@jinggojonah Not in this theory ordinary objects would collapse the wave function or react with the wave-particle duality of light. Our Universe would carry on as a process of continuous change or creation the only difference is there would be no one to observer it!
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T CREATE. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. It only operates once there is life and reproduction and not before, so it couldn't be involved in life's origins. Natural selection is a passive process, not a creative process. The real issue is not natural selection but what biological variations are possible in nature. Read my Internet article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from an ape-like creature anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from a four-legged dog-like creature. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE, because of entropy, could not have sustained itself eternally. Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living, reproducing if their reproductive system, vital structures, and organs hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species.
@yoda84345 This is true! In this theory the outward emission and inward absorption of these waves forms the process we see and feel as the passage or flow of Time.
I like the thought that the universe is made up of tiny particles (waves) that are bound by laws and systems and everything just follows this ad infinitum. However the universe has created higher life forms and so these higher life forms are the things that can influence the future/probability.
@shagster1970 Yes! But could these higher life forms only be able to influence the future and form their own probability because the atoms have bonded together? Whatever movement we make has to start off at the quantum level by collapsing the wave-particle duality of light. Therefore Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle can be the same uncertainty that the observer will have with any future event forming the passage of time in our everyday life.
@garouHH Yes! But what if the evolution of life had rules like the rule of Chess that were laid down by mathematic and geometry of physics? That gives us a geometrical therefore mathematical base for the evolution of life explaining why Nature never produces straight lines but an endless array of curves and spirals.
Thought provoking video. One thing that I wonder about when it comes to time in the universe is what about the accelerating expansion of the universe? is the expansion causing time to speed up at all or does it have no affect?
I like how you always compare a spiral in space to a seashell on Earth. The seashells do have that spiral kind of shape to them.
@HaleyMary The Universe is made up of an infinite number of reference frames and each one will have its own proper time. Time will slow down for an observer accelerating towards the speed of light relative to an observer not accelerating, see the Twin Paradox. I have my doubts if we have an accelerating expansion of the universe there is no centre to our Universe it is only spacetime that is expanding within each individual reference frame relative to all the other frames of reference.
@nickharvey7 Since both galaxies are moving away from each other at the same acceleration, they will have symmetrical rates of time. The spacetime between them will be relatively faster and faster the closer it gets to the midpoint. But light will travel at the same velocity no matter who is observing it or how fast they are moving. So we will see the other galaxy in its past state, but aging less and less until the sum of our accelerations equals light speed and then it will appear to be
frozen in time! However we can still observe ourselves moving further away from that location until we are actually moving at light speed, and then we won't see it at all. Instead we will be traveling backward in time and I have no idea what that will be like. But clearly everything else I've said is rock solid facts.
@5ben11yax Yes! In this theory EMR works as a dynamic ether thought-out our whole Universe. All matter forms its own electromagnetic fields forming its own reference frame or spacetime. Each reference frame will have its own proper time relative to its position and momentum. Even the observer will do this forming their own future in space and time or reference frame.
Hi! Have you tried the British Box Breakout (do a search on google)? Ive heard some extraordinary things about it and my mate got tons of dough.
kritipoudel7 2 months ago
Deepak Chopra: In the absence of an observer, everything else is a quantum soup.
jinggojonah 4 months ago
@jinggojonah Not in this theory ordinary objects would collapse the wave function or react with the wave-particle duality of light. Our Universe would carry on as a process of continuous change or creation the only difference is there would be no one to observer it!
nickharvey7 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T CREATE. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. It only operates once there is life and reproduction and not before, so it couldn't be involved in life's origins. Natural selection is a passive process, not a creative process. The real issue is not natural selection but what biological variations are possible in nature. Read my Internet article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from an ape-like creature anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from a four-legged dog-like creature. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE, because of entropy, could not have sustained itself eternally. Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living, reproducing if their reproductive system, vital structures, and organs hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 6 months ago
@yoda84345 This is true! In this theory the outward emission and inward absorption of these waves forms the process we see and feel as the passage or flow of Time.
