LEOPARD 2
3:12
Added: 3 years ago
From: tanker070
Views: 408,556
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (1,031)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Im hungarian but my friends the germans!!! :DD best armys in the world the german and hungarian :)) so god bless the germans and hungarian too, and sure the rammstein xDD

  • If i were to die today I'd want that to shoot me

  • kabinet: geef onze defensie zijn slagkracht terug bitte!

  • screw abrams LEOPARD 2 FOREVER

  • 28 are the super-awesome-jealous American engineers.

  • Dear santa...

  • @mightygreengrinch87 It's a modern tank.

  • May i know whats the song call?

  • 101 tankbat? kent iemand nog O.W.I CJ Bussink. die heeft daar begin jaren 90 gezeten. hahaha mijn ouweheer ;)

  • beast tanks

  • Просто Классное Видео. БАНГГГ БАНГГГ !!!!!!

  • German Power!!! Fucking awesome!

  • I BUILT THE LEO 2A5 AND HAVE THE LEO 2A6 IN 1/35 SCALE, PRICEY BUT WORTH IT. LOT OF DETAIL TRICKY ON THE CAMO SCHEME I USED THE TAMIYA NATO GREEN,NATO BLACK AND NATO BROWN, ONE KIT I WOULD DEFENATLEY RECOMEND.

  • The Modern Tiger: Hail Germany !! Leopard 122 for life !!

  • @cryteeek no modern panther leopard is a realative of panther and they even said they modified a ww2 panther desighn in to a modern tank

  • German perfection !!! This incredible machine...and the engine - 1500 hp. Fuck !!!

    T-72 had only 780... - I would not stand in his way with my T-72. Never.

  • nice video! beautiful camouflage colours!

  • Leopard > abrams.

  • really is best then mirkava and abrahams and its normale german have the panzer 1 and then panzer 2 in this time in world war 2 europe dont know build a good tank like panzer and now german back with best tank called leopard viva german and fuck usa and all europe

  • you have to hand it to them germans make the coolest and best tanks

  • That handsome guy in this footage in the beginning is my brother,Hans... greetings XX Esther

  • 28 comrades ride in Russian death traps.

  • Germany may produce good equipment but if the politicians have their way there may soon be no German army to speak of.The German people live with their heads in history instead of learning from it and I fear more American and British lives will be lost in the interests of a free world while they sit on their backsides playing politics. They are happy to export the weapons of war and watch their allies die from the sidelines however. This is no comment on the brave Germans currently serving!

  • @FrancoHitlini germany would still produce and sell tanks even if they had no army. they are the best engineers.

  • @jgtheman84 I am not commenting on the skill of German engineers. My point was the contradiction between German politicians wanting to disband the German army but are quite willing to accept the sale of arms and watch their so called "allies" die in the name of freedom, not only ours but theirs also. There is even talk about forming a German "Foreign Legion" so German people wont have to fight! It's a moral question their "allies" need to consider!

  • @FrancoHitlini Thats totally untrue.

    Also, it's not the "German Army" it's the Bundeswehr.

  • @hellcatdave1 Hope your right and the press and politicians are wrong

  • German engineering gives me a hard-on.

  • I love these.. but when you think about it. How effective are they gonna be against a powerful air force ?

  • Yeah, germans sure know how to make good quality warmaterial.

  • 2:22 camper!!

  • bang bang !!

  • Canada dumped buying a bunch of Stryker's after seeing first hand in Afghanistan the effectiveness of having this powerful tank..Think they even bought a 100 more..

  • Now that's real Heavy Metal.

  • I always wanted to join the tank corps but it is a shame that our government got rid of these beautiful machines.

  • i think when you compare the abilities of the worlds best ground vehicles the Germans always tend to make the best ones, i am american and there is a possibility we may be replacing our Bradley's with the Puma IFV, it would be good to have some superior german engineering in our arsenal.but until then.

    halten Sie die gute Arbeit Deutschland! :) (i hope that was right)

  • the best tank in the world by far

  • Could someone please explain how this tank is better than the Abrams? Apparently it is but could someone tell me?

