WHEN WILL PEOPLE UNDERSTAND THAT IT IS GOD WHO CREATED US AND EVERYTHING WE SEE & DON'T SEE! LOOK AT THE ECONOMY, THE NATURAL DISASTERS, AND THE WATERED DOWN STRUCTURE OF THE CURRENT GENERATION OF THE WORLD. LOOK AT THE LANGUAGE THAT IS USED ON TV TODAY! I WASN'T A ANGEL BUT IN THE 80'S WE DIDN'T HAVE THE FOUL LANGUAGE ON TV THAT WE HAVE TODAY, THIS IS JUST A SMALL EXAMPLE OF THE GARBAGE THAT EVIL PRODUCES AND SUGAR COATS THE END OF TIMES! DON'T BE FOOLED, BE RENEWED AND REPENT, I DID, ITS REAL.
@qtube2000 yes, if not santa will write you down in his bad boy book! (oops, wrong fairy tail) god sent down superman to save us all! YOU ARE ALL EVIL WHEN I FIND MY CAPSLOCK BUTTON! argh, im not crazy! doomsdaayyyy! its not fake, its just invisible, you cant see any diffrence and you have to give a little cash! IM SERIAL
Pretty much everything in this video is utter nonsense. The "scientific dead end" has lead to all modern technology including the computer you are using to read this comment.
If life was designed, the designer was pretty incompetent to include so many defects (our jaws are too small, our backs are bad, we have genetic diseases, etc etc). Also, every "irreducibly complex" system that ID proponents have put forward have been explained through evolutionary processes.
@Nanofuture87 have you heard of sin??????? ya its there.....and you believe that we just came about for no reason? and we see color why? why do we look alot like ppl from 1920? oh wait cuz we dont evolve,
You believe that we just came about for no reason? If you mean that I believe that we weren't intentionally created, then yes.
We see color why? It's an evolutionary advantage to be able to easily distinguish similarly shaped objects, in our case fruit.
Why do we look a lot like people from 1920? There are actually a lot of reasons. Two of them are it's only been two generations and we have a global community.
"Darwin's theory is pretty widely excepted by any serious scientist/Bioligist."
so is man-made global warming/climate change, and that turned out to be a hoax (climate gate). universal scientific concensus based on little to no fact or evidence is pure dogma.
"universal scientific concensus based on little to no fact or evidence is pure dogma."
That's true, and since evolution has lots and lots of evidence in various scientific fields independently verifying the predictions of Evolutionary Theory and is in fact an observed natural process, there's no way any educated person could justify calling it dogma.
you sound like the global warming alarmists before climate-gate
Well, thats interesting, because I never mentioned anything about global warming. ??
I guess when you hear something you disagree with, you write it off as global warming alarmist propaganda regardless of what subject is actually being discussed. You must be really smart, haha.
apparently smarter than you as you cannot distinguish the correlation i made between global warming alarmists (how they turned out to be wrong and global warming is now confirmed not to be man-made) and evolutionists. your quote that i responded to, though pertaining to evolution, obviously, sounds very much like what the global warming alarmist say. thats why i said you sound like one. now that you have been educated, feel free to try again. but try to be coherent this time.
"apparently smarter than you as you cannot distinguish the correlation i made between global warming alarmists (how they turned out to be wrong and global warming is now confirmed not to be man-made) and evolutionists."
So if global warming turned out to be wrong and evolution has been thoroughly confirmed, how are they correlated again? Please educate me. Lol.
i'll be happy to educate you further, apparently you are having a hard time with this. you said that evolution has been thoroughly confirmed (it has not and you cannot cite any evidence to prove it, but that is a different point altogether) which is exactly what the GW alarmist said about the climate before global warming was disproven. i was simply commenting on how similar you sound to them, and how ironic it is that evolution is not true either.
@jndillaha : Creation is right LOL: That is why 101 bible colleges out of 106 teach : Genesis is allegory . Even your most christian institutions don`t seem to believe in biblical creation.
@lizazoon This is the teaching of amillenial covenant theology which is based on an allegorical interpretation of Scripture as opposed to a literal one This is the dominant teaching in most theological seminaries and has been for decades. As an example, there are 106 schools in the Christian College Coalition. Of those 106 only 5 teach a literal interpretation of the Genesis account of creation or that the flood was global
i assume you will refuse to give me the information. its easy to claim something, but to back it up is quite different. evolution is false, i heard it from a scientist. look it up.
Evolution is not random - natural selection is not random. it is the survival of the best fitted group of randomly different entities. The best properties get passed on during hundreds and hundreds of generations.
@adybeermonster Man can engineer molecules! It shows how it takes INTELLIGENCE in controlled laboratory conditions to mimic, manipulate, plagiarize a cell's Design! Scientists COPY genetic sequences!! They dont create anything!!
Its all Man made Synthetic chemistry! and it has nothing to do with the origin of life!! Homochirality is a disaster for any sort of naturalistic origins! There is no demonstrated source for such non-racemic mixture of sugars in any plausible pre-biotic environment!
@DARRBEV Man can engineer molecules! It shows how it takes INTELLIGENCE in controlled laboratory conditions to mimic, manipulate, plagiarize a cell's Design! Scientists COPY genetic sequences!! They dont create anything!!
Its all Man made Synthetic chemistry! and it has nothing to do with the origin of life!! Homochirality is a disaster for any sort of naturalistic origins! There is no demonstrated source for such non-racemic mixture of sugars in any plausible pre-biotic environment!
@ 02:40 "Dragged the scientific world to a dead end for the past 150 years!" Right, and we had men walking on the moon and computers before Darwin? That was so funny I just about pissed my pants! Little wonder the people who believe this shit end up freaking. it's things like this that make me believe that we are evolving into two seperate species. One will hold the future and the stars, and the other will be back on the plains of Africa, running from lions.
Creationism is proof of the evolution of stupidity. Those who deny evolution need it most.
On the every clockmaker comment: if we were made by god, then what made god? God does not simplify our understanding of the universe. How is there an omnipotent being that controlls the universe? that is obviously much more complicated than just accepting that we dont know how the universe was created. Mankind is not able to wonder, we must have an answer for everything, and we will accept any answer
i just wanted to let you know evolution never states that we evolved from anything on the present day, cuz everything you see today are present day animals that evolved from previous animals. so to say that us evolutionist believe that we evolved from a modern day animal is just ignorant and stupid
thats quite the ignorant statement, dont you agree? i mean you believe in fossils of other animals that show a distinct pattern of animals evolving but you are to ignorant to accept that people have found fossils of prehuman
No, I have never seen fossils that show "a distinct pattern of animals evolving" and neither have you because they don't exist. Scientist find small fragments then let their imaginations run wild with what they think they could be. The theory of evolution has never been proven through fossils or by any other means, that's why it's still a theory.
well im gunna try and find this video i watched recently that proves your statement about those fossils not existing, wrong.
and if you dont believe in evolution, thats your loss. but try in explain the new mutations of virus'? how is new variations of the flu not a process of evolution?
Trust me, no youtube video will convince me that the THEORY of evolution is true. It has never been proven, if it had then it wouldn't be called a theory. And about this "new variation of the flu" it's not actually new, it's been around for years and is likely man-made. Either way it's just a combination of porcine, avian and human flu strains. If you make kool-aide is that an example of water evolving?
Fossils are timed by radioactive timing methods, set on a timeline and then can be seen how they change during tens and hundreds of thousands of years. Try visiting a museum of natural history sometime.
