same goes for the 1 dna scientist he has valid facts and proof that our dna is to complex for a single celled organism to carry the building blocks of our dna and our existense, hence your evolution, big bang theory, and nature are out of the question once again. Those other 9 experts are wrong and were to stupid to figure out what this 1 scientist figured out, thats why they give educated guesses and not legit facts. Again believe in man and there guesses, i will believe in God and facts
@DADof2MIXEDkids You do realize these "educated guesses" as you soo nicely point them out to be, are from obervation.. They and I could say we to :) b/c im a jerk like that, have not only just said oh it was a big bang the end:).. OOOH no sir/mam.. :) Look at this and tell me what you see... :)... Observation, is a key to "educated guess".. Obervation points to the big bang... Can we observe god? NOOOOOOOO... good talking to you :)
@captainawsomeoh13 you say your not going to kick 9 other experts to the curb because there experts right. What if 9 experts told you that a specific toothpaste protected you from tooth decay, but one expert came along with hard proof and evidence that it does than who would you believe, 9 experts who make eductaed guesses with no facts to back it up,or 1 expert who has the evidence and facts to back his findings up, I will favor that 1 expert everytime, 9 experts that guess i will not believe
@DADof2MIXEDkids Well sir if 9 experts told me this and other expert told me that i would say hell let me see which is right :)... I could do the same about your bible? So your bible tells you this but other bible say's this or that... there are more people out there that will try to prove or disprove ecudated guesses ;)... Go back to school...
Another thing that has come to my attention the latest research finding of a human ancestor named Ardi, proves that humans did not evolve from apes, but instead apes have evolved for humans, again evolution has proved your theory wrong again, God is real and again revealing to human guesses as wrong once again.
You all believe in man and science, great, you will then see how science is proving that God is real. Continue to believe in science because if that s what it it takes for you to believe in God continue to do it, Gods will it will be done, he will use science to make those who dont believe into believers, God is amazing, glory to God. Also read your bible and you will see and read exactly how everything it says is coming to pass right before our eyes, I would not waste my time if i didnt care
Regardless of what man finds, theorizes, discovers, guesses, thinks etc, God made it all, it is front of your eyes because it is here because God Made it, and you still doubt, you cannot get any more ignorant than that, I pray to God that he will forgive you all, that your lack of knowledge will not destroy you, and that you will seek God, study God,Get saved, and that Gods will for each and everyone of you will be done. Stop putting your faith in man and put it in God.
Have any of you non believers taken even 2 seconds to seek God for yourselves???? To try and see if there is actually a God or not? There is a God and I cannot believe how many people out there wont even take time to seek and find him. Before you go doubting and believing in men, i highly recommend you to take time to seek God, Once you do I am 100% confident you will be a believer, Becvause God exists. Unfortunately for most God could be standing in front of you and you will still not believe!
You can continue to doubt God and continue to worship and believe in man and believe what man has to say, go ahead, I am victorious, you can be too, I have already won, there is not even a competition, what you believe in God created it, therefore I win again, I again have already won. How irrigant and stubborn man is to believe in what God has created but not to believe in Him and give him credit, again my people are destroyed for lack of knowledge, you believe what a man says but not God.
Everyday that passes SCIENCE what you believe in, is proving the validity of the bible and God. It is proving that what the bible says is true. there was a beginning, a starting point, when you believe in the big bang, nature, science, you are believing in God, even if there was a big bang etc, God made it all. Funny how you believe in things that God made but still do not believe in God. God says in Hosea 4:6 my people are destroyed from lack of knowledge. You have more faith in your fellow man
Again, if we evolved from apes, Y havent all the apes evolved into man?? Y are there still apes present today? Why havent we seen an ape evolve into a man during our life on earth? Y are there so many animals out in this world who have not evolved but where created with the characteristics needed from the beginning to survive? Explain to me how an organism can change into an ape hiow does that ape take care of itself, does the momma ape come first or the baby ape, who took care of the baby ape?
So you are telling me that there was a big bang that created the earth, the univers etc, than out of nowhere some single celled organism from the ocean, crawled onto land and created apes, and from those apes humans evolved??? You out to be commited into a psychiatric ward for believing such a thing. There are so many facts that prove your big bang theory and evolution wrong and you continue to believe this garbage, how dare you! Lost souls I tell you. The devil is here to steal kill and destroy
@everyone, it truly amazes me how many lost souls there really is out in this world. To put all your trust into an imperfect mans theories is quite discusting. You believe all this because of mens theories? A Theory? Not even 100% fact, educated guess? Men are imperfect and have no clue what is really going on in this world, they make quesses and then people like you agree with them , having no evidence or facts, but guesses. There is a God and he created all of this, believing in man is sick!
I was watching a documentary from dinosaurs to us/today they got to the part about 50-60 thousand yrs' ago or so and> "The climate changed, wiping out the Saber toothed cats, then the Woolly mammoth were here" I was thinking WTF? can someone please explain this?
@8698gil also there is a dna scientist an atheist who while studying the human dna came across something very interested, he said that the dynamic sequence of our dna an the way it was made, could have not been created by, nature, evolution, the big bang theory, only from a far superior intellegence than our selves, this scientist is now a christian. There is a God people, seek him for yourself and you will find him, quit believing in these imperfect human scientists and their low IQ theories
@DADof2MIXEDkids ...This comment actually makes me a bit mad. One "DNA" scientist said something, so what! 9 out of 10 dentists recommend my toothpaste. I'm not going to kick 9 experts to the curb because one isn't good at doing his job! I recommend reading up on abiogenesis and see what MOST other experts have to say. As for the, "low IQ theories:" humanity gets to live a very comfortable life as a result of, "low IQ theories." If you don't like it, find a cave and some flint.
@8698gil,last 3 things the big bang theory is a crock, the elements needed to create it could not sustain life as we know it, impossible, not enough elements sorry, there also has to be a grown man and woman to start the human race off like adam and eve, or the human race would not exist, oh i see we came from the ocean and evolved into a baby primate, that baby primate took care of itself and mated with itself and continued this for millions of years until we have what we have today Yeah right!
@DADof2MIXEDkids Hate to break it to you, but all humans are considered to be primates and apes for that matter. As for the elements...well...when you take two atoms and smush them together under tremendous force, they can fuse to create a new element. This is called fusion. Most of our elements have been created naturally while most of the man-made ones are highly radioactive and don't last very long. As for the origins of life, that field is called abiogenesis.
@DADof2MIXEDkids And again, the big bang is NOT a crock. Anybody who tells you otherwise probably has little to know understanding about the theory. Scientists can actually recreate the few precious microseconds after it took place. Scientists are currently researching more into this in the huge hardon collider in the UK.
@DADof2MIXEDkids And again, the big bang is NOT a crock. Anybody who tells you otherwise probably has little to know understanding about the theory. Scientists can actually recreate the few precious microseconds after it took place. Scientists are currently researching more into this in the huge hardon collider in the UK.
@8698gil also if we evolved fom primates, why are there still primates?? y havent they all evolved into man?? y havent any of these primates evolved into men since the time us humans have been around to witness it?? Y arent we going through the same evolution change right now as we speak?? y havvent we been born apes and evolve into humans, it does not make any sense my friend, there are still primates and humans and they are seperate species, closely related but did not evolve fom them sorry
@DADof2MIXEDkids We evolved from a common ancestor. This can easily tracked through our DNA and through the fossil record. Somewhere in the evolutionary tree, 2 of our genes fussed together and here we are. This is a VERY lamin way of putting it. I'll quote the common quote and say that Americans came from Europe yet there's still Europeans. All of humanity came from Africa yet there's still people who live there.
@8698gilAn example, a giraffe did not evolve over millions of years to obtain the characteristics needed to survive, it was created in the beginning with them, they have a special shut off valve in their neck that shuts the blood flow to their brains when the bend over for a drink of water, with out this shut off valve they would pass out and be eaten immediately, leaving the species to vanish, to be extinct. your evolution theory is wrong.
@DADof2MIXEDkids Evolutionary theory is not wrong because you have an assertion and a clear lack of understanding about it. Again, there is plenty of evidence, this video shows off just some, that supports it. I suggest looking up the evolution of the giraffe. The Dover Evolution vs. Creationism documentary done by NOVA has some great dialog about this line of thinking. It's a great watch if you have the time for it.
@8698gil There is a God! We werent created by a big bang theory nor evolution, if anyone as yourself believes in these theories you must be off your rocker! evoltionists have found that there are a surprising number of animals that have not evolved but were created from the beginning to have the genetic makeup to needed to survive, if they werent created with these characteristics they would have died off along time ago.They didnt evolve these traits over millions of years or they would not live
@DADof2MIXEDkids Sorry to thread jack, but I couldn't resist. For starters, how the universe got here has no impact or relation to how animals evolved. They are two completely sciences. But while we're talking about big bang, we have models, a lot of good Einstein math, and other evidence to support the theory. Two scientists even won the Nobel Prize for their discovery of background radiation to support the theory in 1978.
@DADof2MIXEDkids Just wanna ask...which god? Thor? Allah? Zeus? That...elephant thing in India who's name I just forgot :/
To claim that one of those exists, by default, says that most of the other gods don't. Each of these different gods in today's world are all thought to be the true god. Who's right? Each follower claims the same dogma and has supernatural claims about their god. My simple answer is a "god" is the spackle used to fill in the gaps of misunderstanding.
hey hey hey.... wait a minute. they said we evolved from fish, to monkeys, to humans, if that's so then why did'nt the cycle continue for each species? why did'nt all the fish evolve into land animals. why did'nt all the monkeys evolve into humans? come on scientists you've got alot of explaining to do. i think fish, and monkeys should be extinct if it was all evolution
And there are no scientists who don't believe in evolution. At least, no respected scientists. Putting on a lab coat does not make one a scientist. Getting a phony degree from an unaccredited bible college that doesn't count means absolutely nothing in the real world.
