@jericoparazo The main problem would have been the mechanical complexity, since the early helicopters all used an ordinary engine. It might not have worked as well as the Osprey, but it still would have worked, had there been sufficient interest and dev time.
@jericoparazo The main problem would have been the mechanical complexity, since the early helicopters all used an ordinary engine. It might not have worked as well as the Osprey, but it still would have worked, had there been sufficient interest and dev time.
@jericoparazo The main problem would have been the mechanical complexity, since the early helicopters all used an ordinary engine. It might not have worked as well as the Osprey, but it still would have worked, had there been sufficient interest and dev time.
@leiefilm They did. The early ones had lots of problems that didnt go away until they got modern computers onboard to controll stuff that no pilot had a chance to react to.
@Lonewolf6565 Wrong sir, Air Force has the CV-22, and has had them for awhile, and Being a Crew Chief for the MV-22 I know for a fact, we have way more than 20 In the Corps.
@Lonewolf6565 thats funny cause 2 more vmm squadrons just stood up at macas miramar and are expected to get from 10-12 aircraft, so i think there are definitely more. not too mention vmm-161 which already has 7 ospreys, then you got the squadrons on mcas new river. seems like more than 20 to me.
in april of this year the air force only had 12 in use with the 8th 71st and 20th SO squadrons to ferry SOCOM troops replacing the pavelows
the vmm 161, 162, 261, 263, 264, 266, 364, vmmt 204, vmx22 all have 83. vmmt 204 and vmx22 have them for training and testing. the rest of the vmm's have around ten but most arent used all the time and are stored in the squad hangers. they are still limiting use since replacement parts are hard to get and are trickling in as they are produced.
@Bosleyish please understand that there are way more than 20 around the various squads but they arent using all of them. give them another year and they will likely all be up in the air regularly. they are just hard to get the parts for at the moment.
@Lonewolf6565 No thats also false. My squadron alone has 10, and there are 6 more squadrons on the east coast who have 10 each. Not sure bout west coast, there is only 2 squadrons that have stood up over there and transitioned from 46's. Trust me this aircraft is my life. I know just about everything about them.
Any idea how these would cope landing in a stronge cross wind, would they not be forced to fly into in and land cos the props only can turn 90 up 90 down ????
They havent crashed in 9 years.....the USMC has dozens on order and dozens in operation....and the Airforce uses them for special ops missions....They are also slated to go international...
they couldnt figure out why for a long time as the problem wasnt mechanical. there was a phenomenon never before seen occurring with the airflow as the engines turned up or down and the whole thing would loose lift. once they figured out it was an airflow thing between the engines they found a way to get it to work properly.
they couldnt figure out why for a long time as the problem wasnt mechanical. there was a phenomenon never before seen occurring with the airflow as the engines turned up or down and the whole thing would loose lift. once they figured out it was an airflow thing between the engines they found a way to get it to work properly.
i saw 3 flying over my school bus in formation evryone was like look at that plane im like its a plane and a hellicopter they didnt balieve me until one started to hover
Not only have they been used in Afghanistan, but also in Iraq, as Gen. James Conway, commandant of the Marine Corps, reported in today's briefing.
Paraphrased: MV-22 3rd tilt rotor squadrons in Iraq. Osprey squadrons flew every type of assault support mission required in Iraq. Most impressive was the way it was able to shrink the battle space, reducing a battlefield the size of Texas to one the size of Rhode Island.
You said a third rotor in the middle. There's no where to fit a third rotor, let alone let it be retractable. How fast would it be able to deploy in an emergency situation? You lose a wing, you are screwed no matter what. You might as well apply that logic to every airplane ever created. "Well they can put an emergency rotor in the middle just in case a wing is blown off." It's not practical.
It would not need wings, I am essentially saying that if it were flying at a high enough altitude when hit it could convert to a helicopter format and drop the wings via parachute.
Yes it is. If the wings are taken out, then one or both of the rotors are taken out. The aircraft can't fly on one emergency rotor. That combined with the impracticality of the idea, it just wouldn't work.
You are thinking in terms of the limits of modern technology, I however am thinking in terms of the future.
With enough visionary engineers and finance this would be an easy development, the world is constantly changing therefore one must maintain an open mind and be ready to embrace the future.
