And also....horned people, we think evil...Satan, etc. Than what of god? What are the prophets of god who speak of Satan and the demons and what not? If those are our creators... What would god be? A separate energy or transdimensional being or group of beings who would be contrary to the horned ones who don't give a damn about us? Who would him/it/they be? Just a thought.
@devinleduc well i think of it this way, they are a race with so much wisdom and spirit and have powers that we can only imagine, as we humans evolve we begin thinking somethings we do is wrong, back then rape was a common thing, then we had racism, but we grew, and that's how we evolve, but we are stuck in this idea of physical beauty, we are falling to care more for the physical body sex wise than our spiritual body, good against evil just like politics
Well maybe Bigfoot has the same amount of chromosomes as us...and maybe THEY were the slaves, because they are way bigger and more powerful. Maybe we were their handlers, or children of theirs created for a different purpose.
I ask one question. Why when I go outside do I need to wear sunglasses, but my dog that im taking for a walk does not? Why would we evolve worse eyes over time? Why doesn't an ape have to wear sunglasses? Why if I go skiing do I need to wear eye protection or I go snowblind? Evolution is supposed to improve species, not hinder them. Our eyes did NOT evolve naturally on this planet, they were given to us.
@tstein05 Yeah. And there are some issues about races that don't seem to add up.For example, Asians have very narrow eyes. Is Asia a sunny place or something? Africans have dark skin as protection, why don't they have narrow eyes to cope with all that sun?
@iMpRiSoNeD44 The Bible says that God created man in his own image. (Genesis 1:27). Jesus created man (John 1:2) If you truely love Jesus you will agree with his Word which tells you that you were created in God's image. So if you truely believe in Jesus, will you deny the Truth and listen to man whom Jesus created? Satan doesnt want you to believe God created the world. The Bible says Satan is in currentrly in charge of the world. You must get salvation not to be condemned with him.
@RobertsDigital You use the word believe a lot. Believe basically means you want something to be true. There is a difference between believe and knowing. If I get condemned with Satan for not believing, SO BE IT!
@SebastianNovakZarate But without FAITH it is impossible to please him (God): for he that cometh to God must BELIEVE that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him. (Hebrews 11:6)
@Triplexity Probably by a process we don't even know of. By the way, why do you post things that promote this topic when you're not in agreement with it?
On page 128 of "The lost book of Enki" Enki says "The being we need already exist in the Abzu" (South Africa). The genetic splicing that produced human beings took place in Enki's "House of Life", located in the Abzu, on a lake - near gushing waters.
Human brains can learn a great deal depending on how much we are taught and on the individuals intellect. Theres great variation in humans. Some are soft, some aggressive. Some weak, some strong. Some dumb, some smart.
But animals are different. A tiger will always be a tiger. They all have the same strength, same behaviour. A bear will always be a bear. Same strength, same behaviour. etc
But we humans have so much variation. Now thats strange....
@womblewandering What is false. Ever hear of the Alpha male/female? Runt of the litter? There is variation in everything. Consider this as a result, our enviroment's may have something to do with the variation you point out in humanity? One other thing seem's strange to me. There's gold in many other place's, right? These whatever you want to call them were advanced? But not advanced enough to come up with a better way to mine gold? There are more question's to ask!
@womblewandering That is simply NOT true. Animals can act differently amongst themselves. Just look at your average pet dog. Some dogs are aggressive, some are hyper...etc. You may think Tigers all act the same, but how many Tigers do you see together to make that comparison?
@arulius74 Dogs can behave differently yes but thats only minor behaviours ie: hyper, aggressive, passive.
But no matter how much you teach it to speak a language, it simply would not know how to. No matter how much you teahc it to go on a laptop, it will not know how. No matter how much you teach it to use a camera, it will not know. But for humans, if you teach them, they will know.
Tigers? Find me proof of a tiger writing a musical masterpiece and i will welcome it.
@womblewandering What you are implying is called "consciousness", which there are only 2 mammals on the planet, other than humans, that has this "consciousness"...those are Chimps, and Dolphins. You can teach a chimp to speak, but its by sign language. If they COULD speak, they would try to mock the sounds we make.
i always belived that we humans came from som where else even as a child. the little proof as like just the nature our young time here and that we where so different then everything else made me belive that and now i see that i thought right finaly
very good video. mainstream scientists are silenced with this discussion. this discussion is more convincing than just piling up bones of monkeys and gorrillas forcing the issue to connect that man came from these beast.
@rabisrabis 'Mainstream' scientists (if you want to think in black and white) are not silenced, they are ignoring it because it isn't worth responding to. There are countless inaccuracies in this video presentation, he succeeds only in convincing those predisposed to think conspiratorialy and those who are ill-informed on the subjects of genetics and physical anthropology enough to be persuaded by his admittedly strong rhetorical skills.
@TSM8088 Seriously. Also, when he begins to know the subject matter he is talking about I will take him seriously. He makes so many factual errors and uses such fallatious logic, it would be difficult to know where to begin debunking him. Probably not on YouTube comments, more on video.
@ianman6 you should make a video i would love to see your facts to back up your position i think you cant handle the facts presented. if you ever make a video to do such send me a link.
@theshortfuze I'm not gonna lie, I'm too busy and too lazy to make a video. The reason is I am going to school persuing graduate degrees in anthropology and working full time. Also, I think that 'YouTube research'is a waste of time. Some of the errors he makes regard the use of morphological data and misrepresentation of the claims of homonid evolution. The research is already there for anyone to look at. But don't take it from me, I've been brainwashed by anthropology, right?
Just another guy with his own view trying to make a name for himself, and a Big Bank Account. Claiming we are a cross breed from another place. But who made them? Another rebadged view of twisted alien evolution. No such thing. God is King of Kings, he has no maker, no beginning & no end. All powerfull. We are like ants scurrying about.
@outbackjack1974 He never said God didnt create all, he is opposing the theory of evoluton. He also states that the Genesis account is a condensed version of a much older Sumerian writing. The question we should be asking is who did we call God in Genesis? Many believe that what happened then is much similar to what happened in the South Pacific after WWI with the " Cargo Cults". You would definitely have to have an open mind to other possibilities when considering this theory.
@Blountvideos [quote]The question we should be asking is who did we call God in Genesis? [/quote] The same God as he was in the new testament. He said he was the same yeaterday, today and forever. Same God differant time. But like you say it may be condensed, and we may not have all the information the people way way back then did at the time of Job, which they say is the oldest book in the old testament. The people that predated genisis and jobs time may have knew way more about our origin.
@Blountvideos The bible was a updated history from the beginning to the end of our time, in the bible god clarifies that he is the creator, and there is no other god besides him, like in our time, there has to be a leader, a boss, president, commander of a certain group, GOD was the commander/leader of the alien race,of that planet, the other gods that we worshiped might have been the ones under the leader, similar to the governors of states
@outbackjack1974 Now, let me ask you this. What proof do you have that god does exist? I'll be clear, god himself can't be disproved to exist, but he also can't be proved to exist. With that said, believing in the idea behind god is exactly like believing in the tooth fairy.
There are several science errors in these videos. Here are a few:
* Homo Sapiens is thought to have evolved from Homo Heidelbergensiss or Antecessor, not Neanderthals.
* Mitochondrial Eve is merely the most recent common ancestor of all humans, not the first human.
* Y chromosomes are basically degenerate X chromosomes, not some source of special alien DNA. Y chromosomes experience a higher root of mutation and tend to lose genes.
I am 90% convinced to his invention theory, but something that doesn't make sense to me apart from everything else. So aliens came across the vast galaxies, traveled trillions of light-years, chose our solar system and made the earth from collision from two rocks (this is exactly like what modern science suggest, coincidence?), gave in life. Now this makes sense to me that they might want to do experiments, as they must be curios folks like us. I get it.
No disrespect given in anyway I may add! The picture isnt crystal clear for modern homo sapiens, people want to know alot and its a long time ago so evidence and dating etc comes about quite slowly. A nice early human (mdoern homo sapiens) site is Blombos Cave in South Africa, one of the first peices we could call 'art' there. Comes in at around 80,000 BC and is a hutner gatherer group eating shellfish and bringing there kills etc back to the cave, making tools etc. Im gone now. All the best!
However the difference between these 'unbelievably distant relatives' and us sometimes is only the thickness of your eyebrow ridge and brain size. Things that are barely anything at all i nthe bigger scale of things. Pye isnt just missing the goal, he is knocking it clear off the sports field. The same evidence he manipulates for DNA actually disproves his theory outright. Since the DNA 'results' of human mother and unclear (normal this to happen) father for Starchild came out he's gone AWOL.
He has the skull of what most would consider an ancient human!! Huge brow ridges,sloping forehead. These are traits that ancient humans in the fossil record have had way back. Infact it is these traits that are the last to change until we term ourselves as 'modern humans'. There isnt any sort of cover up by scholars, we want to know the truth as much as you! I believe in ET's existence just not with this
What he says in this last section about us being brand 'spanking new' is true that we are a new species, but we dont appear from nowhere! He is tlaking as if he were a school child getting it wrong. We as a species emerge relativley new but your genetics go back incredibly far, we share 99% with common ancestors from 6 million years ago and you can see tha i nthe DNA. We have recently been shown to share Neanderthal DNA also. Please guys this fella msot the time is talking nonsense.
