Easily the greatest super band ever assembled. Richards on bass, Lennon on vox/rhythm, Clapton on lead, and Mitchells on drums! FUCKING OUT OF THIS WORLD!
@eamond619 now imagine, if Jack Bruce sang the vocals.... my god, he would kill this song. Nothing against John, i love him, but his voice isnt "blues-y" enough.
i remember seeing footage of this performance here on youtube years ago. if someone can get the video please post it, im pretty sick of this copyrights bullshit.
And to say "he's just a poet" is to say people like T.S. Eliot and Shakespeare had nothing good to say about anything, and that they weren't artists. I think you'll find that to not be the case.
Think about what you are saying. In your theory, the "greatest" musicians could enthrall an audience playing a dissonant chord without rhythm for 40 minutes. What you misunderstand about music is that it contains melody and structure. Jazz is the perfect example of this. Half of the emotion evoked in music comes out of the way the melody and chords interact. And in this respect, John and Paul were geniuses, and deserve every ounce of credit they get. Music is WRITING music, I hate to say.
There are musicians who are masters of both technicality and emotion, (Jeff Beck, John Bonham, etc) and those people are the greatest musicians. Words shouldn't have anything to do with it. You could have a band cover the ABC song and make it sound good. Music is sound, am I right? The best musicians could sing Twinkle Twinkle Little Star and evoke emotion from an audience. John was a great writer, but that certainly doesn't make him a musician. He should've just written books. What a jerk.
@cowhyde72 Obvious Troll is Obvious-John Lennon was a terrible musician hahahahah that must be why when you go to a real school to learn about music like Berkeley they talk about Beethoven, Bach and Lennon/ Maccartney.
It was getting old hearing him say "The Rolling Stones were copying The Beatles, we came first, we're better" crap. Not only was he famous, but he was a huge douchebag, with an ego the size of texas. And his guitar playing and singing could not suffice to it. There are two kinds of musicians. The technical, and the emotional. There are musicians who put so much emotion into their work that it doesn't matter how technical they are, although Lennon doesn't fit into that. He's a poet. Nothing more.
Let me put this out here. I know this will start a fight, but I really don't care about people's opinions anyways, so here goes.
John Lennon is one of the most horrid "guitarists" I've ever heard. His powerchords can barely hold up with Clapton in this. He is a horrible musician. I think you all down below are mixing up a musician with a poet. He was a wonderful writer, but his shrill (flat) singing, "guitar playing", and girlfriend were beyond awful. He would talk shit about other musicians too
Hello Vortigern99... of course i had to revisit, since you are so well written, and John Lennon's vocals are great but the warped record blues guitar here does not me take me there.
@1962jet Taste is funny that way. 53, 712 views and only one dislike, evidently yours! And yet you are totally convinced your opinion is the correct, or at least the most tasteful one. Well. Allow me to be the first to disagree. This performance is electrifying.
excellent song, 3 of these guys were on heroin lol, the other song they did however ("Whole Lotta Yoko") is terrible thanks to Yoko's screeching, goddamn she's terrible
where is the live video version dammit and yes keith is on bass. the live show has lennon and jagger sharing aplate of food and yoko kneelingin front of keith R. But my favorite is lennons rythem playing on a ROCK song old days late 50's influence! Any fan of any of these players should get to watch this!
Without being rude to the Fabs, the fact that this version is better than the Beatles one is due to the guitarists. None of them Beatles could be described as master musicians....it's the songWRITING that made them world leaders, not the playing.
@ProjectFlashlight612 You do realize you just said that none of The Beatles were master musicians? What makes a good musician? All of the Beatles were exceptional musicians in every respect of what could be described as a musician.
@tomtom255 Everyone calm down. I was simply pointing out that they are legends because of their song writing genius, and rightly so, and NOT for being master musicians. Yes, Harrison was a fine guitarist, and all four Fabs could play well...but not BRILLIANTLY well, like Clapton or Townshend or Hendrix. Listen to the Get Back Tapes, and try to tell me that those endless hours of often horrible jam sessions don't back up my point. They couldn't even JAM properly by 1969, so rusty were they.
