Added: 4 years ago
From: beatlesuploader1000
Views: 15,656
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (49)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Sorry. A correction to the last sentence of my previous comment: "They would NOT have recorded as much music together." One word can make a world of difference.

  • Yes, The Beatles always sang each other's songs. They either wrote them as a team, or individually, but the most prolific songwriters among The Beatles were Lennon and MCCartney. Harrison was the third most prolific, although he rarely got more than 1 or 2 of his songs onto a Beatles album. Starr only wrote a few of his own songs while he was with The Beatles. If they weren't willing to perform each other's songs, they would have recorded as much music together.

  • OH MY GOD YYYEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESS­SSSSSSSSSS I LOVE THREE COOL CATS

  • Where can i find all The Thirty Days album on the internet ?

  • Was that McCartney belching at 2:34? Classic!!

  • omgeezy. wrecked.

  • I like how everyone did eachother's stuff.

  • Their worst performance of this legit song. The Decca tapes were way better, this is just them wasting tape.

  • amazing

  • genius.

  • lay off the boos boy lmao

  • lol paul mccartney has the blackest vioce ever lol

  • AMAZING!!!!!!

  • Pauls'voice better in the Beatles

  • AWESOME Three Cool Cats version!

  • lennon had a really good "rockstar" voice, just like kurt cobain did. paul had a better voice "musically"

  • @FuzztoneProductions I agree... Kurt Cobain had a wonderful voice box. The hotel maid who scraped it off the ceiling saved it in a pickle jar...

  • @jzerony ok ignorant fuck

  • Comment removed

  • scarper guy; wikipedia is a PUBLICLY compiled encyclopedia, thus subject to the errors of the PUBLIC!

  • john isn't out of tune on backing vocals on Pepper. on what song do you claim to have heard this. nor is he out of key on run for your life.

  • Oh, it's Wikipedia's opinion stolen by somebody else

  • very kool..wished they would of backed him more w/vocals on so tired.

  • Comment removed

  • That McCartney technically had a better voice.

  • Right. George Martin said that Paul was such a good singer that when he doubled tracked himself, his pitch and timing was so precise, it sometimes sounded like one vocal instead of two.

    John had more raw character to his voice, (which is very appealing) but as I've been listening through the Beatles' discography, John (a fair amount of the time) is out of key (ie Sgt Pepper backing vocals) and tends to try too hard (ie Run For Your Life) where it makes his vocals not fit as well in the track.

  • maybe paul could manipulate his voice better...but that does not mean he had a better voice! Are you guys kidding? John had such a distinctive, raw, voice...no one could compare to John's voice ... not in the Beatles, and not anywhere else. its part of what made him

  • Well, I don't agree with you....

  • The second song sounds like Get Back, probably Paul based his song on this one.

  • three cool cats was singing in the decca audition in 1962

  • Paul should have sang lead on 'I'm So Tired' on the White Album. He does it better.

  • Why dont you like John's song of Im So Tired?

  • I should rather say John's version of Im So Tired?

  • It;s not that I don't like it, I just think Paul does a better job singing it. I like John lennon's version of Get Back as well.

  • It;s not that I don't like it, I just think Paul does a better job singing it. I like John lennon's version of Get Back as well.

  • It;s not that I don't like it, I just think Paul does a better job singing it. I like John lennon's version of Get Back as well.

  • Comment removed

  • @Sonovox01 he did look up the anthology version

  • @residentevlidead Ah Cool! Thanks! I retract my previous question lol!

  • simply absurd

  • Not absurd at all: John said himself he would have sung Oh darlin' better than Paul, because it was more "his style"; actually I find Paul's voice simply amazing on this song, I know he trained days and days to sing it as good as he could. But god I would also have loved to hear a version by John!

  • Actually Paul didn't train at all, it was quite the opposite. Paul wanted a raw, "first thing of the morning" feel to his vocal. He'd come in, first-thing, to record a take and if he didn't like it he'd do again the next day.

  • Are you crazy or deaf or both ?

  • Nobody can sing I am so tired like John Lennon.

    He was the best vocalman of the Beatles. The magazine Rolling Stone put him on 5 as best singer of the world. Bye!

  • luv it! Amazing!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more