You fundies are the absolutely worst. Such simpletons. If anyone really believes that its even remotely plausible that there is an invisible being in the sky who created everything 6000 years ago they are incredibly stupid and ignorant. Not to mention arrogant. We are not special, we are just another species among millions. A little more intelligent, but that's all. You guys actually think you're so vastly important that you're never going to die.
@8698gil Homochirality is a disaster for naturalistic origins. All amino acids in proteins are 'LEFT-handed', while all sugars in DNA and RNA, and in the metabolic pathways, are 'RIGHT-handed'. Chirality!
A 50/50 mixture of left- and right-handed forms is called a racemate or racemic mixture!!. Which life can't use!! Its what we see in nature and in labs!
Life never came about by time chance natural processes! IMPOSSIBLE!!!
not evidence for evolution. evidence that animals have skulls. evolution must be proven genetically not forensically... similar bone structure is not good enough for science. dogs and cats are similar if one finds their skeletons intermingled in the field, they are obviously not genetially related. christians are rather more sophisticated than you give us credit for. prove evolution genetically and i'll be impressed. forensics is for detectives...
@cwross1976 You should read about the human genome project. It showed that humans and chimps share roughly 98% of the same Genetic sequence. In response to calling my massive scientific community statement "mob-rule", these scientists devote their entire lives to finding, studying, and debating the implications of each fossil. This is not merely the will of the majority, this is an accumulation of decades of careful study and discussion. Most agree the world is round, is that mob-rule too?
Looking at fossils for nearly 50 years leaves me wondering why there's a massive lack of what we should be finding if everything evolved from a "simple" cell. All the changes that would have had to happen as creatures evolved should have left behind MOST of the fossils that that we find,, but it's hard to find any that show the ever changing history of evolution. Or am I just stupid???
@Rob187ok No, you aren't stupid to notice the missing fossils. You are just seeing the obvious & admitting it. Here are Qs creationists asks - just a very, very few of them - regarding the so called fossil evidence for evolution: How come we were told that fins turned into feet, fish into tetrapods, scales into feathers and tetrapods turned into birds when tons & billiions of fossils only show 100% of each & no inbetweeners? How can they tell what a fossil's descendants reproduced? Cont.
@LoricaLady ,, Thank you for your comment.which was very helpful. I found myself questioning what is clearly obvious,,,, because I just don't get how so many experts and great minds can be so lacking in simple common sense? It almost looks as if folk have lost the power to reason when it comes to this subject. It's all a little bit strange to say the least.
@Rob187ok I have deleted 2 of my comments as I was typing in haste and thinking you were a different poster. Sorry. I'm not sure where you are coming from though. You already have been thinking for yourself by questioning what you have been taught for so long. But, if the evidence leads away from that - even in a different direction - do you think its ok to follow the data & not the consensus of "all those scientists"? Just curious.
@LoricaLady,, nearly 50 years of being interested in fossils has shown me just how lacking the records are. I can see for myself and I can think for myself,,, and there's nothing more than a whole load of guessing to support what is taken as fact by those who just like the idea of all life evolving from a single living reproducing cell that fell together. That idea assumes much and is rigged to rule out an Almighty Creator, even though it's nothing but biased spiritless speculation.
@Rob187ok Yeal it's sad how desperately some people like to believe they are the product of an uncaring primal pond & are the great etc. grandbabies of apes. But then it's kind of funny too how mad they get when you try to show them that's just not so.
@Rob187ok You know, though, I used to be the same way. I bought evolution hook, line & sinker for a long time. And no, I did not want to humble myself to anyone. If there was hope for me there is hope for some of them! :-)
@LoricaLady ,,Too right,,, even some hard core scientists are realising that the more they look the less they understand,,, and God is starting to make more sense. Truth is always there waiting for people to discover it,, and when all else fails truth stands tall..
@Rob187ok Cont. For ex. they find a little fossils called Ida & tell you that's your great, great etc. grammaw. Based on? Based on magical thinking that tells us they know how its invisible descendants' invisible descendnats reproduced and connected to us via invisible dots. (How do you tell a "missing" link from a never existed one?) Check out Dr. Colin Patterson's quotes, an evolutionist who admitted the truth: there is "not one water tight case" for a transitional form. Cont.
@Rob187ok Cont. ALL of evo theory & literature is like that. They present pure speculation as if it were actual evidence and call it science. They usually toss in a lot of logical fallacies, for ex. Correlation Does Not Imply Causation (Ida looking monkey-like doesn't mean she led to you), Fallacy of the Single Cause (refusal to look at any explanation other than evo and going to court to stop anyone else from doing so either) and the Incomplete Comparison Fallacy, etc. Pure sophistry & b.s.
@tnafguy You cited one scientist whose work has been largely discredited by a massive scientific community. Humans have not been shown to exist for millions of years. In fact, modern apes as we know them hardly even existed 10 million years ago. You can say that an entire scientific community is lying to us, but then how can we prove Cremo is better than them. You can't! Please, I beg you to show me one picture of human evidence 100 million years old. I'd love for the Flintstones to be true!
@tnafguy There's just so much incorrect with what you're saying I'm not sure whether to be offended or disappointed. Suggesting people who believe in evolution are pagans is ridiculous. Even the Pope acknowledges that the evidence is undeniable. Last I checked Catholicism is the original form of Christianity. To expect that million year old bones survive completely intact is so unrealistic. It's like saying "I think the earth is flat, and I won't be convinced unless NASA shoots me into orbit".
@tennisdrums93 , umm? "Last I checked Catholicism is the original form of Christianity" the Romans were notorious for incorporating every religion and god into their culture, last time I checked. including Christians religion.
@tnafguy Natural selection is one of the primary forces behind evolution. All species naturally have inheritable variation, and among those varieties some will inherently be favored by the environment around them. Those that have features that are favorable to the environment will live longer and reproduce more often, passing those traits on to the next generation. Over many generations (in this case several MILLION YEARS) these favorable traits will compound and become more and more pronounced.
@tnafguy You could say ANYTHING is fake, but that doesn't make it true. The evidence that these aren't fakes comes from various fields of science, including chemistry and geology. Unless you discredit all science as incorrect, these will have to be accepted as real. Secondly, saying these are another type of human is exactly what is being argued! They are proto-humans, VERY different from apes as I've shown, but not quite human. These are older species of humans ancestral to us that evolved.
@tnafguy None of these skull are ape-like enough to be chimps or gorillas. The foramen magnum in these skulls (That hole where the neck connects to the head) faces DOWNWARD. In apes it faces backwards because they are quadrapeds. The cranial capacity of these skulls are significantly larger than that of any other apes, some have almost twice that amount. These skulls aren't apes, I've seen these skulls (and moldings) in person (have you?). The differences between them and apes are unmistakable.
@tnafguy Ummm... have you ever studied Apes or Monkeys? The fact that you'd even think any of these are "monkeys" is ridiculous if you actually knew the features of a monkey. And if these are gorillas or chimpanzees, they are absolute freaks! Their brains are enormous, their brow lines are almost invisible, their canines are dramatically reduced, and their arrangement suggests they walk fully upright. None of these features are consistent with apes, in fact they match human traits perfectly!
I'd like to send you a picture of what most would believe is a 1982 Olds Cutlass made by GM. but don't be deceived- it is really a rare specimen of what must have taken BILLIONS of years to spontaneously assemble by itself without any intelligent guidance. USE YOUR COMMON SENSE, MAN!
P.S. The car is much less complex than a single cell.
Of course they look like ape skulls! You are seeing our ape ancestors. Watch the video again, notice how the forehead and jaw converge to human-like, also brain gets bigger. We ARE apes.
i wonder why 17 people disliked this video. I guess truth is kinda scary, since there is no point in trying to prove fossils are fake... they just hate
@tnafguy Right, you are so much smarter than biologists, geologists, chemists, and paleontologists. Thanks for all of your bible fed scientific perspective.
Hey, kiddos, want to see a fairy tale that adults really believe? Google whale evolution and go watch a 7 minutes video on the PBS web site that shows how an ancient 200 pound wolf searched for food along the beach, wander out into the surf, and morphed (evolved) into a 100 ton whale. There is nothing scientific about it, but nonetheless, this is the fairy tale that some adults really believe! Especially comical are the nostrils migrating to the top of the head to become a blow hole!
Bye bye religion. You have nothing more to offer Homo sapein except suffering, death, child rape, anguish and lies. It wasnt fun having you control my species but now you cower in the dark corners of superstition and intermingle only with the weak of intellect, the failed, the fallen sub humans that pollute the great ape population. We no longer buy into the dead Jew zombie carpenter from the bible of death or the bearded pedophile rapist of children from the koran of suicide bombings.
@mironyuk Like the Pope, National Council of Churches USA including methodists, anglicans, Episcopalian, Lutherans, all 144 of the graduate programs available for evolutionary biology, national geographic, animal planet, history channel, all biologists, all geneticists, all especially paleontologists, Princeton, Harvard, Cambridge all have evolutionary biology departments. Smithsonian museum and all other reputable museums around the world. Sorry, it seems you aren't living in reality
If evolution is correct why are species distinct from each other with no evidence that they gradually evolved to other kind of species. Ever since apes are still apes, crocs are still crocs. Neandertals never interacted with modern man. Mutations are actually genetic defects. If you cross breed horse and donkey you will get a sterile mule. Fossils of lizards 250 million yrs ago indicated that they never evolved at all.