DNA evidence tells it all and even shows that everyone in the world, excluding current Africans (due to gene flow), decends from a relativley small group of Africans leaving the continent and overitme populating the world. This is solid fact, and the DNA is as earthly as the hominins we share so much with. My professor for years has argued we were able to breed with Neanderthals, and the sequencing of the genome recently shows they did, and our DNA today contains Neanderthal influence also.
Anatomically Homo sapiens slowly emerged, the transition is not always crystal clear but everyday it becomes clearer, dentition became smaller because of the cooking of foods, brains were large due to fatty nutriton such as bone marrow tools enabled them to get to.The tool industries they used slowly become more advanced over time. Hunter gatherer socieites is how they lived with no evidence for even villages or even more relevant to this discussion, mining for gold on a galactic industy level!
You can talk about species names all day as there are lots and opinions differ, but Homo heidelbergensis is regarded as the likely ancestor of Homo sapiens within Africa, and the ancestor of Homo sapien neanderthalensis in Europe. Heidelbergensis was still kitted out for a hard life body wise, but tools such a javilin spears (try searching up Schoeningen) just as an example from 500,000 years ago or so meant killing at range was possible, rather than going head to head with animals.
@negait They would tear this guy apart. You think through all our DNA studies anything as obvious and manipulation would go undiscovered? The Fossil record is a brilliant example and shows our developments as Hominin. Not only skeletal changes but behavioural changes coming with them. Your simply wrong, I would love your story to be true and would love to pursue it if there was some truth but there isnt anything at all logically to make you even think this happened?
Just have done a bit of research and looked at the African sites. They are a known set of sites belonging to a much more recent time. I cant be dealing with talking about all this as its just pop science and this guy is just crazy. I dont say this often but I'm sorry your wrong. If you guys wanted some credibility start writing journal and scientific papers, there is barely anything of substance writen on your 'subject'.
I mean I'm giving you guys a chance but Im' listening to completley madness. NO Archaeological evidence accounts for widespread mining of earth for anothe planets gold (wtf?). We have things as detailed as flint scatters from one tool made 500k ago, and you guys cant show us anything.Where are these aliens? We arent anything strange at all, just advanced primates. Its clear before our eyes, we slowly devloped anatomically and behaviourly and all evidence points to this. You'll all grow out of it
Evidence is interpreted through very limited senses and in conditioned minds. I think it's fair to say that not ALL evidence points to your conclusion.
Nice theory except it is not supported at all by the fossil records. We simply don't have the skeletal remains showing the steps in between us and hominoids. We don't have them because they don't exist.
@negait Homo ergaster over 2 million years ago had essentially the same post crania skeleton as us only more robust, we see that becoming more gracile for a very long time. The fascination around the emergence of Homo sapien sapiens, is because it is quite recent and people want to know ALL the answers when people cannot simply do that. Your being silly telling me to grow up, if you put any *experts* of this theory up against real experts (whether they believe out of africa/multi region etc PTO
I didn't say grow up, I said 'grow out of it' which just echoed your comment. You're right, we can't know ALL the answers. When archeologists find the missing remains we'll look back and say Pye was wrong. If homo ergaster had the qualities you are referring to then Pye would have mentioned that.
@negait Are you kidding? You think Pye would show a true representation of amazing fossils of archaic humans? From around 2 million years ago in the fossil record hominins such as Homo ergaster etc are very human anatomically, just primative and robust, slowly but surely from this point with the discoverey of fire, tools, meat, cooking and so on people relied on there growing brain more than there biceps and by 200,000 years ago you have hominins so gracile they are anatomically modern.
Ok. So just to be clear - you're saying that after doing all the research he did to formulate his theory and write his books he completely missed Homo Ergaster? You're saying that you did a little google search and found the one piece of evidence that destroys his entire theory. And now he travels around giving lectures and presenting a theory that is completely wrong? Come on dude. Stop listening to your professor.
@negait No I am not saying he missed one peice of crucial evidence, virtually every hominin known in the last few million years contributes to the transition to what we are now is what I am saying buddy. He argues that the difference between us (modern h.sapien) and older hominins is SO vast that the'yre is not a possibility we could be connected without manipulation. What I am saying is that is simply not true and any respected scholar whatever there beliefs knows that!
Ok. That's what I'm trying to confirm. You're saying that he is not scholarly in any way to have missed something so obvious. You're saying he's looked at the same evidence you have and either he simply interprets it differently, or he is deliberately ignoring it. In which case he is a flat out liar! Maybe he's just trying to sell books? Very bold of him to publicly present something he knows is wrong.
@negait I dont necessairly believe he knows he is flat out lying, he provides arguments that made me think 'thats interesting'. But on closer inspection its simply not true. He has interpreted data selectivley, ignoring things that dont quite fit and his audiences happen to be very critical of what we are 'told' to be true by the powers that be. I believe in alot of fringe theories, ET's existence, I am a searcher for 9/11 truth, I have an open mind. But this just is nothing more than fantasy.
@Triplexity LOLOL, you said his knowledge of the Sumerian language has never been proven. Good God that is an ignorant statement. He is recognized as a scholar of the language. Anyone in the field can tell you that. Their only beef is they don't always agree on the translation. However, Sitchin is the only one that flat out tells it like it is without bias. That's why we're actually getting to the truth.
Sitchen isnt the only one to translate the Sumerian tablets... he's just one of the first to take them seriously. The tablets are made of stone, they were meant to be rediscovered and learned from in my opinion. The NWO has nothing to benefit from Sitchen's work. They benefit more from mainstream science and religion.
Where are the mines?!?!? Where is any single grain of evidence to back up your crazy theory?? Not one fossil backs up your claims. Sure keep an open mind but this is a joke. You say monuments like stone henge etc are impossible to make? A few hundred men can make stonehenge in no time!!
@CastAirLead Oh brother, we have to reeducate you dummies over and over. The mines are in southern Africa, they are there now, you can go look at them in google earth. The star child is one hell of a fossil whistle blower that will rock t his world. If you think the pyramids are a piece of cake to make, then you obviously haven't bothered to read anything on the subject and aren't even worth talking to.
@c1zx Have you even seen H. Heidelbergensis in its last stages? It is so close to modern homo sapiens and still has half a million years yet to go! If these mines were being used for another planets protection (you couldnt write this shit) then they would need lots I'm sure. There isnt a single mining tool, a single 'mine' that is actually a mine and not a cave, not one peice of evidence to back this up.Star Child is a bizarre skull (its not a fossil), and needs investiagtion but this is crap.
@CastAirLead There are no humans, only homnids up to 250,000 years ago. Hominids are close to humans, but they are not humans. Hominids have been here forever and they are still here. Star child a bizarre skull you say? You obviously have not done any reading on the matter. It's way beyond 'bizarre'. It has been proven to have a human mother and a non human father. That means it's a hybrid. It's the find of the millennium. All of this goes right along with what the Samarians told us .
@c1zx DNA evidence ties us back to our African ancestors. No 'Alien' DNA in our blood my friend. Summarians is all jibba jabba. Just badly translated stuff. I am still to see the proper evidence for Star Child having 'alien blood' I would have to speak to someone who actually does genetics, not people who are hostile and dont know how to approach academia. Im sorry its just so far fetched with very little evidence to support it.
The Anunnaki could have evolved naturally to anyone asking that question. Not that I necessarily believe any of this although it is intriguing and at the very least entertaining.
@Triplexity exactly,God created the anunnaki,Lloyd does not discount true religion,just religions that have fear and control as goals.If you read the bible carefully you'll see that Jesus spoke about re-incarnation and the horoscopes.There is proof solid proof that he visited India in his early years and spent a substantial amount of time studying with the hindu and the buddists.Pye also doesn't believe evolution is totally wrong,just the macro-evolution,no transitional species.!
@Triplexity well i had a think about that, good question, i had a forght, if something can come from nothing then nothing can come from something, the Anunnaki could have come about in the same way as we were, suposedly geniticly manipulated by some race them selfs, maybe all life is a cascade affect, who knocked the domino over and how far does it go, where does it end ?, these are the questions the worlds brainest schollers have asked for an eternity and are still no closer to an anser.
This is massively interesting and profound, u see one can dismiss the sumarian tablets as a myth but this in tandom with the DNA manipulation and dateing methods add a considerable amount of weight to his theory about our evolution, it certainly ansers a lot of unansered questions, the sumarians also haveing knowledge about star systems they couldent have possible known about was obviously knowledge passed down to them by a space fareing race, these things can not been seen with the naked eye!
So who create Ancient Aryan in Hyperborea ( northern Siberia ). Aryans exist in exactly same time as Black men in Africa.This is archaeologically proofed fact.
@Triplexity wooow slow down buddy " my brain is going a mile a minute". let us digest this anunnaki stuff first then we'll worry about where they come from. all this thinking is making thirsty.
