I dont know why we want to go to the moon anyway. Its just a ball of dirt. Why? So we can say America owns the moon so we can build condo's. LEAVE IT ALONE. YOU MIGHT THROW US OFF TRACK, and we go flying thru space into a "white" hole. PEACE!
NO SHIT we didn't land on the moon, the reason is because there are "radiation fields" in space, that is why the russians only sent remote robot machines. In order for a ship to protect a human from going through radiation fields the ship would have to be made of MASSIVE EXTREMELY THICK LED WALLS, too heavy to ever lift off into space.
@AThomasKent Aren't wars incredibly costly also?And difficult?And yet we still continue to fight wars.Constantly,one after another.Would this money be better spent investing in our space programs and researching the universe?
The reason we don't go back is because the transformers are still there. NO DUH! No, I'm kidding, the real reason? THERE'S NOTHING LEFT TO SEE! A bunch of rocks here, a bunch of craters there. Really come on! Plus, the moon landings cost a LOT! If we keep on going, we'll go broke! For now, there's not going to be any manned spacecrafts to any place. It will take a long long time before we go back to the moon, or mars, or Europa or any other planets
Because it's made of cheese... ? Hmmm is my laptop actually faster than the one one the moon rover? Lol, why don't we go to the moon? Maybe the spacecraft's gas is too expensive?
its bullshit ..... get in a 40 year old car and see how shit it is. 40 year old tech is fucking crap, no way these fuckers went there and got it all right first time no accidents.
That is a very good question.I do think they went to the moon for real.But they've seen something there that we are not supposed to know about and "that" something is preventing us going back there.Nothing to do with computers or how expensive it is.Its something totally different.But thats just what i think,i might be wrong.
@mulgeroinen Well,we've been down to the ocean and we still keep on diving,even though we got the general idea about what's down there.There is no way we know about the moon at least 10% of what we know about the ocean.And since it's been done,pretty easily i might add,with an old technology(no accidents and nothing went wrong),why not do it using a new technology that we have at our disposal now?Should be a piece of cake?
@Astrophysicsist how do you know? were you one of the people that landed? or are you just saying this because you read or saw pictures on books/magazines that claimed it was the moon?
Because, dearest Filipino, us Asians are not supposed to drive spaceships. Look at Star Trek. What do you think the REAL reason they kept getting into all those situations was?
Because there is no good reason to go back, no single nation has the money to send a manned mission there and nations are more worried about the current economic climate than space exploration.
Also computer power has little to do with sending a manned mission to the moon.
Look how smog LIAR and heritic LIAR, and ROB LIAR, and StMusr LIAR, Bogdog LIAR Bogdapollo, the list continues, lie infitesimally. Its weird how ALL, no really, ALL the fake ML truth is constantly bombarded with ML conspiracy aids butt pirates. WHO would go back to same videos over and over and over? And check there pages, all about the ML conspiracy. They get paid, it's that simple, it IS a LIE of SATANIC proportions. God Bless
Look how smog LIAR and heritic LIAR, lie infitesimally. Its weird how ALL, no really, ALL the fake ML truth is constantly bombarded with ML conspiracy aids butt pirates. WHO would go back to same videos over and over and over? And check there pages, all about the ML conspiracy. They get paid, it's that simple, it IS a LIE of SATANIC proportions. God Bless
- How hard would it be to ignore Sibrel and other hoax believers? I don't know. You think Sibrel would say "Wow, if they actually swore on a bible, then maybe Apollo really did happen after all!"?
How hard would it be to ignore the harassing of astronauts and slandering and libeling people having worked on the Apollo program?
How hard would it be to ignore an idiot asking you to swear on a bible that you really love your mother?
Imagine if you had spent your life test flying planes, and riding the business end of an ICBM into space, and then 40 years later be ambushed in your home, on the street or in a hotel lobby, having your integrity questioned by the likes of Bart Sibrel asking you to swear on a bible that you have really risked your ass going to the moon. I think that is an absolute insult.
@TheHeretic2011 Any devoted religious induvidual would be EXTREMELY offended by a cab driver nobody waving a bible around pretending to have religious authority, let alone credibility. Minister authority takes years with extreme dedication to a lifestyle. That Sibrel assumes he can just yell "I HAVE A BIBLE" and expect equal respect is naive ego-mongering in the extreme. Such disrespect should never be rewarded.
Why didnt Sibrel bring a REAL pastor to give the oath?
@smogmontser Thanks for the pointer, I'll check that out. Although, Aldrin won't swear on a bible that he did land on the moon. Guess he believes in God.
@TheHeretic2011 Any idiot can ask "a question." But ONLY an idiot would then refuse to listen to the answer as it didnt coddle his pre-conceived bias. The "Hoax" movement has nothing to do with fact and everything to do with refusing to admit they're wrong, even in the face of overwhelming evidence that the landings were real.
@smogmontser Ever wonder why people just believe what they're told and never question? I'd rather ask and be laughed at than just believe what I'm told.
Ever wonder why some people respond with hostility to a simple question?
You do know the lower layer of the Moon's regolith is much more dense than the thin layer made up of vaporized particles right? The moon is a meteor itself, the only thing that can make those craters and that dust, is another meteor.
@Rob260259 Yes, I see the dust moving in the vid of the landing, but the pic's of the LM on the moon do not show any dust having been displaced. In fact it looks undisturbed.
@Rob260259 The dust was loose enough to print deeply when walked on, yet packed enough to remain in place under a similar pressure of rocket exhaust. Yea, that sounds right.
Given that the descent stage engine bell is about 5 ft across at the bottom, and that thrust of the engine at touchdown was about 3,000 pounds, that blast pressure of the rocket exhaust was only about 1 pound per square inch. Which is not much different from the pressure caused by the weight of an astronaut on the moon standing on one foot while walking across the surface.
@TheHeretic2011 If you're stupid enough to accept a *webpage* of all things as "proof" of your high IQ, then thats proof positive you are, in fact, an idiot ;)
Yup. I don't wonder anymore why these people don't show up there. It's only because they prefer to stay in this cozy little walled garden at Youtube.
I think you and I know what would happen if they ever had to defend their silly theories in a mainstream forum against people who actually DO know what they're talking about.
What's very weird is that hoax nuts claim anyone with an understanding of science could easily see through NASA's lies. Yet they still haven't produced any vaguely plausible reason as to why scientists the * whole world over* fail to see what is incredibly obvious. That is VERY odd... Are they all mind controlled? Is the miniscule band of hoax heads the only ones who can see the 'twoof'? Why can't they come up with any coherent reason for this?
we never went there in the first place, the russians wont even try couse they know its not possible!!! there far more advanced than uk or usa....REMEMBER THEY WERE FIRST TO PUT A MAN INTO SPACE!!! COME ON USA WAKE UP...WHERES THE PROOF THEY LANDED?? APART FROM A SHITE VIDEO THATS BE DOCTURED BADLY...WHERES THE STUFF LEFT BEHIND??? RIGHT!!!! MAN OH MAN
@zakstone123 Err, why dont you ASK the russians why they didnt go? Do you have a quote of them saying "We didnt go cause its impossible and no one else can either?" Cause if you do I want that linked right here and right now. They never said it.
