll
@smokethosetaliban Here are some facts and reasons for my previous statements:
" Feb.2010 Americans have named PBS the most trusted and unbiased institution among nationally known organizations, the most trusted source of news and public affairs among broadcast and cable sources,& the most educational media brand for children according to new national polls
The research was conducted in Dec 2009 and Jan. 2010 by the non-partisan, international research company GfK Roper Public Affairs & Media
@renatasequoia SO WHICH IS IT?1> PBS is objective cuz it is largely govt funded--Again, here's your quote--""Because PBS is non-profit, less dependent from corporate sponsors and advertisers", it's "more objective" , --OR--, 2>only !!15%!! of the PBS budget is govt funds ...again, here is a quote from you--"PBS is mainly sponsored by corporations and public,not government".-- Looks like you want ur cake and eat it 2--every time you write, you mess in your own nest> Cmon --which is it?
welcome back olbermann...we miss you...you are a genius...just cuz food and cartoon networks are rated higher than msnbc means nothing...its not about ratings...its about the truth and noone delivers truth like you...fox news only cares about making money...you guys obviously don't care about that since only .03% of Americans watch you...
@XioNilrem "Oh and just to let everyone know, Keith Olbermann has been reinstated and will return to the air on Tuesday night."--oh, great...thanks for the bulletin...I'll get a cheeseball and a 12pack ...you bring the little smokies!
@XioNilrem --"Oh and just to let everyone know, Keith Olbermann has been reinstated and will return to the air on Tuesday night."-----Oh great...thanks for the bulletin. I'll get a cheeseball and a 12pack...you bring the little smokies...
FoxNews Alert : The great Keith Olbermann's suspension is being lifted by MSNBC next Tuesday. ........I told you Olbermann haters that he would be back. Eat crow , Repukes. Ah Ha Ha Ha Ha !
@tiityboy, you're not going to start crying like Rep. Johnny"Orange"Boner, or Glen Beck, are you? Stunt are not, you neocon teabaggers got hoodwinked, and welcome back Mr. Olbermann.
@c588414 Who got hoodwincked? "teabaggers" just changed the political landscape for at least a generation by helping republicans sweep state legislatures, govenorships, county boards and commisions, judgeships, and every other nook and cranny beneath national offices. Redistricting nationwide will only amplify these gains in the next four election cycles as Obama singlehandedly smothers the life out of your party. YOU GOT HOODWINKED--BY OBAMA. And you can have Olby and his canoe-full of viewers!
@smokeyourownturd, please accept my humble apology for offending you neocon Teabaggers. A teabagger, like yourself, is one who is eager to please. You people gladly drop to your knees, part your pouty lips, and open your mouth's wide enough so any man, especially a neocon, can dip their nutsack in your awaiting mouth. The reason why I shy away from you teabaggers is because you all lie a lot and your breath stinks.
UPDATED: Before Bush Donor Takeover Of MSNBC, Network Selectively Applies Rules To Suspend Olbermann
Comcast has finalized a deal to purchase a majority stake in NBC, awaits final approval of the takeover from the Justice Department.
Once Comcast gains final approval from federal regulators to move forward, Comcast COO Steve Burke, a Bush fundraiser, will be placed at the helm of MSNBC and other NBC companies
@renatasequoia Yeah,dumbass...democracy was in such good hands with dan rather and olberman and npr and pbs and katie couric and matt lauer and charlie gibson ...yeah right. Maybe now the news business can do what a business is supposed to do...make money...attract viewers...things that Fox's competition has failed/forgotten how to do. Or maybe you prefer that all news be supplied by the govt via hundreds of millions/billions of $ from govt grants like CPB/PBS/NPR>THAT'S goodbye democracy
@smokethosetaliban "Dumbass.."Yeah". Hmm..I can see; your "debate" is on very high level; that's why you think ' news busines' role is to "make money..attract viewers.. etc.
I think the role of %TV news is to INFORM and show real problems. Also: TEACH and EXPLAIN with assistance of real experts. PBS is mainly sponsored by corporations and public,not government. I am for PUBLIC media like BBC, which is sponsored mainly by viewers, not govmt.
BBC is one of the best media in the world, not FOX.
@smokethosetaliban Oh,really? I "have no clue" because I presented argument using facts,examples and reason.You show of with name calling.
I am a "socialist" because I am against one sided corporate TV news which show the only one point of view, and only from the CONSERVATIVE perspective. Example? Tax cuts. Most Fox news viewers have no clue that many Republicans and businessmen are against tax cuts for the rich. U have no clue who sponsors PBS.
MSNBC has suspended star anchor Keith Olbermann for donated to 3 candidates this election.
NBC policy does NOT prohibit employees from donating to political candidates – which would be unconstitutional.
Meanwhile, Republicans Joe Scarborough and Pat Buchanan also gave political contributions, but are not suspended. We've had enough insanity this week.
I wouldn't mind if they did put him back on. He's one of the reasons we were able to take over the House Of Representatives. Olbermann's lies and he and all the others accusing us of racism, otherwise slandering us, insulting our intelligence etc. played a big part in our victory. We can use all that kind of help we can get because we're just ready to begin now.
Wow, look at these comments. Look at the hatred that followed Olbermann. Soldiers are fighting and dying for their freedoms to hate America the way that they do. No wonder we have a muslim terrorist usuper pretending to be president. How sad. No love for the USA, only hate and intolerance.
News is bullshit. The only way to know about a politician is to check his background and his voting record. For Hussein Obama, his background proves he is a muslim terrorist, a fundamental communist, funded by a muslim prince, studied primarily marxism throughout school, raised by a muslim communist, born in Kenya, never proved citizenship, voted for stabbing babies in the back of the skull killing them and present for everything else. Oh, and is a racist fuck.
Hypocryte exposed. He cried like as stuck donkey when Fox News Owners contributed to a Republican Governor campaign fund. So they are bad for disclosing their contributions,why Olbermann is good and he hides them.
They said he started out as a host of a "straight news program". That's impossible. MSNBC has never had a "straight news program". They have never been anything but a left wing propaganda agency.
Haha! The Republican Revolution of November 2 not only got rid of Democrats but also bias idiot News casters like Olbermann. Hahaha! Go sit with you friend Rick Sanchez in the unemployment office. Join your fellow out work Democrat buddies. Haha!
@Death2Fanboys Now we just need to get rid of the rest of the biased casters, so pretty much all of Fox would be gone, MSNBC, and about 3/4 of CNN as well. I think that would be pretty fair, maybe we can finally get real news and not the garbage most people spew. A bit tired of seeing them appeal to people's ignorance and it actually work, oh how simple minded people can be.
@tiitytat Kid, you have no clue just how out of your league you truly are. Your fallacious pseudo arguments do nothing but show that you have nothing relevant to say. You have nothing of substance, you cannot rely on using reason, logic, or the facts for that matter. You really do need to grow up kid, you are the type of person that truly hurts and hinders the United States. Shame you don't care for your country much, otherwise you wouldn't be such an eyesore and disappointment.
@XioNilrem Well, you sure are interested in what I have to say, aren't you. Hahaha. Keep killing the liberal gene pool! Thank you for that. Keep voting for idiots with no governing experience. Yeah, I have no clue, yeah no facts. Did you even ever look at your messiahs record? NO, didn't think so. Did you even look at who financed his scholastic career? No, didn't think so. Do you even care? No, you don't because you are an enemy of the USA and the constitution.I bet you reply again.
@tiitytat I am shocked, I would like to congratulate you on being correct for the first time. I did reply, just like you predicted. It is a shame though that most of what you said are all false and empty claims (as usual). But you can at least say you were correct on one point. You are a joke, you are exactly the reason why the founding fathers set up the voting system as they did, they knew the common peoples intelligence could never be trusted to directly vote in a President.
@XioNilrem I was intrigued enough by your quarrel w/tiitytat to review your posts and found this by you--". You are a joke, you are exactly the reason why the founding fathers set up the voting system as they did, they knew the common peoples intelligence could never be trusted to directly vote in a President." --Guess what... you are at least lacking in understanding about the intentions of the founding fathers and would likely lose a serious debate about the role of govt, constitution,etc.
@smokethosetaliban Are you being serious? If you looked to why the electoral college was implemented, it would be clear that one (of a few) reason why was because there was distrust in the judgment of the people. Since people are quite easily swayed by how one speaks and not what one speaks, this is meant to act to circumvent peopled from in a sense, being swept off their feet.
it was also meant to give the States some power and influence in the elections as well.
