the dems don't want to look at fannie and freddie because they created it and they take money from these guys and now it's gone bad and they're trying act like they didn't know about. all you have to do is google "s.190". in 2005 obama and ALL the dems voted against a reform bill that would have fixed all this shit before it happened. they are all on the fucking take. when is the press going to do their JOB and report on this shit. the media should no longer be given privelage in our society,
you see,suggesting a commision doesn't preclude doing other things as well, which appears to be what Obama is suggesting that Mccain is suggesting. Just today Obama said he wouldn't offer his proposals until after he heard what the FED would do. BUT I THOUGHT IT WAS URGENT!!! Where's the leadership? You mean he wants to wait a bit to find out whats going on before making a proposal? Here's a thought. How about also having a comission, meeting and panel with various people just to get an overview
If it takes weeks to put together a panel (and I'm assuming even longer to put together a commision) then obviously his suggesting that he would put together a panel wouldn't address issues that had to be addresssed NOW. That might be handled by MEETINGS for example.
See, you can advocate a comission to determine long term solutions and at the same time also have meetings with advisors and SEC heads and even panels in the interim. Are you unaware of this?
Kilmeade says the bill McCain supported was killed in a Democrat congress, but the Dems didn't take over until AFTER the 2006 elections. Besides, even the republicans said that the White house was against the proposal in question. If McCain was such a huge supporter of the measure in 2005, why didn't he cosponser a similar bill in 2007?
That's a great formulation for who is winning and losing. So no matter what, if you have to explain then you lost.
You've been explaining what Obama meant by commission, and what constitutes a crisis.
And I certainly appreciate an obama supporter admitting that the Iraq war hasn't been a crisis for the last five years. You can't imagine how many libtards I have tried to explain that to. It just never penetrated their thick skulls. Till now. Congratulations. You finally got it.
So, in the same speech obama said that he would setup an advisory panel to deal with the current economic crisis. What exactly is the difference between a committee and an advisory panel in your mind?
you'll note that Obama has been part of many committees on various topics, so its not like he's against them (ie 9/11 comittee committee on social security.
But he's also set up advisory councils like the Latino Advisory Council.so how does an advisory group differ from an advisory council, differ from a commitee? Has he set up any panels to look into issues too?
He also set up an advisory group to discuss his vice presidential pick. And who was on that again?CEO's from Fannie Mae perhaps?
He's meeting with a panel today, you spend weeks picking a commission and then send them out to pasture. Need any other explanations of basic DC politics?
Please, how long does it take to put together a panel versus a comission? It takes time to put together a pane too. But at any case, what ultimately is the difference? Sounds like the commision is the more balanced approach anyway, and the panel the more adhoc one according to you. In other words, to get some quick advice you call some people and meet immediately. To delve more deeply into an issue and hear from all sides you empanel a commission.
And at any rate, to distinguish your leadership from your opponets by ridiculing his suggestion that he would setup a comission versus your setting up a panel is really arguing over a distinction without a distinction.
How is empaneling a panel somehow a mark of leadership while setting up a commision, not? And vice versa. Both are simply saying they will get a bunch of experts to look into the of the issue and propose solutions. Panel versus commision is simply using synonyms for the same thing
The funniest thing about thiswhole thing is that in the same speech only a few minutes later Obama says he would call for an "Advisory Group" to meet with the president regarding the current economic scenario.
Ah yes, comissions are bad (despite the fact that Obama has been for so many of them) and the oldest trick in the book. But advisory groups.... now that is some serious leadership. His other idea is to put together a council and or a gathering of economists and maybe even a panel.
i dislike my choice's for president! ah well!
IgniteStudent 3 years ago
As a descendant of a Revolutionary War Hero (they were all heroes), Im exempt from any further bad news regarding America.
Optimistically pessimistic,
Unconcerned Citizen
UnconcernedCitizen 3 years ago
"57 states". That's all that needs to be said about Obama.
DRTYFN 3 years ago
the dems don't want to look at fannie and freddie because they created it and they take money from these guys and now it's gone bad and they're trying act like they didn't know about. all you have to do is google "s.190". in 2005 obama and ALL the dems voted against a reform bill that would have fixed all this shit before it happened. they are all on the fucking take. when is the press going to do their JOB and report on this shit. the media should no longer be given privelage in our society,
cffalk 3 years ago
except obama now says he isn't going to offer a proposal until he hears from the FED. Sounds like a lack of leadership.