  • @MetalSights Because is German simple as that jejejejejeje!

  • The armor packs are all secrete but apparently Germany has stayed state of the art in offering excellent countermeasure for these tanks..They also offer easy in field maintenance and complete power plant exchange in a matter ofhours.

  • Saudi just bought 200 of these toys and Germany Oks it :)

    greeting from Saudi .

  • the best tank in the world

  • @zascas1000 after banzer king!

  • Whew, that's a tough statement to defend. The problem is that you can't go by looks and what's written down on a spec sheet. The only TRUE measure of a MBT is it's combat history. And I don't think this tank has been head to head with another, to my knowlege. The only modern tanks of this caliber to have seen real tank on tank combat is the Abrahms, the Challenger II, the Merkava. I am by no means taking anything away from the Leo2, but it's hard to quantify with hard data :)

  • @0Heavy0Metal0 haha hater go away and screw your self :P

  • @30sectodeath right, whatever. go and finish your homework and study for your test tomorrow. high school can be very difficult when your retarded. and don't forget your crayons!

  • You Germans have made a tank that countrys all over the world are using to fight for freedom! Im sure you guys are proud...and you should be! Definatley the best tank in the world right now! From Canada.

  • leopard forever

  • 28 M1-A2-Abrams fans disliked this supertank!!!

  • gvd . als echte "zandhaas" heb ik het misschien niet zo op "tankers" .. maar serieus .. zo ff wegbezuinigd worden door Den Haag slaat toch wel nergens op ..

  • I'm sorry for using"sir",but this is quite refreshing for me since the last one I debated regularly calls me an idiot or a dumbpfacke, whatever that means.Seriously, man, the leo 2s new arrowhead turret is flawed, trapping the force of the explosion between the turret and the hull if hit in the downside of the foreside turret.The escape hatch is also one, that's why the m1doesn't have one.Cya later.

  • My whole point was, if a 10kg ied was enough to penetrate the leo 2s supposedly superior armor, I wonder what would have happened to it if it was hit by an ied with an explosive weight of 60/90 kgs? Such an explosion picked up a 68 ton m1a2 several inches in the air and nearly flipped it over. Fortunately, none of the crews got hurt. Another 90 kg ied tore the turret loose off another m1a2 though no one got killed. These powerful ieds are made up of several 155 mm shells attached to a detonator.

  • Germany is still keeping her head low after the events of WW2..that's why they don't get involved much in foreign conflicts of hear much about it's military..it's a pity coz German soldiers are the best in the world.

  • gracias leo 4 .

  • In Chile we have Leo2A4 mybe the most powerlful panzer in our region, peru have T-60 and Argentina TAM, with a lot of years in service....

  • Und wieder Rammstein, dmn fuck

  • BANG BANG.......FEUER FREI

    GRUSS aus Canada

  • @TotalKOW whats GRUSS aus Canada mean lol, we canadians use these awsome tanks, alot better than the abrams in my opinion :)

  • BANG!! BANG!!

  • The Leopard is admittedly a superb piece of armor. But it is rather quaint that everybody but the Germans are using them in the current theaters of war. Come on Germany, grow some balls and take a little pride in your impressive feat of engineering. =)

    Lots of love from Denmark (a satisfied customer and frequent user of Leopards in Afghanistan...). =D

  • @Haubitzer Ironically, it was a danish leo 2a5 w/c got hit with a small caliber ied in afghanistan which resulted in 3 wia and 1 kia. Thanks for proving the superiority of the m1 armor which can withstand an ied attached to a 60 to 90 kg explosive charge. Happened on july 25, 2008. Peace.

