@Detoyato My comment still stands. A hydrogen bomb is powered by fusion. The same process that takes place in the core of the sun. There is no more powerful force of nature. 25% of the Suns radius would envelop the entire earth many many times over. The human brain is not capable of understanding how much power the sun contains for there is nothing to compare it to. It's power is beyond comprehension. You're quoting Wikipidia which is inaccurate and I'm speaking from knowledge
This is what you get when you create a tiny piece of the Sun here on Earth. Our Sun is 1.3 million times larger than our entire planet and it is pure nuclear fusion that's lasted for 5 billion years. A power beyond comprehension. Our true God is our Sun
@solardutch "The device was trillions of times more powerful per unit volume in comparison to the material in the sun's fusion core (about 25% of the sun's radius) and it would take about 10 million years for an equivalent volume of the sun's core to produce the same amount of energy as came from within the bomb's casing."
Quote from the Wiki Article of the Tsar Bomb. We've actually beat the sun in Intensity and Efficiency albeit just for a fraction of a second.
@TheCoDMW2Beast 100.000 innocent people wasn't by any means necessary. Read the hole story and then comment. You look ghay (stupid).
Will you be ok when as you're shopping with your wife and kids, a freaking nuclear bomb blasts 500m above your head? I wouldn't.
Even if I were going to war, I'd still wouldn't be ok.
This wasn't the answer to Pearl Harbor (See the Manhattan Project). This was only a cheap solution. If they cared about your life, they wouldn't start a war.
@Nitrozzy7 I know the story asshole. What was the alternative? Invasion, costing us millions of lives as well as theirs? Most of their populace was willing to fight us tooth and nail to the death, and we would have had to kill them to stop them. And besides, the two atomic attacks together didnt kill as many people as the firebombing of Tokyo, or the firebombing of Dresden.
@Nitrozzy7 I would much rather see 100,000 civilains of an enemy country die than 2,000,000 of the soldiers in our own army. Regardless, the Japanese people, not just the military, were willing to die for their cause, not only costing 2,000,000 of our men but 15 to 20 million of their CIVILAINS. Research the war a bit man. The nuclear attacks were the way to go
"The nuclear attacks were the way to go." IMO no (as I stated earlier)... But who am I or you to judge? Those times were hard for the hole world. We (post war Generations) are the luckiest gens in history (war-wise).
@Nitrozzy7 Hey asshole ,fuck them 100,000,my grandfather is alive because of that bomb.He defeated hitler in italy and was scheduled to invade japan next.Wouldn't of mattered the 10th mountain division still would of fucked them up.Mountain men are truly free.
@everlandH8ter Last time I checked it was Russia, Britain, Sweden, Finland and various Rebels forces of occupied nations with the help of the US that defeated Hitler. And it didn't happened in Italy. Mussolini was in Italy not Hitler. Hitler's forces would be there only to support Italian troops.
Mountain men ARE truly free but I never called them assholes. You're making you grandpa very proud by calling me an asshole; At least that's what YOU must be thinking.
@everlandH8ter No you are wrong mussolini was all but defeated ,the africa corps chased the germans to siciliy then to italy where they stopped and set up in the mountains,the american forces fought the germans.the italian partisans dealt with mussolini and hung his ass by a meat hook in rome.The 10th mountain avanced farther and faster than any unit in europe ,and they had some of the highest casulties.Don't make asshole comments and i wont label you one.
@RoperFrenzy The un-remixed version, which i think is better, is called Requiem For a Dream By Clint Mansell, you can go into Audacity and edit it to fit a video for yourself too, so you don't have to have a remix.
A short but good compilation of nuclear explosions. Roperfrenzy, please tell me the name of that piece of music. I really dig it man...very appropriate.
"requiem for dream remix" yes it is a very good piece of music i heard it in another video and it left an impression on me for a couple weeks, so i had to put it in one of mine, thanks for the comment to :D
A nuclear bomb and an atomic bomb are virtually synonymous. The two terms are both used to refer to a nuclear weapon, atomic is just another name but it means nuclear it is called an atom bomb because it involves the splitting or fusing of atoms but fission and fusion are all classified as nuclear.
@Detoyato My comment still stands. A hydrogen bomb is powered by fusion. The same process that takes place in the core of the sun. There is no more powerful force of nature. 25% of the Suns radius would envelop the entire earth many many times over. The human brain is not capable of understanding how much power the sun contains for there is nothing to compare it to. It's power is beyond comprehension. You're quoting Wikipidia which is inaccurate and I'm speaking from knowledge
solardutch 1 hour ago
This is what you get when you create a tiny piece of the Sun here on Earth. Our Sun is 1.3 million times larger than our entire planet and it is pure nuclear fusion that's lasted for 5 billion years. A power beyond comprehension. Our true God is our Sun
solardutch 3 months ago
@solardutch "The device was trillions of times more powerful per unit volume in comparison to the material in the sun's fusion core (about 25% of the sun's radius) and it would take about 10 million years for an equivalent volume of the sun's core to produce the same amount of energy as came from within the bomb's casing."
Quote from the Wiki Article of the Tsar Bomb. We've actually beat the sun in Intensity and Efficiency albeit just for a fraction of a second.
Detoyato 1 day ago
Now we know why Enola turned gay.