@XioNilrem You are mistaken about the circumstances leading to the creation of the electoral college...it was certainly not a concern by the founders that "common peoples intelligence could not be trusted" as you say. That is, in fact, a contradiction to the sentiments of the founders. It was, first and foremost, a concern about larger, more populous states having a disproportionate impact on the coice for president and a concern about foriegn influence. Your cheap shot landed in your own bunker
@smokethosetaliban Cheap shot? Have you even read what Alexander Hamilton stated in regard to the process? "It was equally desirable, that the immediate election should be made by men most capable of analyzing the qualities adapted to the station... A small number of persons, selected by their fellow-citizens from the general mass, will be most likely to possess the information and discernment requisite to such complicated investigations.
@XioNilrem In an age when transfer of information was primitive, the notion of citizens electing other ordinary citizens to travel to capitols to gather information not readily and speedily available to the masses in rural areas was not in any way a judgement about the intelligence of those masses but a practicality of the times. Had Hamilton felt the masses ill-equipped to make intelligent decisions, he surely would not have designed a system wherein the electors were harvested from those same
@smokethosetaliban I do not agree with that claim, for one of the main points of in peoples ability to be swayed or the possibility of coercion. It is not that the information is out there, but whether or not the citizens will seek out such knowledge. The idea that fear mongering, sympathy, and quite grotesque (and possibility of flawed political ads) only shows that a large portion are being manipulated.
@smokethosetaliban Also, looking at the timeframe and when this was conceievd. It is not hard to believe that he (and various other poltiiczal figures) had a rather, unpleasant view of the general masses. And while having that, would have the system in such a way. It was to allow (and hope for) that the intellectuals could be nominated, giving the citizens a sense of freedom to choose. While not resorting to having a rather, tyrannical king like system where the people have zero say.
@XioNilrem Hey, I appreciate the respectfull discussion--I just fundementally disagree with your interpretation. But I conceade that you are no pushover in a debate as I predicted earlier. I gotta get some sleep. Its been fun--do this again some time...take care...
@smokethosetaliban Finally, nearly done replying and saying what I wanted to say. I appreciate your remarks and not resorting to fallacious arguments and knowing what you are talking about. We may have gotten off on the wrong foot but I did enjoy it. I am also glad that you did not consider me a pushover (although you could have mentioned that earlier, I do like being complimented haha), but you did a good job on your end. Take care and keep up the good work.
@smokethosetaliban So as such, in having a middle area (allowing for the masses to have some say, while not having an actual direct say on the matter), they were allowed to have a sort of safe system. It does not focus on an extreme (either direct involvement by the citizens or none at all).
@smokethosetaliban Cont. It was also peculiarly desirable to afford as little opportunity as possible to tumult and disorder. This evil was not least to be dreaded in the election of a magistrate, who was to have so important an agency in the administration of the government as the President of the United States. But the precautions which have been so happily concerted in the system under consideration, promise an effectual security against this mischief." - Alexander Hamilton
@XioNilrem 1st--it was clearly nothing but a cheap shot by you against tiity...be honest about that and we can proceed...2nd--your interpretation of the Hamilton quote is definitely subject to debate as you did not include the first and opposing elements of his statement...i.e...."it was equally desirable"...etc. 3rd--there was anything but unanimity of opinion among his peers on this...4th--the electoral college underwent several iterations over time--5th--"possess the info"...not intelligence
@smokethosetaliban Sorry but besides a reply to your point, I will not be talking about that lowlife. If someone accuses me of stalking while posting in a video I commented on in the past (a video about a guys dog he had to put down), and saying that I am a baby killer and that I killed my dog (that had to be put down), well I'd rather not give garbage like him any more attention then he already has.
@XioNilrem Hey, ...perhaps you could understand how the quote about "intelligence of common people" would be offensive to most--especially those of us who abhore elitism and govt which pretends to know more than the governed. No intention by me to take sides on all that other stuff about your dog--sorry about your dog, BTW. You don't sound like a baby killer.
@smokethosetaliban Elitism is a strange thing, as for myself, I look down to some degree on elitism (in particular, being knowledgeable on politics and the system) but on the other hand, I think its a necessity. We do not live in a world where everyone has equal education or intelligence. I hope that those who run the government are (in some respects) more intelligent than the masses. Like for presidents, I don't want someone who is just another guy, I want someone better then the average Joe.
@smokethosetaliban I think I just have a negative outlook on the intelligence of most people. Which is probably quite clear from what I have said. I do thank you for your comment about my dog and the fact that you do not look to me as a baby killer.
@smokethosetaliban Now, the bits I left out were done so because I did not really wish to have three replies worth of a quote, followed by a fourth comment on the actual substance. And yes, it did undergo several iterations which is what I also stated in my reply.
Finally, as for your comment last comment:" possess the information and discernment requisite to such complicated investigations" I would at least consider to some degree, that hints to knowledge (i.e. intelligence).
@smokethosetaliban Alas, although you seem to wish to simply go after me with your irrelevant remark, I will be the better man and simply say this. What you said is true, but that does not mean I was mistaken. The issues that caused the concept to be formed, as well at altered later on, are quite various and difficult to simplify into a single answer. Hence, why history shows that I am true, as well as you. If you wish to disregard what I said, go ahead. I will not drop to your level.
@smokethosetaliban So in essence, the people were viewed as seemingly unintelligent and easily swayed, so they were not given direct vote in regard to the president. It is a trend that just like in the past, carries true to the present.
As for the debate, it is very dependent on who it is that I would be debating with. There are many that know and have studied to a greater extend then I have, and as such, there are many that have not. I will not dignify what else you said with a response.
@tiitytat And what is this garbage of being an enemy of the United States and the constitution? Just how much experience have you had studying the constitution? How many courses have you taken that has gone into detail line by line, going through what is claimed to have been said and what is not said? Oh please, do not even think for a second you are even close to my level. You step on it [constitution] and use it at your whim, you should be ashamed. It is not your play-thing or toy.
@XioNilrem -Oh please just shut up. What, is there now a video game that plays the Constitution? Glad to see you think so highly of yourself since it surely has to be lonely in that room. One needs only to read your post to identify you as a liberal child with no skin in the game.....just a big mouth.
@steelersX01 That was quite intelligent of you to say, you take something from one's profile and then try to use that to belittle a point being made. So, since you are surely better then I am and would never make claims without backing them. Here is a question, what have I said that shows that I am a liberal? I would like specifics, since you have made a claim that I am tied to a specific political party and I want you to prove it. Otherwise, you are just like the rest and mere empty claims.
If you are going to make anyone believe that you are any different from the rest of the people on here, you might want to stray away from red herrings if you false claims. I can easily to go on to say that you are [fill in blank] and it would hold as much weight as what you have said already.
@XioNilrem -Not my goal game boy. I don't care about anybody on here and I also don't feel a need to let anyone know that I feel superior to them as witnessed in several of your posts. You are just pissed that you have been easily nailed as an obamaite. Are you going to deny voting for the zero man and and being a liberal game boy?
@steelersX01 For someone to have been "easily nailed" as anything, there would have to be proof. I am sort of disappointed in you, I had considered that you were any different from the other bloke that did not have anything of real substance to add. Alas, you are but the very same. I had a simple request, prove what you claimed to be true. Where have I shown to be an "Obamaite", or a liberal, or any of the sort? If you make a claim, prove it. If it is so obvious, then point it out, not too hard.
@XioNilrem You seriously need a life. Get your cock out of your hand and go get laid. There are shemales out there just like Michael Obama that will fuck you in the ass for just pennies. Damn, you are too easy. hahahaha, loser.
@tiitytat I am shocked, I did not think you could get any lower and in the end, you did. Why don't you actually try something actually witty, or try to actually argue something or merit. You must think you are quite bright but in the end, you are still nothing. Well, I am done wasting my time on garbage like you. As you are beneath me and a squirming little worm that you are, I will not bother to reply unless you have something relevant to say. You disgust, failure as a human being.
@XioNilrem Boohoo, you scum sucking liberal communist. Go fuck your mother again. Or better yet your sister. You worthless piece of unhuman flesh. Go vote for killing more babies by holding them half way out of the womb, turning them over and stabbing scissors into the back of their skull. Anybody that votes for democrats is a baby killer. Take a deep look at what you live your life supporting. Don't you dare judge me you intolerant ignorant fuck. God is the final judge and you will lose
Obama and his minions want the censorship doctrine because they know lib talk radio and shows flop! It is the only way if they FORCE their views on the airwaves, and also since radio is a free market, the stations would be FORCED to air lib talk shows, thus hurting the advertising radio market because conservative talk radio is very popular and advertisers are willing to pay to air on their programs, but not lib talk radio.