Do you have any more information regarding your statements about Mr. sitchins and his translations? Why would you infer he has connections to the NWO?
perhaps you should pay a bit more attention. he isnt saying that we were made from scratch. he clearly stated that ancestrial ape woman dna was spliced with that dna of annunaki. its is clearly described in the earth chronicles when the annunaki used their sperm and the egg of an eath descedant, and artificially implanted the fertilized embryo into a woman annunaki and she concieved the hybrid, homo sapien, sapien. the same thing that we're doing today as common practice.
sooo, for thousands of years evolution has brought us closer and closer to us, from chimpanzees which share 99% of thier DNA with us to homo sapiens etc, and then: BAM aliens come from outer space and make us from scratch but with suprisingly almost the same DNA as the monkeys before us? RIIIIIGGGGHHHHT...
Are you paying attention, Matt ? Guess not, you missed huge parts of his lecture.
Next effort, please consider that the UFO thenom is REAL... and thousands of Bigfoot sightings indicate HE is REAL. Give this series another listen. Mr. Pye makes a lot of sence to those of us whom know BigFoot is real and the UFO phenom is REAL..
No, "They made us in their likeness!" Meaning we look like them!
They came here and took homonoid DNA and used their Annunaki DNA to create humans!
How do we know this, the summarians, were the verry first civilization on this planet, right? You would think that the summarians came out of the stone age, right? WRONG!
This is where your investigation starts young grasshopper..........
well i have seen hard evidence to support my fact, and dont believe him when he says "oh well the difference in skulls is far to big" bla bla. There is hard evidence supporting my fact. Wheres yours? And the summarians didnt just "come out of the stone age" it took a long time for them to achieve what we know them for today.
How the fuk do u carve perfect giants deep into mountain sides out of the stoneage? How were the summarians able to have 300 character in their languade, and we still only have 42!
There are HUGE monuments and carvings around the world that even pre date humans!
If you have an open mind about things then i suggest you go and look for your self to see!
time, effort, time, effort. What else did they have to do?
i could make a 3000 character alphabet if i had enough imagination, the only reason we dont have more, is because we dont need more, duh.
yea yea dont belieive everything you hear, if you show me proof that they predated humans ill consider it, but the only proof you have is these naai's talking kuk.
oh and i have looked i just think its rubbish thats all
Base on what evidence did he came to the QUANTUM LEAP CONCLUSION that "Alien" genetically engineered human DNA from ape DNA. The Sumerian text is his proof subject to his interpretation???? Human could just be a different species altogether. In all intellectual honesty to put it nicely ,this is pure speculation.
So why does it say Ekni aka Satan? The original fallen angel was Alalu. And Enki's son Marduk aka RA is a much better canidate for Satan than Enki. Enki was the one who ,under the instruction of Galzu aka Jesus, warned Ziusudra aka Noah of the deluge aka great flood.
Exactly, I do not Believe that Enki is Satan. And Any way you look at it, it only references to the rivalries between the family of the Annunaki. It doesn't represent to The Devil as the Christians see the Devil anyway. They just don't understand because they are blinded by religion. Or their light. LOL...
Look at the white race facal features , eyes with blue color,blonde hair , etc, The face in mars looks like that of a white man. What about orientals , and blacks. Are some of us not from earth?
@doncalvito11 The face in mars is just a rugged mountain. White man only emerged in the last 20,000 thousand years during prolonged cold stages living in caves, the skin changed colour in order to absorb more vitamin D which was lacking due to the lack of exposure to sun. White man is just a very recent part to the story. There is plenty of real sources of information on this sort of thing out there, and my friend this is not one of them.
@CastAirLead oh , It's just a mountain , really where do you get your facts ? nasa . and there is plenty of information about this sort of thing jajaja that's a good one , where? It's that how they change the eye's color and hair also? and the nose became thin and large too . go back to sleep
Does anyonw kow that the intervention theory theorises regarding race? OK it says black africans were made first to mine gold, so were the other races tweaked to cope with mining in other areas. Or do they beleive we then just eveolved naturally without intervetion from the original black humans?
"An Evening with Lloyd Pye" is a bit lower in tone but just as informative.
Ok, the tranlastion of the tablets is up in the air, but is it fact that they invented the wheel, writing, calendars, and religion etc? If there are no precursor civilizations using those modalities, then it begs the question, where did it all come from? Where they just a culture of brillant minds? Or what...?
Is Sitchin's tranlation the only one? What is the alternative/competing translation?
Sorry but I need to get this off my chest. For those who look at something like this and truly think about it and see it for what it is, you are not some sataric Lucifer worshipper on a highway to hell. You are simply a curious human and I commend every single person like myself that can keep an open mind. This theory is not atheistic in nature and makes as much sense as anything else out there. An open mind is the most powerful thing one can have and with that I end my rant.
@peaceouthomee I agree that you should keep an open mind, even when approaching theories such as the ones presented in this video. I also agree that this has nothing to do with Satanism except that perhaps some satanic groups adhere to some of these theories. However, I don't agree that these theories make as much sense as 'anything else' out there. There are a literal plethora of factual and logical errors throughout this series which would require almost as long to expose.
In addition carbon dating is such an inaccurate way of creating a time line, his theory rests on this time line and on a method that once said a sample from a pencil was over 5000 years old when in reality it was made less than a week prior. Many facts rest upon testing methods that are still not perfected yet, our knowledge is young, we are a young species still. If I am some alien slave I will not lose sleep at night. Accept who we are and lets try to enlighten ourselves to the fullest.
Interesting theories especially on the holes in the evolutionary line. He has compelling arguements but my main question is why on Earth would an alien species create a dumbed down version of them to mine gold. If the aliens are so advanced and could manipulate genes, im sure they could have found a way to manufacture gold by some nuclear fusion instead.
I think it's more likely that whatever faction that has been explioting humans wants to frustrate efforts by another faction to open diplomatic relations with humans.
I've heard about the vatican (or whoever) plot to create an alien threat to unify the world (under their control presumably). I think it is more complicated than that though. If stichin was making that stuff up why would they not promote his ideas in the mass media? Why would the U.S. go into Iraq and confiscate or destroy artifacts (the Iraq national museum was looted in the war supposedly americans took tablets out of the basement)?
It's interesting but he never answers the question I had from the beginning...so what? What difference does it make what our origins are? I never have understood why the creationist get worked up; I never have understood why the scientist care what the creationist think, and, I don't know why you care either.
What difference would this actually make to your life? We have bigger problems than who or what created us. I just don't get it. But like I said, it is interesting.
If this is true and there are "Annunaki" on this planet who is passing our galaxy in just 3600 years, then...
... we are fucked! :D
Because i personally would like to kill a stupid asshole-species that is ENSLAVING themself and is finding 1000 of excused to do so.
Im really not proud to be an european, who has traveled in history overall in the world, killed the natives of amerika ( the real and redscinned people) and robbed africa of his ressources.
thats some brilliant knowledge, and its extremely hard to find fault with his arguments. im starting to think, they began our civilizations, and ater the great global cataclysm around 10000 years ago, the annunaki began dying out, and we began finding remnants of their cities and sacred sites and built on top of them, using myths and religion to help usunderstand the stories we had from before. hotep
ok so the first part of my comment didnt show up and i dont feel like typing out the entire story again. basically i watched this series of vids, it got me thinking, i thought about it while looking at the stars in the backyard and listening to my roommates play music, then i noticed two stars moving together in unison (sometimes not exact unison), across the sky in an arc, then back around in the original direction. !!??!? awesome.
The reason we use gold AND silver for money all around the world is that it looks good, it easily divisible, is rare and will last forever. Doesn't have anything to do with aliens. Also if alienscame here for gold in spaceships to protect their planet, why wouldn't they just use the Earth for their next home. Alot of holes and half truths in this guys theory.Although alot of gold at the Canadian Central Bank has gone missing. Perhaps aliens stole it!
We can out endurance run many animals on the open plain. This was a huge advantage to all previous humans that evolved in jungles. Why would aliens wanting slave labor in mines, engineer us to be able to run away? Seems counter productive. Also the discovery of seeds and agriculture did have a sudden effect on civilization, but look at the sudden effect of electricity and a few more things lately.
Something to consider. Our advantage was to be able to adapt to different climates and systems, something rare in the animal world. This required much abstract thinking and alot of brain. Our technological evolution surpassed our natural one, and we left the "Garden of Eden" and don't seem to belong. Our genes suggest we thinned out to almost extinction at one time then rebounded. That explains the large number of recessive mistakes. Inbreeding will do this.
Questions: Why did they engineer us 200K yrs ago but not use us until 6th century BC in Sumera? There are 30k year old human tablets with star scenes carved on them, but they wondered and hunted, not an ordered work force.
Rapid leaps in evolution are the norm in the record for many species. Its a result of a strong pressure on the pop. He possibly explained himself why lack of interim Homo's. Some climates, like jungles, produce no fossils.
one question im confused on. not that i doubt it, im opened minded. but yeah, about the big foot in russia mating with men and giving birth to their children...how, when it would have 48 chromosones and the men would have 46
I have watched a russian documentary about this made in 70's I think. They had the same info this guy mentiones and the children they claimed were born but dead. There might have been one girl that lived but somewhat retarded. They didn't get much detail because the villagers were really backward and only a few of them actually recalled some oral stories about it.