@daogdaog Well, first off you don't understand evolution and how population dynamics works and you likely don't know how many species of "Crocs" "apes" or hominids there were. And don't say you understand it either. I suggest you go look it up before you throw out all these creationist assumptions. Churches all around put creationism down and all scientific organizations condemn it because its contrary to reality. You don't understand evolution and you aren't as smart as a researcher
@daogdaog And horse and donkey hybrid is infertile for evolutionary purposes. And there are more hybrids that can have children. Type in "fertile hybrids" in google and your answers will come. Also Neanderthals were a separate species that branched off from chimp-human-neanderthal ancestor. You probably don't understand this, so like I said, look up "how evolution works" before you give me a response. Take at least 30 minutes trying to find out, if u don't find answers. I will help you
@daogdaog Look up evolution in wikipedia. And while you're at it, have a look at the *fact of evolution* chapter there. There are very good reasons why virtually nobody in science doubts evolution.: )
@dukeznay No amount of evolutionists idea will ever change the mere fact that species never evolved at all. We see forms today of lizards, shrimps, crocs similar to those fossilized millions of years ago
some even prior to the existence of dinos like the horse shoe crabs. Evolution theory is nothing but unverified assumptions after assumptions
@MW2Addiction Let us see who is really an idiot here. Since around 100 million fossils have been unearthed, provide a list of four legged animals with short necks that gradually evolved into a giraffe. Since the changes were incremental according to Darwin, there should be thousands of
those transistional animals before they transform into a giraffe.
Short necked animals with highly developed long antlers used for
protection had to undergo reverse evolution to make those antlers short.
@daogdaog en.wikipedia . org/wiki/OkapiWe (Take out the spaces)
Anyways, thats a perfect example of a short necked giraffe. Also even if we didn't have any fossils for intermediate-length necks it wouldn't mean that the evolution of the long neck did not happen or was not a gradual process. It could simply have evolved in a small population of animals living in an area where dead animals didn't get fossilized.
@MW2Addiction So after 100 millions fossils unearthed, you have no watertight evidence to show that there was a gradual changes in the neck of animals prior to transforming to a giraffe. Just a mere speculation like how Darwin described it. What happened to the long and highly developed antlers of short necked animals prior to okapi? The okapi themselves should have starved and died if Darwin story is true. Female giraffes are shorter on average by a meter should have died too.
@daogdaog Oh my... I cannot even begin to fathom how much errors you have in your logic. This is pitiful that we have ignorant people like you now a days with straw man arguments and illogical claims from pure ignorance. There are plenty of fossils and there's a WHOLE BOOK written just about the evolution of giraffes. Search it, educate your self.
@MW2Addiction Plenty of fossils and whole book? try to list say 10 fossils of animals showing gradual changes before those animals transformed into a giraffe. Let us examine them one by one. Many biolgists are now suggesting that Darwin was wrong about the evolution of giraffes. They say it must be sexual selection not the way Darwin described it. So there is no agreement among the scientific community about the evolution of a giraffe.
The fossil record for the giraffe isn't as complete as other lineages, but there are some good books covering the specimens. 1 I suggest is The Evolution of Artlodactyls - Prothero. The modern Okapi is more typical of the group & ancestrally you're looking at specimens like Bohlinia,, Palaetragus, Cathumeryx.
@MW2Addiction Oh man, Thanks for the big 7 minute long belly laugh!! I've seen this video dozens of times already, and it's nothing but a bunch of Human, Ape, Monkey, and gorilla skulls and that's it. Where's the rest of ALL of those skulls, and the skeletal system that should be with it? Anybody can take a pile of bones and lay them out on a table in the form of a skeleton and call it whatever they want, that doesn't make it a transitional fossil. It's called DREAMING and WISHFUL THINKING!!
@ironman197268 Wow I cant believe theres ignorant people like you now a days. I give you empirical data and evidence from real fossils that people have found and you call it a dream? Are you this fucking arrogant?
No wonder creationist like you are called idiots over and over again. Your IQ is lower than a fucking mentally retarded dogs IQ. Thats how ignorant and unintelligent you are.
You give me no proof to support your claims and I give you proof to support my claims.
@MW2Addiction The more you keep wishing me to be so ignorrant, the smarter it makes me look. Your little analogy about my IQ and a retarted dogs IQ is evidence of that, because you have no idea what my IQ is, let alone a retaded dogs, you're just making more assumptions, aka "DREAMING" You know I bet they didn't cabon date those skulls, cause if the did they would find traces of C14 in them, like they find in 600 million year old diamonds because NOTHING in this universe is millions of years old
@ironman197268 Before you come here and call your self smart and call me dumb, at least check your spelling. You fail to even comprehend the English language let a lone write it. Its ok my little ape-descendant your willfully ignorant, that's why you cant even understand my arguments. The amount of evidence that supports a old Earth is so much that only IGNORANT people deny it. And who here is denying it? Oh yeah! Thats right YOU!
Good luck being an uneducated idiot for the rest of your life.
@MW2Addiction I didn't call you dumb, and I didn't call me smart, and this isn't a spelling contest DING DONG!! You're quite the hypocrite when you go clowning somebodies spelling when you used to use the word "proofs" out of context. OK, if this Earth is so old, why is C14 found inside of 600 million year old diamonds Jenius?
@ironman197268 Coal (and subsequently diamonds) often has uranium deposited along with it. This uranium frequently contaminates the coal (and also subsequently diamonds) for radiation readings. It is a much different process from merely taking a piece of wood or cloth, cleaning it, and carbonizing it in a lab and then taking C14 readings. It is more accurate with regard to coal (and diamond) deposits to check uranium-lead isotope ratios.
@ironman197268 I also dont know who told you such lies, cause C14 is not found in diamonds. Please cite your sources because if not It didn't happen. And even if it did, I already gave you a valid explanation as to what could have happened.
Either way though, C14 is NEVER found in diamonds. Whoever told you this is a liar. So please, give me the source and then maybe I will believe you.
@MW2Addiction C14 is most certainly found in diamonds, you are one of the very few evilutionists that deny this claim. Here's a good video that will sum it all up for you, enjoy...
@ironman197268 Coal (and subsequently diamonds) often has uranium deposited along with it. This uranium frequently contaminates the coal (and also subsequently diamonds) for radiation readings. It is a much different process from merely taking a piece of wood or cloth, cleaning it, and carbonizing it in a lab and then taking C14 readings. It is more accurate with regard to coal (and diamond) deposits to check uranium-lead isotope ratios.
Theres also many other reasons. You need to read a book.
@MW2Addiction Well then obviously scientists have taken diamonds and contaminated them with C14 to show that underground uranium can cause a chemical reaction to impregnate a diamond with just a little bit of C14 right? Do you know how RARE underground uranium is? This contamination would have had to have happened around 200,000 years ago to show the amounts seen today right?. Is this contamination process continual, if so, how and why?
@ironman197268 Ok seems like you want me to answer a lot of questions. I have found the perfect video that should answer your question on C14 in diamonds.
youtube. com /watch?v=T-o7ArSeSOY (Take out the spaces)
@MW2Addiction Oh man, what another big laugh!! Good old greeneto. That video is nothing but an example of what you have all ready told me, in the form of a person saying the words. Where is his results of contaminating a diamond with C14, from experiments of his own?
@odinata Made up evilutionary dreams are not facts, it's wishful thinking. The Biblical account fits the reality that we live in better than all the 100s of excuses science comes up with to and explain their wacky religion.
@odinata Do you really believe that scientist are going to announce to the world that they are wrong, and the creationists are right? Of coarse not, they're going to continue to work on coming up with excuses to back their ridiculous claims.
@odinata Hes an idiot. Ironman is one of the most illogical human beings ever. Hes ignorant, refutes evidence, and then covers his ears and goes LALALALAL when you tell him the truth.
@odinata I'm not trying to replace science with anything. Evolution is not science because there is nothing in the world that's observable about it, evilutionists WISHES there is but, there isn't. Is this what you call painful?
@odinata Hes to ignorant to see that. When you give him evidence and stump his illogical arguments he says SATAN DID IT! SATAN DID IT! Lol what a dreamer.
@MW2Addiction Man you keep giving me so much empirical evidence of your WISHES. I said satan did it ONE time throughout this entire debate, but you said, I said it TWICE. Then you give me evidence of your hypocrisy when you call me a dreamer... I know, I'm just a brainless retard.
@ironman197268 You are such a dreamer lmao. Anybody in those times were extremely religious and thought there had to be some magical flying man that created all this. Thats how he knew. He didn't not shit about logic and reason though. He had no idea what an atom was. What a cell was. What proton was, electron, and billions of other things scientist have discovered. You are so ignorant to the point where your delusional.
@MW2Addiction Moses may have not known what an atom was, but Paul certainly did, or at least he wrote down something in The Bible that is beyond a coincidence, that is clearly discribing quantum theory.
@odinata You wish I don't know what an atom is, you're the one that doesn't know what it is, otherwise you could help you LOSER friend MEGA WISHER addicted 2, come up with an EXCUSE, about Hebrews 11:3 HAAAHAAAA!!!!
@ironman197268 "By faith we understand that the universe was created by the word of God, so that what is seen was not made out of things that are visible."
OH MY GOSHHHH! YOU JUST OPENED MY MIND! THIS IS SO TRUE!!! OH MY GOD! GOD ALMIGHTY THE SPIRIT OF LORD JUST HIT ME!
Lol your retarded. This doesn't proof that he knew that the universe was created out of things we dont see. This just proves that people back then believed in INVISIBLE gods and a whole bunch of other witch crafts and myths.
@MW2Addiction Yeah, you WISH that's what it said. How do you get "GODS"(Plural) out of,"The word of GOD?"(singular) How is that verse speaking of more than ONE GOD?
@ironman197268 "I know, I'm just a brainless retard." Wow you finally got something right, congratulations.
Anyways, you still fail to provide any evidence that proves evolution is wrong. You know why? Cause evolution has OVERWHELMING amounts of evidence that supports it. So much that it is a PROVEN FACT. You claim we cant see evolution happen yet we HAVE. Scientist have seen evolution happen in bacteria and in organisms with short life spans. Your an illogical dumb ass.