@Lonewolf6565 Depends on the design, if it used autorotation, or tip jets, I suppose it could fly with just one rotor, but what that guy was proposing was utterly impractical.
osprey is shit, the mechanism is fucked, 10's of osprey went down randomly cause of computer failure and many marines died...what a piece of shit, stick to the black hawk
There has been 4 major incidents with the V-22 were the crew was killed. As tragic as the deaths are, that's not that bad. The UH-60 was plagued with problems in the beginning too, and look at how successful it is now. And the USMC doesn't use Black Hawks, they use Sea Knights.
I remember the first time I rode in one. I had no Idea what it was. I was like "What the fuck is that thing? It flies?" we where doing HALO traning drills those things are great
This has been flagged as spam show
@jericoparazo The main problem would have been the mechanical complexity, since the early helicopters all used an ordinary engine. It might not have worked as well as the Osprey, but it still would have worked, had there been sufficient interest and dev time.
Cadeyrnable 4 months ago
@jericoparazo The main problem would have been the mechanical complexity, since the early helicopters all used an ordinary engine. It might not have worked as well as the Osprey, but it still would have worked, had there been sufficient interest and dev time.
Cadeyrnable 4 months ago
@jericoparazo The main problem would have been the mechanical complexity, since the early helicopters all used an ordinary engine. It might not have worked as well as the Osprey, but it still would have worked, had there been sufficient interest and dev time.
Cadeyrnable 4 months ago
@jericoparazo The concept dates back to at least the Germans in WW2 and the Fa 269.
Cadeyrnable 4 months ago
lol.. they've been TRYING to develop these since WWII. I've seen this design in books YEARS ago.
MrFlowDrummer 10 months ago
i was hooked on the osprey after seeing it in half life opposing force :) best thing ever!
praetorian2150 10 months ago
its a a bird its a plane its(pauses) what is that
MegaBannaphone 11 months ago
V-22 Widowmaker :D
YanYan1337 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
benaughty lady Travel around the world **benaughtyman.info**
nilukamadav 11 months ago
BTW, it's spelled O-S-P-R-E-Y.
JamesEndsor 1 year ago
The sound is a few seconds early to the picture. Try and fix that.
Rick1885 1 year ago
Dear Santa...
vasilikosolov 1 year ago
my god.. bell + boeing= God's pet bird
RoldanIncorporated 1 year ago
My god a helicopter good for making a good entrance. and running like a pussy
RoldanIncorporated 1 year ago
I've heard they had constant problems with the osprey.not to mention that a hole bunch of them has crashed and burned
leiefilm 1 year ago
@leiefilm They did. The early ones had lots of problems that didnt go away until they got modern computers onboard to controll stuff that no pilot had a chance to react to.
nordicberserk 1 year ago
@nordicberserk okay thanx for the info
leiefilm 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FOLLOW THESE STEPS 1.COVER YOUR MOUTH WITH YOUR HAND 2.WHISPER A WISH INTO YOUR HAND 3.COPY AND POST THIS ON TEN OTHER VIDEOS 4.LOOK AT YOU HAND
colorfashionme07 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FOLLOW THESE STEPS 1.COVER YOUR MOUTH WITH YOUR HAND 2.WHISPER A WISH INTO YOUR HAND 3.COPY AND POST THIS ON TEN OTHER VIDEOS 4.LOOK AT YOU HAND
colorfashionme07 1 year ago
its a bird, its a plane, WTF IS TAHT?
quangluu96 1 year ago
"What the hell is that?" LOL
Scioneer 1 year ago
Just saw one of these fly overhead
koppen67 1 year ago
(Lag)...
Ronin1914 1 year ago
Just add 4 jet engines and you got the Halo Pelican
Ratkill9000 1 year ago
Just like the BMW X6, u never know wtf it is, even u buy one.
nerv0582 1 year ago
Dont forget the Airforce, flying these things.
SCOPEHAPPY 1 year ago
@SCOPEHAPPY
the only branch that has any of these is the marine corp they have 20. the air force hasnt bought any yet..
Lonewolf6565 1 year ago
@Lonewolf6565 Wrong sir, Air Force has the CV-22, and has had them for awhile, and Being a Crew Chief for the MV-22 I know for a fact, we have way more than 20 In the Corps.
sf6191 1 year ago
@sf6191
they have a ton. but they are only using 20 active service...
Lonewolf6565 1 year ago
@Lonewolf6565 thats funny cause 2 more vmm squadrons just stood up at macas miramar and are expected to get from 10-12 aircraft, so i think there are definitely more. not too mention vmm-161 which already has 7 ospreys, then you got the squadrons on mcas new river. seems like more than 20 to me.