@tomas LOL..RNA has been copied using templates and bases..and without digital information and DNA..this RNA world is going no where..you also still have the major problem of Homochirality..Inserting bases into molecules is not creating anything..its copying..I see the media has brainwashed ? you..Please tell me the next step lets what you make next lets say you thousands of pairs of RNA..You have ZERO molecular machines..for assembly instructions...RNA molecules floating around is life?..LOL
@tomaselvis You make no sense Moron..you think pharmaceutical drugs cure people...LOL.. LOL..They are using Million dollar Synthesizing machines..to copy..to get it started..with just the right Temperatures..so the RNA wont get destroyed..yeah and all this happened on a primordial earth..you think I was born yesterday moron..lol
@tomaselvis spontaneously generation,and abiogenesis is impossible!!!..There is plenty about it..Venter himself starts with bases and templates, and Synthesizing equipment..you dont just put your chemicals in a test tube and it forms..LOL
@tomaselvis They first used chemical precursors with a lot of phosphate. Then they used a process of drying and wetting to get the nucleotides to stick together. They artificially created short RNA molecules that were randomly sequenced. They didn't arise as self replicating entities with genuine genetic information by themselves, which is what it seems you would have us believe...with just right temperatures..then everything is carefully copied and transcription..is synthesized..
Even with all the Proteins and DNA and RNA ...What would you do with it??..from there you have zero molecular machines, zero assembly instructions...all this stuff would just float away in some primordial soup and break down..and it would be the same thing in a test tube
@tomaselvis . If evolutionists had optically pure DNA, RNA, and amino acids, and they still would have nothing. In fact, the energy needed to form the bonds to make the macromolecules necessary for a cell, will destroy any DNA, RNA, and amino acids that are outside of a cell.
@5tonyvvvv you do know DNA wasnt in the first life forms right? DNA evolved.. just because we dont know everything, doesnt mean its not right. learn about science DUUDE
@oaaserud Intelligence is needed to create software code or assemble a computer! FAR MORE intelligence is needed for the assemblance of the first Cell and thereby DNA. A DNA code is far more complex in design than All the Worlds Softwares COMBINED!! Therefore we can deduce Intelligent DESIGN! Homochirality and hydrolysis would prevent life from ever starting! It is chemically and mathematically impossible for a single protein to form by chance!
@oaaserud You have been Indoctrinated to believe that! Lets see amino acids organize themselves?? Molecules can not order themselves! Learn Homochirality!!
@oaaserud Homochirality is a disaster for naturalistic origins. All amino acids in proteins are 'LEFT-handed', while all sugars in DNA and RNA, and in the metabolic pathways, are 'RIGHT-handed'. Chirality!
A 50/50 mixture of left- and right-handed forms is called a racemate or racemic mixture!!. Which life can't use!! Its what we see in nature and in labs!
Life never came about by time chance natural processes! IMPOSSIBLE!!!
@5tonyvvvv one of the first sentences i read about it: "The origin of this phenomenon is not clearly understood". as i said, just because we dont know how everything happens, does not mean it some super magic.
@tomaselvis Intelligence is needed to create software code or assemble a computer! FAR MORE intelligence is needed for the assemblance of the first Cell and thereby DNA. A DNA code is far more complex in design than All the Worlds Softwares COMBINED!! Therefore we can deduce Intelligent DESIGN! Homochirality and hydrolysis would prevent life from ever starting! It is chemically and mathematically impossible for a single protein to form by chance!
@wolfblade8426 Homochirality is a disaster for naturalistic origins. All amino acids in proteins are 'LEFT-handed', while all sugars in DNA and RNA, and in the metabolic pathways, are 'RIGHT-handed'. Chirality!
A 50/50 mixture of left- and right-handed forms is called a racemate or racemic mixture!!. Which life can't use!! Its what we see in nature and in labs!
Life never came about by time chance natural processes! IMPOSSIBLE!!!
I can't believe this... this video doesn't even display a basic knowledge of the Big Bang theory. The Big Bang was not the origin of the universe, it was the major event that caused the universe to begin to expand and cool, as indicated by Einstein's discoveries.
Jeez, most of the people they talk to don't even understand natural selection. Anyone taken in by this video is absurdly ignorant.
LMAO, whoever put this video together obviously did not read Charles Darwin On the Origin of Species. Nowhere in any of his books does Darwin claim or imply that all living things were the result of coincidences. Hell, he/they didn't even read the first chapter. Darwin explains variation and evolution by natural selection as a cumulative process, not something that was just thrown together all at once by chance.
Iron is in our planet Earth and science shows that it came from outer space millions of years ago, plus iron as a substance is good for human body (check this verse revealed from our creator 14 centuries ago) , ALLAH said:
"...And We brought forth iron wherein is mighty power, as well as many benefits for mankind, that Allah may test who it is that will help Him (His religion), and His Messengers in the unseen. Verily, Allah is All-Strong, All-Mighty." QURAN(57:25)
Praise God the creator for all the creation. The cell, the body and all living things are all complex system working, more complex than we can ever imagine... Study the cell and you will become a christian lol :) People just don't want to see there is a God because they are afraid about their bad deeds, and want to continue living for themself..
If I claim to be smart, it means I'm not. Noone knows where we came from. So we could be an accident or we could be created. How can a man claim to be a scientist when he has only made a guess and calls it fact? A scientist must keep an open mind. The Atheist mind is closed. No Atheist can call their BELIEF science, but they do. Macro-evolution is a belief as is cosmic evolution. I only have an average IQ, but I implore you self proclaimed smart people to evolve to the next step...created!
I wouldn't say that. There have been very smart people who were theists. Most of them were, however, at least skeptical of religion. Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Edison, for examples, I would say were intelligent men. In this day and age, however, there is no reason to deny the theory of evolution.
No he denied a god, and hated how lying religious people, took PART of his quote (Quote mine) and then didnt complete the next couple sentences which show he does not believe in a god.
What a load of bollocks. Creationism is a joke. You're a joke if you believe in it. Message me back, and we'll have a good sit down and chat. I'm too disgusted right now to address this video in its entirety.
It's kind of good that the Atheistic Evolutionists Started down this path Specifically to exterminate God under the guise of science. As a forty six year old man that has been interested in God since I didn't believe my teacher that fosils could wait long enough to be covered over such a long period, it is now evident to me, Creationists are doing the science to disprove Macro-evolution 1 discovery and 1 phoney exibit at a time. They should have not staked their future on their religion,Atheism.
You and other fundamenatlists christinas are in the minority. Most christians accept The Theory of Evolution and the fact the earth is way older than 6000 years.
interesting how this movie leaves out that it was christians who developed the scientific method as mentioned in the story of gideon, muslims played little part in it, muslims, like atheists, are hijackers of christian science
Science and religion became separated because it was discovered that religion had no basis of belief except blind faith. Experiments, theories and proven facts make religion the primitive rubbish it is.
Lets face it, is Darwins theory any more fantastic than a big magician in the sky creating the earth in 6 days!
what a load of crap. see a video called bongoman and you'll find all the answers you need to make up your mind about evolution. p.s the video is very short
most of the arguments used are philosophical questions not scientific.
Funny those points... in the "quote" from Gene Myers.
This is another quote from the same article:
"Of course one is free to believe that for any little piece of the detail, God did it...
From the viewpoint of science, we're surrounded by uncertainty, The parts we look at are the parts we don't understand . . . But the scientific belief is that in due course, an explanation will be found."
Sigh... I get tired of these ignorant people. If I would be as ignorant as them; I, as a swede, will follow example and burn my physics book becuase it states that lightning is not the creation of Thor.
Followers of religion are threatened by science, why shouldn't they be? Flying horses and horned demons do not exist, the earth revolves around the sun, etc. Religions get weaker as time goes on. So the religious do what they do best: the attempt to adapt and modify things that are outside their sphere of "reasoning" and use it to their own means.
Science in the service of religion is not science.