Olbermann's rating were so low, this was just an excuse to get rid of him. His behavior during MSNBC's election coverage was an embarrassment. The only program on that network that is even remotely neutral is Joe Scarborough Morning Joe but even that is scripted and rarely challenges the parade of left-wing hacks and mocks the tea party movement.
All Olbermann ever did was sneer and make fun of people. Which is typical of the far-left liberals at MSNBC. They can't articulate or defend their position so they make personal attacks, laugh and demonize others.
All Olbermann ever did was sneer and make fun of people. Which is typical of the far-left liberals at MSNBC. They can't articulate or defend their position so they make personal attacks, laugh and demonize others.
Olbermann was probably suspended because of his ratings. His show is NOT a news show. It's an opinion show that promotes only a liberal agenda with a sarcastic style. Suspending him like he is a hard news analysis is a hoax. Only left wing drones believe otherwise.
@awn263 Not 24 hours but Hannity and O'Reilly don't pretend they're doing hard news like all of those libtards at MSLSD. If you had bothered to watch those shows or the analysis portion of the newscasts, you'll see some libs...like that Juan Williams guy who isn't with PBS. Of course you might "feel" Eugene Robinson is a conservative. :))
Why the hell can networks and individuals make campaign contributions, and he can't???? It's certainly not fair, and I'd like an explaination from NBC on why this could happen!
@awn263 -- You want an explanation on why this was done?
NBC was recently taken over by Comcast - about the most right-wing company in America & the company & its execs have made millions in contributions to Republican candidates.
It is partly owned by the Mormon Church & they're influential in the company.
Thus in the coming yr ppl will be fired at NBC & replaced by ultra-conservatives.
NBC & FOX will be working together to elect Romney in 2012 as he'll be a good CORPORATE WHORE.
Yes, believe me you will never hear a liberal extend the same curtsy to a conservative about freedom of speech. To a liberal, freedom of speech is only words they want to hear all other opinions must be shut up.
@tiitytat Poster child (and yes, I consider you a child intellectually) for the hypocrites that thrive on people's misfortune and lacking any sense of integrity of restraint. One can truly see the limitations of someones intellect when they so easily resort to gross and inaccurate generalizations.
I know this is asking a lot out of you all, but have you no decency? Are people so intellectually stunted that they resort to mere laughable and grotesque name calling, like children. Grow up.
@tiitytat It truly is sad to see someone so desperate to troll, that the person would be willing to drop to such a level. It is quite pitiful to see someone with such little pride in themselves and lacking in any confidence in yourself. When I see someone like you, I feel sorry. I feel sorry because I know how limited you are, I know how insecure you are, and how much attention you crave like a child throwing a tantrum. You poor child, you poor troll. Such a disappointment as a human being.
@XioNilrem Still, keep voting for abortion because you are killing the ignorant, intolerant liberal gene pool. Survival of the fittest and unethical, immoral and unarmed liberals lose!
@tiitytat I am amazed that you can go on to reply and still be so completely wrong. You are the very reason why there should be a restriction on those who can reply, you must have a certain level of intelligence and sensibility. That way, we can do away with the weak minded people such as yourself. You made many claims, all of which have yet to be backed or proven. I guess you can only rely on empty claims, you have nothing else.
Also, you should learn something about ethics before you speak.
Well it's difficult to be objective or even claim it when you're obviously funding one side and it goes against reporter's ethics. Interesting to see how long they have the balls to hold out on this. He could always go to work for NPR because their not biased at all.
LOL! Keith Olbermann never reported a fact in his life. I can't count the times when I've seen him piece sections of video together to make them say what he wanted them to say. He did it when the unedited versions were right here on YouTube.
That sleazy idiot wouldn't know a fact if one hit him in the face.
@qpwillie I don't subscribe to cable or satellite because I refuse to give money to the news media that is contributing to the intolerance of the liberal masses. I saw this fool one time and all I heard was pure hatred spewed out about anything he didn't believe in. He is a typical intolerant, self entitled, immoral and unethical liberal part of an self proclaimed elitist group that hates what the USA was founded on. Anybody that hates America as much as liberals should get the fuck out.
Just because a cat has her kittens in the oven, that doesn't make them biscuits. Just like just being born in America doesn't make someone a true American.
The reason for suspension is petty. That means Keith isn't valued by MSNBC management. I agree, he's toxic. Keith treats conservatives like idiots so they won't watch him even for entertainment value. That over the top attitude also turns off indies. They need to find a center left O'reilly to replace Olbermann's time slot.
@espinoza2110 so we're fucking idiots? And that coming from another welfare recipient getting fat off all the working people. yes we are idiots for allowed you worthless lazy bastards to live off our hard work.
We do have high hopes of ending all that, and go the way of, you don't work you don't eat.
@MrSTANDFORAMERICA If we could just only kill all of those welfare programs for the stupid poor fucks that won't work. Not the ones that can't but the ones that just plain won't work. Liberals hate corporations, but oh SNAP, corporations provide jobs. Oh wait a second, maybe we should like corporations? Geee, how do liberals remember to breath if they are so stupid.
@espinoza2110 Let's see all the republicans I know can shoot pretty well, most of them own their own companies or are at the top of their field, well educated and successful. The only liberals I know are the two dead guys I killed that broke into my house trying to rob and possible kill my family. Yeah, who's stupid?
@tiitytat you and republicans... american whats your power? is it realy money? you gots lots of money so what? who ever is right is stronger..... like i said republicans are fucking idiots, no their retarded
Obermann put his career on the line for Democrats???? What the hell did he do that for - they're no different to the Bush's gang.
MaxTallon 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
olby fuck you fuck your mother fuck your father for having you die die die die you cock sucker suck a fat [palin moose cock !!
prezobummer 1 year ago
Obermann is fasle resistance they say.
Ranlon 1 year ago
lol, gotta love olbermann. he actually thinks he knows what he's talking about.
winikten1 1 year ago
@winikten1
You again? Did I not just school you in the other video regarding Keith Olbermann's suspension?
Have I not made my point clear that Fox News is the worst piece of shit that passes itself off as a legitimate news station? Sure MSNBC can be criticized as the carbon copy of Fox News but Liberal, however the difference in the two is that while Fox News practice cheap dirty methods to sway their viewers (see 'Clinton sets the record straight' on youtube) MSNBC uses actual facts.
Roshby54 1 year ago
@Roshby54 Ummm, you have no point, and if you read my reply to your other post, you were destroyed.
MSNBC only quotes facts that fit its liberal agenda. last time i checked MSNBC doenst have conserv. contributors. one side only. you couldnt school a 5th grader because your knowledge of history is pathetic at best. just like every lib. you say nothing of value then claim a "victory". you probably dont even watch fox news, and just spew the filth that the left wing wants you to believe.
winikten1 1 year ago
@winikten1
I will agree that MSNBC do show Liberals in the better light, and there aren't many Conservative contributors. But Fox makes it appear to be a chore when they have left wing guests on their channel. Condescending tones, abrupt cut offs, and (if you saw the Clinton/Fox video) one way questions. My knowledge of history is pathetic? Try again. We're not talking about history, but politics. We're not talking about the 20th century here.
Roshby54 1 year ago
@Roshby54 at least fox gives them an opportunity to state their views, and let the LISTENERS decide who's correct. on the MSM, the listener doesnt get that choice. that's why fox kicks ALL their asses in the ratings. and you dont think the MSM serves up softballs to the liberals? gimme a break. they NEVER ask the tough questions, and just let them serve up their canned BS answers.
winikten1 1 year ago
@Roshby54 and how's your boy obama working out for you, rofl. unemployment way above a level he said it wouldnt reach, massive explosion of debt that hasnt done ANYTHING to help the economy, failed policy after failed policy, diplomatic relations in turmoil, a completely botched oil spill, rampant corruption with marxists in abundance, trampling of the constitution. should i go on? keep your head in the sand. when it comes all comes tumbling down, we'll see how you feel about the annointed 1
winikten1 1 year ago
@winikten1
Don't tell me that you're really going to insult Obama for not being able to bring the USA back after YOUR FUCKING REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT SPENT 8 LONG YEARS DIGGING US UNDER. You want to talk about the economy? Let's talk about how all of our taxpayers money went towards an unnecessary war in the middle east under false pretenses, claiming it was for WMD's. You want to talk about a botched oil spill? How about the horrible incompetent reaction to Katrina? I can go on as well pal.