Good. We need different views on how everything works. Very thorough facts. I'm going to keep an eye out for this guy, he knows what he's talking about.
all the proof is here folks, just one thing sticks out, it doesnt make sense to me that they would use humans to mine gold since they are so technologicaly advanced they would have machines and robots to do that and would probably use the humans to build their cities but since humans arent really all that strong it makes more sense that they would use us as servants, butlers etc.
If they had all this knowledge about genetic engineering, why wouldn't they use some form of technology that would eliminate the need for slaves, slaves are a primitive way of getting things done.
primitive yes, effective definately, we humans still use slaves today, machines that do our jobs for us without any compensation, our capitalistic society is a form of slavery by introducing debt. slavery works!!! lol
The whole story of the Anunnaki and how they were here for gold and made us mine for gold... it fits so perfectly for man's affinity for gold... Why? You can't eat it or drink it. There are much more rarely (and thus more valueable) metals.. why is Gold so important to us? it was made such...why have almost every ancient culture viewed gold as "the metal of the gods"? simply because that's exactly what it was... and I'll tell you why... One of the questions with the far flung Nibiru theory...
that i get asked all the time is... how can Nibiru survive being so far out? it would be too cold... True... under most circumstances... but this is where the gold comes in... you see, any advanced culture, once they have the sophistication to do so, would create what is known as a Dyson's Sphere... For those that don't know what it is, it's an artificial field or blanket wrapped around the planet to trap it's heat and energy... mainly the planet's natural geo-thermal energy to heat the planet..
doing such would protect the planet from freezing when it's flung out so far away... any advanced civilization would create a dyson's sphere simply because it makes sense to do so (unless that planet has greedy energy tycoons like our planet, then you'd have some problems getting free energy). Well, this is what would be the case with Nibiru... simply for the survival of their planet... and according to theory, one of the main metals one would need for a dyson's sphere... is gold...
And then we have the case for the "winged globe" effect that we hear and read about with Nibiru... we have here the gold again... the sun's reflection off the dyson's sphere, with it's gold particles, would cause that glowing, winged globe effect... there is some science to this whole Nibiru mystery... I, of course, am only touching the tip of the iceberg, but i don't have enough room to explain it here on Youtube comments section., LOL
Wow, I watched the whole thing, apparently you guys aren't paying attention. He is using what we call "circular arguments". Assume something to be true then use it to prove itself. It's the same thing the orthodox jews use to prove their Torah(first five books of the bible). Many of his statements are just not true regarding science and scientists. You guys should really research things before commenting.
I kind of agree with the slave idea, because that would explain how there are a lot of people living as peons just content living paycheck to paycheck. And how religion and "genetics" are hand in hand maintaining the slave.
Very interesting. this guy could be a Galileo of our time, not getting the recognition in his lifetime, or a quack like Nostradomus. Who knows, just keep an open mind I think that's the most important lesson we should learn from school, but most miss...
I do agree with the slave race idea also.. but I also think about the exploding of a planet that makes up our astroid belt adding the question>What caused the exsplosion? and why?
i don`t believe it`s a natural event!
Two thing have to be addressed RH negitive blood Non monkey blood and the astroid belt exsplosion.. No one waking up is going to be happy until these two thing are taken into acount and exsplained with out having a cover stories to hide something behind these events.
he proves himself wrong in so many different ways...
mountainhollerable 1 month ago
So Who Created the Annunnauki?
pitty4cly 2 months ago
@pitty4cly lol well you gotta go ask them yourself, the answer you're looking for is not in this realm
BeatsOutDBricks 2 weeks ago
@pitty4cly we dont know? they're from another planet? they created us?
yahmanization 1 week ago
dat whore that laughed when he said "DNA deepthroat"
RushHourTraffic 3 months ago
And also....horned people, we think evil...Satan, etc. Than what of god? What are the prophets of god who speak of Satan and the demons and what not? If those are our creators... What would god be? A separate energy or transdimensional being or group of beings who would be contrary to the horned ones who don't give a damn about us? Who would him/it/they be? Just a thought.
devinleduc 4 months ago
@devinleduc well i think of it this way, they are a race with so much wisdom and spirit and have powers that we can only imagine, as we humans evolve we begin thinking somethings we do is wrong, back then rape was a common thing, then we had racism, but we grew, and that's how we evolve, but we are stuck in this idea of physical beauty, we are falling to care more for the physical body sex wise than our spiritual body, good against evil just like politics
BeatsOutDBricks 2 weeks ago
@scote1963
Well maybe Bigfoot has the same amount of chromosomes as us...and maybe THEY were the slaves, because they are way bigger and more powerful. Maybe we were their handlers, or children of theirs created for a different purpose.
devinleduc 4 months ago
I ask one question. Why when I go outside do I need to wear sunglasses, but my dog that im taking for a walk does not? Why would we evolve worse eyes over time? Why doesn't an ape have to wear sunglasses? Why if I go skiing do I need to wear eye protection or I go snowblind? Evolution is supposed to improve species, not hinder them. Our eyes did NOT evolve naturally on this planet, they were given to us.
tstein05 5 months ago
@tstein05 Yeah. And there are some issues about races that don't seem to add up.For example, Asians have very narrow eyes. Is Asia a sunny place or something? Africans have dark skin as protection, why don't they have narrow eyes to cope with all that sun?
SebastianNovakZarate 5 months ago
wait is he saying the more chromosomes the better, a butterfly has about 380 chromosomes, i don't see them creating wormholes and splitting atoms
bigbdude1234 6 months ago
@bigbdude1234 haha, sarcasm at its best
nowzadick 5 months ago
i believe in jesus and wat has been told in this videos
iMpRiSoNeD44 7 months ago
@iMpRiSoNeD44 The Bible says that God created man in his own image. (Genesis 1:27). Jesus created man (John 1:2) If you truely love Jesus you will agree with his Word which tells you that you were created in God's image. So if you truely believe in Jesus, will you deny the Truth and listen to man whom Jesus created? Satan doesnt want you to believe God created the world. The Bible says Satan is in currentrly in charge of the world. You must get salvation not to be condemned with him.
RobertsDigital 5 months ago
@RobertsDigital You use the word believe a lot. Believe basically means you want something to be true. There is a difference between believe and knowing. If I get condemned with Satan for not believing, SO BE IT!
SebastianNovakZarate 5 months ago
@SebastianNovakZarate But without FAITH it is impossible to please him (God): for he that cometh to God must BELIEVE that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him. (Hebrews 11:6)
RobertsDigital 4 months ago
@Triplexity Probably by a process we don't even know of. By the way, why do you post things that promote this topic when you're not in agreement with it?
treasuredroperX 10 months ago
This guy uses some bad terminology. Mongoloids and Negroids?
Antisyzygy 10 months ago
@Antisyzygy Would it be bad if he said Caucoid?
chrometanned 10 months ago
On page 128 of "The lost book of Enki" Enki says "The being we need already exist in the Abzu" (South Africa). The genetic splicing that produced human beings took place in Enki's "House of Life", located in the Abzu, on a lake - near gushing waters.
almac521 10 months ago
If the Anunnaki Had to fuse 2 chromozones to mate with prehumans then how are Russian men breeding with bigfoot... Little in consistecy there.
SCote1963 10 months ago
@SCote1963 females are primate n we breed with them
iMpRiSoNeD44 7 months ago
The interesting thing is this....
Human brains can learn a great deal depending on how much we are taught and on the individuals intellect. Theres great variation in humans. Some are soft, some aggressive. Some weak, some strong. Some dumb, some smart.
But animals are different. A tiger will always be a tiger. They all have the same strength, same behaviour. A bear will always be a bear. Same strength, same behaviour. etc
But we humans have so much variation. Now thats strange....
womblewandering 10 months ago 9
@womblewandering What is false. Ever hear of the Alpha male/female? Runt of the litter? There is variation in everything. Consider this as a result, our enviroment's may have something to do with the variation you point out in humanity? One other thing seem's strange to me. There's gold in many other place's, right? These whatever you want to call them were advanced? But not advanced enough to come up with a better way to mine gold? There are more question's to ask!
333x2x1 6 months ago
@womblewandering That is simply NOT true. Animals can act differently amongst themselves. Just look at your average pet dog. Some dogs are aggressive, some are hyper...etc. You may think Tigers all act the same, but how many Tigers do you see together to make that comparison?
arulius74 5 months ago
@arulius74 Dogs can behave differently yes but thats only minor behaviours ie: hyper, aggressive, passive.
But no matter how much you teach it to speak a language, it simply would not know how to. No matter how much you teahc it to go on a laptop, it will not know how. No matter how much you teach it to use a camera, it will not know. But for humans, if you teach them, they will know.
Tigers? Find me proof of a tiger writing a musical masterpiece and i will welcome it.
womblewandering 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@womblewandering What you are implying is called "consciousness", which there are only 2 mammals on the planet, other than humans, that has this "consciousness"...those are Chimps, and Dolphins. You can teach a chimp to speak, but its by sign language. If they COULD speak, they would try to mock the sounds we make.
arulius74 5 months ago
i always belived that we humans came from som where else even as a child. the little proof as like just the nature our young time here and that we where so different then everything else made me belive that and now i see that i thought right finaly
amarath84 10 months ago
Interesting, the indigenous people of South Africa are the Khoisan. The Zulu and Xhosa didn't migrate there till 500Ad.