  • @m16a4ish Yeah, I was there actually, So I might have more accurate facts. The IED detonated right under the driver's escape hatch and killed him. No one else was injured. The Leopards had at that time suffered multiple IED-detonations and it is therefore logical that the armor had been weakened somewhat. An afterthought: Are you seriously making that incident a lynchpin for dick-measuringcontest? That would be poor manners at best...

  • @Haubitzer Excuse me, sir, bur if you really were there, why is it that you forgot how the other 3 crews were wounded and that they actually left the driver to escape? And wouldn't you think that if your claim is true that the said tank had it's armor weakened by previous hits from other ieds, isn't it negligent of the danes to not repair it? And comparing the performance of the said tanks is not a lynchpin for dick measuring, my friend. Just stating the facts as it is.

  • @m16a4ish First off, I commend you for keeping this debate in a proper tone. Cudo's to you.

    But really, don't "sir" me. I work for a living. Then I would add that if your tank is rolling hastily towards a rather deep wadi, you'd wanna get off too. Also, minor scratches and bruises are not "injured" or "wounded". That's what medals are given for, maybe! Yes, the Danish Army is notoriously hard to wring those little pieces of metal out of.

  • @m16a4ish Whether or not it was negligent not to switch out the whole tank, which would most likely have been necessary, is not for me to say. But we, the Danes, are somewhat hampered by limited ressources. ;)

    I do disagree with your opinion that using this incident is not bad taste, mainly because I knew the driver and the rest of the crew. I also disagree with your facts, since they are not accurate! Just stating the obvious.

  • @Haubitzer I really do apologize if it seems that i was disrespecting the unfortunate crews of that tank. I only have the highest respect for those who made the ultimate sacrifice for their country. Sorry if that sounded a bit melodramatic, but i meant every word. Hmmm, but I do seem to remember those 3 as officially listed as wia in the nato roster. Whether you or I is the one who's accurate can't be really properly proven in youtube, dude.

  • tbh .. i can understand leopar aren't of much use anymore in the Dutch Army's role .. ( read mid-east "peace missions" ) .. but for real .. FUCk Hillen for taking the spine out of the dutch army by cutting all it's tanks :S

  • You have to respect German engineering, this is why I would choose a BMW over a Cadillac

  • German weapons are the best. We have many Leopards in Greece!

  • I love how anything related to Germany in videos use Rammstein music, so annoying.

  • @tette666: A German general (Fridolin von Senger) said in 1940, when Germany invaded the Netherlands: "The Dutch army is a joke, and not even a good one." Without the Leopard, we're back at may 1940. Politicians are killing the army. It's a bloody shame!

  • Dutch Army is selling all of it's armoured forces; 60 Leopards. Good thing? I mean, does an army still need to be equiped with tanks? Opinions?

  • @tette666 not the dUTCH army...Holland is a joke country...there are only 4 countries in Europe that count...the rest of them don't need tanks!!!

  • @realdealforsure What joke country? We are making preparations for a single European army

  • @realdealforsure I love your ignorance. Without the budget cuts over here in the Netherlands our army would be as strong as Germany's army. Also without the Netherlands the EU would crumble since it is all about Germany and Germany is an exporting nation and all of that is shipped abroad in the Netherlands. Don't tell me that you count either Italy or Spain as an impotent country since they are both getting closer and closer to asking for financial support from the EU.

  • @tette666 Really sad waste, we had some good track record with these tanks (love the simplicity of them need more range, no need for fancy fire control systems that break down, just put a longer barrel on the thing)

    Sad to see them go, though I am more sad to see our naval strength reduced, our navy should be the key of our defence forces seeing how important trade by sea is for our country.

  • @tette666 Yes, ofcourse we should have tanks! Idiots who sell them! The airforce is not the anwer who can fall in for the tanks, no, they can't fly at all times. A tank can drive in all weather

  • Ste s l DIOS d la guerra ke veras ants d volar n mil pedazos.

    La guerra komnzó.

    ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡MATA O MUERE!!!!!!!