30 sec of googling would have told you they didnt go cause their booster rockets F'ed up and they ran out of money. Way to go einstein ;)
For all hoax nuts: the whole program of Apollo and the magnitude was impossible to fake. There were several countries involved in tracking the missions, hundreds of peer reviewed papers on the rocks have been written by geologists worldwide. thousands of engineers had to be involved, thousands of pictures and hundreds of hours of film and video were made, UV pictures were made, Lunar reflectors were left there, satellites were launched from SIM bays, et cetera et cetera...
its because theres fuckall there. testing has been done and there is absolute zero chance of sustaining life forms on the moon. therefore its a waste of resources just to go there and walk around plant a flag and go home, space programs would rather invest their time into finding a planet we can travel to and from and harvest resources. with the future of our world eventually coming to an end it would make sense to (START) Working on how to get the fuck off.
@TheEducatedtroll THERES FUCKALL THERE YOUR ABSOLUTLY 100% CORRECT...NO MOONBUGGY, NO FLAG NO FUCK ALL...IF YOU BELIEVE USA GOVT THEN THE NEXT TIME YOU SEE ELVIS IN KAYMART BUY HIM A BURGER BABY!!! DONT YA JUST LOVE YOUTUBE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If humanity wants to go 'BACK' to the Moon like in the Apollo (sic) landings then for fcuk's sake take the fluoride out of the water & replace it with MDMA Crack Heroin Grass & even a little LSD for the emotionally stable adults involved in serial butt-sex from the minds of the Gollywood elite & then 'FCUK' the technology because we can fly there in our dreams...
In the meantime salute the flag & vote Republican or Democrat & stop asking yourselves why the hell big-dicks need to lie to us-all...
Why go back and do the same thing again? It's extremely dangerous and expensive! Everything we learned, the Soviets/Russians now know. The only possibly compelling reason to return to the moon would be for long-duration missions to mine Helium 3 or do astronomy. Long-duration on the moon is exponentially more difficult, dangerous and expensive. Have you read about the economy recently? And there is no Cold War to drive anyone's nationalism.
You don't know much, do you? There are thousands of pictures and many hours of footage. There are six ft intact core tubes and many rocks examined by geologists worldwide, even today. There were sixty experiments on the Moon and their results have been analysed by hundreds of universities and international institutions.
You must be one of those self absorbed fools that thinks he can outsmart scientists.
@Rob260259 Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Landing on the moon is an extraordinary claim. Examine the photos and film. They're full of little mistakes. NASA does not allow ANYONE outside the agency to examine their rocks, and recently SWAT teamed an old lady who had a tiny piece,given to her husband by Neil Armstrong years ago.Google it.
Yea, I suppose they did land on the moon, I mean, the gov has never lied before, HAVE THEY?
Yes, landing on the Moon was extraordinary. That's why they are taught in most academic institutions worldwide. The samples have been studied around the world and verified to be non-terrestrial. The massive amount of scientific data returned has spawned hundreds of peer reviewed scientific studies and is still studied today. Impossible to fake that amount of evidence for so long. It is the most documented human achievement ever.
How to fake these hours of video and thousands of pictures? How to fake real time tracking telemetry, how to keep all these people silent? How to fake 60 scientific experiments left on the surface and the data received from them? How to fool the thousands of scientists? How to fake 840 pounds of rocks and 6 foot long intact core tube samples brought back? How to fake satellites launched from SIM bays into lunar orbit?
@Rob260259 We have landed probes on the moon, we just haven't landed people there. Probes have no problems with the Van Allen belts. Federal funding and non-disclosure agreements go a long way. Much of the pics and video has been discredited, enough that it would be easy to prove fraud in a court of law.(I admit that's not saying much.) I grew up during the Apollo program, it broke my heart when I learned it was fake.
The Van Allen Radiation Belts do indeed contain enough radiation to kill a man, if he stayed there long enough. While passing through, Apollo was exposed to an average radiation dose of 0.167 mSv per second. Thirty straight days of that dose would have killed the astronauts. But Apollo passed through the VABs in less than an hour and a half.
How did you 'learn' Apollo & the Moon landings were 'faked'..?
1) Moonrocks out of NASAs control for 40 years. Not a single foreign geologist has ever called them fake
2) Japans LRO satellite, out of NASAs control, took pics the LEMs left behind and released the pics worldwide
3) Video of moondust shows it moving in perfect parabolic arcs, impossible in any atmosphere
4) After 40 years, your ONLY refute of the astroanuts alibi is "liar liar pants on fire." If 40 years isnt enough time, WTF do you need? Honest to christ
No blast crater under the LM, even though its loose dust.
Shine from support wires used to simulate lower gravity.
Multiple shadows from multiple light sources.
Apollo astronaut missing right foot.
Reflection of man in T-shirt in visor.
Same mountain.in different sizes in different pics. You can find several of them right here on YT. Search and view with an open mind.You gotta admit something ain't right. Oh yea, spacesuit won't fit through LM door.
Wow... I noticed you got your answers. Anyway; you really think NASA was stupid enough to forget to put a crater under the LM? Stupid enough to move the LM off the set and take a second picture with it missing? Stupid enough to allow a flag to wave in the breeze? To use multiple lighting sources? To release all that so that every high school drop out could see the fakery?
@Rob260259Nasa never figured on people being able to analyze the footage. They would only see it on TV once. I realize I'm not the smartest person on the planet,(my IQ is only174),but you people will believe anything . I guess common sense isn't so common.
I think the vast majority of people who care know it's a fraud. I you're not smart enough to figger that out, well, who cares.
My mother said never to argue with idiots, the people watching may not be able to tell the difference.
@Rob260259 OK, you've totally convinced me. I now believe in the moonlanding because I've seen pictures. I also believe in bigfoot because I've seen pics of him as well. And the Loch Ness monster. And the Grey Man. And everything else that anyone with two braincells firing in unison wouldn't believe in. I've been totally convinced by your pathetic attempts at logic and namecalling. Now, I have better things to do with my life than argue with an idiot, so bye.
