Added: 10 months ago
From: civilnuts
Views: 14,982
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (90)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Why would you let the naked guy drive your chariot!?!?

  • @JohnnyMc96

    It is a sign of masculinity. The tattoos that they adorn are regarded as protection from the Gods so they believe they did not need armor.

    The tattoos also symbolize a warriors status and skill.

  • @Gronarix well i get that part, I was just saying get a guy who can match the intimidation of the tattoos.

  • The only thing that they got wrong with this simulation was that the first Celt that got shot with the arrow was a fatass. Celts are supposed to be jacked!

  • how the heck did that tiny man rank as a celt??

  • 1:41 was the celt using a shillelagh? if he was thats easily shattered ribs for the persian when he thumps him one

    like to see anyone, immortal or not get back up after that

  • Most people don't know that the Persian Immortals didn't suffer that great of loss against the Spartans in Thermopylae. The Greek historian who wrote of the account was known to exaggerate many things in his stories, making it seem like each Spartan killed 4 quadrillion Persians. Sadly, most of us are taught the baised version in school which leads us to believe that the Spartans were a lot stronger than they actually were.

  • @martialartsman627 The Spartans were strong, it wasn't 300 vs 1 million like the movie claims, it was about 10,000 vs anywhere upwards of 100,000 (only 300 of those 10,000 were Spartan warriors). The Spartans were some of the most well trained warriors of all time, no exaggeration. The Persians lost nothing at Thermopylae, but the rest Greece gained an overwhelming boost in morale, which is paramount in every war. Dunno how this ties to Celts though.

  • Biased fight! The Persian was useless on his own and ALWAYS fought in numbers! the Celt fought by himself and he would have been stronger,faster,fitter the Persian on the other hand was weak,not very fast and was hopeless on his own in this sort of situation!!

  • Persia was big, But not very impressive. The spartans were OBVIOUSLY more immortal than those guys.

  • The celts beat the Romans because they used GEURILLA TACTICS. In a 1-on1, it'd be interesting.

    Persian Immortales were NOBLEMAN. They probably receive military training at an early age. And those wicker sheild are more durable than they look.

    In conclusion, it'd be down to the skill of the individual.

  • How the fuck did the Persians Wicker-Basket armor even protect him??

  • this is bullshit the celtic is bigger faster smarter and stronger by nature the only warrior that would be a great challenge would be a viking this was bullshit

  • unless we have a time traveling system then we will know.

  • celts were so tough the would pwn persian poop

  • disagree

  • callin bs

  • 1:18 owned :D

  • He said parsa when he killed the guy not sparta or awsome!!!

  • This show is a fucking disgrace...

  • Did he say awesome when he killed that guy?

  • @SwordsmanMercenary I coul have sworn I heard Sparta

  • absolute bullshit. a Celt would batter the persian to pieces, because they had superior fighting skills, strenght and experiance.

  • @Rivannous Plus the fact that the Celts were able to keep the Romans out of their territory for so long.

  • Celts were stronger than immortals,they defeated the Greeks,several times,entered Anatolia,and made a kingdom there,which despite small lasted for long,amongst supposedly far more advanced kingdoms and Empires.

  • The Persian Immortal would have never even gotten close to a Celt. The Celt would have beat the living humus out of him and then cut his head off. There's a reason why the Celts kicked Rome's ass for so many centuries.

  • why are all these warriors hard to defeat. In history they were easily defeated but no its as hard as trying to melt a lightsaber in this show

  • the immortal sounded american when he said, "Parsa!"

  • @kingofladies04 That's because every singe one of these "actors" is American.

  • Of course the Persian won, are you joking? Sure, not the entire Persian army was compromised of elite soldiers, but they damn well had extremely skilled warriors. A skilled Persian warrior against a barbaric Celt? You must be kidding me. The Persians were much more advanced, organized and civilized. Read a history book people, instead of getting pissed that the white guy didn't win because he's prettier.

  • @wowhamba Civility has nothing to do with being decapitated by a Celtic blade. Also you contradicted yourself rather well in your second sentence. Celts were head hunters, you mean to tell me that they lack skill when it is their hobby to collect human heads? Fact: This whole show is a load of bullshit because no one really knows who would win unless it was a completely biased fight (like a caveman vs SAS situation). In my opinion the Celt would've won, rather easily I may add.