MrOneDr 11 months ago
This just makes so much sense!!
paulrodden 11 months ago
very good video. mainstream scientists are silenced with this discussion. this discussion is more convincing than just piling up bones of monkeys and gorrillas forcing the issue to connect that man came from these beast.
rabisrabis 1 year ago
@rabisrabis 'Mainstream' scientists (if you want to think in black and white) are not silenced, they are ignoring it because it isn't worth responding to. There are countless inaccuracies in this video presentation, he succeeds only in convincing those predisposed to think conspiratorialy and those who are ill-informed on the subjects of genetics and physical anthropology enough to be persuaded by his admittedly strong rhetorical skills.
ianman6 11 months ago
When this guy learns to pronounce "orangutang" properly then I'll have an open mind to his fairy tale...
TSM8088 1 year ago
@TSM8088 Seriously. Also, when he begins to know the subject matter he is talking about I will take him seriously. He makes so many factual errors and uses such fallatious logic, it would be difficult to know where to begin debunking him. Probably not on YouTube comments, more on video.
ianman6 11 months ago
@ianman6 you should make a video i would love to see your facts to back up your position i think you cant handle the facts presented. if you ever make a video to do such send me a link.
theshortfuze 9 months ago
@theshortfuze I'm not gonna lie, I'm too busy and too lazy to make a video. The reason is I am going to school persuing graduate degrees in anthropology and working full time. Also, I think that 'YouTube research'is a waste of time. Some of the errors he makes regard the use of morphological data and misrepresentation of the claims of homonid evolution. The research is already there for anyone to look at. But don't take it from me, I've been brainwashed by anthropology, right?
ianman6 9 months ago
@theshortfuze Also, I've never made a video and in all likelyhood I wood suck at it. But if I ever do I'll surely send you a link.
ianman6 9 months ago
look up STEWART SWERDLOW
icyhot321 1 year ago
sitchin is a lying sack of excrament. freemason
bluefly28 1 year ago
Just another guy with his own view trying to make a name for himself, and a Big Bank Account. Claiming we are a cross breed from another place. But who made them? Another rebadged view of twisted alien evolution. No such thing. God is King of Kings, he has no maker, no beginning & no end. All powerfull. We are like ants scurrying about.
outbackjack1974 1 year ago
@outbackjack1974 He never said God didnt create all, he is opposing the theory of evoluton. He also states that the Genesis account is a condensed version of a much older Sumerian writing. The question we should be asking is who did we call God in Genesis? Many believe that what happened then is much similar to what happened in the South Pacific after WWI with the " Cargo Cults". You would definitely have to have an open mind to other possibilities when considering this theory.
Blountvideos 1 year ago 3
@Blountvideos [quote]The question we should be asking is who did we call God in Genesis? [/quote] The same God as he was in the new testament. He said he was the same yeaterday, today and forever. Same God differant time. But like you say it may be condensed, and we may not have all the information the people way way back then did at the time of Job, which they say is the oldest book in the old testament. The people that predated genisis and jobs time may have knew way more about our origin.
outbackjack1974 1 year ago
@Blountvideos The bible was a updated history from the beginning to the end of our time, in the bible god clarifies that he is the creator, and there is no other god besides him, like in our time, there has to be a leader, a boss, president, commander of a certain group, GOD was the commander/leader of the alien race,of that planet, the other gods that we worshiped might have been the ones under the leader, similar to the governors of states
BeatsOutDBricks 2 weeks ago
@outbackjack1974 Now, let me ask you this. What proof do you have that god does exist? I'll be clear, god himself can't be disproved to exist, but he also can't be proved to exist. With that said, believing in the idea behind god is exactly like believing in the tooth fairy.
AllThatRemainsFan100 3 weeks ago
what really makes me wonder assuming this is true some of it maybe. What happened to the "creators" so to speak
anthonyww713 1 year ago
There are several science errors in these videos. Here are a few:
* Homo Sapiens is thought to have evolved from Homo Heidelbergensiss or Antecessor, not Neanderthals.
* Mitochondrial Eve is merely the most recent common ancestor of all humans, not the first human.
* Y chromosomes are basically degenerate X chromosomes, not some source of special alien DNA. Y chromosomes experience a higher root of mutation and tend to lose genes.
All of this is on Wikipedia.
cowgodgames 1 year ago
@cowgodgames Higher "rate" of mutation.
Gah! I can't type today.
cowgodgames 1 year ago
But why would they come and mine gold on earth when can do that in a lab with their level of technology. Might want to look into that.
peth155 1 year ago
I am 90% convinced to his invention theory, but something that doesn't make sense to me apart from everything else. So aliens came across the vast galaxies, traveled trillions of light-years, chose our solar system and made the earth from collision from two rocks (this is exactly like what modern science suggest, coincidence?), gave in life. Now this makes sense to me that they might want to do experiments, as they must be curios folks like us. I get it.
peth155 1 year ago
No disrespect given in anyway I may add! The picture isnt crystal clear for modern homo sapiens, people want to know alot and its a long time ago so evidence and dating etc comes about quite slowly. A nice early human (mdoern homo sapiens) site is Blombos Cave in South Africa, one of the first peices we could call 'art' there. Comes in at around 80,000 BC and is a hutner gatherer group eating shellfish and bringing there kills etc back to the cave, making tools etc. Im gone now. All the best!
CastAirLead 1 year ago
However the difference between these 'unbelievably distant relatives' and us sometimes is only the thickness of your eyebrow ridge and brain size. Things that are barely anything at all i nthe bigger scale of things. Pye isnt just missing the goal, he is knocking it clear off the sports field. The same evidence he manipulates for DNA actually disproves his theory outright. Since the DNA 'results' of human mother and unclear (normal this to happen) father for Starchild came out he's gone AWOL.
CastAirLead 1 year ago
Type 'Russian Boxer neanderthal' into google.
He has the skull of what most would consider an ancient human!! Huge brow ridges,sloping forehead. These are traits that ancient humans in the fossil record have had way back. Infact it is these traits that are the last to change until we term ourselves as 'modern humans'. There isnt any sort of cover up by scholars, we want to know the truth as much as you! I believe in ET's existence just not with this
CastAirLead 1 year ago
What he says in this last section about us being brand 'spanking new' is true that we are a new species, but we dont appear from nowhere! He is tlaking as if he were a school child getting it wrong. We as a species emerge relativley new but your genetics go back incredibly far, we share 99% with common ancestors from 6 million years ago and you can see tha i nthe DNA. We have recently been shown to share Neanderthal DNA also. Please guys this fella msot the time is talking nonsense.
CastAirLead 1 year ago
DNA evidence tells it all and even shows that everyone in the world, excluding current Africans (due to gene flow), decends from a relativley small group of Africans leaving the continent and overitme populating the world. This is solid fact, and the DNA is as earthly as the hominins we share so much with. My professor for years has argued we were able to breed with Neanderthals, and the sequencing of the genome recently shows they did, and our DNA today contains Neanderthal influence also.
CastAirLead 1 year ago
Anatomically Homo sapiens slowly emerged, the transition is not always crystal clear but everyday it becomes clearer, dentition became smaller because of the cooking of foods, brains were large due to fatty nutriton such as bone marrow tools enabled them to get to.The tool industries they used slowly become more advanced over time. Hunter gatherer socieites is how they lived with no evidence for even villages or even more relevant to this discussion, mining for gold on a galactic industy level!
CastAirLead 1 year ago
You can talk about species names all day as there are lots and opinions differ, but Homo heidelbergensis is regarded as the likely ancestor of Homo sapiens within Africa, and the ancestor of Homo sapien neanderthalensis in Europe. Heidelbergensis was still kitted out for a hard life body wise, but tools such a javilin spears (try searching up Schoeningen) just as an example from 500,000 years ago or so meant killing at range was possible, rather than going head to head with animals.
CastAirLead 1 year ago
Wait, if you fuse two chromosomes together to make one, you would have 47. They must have done it twice?
negait 1 year ago
@negait They would tear this guy apart. You think through all our DNA studies anything as obvious and manipulation would go undiscovered? The Fossil record is a brilliant example and shows our developments as Hominin. Not only skeletal changes but behavioural changes coming with them. Your simply wrong, I would love your story to be true and would love to pursue it if there was some truth but there isnt anything at all logically to make you even think this happened?
CastAirLead 1 year ago
Just have done a bit of research and looked at the African sites. They are a known set of sites belonging to a much more recent time. I cant be dealing with talking about all this as its just pop science and this guy is just crazy. I dont say this often but I'm sorry your wrong. If you guys wanted some credibility start writing journal and scientific papers, there is barely anything of substance writen on your 'subject'.