  • oh.. cool tank !

  • Unfortunatly the idiotic minister of defence of the Netherlands has desided to get rid of ALL the tanks because of cuts on the defence budget. :(

    Turning an Army into a police force.

  • @NationalSniper Hopefully, their big brother Germany will help solve domestic terrorist threats.

  • Perfect German Tank

  • Perfect German Tank

  • loves these tanks, but I think the Abrams m1a2 is a ton better

  • @SpiderDroid2 Abrams use jet engine. Jet engine use jet fuel. Jet fuel easy flammable.İf enemy hit jet fuel carrying truck Abrams useless. USA needs new Tank concept.

    Sorry my bad English.

  • @Hellmarch

    If enemy hits diesel trucks then diesel tank is useless. Abrams is available with diesel engine.

    The gas turbine is quiet, reliable has good performance and runs on many fuel types. The only real drawback is the heat and fuel consumption (but a Leo 2 isn't very economical either).

    Both are excellent tanks and they are both derived from the MBT-70 project.

    Abrams has better armor but Leo2 tiny bit better mobility and firepower. L44 with DU is close to L55 gun penetration.

  • @NationalSniper Where do you come up with this rubbish? Do you just make it up for the sake of talking? I have not seen you make one correct comment yet! lol ALL NATO TANKS SINCE THE 1950's HAVE BEEN MULTIFUELLED, its a STANAG which is a NATO Standardization Agreement that they all have to be able to run on any type of fuel.

  • @Hellmarch lol u are right.

  • German tanks will always be superior.

  • Der Name dieses Lied?

    

  • CANADA LOVES THESE TANKS!!!!!

  • @Fiend2011 ya we do

  • da miedo

    MUCHO MIEDO... es un increible y el mejor L2

  • i love german engineering.

  • Thank you Germany for the best tanks in the world yesterday, today, and tomarrow.

  • Not a bad tank the 2a7 has the much needed improved armor too.

  • I hate the music.

  • @USMCFUCKYEA I believe you are wrong good sir

    See the Leo has 3 major things that make it better than the M1,

    1) it has a V12 Turbo Diesel, which is far better in terms of range and refuelling time(Remeber your M1 uses a V10 Turbo'd Gas engine which is good for about 400miles, this is good for about 600)

    2nd) The fact that its using DU is bad idea, great in a shell, bad idea when it comes to armor, and this is a proved fact that tank crews are getting sick now because of it

    3) Its Germany

  • @AdamSavage88 Yes all tanks do

  • I've always loved German tanks. Tiger I is my favorite tank from WWII. Leopard 2A6 is my favorite modern tank, 2nd is M1A2 Abrams, then 3rd is Challenger II.

  • The Leopard 2A6 also uses the L55 smoothbore gun from the German company Rheinmetall.

    The Leopard 2A5 uses the L44 smoothboregun.

    Both are 120mm

  • @tanker070 wrong, 2a6 uses l55 smoothbore 122 mm

  • Leo is little bigger than abrams and it goes faster.

    Leo have bigger range, It have better armour.

    AND it is much reliable than Abrams.

    I'am from finland and we have 139 Leopard 2s

  • @USMCFUCKYEA And where do you think it is made ??

    Yea, in Germany..

  • The music name, please?

    god movie.

  • @neisonsg1 rammstein, feur frie

  • @neisonsg1 the track = 'Bang-Bang' by rock band 'Rammstein'

  • @TigerIPanzer It's Feuer Frei by Rammstein.

  • @Erk7RK actually you're wrong...I've got that track on CD and it's called 'bang-bang'

  • The germans are making very good quality, the norwegian forces have used german weapons in many many years.

  • @USMCFUCKYEA i mixed up some numbers. the m1 uses the 120mm cannon from rheinmetall germany. its pretty much exactly the same as the ones on leo2's, but with a shorter barrel(l44 of m1's and l55 on leo2's) far superior my ass.