@TheHeretic2011 "namecalling" is perfectly legitimate if your sole evidence is "well it looks fake to me." LOL I had no idea your analysis was quite so professional ;)
WE have objective measures:
1) Moonrocks examined by foreign geologists, out of NASAs control (which you didnt know and had to be told about, BY US)
2) Japans Pics (And I'm sorry, but "looks fake to me" is piss poor evidence, try again Mr 174)
@SpreadingtheMuse II'm sure you've seen the pictures and video of bigfoot. Not to mention the plaster casts of his prints. I believe some claim to have bits of his fur. Sooo, you believe in bigfoot? You must since theres as much evidence of him as there is in the moonlanding. And learn to spell.
Tell us; are you into Opus Dei, JFK, Martin Luther King, Illuminati, Freemasons, Templar Knights, Nibiru, New World Order, 9/11 IJ, Electromagnetic Mind Control, chemtrails and HAARP, too?
@Rob260259 I admit I looked into JFK, but who hasn't.
Look, I realize you have nothing better to do than hang on YT all day, so I'll throw you a bone. Search Disney moonlanding here on YT. I know, I know, it's not evidence unless it supports your position, but hey, give it a look anyway.
I do have better things to do. I'm going deer hunting. If I see bigfoot, I'll tell him you said hi.
Thank you for confirmation that you have NO knowledge about this. Just like you have NO education in this field. You're unable to answer simple questions and only saying "fake" because it's beyond your comprehension and because you don't understand it. Very confirming indeed. You failed. So unless you have any other bright words of wisdom, have a nice day.
@Rob260259 I went and checked out your channel. Looks like you've got a lot of vids on this. Are you receiving a YT dividend check? If so,it seems you have a financial reason for your opinions. Afraid you're going to loose money if people stop believing?
@Rob260259 How about this. BBC news "Fake Dutch moon rock revealed". The Dutch believed it was real for forty years, but when they tested it........Well? It turned out to be petrified wood. Would you have us believe they brought wood back from the moon?
" ..a few faked pictures and some rocks no one is allowed to examine.."
Your words.
So there are petrochemists who do examine rocks? Well, sorry to disappoint you, the huge piece of petrified wood that was researched by Wim van Westrenen had nothing to do with NASA. Former PM Drees got it from the US Ambassador.
You actually believe NASA would have directed giving one of their 48 pristine moon rocks to a retired 87 year old statesman?
@Rob260259 OK,only 11 countries recieved samples they could analyze. They were also countries that recieved foreign aid. All others recieved samples(goodwill rock) sealed in lucite. But lets say the samples are real. The Russians retreived moon rocks and dust too. They didn't have to land people there to do it. Turns out they used a mechanism similar to the old mechanical banks. No real robotics required. So, possesion of rocks is not proof of people. I'm enjoying this, so please don't insult me
The Soviet Luna 16/20/24 returned 100/55/170 gram of soil. With a lot of trouble, but they succeeded. Have you got any clue how many probes it would take to return 800+ pounds of dust and rocks from the Moon? I guess not.
Yes, the Soviets had a few samples, too. And had a nice chance to compare them with their own. Guess what...?
These were the non-American institues receiving samples for examiniation and research: University Cambridge, England, Queen Mary College, London, England, University of Durham, England, Geologic Survey, Canada, Australian Nat'l University, Canberra, Univ. Manchester, Manchester, England, University Berne, Switzerland, Univ. Cologne, Germany, Max Planke Inst., Fur Chemie, Mainz, Germany. Want some more, for your pleasure?
In an earlier post you said "too big to fake". The Manhatten project employed 130,000 people and spent 2 billion dollars (24 bil todays money) and was kept secret. The Air Force had it's own space program. They claim 5 times the launches as NASA's program, yet no one knew.
The Manhattan Project NEVER WAS 'kept secret': At the Pottsdam conference in 1945, Truman told Stalin, thinking it would be a revelation, that the US had it, Stalin replied "yes, but you only have two". The Soviets had at least one spy inside Los Alamos, and were able to steal enough of what they could not figure out for themselves to make a copy of Fat Man. What was kept secret was that the first Soviet A-bomb was basically a copy of Fat Man. For a few years..
Yes, the Soviets knew a lot about Apollo. The Soviet DSN had a very capable STC, monitoring most of the telemetry. The Soviet SIGINT at Lourdes, Cuba, watched and monitored ALL launches, in fact.
- So you actually think NASA was stupid enough to release the picture with the reflection of a man in a T-shirt, so that every high school drop out could see the fakery?
"My IQ is 174" and is that jsut another dumb thing we're supposed to believe without evidence? ;)
Bear in mind, there's more proof for a moonlanding than there is of your IQ being over 100. Your sole evidence of "cause I say so" is naive in the extreme and you know it.
There is zero proof of fake. There is no evidence that hasnt been refuted already at sometime someplace. Easy challenge, name ANY evidence of "fake" thats never been refuted at any time. Go right ahead
@Rob260259 Yes they really were THAT STUPID...THANKS TO TODAYS SOFTWARE ITS EASY TO PROVE THE LYING BASTARDS FAKED IT ALL... KENNADY, 911 , VIETNAM FALSE FLAG WAR, 58.OOO USA TROOPS KILLED, IRAQ ETC ETC ETC...MAN OH MAN!!!! NOW YOUR UNDER MARTIAL LAW, WHOT A SHAME THAT PEOPLE ARE SCARED TO EVEN QUESTION THE US GOVT....GUESS ITS EASIER TO BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOUR TOLD...
@TheHeretic2011 A hoax is an "extraordinary claim," isnt it? And yet you ask us to take your word on "little mistakes?" uh uh. Either you've got BIG mistakes or you've got nothing.
And who gets to decide "mistake?" A hoax newb whose never worked with a camera a day in his life? Cause thats all I've ever seen. Im believing photographers who actually work for a living
HORSE SHIT. Complete and utter. The Moonrocks were given away to 150 FOREIGN COUNTRIES, and are on permanent display in 12 more FOREIGN museums. You are a complete dumbass for not knowing that. And a newb ;)
@TheHeretic2011 "no proof" Since you didnt know that the rocks have been out of NASA's control for 40 years, you arent really trustworthy for whats "proof," now are you? ;)
And you're idea of "faked pics" is piss poor. I'm believing qualified photographers, not newbs
The question, rather, should be; why did we go to the moon in the first place?
Well, firstly we didn't at the time have advanced enough robotics to explore the moon satisfactorily with, secondly we hadn't ever sent human explorers further than near-earth orbit, and thirdly we needed to test the methods and materials used to land and take off again on exoplanetary bodies for use in future exploration, and testing close to home is wiser than going further out and risking more funds..
ITS A CONSPIRACY. LOL
I dont know why we want to go to the moon anyway. Its just a ball of dirt. Why? So we can say America owns the moon so we can build condo's. LEAVE IT ALONE. YOU MIGHT THROW US OFF TRACK, and we go flying thru space into a "white" hole. PEACE!
