Manstein is easily the most brilliant tactician to emerge from the Wehrmacht's ranks during the 30s and 40s. If only he was given more freedom to fully exercise his genius we may have seen a very different outcome in this theatre. Erich von Manstein, I salute you!
@macarthurclough A friend of mine knows a real expert on the Eastern Front, and he said yeah, Manstein was the genius commander. But, he said Hitler lost the war the day he started it- that when you look at the operational records of their offensives, the Germans just didn't have the logistical reach; he said it would've taken every truck in the German Army to reach Moscow. He also said the Western allies made almost no difference militarily, and Stalin had 1,000 reserve divisions at war's end.
@loewie3007 It seems preposterous I know, and I wouldn't repeat it except for the high level of the source- there aren't a dozen like him in this country. But I don't want to argue, or sound like a know-it-all... just putting it out there.
i looked it further up and your right in a way that russia had manny reserves but most of them where not combat fitted soldiers older men young boys like the germans had at the end of the war
Why did the Germans invade the Crimea? Just place some troops across the Perekop isthmus and let the Soviets sit in the Crimea. In the Pacific War, the U.S. ignored many islands that the Japanese held. In Europe, the Allies let the Germans stay in Norway and in the submarine bases of France.
The 50 crack Soviet troops against the Germans in their counter-offensive caused the Germans much losses, the Germans was never able to conduct another 1500 mile front. Looking at a map of the Soviet Union 1942, the Crimea is a great risk for the Germans should the Soviets attacks from the north which eventually happened.
Americans should read why Japan was neutral with the Soviets. In 1938-1939, Japan threw a few of their best divisions against the Soviets, but the Soviets beat up the Japanese both times. Had these battles been a stalemate, perhaps Japan would've invaded Siberia when the Germans invaded the Soviets. Because the Japanese signed a neutral act, the Soviets was free to send west 50 excellent crack divisions against the Germans in Dec. 1941.
Why do I say this?! I was stationed in Wildflecken, Germany or the ONE-INCH LINE in the 60's. I had to study how the Soviets fought in case the Soviets invaded thru the Fulda Gap. We had to live as long as possible and hope for reinforcements from the west. I am glad the cold war ended. I am forever grateful for the Soviet sacrifice
Without the sacrifice of the Soviets, the western allies could not invade France- yes, it appears impressive with all the ships and equipment on the English channel, but, it would've been more impressive if 100 German divisions were waiting for them. The Americans would not sacrifice 5-10million soldiers with no guarantee of victory in a 'foreign' continent, which is Europe!!!!!.
A better book is "The Janus Head, A Portrait of Manstein" Marcel Stein. Manstein was a great General/Marshall, but a complete liar re his own failures in battle and the Holocaust. In particular, blaming Hitler for many failures (like Kursk) even though he supported them up until failure, when he started to complain about the date it was launched etc. Concerning the Holocaust, he tried to blame the SS although as FM you are responsible for everything in your sector. He could/should have resigned.
@ProgressiveThinker90 Stalin was pure evil but I salute the Rank & File of the Red Army for what their courage in WW2 along with those of The Western Allies
@maximatort Shut up you commie retard. Even today Manstien is revered as a brilliant tactician and masterful leader. You're idiotic banter reflects poorly on you.
@alpha001ful Was it really a great book? Please let me know. I am currently readin Panzer leader by Hienz Guderian. Alight book, I would have liked a more in depth look as to his feelings. More like troop movements. He does talk about his conferences with Hitler which i fully enjoy.
It's called "lost victories" . I got it from the library
alpha001ful 3 weeks ago
Battle of the Titans
Wittmann73 1 month ago
Manstien was a military beast, for sure...but wtf Japan!?!??!! guys should have helped out
sheemsheem 4 months ago
Manstein is easily the most brilliant tactician to emerge from the Wehrmacht's ranks during the 30s and 40s. If only he was given more freedom to fully exercise his genius we may have seen a very different outcome in this theatre. Erich von Manstein, I salute you!
macarthurclough 5 months ago
@macarthurclough A friend of mine knows a real expert on the Eastern Front, and he said yeah, Manstein was the genius commander. But, he said Hitler lost the war the day he started it- that when you look at the operational records of their offensives, the Germans just didn't have the logistical reach; he said it would've taken every truck in the German Army to reach Moscow. He also said the Western allies made almost no difference militarily, and Stalin had 1,000 reserve divisions at war's end.