@MW2Addiction Hey man, in order for trees to reproduce, the male and female ones have to pollinate, sometimes there too far apart to do so, and require certain insects to make this happen for them. So... what came first, INSECTS, or trees?
@ironman197268 Your question should be about flowers and bees not vice versa. The bee and the flower evolved together. A clearer question is, which came first, the pollinating insect or the flower. Given this question the answer is the flower. The reasons being as follows:
1) there are wind pollinated flowers that do not require insect vectors.
2) prior to the existence of flowers, any insects could not have been "pollinating" for the simple reason there would be nothing for them to pollinate.
@ironman197268 Haha its funny and ironic cause this is what creationist do. They are constantly being proven wrong over and over again by logical thinking and evidence but they never say, "The scientist are right and we are wrong." They keep on lying and spouting bullshit out of their mouths like you.
@ironman197268 You deluded piece of shit. Im sorry but you are the most arrogant ignorant utterly retarded human being I have yet to ever speak to in my life. You are a living, breathing proof of the failure of the United States School system. I seriously cannot believe someone so arrogant like you could make such extraordinary claims and have no evidence to back it up. Your the one who is wishful thinking matter fact YOUR WORSE than that. Your DELUSIONAL.
@ironman197268 Awwww are you butt hurt cause he destroyed the creationist argument? Aww its okay. You should really consider being an evolutionist. Move towards the truth, not the lies. :)
@MW2Addiction Man you better hope you don't ever find a genie's lamp, cause you'll burn through your 3 wishes faster than a monkey taking a dump on himself. Speaking of monkeys, if they are our cousins then why can we live so much longer than they can? They would've had the same genetic opportunities that we did. And why are we so much more advanced than they are?
@ironman197268 LOL! I thought you knew about evolution? You always claimed that you knew more about evolution than I did. So why are you coming up with these questions... obviously cause you dont know the answers to. And the questions that you are asking, sadly are the easiest questions of all time. So easy that I sometimes wonder if you have a brain.
@MW2Addiction I know about the lie that it is. I ask these questions because I know there is no real answer for them, other than the pathetic made up answers. If you know all about it, and claim it to be such a fact, then you would immediately answers those questions effortlessly, instead of trying boost your self esteem with phony flattery, like wondering whether or not I have a brain. Does that MW in your username stand for Massive Wisher, and that's what you're addicted to?
@ironman197268 Oh really? I have answered EVERY single one of your questions you silly ape. Get the fuck out of here with your delusional and creationist bull shit. You have yet to even put up a challenge against me. There is no VALID proof that disproves evolution at all. Matter fact there is evidence that proves evolution to be a fact! Your to fucking stupid and blind to see it. Your uneducated therefore you dont know shit about evolution. And I have my evidence to back up these claims.
@MW2Addiction Wow, A 1500 character long wish, that's pretty impressive. Why is the woodpecker so much different than other birds? It's feet, it's tongue that goes through the back of it's head and nose, then can stick out of it's beak several inches? What about the platypus? Hey what came first, bees or trees? I bet you will ignore all of this, and please don't go telling me to do some research dumbass, cause you should have an arsenal of answers to these questions ready to fire at will!!
Its funny how you dont even know that we already have explanations to everything that your asking. This proves my point that you fail to even understand how to use a computer to do research. You also clearly fail at going to school.
@ironman197268 "Speaking of monkeys, if they are our cousins then why can we live so much longer than they can?"
You CONSTANTLY FAIL to even realize the basic knowledge of EVOLUTION. Evolution NEVER states that monkeys are our closest ancestor or cousin. If you cant even understand the basic principles of evolution, that really shows the LACK of knowledge you have on evolution to begin with. It seriously lowers your credibility, over and over again.
same goes for the 1 dna scientist he has valid facts and proof that our dna is to complex for a single celled organism to carry the building blocks of our dna and our existense, hence your evolution, big bang theory, and nature are out of the question once again. Those other 9 experts are wrong and were to stupid to figure out what this 1 scientist figured out, thats why they give educated guesses and not legit facts. Again believe in man and there guesses, i will believe in God and facts
DADof2MIXEDkids 1 month ago
@DADof2MIXEDkids
"i will believe in God and facts"
LOL let me geuiss you pretend the bible is true
Even tho every scientific field proves the bible wrong?
Every great universoty teaches science that disprove the bible?
No great university thinks the ark.f/flood fairy tale is true?
6000 year old earth? LOL FAIL!
gorilla199uncensored 4 weeks ago
@DADof2MIXEDkids You do realize these "educated guesses" as you soo nicely point them out to be, are from obervation.. They and I could say we to :) b/c im a jerk like that, have not only just said oh it was a big bang the end:).. OOOH no sir/mam.. :) Look at this and tell me what you see... :)... Observation, is a key to "educated guess".. Obervation points to the big bang... Can we observe god? NOOOOOOOO... good talking to you :)
curemymind 3 weeks ago
@captainawsomeoh13 you say your not going to kick 9 other experts to the curb because there experts right. What if 9 experts told you that a specific toothpaste protected you from tooth decay, but one expert came along with hard proof and evidence that it does than who would you believe, 9 experts who make eductaed guesses with no facts to back it up,or 1 expert who has the evidence and facts to back his findings up, I will favor that 1 expert everytime, 9 experts that guess i will not believe
DADof2MIXEDkids 1 month ago
@DADof2MIXEDkids Well sir if 9 experts told me this and other expert told me that i would say hell let me see which is right :)... I could do the same about your bible? So your bible tells you this but other bible say's this or that... there are more people out there that will try to prove or disprove ecudated guesses ;)... Go back to school...
curemymind 3 weeks ago
Another thing that has come to my attention the latest research finding of a human ancestor named Ardi, proves that humans did not evolve from apes, but instead apes have evolved for humans, again evolution has proved your theory wrong again, God is real and again revealing to human guesses as wrong once again.
DADof2MIXEDkids 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DADof2MIXEDkids
"Ardi, proves that humans did not evolve from apes"
LOL didnt see him win the nobel prize or even publish anything.
U think apes evolved from humans? in less than 6000 years! LOL
BTW ERVs easily disprove the crap ardi says! SORRY!
gorilla199uncensored 4 weeks ago
You all believe in man and science, great, you will then see how science is proving that God is real. Continue to believe in science because if that s what it it takes for you to believe in God continue to do it, Gods will it will be done, he will use science to make those who dont believe into believers, God is amazing, glory to God. Also read your bible and you will see and read exactly how everything it says is coming to pass right before our eyes, I would not waste my time if i didnt care
DADof2MIXEDkids 1 month ago
Regardless of what man finds, theorizes, discovers, guesses, thinks etc, God made it all, it is front of your eyes because it is here because God Made it, and you still doubt, you cannot get any more ignorant than that, I pray to God that he will forgive you all, that your lack of knowledge will not destroy you, and that you will seek God, study God,Get saved, and that Gods will for each and everyone of you will be done. Stop putting your faith in man and put it in God.
DADof2MIXEDkids 1 month ago
Have any of you non believers taken even 2 seconds to seek God for yourselves???? To try and see if there is actually a God or not? There is a God and I cannot believe how many people out there wont even take time to seek and find him. Before you go doubting and believing in men, i highly recommend you to take time to seek God, Once you do I am 100% confident you will be a believer, Becvause God exists. Unfortunately for most God could be standing in front of you and you will still not believe!
DADof2MIXEDkids 1 month ago
@DADof2MIXEDkids
POrovide evidence
Your god exits
it did it
You wont as theres none!
gorilla199uncensored 4 weeks ago
You can continue to doubt God and continue to worship and believe in man and believe what man has to say, go ahead, I am victorious, you can be too, I have already won, there is not even a competition, what you believe in God created it, therefore I win again, I again have already won. How irrigant and stubborn man is to believe in what God has created but not to believe in Him and give him credit, again my people are destroyed for lack of knowledge, you believe what a man says but not God.
DADof2MIXEDkids 1 month ago
Everyday that passes SCIENCE what you believe in, is proving the validity of the bible and God. It is proving that what the bible says is true. there was a beginning, a starting point, when you believe in the big bang, nature, science, you are believing in God, even if there was a big bang etc, God made it all. Funny how you believe in things that God made but still do not believe in God. God says in Hosea 4:6 my people are destroyed from lack of knowledge. You have more faith in your fellow man
DADof2MIXEDkids 1 month ago
Again, if we evolved from apes, Y havent all the apes evolved into man?? Y are there still apes present today? Why havent we seen an ape evolve into a man during our life on earth? Y are there so many animals out in this world who have not evolved but where created with the characteristics needed from the beginning to survive? Explain to me how an organism can change into an ape hiow does that ape take care of itself, does the momma ape come first or the baby ape, who took care of the baby ape?
DADof2MIXEDkids 1 month ago
So you are telling me that there was a big bang that created the earth, the univers etc, than out of nowhere some single celled organism from the ocean, crawled onto land and created apes, and from those apes humans evolved??? You out to be commited into a psychiatric ward for believing such a thing. There are so many facts that prove your big bang theory and evolution wrong and you continue to believe this garbage, how dare you! Lost souls I tell you. The devil is here to steal kill and destroy
DADof2MIXEDkids 1 month ago
@everyone, it truly amazes me how many lost souls there really is out in this world. To put all your trust into an imperfect mans theories is quite discusting. You believe all this because of mens theories? A Theory? Not even 100% fact, educated guess? Men are imperfect and have no clue what is really going on in this world, they make quesses and then people like you agree with them , having no evidence or facts, but guesses. There is a God and he created all of this, believing in man is sick!