nickharvey7 9 months ago
@yoda84345 You had me at hello.
shagster1970 9 months ago
The part about the mass of objects influencing time/space - does this go about explaining the Pioneer satellites anomaly??
shagster1970 1 year ago
@shagster1970 I know nothing about the Pioneer satellites anomaly, I must read up about this it sounds interesting! Thanks for your comments.
nickharvey7 1 year ago
@shagster1970
That's exactly what I'm thinking about sometimes, but like Nick says, I need to read more about it to see if that's a logical point of view
fermeister 1 year ago
I like the thought that the universe is made up of tiny particles (waves) that are bound by laws and systems and everything just follows this ad infinitum. However the universe has created higher life forms and so these higher life forms are the things that can influence the future/probability.
shagster1970 1 year ago
@shagster1970 Yes! But could these higher life forms only be able to influence the future and form their own probability because the atoms have bonded together? Whatever movement we make has to start off at the quantum level by collapsing the wave-particle duality of light. Therefore Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle can be the same uncertainty that the observer will have with any future event forming the passage of time in our everyday life.
nickharvey7 1 year ago
This is not "beyond Darwinism". It's not even remotely about biology. It's particle physics.
garouHH 1 year ago
@garouHH Yes! But what if the evolution of life had rules like the rule of Chess that were laid down by mathematic and geometry of physics? That gives us a geometrical therefore mathematical base for the evolution of life explaining why Nature never produces straight lines but an endless array of curves and spirals.
nickharvey7 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nickharvey7
> Nature never produces straight lines
Crystals.
garouHH 1 year ago
Thought provoking video. One thing that I wonder about when it comes to time in the universe is what about the accelerating expansion of the universe? is the expansion causing time to speed up at all or does it have no affect?
I like how you always compare a spiral in space to a seashell on Earth. The seashells do have that spiral kind of shape to them.
HaleyMary 1 year ago
@HaleyMary The Universe is made up of an infinite number of reference frames and each one will have its own proper time. Time will slow down for an observer accelerating towards the speed of light relative to an observer not accelerating, see the Twin Paradox. I have my doubts if we have an accelerating expansion of the universe there is no centre to our Universe it is only spacetime that is expanding within each individual reference frame relative to all the other frames of reference.
nickharvey7 1 year ago
@nickharvey7 Since both galaxies are moving away from each other at the same acceleration, they will have symmetrical rates of time. The spacetime between them will be relatively faster and faster the closer it gets to the midpoint. But light will travel at the same velocity no matter who is observing it or how fast they are moving. So we will see the other galaxy in its past state, but aging less and less until the sum of our accelerations equals light speed and then it will appear to be
feedtherich 1 year ago
frozen in time! However we can still observe ourselves moving further away from that location until we are actually moving at light speed, and then we won't see it at all. Instead we will be traveling backward in time and I have no idea what that will be like. But clearly everything else I've said is rock solid facts.
feedtherich 1 year ago
That is a wonderful video !
Tonight I get this one wonderfully, I think it is many way to get that point, Maths, quantum physic, creating, observing.
I think at some peoples who will love to see your site, I will it !
Thank you once more
didikh 1 year ago
@didikh Thanks for your kind comment!
nickharvey7 1 year ago
"Darwinism?" LOL! You occult befuddled nutcases are silly.
Desertphile 1 year ago
I am sorry but you draw conclusions from completely unrelated subjects.
nescius2 1 year ago
@nescius2 Everything is made of atoms and electric charge is an innate part of matter therefore how can anything be completely unrelated?
nickharvey7 1 year ago
free will = when, where, and HOW we collapse the wave ..nice
5ben11yax 1 year ago
@5ben11yax Yes! In this theory EMR works as a dynamic ether thought-out our whole Universe. All matter forms its own electromagnetic fields forming its own reference frame or spacetime. Each reference frame will have its own proper time relative to its position and momentum. Even the observer will do this forming their own future in space and time or reference frame.
nickharvey7 1 year ago
lol...i just left a channel comment about not having seen any vids by you, and "poof" here is one...
Elenkhos 1 year ago