Why do religionists need to lie so much in order to make their points sound valid? Because they have no valid facts upon which to base there views, thereby making it neccesary to create "facts". The logical conclusion then is that the one side of the debate telling the most lies is the one that has no facts to back it up.
It never ceases to amaze me how religious fundementalists can both claim moral high-ground and still lie shamelessly, repeatedly, knowingly, and conm=nsistantly, over and over and over again as in this video, which tells one lie after another about the science of biology. --- Gary Williams. Biologist
It seems you can go to Youtube to find plenty of Atheists. They have been very active in down rating all the anti-evolution videos without discussing the facts and evidence presented. They will not let go of their discredited religion that easy.
If these are supposed to be the facts not discussed, the reason is obviopus...they are notr facts, and the process of explainiong why they aren't facts is something known as "education", and cannot be given in the few hunmdreds words allowed here. On the contrary, it allows creationists to lie shamelessly without worry of being exposed.
Just for amusement, I watch creationist videos up to the point when they tell the first major lie.
This one lasted one minute and seven seconds.
Darwin did not claim that life was explained by coincidence. Quite the contrary, he explained how natural selection will invariably drive populations toward better adaptation to their environment.
Educate yourself on a subject before you attack it.
i'd just like to say, that quote of Einstein on the info section isn't the full quote and misrepresents his views as such. the full quote is:
"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."
when questioned about his religion, einstein replied:
"I believe in Spinoza's God, who reveals Himself in the lawful harmony of the world, not in a God Who concerns Himself with the fate and the doings of mankind."
Materialist dogmas of ancient greece! I'm sure they had there share but they were also responsible for the birth of our modern idea of science, philosophy, psychology, astronomy and more! Aristotle, Plato, Pythagoras, Socrates etc etc. Sorry 2:46 was as far as I got...
I love how they use the term "materialist" to insult anyone who doesn't believe in God and actually wants reason and evidence to prove things. You're a "materialist" if you actually think outside the box and don't use faith as a copout. Morons.
This is bullshit. You can't prove or disprove God so just give it up. We should all be agnostics. Trying to prove God through the complexity of the universe proves nothing. Just because the world is complex does not necessarily mean someone had to have created it. There's no, as of yet, discovered scientific law for this.
Crap like this explains our past. Once christians came to power, most other knowledge was quashed. It wasnt until the exchange of goods and ideas from the orient broke us out of it. Then the printing press made copies of the Bible available, and people started to reason again. Oversimplified, but hey, I only get 300 characters.
5They are from the world and therefore speak from the viewpoint of the world, and the world listens to them. 6We are from God, and whoever knows God listens to us; but whoever is not from God does not listen to us. This is how we recognize the Spirit[a] of truth and the spirit of falsehood.
search for this video Holy Bible, Koran, Book of Mormons are Fiction. and look at the guys other videos, his a very intelligent guy who saw the light as a kid and turned his back on it as an adult, he's called FightingAtheist.
but there has always been a judas element in the church that didnt break of to form other churches. galileo was treated unfairly but the church never assumed an absurd position. galileo even has church appointed servants and was held in the apartment overlooking the vatican gardens, then was off to a country side manner. the hiroshima bomb proves the existence of god and the catholic church. since the 8 jesuits 1 km from epicenter were unhurt l. even
DOD us military has this classified and they wonder if an atomic bomb could even damage a holy place like vatican city or fatima ect.. much liker the destroyer passed over the homes with lambs blood. the enemy is spiritual not of flesh and blood. or gun or knife or bomb.
ok first of all, alot of people survived hiroshima. even if that is true about the jesuits, they dont tell you about any other jesuits, priest etc. that were hurt. and as for the destroyer, well the fact is that the exodus as it is written never happened.
galileo was a roman catholic, was friends with the cardinal who became pope. had children out of wedlock. and tried to use his science to have the church reinterpret scripture, but did admit that bible was infallible and was treated fair by the church. his best work was done his inquisition. and they never dasid he was wrong just he couldnt prove it. and even jesuits saw some of the flaws in his arguments.
this video is designed to malitiously confuse you and make you take sides on the matter without telling you any true facts! ASK QUESTIONS! DO NOT FOLLOW BLINDLY LIKE SHEEP TO AN EVIL SHEPARD! ATHEISM IS THE FUTURE! If you are fearful of hell then i suggest you go to this site; godvsthebible (dot com) look for chap.13 on the origin of hell, it will be a huge weight off your shoulders!
24 "And they will go out and look upon the dead bodies of those who rebelled against (GOD) me; their worm will not die, nor will their fire be quenched, and they will be loathsome to all mankind."
"INTELLIGENT DESIGN" IS RELIGION NOT SCIENCE! THE EVIDENCE DOES NOT POINT TOWARDS DESIGN, SCIENCE HAS SIMPLY NOT DISPROVEN IT YET! someday it will but the creationists will still the arguing in vain.
Do not be afraid to ask questions, it is the only proven way to make progress. It is the only thing that sets humans apart from all other animals. Religion discourages questions and so halts progress. If we were all truly faithful then no progress would have been made for the last 300 years.
how come Newton is ok to believe but not Galileo or Darwin? the answer; Newton does not contradict the Bible, Galileo and Darwin do. Dont believe them when they say science is influenced by "material philosophy" science is based on experimentation and evidence and not faith or philosophy. just because science cannot answer all the questions doesnt mean that religion can.
did you notice that they didnt explain how science "proved" creation? did you notice that they didnt explain how it "debunked" evolution? well the fact is it NEVER PROVED CREATION, IT DID PROVE EVOLUTION! if it wasnt for the religious right the theory of evolution would be called the law of evolution by now. dont believe those who say there is no proof in fossils, etc. they simply ignore and slander the evidence.
more missinformation! this video is pretty disgusting to me! how can religion call itself true when it has no proof? how can it call evolution false when there is evidence? did you notice that the first few lines insisted that what it says is false must be false...without any reason or proof? why is it that religion decides what parts of science it likes and which parts it rejects based on which parts agree with their fundimental and UNPROVEN "truths"?......
well that isnt true either and even if it was it doesnt make his theory untrue. just because he might regret it doesnt mean he didnt have the right idea.
EVolution is the ultimate dragon for the Creationists to slay. However they will fight over each other to discount different bits of it. Common descent is rebutted by HOVIND with 'did your grandpa look like a monkey' Dr. Behe concedes it in his own Darwin's Black Box, writing: "I find the idea of common descent (that all organisms share a common ancestor) fairly convincing, and have no particular reason to doubt it" (op. cit., p. 5).
I fully endorse all pedophile worshippers openly show contempt for evolution. evolution is already a reality, the theory itself is used in dozens of industries to create billions of dollars in profits. continue reading ur hatefilled book spawned by the pedophile mohammed.
the philosophy of materialism? What about Capitalism and consumerism which we thrive in? isn't that materialistic philosophy? You point finger at athiest for not believing in God, but it's ok to live in a materialistic and consumer society! Forget about Dawkins folks, there's a bigger fish to fry and that is Capitalism and consumerism....it will be the demise of Democracy!!
10 minutes of statement after statement and not one interesting point. Laughable from a scientific point of view - If you havn't watched this yet, dont watch it unless you fancy a good laugh. As far as presentations of arguments for the god hypothesis go - this is unbelievably poor.
The video talks about how science and religion were in hermony before the 18th century. What about Galileo who was banished because he believed the sun was the center of our solar system, and the church said we were.
also- why doesn't the video explain what they mean by "materialist theories"?
and what does darwinism have to do with it?
and please quit using ad populum arguments.
and please quit appealing to common sense to direct yourself(ves) to truth. Empirical evidence and reasoning quite often go against what is considered "common sense".
why are you trying to confirm/deny evolution based on human size?