DADof2MIXEDkids 1 month ago
I was watching a documentary from dinosaurs to us/today they got to the part about 50-60 thousand yrs' ago or so and> "The climate changed, wiping out the Saber toothed cats, then the Woolly mammoth were here" I was thinking WTF? can someone please explain this?
SPAGHETTIMONSTER1 1 month ago
@8698gil also there is a dna scientist an atheist who while studying the human dna came across something very interested, he said that the dynamic sequence of our dna an the way it was made, could have not been created by, nature, evolution, the big bang theory, only from a far superior intellegence than our selves, this scientist is now a christian. There is a God people, seek him for yourself and you will find him, quit believing in these imperfect human scientists and their low IQ theories
DADof2MIXEDkids 1 month ago
@DADof2MIXEDkids ...This comment actually makes me a bit mad. One "DNA" scientist said something, so what! 9 out of 10 dentists recommend my toothpaste. I'm not going to kick 9 experts to the curb because one isn't good at doing his job! I recommend reading up on abiogenesis and see what MOST other experts have to say. As for the, "low IQ theories:" humanity gets to live a very comfortable life as a result of, "low IQ theories." If you don't like it, find a cave and some flint.
CaptainAwesomeoh13 1 month ago in playlist More videos from agentorange20
@8698gil,last 3 things the big bang theory is a crock, the elements needed to create it could not sustain life as we know it, impossible, not enough elements sorry, there also has to be a grown man and woman to start the human race off like adam and eve, or the human race would not exist, oh i see we came from the ocean and evolved into a baby primate, that baby primate took care of itself and mated with itself and continued this for millions of years until we have what we have today Yeah right!
DADof2MIXEDkids 1 month ago
@DADof2MIXEDkids Hate to break it to you, but all humans are considered to be primates and apes for that matter. As for the elements...well...when you take two atoms and smush them together under tremendous force, they can fuse to create a new element. This is called fusion. Most of our elements have been created naturally while most of the man-made ones are highly radioactive and don't last very long. As for the origins of life, that field is called abiogenesis.
CaptainAwesomeoh13 1 month ago in playlist More videos from agentorange20
@DADof2MIXEDkids And again, the big bang is NOT a crock. Anybody who tells you otherwise probably has little to know understanding about the theory. Scientists can actually recreate the few precious microseconds after it took place. Scientists are currently researching more into this in the huge hardon collider in the UK.
CaptainAwesomeoh13 1 month ago in playlist More videos from agentorange20
This has been flagged as spam show
@DADof2MIXEDkids And again, the big bang is NOT a crock. Anybody who tells you otherwise probably has little to know understanding about the theory. Scientists can actually recreate the few precious microseconds after it took place. Scientists are currently researching more into this in the huge hardon collider in the UK.
CaptainAwesomeoh13 1 month ago in playlist More videos from agentorange20
@8698gil also if we evolved fom primates, why are there still primates?? y havent they all evolved into man?? y havent any of these primates evolved into men since the time us humans have been around to witness it?? Y arent we going through the same evolution change right now as we speak?? y havvent we been born apes and evolve into humans, it does not make any sense my friend, there are still primates and humans and they are seperate species, closely related but did not evolve fom them sorry
DADof2MIXEDkids 1 month ago
@DADof2MIXEDkids We evolved from a common ancestor. This can easily tracked through our DNA and through the fossil record. Somewhere in the evolutionary tree, 2 of our genes fussed together and here we are. This is a VERY lamin way of putting it. I'll quote the common quote and say that Americans came from Europe yet there's still Europeans. All of humanity came from Africa yet there's still people who live there.
CaptainAwesomeoh13 1 month ago in playlist More videos from agentorange20
@8698gilAn example, a giraffe did not evolve over millions of years to obtain the characteristics needed to survive, it was created in the beginning with them, they have a special shut off valve in their neck that shuts the blood flow to their brains when the bend over for a drink of water, with out this shut off valve they would pass out and be eaten immediately, leaving the species to vanish, to be extinct. your evolution theory is wrong.
DADof2MIXEDkids 1 month ago
@DADof2MIXEDkids Evolutionary theory is not wrong because you have an assertion and a clear lack of understanding about it. Again, there is plenty of evidence, this video shows off just some, that supports it. I suggest looking up the evolution of the giraffe. The Dover Evolution vs. Creationism documentary done by NOVA has some great dialog about this line of thinking. It's a great watch if you have the time for it.
CaptainAwesomeoh13 1 month ago in playlist More videos from agentorange20
@8698gil There is a God! We werent created by a big bang theory nor evolution, if anyone as yourself believes in these theories you must be off your rocker! evoltionists have found that there are a surprising number of animals that have not evolved but were created from the beginning to have the genetic makeup to needed to survive, if they werent created with these characteristics they would have died off along time ago.They didnt evolve these traits over millions of years or they would not live
DADof2MIXEDkids 1 month ago
@DADof2MIXEDkids Sorry to thread jack, but I couldn't resist. For starters, how the universe got here has no impact or relation to how animals evolved. They are two completely sciences. But while we're talking about big bang, we have models, a lot of good Einstein math, and other evidence to support the theory. Two scientists even won the Nobel Prize for their discovery of background radiation to support the theory in 1978.
CaptainAwesomeoh13 1 month ago in playlist More videos from agentorange20
@DADof2MIXEDkids Just wanna ask...which god? Thor? Allah? Zeus? That...elephant thing in India who's name I just forgot :/
To claim that one of those exists, by default, says that most of the other gods don't. Each of these different gods in today's world are all thought to be the true god. Who's right? Each follower claims the same dogma and has supernatural claims about their god. My simple answer is a "god" is the spackle used to fill in the gaps of misunderstanding.
CaptainAwesomeoh13 1 month ago in playlist More videos from agentorange20
This has been flagged as spam show
hey hey hey.... wait a minute. they said we evolved from fish, to monkeys, to humans, if that's so then why did'nt the cycle continue for each species? why did'nt all the fish evolve into land animals. why did'nt all the monkeys evolve into humans? come on scientists you've got alot of explaining to do. i think fish, and monkeys should be extinct if it was all evolution
hearteyhonkii 1 month ago
i did my science homework on this xx :D
123oweneasy 1 month ago
And there are no scientists who don't believe in evolution. At least, no respected scientists. Putting on a lab coat does not make one a scientist. Getting a phony degree from an unaccredited bible college that doesn't count means absolutely nothing in the real world.
8698gil 1 month ago
You fundies are the absolutely worst. Such simpletons. If anyone really believes that its even remotely plausible that there is an invisible being in the sky who created everything 6000 years ago they are incredibly stupid and ignorant. Not to mention arrogant. We are not special, we are just another species among millions. A little more intelligent, but that's all. You guys actually think you're so vastly important that you're never going to die.
8698gil 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@8698gil Homochirality is a disaster for naturalistic origins. All amino acids in proteins are 'LEFT-handed', while all sugars in DNA and RNA, and in the metabolic pathways, are 'RIGHT-handed'. Chirality!
A 50/50 mixture of left- and right-handed forms is called a racemate or racemic mixture!!. Which life can't use!! Its what we see in nature and in labs!
Life never came about by time chance natural processes! IMPOSSIBLE!!!
5tonyvvvv 1 month ago
@8698gil oh yea everything just happened.
mmnasir1000 1 month ago
@8698gil <3
LillyKri 1 month ago
You will see human evolution history will be trace to Africa.
Well at least the oldest human history known to man. ..until some factions relocated up north. I w b a i NG b a P.
standbyme2012 1 month ago
not evidence for evolution. evidence that animals have skulls. evolution must be proven genetically not forensically... similar bone structure is not good enough for science. dogs and cats are similar if one finds their skeletons intermingled in the field, they are obviously not genetially related. christians are rather more sophisticated than you give us credit for. prove evolution genetically and i'll be impressed. forensics is for detectives...
cwross1976 2 months ago
@cwross1976 You should read about the human genome project. It showed that humans and chimps share roughly 98% of the same Genetic sequence. In response to calling my massive scientific community statement "mob-rule", these scientists devote their entire lives to finding, studying, and debating the implications of each fossil. This is not merely the will of the majority, this is an accumulation of decades of careful study and discussion. Most agree the world is round, is that mob-rule too?
tennisdrums93 2 months ago
WE evolved from nothing, so were just...nothing...were a bunch of animals.
somebodycares16 2 months ago
People don't go fossil hunting enough to see the problem with the masses of missing fossils.
Rob187ok 2 months ago
Looking at fossils for nearly 50 years leaves me wondering why there's a massive lack of what we should be finding if everything evolved from a "simple" cell. All the changes that would have had to happen as creatures evolved should have left behind MOST of the fossils that that we find,, but it's hard to find any that show the ever changing history of evolution. Or am I just stupid???
Rob187ok 2 months ago
@Rob187ok No, you aren't stupid to notice the missing fossils. You are just seeing the obvious & admitting it. Here are Qs creationists asks - just a very, very few of them - regarding the so called fossil evidence for evolution: How come we were told that fins turned into feet, fish into tetrapods, scales into feathers and tetrapods turned into birds when tons & billiions of fossils only show 100% of each & no inbetweeners? How can they tell what a fossil's descendants reproduced? Cont.
LoricaLady 1 month ago
@LoricaLady ,, Thank you for your comment.which was very helpful. I found myself questioning what is clearly obvious,,,, because I just don't get how so many experts and great minds can be so lacking in simple common sense? It almost looks as if folk have lost the power to reason when it comes to this subject. It's all a little bit strange to say the least.
Rob187ok 1 month ago
Comment removed
LoricaLady 1 month ago
Comment removed
LoricaLady 1 month ago
@Rob187ok I have deleted 2 of my comments as I was typing in haste and thinking you were a different poster. Sorry. I'm not sure where you are coming from though. You already have been thinking for yourself by questioning what you have been taught for so long. But, if the evidence leads away from that - even in a different direction - do you think its ok to follow the data & not the consensus of "all those scientists"? Just curious.