Roshby54 1 year ago
@Roshby54 bring the US back? are you fucking kidding me? he's driven it even deeper in to a hole than bush EVER did. he spent $1 trillion dollars to stimulate the economy, and its gotten WORSE. he's racked up more debt than any other president ever, with NOTHING to show for it. and there you go again. you cant talk about how big a failure obama is without talking about bush. BUSH IS NO LONGER IN OFFICE. WHEN IS OBAMA RESPONSIBLE FOR HIS OWN ACTIONS? GET OFF BUSH'S NUTS ALREADY!
winikten1 1 year ago
Comment removed
Roshby54 1 year ago
@winikten1
And I'm going to be dead honest with you. There are many things Obama has done that I'm not happy with (health care) but he is twice the better president than Bush could have ever been. Republicans are incompetent but my main point is that Fox News is nothing more than an advert for Republican politicians, giving misguided facts to a Republican fan base. You're looking past the faults your party made for 8 years and sneering at our attempts to fix your mistakes.
Roshby54 1 year ago
@Roshby54 who says im a rebublican? you're assumptions are misguided. ALMOST ALL of our politicians are worthless, including the bulk of the republicans. they are nothing more than a bunch of RINO's. spending money we dont have is killing this country, and Obaman has done more of that than any other president in american history, period. we have marxists sitting in the white house, and also in congress, and it's time for them ALL to go.
winikten1 1 year ago
@winikten1
Argumentam Ad Populum. That means your argument for fox is that since they get better ratings, then that must mean they're correct. And what kind of an opportunity? Enough for them to give one coherent statement until they get cut off by some biased commentator who is SO SURE that they're wrong? Fox does let the LISTENER decide who's correct and seeing as how THE ONLY AUDIENCE WHO WATCHES FOX ARE ALL RIGHT WING, OF COURSE THERES ONLY GOING TO BE ONE VICTOR BASED ON THEIR OPINION.
Roshby54 1 year ago
@Roshby54 your argument forgets one thing. if the people didnt want to watch fox, they wouldnt. so, by default, what your saying is, you're smarter than the majority of the country. typical progressive arrogance.
winikten1 1 year ago
@winikten1 It's simple. I brought Bush into the conversation because you were insulting Obama for not being able to bring the United States back from the deficit and for being incompetent on diplomatic relations, and that goddamn oil spill. I even admitted that I'm not his biggest fan, but you have to understand that he wasn't the one who started this whole clusterfuck of a mess. I assumed you are a Republican solely because you watch Fox and your responses to me haven't said otherwise.
Roshby54 1 year ago
@Roshby54 yep, i watch fox amongst other channels. i even watch the MSM to see what BS they are spewing. Im not insulting obama for not being able to bring us back from the deficit, im insulting him for making it WORSE than ANY president before him. when he campaigned he said he'd fix it. he said he'd bring change. what he's brought is WORSE problems than we've EVER seen before. he said unemployment wouldnt go over 8% with his stimulus. it went over 10%, then down to 9.5, and now back up.
winikten1 1 year ago
@Roshby54 the unemployment problem IS obama's fault. he made it WORSE. that's my point. dont drag bush in to this like its all HIS fault. its the fault of every administration since woodrow wilson, and obama is making more mistakes than ANY other president before him, not to mention, he's a marxist.
winikten1 1 year ago
@winikten1
My, you're ignorant. You pathetic conservative insect, were you not aware that Clinton's administration had balanced the deficit? And Bush's administration ruined it all with his idiotic policies. Were you not aware that the economic downfall was originally predicted to be much, much worse? What the pitiful, diseased lump in your head that you mistake for a brain has failed to realize is that Obama has kept the economy from getting even worse.
Kageryushin 3 months ago
@Kageryushin yes, clinton balanced the budget...but he also created a massive housing bubble with his "everyone gets a home" policy, pressuring banks to give mortgages to people that shouldnt have gotten them. that bubble burst during bush's term.
obama has done nothing to improve our economy. his own prediction was that spending $1 trillion dollars on the stimulus would keep unemployment under 8%. it hasnt been under 9% in over 2 years...he's a lying marxist POS.
winikten1 3 months ago
Comment removed
winikten1 1 year ago
@Roshby54 agreed!
fatfreegirl1 1 year ago
@winikten1
I can't believe I forgot to mention this. I already proved that if Obama was bad for his response on the oil spill, Bush was horrible for his failure with Katrina. But were you aware that the oil spill occurred due to lack of safety regulations that started under Bush? Let's think about that for a second.
Diplomatic relations in turmoil? There are two main countries who hate us:
North Korea and Iran
Bush messed that up. Not Obama.
Go on, give me more ammunition why don't you?
Roshby54 1 year ago
@Roshby54 umm, WTF does bush have to do with this conversation. now i KNOW you're a progressive, because that's all progressives can say is "well, bush did this, this, and this." bush has NOTHING to do with the fact that obama is a marxist, and is trying to ruin this country. bush made PLENTY of mistakes.
bush is out of office. when is obama going to accept responsibility?
you have no ammo, you're shooting in the dark. obama has completely weakened our position across the world.
winikten1 1 year ago
thank you for coming back those idiots think that they can bring you down
gsm73 1 year ago
I refused to watch this video because it forces me to watch shitty advertising.
Skavar4000 1 year ago
true story" laura ingrahm dumped this guy because she walked in on him sucking the cock of a nfl player. now you know why he is so pro-homo, pro-black and muslim asslicker
salem293 1 year ago
NBC finally unvails Olbermann's unscrupulous personal character.
retusyllib 1 year ago
Why are people so shocked about this? This is common practice. The only crime Keith committed was that he got caught.
chessarama 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
YAHOOOOO Kitty Oberfuhrer gets kicked in the butt by his/ her/ its own cronies, much like the repudiation of Obama's Fruit and Nut Company !!! 2012 Here we come, Ready or not !!!
Eadhmonn 1 year ago
YAHOOOOO Kitty Oberfuhrer gets kicked in the butt by his/ her/ its own cronies, much like the repudiation of Obama's Fruit and Nut Company !!! 2012 Hre we come, Ready or not !!!
Eadhmonn 1 year ago
Olbergoebles and mad cow need ratings , it's all about numbers . The death spiral of the lamestream media continues. Maybe they can get out of those stupid contracts . Couldn't be any worse than Alan Colmes. Being stupid is controversial.
mikewm9v 1 year ago
renatasequoia-Everything you say is wrong. The 1st job of every business, including the news "business", is to make $-not perform charitable services for society. Over $650million in annual funding goes to, not just CPB(which feeds PBS & NPR), but hundreds of millions of that goes to individual PBS & NPR stations as programming grants--a huge govt subsidy which is never mentioned by proponents of public broadcasting so as to disguise the true size of govt support. U R just uninformed/naive.
smokethosetaliban 1 year ago
@smokethosetaliban Federal Government supports for PBS =15% of network budget. Way too small to ease PBS need for corporate underwriting.
With more than 70% of its prime-time shows funded wholly or in major part by 4 giant oil companies, PBS has become known as the "Petroleum Brodcasting System"
Example: British Petroleum is a underwriter of the The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer.Effect; soft pedaled news presented re; oil spill caused by BP being regular corporate sponsor of 5-night a week program
renatasequoia 1 year ago
Having said that about PBS conflict of interest I have to say that PBS present far better, more professional, and more objective news than Fox News, CNN and other main TV news.
Why? Because is non-profit, less dependent from corporate sponsors and advertisers. Although, lacking adequate funds and staff PBS cannot be totally independent like PUBLICLY owned BBC - one of the best media outlets in the word.
renatasequoia 1 year ago
@renatasequoia You say--"Having said that about PBS conflict of interest I have to say that PBS present far better, more professional, and more objective news than Fox News, CNN and other main TV news.
