Added: 3 years ago
From: AlJazeeraEnglish
Views: 6,642
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (56)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Sudan lost about 2/3rds of it's oil, the leader said he was told he would be Saddamised if he resisted the breakup of his country.

    For the world's greatest historical (and among current - see Iraq) human rights abusers pass judgement on the Third World through this court and through the mainstream media regularly. The Third world's resources are weedled away through regime changes which are fed by human rights abuse allegations.. And that and that alone is Ocampo's job.

  • Himself and Jazeera just finished a major collaboration, the demonisation of Libya's Government and the presentation of the moral case for the barbaric coup we have seen in which tens of thousands may have died, cities were bombed to bits... all in the stated name of human rights - and these guys the ICC help through demonising only one side (the anti-US side)... Ocampo is not interested in the slughtest in the crimes of Al Qaeda in Libya or NATO.

  • Man, the guy can barely speak English comfortably, I wonder how he can be the chief prosecutor of the ICC...

  • jis inglis is térribol, haf eni of iu anderstud uat ji sed?

  • This man is a idoit and a twit, one question i pose whoever give this man a qualification to be a judge is an idoit himself. Its embrassing to see that hes leading a case against a sitting head of state this man is embrassing to even look at let alone hear him talk, the odd thing is i heard he hasnt even been to darfur in his life it just proves how fixed and messed up the icc actualli is.

  • Ocampo is a twit how on earth did this guy get a qualification to be prosecutor its embrassing to even look at him let alone hear him speak. The fact that he leading a case to arrest a head of state is laugable the only thing he should be doing he cleaning the toilets back in argentina where he deserves, this man is an imposter and you wonder why nobody gives too shits about the icc because they hire laughing stocks like him.

  • Ocampo is the UN's Paris Hilton.

    without the sex tape... :D

    or maybe... hmmmmm

  • He is a retard he should be tried in a sudanese court. Even the darfuris don't want him to try bashir three dafuri tribes who suposedly have been victims of genocide at the hands of the gov't have sued Mr. Ocampo.

  • For those morons who think Luis Moreno Ocampo is from spain he's a Great Argentinian and he's doing a lot, but he knows that the important thing is to protect the people now, because at the end the Bashir piece of shit will go to Justice. But Meanwhile people is dying.

  • Does it trivialize international crimes when I say like OMFG Ocampo is hotter than hotness? What hubby material! Yummerz on the Ocampo 'campo.

  • he's from Argentina, although not even spanish speakers can understand him

  • it has beene a long time coming backe around e.a.u and the i.c.c are juste the tipe of the eyce burge coloniale monstere and slave masters are about to reincarnate throughe nato and new europeane unione but lette them u.s israile nato and the reste of the u.s u.n allies lette them be sure that theye shose a wrong time and a wrong place to wake up at the muslim worlde itselfe you juste wake up to be pute righte backe to evine a deepere sleepe than we hade you on bfore

  • Ocampo is an infernal lier, just he wants to feel others he is doing something, even by using bribery to veil the truth.

  • you mean an infernal Lawyer . . . do you know what it takes for a person to be the prosecutor of an international court?.

    plus the ICC jurisdiction is very restricted, internacion laws for univeral justice are still on the line of production. . the UN is not powerfull enough in my opinion

  • thank you ICC,

    i hope justice is made in darfur

  • people please don't talk about things you don't have a clue of .. these crimes have been done but we sudanese don't want the ICC to judge him we wish someday to have an independent court and an independent judge to sentence him because him being sentenced by the ICC is hemiliating to sudan and sudanese people

  • Sudan has the right to expel the humanitarian organizations, they ample time to do good for Sudan, but instead they ganged against the country undermining its authority and working as spy. The end result was that the ICC has issued an arrest warrant for the President AlBashir,and ignoring the Israeli war criminals Peres,Olmert,Livny,Barak

    What we are witnessing now is a biased and a plot against Muslims all around the world we must brace ourselves for the worst,Israel will be dismantled for sure

  • dont talk about figures, you might look like the most stupid man of the year if you look at the total poplation in sudan and in darfur the figures will never match and your accusation will be silly how many in the camps how many in darfur now and how many been sent to a third country, it cant be 300000 people killed . the only figure you can talk about is how much you got in your bank account to do this

  • Ogaden's tragedies has been hidden from the eyes of the world, for nearly a 100 years long abusess against innocent Ogadeni people. It is time to make it an end.