LoricaLady 1 month ago
@LoricaLady,, nearly 50 years of being interested in fossils has shown me just how lacking the records are. I can see for myself and I can think for myself,,, and there's nothing more than a whole load of guessing to support what is taken as fact by those who just like the idea of all life evolving from a single living reproducing cell that fell together. That idea assumes much and is rigged to rule out an Almighty Creator, even though it's nothing but biased spiritless speculation.
Rob187ok 1 month ago
@Rob187ok Yeal it's sad how desperately some people like to believe they are the product of an uncaring primal pond & are the great etc. grandbabies of apes. But then it's kind of funny too how mad they get when you try to show them that's just not so.
LoricaLady 1 month ago
@LoricaLady ,, I don't think they like the idea of having to humble themselves before God. ,,,,,,, grandbabies of apes,,, so funny ,,,,, lol
Rob187ok 1 month ago
@Rob187ok You know, though, I used to be the same way. I bought evolution hook, line & sinker for a long time. And no, I did not want to humble myself to anyone. If there was hope for me there is hope for some of them! :-)
LoricaLady 1 month ago
@LoricaLady ,,Too right,,, even some hard core scientists are realising that the more they look the less they understand,,, and God is starting to make more sense. Truth is always there waiting for people to discover it,, and when all else fails truth stands tall..
Rob187ok 1 month ago
@Rob187ok Cont. For ex. they find a little fossils called Ida & tell you that's your great, great etc. grammaw. Based on? Based on magical thinking that tells us they know how its invisible descendants' invisible descendnats reproduced and connected to us via invisible dots. (How do you tell a "missing" link from a never existed one?) Check out Dr. Colin Patterson's quotes, an evolutionist who admitted the truth: there is "not one water tight case" for a transitional form. Cont.
LoricaLady 1 month ago
@Rob187ok Cont. ALL of evo theory & literature is like that. They present pure speculation as if it were actual evidence and call it science. They usually toss in a lot of logical fallacies, for ex. Correlation Does Not Imply Causation (Ida looking monkey-like doesn't mean she led to you), Fallacy of the Single Cause (refusal to look at any explanation other than evo and going to court to stop anyone else from doing so either) and the Incomplete Comparison Fallacy, etc. Pure sophistry & b.s.
LoricaLady 1 month ago
the madness of macro evolution continues....
whiteliketar 2 months ago
@tnafguy You cited one scientist whose work has been largely discredited by a massive scientific community. Humans have not been shown to exist for millions of years. In fact, modern apes as we know them hardly even existed 10 million years ago. You can say that an entire scientific community is lying to us, but then how can we prove Cremo is better than them. You can't! Please, I beg you to show me one picture of human evidence 100 million years old. I'd love for the Flintstones to be true!
tennisdrums93 2 months ago
@tennisdrums93 massive scientific community? science by democracy eh? well i guess your mob rule could just start making shit up then...
cwross1976 2 months ago
@tnafguy There's just so much incorrect with what you're saying I'm not sure whether to be offended or disappointed. Suggesting people who believe in evolution are pagans is ridiculous. Even the Pope acknowledges that the evidence is undeniable. Last I checked Catholicism is the original form of Christianity. To expect that million year old bones survive completely intact is so unrealistic. It's like saying "I think the earth is flat, and I won't be convinced unless NASA shoots me into orbit".
tennisdrums93 2 months ago
@tennisdrums93 , umm? "Last I checked Catholicism is the original form of Christianity" the Romans were notorious for incorporating every religion and god into their culture, last time I checked. including Christians religion.
SPAGHETTIMONSTER1 1 month ago
@tnafguy Natural selection is one of the primary forces behind evolution. All species naturally have inheritable variation, and among those varieties some will inherently be favored by the environment around them. Those that have features that are favorable to the environment will live longer and reproduce more often, passing those traits on to the next generation. Over many generations (in this case several MILLION YEARS) these favorable traits will compound and become more and more pronounced.
tennisdrums93 2 months ago
@tnafguy You could say ANYTHING is fake, but that doesn't make it true. The evidence that these aren't fakes comes from various fields of science, including chemistry and geology. Unless you discredit all science as incorrect, these will have to be accepted as real. Secondly, saying these are another type of human is exactly what is being argued! They are proto-humans, VERY different from apes as I've shown, but not quite human. These are older species of humans ancestral to us that evolved.
tennisdrums93 2 months ago
@tnafguy None of these skull are ape-like enough to be chimps or gorillas. The foramen magnum in these skulls (That hole where the neck connects to the head) faces DOWNWARD. In apes it faces backwards because they are quadrapeds. The cranial capacity of these skulls are significantly larger than that of any other apes, some have almost twice that amount. These skulls aren't apes, I've seen these skulls (and moldings) in person (have you?). The differences between them and apes are unmistakable.
tennisdrums93 3 months ago
@tnafguy Ummm... have you ever studied Apes or Monkeys? The fact that you'd even think any of these are "monkeys" is ridiculous if you actually knew the features of a monkey. And if these are gorillas or chimpanzees, they are absolute freaks! Their brains are enormous, their brow lines are almost invisible, their canines are dramatically reduced, and their arrangement suggests they walk fully upright. None of these features are consistent with apes, in fact they match human traits perfectly!
tennisdrums93 3 months ago
I'd like to send you a picture of what most would believe is a 1982 Olds Cutlass made by GM. but don't be deceived- it is really a rare specimen of what must have taken BILLIONS of years to spontaneously assemble by itself without any intelligent guidance. USE YOUR COMMON SENSE, MAN!
P.S. The car is much less complex than a single cell.
survive4550 3 months ago
@tnafguy
Of course they look like ape skulls! You are seeing our ape ancestors. Watch the video again, notice how the forehead and jaw converge to human-like, also brain gets bigger. We ARE apes.
gininginin 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Very good video............
dulanthad 3 months ago
btw whats the name of this song?
nurmal2 3 months ago in playlist Mais vídeos de agentorange20
@nurmal2 I think it is called, the super duper mute song.
thewhistler 3 months ago
i wonder why 17 people disliked this video. I guess truth is kinda scary, since there is no point in trying to prove fossils are fake... they just hate
nurmal2 3 months ago in playlist Mais vídeos de agentorange20
This has been flagged as spam show
@tnafguy
"not early humans, lol God, its so obvious, just look and stuy them"
So how does one creatard say a skull i shuman and another cretard say it human?
How can a cretaard claim a skull is human then chnage its mind and say ape?
How can creatards be confused? LOL
gorilla199uncensored 3 months ago
@tnafguy Right, you are so much smarter than biologists, geologists, chemists, and paleontologists. Thanks for all of your bible fed scientific perspective.
ripticdu 3 months ago in playlist Evolution 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey, kiddos, want to see a fairy tale that adults really believe? Google whale evolution and go watch a 7 minutes video on the PBS web site that shows how an ancient 200 pound wolf searched for food along the beach, wander out into the surf, and morphed (evolved) into a 100 ton whale. There is nothing scientific about it, but nonetheless, this is the fairy tale that some adults really believe! Especially comical are the nostrils migrating to the top of the head to become a blow hole!
achilles197474 4 months ago
Great vid. But stil no info on what the music :(
TheBatClass 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You, on the other hand, are having spectacular success at making yourself look stupid......
odinata 5 months ago
Keep in mind, idiotman197268, that your personal ignorance about the scientific facts does not mean that "God dunnit" is a valid substitute.
Its just simply what you tell yourself to keep from doing the work...
odinata 5 months ago
@odinata Well said.
MW2Addiction 5 months ago
Bye bye religion. You have nothing more to offer Homo sapein except suffering, death, child rape, anguish and lies. It wasnt fun having you control my species but now you cower in the dark corners of superstition and intermingle only with the weak of intellect, the failed, the fallen sub humans that pollute the great ape population. We no longer buy into the dead Jew zombie carpenter from the bible of death or the bearded pedophile rapist of children from the koran of suicide bombings.
699backstab 5 months ago
How are people still creationists? FOSSIL EVIDENCE. DNA PROOF.
Tearorwrist 5 months ago
I just love this song I turn it on to listen and watch the skullz
iliveon 6 months ago
You gotta be kidding me, believing evolution in 2011. Get a life
mironyuk 6 months ago
@mironyuk Like the Pope, National Council of Churches USA including methodists, anglicans, Episcopalian, Lutherans, all 144 of the graduate programs available for evolutionary biology, national geographic, animal planet, history channel, all biologists, all geneticists, all especially paleontologists, Princeton, Harvard, Cambridge all have evolutionary biology departments. Smithsonian museum and all other reputable museums around the world. Sorry, it seems you aren't living in reality
iliveon 6 months ago
@mironyuk What's your IQ?
Stinukli 5 months ago
Too fast...I didn't have enough time to read the captions before they faded...