CastAirLead 1 year ago
I mean I'm giving you guys a chance but Im' listening to completley madness. NO Archaeological evidence accounts for widespread mining of earth for anothe planets gold (wtf?). We have things as detailed as flint scatters from one tool made 500k ago, and you guys cant show us anything.Where are these aliens? We arent anything strange at all, just advanced primates. Its clear before our eyes, we slowly devloped anatomically and behaviourly and all evidence points to this. You'll all grow out of it
CastAirLead 1 year ago
@CastAirLead
Evidence is interpreted through very limited senses and in conditioned minds. I think it's fair to say that not ALL evidence points to your conclusion.
MusicalAdrian 1 year ago
@CastAirLead
Nice theory except it is not supported at all by the fossil records. We simply don't have the skeletal remains showing the steps in between us and hominoids. We don't have them because they don't exist.
Don't worry, you'll grow out of it.
negait 1 year ago
@negait Homo ergaster over 2 million years ago had essentially the same post crania skeleton as us only more robust, we see that becoming more gracile for a very long time. The fascination around the emergence of Homo sapien sapiens, is because it is quite recent and people want to know ALL the answers when people cannot simply do that. Your being silly telling me to grow up, if you put any *experts* of this theory up against real experts (whether they believe out of africa/multi region etc PTO
CastAirLead 1 year ago
@CastAirLead
I didn't say grow up, I said 'grow out of it' which just echoed your comment. You're right, we can't know ALL the answers. When archeologists find the missing remains we'll look back and say Pye was wrong. If homo ergaster had the qualities you are referring to then Pye would have mentioned that.
negait 1 year ago
@negait Are you kidding? You think Pye would show a true representation of amazing fossils of archaic humans? From around 2 million years ago in the fossil record hominins such as Homo ergaster etc are very human anatomically, just primative and robust, slowly but surely from this point with the discoverey of fire, tools, meat, cooking and so on people relied on there growing brain more than there biceps and by 200,000 years ago you have hominins so gracile they are anatomically modern.
CastAirLead 1 year ago
@CastAirLead
Ok. So just to be clear - you're saying that after doing all the research he did to formulate his theory and write his books he completely missed Homo Ergaster? You're saying that you did a little google search and found the one piece of evidence that destroys his entire theory. And now he travels around giving lectures and presenting a theory that is completely wrong? Come on dude. Stop listening to your professor.
negait 1 year ago
@negait No I am not saying he missed one peice of crucial evidence, virtually every hominin known in the last few million years contributes to the transition to what we are now is what I am saying buddy. He argues that the difference between us (modern h.sapien) and older hominins is SO vast that the'yre is not a possibility we could be connected without manipulation. What I am saying is that is simply not true and any respected scholar whatever there beliefs knows that!
CastAirLead 1 year ago
@CastAirLead
Ok. That's what I'm trying to confirm. You're saying that he is not scholarly in any way to have missed something so obvious. You're saying he's looked at the same evidence you have and either he simply interprets it differently, or he is deliberately ignoring it. In which case he is a flat out liar! Maybe he's just trying to sell books? Very bold of him to publicly present something he knows is wrong.
negait 1 year ago
@negait I dont necessairly believe he knows he is flat out lying, he provides arguments that made me think 'thats interesting'. But on closer inspection its simply not true. He has interpreted data selectivley, ignoring things that dont quite fit and his audiences happen to be very critical of what we are 'told' to be true by the powers that be. I believe in alot of fringe theories, ET's existence, I am a searcher for 9/11 truth, I have an open mind. But this just is nothing more than fantasy.
CastAirLead 1 year ago
@Triplexity LOLOL, you said his knowledge of the Sumerian language has never been proven. Good God that is an ignorant statement. He is recognized as a scholar of the language. Anyone in the field can tell you that. Their only beef is they don't always agree on the translation. However, Sitchin is the only one that flat out tells it like it is without bias. That's why we're actually getting to the truth.
c1zx 1 year ago
@Triplexity
Sitchen isnt the only one to translate the Sumerian tablets... he's just one of the first to take them seriously. The tablets are made of stone, they were meant to be rediscovered and learned from in my opinion. The NWO has nothing to benefit from Sitchen's work. They benefit more from mainstream science and religion.
MikeGleeson1 1 year ago
Dont forget to get your broken gold together and put it in a envelope and mail it in.Its really platnum that is needed. Look up crop circles.Sigals
SUMORMORE 1 year ago
Where are the mines?!?!? Where is any single grain of evidence to back up your crazy theory?? Not one fossil backs up your claims. Sure keep an open mind but this is a joke. You say monuments like stone henge etc are impossible to make? A few hundred men can make stonehenge in no time!!
CastAirLead 1 year ago
@CastAirLead “Where are the mines?!?!?”
Southern Africa, do a google search. Type in 200000 year old mines!
wlfmi 1 year ago
@CastAirLead Oh brother, we have to reeducate you dummies over and over. The mines are in southern Africa, they are there now, you can go look at them in google earth. The star child is one hell of a fossil whistle blower that will rock t his world. If you think the pyramids are a piece of cake to make, then you obviously haven't bothered to read anything on the subject and aren't even worth talking to.
c1zx 1 year ago
@c1zx Have you even seen H. Heidelbergensis in its last stages? It is so close to modern homo sapiens and still has half a million years yet to go! If these mines were being used for another planets protection (you couldnt write this shit) then they would need lots I'm sure. There isnt a single mining tool, a single 'mine' that is actually a mine and not a cave, not one peice of evidence to back this up.Star Child is a bizarre skull (its not a fossil), and needs investiagtion but this is crap.
CastAirLead 1 year ago
@CastAirLead There are no humans, only homnids up to 250,000 years ago. Hominids are close to humans, but they are not humans. Hominids have been here forever and they are still here. Star child a bizarre skull you say? You obviously have not done any reading on the matter. It's way beyond 'bizarre'. It has been proven to have a human mother and a non human father. That means it's a hybrid. It's the find of the millennium. All of this goes right along with what the Samarians told us .
c1zx 1 year ago
@c1zx DNA evidence ties us back to our African ancestors. No 'Alien' DNA in our blood my friend. Summarians is all jibba jabba. Just badly translated stuff. I am still to see the proper evidence for Star Child having 'alien blood' I would have to speak to someone who actually does genetics, not people who are hostile and dont know how to approach academia. Im sorry its just so far fetched with very little evidence to support it.
CastAirLead 1 year ago
Mother Earth indeed.
Norm1011616 1 year ago
Comment removed
arvin1210 1 year ago
The Anunnaki could have evolved naturally to anyone asking that question. Not that I necessarily believe any of this although it is intriguing and at the very least entertaining.
Esoparagon 1 year ago
LOL @ OJ remark!
Amunet369 1 year ago
@Triplexity exactly,God created the anunnaki,Lloyd does not discount true religion,just religions that have fear and control as goals.If you read the bible carefully you'll see that Jesus spoke about re-incarnation and the horoscopes.There is proof solid proof that he visited India in his early years and spent a substantial amount of time studying with the hindu and the buddists.Pye also doesn't believe evolution is totally wrong,just the macro-evolution,no transitional species.!
Haplesshiccuper 1 year ago
@Triplexity what the fuck does this have to do with satan
beatle192837 1 year ago
@beatle192837 Christians have to throw Satan into the mix so that they feel comfortable. LMAO
c1zx 1 year ago
@Triplexity well i had a think about that, good question, i had a forght, if something can come from nothing then nothing can come from something, the Anunnaki could have come about in the same way as we were, suposedly geniticly manipulated by some race them selfs, maybe all life is a cascade affect, who knocked the domino over and how far does it go, where does it end ?, these are the questions the worlds brainest schollers have asked for an eternity and are still no closer to an anser.
leanmachene 1 year ago
This is massively interesting and profound, u see one can dismiss the sumarian tablets as a myth but this in tandom with the DNA manipulation and dateing methods add a considerable amount of weight to his theory about our evolution, it certainly ansers a lot of unansered questions, the sumarians also haveing knowledge about star systems they couldent have possible known about was obviously knowledge passed down to them by a space fareing race, these things can not been seen with the naked eye!
leanmachene 1 year ago
They would call them Nazis because on of you know who! Though their not.
mobilechief 1 year ago
The earth is may even be less than 10 thousand years!
FollowerOfGod3 1 year ago
So who create Ancient Aryan in Hyperborea ( northern Siberia ). Aryans exist in exactly same time as Black men in Africa.This is archaeologically proofed fact.
wlodzio47 1 year ago
@Triplexity wooow slow down buddy " my brain is going a mile a minute". let us digest this anunnaki stuff first then we'll worry about where they come from. all this thinking is making thirsty.
cool2t 1 year ago
@Triplexity why wouldnt satanism embrace this... It trumps God.
Kryptik316 1 year ago
this series is too damn short!!!
ghosterdude 1 year ago
Georgians and other Caucasians are direct descendants of Sumerians
GeoTaoKlarjetMoschoi 1 year ago
@Triplexity
Do you have any more information regarding your statements about Mr. sitchins and his translations? Why would you infer he has connections to the NWO?