Splovengates7 5 days ago
@urungutang : if they faked going to the moon. then again this question arises, "Why havent they travelled to the moon yet ? "
amrajontube 1 week ago
@urungutang yea, ur wrong
coolstorybro255 1 week ago
NO SHIT we didn't land on the moon, the reason is because there are "radiation fields" in space, that is why the russians only sent remote robot machines. In order for a ship to protect a human from going through radiation fields the ship would have to be made of MASSIVE EXTREMELY THICK LED WALLS, too heavy to ever lift off into space.
but look it up yourself
deetheo 1 week ago
COZ GEORGE BUSH CAME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT OPIUM COULD NOT GROW ON THE MOON.
allosvenne 4 weeks ago
Because they found a sign saying " No trespassing" written by aliens...... and they didn't want us to pollute the moon either.
tshorse 4 weeks ago 2
because we dont need to send people there anymore...
what would we do? and for what? its incredibly costly and difficult.
AThomasKent 1 month ago
@AThomasKent Aren't wars incredibly costly also?And difficult?And yet we still continue to fight wars.Constantly,one after another.Would this money be better spent investing in our space programs and researching the universe?
urungutang 1 month ago
The reason we don't go back is because the transformers are still there. NO DUH! No, I'm kidding, the real reason? THERE'S NOTHING LEFT TO SEE! A bunch of rocks here, a bunch of craters there. Really come on! Plus, the moon landings cost a LOT! If we keep on going, we'll go broke! For now, there's not going to be any manned spacecrafts to any place. It will take a long long time before we go back to the moon, or mars, or Europa or any other planets
avpkid345 1 month ago
Because it's made of cheese... ? Hmmm is my laptop actually faster than the one one the moon rover? Lol, why don't we go to the moon? Maybe the spacecraft's gas is too expensive?
TheLife1989 1 month ago
Politics and money. yup.
Igotnogod 1 month ago
so the technology is better. so what. technology apparently was sufficient 40 years ago to actually land on the moon.
the answer lies not in technology, which seems to be the only thing you're interested in, but in politics, costs, public interest, even usefulness.
Esudao 1 month ago
What they don't want you to know is they've been on the Moon ever since - black projects N.O.Y.F.B. IS THE CODE FOR THIS LOOK IT UP
6308281 1 month ago
ok, you put the question...how about to answer the question? I can't belive I wasted 1 minute of my time to watch this!
christianpalfi 1 month ago
its bullshit ..... get in a 40 year old car and see how shit it is. 40 year old tech is fucking crap, no way these fuckers went there and got it all right first time no accidents.
horseshit
mikesomething 1 month ago
@mikesomething
Try to find one (1) ounce of proof supporting your theory.
Rob260259 1 month ago
FILIPINO PSYCHOPATH...SCARY...
fiendly7 1 month ago
why can't you go back to yo cuntry?! huh? go go nao BAI!
umadbro201182 1 month ago
@Astrophysicsist i did long time ago... thats why im not brain washed like 98% of people living in the U.S
MrColdyLocks 1 month ago
That is a very good question.I do think they went to the moon for real.But they've seen something there that we are not supposed to know about and "that" something is preventing us going back there.Nothing to do with computers or how expensive it is.Its something totally different.But thats just what i think,i might be wrong.
urungutang 1 month ago 6
@urungutang humans dont go to moon anymore because we already know enough about it and have lots of samples, there is no need to go back
mulgeroinen 1 month ago
@mulgeroinen Well,we've been down to the ocean and we still keep on diving,even though we got the general idea about what's down there.There is no way we know about the moon at least 10% of what we know about the ocean.And since it's been done,pretty easily i might add,with an old technology(no accidents and nothing went wrong),why not do it using a new technology that we have at our disposal now?Should be a piece of cake?
urungutang 1 month ago
@urungutang "we've been down to the ocean and we still keep on diving,even though we got the general idea about what's down there."
Cost of going to the moon and back: 3 billion dollars. (estimated. probably more)
Cost of diving to the ocean floor: less than 100 thousand dollars.
It doesnt matter how easy it is to get to the moon, its all about money.
In reality, scientists say we know more about the moon than we do about our own oceans, so you might want to rephrase your comment.
MegaMan6947 1 month ago
@urungutang
weeluskie 1 month ago
@Astrophysicsist how do you know? were you one of the people that landed? or are you just saying this because you read or saw pictures on books/magazines that claimed it was the moon?
MrColdyLocks 1 month ago
@Astrophysicsist thats thats what they want us to think
MrColdyLocks 1 month ago
we never landed in the moon in the first place
MrColdyLocks 1 month ago
@MrColdyLocks you mean ON the moon, right? ;)
CaptainEffects 1 month ago
Because, dearest Filipino, us Asians are not supposed to drive spaceships. Look at Star Trek. What do you think the REAL reason they kept getting into all those situations was?
manodeldios666 1 month ago
money
vectoronic 1 month ago
Filipino? Southeast Asian?
Latin?
kidasterorig111 1 month ago
Cuz Obama...
JPSwissCheese 1 month ago
Because there is no good reason to go back, no single nation has the money to send a manned mission there and nations are more worried about the current economic climate than space exploration.
Also computer power has little to do with sending a manned mission to the moon.
Phi1point62 1 month ago
ask you'r mother dick!!!
fiendly7 1 month ago
and they talk to each otherand in many cases are the SAME person, its so newbiesdon't persue the the greatest LIE of the century.
caessarion 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Look how smog LIAR and heritic LIAR, and ROB LIAR, and StMusr LIAR, Bogdog LIAR Bogdapollo, the list continues, lie infitesimally. Its weird how ALL, no really, ALL the fake ML truth is constantly bombarded with ML conspiracy aids butt pirates. WHO would go back to same videos over and over and over? And check there pages, all about the ML conspiracy. They get paid, it's that simple, it IS a LIE of SATANIC proportions. God Bless
caessarion 1 month ago
Look how smog LIAR and heritic LIAR, lie infitesimally. Its weird how ALL, no really, ALL the fake ML truth is constantly bombarded with ML conspiracy aids butt pirates. WHO would go back to same videos over and over and over? And check there pages, all about the ML conspiracy. They get paid, it's that simple, it IS a LIE of SATANIC proportions. God Bless
caessarion 1 month ago
@caessarion
Stop smoking weed.
Rob260259 1 month ago
everyone in the world asks themselves that same question 1000 times everyday.
caessarion 1 month ago
@smogmontser Just for the record, I thought it was funny when Aldrin punched him.
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@smogmontser And seriously, If they really landed on the moon, how hard would it be to lay their hand on a bible and repeat what they just said.
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
"how hard would it be"
- How hard would it be to ignore Sibrel and other hoax believers? I don't know. You think Sibrel would say "Wow, if they actually swore on a bible, then maybe Apollo really did happen after all!"?