If we evolve to be shorter, it is because shorter is more adaptable to the environment in which we live. "taller" is not a universal "better". Whether we grow shorter or taller over time depends on our environment.
RevoJam, I find qiute disappointing, your bizzarre explanation that Americans are getting shorter "because of the advent of cars!!!So that is evolution, isn't it?"
After conceding that there are a lot of gaps in the theory of evolution, it is evident, from your own hypothesis, that there WILL continue to be even MORE gaps in the theory for some light years to come.
PS: I did enjoy your video on economic growth, though.
'sigh' this is pointless really you have your beliefs and I have mine. though I just find it easier to believe we were created instead of believing I'm related to an ape/monkey/etc/.
oooh the argument of wonder "things in life are amazing, therefore a god had to make things"...this argument is circular because it assumes its conclusion.
This is one fat lie and distortion. You are twisted and are trying to twist others. Evolution is a fact - 100% fact and there is nothing you or anyone can do to disprove that fact. The THEORY is the explanation of the mechanism of evolution.
I know a place on Internet where you can buy a toilet paper with printed QURAN on it.
jamesmk2003 2 months ago
The only thing that evolves is Pokemon!! hahaa
wolfblade8426 2 months ago
WHEN WILL PEOPLE UNDERSTAND THAT IT IS GOD WHO CREATED US AND EVERYTHING WE SEE & DON'T SEE! LOOK AT THE ECONOMY, THE NATURAL DISASTERS, AND THE WATERED DOWN STRUCTURE OF THE CURRENT GENERATION OF THE WORLD. LOOK AT THE LANGUAGE THAT IS USED ON TV TODAY! I WASN'T A ANGEL BUT IN THE 80'S WE DIDN'T HAVE THE FOUL LANGUAGE ON TV THAT WE HAVE TODAY, THIS IS JUST A SMALL EXAMPLE OF THE GARBAGE THAT EVIL PRODUCES AND SUGAR COATS THE END OF TIMES! DON'T BE FOOLED, BE RENEWED AND REPENT, I DID, ITS REAL.
qtube2000 5 months ago
@qtube2000 yes, if not santa will write you down in his bad boy book! (oops, wrong fairy tail) god sent down superman to save us all! YOU ARE ALL EVIL WHEN I FIND MY CAPSLOCK BUTTON! argh, im not crazy! doomsdaayyyy! its not fake, its just invisible, you cant see any diffrence and you have to give a little cash! IM SERIAL
oaaserud 3 months ago
Pretty much everything in this video is utter nonsense. The "scientific dead end" has lead to all modern technology including the computer you are using to read this comment.
If life was designed, the designer was pretty incompetent to include so many defects (our jaws are too small, our backs are bad, we have genetic diseases, etc etc). Also, every "irreducibly complex" system that ID proponents have put forward have been explained through evolutionary processes.
Nanofuture87 1 year ago
@Nanofuture87 have you heard of sin??????? ya its there.....and you believe that we just came about for no reason? and we see color why? why do we look alot like ppl from 1920? oh wait cuz we dont evolve,
wolfblade8426 2 months ago
@wolfblade8426 To answer your questions:
Have I heard of sin? Yes.
You believe that we just came about for no reason? If you mean that I believe that we weren't intentionally created, then yes.
We see color why? It's an evolutionary advantage to be able to easily distinguish similarly shaped objects, in our case fruit.
Why do we look a lot like people from 1920? There are actually a lot of reasons. Two of them are it's only been two generations and we have a global community.
Nanofuture87 2 months ago
look up aliens,religion, god and immortality.. you will find anwers or a brand new view of life and creation..
2hornz49 1 year ago
What a sad injustice this video is to Charles Darwin. It's crap like this that makes me want to just give up on humanity.
mercy35687 1 year ago
I love the way this guy doesen't understand the slightest bit what he's talking about.
"Led science down a dead end for 150 years."
Yea cos we've made no progress whatsoever since the Victorian age.
"The scientific evidence confirmed the truth of creation."
No it didn't, Darwin's theory is pretty widely excepted by any serious scientist/Bioligist.
And lastly the theory of evolution is not about coincidence or accident, to say it is portrays a fundamental lack of understanding.
MrEBassist 2 years ago
"Darwin's theory is pretty widely excepted by any serious scientist/Bioligist."
so is man-made global warming/climate change, and that turned out to be a hoax (climate gate). universal scientific concensus based on little to no fact or evidence is pure dogma.
jndillaha 2 years ago
"universal scientific concensus based on little to no fact or evidence is pure dogma."
That's true, and since evolution has lots and lots of evidence in various scientific fields independently verifying the predictions of Evolutionary Theory and is in fact an observed natural process, there's no way any educated person could justify calling it dogma.
theshredator 2 years ago
you sound like the global warming alarmists before climate-gate
jndillaha 2 years ago
you sound like the global warming alarmists before climate-gate
Well, thats interesting, because I never mentioned anything about global warming. ??
I guess when you hear something you disagree with, you write it off as global warming alarmist propaganda regardless of what subject is actually being discussed. You must be really smart, haha.
theshredator 2 years ago
apparently smarter than you as you cannot distinguish the correlation i made between global warming alarmists (how they turned out to be wrong and global warming is now confirmed not to be man-made) and evolutionists. your quote that i responded to, though pertaining to evolution, obviously, sounds very much like what the global warming alarmist say. thats why i said you sound like one. now that you have been educated, feel free to try again. but try to be coherent this time.
jndillaha 2 years ago
"apparently smarter than you as you cannot distinguish the correlation i made between global warming alarmists (how they turned out to be wrong and global warming is now confirmed not to be man-made) and evolutionists."
So if global warming turned out to be wrong and evolution has been thoroughly confirmed, how are they correlated again? Please educate me. Lol.
theshredator 2 years ago
i'll be happy to educate you further, apparently you are having a hard time with this. you said that evolution has been thoroughly confirmed (it has not and you cannot cite any evidence to prove it, but that is a different point altogether) which is exactly what the GW alarmist said about the climate before global warming was disproven. i was simply commenting on how similar you sound to them, and how ironic it is that evolution is not true either.
jndillaha 2 years ago
lol
theshredator 2 years ago
a rather witty and compelling, not to mention convincing, rebuttal...
jndillaha 2 years ago
ditto
theshredator 2 years ago
@jndillaha : Creation is right LOL: That is why 101 bible colleges out of 106 teach : Genesis is allegory . Even your most christian institutions don`t seem to believe in biblical creation.
lizazoon 1 year ago
@lizazoon This is the teaching of amillenial covenant theology which is based on an allegorical interpretation of Scripture as opposed to a literal one This is the dominant teaching in most theological seminaries and has been for decades. As an example, there are 106 schools in the Christian College Coalition. Of those 106 only 5 teach a literal interpretation of the Genesis account of creation or that the flood was global
lizazoon 1 year ago
@lizazoon
where did you get this information?
jndillaha 1 year ago
@jndillaha From a christian websie. Look it up.
lizazoon 1 year ago
@lizazoon
i assume you will refuse to give me the information. its easy to claim something, but to back it up is quite different. evolution is false, i heard it from a scientist. look it up.
jndillaha 1 year ago
Evolution is not random - natural selection is not random. it is the survival of the best fitted group of randomly different entities. The best properties get passed on during hundreds and hundreds of generations.
xxxxxrandom 2 years ago 2
biggest load of bollocks i've seen since the last load of bollocks i saw
adybeermonster 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
@adybeermonster Man can engineer molecules! It shows how it takes INTELLIGENCE in controlled laboratory conditions to mimic, manipulate, plagiarize a cell's Design! Scientists COPY genetic sequences!! They dont create anything!!