@ProjectFlashlight612 Ok, I think you completely missed what I was talking about. You are clearly talking about playing instruments or being a flashy guitar player, which is about 1/10th of what being a musician is about. Just because you can bang out a fancy solo does not make you a good musician. There really is almost no point in saying this guitar player is better than this one because it's virtually impossible to quantify what makes one guitarist the best.
@tomtom255 I think we agree more than you think! There are technically proficient guitarists and drummers and so on, with their respective well-known figures (eg Slash, Ginger Baker, Stuart Copeland, Clapton etc) and then there are those musicians who are known for their WRITING genius. G, J and P all fall into the latter slot. I think the main problem is that they could never hear themselves live, so never got to be a top gig act. The Japan '66 gigs are an exception - very well played gigs
@ProjectFlashlight612 George harrison was a great guitarist... and he could play something this complex they just wanted to keep it simple... when you redo a song live you always add a bunch of licks and shit
@ProjectFlashlight612 Paul was an exceptional bass player. George was a great guitarist. Ringo was a decent drummer (nothing special, but not terrible like some morons try to make out). John could play a bit of everything (similar to Paul).
@alwayswinit4real Oh, for the love of Xenu, is this STILL going? Let me say it yet again...the Fabs were good musicians, not GREAT ones, IMHO. They were master songwriters, beyond any doubt, but it is ridiculous to claim that any of them were virtuosos at playing their respective instruments. Consider While My Guitar Gently Weeps - why hire Clapton to do the guitar solo if you know you are good enough to do it yourself? Answer: cos you're not big-headed enough to think you ARE. :)
Terrific! -- this is take one, the better take of the two (or are there three -- difficult to tell with all of the various audio versions around). Clapton's solo is the most dynamic here (IMO) and Mitchell's fills are really electrifying.
Yer blues John, yer blues.
smcmu1len 1 week ago
Easily the greatest super band ever assembled. Richards on bass, Lennon on vox/rhythm, Clapton on lead, and Mitchells on drums! FUCKING OUT OF THIS WORLD!
EvilAnticsLive 2 weeks ago
is this clapton playing?
ledzeppelinfan3520 2 weeks ago
@ledzeppelinfan3520 Yeah!! The Super Band!
Giomiller 2 weeks ago
KILLER!!
josephw28 2 weeks ago
clapton rules!!!
fhthbvisjfhfjkf 3 weeks ago
cuzzz im loneelyy!!!
wanna die!!!!!!!!!!!
im LONELEYY
wanna dieee
igessthsisgrwnup 1 month ago
Keith Richards on bass.
TheChap36 1 month ago
I got this on vid, wish i could share it
peacemanken 1 month ago
lennon's like WOW!!!!
chilango7259 1 month ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
o my god i hate john lennon. but mitch mitchell is amazing
dirtyxmexican 1 month ago
@dirtyxmexican man he has a good bluesy voice
powertothehippiesman 1 month ago
the best song
maurolujan666 1 month ago
Their combined talent is over 9000!
Sabb99GL 1 month ago in playlist Liked videos
Does Eric Clapton tear this song apart or what?
mahavishnuxc 1 month ago
CLAPTON IS GOD!!!
eamond619 2 months ago
@eamond619 now imagine, if Jack Bruce sang the vocals.... my god, he would kill this song. Nothing against John, i love him, but his voice isnt "blues-y" enough.
mahavishnuxc 1 month ago
@eamond619 WAS
fanzappa 1 month ago
nothing Nothing compares
3acalmaca 2 months ago
Oh... What happen?! My hears?? Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaouuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu!!!!!
TheSuperNgolo 3 months ago
Genius! Why is it only one song? :(
floepdoos 3 months ago
Pure gold!
fredzeo 3 months ago
if only they all made a one off album... *imense
MrPenfoldjr 3 months ago
Eargasm!
LordGeorgeRodney 4 months ago 2
I need to go change my pants again
JayJitzuKru 5 months ago
Look at the size of the Leslie cabinet that Clapton is sitting on!!!!
