The Kennedy Assassination...the angle of the killing shot..wmv

[Chw4]

abennett....if the head shot came from the rear, why was there not blood nor brain matter all over Gov. and Mrs. Connelley as well as the driver, Agent Greer and the other agent in the passenger seat? Jackie is reaching for skull fragments and brain matter on the TRUNK of the car which is indicative of a side, frontal shot. The laws of physics cannot be disputed.

[autoad]

@Chw4 The head shot did come from the rear. The Connally's and the two agents were covered in particulate matter. Some of the particulate matter and bits of JFK's scull went on the trunk lid due to the headwind. There were wind gusts up to 20 mph in Dealey Plaza. The laws of physics do not apply to bullets. Bullets are designed to penetrate their target and not transfer their energy. Frames 313, 314 and 315 of the Zapruder film shows JFK's head was pushed forward about 2 inches.

[Moontv]

THat shot would have hit Jackie



[oTGFoCONViCT]

@Moontv i keep following u for some reason :/?

[jasrogg]

hmmmmm.

[Igot1thatcansee]

The kill shot came from inside the car.

[abennett4]

Just watched the National Geographic special, "The Lost Bullet". The presenters make a strong case that the first of Oswald's three shots came even before most theories hypothesis. The theory is that the first shot his a traffic light fixture, ricocheted to concrete (around a manhole cover) near the triple underpass a fragment of which struck James Tague. This would have given Oswald 11 seconds instread of the 8.4 generally accepted. Plenty of time for an experienced sharpshooter.

[HammerLex77]

@abennett4 I watched that programme too. And yet again, a documentary claims to practically solve the assassination in 60 minutes when some people have been trying nearly 50 years. Just another theory that can be added to the others and potentially takes us even further from the truth. I don't buy it.

Kennedy was shot at from the front in my opinion and there were more than 3 shots.

[cookiepush1]

@HammerLex77 Opinion? Opinion without facts is faith and not worthy of being considered. State the facts which lead to to conclude, with high probability, that a bullet from the front hit Kennedy and that more than 3 bullets were fired, or that Oswald acted in concert with others. It's been 50 years and no one has yet to provide any proof. Do you possess data that I don't?. If so, please elaborate.

[HammerLex77]

@cookiepush1 Earl Warren, is that you??

[no288]

@abennett4

l agree then he would have plenty of time if that were the case, but not many buy that theory by Max Holland...but IF Oswald had up to 11 seconds that will open for an even more suspicious behaviour on why the secrets service men did nothing for a whole 11 seconds...thats a long time for a skilled SS man not to react.. I know the agents failed that day but Mr Holland' mock the agents even more with his 11 seconds theory ....

[6969clitlicker]

THATS INTERESTING I THINK A LOT OF PEOPLE WOULD NOT HAVE THOUGHT OF THAT NICE ONE

[2237lemon]

well its a plausible theory... it would be easy to conceal the getaway by having a small delivery truck back up to the pergola then throw the gun in back , a guy in the back slams the door shut and shooter walks walk away as the truck driver 'mosies' on out of there.Just not enough evidence at this point though. 50 years later of what was going on behind the pergola

[737sunset]

Thanks for posting this. I was at DP recently. This seems more plausible than a frontal shot. Also, there is a bullet? pock mark on the concrete right next to a manhole cover, opposite the road, which closely matches this angle or from the south side of TSBD. I've just never bought that LHO could fire so well with such a crummy rifle/scope.

[abennett4]

This from "YouGov" , an organization that conducts surveys on a wide variety of topics. The results from the latest poll will frustrate the pro-conspiracy cultists.

"When asked if Oswald killed JFK, 6% said he “definitely” did not kill him and 11% said he probably did not do it. 33%, however, said that Oswald “definitely” killed our 35th President and 36% said he “probably” killed him."

My math says 33%+36%=69% that believe LHO probably/definitely killed JFK.

Bye bye public support! LOL

[abennett4]

At frame 313 of the z-film Kennedy DOES move forward 3-4 inches. The tissue splatter is forwards. All this is clear indication of a shot from the rear. The later back and to the left action is due to the jet effect and neuromuscular spasms.

[cruisersism]

@abennett4 Haahahahahahahahahahahahahahah­ahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahhahah­aaahhahahahahahahahahahahahaha­hahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa­aaaaaaaaaahahahahahahhhhhhhhhh­hhhhhhhhahahahahahahahahahahah­ahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa­aaahhahhahahahahahahahahahahah­ah

[abennett4]

Don't know what this is supposed to show but the credible evidence shows that Oswald acted alone.

[cruisersism]

@abennett4 Take your head out please and see the light.

[abennett4]

@cruisersism Such constructive critcism! You learn that in school?

[cruisersism]

@abennett4 Short and to the point. Works every time.

[Doug41160]

THis is a very interesting and compelling theory of yours. After all the years of researching this case, i never examined this possibility. Your video and photos opens an entire new location for one of the assassins firing that day!

[7071t6]

So the bullet at that angle did not get Jackie at all, No i believe it was from the front, sure some shot's could have came from other site's to put off the witnesses, but to Kill JFK,, the first shot was from the Front, you see JFK move Back a little after it, there were bullet fragment's taken out of the car, windscreen, but i believe the lead car has something to do with it, in the trunk a sniper, you see the lead car as the Z film shows under the bridge, light blue Chev? My opinion Cheers.