Thanks
PDSalling 1 year ago
perhaps you should pay a bit more attention. he isnt saying that we were made from scratch. he clearly stated that ancestrial ape woman dna was spliced with that dna of annunaki. its is clearly described in the earth chronicles when the annunaki used their sperm and the egg of an eath descedant, and artificially implanted the fertilized embryo into a woman annunaki and she concieved the hybrid, homo sapien, sapien. the same thing that we're doing today as common practice.
quixcilver 1 year ago
What are mongoloids? Handycapped poeple?
Also there are NO shemales in nature, only humans get shemales! Why is that ?
Becuase the Annunaki have both male and female sex organs, and they are unisex!
Therefore, there has to be shemales out there that can possibly reproduce by them self!
Hillsillverr 1 year ago
somehow he talks about the islamic story about humain origins...
anafortbezzaf 1 year ago
sooo, for thousands of years evolution has brought us closer and closer to us, from chimpanzees which share 99% of thier DNA with us to homo sapiens etc, and then: BAM aliens come from outer space and make us from scratch but with suprisingly almost the same DNA as the monkeys before us? RIIIIIGGGGHHHHT...
lol this is bullshit!
Mattothee 1 year ago
@Mattothee
Are you paying attention, Matt ? Guess not, you missed huge parts of his lecture.
Next effort, please consider that the UFO thenom is REAL... and thousands of Bigfoot sightings indicate HE is REAL. Give this series another listen. Mr. Pye makes a lot of sence to those of us whom know BigFoot is real and the UFO phenom is REAL..
OK?
Ok!
PDSalling 1 year ago
No, "They made us in their likeness!" Meaning we look like them!
They came here and took homonoid DNA and used their Annunaki DNA to create humans!
How do we know this, the summarians, were the verry first civilization on this planet, right? You would think that the summarians came out of the stone age, right? WRONG!
This is where your investigation starts young grasshopper..........
The truth is out there!
Hillsillverr 1 year ago
well i have seen hard evidence to support my fact, and dont believe him when he says "oh well the difference in skulls is far to big" bla bla. There is hard evidence supporting my fact. Wheres yours? And the summarians didnt just "come out of the stone age" it took a long time for them to achieve what we know them for today.
Mattothee 1 year ago
Have you even listened to the video?
How the fuk do u carve perfect giants deep into mountain sides out of the stoneage? How were the summarians able to have 300 character in their languade, and we still only have 42!
There are HUGE monuments and carvings around the world that even pre date humans!
If you have an open mind about things then i suggest you go and look for your self to see!
Hillsillverr 1 year ago 5
@Hillsillverr
time, effort, time, effort. What else did they have to do?
i could make a 3000 character alphabet if i had enough imagination, the only reason we dont have more, is because we dont need more, duh.
yea yea dont belieive everything you hear, if you show me proof that they predated humans ill consider it, but the only proof you have is these naai's talking kuk.
oh and i have looked i just think its rubbish thats all
Mattothee 1 year ago
Base on what evidence did he came to the QUANTUM LEAP CONCLUSION that "Alien" genetically engineered human DNA from ape DNA. The Sumerian text is his proof subject to his interpretation???? Human could just be a different species altogether. In all intellectual honesty to put it nicely ,this is pure speculation.
danny3571 2 years ago
Comment removed
beejahbless 2 years ago
So why does it say Ekni aka Satan? The original fallen angel was Alalu. And Enki's son Marduk aka RA is a much better canidate for Satan than Enki. Enki was the one who ,under the instruction of Galzu aka Jesus, warned Ziusudra aka Noah of the deluge aka great flood.
guerrillap1mp 2 years ago
Exactly, I do not Believe that Enki is Satan. And Any way you look at it, it only references to the rivalries between the family of the Annunaki. It doesn't represent to The Devil as the Christians see the Devil anyway. They just don't understand because they are blinded by religion. Or their light. LOL...
enki35 2 years ago
DONT BELIEVE everything he says, he got the story a bit wrong. WE ARE NOT SLAVES, We havent been created from nothing, WE've existed ALLWAYS
bluenightwings 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Somehow I am not surprised that most people who actually take this crap seriously are also racists.
r2b2ct1 2 years ago
not as good as lord of the rings but i give a 3/5, he needs to add some elfs in his story and dwarfs wont hurt either.
alexdblade 2 years ago
HAHAHA FULLY AGREED
Mattothee 1 year ago
I have saved all of this information.. Very nice work Mr, Pye.
I wish I was there on that day.. But I'm there now.. Excellent work you have done.
5 stars..
Snowman374th 2 years ago
I am so proud of this Man and his constitutes.. They are truly amazing.
This work is very powerful. Mankind should focus on his every word.
Wolf / Gorilla.. I know you came to this if you have listen to me..
AS I SAID BEFORE.. FACT'S... TY.. FOR NOT RESPECTING MY RESEARCH and MAKING ME WORK HARD TO CONVINCE YOU & FIND THIS INFORMATION.
Court is adjourned. Peace out boyz.!
Snowman374th 2 years ago
Great work, respect to Lloyd Pye. Zacharia Sitchin's work has been covering this subject for many decades . . .
NassimHarameinVedas 2 years ago
Look at the white race facal features , eyes with blue color,blonde hair , etc, The face in mars looks like that of a white man. What about orientals , and blacks. Are some of us not from earth?
doncalvito11 2 years ago 4
According to Native Americans, different types of aliens took control of earth. There were wars in heaven. I guess we were like war booty.
Tawalisi 2 years ago
@doncalvito11 The face in mars is just a rugged mountain. White man only emerged in the last 20,000 thousand years during prolonged cold stages living in caves, the skin changed colour in order to absorb more vitamin D which was lacking due to the lack of exposure to sun. White man is just a very recent part to the story. There is plenty of real sources of information on this sort of thing out there, and my friend this is not one of them.
CastAirLead 1 year ago
@CastAirLead oh , It's just a mountain , really where do you get your facts ? nasa . and there is plenty of information about this sort of thing jajaja that's a good one , where? It's that how they change the eye's color and hair also? and the nose became thin and large too . go back to sleep
doncalvito11 1 year ago
@doncalvito11 Where do you get your facts then buddy? Yo ugot a telescope or something? Fucking jokes.
CastAirLead 1 year ago
Does anyonw kow that the intervention theory theorises regarding race? OK it says black africans were made first to mine gold, so were the other races tweaked to cope with mining in other areas. Or do they beleive we then just eveolved naturally without intervetion from the original black humans?
22poopoo 2 years ago
"An Evening with Lloyd Pye" is a bit lower in tone but just as informative.
Ok, the tranlastion of the tablets is up in the air, but is it fact that they invented the wheel, writing, calendars, and religion etc? If there are no precursor civilizations using those modalities, then it begs the question, where did it all come from? Where they just a culture of brillant minds? Or what...?
Is Sitchin's tranlation the only one? What is the alternative/competing translation?
DoucheBagster 2 years ago
Sorry but I need to get this off my chest. For those who look at something like this and truly think about it and see it for what it is, you are not some sataric Lucifer worshipper on a highway to hell. You are simply a curious human and I commend every single person like myself that can keep an open mind. This theory is not atheistic in nature and makes as much sense as anything else out there. An open mind is the most powerful thing one can have and with that I end my rant.
peaceouthomee 2 years ago 24
Ending your rant.. I like it Nice words..
That is what I have been telling people to.
Thanks for those words m8t.
Snowman.
Snowman374th 2 years ago
@peaceouthomee Love this post. It's a shame most people are closed.
f56789123 1 year ago
@peaceouthomee I agree that you should keep an open mind, even when approaching theories such as the ones presented in this video. I also agree that this has nothing to do with Satanism except that perhaps some satanic groups adhere to some of these theories. However, I don't agree that these theories make as much sense as 'anything else' out there. There are a literal plethora of factual and logical errors throughout this series which would require almost as long to expose.
ianman6 11 months ago
In addition carbon dating is such an inaccurate way of creating a time line, his theory rests on this time line and on a method that once said a sample from a pencil was over 5000 years old when in reality it was made less than a week prior. Many facts rest upon testing methods that are still not perfected yet, our knowledge is young, we are a young species still. If I am some alien slave I will not lose sleep at night. Accept who we are and lets try to enlighten ourselves to the fullest.
peaceouthomee 2 years ago
prehaps the wood from the pencil they dated was 5000 years old duuhhhh... pencils dont just grow on trees, they are trees
giddygiddy85 2 years ago
Interesting theories especially on the holes in the evolutionary line. He has compelling arguements but my main question is why on Earth would an alien species create a dumbed down version of them to mine gold. If the aliens are so advanced and could manipulate genes, im sure they could have found a way to manufacture gold by some nuclear fusion instead.
peaceouthomee 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this guy has no concept of politically correct language/comments.
humbabwe 2 years ago
I think it's more likely that whatever faction that has been explioting humans wants to frustrate efforts by another faction to open diplomatic relations with humans.
theincredibledouche 2 years ago
I've heard about the vatican (or whoever) plot to create an alien threat to unify the world (under their control presumably). I think it is more complicated than that though. If stichin was making that stuff up why would they not promote his ideas in the mass media? Why would the U.S. go into Iraq and confiscate or destroy artifacts (the Iraq national museum was looted in the war supposedly americans took tablets out of the basement)?
theincredibledouche 2 years ago
It's interesting but he never answers the question I had from the beginning...so what? What difference does it make what our origins are? I never have understood why the creationist get worked up; I never have understood why the scientist care what the creationist think, and, I don't know why you care either.
