Nuclear Power Plant Demolished

[thespaceboon101]

can anyone find the video with the power plants with the cute faces

[carsandsports123]

who else is looking for nuclear plants with faces?

[isaacsvideo]

this isn't what i wanted, i wanted tiny faces

[shinokiba]

Yet again we let dumb asses make our decisions.

[urdandman313]

Nice shot of the cooling towers being demolished.

[oldfart387]

Even Reuters announcers are boring.

[CannibusSuperbus]

@oldfart387 They need the Spanish soccer announcers haha.

[FPSage]

But it will blow up the hole city :O

[Daimo988]

@FPSage you seriously think a nuclear plant is demolished still containing nuclear material.......wow (bit thick)

[codyboy1996]

yeah dye mother fucher stop polluting

[codyboy1996]

@xMKIVxVR6x my power im geting is not nuclear power its water thig pond )) i thinq but nuclear power produs polution

[XD1243]

@codyboy1996 you do realize that nuclear power plants give off no pollution... they do not create any green house gases. The only thing they emit is an extremely small amount of nuclear waste which is disposed of safely. The smoke that comes out of the cooling towers is only pure steam, no pollutants. And these facilities are very safe as they have concrete walls surrounding the reactors that prevent nuclear leaks and several fail safe systems.

[scottydog137]

@XD1243

Try telling that to the Fukushima 50

Nuclear plants aren't infallible

God bless thir souls!!

[themacg33k]

@scottydog137 They're not infallible, but they're incredibly safe. Fukushima would have been fine had there been no earthquake. And in the US, no one has died from nuclear power. (Over 300 people have died from wind turbines (e.g., falling off towers), though.)

[22ness0hayden]

@XD1243 I think you'll find he's right. This plant has been a well known polluter in the past. The Irish sea polluted from various leaks over the years. They changed the name to try and leave all that bad history behind.

[counterjihadistswin]

50 Megawatts... Isn't that ridiculous to let an nuclear reactor run critical for a lousy 50 Megawatts?! When you consider how old this plant was, and how dangerous (compare Sellafield!) Hell, I can produce 50 Megawatts with a windmill in my Backyard!!!

[Thursdayuk]

@counterjihadistswin haha no you cant!

[Allante715]

@counterjihadistswin

50MW from a windmill. Yea, I`m the Queen of England.

[mrKickass808]

lol the people are just standing there

[captinseperoth]

@mrKickass808 impratical

you can take all of the land,of a small state to power a city like NYC,vs a small atomic power plant.

and solar is HIGHLY UNRELIABLE.

also, atomic power-plants is completely safe. and no one has died from atomic energy,that was generated through responsible means.

Chernobyl was a fucking joke of the way they built the facilities and the staff they hired to run it.

and you can get more radiation from the dentist then what was leaked from "3 miles"

[PantheraAtrox]

Britain is smarter than we are getting rid of these things which is like a real trojan horse in a long run.

We need to find a safe way to create power and not bury radioactive "Pandora's boxes" inside our earth. Leaks will eventually occur.

[Inoppis]

@PantheraAtrox

Luckily they are building 10 new stations by 2020 to cover these old ones.

[captinseperoth]

@PantheraAtrox

wheres that, "hoo haa" mentality that brought mankind to the surfaces of the moon? It seams like it has been replace with the defeatist mentality!

why do we have to bury it?!

we can simply sink the caskets, at the points of the oceans where the crustal subduction zones are! Doing so,the the waste will be absorbed over time into the earth it's self!

or better yet, fast breeder reactors!

[PantheraAtrox]

@captinseperoth ,Because of water-erosion, the waste containers leaked in the Baltic sea after 10 years making it and all within radioactive in those areas and spreading.

Why add more fuel to the fire?

No nukes.

[captinseperoth]

@PantheraAtrox

im talking about in the middle of the oceans, at very deep depths.

or how about replacing all of 30-40 year old atomic facilites in america ,with plants that consume waste as fuel....?

sooner or later you will need to replace those facilities,why not with more efficient and safer facilities on the same land?

don't ever replace those old facilitates with coal plants that produce radioactive fly ash!

[PantheraAtrox]

@captinseperoth, Agree regarding coal plants, not a good thing.

But why not go solar instead?

[captinseperoth]

@PantheraAtrox unreliable

and atomic energy is extremely safe these days.

the waste that we bury has still 70-80 percent of it's potential energy still left,that we could reprocesses and use up again.

yet it's cheaper at the moment to just use new fuel,rather reprocessing.

also look up breeder reactors, and thorium.

[ethanswish123]

This is sad

[Phazz3d0ut]

We should do that to ours in America when the 4th Generation Plants come out so we can have cleaner energy with less radiation as a byproduct.

[captinseperoth]

@Phazz3d0ut

that will never happen with all the environmentalist lobbyist

[KAAAZAMMM]

cool

[simonstrom15]

yeah

[izkormvach]

Impressive