Why? Because is non-profit, less dependent from corporate sponsors and advertisers. "---typical lib...you want it both ways. PBS is unbiased because they are unbeholdened to corporations---and---they are not a govt news outlet since a "small" part of their budget is grants. Make up your mind
smokethosetaliban 1 year ago
@renatasequoia I guess I could say it over and over and you , out of blind love for big govt, would never get it...but here it is again. The "network budget" numbers you heaved up do not include the other huge channel of money into public broadcasting...that is grants given directly to stations. You govt lovers ALWAYS leave that out--as part of your ignorance or dishonesty(pick one). And you are brainwashed if you think PBS/NPR isn't just as one-sided as any other outlet. You are an NPR tool.
smokethosetaliban 1 year ago
@smokethosetaliban No."Blind love" for the govmt is as dangerous as "blind love" for corporations & "perfect markets".
I see that you see the world and problems in black and white. That is why you accuse your opponents to be the negative copy of yourself. I see that you love to twist words of others. I've never said that PBS is NEVER influenced by large donors, quite the contrary.
But I've also said that PBS is still BETTER than Fox, because in many cases is not SO MUCH influenced as Fox.
renatasequoia 1 year ago
@smokethosetaliban You are really arrogant "intelectual" a la Sarah Palin
You like to smear people without presenting facts and reasons.
If I was wrong it would be easy to prove, by showing the accurate numbers.
But you rather accuse people that they "heave" numbers. Exactly like Glen Beck. You don't have the slightest clue what I "love" but you "know" for sure, just because you've said so.. NPR is "ALWAYS one-sided" but give me a reason why Fox is not?
Try some reasoning instead of insults
renatasequoia 1 year ago
@renatasequoia you are a whiner and you have a short memory. You cry that I am all insults, yet our first words to one another started with you calling me "dumbass". Review our posts over the last several days to see how I challenged your BS with facts and you left every challenge of mine unanswered--such as: % of govt funding for PBS&NPR is higher than you said--then you say "Because PBS is non-profit, less dependent from corporate sponsors and advertisers", it is "more objective"->>>>>>>>>>>>>
smokethosetaliban 1 year ago
@smokethosetaliban gee,you act like a child."dumbass is not my word, so you made it up like many things...
So far you do not show better numbers and reliable sources.
renatasequoia 1 year ago
@renatasequoia I made it up? Go back & see the first word of your first post to me--then tell me who is making things up like a child. & you managed to latch onto a poll naming PBS as the most trusted(before, you said they were bought and paid for by BP, but now you like them again). Funny how such a tiny few watch or get their news from PBS as compared to FNC. While PBS grovels for sponsors, Fox is awash in advertising revenues meaning the people have voted--with their remotes--theres ur poll
smokethosetaliban 1 year ago
@smokethosetaliban Here are some facts and reasons for my previous statements:
" Feb.2010 Americans have named PBS the most trusted and unbiased institution among nationally known organizations, the most trusted source of news and public affairs among broadcast and cable sources,& the most educational media brand for children according to new national polls
The research was conducted in Dec 2009 and Jan. 2010 by the non-partisan, international research company GfK Roper Public Affairs & Media
renatasequoia 1 year ago
@renatasequoia SO WHICH IS IT?1> PBS is objective cuz it is largely govt funded--Again, here's your quote--""Because PBS is non-profit, less dependent from corporate sponsors and advertisers", it's "more objective" , --OR--, 2>only !!15%!! of the PBS budget is govt funds ...again, here is a quote from you--"PBS is mainly sponsored by corporations and public,not government".-- Looks like you want ur cake and eat it 2--every time you write, you mess in your own nest> Cmon --which is it?
smokethosetaliban 1 year ago
welcome back olbermann...we miss you...you are a genius...just cuz food and cartoon networks are rated higher than msnbc means nothing...its not about ratings...its about the truth and noone delivers truth like you...fox news only cares about making money...you guys obviously don't care about that since only .03% of Americans watch you...
smokethosetaliban 1 year ago
WELCOME BACK OLBERMANN
n8tivguitar 1 year ago
Oh and just to let everyone know, Keith Olbermann has been reinstated and will return to the air on Tuesday night.
XioNilrem 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@XioNilrem "Oh and just to let everyone know, Keith Olbermann has been reinstated and will return to the air on Tuesday night."--oh, great...thanks for the bulletin...I'll get a cheeseball and a 12pack ...you bring the little smokies!
smokethosetaliban 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@XioNilrem --"Oh and just to let everyone know, Keith Olbermann has been reinstated and will return to the air on Tuesday night."-----Oh great...thanks for the bulletin. I'll get a cheeseball and a 12pack...you bring the little smokies...
smokethosetaliban 1 year ago
FoxNews Alert : The great Keith Olbermann's suspension is being lifted by MSNBC next Tuesday. ........I told you Olbermann haters that he would be back. Eat crow , Repukes. Ah Ha Ha Ha Ha !
c588414 1 year ago
@c588414 yep, publicity stunt. No surprise, I guess except for you.
tiitytat 1 year ago
@tiityboy, you're not going to start crying like Rep. Johnny"Orange"Boner, or Glen Beck, are you? Stunt are not, you neocon teabaggers got hoodwinked, and welcome back Mr. Olbermann.
c588414 1 year ago
@c588414 Who got hoodwincked? "teabaggers" just changed the political landscape for at least a generation by helping republicans sweep state legislatures, govenorships, county boards and commisions, judgeships, and every other nook and cranny beneath national offices. Redistricting nationwide will only amplify these gains in the next four election cycles as Obama singlehandedly smothers the life out of your party. YOU GOT HOODWINKED--BY OBAMA. And you can have Olby and his canoe-full of viewers!
smokethosetaliban 1 year ago
@smokeyourownturd, please accept my humble apology for offending you neocon Teabaggers. A teabagger, like yourself, is one who is eager to please. You people gladly drop to your knees, part your pouty lips, and open your mouth's wide enough so any man, especially a neocon, can dip their nutsack in your awaiting mouth. The reason why I shy away from you teabaggers is because you all lie a lot and your breath stinks.
c588414 1 year ago
@c588414 I understand your frustration...give it twenty years and maybe your party will get another chance...
smokethosetaliban 1 year ago
Its about time! Take a hike Keith and don't let the door hit you in the back-side on your way out!
skydiver1013 1 year ago
UPDATED: Before Bush Donor Takeover Of MSNBC, Network Selectively Applies Rules To Suspend Olbermann
Comcast has finalized a deal to purchase a majority stake in NBC, awaits final approval of the takeover from the Justice Department.
Once Comcast gains final approval from federal regulators to move forward, Comcast COO Steve Burke, a Bush fundraiser, will be placed at the helm of MSNBC and other NBC companies
Have a nice Democracy America! Good luck!
renatasequoia 1 year ago
@renatasequoia Yeah,dumbass...democracy was in such good hands with dan rather and olberman and npr and pbs and katie couric and matt lauer and charlie gibson ...yeah right. Maybe now the news business can do what a business is supposed to do...make money...attract viewers...things that Fox's competition has failed/forgotten how to do. Or maybe you prefer that all news be supplied by the govt via hundreds of millions/billions of $ from govt grants like CPB/PBS/NPR>THAT'S goodbye democracy
smokethosetaliban 1 year ago
@smokethosetaliban "Dumbass.."Yeah". Hmm..I can see; your "debate" is on very high level; that's why you think ' news busines' role is to "make money..attract viewers.. etc.
I think the role of %TV news is to INFORM and show real problems. Also: TEACH and EXPLAIN with assistance of real experts. PBS is mainly sponsored by corporations and public,not government. I am for PUBLIC media like BBC, which is sponsored mainly by viewers, not govmt.
BBC is one of the best media in the world, not FOX.
renatasequoia 1 year ago
@renatasequoia ur a socialist...with no clue about business or the true scope of public funding for media
smokethosetaliban 1 year ago
@smokethosetaliban Oh,really? I "have no clue" because I presented argument using facts,examples and reason.You show of with name calling.
I am a "socialist" because I am against one sided corporate TV news which show the only one point of view, and only from the CONSERVATIVE perspective. Example? Tax cuts. Most Fox news viewers have no clue that many Republicans and businessmen are against tax cuts for the rich. U have no clue who sponsors PBS.
Maybe next time you use reson in this debate
renatasequoia 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Liberalism is a mental disorder.
LussyPickerr 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Liberalism is a mental disorder.
LussyPickerr 1 year ago
MSNBC has suspended star anchor Keith Olbermann for donated to 3 candidates this election.
NBC policy does NOT prohibit employees from donating to political candidates – which would be unconstitutional.
Meanwhile, Republicans Joe Scarborough and Pat Buchanan also gave political contributions, but are not suspended. We've had enough insanity this week.