  • Ocampo is a coward. He is using enemies propaganda but long short talk you will never winnn and never get president bashir

  • Justice for Sudan

  • well, what about you, Kdees don't you have dark spots also? Remember the sun has spots, it's not all yellow

  • The UN requested one of its comissions to investigate the situation in Darfur early this year, and those conclusions where to be discolusured to the prosecutor. This report, reports from Human Rights watch, and many other organizations agree that sudanese government's responsible in the crimes.

    The curt has jurisdiction because the security council requested its intervention in March 2005.

    Nobody and no country should be above the law

  • Well let me just point this out , Darfourian People have suffered a lot not just by marginalizing them but killing and burning their existence do u know how much it feels to see your relatives been killed infront of you or just a poor person to be killed is just like nothing. I would have to say that a person in charge has to be judge and the prosecutor is been sent by the destiny to bring back the stolen right of Darfourian poor people.

  • this is the new face from AMERCA faces it is clear like the sun amerca manage this fucking cour with a high enteligent by acting that it is not member in it ok why it is not memeber in it? ither the icc is bad or not recognizeable or ther are another thing hiden if so please think with me and use you mind.

  • with all negatives of current khartoum regeam,i have to admitt that i felt a bit disappointed,not from the idea of having Omer H.el bashier jailed or prosecuted,but rather from the subtle violation of my country's sovergnity in such an easily figurered out scenario of the continuous westren greeds in our region.

  • It more disappointing to know that this prosecutor him self is facing some sexual assault charges among other charges. FUNNY.

  • there is no proof for such allegations, there was no sexual crime. plus a person is inocent until prooved the oposite by an according court.

    NO proof, NO witness, not even a VICTIM claiming for justice. . in my personal opinion it is obviusly a lie to discredit him.

    And i don t see how can u all talk about this kind of subjects since your culture s foundation is based on denying womans rights, and gender discrimination. Sexism in kuwait is still alive and well.

  • No proof? Why don't you go and google it.

    And who said I was from Kuwait?

    Thank you.

  • i did more than just search trough google and found no conclusive proof.

    please send me the "irrefutable and 100% indisputable" proof that you have supposedly found.

    .. your channel´s info says that you are from kuwait.

    .you are welcome.

  • You want to find this information, don't you? I'll help. Check the newspaper articles in google.

    No........my channel's info says that my NETWORK is Kuwait.

    Thank you again.

  • A Newspaper article is not a proof of anything. (that s not an opinion, is a FACT)

    and yes i did read a lot of those.

    if you pay atention to the words used in those articles they are very speculative and use abstract sentences, and they dont make any direct affirmation (they don t say "moreno ocampo IS guilty of ..."), they just describe the supposed accusations of "sexual misconduct" (and i quote -"there is no proof that any such misconduct ever took place."- taken from sudanes newspaper.

  • It depends what the word proof means to you. If you think proof is sending organisations to lie about what is actually happening in a country, then that's your opinion. Moreno is facing charges. How come he's the prosecutor in the ICC when he's facing charges himself?

    And if you think the ICC is fair, why didn't the ICC look at what bush was doing in Iraq, Afghanistan and even Guantanamo?

  • -there is only one meaning and only one posible interpretation for the word "proof". (that is : any materialy recognosible mean, that can show undeniably that an action or event of the past took place.).

    charges don t mean he is guilty, is just an acusation that has to be prooved.

    if he is declared guilty then he will be removed from his position according to the Rome Statute.

    To be charged does NOT instantly means you are guilty. (he is presumed inocent until sentenced otherwhise).

  • As i said before the ICC needs to have jurisdiction over a country to press charges against any of their citizens. USA is not part of the Rome Statute so the ICC does not have any jurisdiction over Americans.