How hard would it be to ignore the harassing of astronauts and slandering and libeling people having worked on the Apollo program?
How hard would it be to ignore an idiot asking you to swear on a bible that you really love your mother?
Rob260259 1 month ago
@Rob260259 I would have no problem swearing on the bible that I love my mother, because it's true.
People are asked to swear on the bible in court everyday. They aren't usually offended by the request.
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
I would have a severe problem with someone asking me to swear on a bible that I love my mother. I would consider it a huge insult.
Aldrin was not on trial. He was not in a court. He was stalked and harrassed by a 'reporter'.
Your example doesn't hold water.
Rob260259 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
Imagine if you had spent your life test flying planes, and riding the business end of an ICBM into space, and then 40 years later be ambushed in your home, on the street or in a hotel lobby, having your integrity questioned by the likes of Bart Sibrel asking you to swear on a bible that you have really risked your ass going to the moon. I think that is an absolute insult.
Rob260259 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011 Any devoted religious induvidual would be EXTREMELY offended by a cab driver nobody waving a bible around pretending to have religious authority, let alone credibility. Minister authority takes years with extreme dedication to a lifestyle. That Sibrel assumes he can just yell "I HAVE A BIBLE" and expect equal respect is naive ego-mongering in the extreme. Such disrespect should never be rewarded.
Why didnt Sibrel bring a REAL pastor to give the oath?
SpreadingtheMuse 1 month ago
@smogmontser They also confessed to being athiests, so the bible had no maening to them.
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@smogmontser Sorry, I've already been through this.
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@smogmontser Thanks for the pointer, I'll check that out. Although, Aldrin won't swear on a bible that he did land on the moon. Guess he believes in God.
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@smogmontser I think they're making a pretty good stab at dubunking a lot of NASA's so called proof.
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@smogmontser I'm asked to provide proof of my comments, what proof do you have the the T-shirt photo is fake?
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@smogmontser Can you prove that?
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
Can you prove that the Moon landings were faked?
Rob260259 1 month ago
@Rob260259 No, but that doesn't stop me asking questions.
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
"asking questions"
- GOOD!
Rob260259 1 month ago
@Rob260259 But can you answer my question?
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011 Any idiot can ask "a question." But ONLY an idiot would then refuse to listen to the answer as it didnt coddle his pre-conceived bias. The "Hoax" movement has nothing to do with fact and everything to do with refusing to admit they're wrong, even in the face of overwhelming evidence that the landings were real.
SpreadingtheMuse 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
In fact, you're a (tiny) bit like my grandfather, when I showed him my first call phone, several years ago. He said "fake!". It's all some trick.
Rob260259 1 month ago
@Rob260259
typo:
cell phone
Rob260259 1 month ago
@Rob260259 But I understand how a cell phone works.
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
"cell phone"
- Yes, you know how it works. But my granfather did not. And that is why he said "fake!".
Just like you seem to do.
Rob260259 1 month ago
@smogmontser Ever wonder why people just believe what they're told and never question? I'd rather ask and be laughed at than just believe what I'm told.
Ever wonder why some people respond with hostility to a simple question?
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
Ever wonder why many hoax nuts use the f*ck word so often?
Rob260259 1 month ago
@Rob260259 I'm sorry, did I use the F word?
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
"did I use the F word?"
- No. But you're not a hoax nut.
Rob260259 1 month ago
@Rob260259 Thank you.
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
Questions? Ask some more, please.
Rob260259 1 month ago
@Rob260259 OK, If the engine was running when the LM landed, why was the dust not blown away?
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
You do know the lower layer of the Moon's regolith is much more dense than the thin layer made up of vaporized particles right? The moon is a meteor itself, the only thing that can make those craters and that dust, is another meteor.
Rob260259 1 month ago
@Rob260259 Yes, I see the dust moving in the vid of the landing, but the pic's of the LM on the moon do not show any dust having been displaced. In fact it looks undisturbed.
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
"it looks undisturbed"
- Yep. Just like my wife says I look 62.
Rob260259 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
"undisturbed"
- some pics I could find in my own files: AS11-40-5892 or AS11-40-5921 and AS12-46-6781.
If the landings were faked, placing a blast crater under the LM would be the most obvious thing to do in order to "fool" the unwitting public.
Rob260259 1 month ago
@Rob260259 We're back to that circular argument.
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
Explain please?
Rob260259 1 month ago
@Rob260259 The dust was loose enough to print deeply when walked on, yet packed enough to remain in place under a similar pressure of rocket exhaust. Yea, that sounds right.
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
Given that the descent stage engine bell is about 5 ft across at the bottom, and that thrust of the engine at touchdown was about 3,000 pounds, that blast pressure of the rocket exhaust was only about 1 pound per square inch. Which is not much different from the pressure caused by the weight of an astronaut on the moon standing on one foot while walking across the surface.
Rob260259 1 month ago
@Rob260259 Yet, they left some pretty deep impressions. Hard to judge, but the footprints look at least an inch deep.
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
"Hard to judge"
You think *I* have a lot of Apollo vids? Check this channel. And check some of the very debunking videos.
youtube.com/user/BlisterHiker
I have a film to catch. See you. Thanks for the chat.
Rob260259 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
The dust WAS blown away. Many videos show that.
Rob260259 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011 If you're stupid enough to accept a *webpage* of all things as "proof" of your high IQ, then thats proof positive you are, in fact, an idiot ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 1 month ago
@smogmontser
Yup. I don't wonder anymore why these people don't show up there. It's only because they prefer to stay in this cozy little walled garden at Youtube.
I think you and I know what would happen if they ever had to defend their silly theories in a mainstream forum against people who actually DO know what they're talking about.
Rob260259 1 month ago
@smogmontser Are you saying American ingenuity couldn't do it.
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@smogmontser
What's very weird is that hoax nuts claim anyone with an understanding of science could easily see through NASA's lies. Yet they still haven't produced any vaguely plausible reason as to why scientists the * whole world over* fail to see what is incredibly obvious. That is VERY odd... Are they all mind controlled? Is the miniscule band of hoax heads the only ones who can see the 'twoof'? Why can't they come up with any coherent reason for this?
Rob260259 1 month ago
Thank you for the visit, but forget my channel. It's only YouTube.
Check out Clavius instead.
Rob260259 1 month ago
2012!!!! ANOTHER FUCKIN GOVT LIE....SUPPOSE YOUR PREPARING FOR THE END OF THE WORLD!!! HA HA
zakstone123 1 month ago
YOU LOOK A REAL DICKHEAD ON YOUR PICS!!! BUT IM BLOCKING YOU BECOUSE I ONLY CHAT TO EDUCATED PEOPLE!!!
zakstone123 1 month ago
@zakstone123
Why block Heretic2011? Because it's 2012?