CanogaParker 5 months ago
Comment removed
G8GT364CI 2 months ago
funny how they were makin fun at the blues guys with this & it turned out to be a great blues song.
tremold2043 5 months ago 3
God imagine if they made a full album together. Pure genius !
meucury8eye 6 months ago 31
@meucury8eye we're not and never will be, ready for that kind of album.
mahavishnuxc 2 months ago
This is like the most emo song I've ever heard.
mrbloodytit 6 months ago
@mrbloodytit No, this is called "The Blues". Emo is the worst genre of music (I use that term lightly) ever devised.
alwayswinit4real 5 months ago 13
Gods were playing blues together !
eliterinoa 6 months ago in playlist Yer Blues Compilation
Comment removed
igessthsisgrwnup 6 months ago
If you ever wanted the definition of a supergroup - this is surely it. Wish they'd done more together.
fuzzface100 6 months ago
Hell yes!
hammer44head 6 months ago
i remember seeing footage of this performance here on youtube years ago. if someone can get the video please post it, im pretty sick of this copyrights bullshit.
WhoIsPine 6 months ago
@WhoIsPine they have it on google videos
Intheflesh44 6 months ago
do they have anymore music??
TheWtrick 6 months ago
wish they recorded more, so much energy to this...
ihvamullet 7 months ago
1 person wants beatles back
Marjosz 7 months ago
aie aie aie.. AIEEEEEEEEEEEE PUTAIN CEST BON!
SofieneRock 7 months ago
And to say "he's just a poet" is to say people like T.S. Eliot and Shakespeare had nothing good to say about anything, and that they weren't artists. I think you'll find that to not be the case.
Rayelroy 7 months ago
Think about what you are saying. In your theory, the "greatest" musicians could enthrall an audience playing a dissonant chord without rhythm for 40 minutes. What you misunderstand about music is that it contains melody and structure. Jazz is the perfect example of this. Half of the emotion evoked in music comes out of the way the melody and chords interact. And in this respect, John and Paul were geniuses, and deserve every ounce of credit they get. Music is WRITING music, I hate to say.
Rayelroy 7 months ago 2
There are musicians who are masters of both technicality and emotion, (Jeff Beck, John Bonham, etc) and those people are the greatest musicians. Words shouldn't have anything to do with it. You could have a band cover the ABC song and make it sound good. Music is sound, am I right? The best musicians could sing Twinkle Twinkle Little Star and evoke emotion from an audience. John was a great writer, but that certainly doesn't make him a musician. He should've just written books. What a jerk.
cowhyde72 7 months ago
@cowhyde72
umad
nvb2005 7 months ago 3
@cowhyde72 Obvious Troll is Obvious-John Lennon was a terrible musician hahahahah that must be why when you go to a real school to learn about music like Berkeley they talk about Beethoven, Bach and Lennon/ Maccartney.
tomtom255 6 months ago in playlist Music
Comment removed
rolesi92 6 months ago
Comment removed
rolesi92 6 months ago
@cowhyde72 what a load of rubbish
gietek 6 months ago
Comment removed
MrCaptain221 6 months ago
Comment removed
MrCaptain221 6 months ago
It was getting old hearing him say "The Rolling Stones were copying The Beatles, we came first, we're better" crap. Not only was he famous, but he was a huge douchebag, with an ego the size of texas. And his guitar playing and singing could not suffice to it. There are two kinds of musicians. The technical, and the emotional. There are musicians who put so much emotion into their work that it doesn't matter how technical they are, although Lennon doesn't fit into that. He's a poet. Nothing more.
cowhyde72 7 months ago
Let me put this out here. I know this will start a fight, but I really don't care about people's opinions anyways, so here goes.
John Lennon is one of the most horrid "guitarists" I've ever heard. His powerchords can barely hold up with Clapton in this. He is a horrible musician. I think you all down below are mixing up a musician with a poet. He was a wonderful writer, but his shrill (flat) singing, "guitar playing", and girlfriend were beyond awful. He would talk shit about other musicians too
cowhyde72 7 months ago
This is the best supergroup ever! I'm like raping the play button because this is a GODLY recording!!!
Rambo4699 7 months ago
lennon and his troupe of stupids moneys :)
drooba 7 months ago
@drooba english is not your first language, i'm guessing.
fanzappa 1 month ago
shit shit shit, lennon should never quit the beatles, asshole.
drooba 7 months ago
the beatles version is better
SgtPeppersification 7 months ago
Better than the beatles.