Its all Man made Synthetic chemistry! and it has nothing to do with the origin of life!! Homochirality is a disaster for any sort of naturalistic origins! There is no demonstrated source for such non-racemic mixture of sugars in any plausible pre-biotic environment!
5tonyvvvv 1 week ago
OMG. How could I have been so dumb, I now beleive, I mean, this argument is so irrefutable, Bollocks.
DARRBEV 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
@DARRBEV Man can engineer molecules! It shows how it takes INTELLIGENCE in controlled laboratory conditions to mimic, manipulate, plagiarize a cell's Design! Scientists COPY genetic sequences!! They dont create anything!!
Its all Man made Synthetic chemistry! and it has nothing to do with the origin of life!! Homochirality is a disaster for any sort of naturalistic origins! There is no demonstrated source for such non-racemic mixture of sugars in any plausible pre-biotic environment!
5tonyvvvv 1 week ago
wow, what a load of shit
Rib64 2 years ago 2
geez.....you need to wipe twice after dropping a load of crap that big.
kammueller 2 years ago 2
@ 02:40 "Dragged the scientific world to a dead end for the past 150 years!" Right, and we had men walking on the moon and computers before Darwin? That was so funny I just about pissed my pants! Little wonder the people who believe this shit end up freaking. it's things like this that make me believe that we are evolving into two seperate species. One will hold the future and the stars, and the other will be back on the plains of Africa, running from lions.
magick205 2 years ago
Has this video slipped through from a parallel universe? It doesn't appear to be based upon this reality.
Elephant53 2 years ago 3
This video is fail...on an epic scale.
hondadrvr3 3 years ago
Creationism is proof of the evolution of stupidity. Those who deny evolution need it most.
On the every clockmaker comment: if we were made by god, then what made god? God does not simplify our understanding of the universe. How is there an omnipotent being that controlls the universe? that is obviously much more complicated than just accepting that we dont know how the universe was created. Mankind is not able to wonder, we must have an answer for everything, and we will accept any answer
AmericanIdleNH 3 years ago
So, you're saying that the people who believe that monkeys transformed into people are the smart ones?
DarthMink 2 years ago
Evolution does not state that at all. Read up a bit on bevolution before you make such stupid comments.
Xeadne 2 years ago 3
Yes, it does. Unless "bevolution" is different from evolution. Evolutionist believe that men came from apes, it's sad but true.
DarthMink 2 years ago
We are smart, hairless apes. Get over it.
MonsterLopes 2 years ago
"Smart, hairless apes"? I'm not hairless or an ape but I am smart enough to realize that so you got 1 out of 3 right.
DarthMink 2 years ago
DarthMink
i just wanted to let you know evolution never states that we evolved from anything on the present day, cuz everything you see today are present day animals that evolved from previous animals. so to say that us evolutionist believe that we evolved from a modern day animal is just ignorant and stupid
fcdog555 2 years ago
fcdog555
Okay, I get it; you think animals that don't even exist transformed into people... that makes so much more sense.
DarthMink 2 years ago
so fossils are fake?
fcdog555 2 years ago
No, fossils are real but fossils of monkey men or whatever you wanna call them don't exist.
DarthMink 2 years ago
thats quite the ignorant statement, dont you agree? i mean you believe in fossils of other animals that show a distinct pattern of animals evolving but you are to ignorant to accept that people have found fossils of prehuman
fcdog555 2 years ago
No, I have never seen fossils that show "a distinct pattern of animals evolving" and neither have you because they don't exist. Scientist find small fragments then let their imaginations run wild with what they think they could be. The theory of evolution has never been proven through fossils or by any other means, that's why it's still a theory.
DarthMink 2 years ago
well im gunna try and find this video i watched recently that proves your statement about those fossils not existing, wrong.
and if you dont believe in evolution, thats your loss. but try in explain the new mutations of virus'? how is new variations of the flu not a process of evolution?
fcdog555 2 years ago
Trust me, no youtube video will convince me that the THEORY of evolution is true. It has never been proven, if it had then it wouldn't be called a theory. And about this "new variation of the flu" it's not actually new, it's been around for years and is likely man-made. Either way it's just a combination of porcine, avian and human flu strains. If you make kool-aide is that an example of water evolving?
DarthMink 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DarthMink
"if it had then it wouldn't be called a theory"
Watch the video called "Evolution Theory AND Fact" uploaded by a user called cdk007
maroom1 1 year ago
Amen brother
Hisson82 2 years ago
Fossils are timed by radioactive timing methods, set on a timeline and then can be seen how they change during tens and hundreds of thousands of years. Try visiting a museum of natural history sometime.
xxxxxrandom 2 years ago
this video is a bunch of crap.
WisdomVendor 3 years ago 2
This one is rather good :b It's funny how people act all ignorant on purpose, when they can't come up with any good arguments.
limberjack 3 years ago
Hmm the computer you are using is a product of evolution. If it's not real as you claim why are you using it?
DontBendOverForAllah 3 years ago
Clocks don't have sex.
tomaselvis 3 years ago 10
Are you sure?
There are some weird clocks made...
It would be right to say "clocks don't reproduce"
IamOutOfNames 3 years ago
@tomaselvis neither does RNA
5tonyvvvv 1 year ago
@tomas LOL..RNA has been copied using templates and bases..and without digital information and DNA..this RNA world is going no where..you also still have the major problem of Homochirality..Inserting bases into molecules is not creating anything..its copying..I see the media has brainwashed ? you..Please tell me the next step lets what you make next lets say you thousands of pairs of RNA..You have ZERO molecular machines..for assembly instructions...RNA molecules floating around is life?..LOL
5tonyvvvv 1 year ago
@5tonyvvvv
Hehe, lets do it like this. When I get sick I take medicine made by scientists and you can pray the sickness away. Deal?
tomaselvis 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@tomaselvis You make no sense Moron..you think pharmaceutical drugs cure people...LOL.. LOL..They are using Million dollar Synthesizing machines..to copy..to get it started..with just the right Temperatures..so the RNA wont get destroyed..yeah and all this happened on a primordial earth..you think I was born yesterday moron..lol
5tonyvvvv 1 year ago
@5tonyvvvv
You calling me names just prooves my point.
But do go ahead...
tomaselvis 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@tomaselvis spontaneously generation,and abiogenesis is impossible!!!..There is plenty about it..Venter himself starts with bases and templates, and Synthesizing equipment..you dont just put your chemicals in a test tube and it forms..LOL
5tonyvvvv 1 year ago
@tomaselvis They first used chemical precursors with a lot of phosphate. Then they used a process of drying and wetting to get the nucleotides to stick together. They artificially created short RNA molecules that were randomly sequenced. They didn't arise as self replicating entities with genuine genetic information by themselves, which is what it seems you would have us believe...with just right temperatures..then everything is carefully copied and transcription..is synthesized..
5tonyvvvv 1 year ago
Even with all the Proteins and DNA and RNA ...What would you do with it??..from there you have zero molecular machines, zero assembly instructions...all this stuff would just float away in some primordial soup and break down..and it would be the same thing in a test tube
5tonyvvvv 1 year ago
@tomaselvis . If evolutionists had optically pure DNA, RNA, and amino acids, and they still would have nothing. In fact, the energy needed to form the bonds to make the macromolecules necessary for a cell, will destroy any DNA, RNA, and amino acids that are outside of a cell.
5tonyvvvv 1 year ago
@5tonyvvvv
First of all, there are no "evolutionists". Evolution is a scientific theory.
And the second thing is that when talking about "creation" of life it's called abiogenesis NOT evolution.