LOL
Rob260259 1 month ago
NO...I ONLY RESEARCH THEN MAKE UP MY MIND... I DONT BUY THE LIES AS YOU DO...
IN THE USA YOU CANT EVEN HAVE AN OPINION!!! UNLESS YOUR BRAVE!! DO SOME RESEARCH AND GET BACK TO ME IN A WEEK OR SO..
zakstone123 1 month ago
MAN THATS SO FUNNY... THE RUSSIANS RAN OUT OF MONEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!
zakstone123 1 month ago
40 YEARS OF LIES!!!!!!!!!!!!
we never went there in the first place, the russians wont even try couse they know its not possible!!! there far more advanced than uk or usa....REMEMBER THEY WERE FIRST TO PUT A MAN INTO SPACE!!! COME ON USA WAKE UP...WHERES THE PROOF THEY LANDED?? APART FROM A SHITE VIDEO THATS BE DOCTURED BADLY...WHERES THE STUFF LEFT BEHIND??? RIGHT!!!! MAN OH MAN
zakstone123 1 month ago
@zakstone123 Err, why dont you ASK the russians why they didnt go? Do you have a quote of them saying "We didnt go cause its impossible and no one else can either?" Cause if you do I want that linked right here and right now. They never said it.
30 sec of googling would have told you they didnt go cause their booster rockets F'ed up and they ran out of money. Way to go einstein ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
For all hoax nuts: the whole program of Apollo and the magnitude was impossible to fake. There were several countries involved in tracking the missions, hundreds of peer reviewed papers on the rocks have been written by geologists worldwide. thousands of engineers had to be involved, thousands of pictures and hundreds of hours of film and video were made, UV pictures were made, Lunar reflectors were left there, satellites were launched from SIM bays, et cetera et cetera...
Rob260259 1 month ago
its because theres fuckall there. testing has been done and there is absolute zero chance of sustaining life forms on the moon. therefore its a waste of resources just to go there and walk around plant a flag and go home, space programs would rather invest their time into finding a planet we can travel to and from and harvest resources. with the future of our world eventually coming to an end it would make sense to (START) Working on how to get the fuck off.
TheEducatedtroll 1 month ago
@TheEducatedtroll THERES FUCKALL THERE YOUR ABSOLUTLY 100% CORRECT...NO MOONBUGGY, NO FLAG NO FUCK ALL...IF YOU BELIEVE USA GOVT THEN THE NEXT TIME YOU SEE ELVIS IN KAYMART BUY HIM A BURGER BABY!!! DONT YA JUST LOVE YOUTUBE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
zakstone123 1 month ago
If humanity wants to go 'BACK' to the Moon like in the Apollo (sic) landings then for fcuk's sake take the fluoride out of the water & replace it with MDMA Crack Heroin Grass & even a little LSD for the emotionally stable adults involved in serial butt-sex from the minds of the Gollywood elite & then 'FCUK' the technology because we can fly there in our dreams...
In the meantime salute the flag & vote Republican or Democrat & stop asking yourselves why the hell big-dicks need to lie to us-all...
spacelizardlaw 1 month ago
Why go back and do the same thing again? It's extremely dangerous and expensive! Everything we learned, the Soviets/Russians now know. The only possibly compelling reason to return to the moon would be for long-duration missions to mine Helium 3 or do astronomy. Long-duration on the moon is exponentially more difficult, dangerous and expensive. Have you read about the economy recently? And there is no Cold War to drive anyone's nationalism.
Rob260259 2 months ago
Because Chuck Norris lives there
Mistermarcus84 2 months ago
Because of Moon Rock Spiders.
117That 2 months ago
Because we never went in the first place. Radiation belt.
bernytree66 2 months ago
@bernytree66 i had a radiation belt but the glow got to be too much
kohstamojahn 2 months ago
@bernytree66
Nonsense. Try to find one (1) ounce of evidence for your outrageous theory.
Rob260259 2 months ago
@Rob260259 Do you have any evidence that we did? Oh, I know, a few faked pictures and some rocks no one is allowed to examine. I don't see any proof.
TheHeretic2011 2 months ago
@TheHeretic2011
You don't know much, do you? There are thousands of pictures and many hours of footage. There are six ft intact core tubes and many rocks examined by geologists worldwide, even today. There were sixty experiments on the Moon and their results have been analysed by hundreds of universities and international institutions.
You must be one of those self absorbed fools that thinks he can outsmart scientists.
Rob260259 1 month ago
@Rob260259 Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Landing on the moon is an extraordinary claim. Examine the photos and film. They're full of little mistakes. NASA does not allow ANYONE outside the agency to examine their rocks, and recently SWAT teamed an old lady who had a tiny piece,given to her husband by Neil Armstrong years ago.Google it.
Yea, I suppose they did land on the moon, I mean, the gov has never lied before, HAVE THEY?
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
Yes, landing on the Moon was extraordinary. That's why they are taught in most academic institutions worldwide. The samples have been studied around the world and verified to be non-terrestrial. The massive amount of scientific data returned has spawned hundreds of peer reviewed scientific studies and is still studied today. Impossible to fake that amount of evidence for so long. It is the most documented human achievement ever.
Rob260259 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
How to fake these hours of video and thousands of pictures? How to fake real time tracking telemetry, how to keep all these people silent? How to fake 60 scientific experiments left on the surface and the data received from them? How to fool the thousands of scientists? How to fake 840 pounds of rocks and 6 foot long intact core tube samples brought back? How to fake satellites launched from SIM bays into lunar orbit?
Tell me, please.
Rob260259 1 month ago
@Rob260259 We have landed probes on the moon, we just haven't landed people there. Probes have no problems with the Van Allen belts. Federal funding and non-disclosure agreements go a long way. Much of the pics and video has been discredited, enough that it would be easy to prove fraud in a court of law.(I admit that's not saying much.) I grew up during the Apollo program, it broke my heart when I learned it was fake.
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
The Van Allen Radiation Belts do indeed contain enough radiation to kill a man, if he stayed there long enough. While passing through, Apollo was exposed to an average radiation dose of 0.167 mSv per second. Thirty straight days of that dose would have killed the astronauts. But Apollo passed through the VABs in less than an hour and a half.
How did you 'learn' Apollo & the Moon landings were 'faked'..?
Rob260259 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011 NONE of the video or pics has been "discredited." A amatuer idiot yells "THIS PIC IS FAKE" and you gullibly believe him?
I've seen no pic proven fake by any competent source. At any time.