ThePrinceDhani 7 months ago
Nice to hear what the 3 of them sound like with Mitch Mitchell!
bogarnath 7 months ago
Hello Vortigern99... of course i had to revisit, since you are so well written, and John Lennon's vocals are great but the warped record blues guitar here does not me take me there.
1962jet 8 months ago
@1962jet Oh, well, to each his own and all that. Some people don't like fried chicken, either! Can you imagine such a thing? ;-)
Vortigern99 8 months ago in playlist 60s Rock
Bieber dislikes it. What a jerk !
louisferrant 8 months ago
pretty turgid, funny that John Lennon falls prey to his own criticism on the brit blues scene, courtesy of ec... good god, this is a snooze-a-palooza
1962jet 8 months ago
@1962jet Taste is funny that way. 53, 712 views and only one dislike, evidently yours! And yet you are totally convinced your opinion is the correct, or at least the most tasteful one. Well. Allow me to be the first to disagree. This performance is electrifying.
Vortigern99 8 months ago
0 dislikes! there is still hope!
Movy132 8 months ago
man where the fucks the video????????
MrMagneticfields 9 months ago 2
CLAPTON IS GOD!
Lmximo 10 months ago
excellent song, 3 of these guys were on heroin lol, the other song they did however ("Whole Lotta Yoko") is terrible thanks to Yoko's screeching, goddamn she's terrible
toomermcshockey 10 months ago 2
not a vid... but atleast it ain't a p.o.s### crap video... I thought M.Jackson had ruined all he could...guess i was wrong.
why won't people pick on "Slim Pickin's" or " James Brown" anymore???
at least "J.Brown" had a continuous rythym in his "court" to go against/with...
shit!!!!!!!! Pick-up a friggin' book!!!!!!!!!!!!
stop makin' your s))t over "rythm&blues" music....pls
jlennon2010 10 months ago
the best group on the history
BGmaRKO19 11 months ago
where is the live video version dammit and yes keith is on bass. the live show has lennon and jagger sharing aplate of food and yoko kneelingin front of keith R. But my favorite is lennons rythem playing on a ROCK song old days late 50's influence! Any fan of any of these players should get to watch this!
hippiepsycopathz 11 months ago
is keith on bass?
hujaqaa 11 months ago
Without being rude to the Fabs, the fact that this version is better than the Beatles one is due to the guitarists. None of them Beatles could be described as master musicians....it's the songWRITING that made them world leaders, not the playing.
ProjectFlashlight612 1 year ago
@ProjectFlashlight612
But the Beatles are still great musicians right :(
ACX352395 10 months ago
@ProjectFlashlight612 You do realize you just said that none of The Beatles were master musicians? What makes a good musician? All of the Beatles were exceptional musicians in every respect of what could be described as a musician.
tomtom255 9 months ago
@tomtom255 Everyone calm down. I was simply pointing out that they are legends because of their song writing genius, and rightly so, and NOT for being master musicians. Yes, Harrison was a fine guitarist, and all four Fabs could play well...but not BRILLIANTLY well, like Clapton or Townshend or Hendrix. Listen to the Get Back Tapes, and try to tell me that those endless hours of often horrible jam sessions don't back up my point. They couldn't even JAM properly by 1969, so rusty were they.
ProjectFlashlight612 7 months ago
@ProjectFlashlight612 Ok, I think you completely missed what I was talking about. You are clearly talking about playing instruments or being a flashy guitar player, which is about 1/10th of what being a musician is about. Just because you can bang out a fancy solo does not make you a good musician. There really is almost no point in saying this guitar player is better than this one because it's virtually impossible to quantify what makes one guitarist the best.
tomtom255 7 months ago
@tomtom255 I think we agree more than you think! There are technically proficient guitarists and drummers and so on, with their respective well-known figures (eg Slash, Ginger Baker, Stuart Copeland, Clapton etc) and then there are those musicians who are known for their WRITING genius. G, J and P all fall into the latter slot. I think the main problem is that they could never hear themselves live, so never got to be a top gig act. The Japan '66 gigs are an exception - very well played gigs
ProjectFlashlight612 7 months ago
@ProjectFlashlight612 You're just confusing the terms musician and instrumentalist. Otherwise I think we all agree.