Bosleyish 1 year ago
@Bosleyish
in april of this year the air force only had 12 in use with the 8th 71st and 20th SO squadrons to ferry SOCOM troops replacing the pavelows
the vmm 161, 162, 261, 263, 264, 266, 364, vmmt 204, vmx22 all have 83. vmmt 204 and vmx22 have them for training and testing. the rest of the vmm's have around ten but most arent used all the time and are stored in the squad hangers. they are still limiting use since replacement parts are hard to get and are trickling in as they are produced.
Lonewolf6565 1 year ago
@Bosleyish please understand that there are way more than 20 around the various squads but they arent using all of them. give them another year and they will likely all be up in the air regularly. they are just hard to get the parts for at the moment.
Lonewolf6565 1 year ago
@Lonewolf6565 No thats also false. My squadron alone has 10, and there are 6 more squadrons on the east coast who have 10 each. Not sure bout west coast, there is only 2 squadrons that have stood up over there and transitioned from 46's. Trust me this aircraft is my life. I know just about everything about them.
sf6191 1 year ago
Its called an Osprey, not an Ofsprey, numb nuts.
FrozenEMT 1 year ago 4
Any idea how these would cope landing in a stronge cross wind, would they not be forced to fly into in and land cos the props only can turn 90 up 90 down ????
airforcesuk 2 years ago
and 90 to the side ;) 5:16 in the background
IDudessonI 1 year ago
1:08 check out the air station's sign! FTW ^_^
customcartoons 2 years ago
I hear the problem was they kept crashing lol
08Evasion 2 years ago
WRONG!!!!
bigmuscles621 2 years ago
They havent crashed in 9 years.....the USMC has dozens on order and dozens in operation....and the Airforce uses them for special ops missions....They are also slated to go international...
K0diak314 2 years ago 2
That's exactly what I keep telling people!! We have crashed at least one of everything else since the last Osprey crash.
crhrocket22 1 year ago
@08Evasion
they couldnt figure out why for a long time as the problem wasnt mechanical. there was a phenomenon never before seen occurring with the airflow as the engines turned up or down and the whole thing would loose lift. once they figured out it was an airflow thing between the engines they found a way to get it to work properly.
Lonewolf6565 1 year ago
what was the problem with these a while back?
LoSeRLuCk1 2 years ago
@LoSeRLuCk1 wiring, pilot error, same as always...
PlayBackWalkthroughs 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LoSeRLuCk1
they couldnt figure out why for a long time as the problem wasnt mechanical. there was a phenomenon never before seen occurring with the airflow as the engines turned up or down and the whole thing would loose lift. once they figured out it was an airflow thing between the engines they found a way to get it to work properly.
Lonewolf6565 1 year ago
i saw 3 flying over my school bus in formation evryone was like look at that plane im like its a plane and a hellicopter they didnt balieve me until one started to hover
TheArcticFALLOUT 2 years ago
lol i see those fly over my house :P
endofhumans 2 years ago
Nice video and all, but uhm...it's V-22 Osprey, not Ofsprey
TheAceOfHearts89 2 years ago 3
its a bird , plane, helicopter what the hell is it
oglocchristian 2 years ago 10
ITS A ROFLCOPTER!!
z4crad 2 years ago 8
lmao nice
kingypoo1 2 years ago
HM3 dustin "doc" martin. god bless the navy, god bless the corps. stay strong my brothers, you are not forgotten.
antesignani 2 years ago 23
This has been flagged as spam show
The Enclave use that in Fallout 3
killerbees177 2 years ago
I can't wait till the coast guard gets a squadron or two of these birds for search and rescue or drug interdiction
Jager1967 2 years ago 5
Im a 6326; Avionics Technician for the V-22 at New River...
LCpl Espinosa
DillardxDUH 2 years ago 5
Holy crap! It's a Fallout Vertibird!
ChiotVulgaire 2 years ago 33
yeah xept the 1's in fall out look cooler
whats ur GT?
cod5glitchesandmore 2 years ago
Bad
lordhashi 2 years ago
@ChiotVulgaire get out the fatman!
outputs3 1 year ago
@ChiotVulgaire Where did you think Bethesda got the idea Jackwagon?
FrankDaTank1218 1 year ago
@FrankDaTank1218
except bethesda didn't get the idea. Interplay did in fallout 2
thefuzzyone69 6 months ago
@FrankDaTank1218
Bethesda didn't, interplay did in fallout 2 jackwagon
thefuzzyone69 6 months ago
@ChiotVulgaire where do u think fallout got there idea from
guitarist4747 9 months ago 2
Not only have they been used in Afghanistan, but also in Iraq, as Gen. James Conway, commandant of the Marine Corps, reported in today's briefing.