SpreadingtheMuse 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011 Proof we went
1) Moonrocks out of NASAs control for 40 years. Not a single foreign geologist has ever called them fake
2) Japans LRO satellite, out of NASAs control, took pics the LEMs left behind and released the pics worldwide
3) Video of moondust shows it moving in perfect parabolic arcs, impossible in any atmosphere
4) After 40 years, your ONLY refute of the astroanuts alibi is "liar liar pants on fire." If 40 years isnt enough time, WTF do you need? Honest to christ
SpreadingtheMuse 1 month ago
@Rob260259 P.S. They did fake the pictures, and they didn't do a very good job.
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
"They did fake the pictures"
- All of them?
Anyway, tell me a picture you have 'trouble' with...?
Rob260259 1 month ago
@Rob260259 I have a problem with:
No blast crater under the LM, even though its loose dust.
Shine from support wires used to simulate lower gravity.
Multiple shadows from multiple light sources.
Apollo astronaut missing right foot.
Reflection of man in T-shirt in visor.
Same mountain.in different sizes in different pics. You can find several of them right here on YT. Search and view with an open mind.You gotta admit something ain't right. Oh yea, spacesuit won't fit through LM door.
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
1) Blast crater is a manufactured gripe. It has no basis from any physicist. Total fabrication by newbs pretending to use big words
2) I dont see wires. Neither do any professional theater workers who would know where to look. You only see what you want to
3) I have never seen a pic with more than one shadow. Does not exist
4) I want to see the "Tshirt" pic right here and right now. Does not exist
A lot of this, as you see, is just you making up your story as you go
SpreadingtheMuse 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
Wow... I noticed you got your answers. Anyway; you really think NASA was stupid enough to forget to put a crater under the LM? Stupid enough to move the LM off the set and take a second picture with it missing? Stupid enough to allow a flag to wave in the breeze? To use multiple lighting sources? To release all that so that every high school drop out could see the fakery?
You really don't know much, do you?
Rob260259 1 month ago
@Rob260259Nasa never figured on people being able to analyze the footage. They would only see it on TV once. I realize I'm not the smartest person on the planet,(my IQ is only174),but you people will believe anything . I guess common sense isn't so common.
I think the vast majority of people who care know it's a fraud. I you're not smart enough to figger that out, well, who cares.
My mother said never to argue with idiots, the people watching may not be able to tell the difference.
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
"Nasa never figured on people being able to analyze the footage"
LOL
That's probably why they released hours of videos worldwide. Yeah, that makes sense. Hoax sense, of course.
Rob260259 1 month ago
@Rob260259 OK, you've totally convinced me. I now believe in the moonlanding because I've seen pictures. I also believe in bigfoot because I've seen pics of him as well. And the Loch Ness monster. And the Grey Man. And everything else that anyone with two braincells firing in unison wouldn't believe in. I've been totally convinced by your pathetic attempts at logic and namecalling. Now, I have better things to do with my life than argue with an idiot, so bye.
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011 "namecalling" is perfectly legitimate if your sole evidence is "well it looks fake to me." LOL I had no idea your analysis was quite so professional ;)
WE have objective measures:
1) Moonrocks examined by foreign geologists, out of NASAs control (which you didnt know and had to be told about, BY US)
2) Japans Pics (And I'm sorry, but "looks fake to me" is piss poor evidence, try again Mr 174)
3) Video showing dust moving in a pure vacuum.
None of it ever refuted by you
SpreadingtheMuse 1 month ago
@SpreadingtheMuse II'm sure you've seen the pictures and video of bigfoot. Not to mention the plaster casts of his prints. I believe some claim to have bits of his fur. Sooo, you believe in bigfoot? You must since theres as much evidence of him as there is in the moonlanding. And learn to spell.
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
Tell us; are you into Opus Dei, JFK, Martin Luther King, Illuminati, Freemasons, Templar Knights, Nibiru, New World Order, 9/11 IJ, Electromagnetic Mind Control, chemtrails and HAARP, too?
Rob260259 1 month ago
@Rob260259 I admit I looked into JFK, but who hasn't.
Look, I realize you have nothing better to do than hang on YT all day, so I'll throw you a bone. Search Disney moonlanding here on YT. I know, I know, it's not evidence unless it supports your position, but hey, give it a look anyway.
I do have better things to do. I'm going deer hunting. If I see bigfoot, I'll tell him you said hi.
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
Thank you for confirmation that you have NO knowledge about this. Just like you have NO education in this field. You're unable to answer simple questions and only saying "fake" because it's beyond your comprehension and because you don't understand it. Very confirming indeed. You failed. So unless you have any other bright words of wisdom, have a nice day.
Rob260259 1 month ago
@Rob260259 I went and checked out your channel. Looks like you've got a lot of vids on this. Are you receiving a YT dividend check? If so,it seems you have a financial reason for your opinions. Afraid you're going to loose money if people stop believing?
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@Rob260259 How about this. BBC news "Fake Dutch moon rock revealed". The Dutch believed it was real for forty years, but when they tested it........Well? It turned out to be petrified wood. Would you have us believe they brought wood back from the moon?
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheHeretic2011
" ..a few faked pictures and some rocks no one is allowed to examine.."
Your words.
So there are petrochemists who do examine rocks? Well, sorry to disappoint you, the huge piece of petrified wood that was researched by Wim van Westrenen had nothing to do with NASA. Former PM Drees got it from the US Ambassador.
You actually believe NASA would have directed giving one of their 48 pristine moon rocks to a retired 87 year old statesman?
Rob260259 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
All about the Dutch Moon Rock:
watch?v=mHALUGcEEiQ&feature=plcp&context=C3392d91UDOEgsToPDskILuWPdYNcDN4a8M3Ek1fT0
Rob260259 1 month ago
@Rob260259 OK,only 11 countries recieved samples they could analyze. They were also countries that recieved foreign aid. All others recieved samples(goodwill rock) sealed in lucite. But lets say the samples are real. The Russians retreived moon rocks and dust too. They didn't have to land people there to do it. Turns out they used a mechanism similar to the old mechanical banks. No real robotics required. So, possesion of rocks is not proof of people. I'm enjoying this, so please don't insult me
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
Insult you? LOL
You're enjoying it? Great!
The Soviet Luna 16/20/24 returned 100/55/170 gram of soil. With a lot of trouble, but they succeeded. Have you got any clue how many probes it would take to return 800+ pounds of dust and rocks from the Moon? I guess not.
Yes, the Soviets had a few samples, too. And had a nice chance to compare them with their own. Guess what...?
Rob260259 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
These were the non-American institues receiving samples for examiniation and research: University Cambridge, England, Queen Mary College, London, England, University of Durham, England, Geologic Survey, Canada, Australian Nat'l University, Canberra, Univ. Manchester, Manchester, England, University Berne, Switzerland, Univ. Cologne, Germany, Max Planke Inst., Fur Chemie, Mainz, Germany. Want some more, for your pleasure?