    The ICC does NOT have "worldwide" hability to accuse any person in the world.

    i do think BUSH is an international criminal for what he did, but the ICC cant do nothing.

    and i do think the ICC is fair because it prosecutes individuals for crimes against humanity genocide and war crimes

  • The fact that the ICC is NOT fair is what you JUST SAID!...... "if he is declared guilty then he will be removed from his position according to the Rome Statute."

    Well for your information, Sudan isn't part of the Rome Statute either!

  • Sudan is part of the UN since Nov1956. One of the main organs of the UN is the Security Council, that has the power to order investigations to the ICC.

    The Security Council gave in 2005 the green light to the ICC to proceed over sudan after the Request of the "Palestinian National Authority" to investigate over the conflict.

    Because of the Civil War, Sudan has no power over his own territory, wich lead the rise of many sub-States, that are considered members of the International Comunity.

  • Don t you want war criminals to be judged for their crimes?

    Sudan is consumed by civil wars. i agree with people that thinks that Sudan has the right to judge their own criminals by themselves, but Sudan just cant because of their institutional instability and the rebel Sub-Armys that control part of their territory, dividing the whole nation.the ICC at least gives sudan the posibility of some sort of judicial power and legal control for war crimes and crimes against humanity. THE ICC IS FAIR

  • ....which means the people of Sudan should decide whether they want 'unfair' courts like the ICC to judge their own president...and believe me, the Sudanese DON'T WANT ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE ICC!

  • I stick to what I have said....

    The fact that the ICC is NOT fair is what you JUST SAID!...... "if he is declared guilty then he will be removed from his position according to the Rome Statute."

    You know that Sudan isn't part of the Rome Statute and America isn't either. But what you call 'fair' is to judge Sudan but not America...

    And how is that fair....?

  • i m having a hard time triyng to understand you. . so what you are saying is that with only the acusation itself he should be removed automaticaly? , and what if he is declared inocent afterwards?. do you think that would be fair then? cause you are terrible wrong if you think so, and that is not an opinion, is call Due Process.

    -Sudan explicitly gave jurisdiction over his own teritory to the ICC, beacuse of the request of "Palestinian National Authority"and America did not. simply as that.

  • and as i said before sudan has the right to convict war criminals, but if they dont do that, then the ICC comes into action.

    Public opinion don t afect the fact that he is guilty. half of america and half of the world loves Bush, that doesnt mean he is not a criminal. After the acusation Omar Al-Bashir took reprisals expulsing 13 NGO´s leaving more than 1millon sudaneses starving, not all sudan loves him.

    the ICC is Fair. why dont you go and read their convictions, just like i did.

  • The ICC can not interfere in any country's business especially if they are NOT part of it.

    If as you say the ICC is fair....America is not part of it but can you explain why Bush isn't in court now?

    I'm not quite sure HALF of the world loves him :S

    Yes that is true, 13 organisations were expelled because they were sending false information about what is happening in Sudan.

  • nice talking to you .

    live long and prosper.

  • Right back atchya!

  • However, African organisations were replaced so 1million people are not starving.

    And please be more specific with your figures...

  • try to at least see where you are standing.

    you are defending a war criminal and a dictator who has being ruling a country for 20 years. and you are critizicing an international court based on assumptions of what you believe the law is. but you are wrong- and that my dear friend is a fact.

    i ve being studing matters of international jurisdiction for 3 years now, and it is what it is. international laws do have counted failures, but the matters you were reffering are not any of those.

  • And that's where we don't agree-I think you're wrong too because a sexual harasser can't be a prosecutor and that IS THE FACT.

  • The ICC should look at the accusations and if he is guilty he should be removed or else people will not look at the ICC as court.......

  • ok , i m done talking to you ..

    you are saying whats your own opinion witch i respect.

    but i was stating the real facts. FACTS:The ICC is an international court that has jurisdiction over other countrys after those countrys accept the ICC´s future intervations thats why it was created in the first place.

    i ve said about five times that the ICC cant operate where there is no jurisdiction. i dont know why you keep insisting on that.

    -and YES 1million refugees ARE starving.

  • No. They are not one million. Please reconsider your facts.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more