Sign a petition here:
" Put Olbermann Back on the Air Now! "
renatasequoia 1 year ago
@renatasequoia -- NBC has been taken over by Comcast (an extreme right-wing company)
If Olbermann is allowed back in, they will still replace him w/ a Hannity or Beck type during the next \year.
The Mormon Church has an interest in Comcast & I look for them to be pushing Romney.
DillonDee1 1 year ago
@renatasequoia
Keith Olbermann is a bozo. His show was so bad that with out Glen Beck to rag on for the Libtards, he would have no viewers.
skydiver1013 1 year ago
@renatasequoia
I wouldn't mind if they did put him back on. He's one of the reasons we were able to take over the House Of Representatives. Olbermann's lies and he and all the others accusing us of racism, otherwise slandering us, insulting our intelligence etc. played a big part in our victory. We can use all that kind of help we can get because we're just ready to begin now.
qpwillie 1 year ago
Wow, look at these comments. Look at the hatred that followed Olbermann. Soldiers are fighting and dying for their freedoms to hate America the way that they do. No wonder we have a muslim terrorist usuper pretending to be president. How sad. No love for the USA, only hate and intolerance.
tiitytat 1 year ago
BYE BYE Olbermann you sorry ass sucks
denbar 1 year ago
@denbar No doubt. You can only spread intolerance and hatred for so long. Liberals are all going down. Enough is enough.
tiitytat 1 year ago
How about that Olbermann getting his sorry ass kicked of MSNBC without pay...lol That really made my day.
denbar 1 year ago
News is bullshit. The only way to know about a politician is to check his background and his voting record. For Hussein Obama, his background proves he is a muslim terrorist, a fundamental communist, funded by a muslim prince, studied primarily marxism throughout school, raised by a muslim communist, born in Kenya, never proved citizenship, voted for stabbing babies in the back of the skull killing them and present for everything else. Oh, and is a racist fuck.
tiitytat 1 year ago
Being that olbermann spewed more hate than all non-msnbc hosts combined it's surprising they let him go this long.
The news is how few people who don't live in their parents basements care.
independentview1 1 year ago
Hypocryte exposed. He cried like as stuck donkey when Fox News Owners contributed to a Republican Governor campaign fund. So they are bad for disclosing their contributions,why Olbermann is good and he hides them.
Nice.
harry4now 1 year ago
They said he started out as a host of a "straight news program". That's impossible. MSNBC has never had a "straight news program". They have never been anything but a left wing propaganda agency.
qpwillie 1 year ago
Haha! The Republican Revolution of November 2 not only got rid of Democrats but also bias idiot News casters like Olbermann. Hahaha! Go sit with you friend Rick Sanchez in the unemployment office. Join your fellow out work Democrat buddies. Haha!
Death2Fanboys 1 year ago
@Death2Fanboys Now we just need to get rid of the rest of the biased casters, so pretty much all of Fox would be gone, MSNBC, and about 3/4 of CNN as well. I think that would be pretty fair, maybe we can finally get real news and not the garbage most people spew. A bit tired of seeing them appeal to people's ignorance and it actually work, oh how simple minded people can be.
XioNilrem 1 year ago
@XioNilrem You are the definition of simple minded. Anybody that supports Hussein Obama is brain dead.
tiitytat 1 year ago
@tiitytat Kid, you have no clue just how out of your league you truly are. Your fallacious pseudo arguments do nothing but show that you have nothing relevant to say. You have nothing of substance, you cannot rely on using reason, logic, or the facts for that matter. You really do need to grow up kid, you are the type of person that truly hurts and hinders the United States. Shame you don't care for your country much, otherwise you wouldn't be such an eyesore and disappointment.
XioNilrem 1 year ago
@XioNilrem Well, you sure are interested in what I have to say, aren't you. Hahaha. Keep killing the liberal gene pool! Thank you for that. Keep voting for idiots with no governing experience. Yeah, I have no clue, yeah no facts. Did you even ever look at your messiahs record? NO, didn't think so. Did you even look at who financed his scholastic career? No, didn't think so. Do you even care? No, you don't because you are an enemy of the USA and the constitution.I bet you reply again.
tiitytat 1 year ago
@tiitytat I am shocked, I would like to congratulate you on being correct for the first time. I did reply, just like you predicted. It is a shame though that most of what you said are all false and empty claims (as usual). But you can at least say you were correct on one point. You are a joke, you are exactly the reason why the founding fathers set up the voting system as they did, they knew the common peoples intelligence could never be trusted to directly vote in a President.
XioNilrem 1 year ago
@XioNilrem I was intrigued enough by your quarrel w/tiitytat to review your posts and found this by you--". You are a joke, you are exactly the reason why the founding fathers set up the voting system as they did, they knew the common peoples intelligence could never be trusted to directly vote in a President." --Guess what... you are at least lacking in understanding about the intentions of the founding fathers and would likely lose a serious debate about the role of govt, constitution,etc.
smokethosetaliban 1 year ago
@smokethosetaliban He's a fucking faggot and a stalker. The fag won't leave me alone.
tiitytat 1 year ago
@smokethosetaliban Are you being serious? If you looked to why the electoral college was implemented, it would be clear that one (of a few) reason why was because there was distrust in the judgment of the people. Since people are quite easily swayed by how one speaks and not what one speaks, this is meant to act to circumvent peopled from in a sense, being swept off their feet.
it was also meant to give the States some power and influence in the elections as well.
XioNilrem 1 year ago
@XioNilrem You are mistaken about the circumstances leading to the creation of the electoral college...it was certainly not a concern by the founders that "common peoples intelligence could not be trusted" as you say. That is, in fact, a contradiction to the sentiments of the founders. It was, first and foremost, a concern about larger, more populous states having a disproportionate impact on the coice for president and a concern about foriegn influence. Your cheap shot landed in your own bunker
smokethosetaliban 1 year ago
@smokethosetaliban Cheap shot? Have you even read what Alexander Hamilton stated in regard to the process? "It was equally desirable, that the immediate election should be made by men most capable of analyzing the qualities adapted to the station... A small number of persons, selected by their fellow-citizens from the general mass, will be most likely to possess the information and discernment requisite to such complicated investigations.
XioNilrem 1 year ago
@XioNilrem In an age when transfer of information was primitive, the notion of citizens electing other ordinary citizens to travel to capitols to gather information not readily and speedily available to the masses in rural areas was not in any way a judgement about the intelligence of those masses but a practicality of the times. Had Hamilton felt the masses ill-equipped to make intelligent decisions, he surely would not have designed a system wherein the electors were harvested from those same
smokethosetaliban 1 year ago
@smokethosetaliban I do not agree with that claim, for one of the main points of in peoples ability to be swayed or the possibility of coercion. It is not that the information is out there, but whether or not the citizens will seek out such knowledge. The idea that fear mongering, sympathy, and quite grotesque (and possibility of flawed political ads) only shows that a large portion are being manipulated.
XioNilrem 1 year ago
@smokethosetaliban Also, looking at the timeframe and when this was conceievd. It is not hard to believe that he (and various other poltiiczal figures) had a rather, unpleasant view of the general masses. And while having that, would have the system in such a way. It was to allow (and hope for) that the intellectuals could be nominated, giving the citizens a sense of freedom to choose. While not resorting to having a rather, tyrannical king like system where the people have zero say.
XioNilrem 1 year ago
@XioNilrem Hey, I appreciate the respectfull discussion--I just fundementally disagree with your interpretation. But I conceade that you are no pushover in a debate as I predicted earlier. I gotta get some sleep. Its been fun--do this again some time...take care...
smokethosetaliban 1 year ago
@smokethosetaliban Finally, nearly done replying and saying what I wanted to say. I appreciate your remarks and not resorting to fallacious arguments and knowing what you are talking about. We may have gotten off on the wrong foot but I did enjoy it. I am also glad that you did not consider me a pushover (although you could have mentioned that earlier, I do like being complimented haha), but you did a good job on your end. Take care and keep up the good work.
XioNilrem 1 year ago
@smokethosetaliban So as such, in having a middle area (allowing for the masses to have some say, while not having an actual direct say on the matter), they were allowed to have a sort of safe system. It does not focus on an extreme (either direct involvement by the citizens or none at all).