So you're trying to convince me of your intelligent conclusions when you don't even get the name correct for the scientific field.
tomaselvis 1 year ago
@5tonyvvvv you do know DNA wasnt in the first life forms right? DNA evolved.. just because we dont know everything, doesnt mean its not right. learn about science DUUDE
oaaserud 3 months ago
@oaaserud Intelligence is needed to create software code or assemble a computer! FAR MORE intelligence is needed for the assemblance of the first Cell and thereby DNA. A DNA code is far more complex in design than All the Worlds Softwares COMBINED!! Therefore we can deduce Intelligent DESIGN! Homochirality and hydrolysis would prevent life from ever starting! It is chemically and mathematically impossible for a single protein to form by chance!
5tonyvvvv 3 months ago
@oaaserud You have been Indoctrinated to believe that! Lets see amino acids organize themselves?? Molecules can not order themselves! Learn Homochirality!!
5tonyvvvv 3 months ago
@oaaserud Homochirality is a disaster for naturalistic origins. All amino acids in proteins are 'LEFT-handed', while all sugars in DNA and RNA, and in the metabolic pathways, are 'RIGHT-handed'. Chirality!
A 50/50 mixture of left- and right-handed forms is called a racemate or racemic mixture!!. Which life can't use!! Its what we see in nature and in labs!
Life never came about by time chance natural processes! IMPOSSIBLE!!!
5tonyvvvv 3 months ago
@5tonyvvvv impossible as flying was.. becuase we dont know how, does not mean that some super being did it
oaaserud 3 months ago
@oaaserud Learn Homochirality, you have been Indoctrinated and brainwashed like most people!
5tonyvvvv 3 months ago
@5tonyvvvv one of the first sentences i read about it: "The origin of this phenomenon is not clearly understood". as i said, just because we dont know how everything happens, does not mean it some super magic.
oaaserud 3 months ago
@tomaselvis Intelligence is needed to create software code or assemble a computer! FAR MORE intelligence is needed for the assemblance of the first Cell and thereby DNA. A DNA code is far more complex in design than All the Worlds Softwares COMBINED!! Therefore we can deduce Intelligent DESIGN! Homochirality and hydrolysis would prevent life from ever starting! It is chemically and mathematically impossible for a single protein to form by chance!
5tonyvvvv 3 months ago
@5tonyvvvv Thank you! exactley! and also why wood there be color in the world? that isnt anything for survival! ahaha
wolfblade8426 2 months ago
@wolfblade8426 The moronic stubborn minded atheist refuses to understand Homochirality! Life by chance is IMPOSSIBLE!
5tonyvvvv 2 months ago
@wolfblade8426 Homochirality is a disaster for naturalistic origins. All amino acids in proteins are 'LEFT-handed', while all sugars in DNA and RNA, and in the metabolic pathways, are 'RIGHT-handed'. Chirality!
A 50/50 mixture of left- and right-handed forms is called a racemate or racemic mixture!!. Which life can't use!! Its what we see in nature and in labs!
Life never came about by time chance natural processes! IMPOSSIBLE!!!
5tonyvvvv 2 months ago
TheBigGameHunter Nice of you to misquote him as well, he denied the existance of any PERSONEL God.
mrlewington 3 years ago
"TheBigGameHunter Nice of you to misquote him as well, he denied the existance of any PERSONEL God. "
Nice of you not to reply to hide and make it look like i could not reply. good old xtian lies!
By that he was viewing the universe as a god, he did say no personal god. That did not mean an impersonal god!
TheBigGameHunter1 3 years ago
I can't believe this... this video doesn't even display a basic knowledge of the Big Bang theory. The Big Bang was not the origin of the universe, it was the major event that caused the universe to begin to expand and cool, as indicated by Einstein's discoveries.
Jeez, most of the people they talk to don't even understand natural selection. Anyone taken in by this video is absurdly ignorant.
federalD 3 years ago
LMAO, whoever put this video together obviously did not read Charles Darwin On the Origin of Species. Nowhere in any of his books does Darwin claim or imply that all living things were the result of coincidences. Hell, he/they didn't even read the first chapter. Darwin explains variation and evolution by natural selection as a cumulative process, not something that was just thrown together all at once by chance.
federalD 3 years ago
here we go again.. yawn...
ablytan 3 years ago
Iron is in our planet Earth and science shows that it came from outer space millions of years ago, plus iron as a substance is good for human body (check this verse revealed from our creator 14 centuries ago) , ALLAH said:
"...And We brought forth iron wherein is mighty power, as well as many benefits for mankind, that Allah may test who it is that will help Him (His religion), and His Messengers in the unseen. Verily, Allah is All-Strong, All-Mighty." QURAN(57:25)
saidpls 3 years ago
Ill give you some high velocity iron therapy if you want.
TheBigGameHunter1 3 years ago
Praise God the creator for all the creation. The cell, the body and all living things are all complex system working, more complex than we can ever imagine... Study the cell and you will become a christian lol :) People just don't want to see there is a God because they are afraid about their bad deeds, and want to continue living for themself..
Happy mother's day :)
FrankRC85 3 years ago 2
"Praise God the creator for all the creation."
Praise ignorant primative man the creator of gods
TheBigGameHunter1 3 years ago
If I claim to be smart, it means I'm not. Noone knows where we came from. So we could be an accident or we could be created. How can a man claim to be a scientist when he has only made a guess and calls it fact? A scientist must keep an open mind. The Atheist mind is closed. No Atheist can call their BELIEF science, but they do. Macro-evolution is a belief as is cosmic evolution. I only have an average IQ, but I implore you self proclaimed smart people to evolve to the next step...created!
mwwolf62 3 years ago
Nice to misquote Albert Einstein, he denied the existance of any god, as any smart person would.
TheBigGameHunter1 3 years ago
I wouldn't say that. There have been very smart people who were theists. Most of them were, however, at least skeptical of religion. Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Edison, for examples, I would say were intelligent men. In this day and age, however, there is no reason to deny the theory of evolution.
federalD 3 years ago
einstien denied religion, but not a God
ken060693 3 years ago
"Einstien denied religion, but not a God "
No he denied a god, and hated how lying religious people, took PART of his quote (Quote mine) and then didnt complete the next couple sentences which show he does not believe in a god.
TheBigGameHunter1 3 years ago
What a load of bollocks. Creationism is a joke. You're a joke if you believe in it. Message me back, and we'll have a good sit down and chat. I'm too disgusted right now to address this video in its entirety.
willywillywill 3 years ago
It's kind of good that the Atheistic Evolutionists Started down this path Specifically to exterminate God under the guise of science. As a forty six year old man that has been interested in God since I didn't believe my teacher that fosils could wait long enough to be covered over such a long period, it is now evident to me, Creationists are doing the science to disprove Macro-evolution 1 discovery and 1 phoney exibit at a time. They should have not staked their future on their religion,Atheism.
mwwolf62 3 years ago
Nice rant, but your wrong.
You and other fundamenatlists christinas are in the minority. Most christians accept The Theory of Evolution and the fact the earth is way older than 6000 years.
TheBigGameHunter1 3 years ago
Using long age dating e.g. Uranium to Lead or Carbon 14? According to recent findings, which do you think is more accurate?
cr4zyu 3 years ago
lol, If I were darwin and looked in the mirror, I would think we came from monkeys too!
mwwolf62 3 years ago
interesting how this movie leaves out that it was christians who developed the scientific method as mentioned in the story of gideon, muslims played little part in it, muslims, like atheists, are hijackers of christian science
kyleain 3 years ago
This video in stuffed with crapy lies and miss-information. Makes me sick, as a future scientist, and intelligent, moral human being.
nitramrot 3 years ago 2
Science and religion became separated because it was discovered that religion had no basis of belief except blind faith. Experiments, theories and proven facts make religion the primitive rubbish it is.