What difference would this actually make to your life? We have bigger problems than who or what created us. I just don't get it. But like I said, it is interesting.
1SnarfyDude 2 years ago
they wanted copper also, google ancient
cooper mines in michigan
kosh2001 2 years ago
wow i really am going to study more about this stuff amazing
jimcrowful 2 years ago
If this is true and there are "Annunaki" on this planet who is passing our galaxy in just 3600 years, then...
... we are fucked! :D
Because i personally would like to kill a stupid asshole-species that is ENSLAVING themself and is finding 1000 of excused to do so.
Im really not proud to be an european, who has traveled in history overall in the world, killed the natives of amerika ( the real and redscinned people) and robbed africa of his ressources.
We deserve nothing really...
VocaloidDTM 2 years ago 2
We have been hoodwinked by all governmental Institutions, these findings are absolutely brilliant, enjoyed every moment.
19Deborah66 2 years ago
Uhmmm You should at the Last part where he realy gets excited ..
' it is TRUE, the truth, They are liars ' etc.. Most fun..
FromDimmuLand 2 years ago
thats some brilliant knowledge, and its extremely hard to find fault with his arguments. im starting to think, they began our civilizations, and ater the great global cataclysm around 10000 years ago, the annunaki began dying out, and we began finding remnants of their cities and sacred sites and built on top of them, using myths and religion to help usunderstand the stories we had from before. hotep
gangstadread 2 years ago 2
humans on this planet are still young
MrMrfazle 2 years ago
ok so the first part of my comment didnt show up and i dont feel like typing out the entire story again. basically i watched this series of vids, it got me thinking, i thought about it while looking at the stars in the backyard and listening to my roommates play music, then i noticed two stars moving together in unison (sometimes not exact unison), across the sky in an arc, then back around in the original direction. !!??!? awesome.
sleepingwhale 2 years ago 2
Ive seen the similar thing , two of them , and I thought Sattalites ofcourse.
But then one of them took a 90 degree turn East, that made me take this serious.. And Pye is good, it makes sense and it fits the evidence..
FromDimmuLand 2 years ago
Comment removed
sleepingwhale 2 years ago
So what happened between 200k years ago and Sumeria? Just digging gold? What prompted them to teach civilization all of a sudden?
phektus 2 years ago
thanks alot for uploading this. great eye opener and some interesting stuff in there. cheers
bardyl1991 2 years ago
The reason we use gold AND silver for money all around the world is that it looks good, it easily divisible, is rare and will last forever. Doesn't have anything to do with aliens. Also if alienscame here for gold in spaceships to protect their planet, why wouldn't they just use the Earth for their next home. Alot of holes and half truths in this guys theory.Although alot of gold at the Canadian Central Bank has gone missing. Perhaps aliens stole it!
Scottnice 2 years ago
We can out endurance run many animals on the open plain. This was a huge advantage to all previous humans that evolved in jungles. Why would aliens wanting slave labor in mines, engineer us to be able to run away? Seems counter productive. Also the discovery of seeds and agriculture did have a sudden effect on civilization, but look at the sudden effect of electricity and a few more things lately.
We've gone from horse and buggy to the moon.
scottdaddy39 2 years ago
Something to consider. Our advantage was to be able to adapt to different climates and systems, something rare in the animal world. This required much abstract thinking and alot of brain. Our technological evolution surpassed our natural one, and we left the "Garden of Eden" and don't seem to belong. Our genes suggest we thinned out to almost extinction at one time then rebounded. That explains the large number of recessive mistakes. Inbreeding will do this.
scottdaddy39 2 years ago
Questions: Why did they engineer us 200K yrs ago but not use us until 6th century BC in Sumera? There are 30k year old human tablets with star scenes carved on them, but they wondered and hunted, not an ordered work force.
Rapid leaps in evolution are the norm in the record for many species. Its a result of a strong pressure on the pop. He possibly explained himself why lack of interim Homo's. Some climates, like jungles, produce no fossils.
scottdaddy39 2 years ago
@scottdaddy39 - 6th century bc ? ancient sumeria was established an estimated 6000 years ago making it in the region of the fourth millenia bc
chancevaught78 1 year ago
one question im confused on. not that i doubt it, im opened minded. but yeah, about the big foot in russia mating with men and giving birth to their children...how, when it would have 48 chromosones and the men would have 46
tomthebeerassassin 2 years ago 2
I have watched a russian documentary about this made in 70's I think. They had the same info this guy mentiones and the children they claimed were born but dead. There might have been one girl that lived but somewhat retarded. They didn't get much detail because the villagers were really backward and only a few of them actually recalled some oral stories about it.
chernomo 2 years ago
you are good, that is a perfect point and I want that answered too.
dmtirino 2 years ago
Good. We need different views on how everything works. Very thorough facts. I'm going to keep an eye out for this guy, he knows what he's talking about.
0radicalred 2 years ago 5
intresting theorys!
DMCpro6944 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Anyone who believes this joke, needs to be fucking shot.
Seriously, I cannot believe anyone would even go to that and watch it. Get a fucking grip people.
That man needs putting in the back of a white van, and never heard of or seen again.
DomePiece99 2 years ago
Comment removed
trulypeaceful 2 years ago
Indeed.
nikoguitarshow 2 years ago
all the proof is here folks, just one thing sticks out, it doesnt make sense to me that they would use humans to mine gold since they are so technologicaly advanced they would have machines and robots to do that and would probably use the humans to build their cities but since humans arent really all that strong it makes more sense that they would use us as servants, butlers etc.
lomparti 2 years ago
If they had all this knowledge about genetic engineering, why wouldn't they use some form of technology that would eliminate the need for slaves, slaves are a primitive way of getting things done.
xapxnecro 2 years ago 2
primitive yes, effective definately, we humans still use slaves today, machines that do our jobs for us without any compensation, our capitalistic society is a form of slavery by introducing debt. slavery works!!! lol
maximusTLP 2 years ago 3
The whole story of the Anunnaki and how they were here for gold and made us mine for gold... it fits so perfectly for man's affinity for gold... Why? You can't eat it or drink it. There are much more rarely (and thus more valueable) metals.. why is Gold so important to us? it was made such...why have almost every ancient culture viewed gold as "the metal of the gods"? simply because that's exactly what it was... and I'll tell you why... One of the questions with the far flung Nibiru theory...
iroquoisfalls 2 years ago 2
that i get asked all the time is... how can Nibiru survive being so far out? it would be too cold... True... under most circumstances... but this is where the gold comes in... you see, any advanced culture, once they have the sophistication to do so, would create what is known as a Dyson's Sphere... For those that don't know what it is, it's an artificial field or blanket wrapped around the planet to trap it's heat and energy... mainly the planet's natural geo-thermal energy to heat the planet..
iroquoisfalls 2 years ago 2
doing such would protect the planet from freezing when it's flung out so far away... any advanced civilization would create a dyson's sphere simply because it makes sense to do so (unless that planet has greedy energy tycoons like our planet, then you'd have some problems getting free energy). Well, this is what would be the case with Nibiru... simply for the survival of their planet... and according to theory, one of the main metals one would need for a dyson's sphere... is gold...
iroquoisfalls 2 years ago 2
And then we have the case for the "winged globe" effect that we hear and read about with Nibiru... we have here the gold again... the sun's reflection off the dyson's sphere, with it's gold particles, would cause that glowing, winged globe effect... there is some science to this whole Nibiru mystery... I, of course, am only touching the tip of the iceberg, but i don't have enough room to explain it here on Youtube comments section., LOL
iroquoisfalls 2 years ago 2
Wow, I watched the whole thing, apparently you guys aren't paying attention. He is using what we call "circular arguments". Assume something to be true then use it to prove itself. It's the same thing the orthodox jews use to prove their Torah(first five books of the bible). Many of his statements are just not true regarding science and scientists. You guys should really research things before commenting.
autohckr 2 years ago 2
So this reminds of the children of the god who came to earth and had sex with Female Humans.
Even the bible says it lol
So children of the god were the aliens.
kenzeus 2 years ago
and the bible says about how god told his angels to bow down to us.
dlpariah01 2 years ago
I kind of agree with the slave idea, because that would explain how there are a lot of people living as peons just content living paycheck to paycheck. And how religion and "genetics" are hand in hand maintaining the slave.
Very interesting. this guy could be a Galileo of our time, not getting the recognition in his lifetime, or a quack like Nostradomus. Who knows, just keep an open mind I think that's the most important lesson we should learn from school, but most miss...
TyrannyStudios 2 years ago
I do agree with the slave race idea also.. but I also think about the exploding of a planet that makes up our astroid belt adding the question>What caused the exsplosion? and why?
i don`t believe it`s a natural event!
Two thing have to be addressed RH negitive blood Non monkey blood and the astroid belt exsplosion.. No one waking up is going to be happy until these two thing are taken into acount and exsplained with out having a cover stories to hide something behind these events.
clnmyjts 2 years ago