Lieu3C4 10 months ago
see also video We've nuked ourselves already
ahamatmabrahman 10 months ago
I like to show these videos to Iranians ,and tell them this is what you want ,this is what you get.Boy does it piss them off.Muhahahaha
everlandH8ter 10 months ago
2:00 -
TZAR BOMBA
SHL101 1 year ago
@SHL101 Haha isn't that the biggest nuke ever created and wasn't it Russina?
KradiaKid 10 months ago
@KradiaKid Ya lol sorry for the late ass reply
SHL101 10 months ago
Comment removed
BiteTheBigOne2342 2 years ago
The high speed photography at 1:06 showing the fireball with rope trick appendages is amazing.
maxwell308 2 years ago
Nuke 'em 'til they glow... Then shoot them in the dark!
EtzEchad 2 years ago
power forever ! aleluya ..... !
hqnuclear 2 years ago
only the criminal government of the united states dared to use it on innocent civilians.
veryfuck 2 years ago
kind of neccesary, as an invasion of Japan would have cost millions of lives on both sides vs a 100 thousand
TheCoDMW2Beast 1 year ago
@TheCoDMW2Beast 100.000 innocent people wasn't by any means necessary. Read the hole story and then comment. You look ghay (stupid).
Will you be ok when as you're shopping with your wife and kids, a freaking nuclear bomb blasts 500m above your head? I wouldn't.
Even if I were going to war, I'd still wouldn't be ok.
This wasn't the answer to Pearl Harbor (See the Manhattan Project). This was only a cheap solution. If they cared about your life, they wouldn't start a war.
Nitrozzy7 1 year ago
@Nitrozzy7 I know the story asshole. What was the alternative? Invasion, costing us millions of lives as well as theirs? Most of their populace was willing to fight us tooth and nail to the death, and we would have had to kill them to stop them. And besides, the two atomic attacks together didnt kill as many people as the firebombing of Tokyo, or the firebombing of Dresden.
TheCoDMW2Beast 1 year ago
@TheCoDMW2Beast Well IMO, it's a lot better to kill 2.000.000 soldiers rather than 100.000 civilians.
U.S. government didn't want to see the Manhattan Project fail after all.
The attack on Pearl Harbor wouldn't had occur if it wasn't for the embargo of the U.S. to Japan.
Nevertheless, war is war and soldiers should be the ones that die. Otherwise theres no reason to pay all those taxes or join the army.
Nitrozzy7 1 year ago
@Nitrozzy7 I would much rather see 100,000 civilains of an enemy country die than 2,000,000 of the soldiers in our own army. Regardless, the Japanese people, not just the military, were willing to die for their cause, not only costing 2,000,000 of our men but 15 to 20 million of their CIVILAINS. Research the war a bit man. The nuclear attacks were the way to go
TheCoDMW2Beast 1 year ago
@TheCoDMW2Beast
"The nuclear attacks were the way to go." IMO no (as I stated earlier)... But who am I or you to judge? Those times were hard for the hole world. We (post war Generations) are the luckiest gens in history (war-wise).
Nitrozzy7 1 year ago
@Nitrozzy7 Hey asshole ,fuck them 100,000,my grandfather is alive because of that bomb.He defeated hitler in italy and was scheduled to invade japan next.Wouldn't of mattered the 10th mountain division still would of fucked them up.Mountain men are truly free.
everlandH8ter 10 months ago
@everlandH8ter Last time I checked it was Russia, Britain, Sweden, Finland and various Rebels forces of occupied nations with the help of the US that defeated Hitler. And it didn't happened in Italy. Mussolini was in Italy not Hitler. Hitler's forces would be there only to support Italian troops.
Mountain men ARE truly free but I never called them assholes. You're making you grandpa very proud by calling me an asshole; At least that's what YOU must be thinking.
5 y.o. Japan Kid had it coming.
Nitrozzy7 10 months ago
@everlandH8ter No you are wrong mussolini was all but defeated ,the africa corps chased the germans to siciliy then to italy where they stopped and set up in the mountains,the american forces fought the germans.the italian partisans dealt with mussolini and hung his ass by a meat hook in rome.The 10th mountain avanced farther and faster than any unit in europe ,and they had some of the highest casulties.Don't make asshole comments and i wont label you one.
everlandH8ter 10 months ago
requiem for a dream remix
RoperFrenzy 2 years ago
@RoperFrenzy The un-remixed version, which i think is better, is called Requiem For a Dream By Clint Mansell, you can go into Audacity and edit it to fit a video for yourself too, so you don't have to have a remix.
belkeSMASH 1 year ago
A short but good compilation of nuclear explosions. Roperfrenzy, please tell me the name of that piece of music. I really dig it man...very appropriate.
konacustom77 3 years ago
"requiem for dream remix" yes it is a very good piece of music i heard it in another video and it left an impression on me for a couple weeks, so i had to put it in one of mine, thanks for the comment to :D
RoperFrenzy 3 years ago
so whats the difference between neuclear and atomic
bryanxfruit 3 years ago
A nuclear bomb and an atomic bomb are virtually synonymous. The two terms are both used to refer to a nuclear weapon, atomic is just another name but it means nuclear it is called an atom bomb because it involves the splitting or fusing of atoms but fission and fusion are all classified as nuclear.
RoperFrenzy 3 years ago