  • I thought Celtic warriors were extremely ripped? There is no way that Celt would look that skinny in Deadliest Warrior

  • Training means nothing against a person whos life is better than your training. Why do you think Ethiopians win marathons?

  • Spartan eats immortals for breakfast ;d

  • when he had the spear it could have gone right thru the wicker work shield like wtf!

  • the celt was missing a sheald and i do baleave that they had a claymore sword.

  • They didnt give the celt anything interesting i mean sling, sword, spear, club; he should hav had a sledgehammer

  • That was pure bullshit, Persian Immortals were called Immortal because the army was huge and they were basically instantly replaced if they died. Due to this, 50% of them were badly trained and weren't all that good at fighting. Celts have better weaponry, armour and fighting skill, Celts wear cloth armour. If these guys played Age of empires this show would be much more correct.

  • luckypersian persian immortals werent strong there were just much of them and celts yeah they use much to win primitive

  • ok no chance pesain imortal winning the celt cut him an inch away from the heart he shuold hve won

  • Civilized > Barbaric

    Thats why Rome got so big, they were a very orginized civilization fighting agaisnt barbarians. Only reason they lost was because of the sheer amount of the barbarians and Rome having retarded leaders drive it into the ground.

  • Immortals weren't on chariots!

    And which one looks more civilized!

    HAH!

    Persians look un-civilized

  • you compare the size and physical attributes the celt warrior had and his sheer fighting spirit against a persian immortal the celt would crush him

  • The Immortals weren't actually that terribly great. The only reason why they were called Immortals was due to the sheer size of the Persian Army and how easy it was to replace the fallen. The Celt should have won due to the fact that a Persian would've been used to fighting with fear (hence the infamous title Immortal). Against a Celt (who fights on a more primitive nature and shows virtually no fear) it would've been near impossible for the Persian to win.

  • @bloomy2293 thats al true but if you have saw al the fights you see that al te berserk type warriors lose

  • @rikgales123 And your point is? This entire show is bullshit because no one actually knows who would win unless it was a completely biased fight (like a caveman and a bloody marine). The Celt would've won and anyone who believes otherwise (in my own opinion) is a fool.

  • @bloomy2293 A Fool? No, just educated in Persian history. Learn some.

  • @Tareltonlives They were famous for numbers, not fighting ability. What research did you do? Wikipedia? Or some biased trash? Either way in a 1 vs 1, he would've lost.

  • @Tareltonlives Immortals werent that amazing. they were more skilled then the infantry made up of conscripts and slaves but their greatest advantage stemed from their reputation which came from the accounts of their enemies who whould cut one down and then he'd suddenly be fighting the same man or some BS like that. they all dressed the same and had the same equipment and were relentless as hell, the reputation was crushing to the morale of thier enemies, the "of crap they'r invincible" effect.

  • @bloomy2293 Due some research on the Persian Immortals. They were elite troops.

  • @Tareltonlives Also, if they were 'Elite' troops, why the fuck didn't they destroy the greeks at Thermopylae? After all they were half the strength of the Immortals, and even then Xerxes had to use a literal crap tonne of basic infantry and archers. You should educate yourself before trying to do so to me.

  • @bloomy2293 agreed, no way a pissed off Celtic warrior is going to lose to a Persian.

  • @bloomy2293 celt vas kinda badass and fearless but imortals where 11000persian army was huge and well trained,imortalls where best of the best soooooooooo its clear why they won

  • @legostopmotions011 Immortals weren't the best of the best. Period. Also this is (as you clearly haven't noticed) one vs one. Also there were only 10, 000 Immortals at a time. Learn to spell, learn to argue, and generally learn a fair amount of ancient world history.

  • @bloomy2293 It was more reputation because no matter what there were ALWAYS 10,000 Persian Immortals and the enemy NEVER saw any of them dead, making it seem that they could never be killed. And don't forget that the Persian was more disciplined than the Celt who was used to charging into battle as we saw and had better weapons. I still agree that the Celt SHOULD have been MUCH harder to beat.

  • @bloomy2293

    Have you been watching 300?

  • @bloomy2293 couldnt have agreed more

  • @bloomy2293

    i totally agree...this video is fiction...