Paraphrased: MV-22 3rd tilt rotor squadrons in Iraq. Osprey squadrons flew every type of assault support mission required in Iraq. Most impressive was the way it was able to shrink the battle space, reducing a battlefield the size of Texas to one the size of Rhode Island.
alexnapad 2 years ago
Well the latest V-22's are great. 'cept it's called the Osprey, not Ofsprey. They've already been used on sorties in Afgan.
Xephisto 2 years ago
lol "I want one!"
Same here buddy!
CrystalHunter1989 2 years ago
its osprey not ofspray
cortana458 2 years ago
you know this thing isnt new at all its acually pretty old , but due to a crash they had to recall it
Emovamp64 2 years ago
dude i saw 2 in new mexico a couple weeks ago
motci54 2 years ago
urah
ronaldweasleyfan55 3 years ago
its oorah
knottsscary 3 years ago
nothing will replace the big planes like the c120 and the c5 galaxy. this thing cant haul tanks like they can.
NonConformistNetwork 3 years ago
No shit. Thats not what it's for. It's for special operations infiltration, exfiltration and rescue operations.
archaeaffxi 2 years ago
It needs a third emergency rotor in the center in case a wing is hit.
dawnninjawolf 3 years ago
You're not an engineer. A third rotor would just add excessive drag, while adding almost nothing. If a wing was hit, the aircraft is screwed anyway.
EnigmaHood 2 years ago
I may not be an engineer but it is highly logical that a heavy helicopter can fly better with 2 rotors.
On that note it would not create much drag if it could fold away inside the helicopter.
dawnninjawolf 2 years ago
You said a third rotor in the middle. There's no where to fit a third rotor, let alone let it be retractable. How fast would it be able to deploy in an emergency situation? You lose a wing, you are screwed no matter what. You might as well apply that logic to every airplane ever created. "Well they can put an emergency rotor in the middle just in case a wing is blown off." It's not practical.
EnigmaHood 2 years ago
It would not need wings, I am essentially saying that if it were flying at a high enough altitude when hit it could convert to a helicopter format and drop the wings via parachute.
The third rotor is not so useless now is it?
dawnninjawolf 2 years ago
Yes it is. If the wings are taken out, then one or both of the rotors are taken out. The aircraft can't fly on one emergency rotor. That combined with the impracticality of the idea, it just wouldn't work.
EnigmaHood 2 years ago
You are thinking in terms of the limits of modern technology, I however am thinking in terms of the future.
With enough visionary engineers and finance this would be an easy development, the world is constantly changing therefore one must maintain an open mind and be ready to embrace the future.
dawnninjawolf 2 years ago
@EnigmaHood
thats funny. you cant fly a regular helicopter with just one rotor either.
Lonewolf6565 1 year ago
@Lonewolf6565 Depends on the design, if it used autorotation, or tip jets, I suppose it could fly with just one rotor, but what that guy was proposing was utterly impractical.
EnigmaHood 1 year ago
osprey is shit, the mechanism is fucked, 10's of osprey went down randomly cause of computer failure and many marines died...what a piece of shit, stick to the black hawk
andrezor24 3 years ago
There has been 4 major incidents with the V-22 were the crew was killed. As tragic as the deaths are, that's not that bad. The UH-60 was plagued with problems in the beginning too, and look at how successful it is now. And the USMC doesn't use Black Hawks, they use Sea Knights.
Zbojnik 3 years ago 2
MAN I WANT TO FLY ONE TOO!!!
SGTSAM101ST 3 years ago
gunny went apeshit at 6:50 hahaaa
CaptainCool07 3 years ago
Your comment made my day LOL.
Fred5612 2 years ago
USMC Orrah
reddevilneck 3 years ago
wow there gonna be awesome wen they switch propellers 4 jets.
XboxEliteMan 3 years ago
I remember the first time I rode in one. I had no Idea what it was. I was like "What the fuck is that thing? It flies?" we where doing HALO traning drills those things are great
popers25 3 years ago
you spelled Osprey wrong at the tittle...
TheThinkTanksKid 3 years ago
anyone know where I can get video of the episode covering the strategic operations training?
jbfirstdown22 3 years ago
"snoop and poop" LOL
Mittelmorder 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
fnfbiurne torw vbtwerot7yvowvybroyvwebtwbvitwvbvberwit wyeyir
forthood2008 3 years ago
Great video! thanks amer1cancer2753!
gabricontractor 3 years ago