mookins45 3 months ago
@mookins45
i doubt russia had an other 10 million men in reserve in the army TBH
loewie3007 2 months ago
@loewie3007 It seems preposterous I know, and I wouldn't repeat it except for the high level of the source- there aren't a dozen like him in this country. But I don't want to argue, or sound like a know-it-all... just putting it out there.
mookins45 2 months ago
@mookins45
i looked it further up and your right in a way that russia had manny reserves but most of them where not combat fitted soldiers older men young boys like the germans had at the end of the war
loewie3007 1 month ago
@loewie3007 Ah, now that makes perfect sense. Thanks for looking it up, and telling me!
mookins45 1 month ago
Why did the Germans invade the Crimea? Just place some troops across the Perekop isthmus and let the Soviets sit in the Crimea. In the Pacific War, the U.S. ignored many islands that the Japanese held. In Europe, the Allies let the Germans stay in Norway and in the submarine bases of France.
KevinByrne2 7 months ago
@KevinByrne2
Cause it was at the black sea if the russians held the defence farther north they could launch a big offensive behind the german frontline
loewie3007 1 month ago
The 50 crack Soviet troops against the Germans in their counter-offensive caused the Germans much losses, the Germans was never able to conduct another 1500 mile front. Looking at a map of the Soviet Union 1942, the Crimea is a great risk for the Germans should the Soviets attacks from the north which eventually happened.
tartan64tan 7 months ago
Americans should read why Japan was neutral with the Soviets. In 1938-1939, Japan threw a few of their best divisions against the Soviets, but the Soviets beat up the Japanese both times. Had these battles been a stalemate, perhaps Japan would've invaded Siberia when the Germans invaded the Soviets. Because the Japanese signed a neutral act, the Soviets was free to send west 50 excellent crack divisions against the Germans in Dec. 1941.
tartan64tan 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Why do I say this?! I was stationed in Wildflecken, Germany or the ONE-INCH LINE in the 60's. I had to study how the Soviets fought in case the Soviets invaded thru the Fulda Gap. We had to live as long as possible and hope for reinforcements from the west. I am glad the cold war ended. I am forever grateful for the Soviet sacrifice
tartan64tan 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Without the sacrifice of the Soviets, the western allies could not invade France- yes, it appears impressive with all the ships and equipment on the English channel, but, it would've been more impressive if 100 German divisions were waiting for them. The Americans would not sacrifice 5-10million soldiers with no guarantee of victory in a 'foreign' continent, which is Europe!!!!!.
tartan64tan 7 months ago
Thanks for the upload HoustonGD :) Its a pity that Part 1/10 has been blocked
rahathossain81 8 months ago
Dude part 1 has been deleted !
alpha001ful 8 months ago
A better book is "The Janus Head, A Portrait of Manstein" Marcel Stein. Manstein was a great General/Marshall, but a complete liar re his own failures in battle and the Holocaust. In particular, blaming Hitler for many failures (like Kursk) even though he supported them up until failure, when he started to complain about the date it was launched etc. Concerning the Holocaust, he tried to blame the SS although as FM you are responsible for everything in your sector. He could/should have resigned.
MrRichardJHill 8 months ago
Where the hell is part 1 ?
alpha001ful 8 months ago
Anybody knows what's the name of the soundtrack in Battlefield series videos?
Tomenable 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CRIMEA IS russia
FREEDOM FOR CRIMEA
FREEDOM FOR ODESSA
unfukkkmee 11 months ago
Part 1 is blocked by NBC. Apparently they care more about money than educating people.
SnakeTheFox 1 year ago 2
@ProgressiveThinker90 Stalin was pure evil but I salute the Rank & File of the Red Army for what their courage in WW2 along with those of The Western Allies
xyz49271 1 year ago 3
Yes I am currently reading the field marshals book. Lost Victories. God rest Field Marshal Eric Von Manstien.
bearing44 2 years ago 10
@bearing44
Burn in hell Field Marshal Eric Von Manstien.
maximatort 1 year ago
@maximatort Shut up you commie retard. Even today Manstien is revered as a brilliant tactician and masterful leader. You're idiotic banter reflects poorly on you.
MrHappyTruth 1 year ago
@bearing44 DUde after watching this documentary, i can't help reading that book. Awesome stuff. Best autobiography i have ever read
alpha001ful 6 months ago
@alpha001ful Was it really a great book? Please let me know. I am currently readin Panzer leader by Hienz Guderian. Alight book, I would have liked a more in depth look as to his feelings. More like troop movements. He does talk about his conferences with Hitler which i fully enjoy.
popper504 3 weeks ago
music is TOO LOUD !!!
christopherlehnert 2 years ago
thanks for uploading!!!
cyb0rg2 3 years ago 15