NevilleRhysBarnes 7 months ago
If evolution is correct why are species distinct from each other with no evidence that they gradually evolved to other kind of species. Ever since apes are still apes, crocs are still crocs. Neandertals never interacted with modern man. Mutations are actually genetic defects. If you cross breed horse and donkey you will get a sterile mule. Fossils of lizards 250 million yrs ago indicated that they never evolved at all.
daogdaog 7 months ago
@daogdaog Well, first off you don't understand evolution and how population dynamics works and you likely don't know how many species of "Crocs" "apes" or hominids there were. And don't say you understand it either. I suggest you go look it up before you throw out all these creationist assumptions. Churches all around put creationism down and all scientific organizations condemn it because its contrary to reality. You don't understand evolution and you aren't as smart as a researcher
iliveon 7 months ago
@daogdaog And horse and donkey hybrid is infertile for evolutionary purposes. And there are more hybrids that can have children. Type in "fertile hybrids" in google and your answers will come. Also Neanderthals were a separate species that branched off from chimp-human-neanderthal ancestor. You probably don't understand this, so like I said, look up "how evolution works" before you give me a response. Take at least 30 minutes trying to find out, if u don't find answers. I will help you
iliveon 7 months ago
@daogdaog Look up evolution in wikipedia. And while you're at it, have a look at the *fact of evolution* chapter there. There are very good reasons why virtually nobody in science doubts evolution.: )
winterstellar 6 months ago
@daogdaog lol no evidence? really? you must be either too young to understand or trolling, you cant really think evolution is not true?
dukeznay 5 months ago
@dukeznay No amount of evolutionists idea will ever change the mere fact that species never evolved at all. We see forms today of lizards, shrimps, crocs similar to those fossilized millions of years ago
some even prior to the existence of dinos like the horse shoe crabs. Evolution theory is nothing but unverified assumptions after assumptions
daogdaog 5 months ago
@daogdaog Wow, your an idiot. Nuff said.
MW2Addiction 5 months ago
@MW2Addiction Let us see who is really an idiot here. Since around 100 million fossils have been unearthed, provide a list of four legged animals with short necks that gradually evolved into a giraffe. Since the changes were incremental according to Darwin, there should be thousands of
those transistional animals before they transform into a giraffe.
Short necked animals with highly developed long antlers used for
protection had to undergo reverse evolution to make those antlers short.
daogdaog 5 months ago
@daogdaog en.wikipedia . org/wiki/OkapiWe (Take out the spaces)
Anyways, thats a perfect example of a short necked giraffe. Also even if we didn't have any fossils for intermediate-length necks it wouldn't mean that the evolution of the long neck did not happen or was not a gradual process. It could simply have evolved in a small population of animals living in an area where dead animals didn't get fossilized.
Whos the idiot again?
MW2Addiction 5 months ago
@MW2Addiction So after 100 millions fossils unearthed, you have no watertight evidence to show that there was a gradual changes in the neck of animals prior to transforming to a giraffe. Just a mere speculation like how Darwin described it. What happened to the long and highly developed antlers of short necked animals prior to okapi? The okapi themselves should have starved and died if Darwin story is true. Female giraffes are shorter on average by a meter should have died too.
daogdaog 5 months ago
@daogdaog Oh my... I cannot even begin to fathom how much errors you have in your logic. This is pitiful that we have ignorant people like you now a days with straw man arguments and illogical claims from pure ignorance. There are plenty of fossils and there's a WHOLE BOOK written just about the evolution of giraffes. Search it, educate your self.
MW2Addiction 5 months ago
@MW2Addiction Plenty of fossils and whole book? try to list say 10 fossils of animals showing gradual changes before those animals transformed into a giraffe. Let us examine them one by one. Many biolgists are now suggesting that Darwin was wrong about the evolution of giraffes. They say it must be sexual selection not the way Darwin described it. So there is no agreement among the scientific community about the evolution of a giraffe.
daogdaog 5 months ago
@daogdaog 'giraffe'
The fossil record for the giraffe isn't as complete as other lineages, but there are some good books covering the specimens. 1 I suggest is The Evolution of Artlodactyls - Prothero. The modern Okapi is more typical of the group & ancestrally you're looking at specimens like Bohlinia,, Palaetragus, Cathumeryx.
agentorange20 5 months ago
@MW2Addiction Oh man, Thanks for the big 7 minute long belly laugh!! I've seen this video dozens of times already, and it's nothing but a bunch of Human, Ape, Monkey, and gorilla skulls and that's it. Where's the rest of ALL of those skulls, and the skeletal system that should be with it? Anybody can take a pile of bones and lay them out on a table in the form of a skeleton and call it whatever they want, that doesn't make it a transitional fossil. It's called DREAMING and WISHFUL THINKING!!
ironman197268 5 months ago
@ironman197268 Wow I cant believe theres ignorant people like you now a days. I give you empirical data and evidence from real fossils that people have found and you call it a dream? Are you this fucking arrogant?
No wonder creationist like you are called idiots over and over again. Your IQ is lower than a fucking mentally retarded dogs IQ. Thats how ignorant and unintelligent you are.
You give me no proof to support your claims and I give you proof to support my claims.
I win. Like always.
MW2Addiction 5 months ago
@MW2Addiction The more you keep wishing me to be so ignorrant, the smarter it makes me look. Your little analogy about my IQ and a retarted dogs IQ is evidence of that, because you have no idea what my IQ is, let alone a retaded dogs, you're just making more assumptions, aka "DREAMING" You know I bet they didn't cabon date those skulls, cause if the did they would find traces of C14 in them, like they find in 600 million year old diamonds because NOTHING in this universe is millions of years old
ironman197268 5 months ago
@ironman197268 Before you come here and call your self smart and call me dumb, at least check your spelling. You fail to even comprehend the English language let a lone write it. Its ok my little ape-descendant your willfully ignorant, that's why you cant even understand my arguments. The amount of evidence that supports a old Earth is so much that only IGNORANT people deny it. And who here is denying it? Oh yeah! Thats right YOU!
Good luck being an uneducated idiot for the rest of your life.
MW2Addiction 5 months ago
@MW2Addiction I didn't call you dumb, and I didn't call me smart, and this isn't a spelling contest DING DONG!! You're quite the hypocrite when you go clowning somebodies spelling when you used to use the word "proofs" out of context. OK, if this Earth is so old, why is C14 found inside of 600 million year old diamonds Jenius?
ironman197268 5 months ago
@ironman197268 Coal (and subsequently diamonds) often has uranium deposited along with it. This uranium frequently contaminates the coal (and also subsequently diamonds) for radiation readings. It is a much different process from merely taking a piece of wood or cloth, cleaning it, and carbonizing it in a lab and then taking C14 readings. It is more accurate with regard to coal (and diamond) deposits to check uranium-lead isotope ratios.
MW2Addiction 5 months ago
@ironman197268 I also dont know who told you such lies, cause C14 is not found in diamonds. Please cite your sources because if not It didn't happen. And even if it did, I already gave you a valid explanation as to what could have happened.
Either way though, C14 is NEVER found in diamonds. Whoever told you this is a liar. So please, give me the source and then maybe I will believe you.
MW2Addiction 5 months ago
@MW2Addiction C14 is most certainly found in diamonds, you are one of the very few evilutionists that deny this claim. Here's a good video that will sum it all up for you, enjoy...
watch?v=hV3m5R8XnAw&list=FLTO5qiOsTe6oBddIjsjz5MQ&index=25
ironman197268 5 months ago
@ironman197268 Coal (and subsequently diamonds) often has uranium deposited along with it. This uranium frequently contaminates the coal (and also subsequently diamonds) for radiation readings. It is a much different process from merely taking a piece of wood or cloth, cleaning it, and carbonizing it in a lab and then taking C14 readings. It is more accurate with regard to coal (and diamond) deposits to check uranium-lead isotope ratios.
Theres also many other reasons. You need to read a book.
MW2Addiction 5 months ago
@MW2Addiction Well then obviously scientists have taken diamonds and contaminated them with C14 to show that underground uranium can cause a chemical reaction to impregnate a diamond with just a little bit of C14 right? Do you know how RARE underground uranium is? This contamination would have had to have happened around 200,000 years ago to show the amounts seen today right?. Is this contamination process continual, if so, how and why?
ironman197268 5 months ago
@ironman197268 Ok seems like you want me to answer a lot of questions. I have found the perfect video that should answer your question on C14 in diamonds.
youtube. com /watch?v=T-o7ArSeSOY (Take out the spaces)
MW2Addiction 5 months ago
@MW2Addiction Oh man, what another big laugh!! Good old greeneto. That video is nothing but an example of what you have all ready told me, in the form of a person saying the words. Where is his results of contaminating a diamond with C14, from experiments of his own?
ironman197268 5 months ago
@ironman197268
Why don't the facts confirm your whacky religious opinions?
odinata 5 months ago
@odinata Made up evilutionary dreams are not facts, it's wishful thinking. The Biblical account fits the reality that we live in better than all the 100s of excuses science comes up with to and explain their wacky religion.
ironman197268 5 months ago
@ironman197268
So you don't even know what the facts are?
Is this why your opinions haven't replaced science?
odinata 5 months ago
@odinata Do you really believe that scientist are going to announce to the world that they are wrong, and the creationists are right? Of coarse not, they're going to continue to work on coming up with excuses to back their ridiculous claims.
ironman197268 5 months ago
@ironman197268
Do you really believe that the facts aren't facts?
How do you like that computer your wasting time on?
odinata 5 months ago
@odinata Hes an idiot. Ironman is one of the most illogical human beings ever. Hes ignorant, refutes evidence, and then covers his ears and goes LALALALAL when you tell him the truth.
MW2Addiction 5 months ago
@MW2Addiction
Oh, I can see that.
I'm going to make him painfully aware of that fact......
odinata 5 months ago
@odinata Good :) Its hard though against somebody who is so uneducated and ignorant.
MW2Addiction 5 months ago
@odinata Oh boy, looks like I've got some tag team DREAMERS now, Bwuaaaaahaaaahahahahahaaaa!!!
ironman197268 5 months ago
@ironman197268
How come you aren't able to present any facts to replace science with?
odinata 5 months ago
@odinata I'm not trying to replace science with anything. Evolution is not science because there is nothing in the world that's observable about it, evilutionists WISHES there is but, there isn't. Is this what you call painful?
ironman197268 5 months ago
@ironman197268
Why doesn't the science agree with you?
odinata 5 months ago
@odinata Where does it disagree with me?
ironman197268 5 months ago
@ironman197268
In the Biology Departments in every University on the planet......
odinata 5 months ago
@odinata The real biology, or the biology that attempts to support evilution, and brainwash thousands into believing such a big LIE made by Satan?
ironman197268 5 months ago
@ironman197268
No True Scotsman fallacy.
