Yu-Gi-Oh! Deck of the Month April 2010 Synchro Cat

[kungfumaster12]

the gravekeeper deck was fine with out the gay cat synchro concept... not need.. just using the original complete gravekeeper deck.. with it's burn combos... and royal tribute with ruthless denial.. is enough.. power for 2 or 3 turn kills...

[megageek1996]

pot of avarises confict with necrovalley

[RolandoV214]

ill trade you gravekeepers viosionary super rare for 1 ancient fary or black wing armor master

or stardust or black rose

[BleachKing245]

Excuse me im intrested in a Mat can u tell me the types and price ty

[EndofChaos22]

great, it's been shutting down Infernity and Dandywarrior quite well

[Mostimpressiveindeed]

How's this deck working out now?

[05Robinho]

where do you guys play? i challenge you all bra =P

[05Robinho]

where do you guys play? i challenge you all bra =P

[MostWantedEm]

-1 Dark Armed

+1 Cyber Dragons

Just because of the lack of Dark monster and the 2 Pot Of A. I Didnt Realy think DAD Realy Helped in this Deck.

[Mikeydat99]

Isn't that rite card playing into the hand of infernity?

[EndofChaos22]

hence Ancient Fairy Dragon, Storm, MST, Trunade , etc

That's why this build works well. I can play around Pot by putting another Necrovalley over the 1st face down then Pot and then flip Necrovalley.

[xCravenblood]

you can't pot with necrovally on the field

[TheDragonmaster18]

@xCravenblood yes you can cause pot isnt targeting

[xCravenblood]

@TheDragonmaster18 ok, this is old lolz

[TheDragonmaster18]

@xCravenblood yeah cause i looked the ruling up on wikia and there was nothing about pot of avarice on it. just like at nationals this year they tried to make a dumb ass ruling saying that grnad mole cant bounce back synchros but the judges failed on that ruling so it never happened

[DarkArmedDragon8240]

good deck

[Rassouljah]

intresting build, seems fun to play against, im going to sub to you, see what ya got, feel free to sub back, im going to be making videos real soon, give me a shot, lol, haha, later.

[WTFDuelist]

Lol you should call it GraveCat :)

[punchdrunkrock]

You are bad. I got to say it, really bad.

[EndofChaos22]

I know about Pot I mention that in the video.

But you can also set another Necrovalley face down over the first. Then play Pot and then flip the Necrovalley.

Priestess has been ruled by judges here to pump by 700 ATK. Just like Maiden of the Aqua.

Priestess gains the pump effect of Necrovalley just not the grave effect

[toxictonic12888]

ur april fools joke is late bc u need to know ur rulings b4 u make a deck. u cant use pot of avarice bc it targets cards in the graveyard and u cant pump ur gravekeepers up by 700 with just priestess.

[andylucky]

Preistess does not add 700 ATK. She only pumps up the GKs in the deck by 200, and it has been mentioned in numerous rulings.

[And2TaProduction]

this deck is pretty much based on field control and hand control

[DarkDuelist17]

Priestess does not get the effects of Necrovalley, it only makes the field count as necrovalley to use effects you could only use when necrovalley is on the field ex. Royal Tribute, Gravekeeper's assailant.

[EndofChaos22]

no no, Priestess also acts as an active Necrovalley. It allows for a 500 ATK pump but the grave effect of Necrovalley does not apply. Priestess herself pumps for 200 for a total of 700 ATK. I checked and it's confirmed. She will pump all GK by 700 total. But if she is on the field WITH Necrovalley then still only by 700 ATK and not 1200ATK. (Hope that helped)

[PrinceKumori108]

i checked the ruling on priest she only boost 200 but like if u need to use royal tribute or gravekeepers assailants effect it counts as necro valley still guud deck !