XioNilrem 1 year ago
@smokethosetaliban Cont. It was also peculiarly desirable to afford as little opportunity as possible to tumult and disorder. This evil was not least to be dreaded in the election of a magistrate, who was to have so important an agency in the administration of the government as the President of the United States. But the precautions which have been so happily concerted in the system under consideration, promise an effectual security against this mischief." - Alexander Hamilton
XioNilrem 1 year ago
@XioNilrem 1st--it was clearly nothing but a cheap shot by you against tiity...be honest about that and we can proceed...2nd--your interpretation of the Hamilton quote is definitely subject to debate as you did not include the first and opposing elements of his statement...i.e...."it was equally desirable"...etc. 3rd--there was anything but unanimity of opinion among his peers on this...4th--the electoral college underwent several iterations over time--5th--"possess the info"...not intelligence
smokethosetaliban 1 year ago
@smokethosetaliban Sorry but besides a reply to your point, I will not be talking about that lowlife. If someone accuses me of stalking while posting in a video I commented on in the past (a video about a guys dog he had to put down), and saying that I am a baby killer and that I killed my dog (that had to be put down), well I'd rather not give garbage like him any more attention then he already has.
XioNilrem 1 year ago
@XioNilrem Hey, ...perhaps you could understand how the quote about "intelligence of common people" would be offensive to most--especially those of us who abhore elitism and govt which pretends to know more than the governed. No intention by me to take sides on all that other stuff about your dog--sorry about your dog, BTW. You don't sound like a baby killer.
smokethosetaliban 1 year ago
@smokethosetaliban Elitism is a strange thing, as for myself, I look down to some degree on elitism (in particular, being knowledgeable on politics and the system) but on the other hand, I think its a necessity. We do not live in a world where everyone has equal education or intelligence. I hope that those who run the government are (in some respects) more intelligent than the masses. Like for presidents, I don't want someone who is just another guy, I want someone better then the average Joe.
XioNilrem 1 year ago
@smokethosetaliban I think I just have a negative outlook on the intelligence of most people. Which is probably quite clear from what I have said. I do thank you for your comment about my dog and the fact that you do not look to me as a baby killer.
XioNilrem 1 year ago
@smokethosetaliban Now, the bits I left out were done so because I did not really wish to have three replies worth of a quote, followed by a fourth comment on the actual substance. And yes, it did undergo several iterations which is what I also stated in my reply.
Finally, as for your comment last comment:" possess the information and discernment requisite to such complicated investigations" I would at least consider to some degree, that hints to knowledge (i.e. intelligence).
XioNilrem 1 year ago
@smokethosetaliban Alas, although you seem to wish to simply go after me with your irrelevant remark, I will be the better man and simply say this. What you said is true, but that does not mean I was mistaken. The issues that caused the concept to be formed, as well at altered later on, are quite various and difficult to simplify into a single answer. Hence, why history shows that I am true, as well as you. If you wish to disregard what I said, go ahead. I will not drop to your level.
XioNilrem 1 year ago
@smokethosetaliban So in essence, the people were viewed as seemingly unintelligent and easily swayed, so they were not given direct vote in regard to the president. It is a trend that just like in the past, carries true to the present.
As for the debate, it is very dependent on who it is that I would be debating with. There are many that know and have studied to a greater extend then I have, and as such, there are many that have not. I will not dignify what else you said with a response.
XioNilrem 1 year ago
@tiitytat And what is this garbage of being an enemy of the United States and the constitution? Just how much experience have you had studying the constitution? How many courses have you taken that has gone into detail line by line, going through what is claimed to have been said and what is not said? Oh please, do not even think for a second you are even close to my level. You step on it [constitution] and use it at your whim, you should be ashamed. It is not your play-thing or toy.
XioNilrem 1 year ago
@XioNilrem -Oh please just shut up. What, is there now a video game that plays the Constitution? Glad to see you think so highly of yourself since it surely has to be lonely in that room. One needs only to read your post to identify you as a liberal child with no skin in the game.....just a big mouth.
steelersX01 1 year ago
@steelersX01 That was quite intelligent of you to say, you take something from one's profile and then try to use that to belittle a point being made. So, since you are surely better then I am and would never make claims without backing them. Here is a question, what have I said that shows that I am a liberal? I would like specifics, since you have made a claim that I am tied to a specific political party and I want you to prove it. Otherwise, you are just like the rest and mere empty claims.
XioNilrem 1 year ago
@steelersX01
If you are going to make anyone believe that you are any different from the rest of the people on here, you might want to stray away from red herrings if you false claims. I can easily to go on to say that you are [fill in blank] and it would hold as much weight as what you have said already.
XioNilrem 1 year ago
@XioNilrem -Not my goal game boy. I don't care about anybody on here and I also don't feel a need to let anyone know that I feel superior to them as witnessed in several of your posts. You are just pissed that you have been easily nailed as an obamaite. Are you going to deny voting for the zero man and and being a liberal game boy?
steelersX01 1 year ago
@steelersX01 For someone to have been "easily nailed" as anything, there would have to be proof. I am sort of disappointed in you, I had considered that you were any different from the other bloke that did not have anything of real substance to add. Alas, you are but the very same. I had a simple request, prove what you claimed to be true. Where have I shown to be an "Obamaite", or a liberal, or any of the sort? If you make a claim, prove it. If it is so obvious, then point it out, not too hard.
XioNilrem 1 year ago
@XioNilrem You seriously need a life. Get your cock out of your hand and go get laid. There are shemales out there just like Michael Obama that will fuck you in the ass for just pennies. Damn, you are too easy. hahahaha, loser.
tiitytat 1 year ago
@tiitytat I am shocked, I did not think you could get any lower and in the end, you did. Why don't you actually try something actually witty, or try to actually argue something or merit. You must think you are quite bright but in the end, you are still nothing. Well, I am done wasting my time on garbage like you. As you are beneath me and a squirming little worm that you are, I will not bother to reply unless you have something relevant to say. You disgust, failure as a human being.
XioNilrem 1 year ago
@XioNilrem Boohoo, you scum sucking liberal communist. Go fuck your mother again. Or better yet your sister. You worthless piece of unhuman flesh. Go vote for killing more babies by holding them half way out of the womb, turning them over and stabbing scissors into the back of their skull. Anybody that votes for democrats is a baby killer. Take a deep look at what you live your life supporting. Don't you dare judge me you intolerant ignorant fuck. God is the final judge and you will lose
tiitytat 1 year ago
@XioNilrem Go kill babies like you did to your dog. Stupid asshole!
tiitytat 1 year ago
Olbermann was suspended for not following company policy and the company was right to do so ...GREAT RIDDANCE!
AngryStudioEngineer 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
MSNBC couldn't afford the electric bill for Olbermann's 480 volt butt plug.
Olbermann was just the beginning...
I don't plan, I just do... things...
I'm an agent of chaos. And you know what they say about chaos... It's the only thing that is fair.
How about a magic trick?
I'm going to make Rachel's pen disappear...
SirWinstonChurchill 1 year ago
CNN.....COMMUNIST NEWS NETWORK. NBC.....NOTHING BUT CRAP MSNBC....MORE SOCIALISM NEW BROADCASTING CORP. NPR...NATIONAL PROPAGANDA RADIO. CBS....COMMUNIST BROADCASTING CORP. ABC......ABOUT BRINGING COMMUNISM
newalm 1 year ago
Keith Olbermann was a typical arrogant liberal bastard!
newalm 1 year ago
Obama and his minions want the censorship doctrine because they know lib talk radio and shows flop! It is the only way if they FORCE their views on the airwaves, and also since radio is a free market, the stations would be FORCED to air lib talk shows, thus hurting the advertising radio market because conservative talk radio is very popular and advertisers are willing to pay to air on their programs, but not lib talk radio.
newalm 1 year ago
Bye bye Ogarmann! This is hilarious.
melardkey 1 year ago
Olbermann's rating were so low, this was just an excuse to get rid of him. His behavior during MSNBC's election coverage was an embarrassment. The only program on that network that is even remotely neutral is Joe Scarborough Morning Joe but even that is scripted and rarely challenges the parade of left-wing hacks and mocks the tea party movement.
phibes2 1 year ago
their yanking our democracy of the media.
AncientSpeech 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
All Olbermann ever did was sneer and make fun of people. Which is typical of the far-left liberals at MSNBC. They can't articulate or defend their position so they make personal attacks, laugh and demonize others.
BlackPantherChristie 1 year ago
All Olbermann ever did was sneer and make fun of people. Which is typical of the far-left liberals at MSNBC. They can't articulate or defend their position so they make personal attacks, laugh and demonize others.