  • @USMCFUCKYEA wtf, i didnt read u comment properly, ur saying the abrams is superior in firepower? lol i would very much like u to explain that 1, considering the m1 wields a 110mm cannon and the leo2 a 125mm.

  • @catbearlol Hey moron. The m1 did use an 105 mm cannon, but the m1a1 and m1a2 are using smoothbore 120 mm guns, just like the leo2. The only tank that uses the 125 mm gun is the t72.

  • @m16a4ish and the 1-90 uses a 125mm as well.

  • @m16a4ish T80 and I think the T90 as well or else the T90 has 135

  • @USMCFUCKYEA i dont know where to begin... nice nick BRO. the m1 accelerates faster than the leo. the leo is heavier. thats "the fuck im on about".

  • @USMCFUCKYEA its provent the leopart 2 is the best tank in the world get over it..

  • I was a driver in one of these and I can tell you , nothing beats the Leopard 2A6.

  • I am a driver in one of these and I can tell you , nothing beats the Leopard 2A6.

  • This is my fetish

  • inb4 abrams vs leo2 shitstorm.

    both have advantages and disadvantages. the leo uses a v12, the abrams uses a gas turbine. leo has more armour, abrams is lighter.taliban rpg's arebouncing of both of them thats for sure..!

  • @catbearlol I was a driver in one of these in the Dutch army and I can tell you , nothing beats the Leopard 2A6.

  • the only thing the abrams is better at is night warfare because of its technology,but when it comes to mechanical engineering Deutscland über alles.

  • @williamhad the abrams use a gas turbine engine unlike the leo which uses a regular internal combustion engine. this gives the abrams much better acceleration but less fuel effiency.

  • the track system on the leopard seems to work better than the abrams

  • the suspension on these things is insane

  • The Power Pack... Engine and Gearbox from the Dutch Leopard MB, and a x number of German leopards MBTare made by Stork Netherlands.

  • Funny to see that many people regard this as the best tank just by taking account of his armor. For example, it has no system of automatic recharging, has a crew of 4 men, increasing its size and makes it easier to spot. Moreover, its enormous weight makes it impracticable on certain lands, as in Yugoslavia. It is the same for Challenger2.

  • ich find einfach das der leopard der schönste panzer ist nach dem t 90 =D der siht einfach dreckig und krass aus typisch russland eben

  • hello from belgium DEUTSCHLAND HELL YEAH!!!!!!!!

  • All this e-peening and flaming about which tank is better .. Both M1A2 Abrams and Leopard 2A6 are incredible machines. Whatever differences they do have in performance are canceled out by crew training. Personally, I seriously don't want to sit in any tank that either an M1A2 or 2A6 is angry at and I'm glad that the armies fielding Abramses and Leopards are allies.

    That said, I prefer Leopard. It just looks cooler in my opinion, and the fact that it has a V12 instead of a thirsty turbine helps.

  • @fnglert I agree, wouldn't want to mess with either. BTW, both tanks have their ceramic plate armor made in Canada and since both are NATO, there is a lot of shared tech. British Challenger is very good as well. Don't know much about the French tanks. I must admit, the lower profile leopard is pretty cool.

  • for me MERKAVA ITS THE BEST TANK because it has much longer service than abrams from 1980 until present day because Israel and Palestine never sign a peace and the newest Merkava its 4th edition in which soldiers were involved when they were design a new Merkava!!!!! And ofcourse its the safest tank in the world

  • Think God German's are alive most of our Military's Weapons and arsenal is German.... One of the worlds first jets were German, and also the Rocket so lets not fuck with Germany

  • aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa­aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa quiero uno iguallllll XD k pasadaa joder y la musica de rammstein inmejorablee mis felisitaciones x el video :D