You seem to think that if it doesn't conform to your personal idiotic religious opinion, then its not real.
NO science agrees with you.
odinata 5 months ago
@odinata Science doesn't agree that there was a beginning?
ironman197268 5 months ago
@ironman197268
Science doesn't agree with your YEC feelings.
odinata 5 months ago
@odinata So science denies that there was a beginning?
ironman197268 5 months ago
@ironman197268
Science shows that the Earth doesn't have a supernatural beginning 6,000 years ago.
odinata 5 months ago
@odinata Hes to ignorant to see that. When you give him evidence and stump his illogical arguments he says SATAN DID IT! SATAN DID IT! Lol what a dreamer.
MW2Addiction 5 months ago
@MW2Addiction Man you keep giving me so much empirical evidence of your WISHES. I said satan did it ONE time throughout this entire debate, but you said, I said it TWICE. Then you give me evidence of your hypocrisy when you call me a dreamer... I know, I'm just a brainless retard.
ironman197268 5 months ago
@ironman197268
"I know, I'm just a brainless retard."
Now you're getting it!
Good boy!
odinata 5 months ago
@odinata The Big bang theory would be the MAGICAL one. How did Moses KNOW there was a beggining when he wrote Genesis 3500 years ago?
ironman197268 5 months ago
Comment removed
odinata 5 months ago
@ironman197268 You are such a dreamer lmao. Anybody in those times were extremely religious and thought there had to be some magical flying man that created all this. Thats how he knew. He didn't not shit about logic and reason though. He had no idea what an atom was. What a cell was. What proton was, electron, and billions of other things scientist have discovered. You are so ignorant to the point where your delusional.
MW2Addiction 5 months ago
@MW2Addiction Moses may have not known what an atom was, but Paul certainly did, or at least he wrote down something in The Bible that is beyond a coincidence, that is clearly discribing quantum theory.
Hebrews 11:3 dream on boys....
ironman197268 5 months ago
@ironman197268
YOU don't know what an atom is......
odinata 5 months ago
@odinata You wish I don't know what an atom is, you're the one that doesn't know what it is, otherwise you could help you LOSER friend MEGA WISHER addicted 2, come up with an EXCUSE, about Hebrews 11:3 HAAAHAAAA!!!!
ironman197268 5 months ago
@ironman197268
You don't know how to tie your own shoes.
You are the modern equivalent of a flat-earther.
"otherwise you could help you LOSER friend..."
You can't even form a sentence....
odinata 5 months ago
@odinata The Bible clearly teaches that the Earth is round, Isaiah 40:22, Job 26:10. That was a pathetic attempt at trying to make look stupid!!
PS, I guess this isn't a sentence?
ironman197268 5 months ago
@ironman197268
"That was a pathetic attempt at trying to make look stupid!!"
You aren't having much luck with the English language....
odinata 5 months ago
@ironman197268 "By faith we understand that the universe was created by the word of God, so that what is seen was not made out of things that are visible."
OH MY GOSHHHH! YOU JUST OPENED MY MIND! THIS IS SO TRUE!!! OH MY GOD! GOD ALMIGHTY THE SPIRIT OF LORD JUST HIT ME!
Lol your retarded. This doesn't proof that he knew that the universe was created out of things we dont see. This just proves that people back then believed in INVISIBLE gods and a whole bunch of other witch crafts and myths.
MW2Addiction 5 months ago
@MW2Addiction Yeah, you WISH that's what it said. How do you get "GODS"(Plural) out of,"The word of GOD?"(singular) How is that verse speaking of more than ONE GOD?
ironman197268 5 months ago
@ironman197268
Moses didn't right anything.
Ever.
Cosmology isn't magic.
Your fairytale is.
odinata 5 months ago
@odinata 'Cosmology isn't magic.
Your fairytale is.'
Oh snap.
agentorange20 5 months ago
@ironman197268 "I know, I'm just a brainless retard." Wow you finally got something right, congratulations.
Anyways, you still fail to provide any evidence that proves evolution is wrong. You know why? Cause evolution has OVERWHELMING amounts of evidence that supports it. So much that it is a PROVEN FACT. You claim we cant see evolution happen yet we HAVE. Scientist have seen evolution happen in bacteria and in organisms with short life spans. Your an illogical dumb ass.
MW2Addiction 5 months ago
@MW2Addiction Hey, nice crappy job comparing humans to bacteria. So what do you think came first, Bees or trees?
ironman197268 5 months ago
@ironman197268 Can you please explain to me how the hell this has anything to do with evolution? Are you avoiding the conversation?
MW2Addiction 5 months ago
@MW2Addiction Hey man, in order for trees to reproduce, the male and female ones have to pollinate, sometimes there too far apart to do so, and require certain insects to make this happen for them. So... what came first, INSECTS, or trees?
ironman197268 5 months ago
@ironman197268
Trees, idiotman197268.
Gymnosperms didn't use insects to pollinate.
FAIL.
odinata 5 months ago
@odinata I told you he is a deluded piece of garbage with illogical fallacies and no common sense. His new name is now idiotman197268 :)
MW2Addiction 5 months ago
@odinata 'Gymnosperms didn't use insects to pollinate'
Cash money!
agentorange20 5 months ago
@ironman197268 Your question should be about flowers and bees not vice versa. The bee and the flower evolved together. A clearer question is, which came first, the pollinating insect or the flower. Given this question the answer is the flower. The reasons being as follows:
1) there are wind pollinated flowers that do not require insect vectors.
2) prior to the existence of flowers, any insects could not have been "pollinating" for the simple reason there would be nothing for them to pollinate.
MW2Addiction 5 months ago
@ironman197268
Trees.
odinata 5 months ago
@odinata That's not what I asked you, did it have a BEGINNING scientifically?
ironman197268 5 months ago
@ironman197268
Not a magical one 6000 years ago.
odinata 5 months ago
@MW2Addiction I was right, pay up LOSER!!
ironman197268 5 months ago
@ironman197268 Haha its funny and ironic cause this is what creationist do. They are constantly being proven wrong over and over again by logical thinking and evidence but they never say, "The scientist are right and we are wrong." They keep on lying and spouting bullshit out of their mouths like you.
MW2Addiction 5 months ago
@ironman197268 You deluded piece of shit. Im sorry but you are the most arrogant ignorant utterly retarded human being I have yet to ever speak to in my life. You are a living, breathing proof of the failure of the United States School system. I seriously cannot believe someone so arrogant like you could make such extraordinary claims and have no evidence to back it up. Your the one who is wishful thinking matter fact YOUR WORSE than that. Your DELUSIONAL.
MW2Addiction 5 months ago
@ironman197268 Awwww are you butt hurt cause he destroyed the creationist argument? Aww its okay. You should really consider being an evolutionist. Move towards the truth, not the lies. :)
MW2Addiction 5 months ago
@MW2Addiction Man you better hope you don't ever find a genie's lamp, cause you'll burn through your 3 wishes faster than a monkey taking a dump on himself. Speaking of monkeys, if they are our cousins then why can we live so much longer than they can? They would've had the same genetic opportunities that we did. And why are we so much more advanced than they are?
ironman197268 5 months ago
@ironman197268 LOL! I thought you knew about evolution? You always claimed that you knew more about evolution than I did. So why are you coming up with these questions... obviously cause you dont know the answers to. And the questions that you are asking, sadly are the easiest questions of all time. So easy that I sometimes wonder if you have a brain.
MW2Addiction 5 months ago
@MW2Addiction I know about the lie that it is. I ask these questions because I know there is no real answer for them, other than the pathetic made up answers. If you know all about it, and claim it to be such a fact, then you would immediately answers those questions effortlessly, instead of trying boost your self esteem with phony flattery, like wondering whether or not I have a brain. Does that MW in your username stand for Massive Wisher, and that's what you're addicted to?
ironman197268 5 months ago
@ironman197268 Oh really? I have answered EVERY single one of your questions you silly ape. Get the fuck out of here with your delusional and creationist bull shit. You have yet to even put up a challenge against me. There is no VALID proof that disproves evolution at all. Matter fact there is evidence that proves evolution to be a fact! Your to fucking stupid and blind to see it. Your uneducated therefore you dont know shit about evolution. And I have my evidence to back up these claims.
MW2Addiction 5 months ago
@MW2Addiction Wow, A 1500 character long wish, that's pretty impressive. Why is the woodpecker so much different than other birds? It's feet, it's tongue that goes through the back of it's head and nose, then can stick out of it's beak several inches? What about the platypus? Hey what came first, bees or trees? I bet you will ignore all of this, and please don't go telling me to do some research dumbass, cause you should have an arsenal of answers to these questions ready to fire at will!!
ironman197268 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ironman197268 "cause you should have an arsenal of answers to these questions ready to fire at will!!"
talkorigins. org /faqs/woodpecker/woodpecker.html (Remove spaces)
talkorigins. org /faqs/platypus.html (Remove spaces)
Its funny how you dont even know that we already have explanations to everything that your asking. This proves my point that you fail to even understand how to use a computer to do research. You also clearly fail at going to school.
MW2Addiction 5 months ago
@ironman197268 "Speaking of monkeys, if they are our cousins then why can we live so much longer than they can?"
You CONSTANTLY FAIL to even realize the basic knowledge of EVOLUTION. Evolution NEVER states that monkeys are our closest ancestor or cousin. If you cant even understand the basic principles of evolution, that really shows the LACK of knowledge you have on evolution to begin with. It seriously lowers your credibility, over and over again.
MW2Addiction 5 months ago
@MW2Addiction You need to come tag in for your buddy odinata!!