BlackPantherChristie 1 year ago
Oh yeah, here we go with the Conspiracy theories, LMAO! Keith O broke the rules, he's a scumbag and deserved to be fired.
WildlyOptimistic1 1 year ago
Olbermann was probably suspended because of his ratings. His show is NOT a news show. It's an opinion show that promotes only a liberal agenda with a sarcastic style. Suspending him like he is a hard news analysis is a hoax. Only left wing drones believe otherwise.
roydu100 1 year ago
@roydu100 - Isn't that what Faux News does 24 hours of the day?
awn263 1 year ago
@awn263 Not 24 hours but Hannity and O'Reilly don't pretend they're doing hard news like all of those libtards at MSLSD. If you had bothered to watch those shows or the analysis portion of the newscasts, you'll see some libs...like that Juan Williams guy who isn't with PBS. Of course you might "feel" Eugene Robinson is a conservative. :))
roydu100 1 year ago
@roydu100 I have watched O'Reilly a couple of times for a laugh, but no way can I make it through a whole program.
Of course I hardly classify Obermann in the NEWS. He is a liberal guy that shares the same views as myself.
awn263 1 year ago
Why the hell can networks and individuals make campaign contributions, and he can't???? It's certainly not fair, and I'd like an explaination from NBC on why this could happen!
awn263 1 year ago 2
@awn263 -- You want an explanation on why this was done?
NBC was recently taken over by Comcast - about the most right-wing company in America & the company & its execs have made millions in contributions to Republican candidates.
It is partly owned by the Mormon Church & they're influential in the company.
Thus in the coming yr ppl will be fired at NBC & replaced by ultra-conservatives.
NBC & FOX will be working together to elect Romney in 2012 as he'll be a good CORPORATE WHORE.
DillonDee1 1 year ago 3
Comment removed
awn263 1 year ago
@DillonDee1 - So I suppose we've got another baby "Faux News" on the way?
awn263 1 year ago
@awn263 -- yes, since Comcast is taking over NBC - they'll turn it into another baby FAUX news.
DillonDee1 1 year ago
@awn263 -- Go on YouTube to "Al Franken Comcast" to see how he went after their lies.
I believe Al Franken was the only one on the Committee who didn't get bribes (I mean contributions) from Comcast as they knew he couldn't be bought.
And watch my prediction of how NBC under Comcast's ownership & FAUX will work together as a team to try to get Romney elected President.
They won't support Palin as she's a loose cannon & they know Romney will be a loyal Corporate Whore.
DillonDee1 1 year ago
He should sit on Whoopee's lap on "The View" now!
StompingRabbits 1 year ago 2
Yes, believe me you will never hear a liberal extend the same curtsy to a conservative about freedom of speech. To a liberal, freedom of speech is only words they want to hear all other opinions must be shut up.
vetteaok 1 year ago
C-Ya Olbermann! I hope the suspension runs to the year 2178. That works for me.
aSingleDallasGuy 1 year ago
How is this guy NBC's most popular news guy? Brian Williams is so much better than him.
swiftmonkey4 1 year ago
Comment removed
swiftmonkey4 1 year ago
Conservatives = make money, educated, successful
Liberals = take money, intolerant, welfare, GED hopefuls, naive, oh and STOOOOOOPID!
tiitytat 1 year ago
@tiitytat Poster child (and yes, I consider you a child intellectually) for the hypocrites that thrive on people's misfortune and lacking any sense of integrity of restraint. One can truly see the limitations of someones intellect when they so easily resort to gross and inaccurate generalizations.
I know this is asking a lot out of you all, but have you no decency? Are people so intellectually stunted that they resort to mere laughable and grotesque name calling, like children. Grow up.
XioNilrem 1 year ago
@XioNilrem Ha, laughable coming from a baby killer.
tiitytat 1 year ago
@tiitytat It truly is sad to see someone so desperate to troll, that the person would be willing to drop to such a level. It is quite pitiful to see someone with such little pride in themselves and lacking in any confidence in yourself. When I see someone like you, I feel sorry. I feel sorry because I know how limited you are, I know how insecure you are, and how much attention you crave like a child throwing a tantrum. You poor child, you poor troll. Such a disappointment as a human being.
XioNilrem 1 year ago
@XioNilrem Still, keep voting for abortion because you are killing the ignorant, intolerant liberal gene pool. Survival of the fittest and unethical, immoral and unarmed liberals lose!
tiitytat 1 year ago
@tiitytat I am amazed that you can go on to reply and still be so completely wrong. You are the very reason why there should be a restriction on those who can reply, you must have a certain level of intelligence and sensibility. That way, we can do away with the weak minded people such as yourself. You made many claims, all of which have yet to be backed or proven. I guess you can only rely on empty claims, you have nothing else.
Also, you should learn something about ethics before you speak.
XioNilrem 1 year ago
Typical liberal. Cowardly, intolerant, immoral, unethical, brain dead and just plain STOOOOOOOPID!
tiitytat 1 year ago
Well it's difficult to be objective or even claim it when you're obviously funding one side and it goes against reporter's ethics. Interesting to see how long they have the balls to hold out on this. He could always go to work for NPR because their not biased at all.
jsmmeyer2007 1 year ago
Nooooooo!! Where do I get my laughs now every night!!!!
bishopm5 1 year ago
Don't you right-wing idiots just hate it when t.v. personnel report facts instead of distorted truths and talking points.
ThaGenius101 1 year ago
@ThaGenius101 can't be talking about Olbermann, he only told his opinion.
MrSTANDFORAMERICA 1 year ago
@ThaGenius101
LOL! Keith Olbermann never reported a fact in his life. I can't count the times when I've seen him piece sections of video together to make them say what he wanted them to say. He did it when the unedited versions were right here on YouTube.
That sleazy idiot wouldn't know a fact if one hit him in the face.
qpwillie 1 year ago
@qpwillie I don't subscribe to cable or satellite because I refuse to give money to the news media that is contributing to the intolerance of the liberal masses. I saw this fool one time and all I heard was pure hatred spewed out about anything he didn't believe in. He is a typical intolerant, self entitled, immoral and unethical liberal part of an self proclaimed elitist group that hates what the USA was founded on. Anybody that hates America as much as liberals should get the fuck out.
tiitytat 1 year ago
@tiitytat
You got that right!
Just because a cat has her kittens in the oven, that doesn't make them biscuits. Just like just being born in America doesn't make someone a true American.
qpwillie 1 year ago
MSNBC is a republican co-whore media along with Saudi-owned Faux news.
ldkspardadeuce 1 year ago
LMAO NBC is so stupid it's like they enjoy fucking their corporation over.
eromattiffarg 1 year ago
The reason for suspension is petty. That means Keith isn't valued by MSNBC management. I agree, he's toxic. Keith treats conservatives like idiots so they won't watch him even for entertainment value. That over the top attitude also turns off indies. They need to find a center left O'reilly to replace Olbermann's time slot.
StormTrek 1 year ago
@StormTrek wtf you talkn about? conservatives are FUCKING IDIOTS!
espinoza2110 1 year ago
@espinoza2110 so we're fucking idiots? And that coming from another welfare recipient getting fat off all the working people. yes we are idiots for allowed you worthless lazy bastards to live off our hard work.
We do have high hopes of ending all that, and go the way of, you don't work you don't eat.
MrSTANDFORAMERICA 1 year ago
@MrSTANDFORAMERICA If we could just only kill all of those welfare programs for the stupid poor fucks that won't work. Not the ones that can't but the ones that just plain won't work. Liberals hate corporations, but oh SNAP, corporations provide jobs. Oh wait a second, maybe we should like corporations? Geee, how do liberals remember to breath if they are so stupid.
tiitytat 1 year ago
@MrSTANDFORAMERICA HA like i said republicans are idiots!
espinoza2110 1 year ago
@espinoza2110 Let's see all the republicans I know can shoot pretty well, most of them own their own companies or are at the top of their field, well educated and successful. The only liberals I know are the two dead guys I killed that broke into my house trying to rob and possible kill my family. Yeah, who's stupid?
tiitytat 1 year ago
@tiitytat you and republicans... american whats your power? is it realy money? you gots lots of money so what? who ever is right is stronger..... like i said republicans are fucking idiots, no their retarded
espinoza2110 1 year ago
@espinoza2110 Of course the are, now go back to your room before mummy discovers you used the computer again without her supervision.
StormTrek 1 year ago