Lets face it, is Darwins theory any more fantastic than a big magician in the sky creating the earth in 6 days!
wordavee 3 years ago
what a load of crap. see a video called bongoman and you'll find all the answers you need to make up your mind about evolution. p.s the video is very short
acadiantunes 4 years ago
This video is crap,
most of the arguments used are philosophical questions not scientific.
Funny those points... in the "quote" from Gene Myers.
This is another quote from the same article:
"Of course one is free to believe that for any little piece of the detail, God did it...
From the viewpoint of science, we're surrounded by uncertainty, The parts we look at are the parts we don't understand . . . But the scientific belief is that in due course, an explanation will be found."
v46ln 4 years ago 3
Sigh... I get tired of these ignorant people. If I would be as ignorant as them; I, as a swede, will follow example and burn my physics book becuase it states that lightning is not the creation of Thor.
kratzek 4 years ago 3
"These incorrect ideas have dragged the scientific world into a scientific dead end for the past 150 years."
O.M.F.G!!! That is SO funny and ignorant at the same time I don't know if I'll die laughing or from depression.
Yeah...that stupid science hasn't given us ANY new knowledge this century. That's it, I'm signing up for religion!!!!
crashtaiwan 4 years ago 2
"These incorrect ideas have dragged the scientific world into a dead end of the past 150 years."
O.M.F.G!!! That is SO funny and ignorant at the same time I don't know if I'll die laughing or from depression.
Yeah...that stupid science hasn't given us ANY new knowledge this century. That's it, I'm signing up for religion!!!!
crashtaiwan 4 years ago
wow...this is bullshit
RealYungMoney 4 years ago 2
Followers of religion are threatened by science, why shouldn't they be? Flying horses and horned demons do not exist, the earth revolves around the sun, etc. Religions get weaker as time goes on. So the religious do what they do best: the attempt to adapt and modify things that are outside their sphere of "reasoning" and use it to their own means.
Science in the service of religion is not science.
Fudgeya 4 years ago 2
This video is total shit.
Creationismsucks 4 years ago 2
Why do religionists need to lie so much in order to make their points sound valid? Because they have no valid facts upon which to base there views, thereby making it neccesary to create "facts". The logical conclusion then is that the one side of the debate telling the most lies is the one that has no facts to back it up.
Mycos123 4 years ago 2
It never ceases to amaze me how religious fundementalists can both claim moral high-ground and still lie shamelessly, repeatedly, knowingly, and conm=nsistantly, over and over and over again as in this video, which tells one lie after another about the science of biology. --- Gary Williams. Biologist
Mycos123 4 years ago 2
top!
dezezin777 4 years ago
It seems you can go to Youtube to find plenty of Atheists. They have been very active in down rating all the anti-evolution videos without discussing the facts and evidence presented. They will not let go of their discredited religion that easy.
zigzagzoo12 4 years ago
If these are supposed to be the facts not discussed, the reason is obviopus...they are notr facts, and the process of explainiong why they aren't facts is something known as "education", and cannot be given in the few hunmdreds words allowed here. On the contrary, it allows creationists to lie shamelessly without worry of being exposed.
Mycos123 4 years ago
Just for amusement, I watch creationist videos up to the point when they tell the first major lie.
This one lasted one minute and seven seconds.
Darwin did not claim that life was explained by coincidence. Quite the contrary, he explained how natural selection will invariably drive populations toward better adaptation to their environment.
Educate yourself on a subject before you attack it.
majorvoltage 4 years ago
This must to be the most inaccurate historical video I have ever seen.
ThePhascolarctos 4 years ago
What a terrible video. It is utterly dishonest. It makes a mockery of religious morality.
artyfarty2 4 years ago
Artificial separation between religion and science?
In science every knowledge must be verified and confirmed with evidence. In religion we only have sacred books with unverifiable authorship.
johanssonx 4 years ago
i'd just like to say, that quote of Einstein on the info section isn't the full quote and misrepresents his views as such. the full quote is:
"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."
when questioned about his religion, einstein replied:
"I believe in Spinoza's God, who reveals Himself in the lawful harmony of the world, not in a God Who concerns Himself with the fate and the doings of mankind."
look up Spinoza on wikipedia.
IgWannA2 4 years ago
Materialist dogmas of ancient greece! I'm sure they had there share but they were also responsible for the birth of our modern idea of science, philosophy, psychology, astronomy and more! Aristotle, Plato, Pythagoras, Socrates etc etc. Sorry 2:46 was as far as I got...
truthchannel 4 years ago
I love how they use the term "materialist" to insult anyone who doesn't believe in God and actually wants reason and evidence to prove things. You're a "materialist" if you actually think outside the box and don't use faith as a copout. Morons.
Whoo69 4 years ago
This is bullshit. You can't prove or disprove God so just give it up. We should all be agnostics. Trying to prove God through the complexity of the universe proves nothing. Just because the world is complex does not necessarily mean someone had to have created it. There's no, as of yet, discovered scientific law for this.
Whoo69 4 years ago
wow i have never seen a video with one star before
wanderingsociologist 4 years ago
Scientific Concept = god did it..........LOL
mossyslopes 4 years ago
As a curiosity this is interesting in parts but still essentially an argument to justify organised religion.
hashmcgandy 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I love atheists. They are so stupid.
bodwisa 4 years ago
how so?
riffage 4 years ago
Crap like this explains our past. Once christians came to power, most other knowledge was quashed. It wasnt until the exchange of goods and ideas from the orient broke us out of it. Then the printing press made copies of the Bible available, and people started to reason again. Oversimplified, but hey, I only get 300 characters.
lijebaley01 4 years ago
This video is PURE UNADULTERED GARBAGE!
robertangel30 4 years ago 4
5They are from the world and therefore speak from the viewpoint of the world, and the world listens to them. 6We are from God, and whoever knows God listens to us; but whoever is not from God does not listen to us. This is how we recognize the Spirit[a] of truth and the spirit of falsehood.
hannahr77 4 years ago
sorry dude, PROPAGANDA
riffage 4 years ago
It's funny how atheists prefer the Koran to the Bible. These people are so full of crap.
bodwisa 4 years ago
bod
Yes it's funny how atheists prefer the Qur'an but JESUS did say it would happen so nothing new here it only shows that the Bible is of GOD
hannahr77 4 years ago
search for this video Holy Bible, Koran, Book of Mormons are Fiction. and look at the guys other videos, his a very intelligent guy who saw the light as a kid and turned his back on it as an adult, he's called FightingAtheist.
riffage 4 years ago
but there has always been a judas element in the church that didnt break of to form other churches. galileo was treated unfairly but the church never assumed an absurd position. galileo even has church appointed servants and was held in the apartment overlooking the vatican gardens, then was off to a country side manner. the hiroshima bomb proves the existence of god and the catholic church. since the 8 jesuits 1 km from epicenter were unhurt l. even
damiantvz 4 years ago
DOD us military has this classified and they wonder if an atomic bomb could even damage a holy place like vatican city or fatima ect.. much liker the destroyer passed over the homes with lambs blood. the enemy is spiritual not of flesh and blood. or gun or knife or bomb.
damiantvz 4 years ago
ok first of all, alot of people survived hiroshima. even if that is true about the jesuits, they dont tell you about any other jesuits, priest etc. that were hurt. and as for the destroyer, well the fact is that the exodus as it is written never happened.
riffage 4 years ago
galileo was a roman catholic, was friends with the cardinal who became pope. had children out of wedlock. and tried to use his science to have the church reinterpret scripture, but did admit that bible was infallible and was treated fair by the church. his best work was done his inquisition. and they never dasid he was wrong just he couldnt prove it. and even jesuits saw some of the flaws in his arguments.