Rob260259 1 month ago
@Rob260259 No thanks, I found the list.
In an earlier post you said "too big to fake". The Manhatten project employed 130,000 people and spent 2 billion dollars (24 bil todays money) and was kept secret. The Air Force had it's own space program. They claim 5 times the launches as NASA's program, yet no one knew.
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
"yet no one knew"
- How do you know? How long was it kept secret?
Rob260259 1 month ago
@Rob260259 It was finally disclosed a few years ago Excellent documentary on PBS.
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
The Manhattan Project NEVER WAS 'kept secret': At the Pottsdam conference in 1945, Truman told Stalin, thinking it would be a revelation, that the US had it, Stalin replied "yes, but you only have two". The Soviets had at least one spy inside Los Alamos, and were able to steal enough of what they could not figure out for themselves to make a copy of Fat Man. What was kept secret was that the first Soviet A-bomb was basically a copy of Fat Man. For a few years..
Rob260259 1 month ago
@Rob260259 And I'm sure they know about Apollo too.
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
Yes, the Soviets knew a lot about Apollo. The Soviet DSN had a very capable STC, monitoring most of the telemetry. The Soviet SIGINT at Lourdes, Cuba, watched and monitored ALL launches, in fact.
Next please.
Rob260259 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
Mentioning the Soviets; why have they not stated that the landings were faked? That would have brought them great prestige during the Cold War.
Instead, the acknowledged the landing of A11.
Rob260259 1 month ago
@Rob260259 Actually, it would have made them look petty.
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
"T-shirt"
- So you actually think NASA was stupid enough to release the picture with the reflection of a man in a T-shirt, so that every high school drop out could see the fakery?
LOL
Now that is too funny.
Rob260259 1 month ago
@Rob260259 So, when they screw up, they didn't really screw up, because they wouldn't screw up. Is that what they call a circular argument?
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
Boy, this is fun.
Rob260259 1 month ago
@Rob260259 Any idea why this thing won't let me post the link?
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@Rob260259 youtube.com/watch?v=RPUpmW04OIY
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
Comment removed
Rob260259 1 month ago
Comment removed
Rob260259 1 month ago
@Rob260259 The pic can be found in the Disney vid I mentioned earlier. Some things you just gotta' do for yerself mate.
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
So you can't find the number?
"Some things you just gotta' do for yerself mate"
.
CLAVIUS.
Rob260259 1 month ago
@Rob260259 I'll find it and post the address.
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
You fail. How surprising...
Rob260259 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011 GREAT POST!!! ITS OBVIOUS....TRUTH IS TRUTH!!!
zakstone123 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
"My IQ is 174" and is that jsut another dumb thing we're supposed to believe without evidence? ;)
Bear in mind, there's more proof for a moonlanding than there is of your IQ being over 100. Your sole evidence of "cause I say so" is naive in the extreme and you know it.
There is zero proof of fake. There is no evidence that hasnt been refuted already at sometime someplace. Easy challenge, name ANY evidence of "fake" thats never been refuted at any time. Go right ahead
SpreadingtheMuse 1 month ago
@SpreadingtheMuse Jsut? My IQ is not my opinion. You can go to the MENSA website and take the test yourself. Or maybe you know better than they.
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@Rob260259 Yes they really were THAT STUPID...THANKS TO TODAYS SOFTWARE ITS EASY TO PROVE THE LYING BASTARDS FAKED IT ALL... KENNADY, 911 , VIETNAM FALSE FLAG WAR, 58.OOO USA TROOPS KILLED, IRAQ ETC ETC ETC...MAN OH MAN!!!! NOW YOUR UNDER MARTIAL LAW, WHOT A SHAME THAT PEOPLE ARE SCARED TO EVEN QUESTION THE US GOVT....GUESS ITS EASIER TO BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOUR TOLD...
zakstone123 1 month ago
@zakstone123 So in other words, you're dumb enough to believe every single conspiracy you ever hear. ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 1 month ago
@zakstone123
Tell me, do they have cars in your town?
Rob260259 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
* where is your picture of the multiple shadows?
* where is your picture of the missing right foot?
* where is your picture of a reflection of man in a T-shirt?
Rob260259 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
"Reflection of man in T-shirt in visor"
- I'm still waiting for the number of that picture. Found it?
Rob260259 1 month ago
@Rob260259 "VABs" are a big scary word newbs hear on TV and then repeat, pretending it makes them sound smart. Here's what you didnt know:
1) Radiation exposure is about TIME. Not enough time = not enough rad to kill you
2) The VABs are full of particle radiation. Blockable by plastic 88% of space radiation is either alpha or beta, 100% blockable with plexiglas
SpreadingtheMuse 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011 A hoax is an "extraordinary claim," isnt it? And yet you ask us to take your word on "little mistakes?" uh uh. Either you've got BIG mistakes or you've got nothing.
And who gets to decide "mistake?" A hoax newb whose never worked with a camera a day in his life? Cause thats all I've ever seen. Im believing photographers who actually work for a living
SpreadingtheMuse 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011 "NASA does not allow"
HORSE SHIT. Complete and utter. The Moonrocks were given away to 150 FOREIGN COUNTRIES, and are on permanent display in 12 more FOREIGN museums. You are a complete dumbass for not knowing that. And a newb ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011 "no proof" Since you didnt know that the rocks have been out of NASA's control for 40 years, you arent really trustworthy for whats "proof," now are you? ;)
And you're idea of "faked pics" is piss poor. I'm believing qualified photographers, not newbs
SpreadingtheMuse 1 month ago
@SpreadingtheMuse Wow, lots of emotion and name calling, but no evidence.
TheHeretic2011 1 month ago
@TheHeretic2011
I refuted all your "points" and you have no response. Very telling ;)
Even you know you're grasping straws ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 1 month ago
my guess because the moon is a giant rock,
there are no natural resources,
no gems or other ''expensive'' or other rare materials
so in other words there is simply no reason for us humans to make such an expensive trip i guess,
the only purpose of NASA going there was to beat the Russians,
seconds off all for the sake of scientific research, NASA collected enough sample's and did enough research to completely understand the moon habitat.
or maby we never went to moon ?
kjah11 2 months ago
The question, rather, should be; why did we go to the moon in the first place?
Well, firstly we didn't at the time have advanced enough robotics to explore the moon satisfactorily with, secondly we hadn't ever sent human explorers further than near-earth orbit, and thirdly we needed to test the methods and materials used to land and take off again on exoplanetary bodies for use in future exploration, and testing close to home is wiser than going further out and risking more funds..
GronTheMighty 2 months ago
@GronTheMighty The question, rather, should be; did we go to the moon? seriously... Who the hell can prove it?
drughello 2 months ago