  • @bloomy2293 I am from the isle of man (extremely celtic) and i have to say, once seeing my mate being taken out by a cowardly bastard 'Immortal' arrow, i'd get the celtic blood up, whip out the sword and charge without fear of death at my enemy. If i died, i'd meet my mate, so what the hey. We should have won through sheer frightening effect anyway. Look at us. Mess with me, bitch?! :L

  • @bloomy2293 I disagree. This fight is actuall kind of interesting.

    The Immortales were Persian (maybe some allied too) nobleman. They would have been given military training at an early age. And that whicker sheild and armor is actuall more durable than it looks.

    Of course, the celts were raised warriors toothiswouldbewhoevrissmartr

  • @bloomy2293 Celts were notorious for running away- the celts had no army, they had a millitia.

    The Persians too were mostly a militia, so it is very hard to say who would win in a one on one fight. But a richer celtic warrior and a persian immortan might be on par. Armywise, the persians would win.

  • @Caradepato2 Celts were the dominant force in pre-Roman Europe. They lived in inter-connected tribes and they also had specialised warriors as well as militia. Celtic kings used to split their territory between their sons when they died. This ultimately led to the isolation of tribes from other Celts, which in turn led to their eventual displacement by the Romans. Britons (Celts who had migrated to Britain), specifically the South Wales Silurians, resisted Roman rule for decades.

  • @welshforever95 yes, all true. I am not knowledgable as i would like about the inland celts, i know more of my acesters in the celtiberians and the lusitanians. But that does not change the fact that their armies were mainly militia. Just like everyplace. I wasnt saying against as much as i was speaking my mind, if you understand me.

  • @Caradepato2 But when the Romans eventually did come to control Britain the Britons had no real reason to fight as they were protected by the Roman Empire. Without war the Britons developed culturally, linguistically and, believe it or not, technologically. However this meant that when the Romans left the Britons were vulnerable to attack by the Gaels (Irish Celts) and Anglo-Saxons.

    You said "Celts were notorious for running away". I haven't heard this myself, but these are possible reasons why.

  • @welshforever95 What i really meant is that, like all militia armies, celts had discipline problems compared to romans and the like. And you are right in that romans kept their power diplomatically as well as millitiarily in most places. What you have to understand is that many celtic tribes, especially ones in britain and gaul, essentially lacked a proffesional core that some others like the Boii possessed.

  • the persians would have won simply coz of the fact that they were trained soldiers.

  • its pretty realistic until the persian gets out of the chariots

  • The Celts should have won because of their physical advantage. The show is Deadliest WARRIOR, not Deadliest WEAPON.

  • Spartan wins haha

  • Why the hell am I watching this?

  • Might have to call bs on this one

  • @newt624 yeah, I call bs

  • No top comment... uh... Hi?

  • Celts aren't cave men. The majority of them were farmers but during the roman invasion of Britain the Scottish celts became guerella soldiers and were so effective that they manage to keep the worlds greatest war machine out of Scotland. And Ireland is a Celtic nation but not where the celts came from

  • @iJack97 dont forget the welsh celts who probebly got drunk and shot loads of arrows :P

  • @iJack97 who start up the woad warrior tradition then?

  • The celts were fearless fuckers haha im a little bit dead in side now coz the celt died and my family originated from Ireland soo yea :( in my heart the celts kick ass

  • persian soldiers are prefesion warriors celt soldiers are a buntch of cave men

  • @edgarassasa you & your family would know about cave men being that you are. This was bullshit, & the only reason you're saying anything to the contrary is because you're probably from the persian region. Any celt, any day would demolish a persian anything, especially with the burda. this was bs because it completely contradicted all of the tests they did.

  • Chuck Norris vs Osama Bin Laden

  • @nintendoawsomeman of course chuck is gona win

  • @nintendoawsomeman thats not even a fight chuck norrirs hands down

  • @nintendoawsomeman osama isnt persian

  • very true, never saw the celt havin a chance

  • celt doesnt have nearly as much skill as the persion, it happened exactly the way it would in real life.

  • immortal for a reason lol

  • what do you expect, tv, to tell the truth.

  • never would of happen like that lol

  • DEFINITELY NOOOOOOTT

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more