damiantvz 4 years ago
PS. thanks so much for reading! listen to Black Sabbath! :)
riffage 4 years ago
this video is designed to malitiously confuse you and make you take sides on the matter without telling you any true facts! ASK QUESTIONS! DO NOT FOLLOW BLINDLY LIKE SHEEP TO AN EVIL SHEPARD! ATHEISM IS THE FUTURE! If you are fearful of hell then i suggest you go to this site; godvsthebible (dot com) look for chap.13 on the origin of hell, it will be a huge weight off your shoulders!
riffage 4 years ago
rif
24 "And they will go out and look upon the dead bodies of those who rebelled against (GOD) me; their worm will not die, nor will their fire be quenched, and they will be loathsome to all mankind."
hannahr77 4 years ago
wow! A truly benevolent God!
haarez 4 years ago
haarez
glad you think so, you do know that HE loves you and did in fact died so you when you accept as SAVIOUR and LORD can go to heaven, pretty awesome
hannahr77 4 years ago
:-) I'm glad that you are the last in the West that still so fanatically believe such BS.
haarez 4 years ago
nice one haarez! :)
riffage 4 years ago
"INTELLIGENT DESIGN" IS RELIGION NOT SCIENCE! THE EVIDENCE DOES NOT POINT TOWARDS DESIGN, SCIENCE HAS SIMPLY NOT DISPROVEN IT YET! someday it will but the creationists will still the arguing in vain.
Do not be afraid to ask questions, it is the only proven way to make progress. It is the only thing that sets humans apart from all other animals. Religion discourages questions and so halts progress. If we were all truly faithful then no progress would have been made for the last 300 years.
riffage 4 years ago
how come Newton is ok to believe but not Galileo or Darwin? the answer; Newton does not contradict the Bible, Galileo and Darwin do. Dont believe them when they say science is influenced by "material philosophy" science is based on experimentation and evidence and not faith or philosophy. just because science cannot answer all the questions doesnt mean that religion can.
riffage 4 years ago
did you notice that they didnt explain how science "proved" creation? did you notice that they didnt explain how it "debunked" evolution? well the fact is it NEVER PROVED CREATION, IT DID PROVE EVOLUTION! if it wasnt for the religious right the theory of evolution would be called the law of evolution by now. dont believe those who say there is no proof in fossils, etc. they simply ignore and slander the evidence.
riffage 4 years ago
more missinformation! this video is pretty disgusting to me! how can religion call itself true when it has no proof? how can it call evolution false when there is evidence? did you notice that the first few lines insisted that what it says is false must be false...without any reason or proof? why is it that religion decides what parts of science it likes and which parts it rejects based on which parts agree with their fundimental and UNPROVEN "truths"?......
riffage 4 years ago
rif
Do you know just how many lies the science has been telling ppl? And what abt the money they get it's a huge sum
hannahr77 4 years ago
science doesnt lie, science is about the discovery of truth. religion is about unquestioning, ignorant blind faith. which do u think is more reliable?
and dont give me quotes written by opium addicts over 2000 years ago. they were just pissed off because they were under roman occupation.
riffage 4 years ago
rif
thank you I take GOD and the bible anytime and mind Darwin died believing that he was wrong very wrong and nobody is talking abt this
hannahr77 4 years ago
well that isnt true either and even if it was it doesnt make his theory untrue. just because he might regret it doesnt mean he didnt have the right idea.
riffage 4 years ago
check this out; evolutionvscreationism. com
riffage 4 years ago
Superb! Thanks for this extraordinary movie!
TOM1GER 4 years ago
EVolution is the ultimate dragon for the Creationists to slay. However they will fight over each other to discount different bits of it. Common descent is rebutted by HOVIND with 'did your grandpa look like a monkey' Dr. Behe concedes it in his own Darwin's Black Box, writing: "I find the idea of common descent (that all organisms share a common ancestor) fairly convincing, and have no particular reason to doubt it" (op. cit., p. 5).
edwaltthespisactor 4 years ago
I fully endorse all pedophile worshippers openly show contempt for evolution. evolution is already a reality, the theory itself is used in dozens of industries to create billions of dollars in profits. continue reading ur hatefilled book spawned by the pedophile mohammed.
MohammedIsPedophile 4 years ago
Another nausiating example of the god-suckers selling their propaganda based on - as usual no evidence or proof whatsoever.
An9ila 4 years ago
the philosophy of materialism? What about Capitalism and consumerism which we thrive in? isn't that materialistic philosophy? You point finger at athiest for not believing in God, but it's ok to live in a materialistic and consumer society! Forget about Dawkins folks, there's a bigger fish to fry and that is Capitalism and consumerism....it will be the demise of Democracy!!
GnosisMan50 4 years ago
10 minutes of statement after statement and not one interesting point. Laughable from a scientific point of view - If you havn't watched this yet, dont watch it unless you fancy a good laugh. As far as presentations of arguments for the god hypothesis go - this is unbelievably poor.
Jonnybd1 4 years ago
The video talks about how science and religion were in hermony before the 18th century. What about Galileo who was banished because he believed the sun was the center of our solar system, and the church said we were.
coyork15 4 years ago
What about when mathematicians were executed for "making a pact with the devil?"
Or when anti-biotics were criticized for being blasphemous?
Coyork15 is right, science and religion were not in harmony.
jogiff 4 years ago
What a laughable video!
lurconis666 4 years ago
also- why doesn't the video explain what they mean by "materialist theories"?
and what does darwinism have to do with it?
and please quit using ad populum arguments.
and please quit appealing to common sense to direct yourself(ves) to truth. Empirical evidence and reasoning quite often go against what is considered "common sense".
robakerson 4 years ago
why are you trying to confirm/deny evolution based on human size?
If we evolve to be shorter, it is because shorter is more adaptable to the environment in which we live. "taller" is not a universal "better". Whether we grow shorter or taller over time depends on our environment.
robakerson 4 years ago
RevoJam, I find qiute disappointing, your bizzarre explanation that Americans are getting shorter "because of the advent of cars!!!So that is evolution, isn't it?"
After conceding that there are a lot of gaps in the theory of evolution, it is evident, from your own hypothesis, that there WILL continue to be even MORE gaps in the theory for some light years to come.
PS: I did enjoy your video on economic growth, though.
adinotheeznite7 4 years ago
Darwin rejected this "truth" in his book....
love a non-biased documentary.
RevolutionaryJam 4 years ago
'sigh' this is pointless really you have your beliefs and I have mine. though I just find it easier to believe we were created instead of believing I'm related to an ape/monkey/etc/.
DocsHalon 4 years ago
Hi Doc,
I think you find it more 'accepetable' to be the result of devine creation.
But that's ok, you can believe anything you want, and so you do ;)
Cheers m8.
mindwis3 4 years ago
oooh the argument of wonder "things in life are amazing, therefore a god had to make things"...this argument is circular because it assumes its conclusion.
deloreanflux88 4 years ago
Whahhahahahhaha
they are ACTUALLY qouting Behe
builderB 4 years ago
This is one fat lie and distortion. You are twisted and are trying to twist others. Evolution is a fact - 100% fact and there is nothing you or anyone can do to disprove that fact. The THEORY is the explanation of the mechanism of evolution.
colbuckshot 4 years ago
to be fair there are a lot of gaps in the theory of evolution, but hey, look at the last FEW THOUSAND YEARS of evolution, we're taller and smarter,
evolution is certainly at work.
RevolutionaryJam 4 years ago
Hehe except for the U.S. We shrinking in size lol!
:*( its funny but its not....
Techrubbish 4 years ago
RevoJam, According to recent findings published in the Social Science Journal(06/2007), AMERICANS ARE GETTING SHORTER.
The study, conducted by the University of Munich and Princeton University,