[ZedPhoton]

Definately a inside job to remove Kennedy... Sad... Great leaders always get killed before their job is done...

[thezachattack014]

its better than some of the other stupid theories iv seen so far.

[Dr1Canuckchuck]

It was the butler, in the kitchen, with a lead pipe.

[RoyalBarrel]

Ok this just saddens me, watching a guy die over and over, and this isn't a movie, this is real

[tubeyou9878]

The-safest-place-for-the-shoot­er-was-in-the-trunk.If-nothing­-else-the-shooters-in-other-po­sitions-were-just-make-people-­think-it-came-from-Oswald's-di­rection.He-was-shot-in-the-bac­k-this-could-have-come-from-th­e-trunk.

[SuperBandstand]

all kennedy asassination footage has been altered or manufactured,and the ruby oswald footage is not live its been edited ,,,,,,,,and most if not all photographs are fake..........................

[Chw4]

There is NO WAY that the fatal head shot came from the rear. Simply put, a shot from the rear would NOT propel the head BACKWARD, with brain matter and bone sent to the rear and left of the limo, the head would have been propelled FORWARD with brain matter and bone projected into the front driver and front passenger's area. The fatal headshot CLEARLY came from the right of the limo. Are you going to believe the Warren Commission or the laws of physics and your own eyes?

[abennett4]

@Chw4 Actually Kennedy's head *was* propelled forward. If you examine frame 313 of the Zapruder film not only does Kennedy's head move 3 to 4 inches forward from frame 312, the blood and brain tissue splatter is up and forwards indicating a shot from the rear. The Marie Muchmore photo from another angle shows the exact same thing. Google "dealey plaza head wound photographic evidence" and you will see what I mean. And besides, the ballistics and autopsy prove Kennedy was shot from behind.

[univibe23]

No way would a professional hit man have chosen that location to shoot from. He would have been very likely to have killed Jackie rather than JFK. Besides this and the picket fence offered no real concealment as witnesses were standing mere feet away. In fact that is were most of the bystanders ran to only to find nothing just seconds after the shooting. But most importantly the angles are just terrible really--you should go there and check for yourself if you doubt it.

[bribos99]

@univibe23 Test your theory mate: time yourself taking a picture with a camera, putting the lens cap on and putting it in your pocket. How long does it take? There was a gunman and an associate in a suit posing as a SS man standing near the corner of the picket fence. Shot fired from a suppressed gun makes nothing more than a pffft of sound. The barrell comes off the gun as it is handed to the man in the suit who sticks it inside his coat. That whole thing takes about 5 seconds top.

[NeilCrouse]

Very cool find bro. I'm finding that more and more of these "gems" in the footage taken that day are being found. It's probably due to the fact that the I-net has brought loads and loads of people together to look at this stuff.

I have a find of my own, it has nothing to do with the killing, but a cool find none the less. It's called "JFK Assassination - New Person found in Infamous "Moorman Photo", the link is ( watch?v=zRvXSwNInqE ).

C-Ya, and again, good job on the video :)

[EliteXI7]

Fake or not it was interesting thanks!!!

[aifammafiaaifam]

all the footage is fake..

[custardpie1975]

Very interesting. What puzzles me is if the gunman or gunmen were close to Zapruder, why didn't he or his assistant "jump" when the shots were fired?

[TheVeneth]

@custardpie1975 Could have been used subsonic ammunition with surpresor.. these guys were profi's and not cowboys.. dont you get it? thats why those large wounds.. cos bullet was slow.. fast bullets make less demage and tend to fly clean trough.. not mentioning that ammunition was somehow special as well

[autoad]

@custardpie1975 That's a great question. An examination of the Zapruder film shows that Zapruder did "jump" when the shots that came from the 6th floor of the TSBD were fired. In a CBS documentary an experiment was conducted where people were given movie cameras that were the same as the one Zapruder used. They were told in advance that shots were going to be fired and they were not to "jump" while they filmed. Nobody was able to keep from "jumping" even though they were given prior notice

[autoad]

@custardpie1975 of the shots to be fired. When they compared the footage of the Z-film to the footage of the test subjects they noticed the extreme similarities in the "jump" patterns.

Zapruder didn't hear any shots to his right because there were no shots fired from his right. The autopsy report and the HSCA pathologists all said JFK was struck twice from behind; once in the upper back and once in the back of the head. The HSCA pathologists said there was no medical evidence to support any

[autoad]

@custardpie1975 theories of the president being shot from the front or the side. All the the supporting evidence confirms that the head shot came from behind. There are people who fabricate wild theories about the shots from the knoll, the overpass or any of a dozen other locations around Dealey Plaza. But all the physical evidence says JFK was shot from behind. All of the theories are entertaining but they lack any supporting evidence.

[BlevinsBI]

As a matter of fact I found the location of the gunmen but they are in the location of the pillar just to the right of Zapuder. I have real photos of both gunmen and you can see these men very clear and you can even see these men holding their rifles in there hands. And I have another photo of one of them taking aim with his rifle. Plus the last shot fired also can be seen in the location I found. By the Nix film. I work on facts. and find the proof to back it up

[LoneNutter1]

@BlevinsBI I'd like to see that picture. Can you tell me where I can look at it? Thanks.

[steverid]

Nice work M.K. I have never personally believed that Oswald was by any means "the lone gunman". The Kennedy assassination has & will forever be a mystery. Thank you for your efforts to find the truth.....in all you do.

Take care,

Stevesquatch