I hear those minutes ticking by... tick tock tick tock....
jr565 3 years ago 2
you see,suggesting a commision doesn't preclude doing other things as well, which appears to be what Obama is suggesting that Mccain is suggesting. Just today Obama said he wouldn't offer his proposals until after he heard what the FED would do. BUT I THOUGHT IT WAS URGENT!!! Where's the leadership? You mean he wants to wait a bit to find out whats going on before making a proposal? Here's a thought. How about also having a comission, meeting and panel with various people just to get an overview
jr565 3 years ago
If it takes weeks to put together a panel (and I'm assuming even longer to put together a commision) then obviously his suggesting that he would put together a panel wouldn't address issues that had to be addresssed NOW. That might be handled by MEETINGS for example.
See, you can advocate a comission to determine long term solutions and at the same time also have meetings with advisors and SEC heads and even panels in the interim. Are you unaware of this?
jr565 3 years ago
If they're going to spend $700B, I would rather they take their time. A LOT of time.
ArnoldGallagher 3 years ago
ArnoldGallagher, I could not agree more. When there is that much money involved of OUR money, they had better take their time and spend it wisely.
rsmrtiddles 3 years ago
Kilmeade says the bill McCain supported was killed in a Democrat congress, but the Dems didn't take over until AFTER the 2006 elections. Besides, even the republicans said that the White house was against the proposal in question. If McCain was such a huge supporter of the measure in 2005, why didn't he cosponser a similar bill in 2007?
EZSuds 3 years ago
Dear lieinv,
That's a great formulation for who is winning and losing. So no matter what, if you have to explain then you lost.
You've been explaining what Obama meant by commission, and what constitutes a crisis.
And I certainly appreciate an obama supporter admitting that the Iraq war hasn't been a crisis for the last five years. You can't imagine how many libtards I have tried to explain that to. It just never penetrated their thick skulls. Till now. Congratulations. You finally got it.
papertigero 3 years ago
So, in the same speech obama said that he would setup an advisory panel to deal with the current economic crisis. What exactly is the difference between a committee and an advisory panel in your mind?
jr565 3 years ago
you'll note that Obama has been part of many committees on various topics, so its not like he's against them (ie 9/11 comittee committee on social security.
But he's also set up advisory councils like the Latino Advisory Council.so how does an advisory group differ from an advisory council, differ from a commitee? Has he set up any panels to look into issues too?
He also set up an advisory group to discuss his vice presidential pick. And who was on that again?CEO's from Fannie Mae perhaps?
jr565 3 years ago
He's meeting with a panel today, you spend weeks picking a commission and then send them out to pasture. Need any other explanations of basic DC politics?
lieinveigleobfuscate 3 years ago
Please, how long does it take to put together a panel versus a comission? It takes time to put together a pane too. But at any case, what ultimately is the difference? Sounds like the commision is the more balanced approach anyway, and the panel the more adhoc one according to you. In other words, to get some quick advice you call some people and meet immediately. To delve more deeply into an issue and hear from all sides you empanel a commission.
jr565 3 years ago
And at any rate, to distinguish your leadership from your opponets by ridiculing his suggestion that he would setup a comission versus your setting up a panel is really arguing over a distinction without a distinction.
How is empaneling a panel somehow a mark of leadership while setting up a commision, not? And vice versa. Both are simply saying they will get a bunch of experts to look into the of the issue and propose solutions. Panel versus commision is simply using synonyms for the same thing
jr565 3 years ago
ROFLMAO.
If Obama and Biden think this is working, it ain't!
kehvan 3 years ago
Make the BUSH TAX CUTS PERMANENT!!
Why should the rich pay more for social programs like education, healthcare, and housing?!?! The middle class are the ones using these services!!!
McCain 08!!!!
USPatriot4life 3 years ago
That's so patriotic, I'm just speechless
spoier 3 years ago 2
Well, at least you're an honest horrible person.
lieinveigleobfuscate 3 years ago
if voting becasue hes black that means mccain will win since more whites
but you are a FUCKING MORON
nlcatter 3 years ago
The funniest thing about thiswhole thing is that in the same speech only a few minutes later Obama says he would call for an "Advisory Group" to meet with the president regarding the current economic scenario.
Ah yes, comissions are bad (despite the fact that Obama has been for so many of them) and the oldest trick in the book. But advisory groups.... now that is some serious leadership. His other idea is to put together a council and or a gathering of economists and maybe even a panel.
jr565 3 years ago 2
It's funny how so many people work to assemble credible, logical arguments against the idea of an Obama presidency, like this clip.
It won't have ANY EFFECT!
Why?
Simple. Those voting for Barack Obama don't care in the least about reason and logic!
They're voting for Balack BECAUSE HE'S BLACK! DUH!
And no reasoned argument will give any pause to their ANTI-WHITE HATE!
Better wake-up America, because the anti-white haters smell blood. They want to ethnically-cleans America till it's BRAZIL!
Craigbe 3 years ago