CentraCross 7 months ago
@ProjectFlashlight612 And there really is no right or wrong way to Jam, it's really just fucking around.
tomtom255 7 months ago
@ProjectFlashlight612 George harrison was a great guitarist... and he could play something this complex they just wanted to keep it simple... when you redo a song live you always add a bunch of licks and shit
unocname 7 months ago
@ProjectFlashlight612 Paul was an exceptional bass player. George was a great guitarist. Ringo was a decent drummer (nothing special, but not terrible like some morons try to make out). John could play a bit of everything (similar to Paul).
alwayswinit4real 5 months ago
@alwayswinit4real Oh, for the love of Xenu, is this STILL going? Let me say it yet again...the Fabs were good musicians, not GREAT ones, IMHO. They were master songwriters, beyond any doubt, but it is ridiculous to claim that any of them were virtuosos at playing their respective instruments. Consider While My Guitar Gently Weeps - why hire Clapton to do the guitar solo if you know you are good enough to do it yourself? Answer: cos you're not big-headed enough to think you ARE. :)
ProjectFlashlight612 5 months ago
@ProjectFlashlight612 Paul was one of the best bass players ever. That's a fact.
alwayswinit4real 5 months ago
The late great Cream Michael, the late great...
0000AllFitness0000 1 year ago
who plays the bass onn this? was it keith? sorry if that's stupid but I know keith played bass on some of the stones stuff.
nintendonut100 1 year ago
@nintendonut100 I think Keith did play bass on this. He's playing one in the picture.
galipooh 1 year ago
I love it. Take me back to the 70's
MrHdfans 1 year ago
@MrHdfans To 68!!
vitorum100 11 months ago
DIRTY MAC FOREVER
spacenoise5 1 year ago
Unity among musicians is a thing of the past.
RockNRollOverDose 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I know this may be sacrilege, but...in my humblest of opinions, THIS version is superior to the version on THE BEATLES.
likew0wman 1 year ago
I know this may be sacrilege, but...in my humblest of opinions, THIS version is superior to the version on THE BEATLES.
likew0wman 1 year ago 3
The Beatles + Cream + The Jimi Hendrix Experience + The Rolling Stones = WIN
drrobertoboogie97 1 year ago 102
Wow, I like this version more than the original, and I'm a Beatles fanatic...
Herringish 1 year ago 2
the best supergroup!!
pastyhead78 1 year ago
I've seen the video this is big bull poo. mic jagger starts them off and yoko is kneeling oddly in front of jagger!
hippiepsycopathz 1 year ago
i wanna hump Joe Pesci
hakeb117 1 year ago
Terrific! -- this is take one, the better take of the two (or are there three -- difficult to tell with all of the various audio versions around). Clapton's solo is the most dynamic here (IMO) and Mitchell's fills are really electrifying.
Vortigern99 1 year ago
John Lennon + Eric Clapton + Keith Richards + Mitch Mitchell = Sonic Awesomeness
drrobertoboogie97 1 year ago 2
who else but john could assemble such talent
jmaxcamp 1 year ago 2
thats cool they got mitch in on it to..he is a great drummer
theman8083 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@zankplus check out my page, I have it posted.
brianthehippy 1 year ago
for a band with only one song, this is my new favorite band
residentevlidead 1 year ago
@residentevlidead They also did "Whole Lotta Yoko" and "Blues Jam"!
Vortigern99 1 year ago
the video is on google videos still
gilo87 1 year ago
Did YouTube really take down the actual video WTF?
hendrix950 1 year ago
@hendrix950 I think they did, which royally pisses me off. The video was amazing. Song is still amazing though.
zankplus 1 year ago
keith is amazing on the bass <3<3 hes killing it! :D
port10483 1 year ago 2
@port10483 - actually keith richards played bass on most of the Stones' best songs
1954telecaster2 1 year ago
great song
CaliKid74 1 year ago
Awesome line up, and great song!
MrNonnel 1 year ago 5
mick jagger: yer blues john..yer blues...(lol)
MsHappYthoughts 1 year ago 41
@MsHappYthoughts So high lmao
Noseheros 1 year ago
freakin awesome
swiftassassin89 1 year ago
What about the video??
natobelli 1 year ago 2