  • perhaps i should explain myself better. you seem to be looking at only a very small fraction of what a tanks advantages and disadvantages are. you are looking at armor, firepower, and mobility. little do you know that there is more to a tank nowadays than that. there are automated systems, efficient engines (if an abrams wants to compete with either other tanks it must be moving constantly because it burns more than a conventional engine when stopped but less while moving)

  • @KottonmouthSoldiers (... this is because it uses the same technology as a jet fighter plane, which if youll notice are rarely not in motion) not to mention targetting systems, software, repairability (the abrams cannot be plugged into a computer and have a diagnosis run through all the tanks operations looking for malfunction/damaged hardware) and dozens of other factors, most of which have only present themselves in recent years. maybe you knew a lot back in your day, but times have changed.

  • lets get this straight leopard 2 is the best tank today 2nd is the chalanger and 3th is the abrams all good tanks. well maby the challenger is better but there are way more leo2s build than challenger 2s.

  • German Steel

  • Has the Leo 2 like the Abrams extinsive battle experience?

  • Dear Santa....

  • @brammetjuuhh

    I hear you my child

    But Santa only has 1 and he likes it too much ^^

  • Comparing quality tanks is like comparing quality cars, or comparing diamonds based on how they were cut. Either way, they all shine brilliantly.

  • Ya gotta love the Germans! They even built one with a 140mm main gun! hehehe Bigger, better, badass!

  • Definitely meaner looking than a M1A2!!! All's ya gotta do is roll into North Korea in one of these blarin' some RAMMSTEIN and they'd piss themselves!

  • Leopard is not better tahn abrams

  • @veruz75 Could you say why abrams is better?

    Both tanks have good armor, leopard has got bigger main gun,

    leopard has better mobility and it uses less fuel. then leopard has got better ballistic computer and gun stabilation. so what makes abrams better. USA propaganda maybe?

  • @Artist334 It doesn't have a bigger gun, just a longer barrel, Abrams is a heavy assault tank while this is a medium tank, two different comparisons.

  • @Piemonkey117

    Both Abrams and Leopard are classified as MBT's. Leo is not a medium tank , never was.

  • @Artist334

    No the Leopard doesn't have the bigger gun anymore. The US is using the Leopards :-P Leopard wins, Abrams fails..

  • crap music

  • damn its fast.

  • german tank technology was is and will always be better than others (spescifecly russan tanks). sorry for bad english

  • @369NICK963

    The nazis said the same,that was true until the soviets optimized the T-34.

  • @ViriathusVingathor the t-34 was a good tank but the tiger was still better. The russians and americans just outnumbered the (king) tiger so it didn't had a chance. the german tanks were still better at the end of the war.

    (i'm not german)

  • @369NICK963

    Thats true,however the King Tiger was just slightly better,and the T-34 was by far the easier to produce,that also counts.

  • @ViriathusVingathor well the (king) tiger was way better if you put them up in a 1 vs 1 fight.

    but becouse the russians had almost 7 times as much t-34s than the germans had (king) tigers (on the eastern front) the germans had no chance at all. (i'm not german)

  • leopard 2 is swedish

  • chinaownseverything

    yea its true german has the best tanks

  • Does L2A6 has some active protective system like the Russian Shtora or Arena ?

  • tiger beats sherman

    leopard beats abrahams

    bottom line

    german tanks beat american, because:

    german tanks are made by smartass germen scientist's, with state of the art technology

    american tanks are made by fat ass americans with amican technology, a donut, and the more is better attitude. (more horsepower? lets put a jet engine in a tank. result: plane's aa misile's lock on to tanks..)

  • @militair9 dude ur an idiot

  • @Tankband01 no ur an idiot!

  • @militair9 artard. one shot to the side from an ,ABRAHAMS!!! and its owned

  • @chevyladtallyhoe abra-who? a guy with a stinger missile will take their ass down! and leopard 2 a 6 has better range and is way more reliable!

  • @militair9

    I agree that the Leo is better, but a Stinger is an Anti-Aircraft GM. So it's not for anti-armor purpose (: