I live in turkey and i remember this demolition from the news. That building was an old factory from the 20's and it was dangerous to the other buildings to just raze it or something like that, so they did this. Building didn't collapsed, it was all planned and no one got hurt.
You guys all suck and all of your's mother doing a barrel roll with a penis in her pussy. This is not funny man. We aren't loughing all 9/11 videos. Be serious, its a collapse. Someone in that building died (or would die) and you all loughing. Thats terrible.
@bobbyr1115 That's exactly my point,, Dork! I suppose America needs to take over that also, not just run the economy and be the world's police. I can just here the comments now, "who ask America to do allof that?" Answer,, well about half of the nations in the world have and one time or another and the other hald are the ones that need policing.
suprisingly i want a natural disaster to hit me i want to see if i could survive :D i wuold like to be in that biulding and try to survive. weather does not scare me as long as i have a mountain nearby :D. i got a question for viewers thumbs up if u would take ur pet with u during a tornado warning to ur shelter
@MisinfoDebunker Neither do a lot of people. At least nothing they can put on a badge or accent their signatures with. Doesn't mean they can't use reason in place of authority, or that it's OK to lie to them on TV. Is your Debunker's Licence valid?
hmmm. I thought physics dictated it would collapse straight down into its own footprint at free-fall speed like the trade center buildings. I guess physics are back to normal and only appear to change during terrorist attacks.
@MisinfoDebunker You're right, it couldn't be. Unless of course, physics isn't equal among different buildings. So according to your logic, nothing on earth is created equal to these buildings, as all 3 of them (and only these 3 buildings before and since) were extremely "special".
Well, nothing on earth has been damaged in the way these buildings were. Of course, that doesn't matter. Clearly, every situation of collapses are equal.
@MisinfoDebunker And not many buildings are designed to take a hit by a plane as these were, but regardless, when the top started to topple over it should have continued to do so. Building 7 surely wouldn't have "fallen" the way it did given what little damage it had. The scientific evidence simply does not support the official story. If you're going to try your hand at "debunking", at least bring some common sense and science to the table. If you prefer to live in denial, knock yourself out.
The scientific evidence does not support it? Are you a scientist? American Society of Civil Engineers (which is the largest professional engineering society), Popular Mechanics, Purdue University, NIST, FEMA sure seem to think so.
@MisinfoDebunker Yes, most "independent" scientists don't support it. Common sense doesn't support it. Witness testimony doesn't support it. You seem to rely on government connected/funded scientists with a conflict of interest. I'm not a scientist, but I do have a good understanding of physics since I design physics for racing simulators. One doesn't have to be a scientist to use common sense and given this is something you appear to lack, I highly doubt you are a scientist either.
Most independent scientists don't support it? Man, conspiracy theorists are in such denial, it's ridiculous. I guess the largest society in engineering, the ASCE isn't independent. You got some researching to do buddy.
@MisinfoDebunker Yes, research is a good thing because clearly if you had researched this you wouldn't be defending the "conspiracy theory" that is the official story, unless you had some agenda or were purely delusional. You conspiracy theorists certainly are in denial, I completely agree.
Sorry bud, but by definition the official story is not a conspiracy theory. As I have said, the ASCE, Popular Mechanics, Purdue University have done their independent investigation and have made simulations or explanations of how the buildings fell in that manner. You guys have no such independent investigation nor do you have any simulations on how the buildings fell as a result of CD. You don't want a new investigation, just one that agrees with you. Silly conspiracy theorist.
@MisinfoDebunker You choose only to read the info that you feel matches your predetermined beliefs yet ignore the obvious like building 7, the Pentagon, witness testimony, and the list goes on. Clearly, a simulation is all the proof you need. You are blind to the "conspiracy theory" of a group of men who couldn't fly, expertly flying these planes into these targets. Again, you are welcome to your delusions and to live in denial. Your choice to be a closed-minded serf is of course your own.
Building 7 has also been explained. Pentagon too. If the explosions the witnesses heard were actually explosives then they would have hearing impairment. The fact that they came out well is proof that they weren't explosives. They are astonishingly loud and intense.
@MisinfoDebunker There is no logical evidence that supports your so-called "explanations". Your lack of understanding of physics is quite surprising.
No airplane parts that belong to the plane that reportedly hit the Pentagon. For starters watch the following witness (a Pentagon employee). Then search "911 pentagon witness" for many more.
watch?v=QeTEOdAPKSU
You'll ignore all the evidence and witnesses (including firemen and police) just to maintain your delusion.
@GovOfWolves Why should we listen to a bunch of idiots that are parroting what some idiot like you told them? We can just watch the damn videos of the plane impacts for ourselves. Jesus, you truthers have got to be the dumbest people alive. Do the world a favor and DONT BREED
@Baronstone And yet the majority of engineers, scientists, demo experts, and eye witnesses disagree with the official report, but your I.Q. is so low that you can only absorb what the government and MSM tell you. Enjoy your serfdom; it suits you well.
@GovOfWolves I know it'll make you very unhappy to hear it, but we in fact DON'T live in a world of James Bond villians, with infinite resources and hundreds of mindlessly loyal henchmen all of whom will not say a word. BTW, how come they can successfully pull off putting a hole where 2000+ people used to be in broad daylight, yet can't assassinate people trying to get the "truth" out like Michael Moore, whom is a walking plausible heart attack, and the moron behind "Loose Change?"
@MazJax Apparently the word "majority" has no real meaning to you... 250 million? What a joke. I love how you Serfs quote facts from your a s s like it's truth, and you actually believe the garbage you spew. Common sense has little meaning to someone like yourself who just throws numbers out of his a s s. So yes, statements like yours makes a low I.Q. quite evident.
@GovOfWolves And what did you say? That entire paragraph was nothing but calling my TRUE statement garbage, you hypocrit. Only around 1600 structural scientists WORLDWIDE signed a petition to re-investigate 911. The rest of the scientists in the world strongly disagree with their stupid claims. In comparison, 1600 < 250 million
Do you not understand that 1600 scientists is an incredibly small number when comparing to # of worldwide scientists?
@GovOfWolves It's funny how you truthers think the government is like an evil organization with henchmen, a Dr. Evil style boss who are set on nothing but gaining money, like in a movie. But coming from someone named "GovOfWolves" there's no way anyone can take you seriously. Enjoy your James Bond films.
@MazJax The truthers are insane because their claims about 9/11 makes no sense. However, that the government has a habit to lie to start wars is an obvious fact. They lied about WMD to start the Iraq war. They lied about the Tomkin bay incident to start the Vietnam war. So if something happens that a government takes as an excuse to start a war, it is insane not not to doubt them. The government can't be trusted when it comes to such serious matters.
@AngeCord What I meant was that the government would never do something as drastic as kill 3000 of its own people people in a mass attack just to start a war. I can fully understand how they can lie about wmd's or fake a few deaths, but not blatantly kill 3000 people in their own towers.
@GovOfWolves There are statistically around 250 million experts in the field of science and engineering worldwide. This includes civil engineers, architects, chemists, doctors, etc. Out of all these, around 1600 are hardcore "truthers."
Who's on the truther side? 1 or 2 structural engineers, and several other scientists. Not to mention those who THINK they know so much about civil engineering and structures like that retard Jason Bermas or Steven Jones and his husband Alex Jones.
@MisinfoDebunker I see, so what you are saying is that all the YouTube videos of the simulations you speak of, NIST/PM reports, and news media reports that support your conspiracy theory are "non-professional" and not to be trusted.
In conspiracy theorists' fantasy professional sources don't count. Silly conspiracy theorist. You should try going to college. That or at least you can read on the various professional groups such as the ASCE, which you are completely ignorant of. Once your level of incompetence lands you in poverty, I suggest you sell. That is, if you have anything to sell.
@AlmostCommon Yes, I have a woodstove and exploit that effect (on a small scale) often. I have no problem believing that SOME sections of steel would have gotten hot enough to buckle under the pressure. But I can't fathom ALL the steel weakening equally and somehow steadily breaking apart in sync at the same speed all the way down. No leaning or tipping. How hot could it have been hundreds of feet below the fire?
@Inediblehulk Friction=heat. if you watch the video carefully, there was tipping and twisting. You can see the roof falling down/in to the side, not straight down.
@Strideo1 Actually, most skyscrapers (or any buildings) are designed to NOT collapse or fall over at all. And the tower wouldn't have toppled over like this, regardless of materials, unless the plane hit it at the bottom somehow. The logical thing for the towers to do would have been to smolder, smoke and burn out standing. But they obviously didn't.
@Inediblehulk If you've ever worked around a furnace, and understand how high speed oxygen can effect the temperature of a flame in an enclosed area then you might understand why the steel failed.
The hole funneled the wind into the flame and created a furnace effect. The smoke doesn't rise, it pushes out the side of the building and blows away. It must have been quite windy that day.
Dominick629 Whether it's nonsense or not, it's not MY nonsense, and I'm not selling anything. So I don't see how I'm lucky. And yes, there are plenty of idiots who believe the WTC towers were demolished, but no more per capita than on the other side. Maybe less. Other groups containing idiots include millionaires, the elderly, painters, white kids and people wearing red. In other words, don't generalize.
WOW! Amazingly strong construction! Is that a bomb shelter or what? i never see so huge building structure remain intact after such impact! For ingenering purpose, i like to know more it's what built! Definitely extreme earthquake resistrance! The people who built this was very crafty!
Was it on purpose or by accident? I thought the building was going to roll-over into the other building. I'm hoping there were no people in it for the ride of their life.
I have been living on the top floor since years. And now it is my turn to live on the ground floor while staying in the same flat I've been living since years xD
This must be a fake? The concrete should have pulverized into powder, and beams should have been ejected laterally in all directions. In addition, the whole thing should have turned to rubble, and there should have been molten steel underneath with fires burning for weeks! What is more, a simple comparison to WTC 7 in New York shows that a building with scooped out damage has to collapse straight DOWN... not tip over in the direction of the "scooped out" damage! No,must be something wrong here!
@organisten well, its clearly is not a fake video, and remember the dynamics of a collapse become different with size and differences in building material and design. this building is about 11 floors the one your talking about was fifty.
@michaeldublg no, you just don't understand irony. As for the size and differences, have you personally experience in this? If not, I prefer to trust those who do - like the 1346 *verified" professional architechts and engineers who want a new investigation.
They obviously thought it would tip over and then crumble into a million pieces but it was just too strong. Poor planning on the part of the engineers.
So, in Turkey, a building can survive a tumble like that but, in the USA, the weight of falling floors instantly vaporize the ones right below it with no resistance? I sure hope Turkish engineers are building the new World Trade Center.
@Inediblehulk You dolt! If they'd built the World Trade Center that way then the buildings would have toppled over and crushed other builds and people. Skyscrapers are designed to collapse straight down for a reason.
@Inediblehulk How come on every small building fail video on youtube there is some moron ignorantly & offensively comparing it to the WTC disaster?! I have an idea- let's stick YOU in a rocket & fly you into the surface of the sun. Then later we can watch the video & compare it to smacking a couple of matchbox cars together on my livingroom carpet. Because I'm sure that must have the exact same physical forces at work
@leapingoutofwater Partly because videos like these tend to naturally beg the questions. Partly because some things should be nagged about ad nauseum. Partly plain old idiotic Alex Jones fans. Partly to hear the other side of the argument. On that note, you make your point well! But I never said this small building and the twin towers were completely identical, in form or fate. But yes, some characteristics CAN be scaled up or down for comparison with each other, and they don't jive.
@jwhite0398 I'm aware there's a strong possibility of demolition. Plenty of circumstantial evidence, and plenty of holes in the official story, but no solid proof. Yet.
@jwhite0398 That's interesting news for me. You mean, the terrorists landed inside the buildings with their planes and started putting some explosives there? You are Thomas Kean, aren't you?
@Inediblehulk How can you even compare a building that was 110 stories tall and weighed 500,000 TONS to a dinky short building that barely had 10 stories like that? dee dee dee
@Jimbogf Easy. I look at one, then the other and analyze the similarities AND differences. Comparison doesn't equal equation. Obviously, there are huge differences and I don't claim otherwise, or say this video is any sort of proof of anything. But it does have hints in it.
Hints? What are you talking about?! Do you have any clue of the topic a bit? Structure engineering and related field? Behavior of different scale, differently composed, various material made constructions? Just to scratch the surface of the topic.
Your comparisons so far indicate only lack of knowledge, you have no idea what you are trying to talk about..
But that's what happen when someone 'analyze' after random online videos. Brave. Dumb, but brave.
@racztomi I'm no expert in engineering by a longshot, but I know what I know. And I admit there's far more I don't know than I do. I've seen a lot of things fall down/break/crush other things/etc, and while I don't know the exact formulas and algorithms at work, they always seem to go down the way I expect they should, or at least in a way that seems to make sense after I think about it for nine years. The onus is on someone to convincingly explain the fall to me, not the other way around.
@Inediblehulk The topic is too broad to explain to you, people are trained on this for years. If it is really important for you to understand, you should take the courses and learn all the effects, conditions, aspects that affect the behavior of a structure.
The point is actually that there are no exact formulas to describe the behavior of one particular building. The conditions are wildly different, even in case of identical designs there are differences. No way you can build real theories!!
Do a barrel roll!
MrCheshireCats 1 week ago
Çok sağlam binalar yapıyoruz da zemin kötü! Ne yapacaksın işte! :p
dkoah 3 weeks ago
turkish demolition lmfaoo
greekman3000 1 month ago
Oh well, I suppose 'building rolled' video is better than a 'Rick rolled' one.....
digitalbroadcaster 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Gonna be hard getting used to living upside down, the most annoying part is going to the bathroom.
GamleErik100 1 month ago
Comment removed
GamleErik100 1 month ago
"Do a Barrel roll"
RademacherChris 1 month ago
chuck norris kick it on the other side
shadowwolf2334 1 month ago 2
Made in Turkey. Crazy Turks...
ssemre1889 2 months ago
pulea xD
Onecky1 2 months ago
Battlefield 3.
MortalKombat313 2 months ago
thumbs up if u think turkys are hard build now .
MrAmsterdamse 2 months ago
Plane coming! Do a barrel roll!
michaelm0522 2 months ago
Comment removed
michaelm0522 2 months ago
That's one way to kill the paperboy!
AlexD0e 2 months ago
LUCKY IT DIDNT TOPPLE THE OTHER BUILDING
ajs3939 2 months ago
sand niggers doin dey thang!
nigouer 2 months ago
Only in Turkey :D
2southdragon 3 months ago
BOWLING TIME!!!!!!!!!
polgabice 3 months ago
wot do they hold their buildings together with ? turkey spit !
SIMKOI 3 months ago
thats cool how it doesnt break
utubefun1234 3 months ago
ulan çankırı oyun havası arıyordum nerelere geldim :)
ulgozob000 3 months ago
DO A BARRER ROLL!
Aggelosmj 3 months ago
Angry Bird hits the building ...
thesigncom 3 months ago
eve bak amq acayip yapilmis yikilmiyo ist türk gücü budur altan kirilir ama yinede saglam kalir!!!!
Mustafa1229 3 months ago
DEMO. FAIL!
17143972290 3 months ago
thats one tuff building
grikney 4 months ago
I live in turkey and i remember this demolition from the news. That building was an old factory from the 20's and it was dangerous to the other buildings to just raze it or something like that, so they did this. Building didn't collapsed, it was all planned and no one got hurt.
Edirneli 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i wouldn't want to be sitting in the toilet when my building rolled like that
bnkrmike29 4 months ago
Comment removed
bnkrmike29 4 months ago
You guys all suck and all of your's mother doing a barrel roll with a penis in her pussy. This is not funny man. We aren't loughing all 9/11 videos. Be serious, its a collapse. Someone in that building died (or would die) and you all loughing. Thats terrible.
TerrariaMaster101 4 months ago
Do a Barrel Roll!!!
dudey7ftw 4 months ago
hahaha
CarlosBcn1989 4 months ago
fail
stanley459800 4 months ago
Building 7
thedukedubstep 4 months ago
they tryed to simulate the 9/11 physic .. and they fail
65465468 5 months ago
just look at the strength of this old building. thats amazing
TheScorpp 5 months ago 4
do a barrel roll!
Stuntpiloot05 5 months ago
dont worry we will send support...........NAHHHHHH!
israel {:
dramabringer 5 months ago
Do a barrel roll!
Xiolar0eu 5 months ago
I had the basement, now I have a penthouse
MysticDMBherb 5 months ago 13
@MysticDMBherb
Yes BUT unfortunately someone had a penthouse but now he has a basement. From the outhouse to the penthouse and visa versa. Oh well that's life.
beyondonethousand 4 days ago
Rollin' Rollin' Rollin' Rawhide!
bubblybabs 5 months ago
turkish noob construction
GravityPowerful 6 months ago
what if you were on that building on the right, looking out the window?
evrythingelswastaken 6 months ago
DAD PUN WARNING:
I've heard of flipping condos, but this is ridiculous!
shipmaker14 6 months ago
I think that building should have been kept!. It was so strong it didn't even crumble as it rolled.!
Rhal95 6 months ago 2
gimme a roll sweetie!
NymphetamineTR 6 months ago
OMGG"??? is the building ok??
kreedzmedia 6 months ago
That building to the right is very lucky.
poodtang1 6 months ago
They see me rollin', they hatin'
lordoflinerider 6 months ago 60
THe building has to be really strong for it to roll like that. Such irony.
yuujin7788 6 months ago
KATAMARI DAMACY!
TheCGIMaster 7 months ago
will it blend?
SetForTheSky1 8 months ago
you see these screw ups everywhere except America. Obviously nobody else knows what they are doing.
falonhall59 8 months ago
@falonhall59 you want to see screw up check out americas murder and crime rate compared to the world... thats a screw up, u fuckin hill billy...
NRIautos 6 months ago
@falonhall59 There are barely any building regulations in most countries, dummy
bobbyr1115 6 months ago
@bobbyr1115 That's exactly my point,, Dork! I suppose America needs to take over that also, not just run the economy and be the world's police. I can just here the comments now, "who ask America to do allof that?" Answer,, well about half of the nations in the world have and one time or another and the other hald are the ones that need policing.
falonhall59 6 months ago
suprisingly i want a natural disaster to hit me i want to see if i could survive :D i wuold like to be in that biulding and try to survive. weather does not scare me as long as i have a mountain nearby :D. i got a question for viewers thumbs up if u would take ur pet with u during a tornado warning to ur shelter
winnieizcool 8 months ago
TIMMMBERRRRRR!!!!!
Mr7475ih 9 months ago
The building decides to change sides like how we change sides for our bedsheet once in a while...
hAhan17 9 months ago
This is the only kind of movement we're seeing in real estate these days
joesmoe71 9 months ago
imagine taking a shit when that happens
haikaelong 9 months ago
well heres ur problem thers a giant hole in ur buildin u should hav that looked at (sees building fall) never mind the is gone hav a good day
infamous071 9 months ago
Well i know why it collapsed.It is easy to understand ... Chuck Norris had sex after a fight XD
Mrkostasable 9 months ago
fake !
nec123tr 10 months ago
over desinged peice of shit
dravidr007 10 months ago
Silly building, you aren't supposed to roll. You're not even a wheel.
MazJax 10 months ago 106
tiiiiiiimbeeeeer!
Jobo7034 10 months ago
'
wow this building is so strong
bestamerica 11 months ago
@MisinfoDebunker Neither do a lot of people. At least nothing they can put on a badge or accent their signatures with. Doesn't mean they can't use reason in place of authority, or that it's OK to lie to them on TV. Is your Debunker's Licence valid?
Inediblehulk 11 months ago
hmmm. I thought physics dictated it would collapse straight down into its own footprint at free-fall speed like the trade center buildings. I guess physics are back to normal and only appear to change during terrorist attacks.
GovOfWolves 11 months ago
@GovOfWolves
Or maybe not all collapses and all buildings are created equal. Nah, that couldn't be.
MisinfoDebunker 11 months ago
@MisinfoDebunker You're right, it couldn't be. Unless of course, physics isn't equal among different buildings. So according to your logic, nothing on earth is created equal to these buildings, as all 3 of them (and only these 3 buildings before and since) were extremely "special".
GovOfWolves 11 months ago
@GovOfWolves
Well, nothing on earth has been damaged in the way these buildings were. Of course, that doesn't matter. Clearly, every situation of collapses are equal.
MisinfoDebunker 11 months ago
@MisinfoDebunker And not many buildings are designed to take a hit by a plane as these were, but regardless, when the top started to topple over it should have continued to do so. Building 7 surely wouldn't have "fallen" the way it did given what little damage it had. The scientific evidence simply does not support the official story. If you're going to try your hand at "debunking", at least bring some common sense and science to the table. If you prefer to live in denial, knock yourself out.
GovOfWolves 11 months ago
@GovOfWolves
The scientific evidence does not support it? Are you a scientist? American Society of Civil Engineers (which is the largest professional engineering society), Popular Mechanics, Purdue University, NIST, FEMA sure seem to think so.
MisinfoDebunker 11 months ago
@MisinfoDebunker Yes, most "independent" scientists don't support it. Common sense doesn't support it. Witness testimony doesn't support it. You seem to rely on government connected/funded scientists with a conflict of interest. I'm not a scientist, but I do have a good understanding of physics since I design physics for racing simulators. One doesn't have to be a scientist to use common sense and given this is something you appear to lack, I highly doubt you are a scientist either.
GovOfWolves 11 months ago
@GovOfWolves
Most independent scientists don't support it? Man, conspiracy theorists are in such denial, it's ridiculous. I guess the largest society in engineering, the ASCE isn't independent. You got some researching to do buddy.
MisinfoDebunker 11 months ago
@MisinfoDebunker Yes, research is a good thing because clearly if you had researched this you wouldn't be defending the "conspiracy theory" that is the official story, unless you had some agenda or were purely delusional. You conspiracy theorists certainly are in denial, I completely agree.
GovOfWolves 11 months ago
@GovOfWolves
Sorry bud, but by definition the official story is not a conspiracy theory. As I have said, the ASCE, Popular Mechanics, Purdue University have done their independent investigation and have made simulations or explanations of how the buildings fell in that manner. You guys have no such independent investigation nor do you have any simulations on how the buildings fell as a result of CD. You don't want a new investigation, just one that agrees with you. Silly conspiracy theorist.
MisinfoDebunker 11 months ago
@MisinfoDebunker You choose only to read the info that you feel matches your predetermined beliefs yet ignore the obvious like building 7, the Pentagon, witness testimony, and the list goes on. Clearly, a simulation is all the proof you need. You are blind to the "conspiracy theory" of a group of men who couldn't fly, expertly flying these planes into these targets. Again, you are welcome to your delusions and to live in denial. Your choice to be a closed-minded serf is of course your own.
GovOfWolves 11 months ago
@GovOfWolves
Building 7 has also been explained. Pentagon too. If the explosions the witnesses heard were actually explosives then they would have hearing impairment. The fact that they came out well is proof that they weren't explosives. They are astonishingly loud and intense.
MisinfoDebunker 11 months ago
@MisinfoDebunker There is no logical evidence that supports your so-called "explanations". Your lack of understanding of physics is quite surprising.
No airplane parts that belong to the plane that reportedly hit the Pentagon. For starters watch the following witness (a Pentagon employee). Then search "911 pentagon witness" for many more.
watch?v=QeTEOdAPKSU
You'll ignore all the evidence and witnesses (including firemen and police) just to maintain your delusion.
GovOfWolves 11 months ago
@GovOfWolves Why should we listen to a bunch of idiots that are parroting what some idiot like you told them? We can just watch the damn videos of the plane impacts for ourselves. Jesus, you truthers have got to be the dumbest people alive. Do the world a favor and DONT BREED
Baronstone 9 months ago
@Baronstone And yet the majority of engineers, scientists, demo experts, and eye witnesses disagree with the official report, but your I.Q. is so low that you can only absorb what the government and MSM tell you. Enjoy your serfdom; it suits you well.
GovOfWolves 9 months ago
@GovOfWolves I know it'll make you very unhappy to hear it, but we in fact DON'T live in a world of James Bond villians, with infinite resources and hundreds of mindlessly loyal henchmen all of whom will not say a word. BTW, how come they can successfully pull off putting a hole where 2000+ people used to be in broad daylight, yet can't assassinate people trying to get the "truth" out like Michael Moore, whom is a walking plausible heart attack, and the moron behind "Loose Change?"
joesmoe71 9 months ago
@GovOfWolves Apparently the world "majority" has a different meaning to conspiracy theorists.
1800 (truther) scientists versus 250 million+ (sane) scientists.
If you don't recognize the majority, don't say other peoples' I.Qs are low.
MazJax 8 months ago
@MazJax Apparently the word "majority" has no real meaning to you... 250 million? What a joke. I love how you Serfs quote facts from your a s s like it's truth, and you actually believe the garbage you spew. Common sense has little meaning to someone like yourself who just throws numbers out of his a s s. So yes, statements like yours makes a low I.Q. quite evident.
GovOfWolves 8 months ago
@GovOfWolves And what did you say? That entire paragraph was nothing but calling my TRUE statement garbage, you hypocrit. Only around 1600 structural scientists WORLDWIDE signed a petition to re-investigate 911. The rest of the scientists in the world strongly disagree with their stupid claims. In comparison, 1600 < 250 million
Do you not understand that 1600 scientists is an incredibly small number when comparing to # of worldwide scientists?
MazJax 8 months ago
@GovOfWolves It's funny how you truthers think the government is like an evil organization with henchmen, a Dr. Evil style boss who are set on nothing but gaining money, like in a movie. But coming from someone named "GovOfWolves" there's no way anyone can take you seriously. Enjoy your James Bond films.
MazJax 8 months ago
@MazJax The truthers are insane because their claims about 9/11 makes no sense. However, that the government has a habit to lie to start wars is an obvious fact. They lied about WMD to start the Iraq war. They lied about the Tomkin bay incident to start the Vietnam war. So if something happens that a government takes as an excuse to start a war, it is insane not not to doubt them. The government can't be trusted when it comes to such serious matters.
AngeCord 8 months ago
@AngeCord What I meant was that the government would never do something as drastic as kill 3000 of its own people people in a mass attack just to start a war. I can fully understand how they can lie about wmd's or fake a few deaths, but not blatantly kill 3000 people in their own towers.
MazJax 8 months ago
@MazJax have you ever heard of the gulf of tonkin or operation northwoods, they are declassified look them up and see if you have the same answer
loonietunnes1 7 months ago
@GovOfWolves There are statistically around 250 million experts in the field of science and engineering worldwide. This includes civil engineers, architects, chemists, doctors, etc. Out of all these, around 1600 are hardcore "truthers."
Who's on the truther side? 1 or 2 structural engineers, and several other scientists. Not to mention those who THINK they know so much about civil engineering and structures like that retard Jason Bermas or Steven Jones and his husband Alex Jones.
MazJax 8 months ago
@GovOfWolves
But it's sad to see you'd trust Youtube videos over professional organizations. You must be a closed-minded serf to the Youtubers. Sad.
MisinfoDebunker 11 months ago
@MisinfoDebunker I see, so what you are saying is that all the YouTube videos of the simulations you speak of, NIST/PM reports, and news media reports that support your conspiracy theory are "non-professional" and not to be trusted.
When your IQ reaches 50, I suggest you sell.
GovOfWolves 11 months ago
@GovOfWolves
In conspiracy theorists' fantasy professional sources don't count. Silly conspiracy theorist. You should try going to college. That or at least you can read on the various professional groups such as the ASCE, which you are completely ignorant of. Once your level of incompetence lands you in poverty, I suggest you sell. That is, if you have anything to sell.
MisinfoDebunker 11 months ago
They just made another building
IndianInZurich 11 months ago
Here you go sir, we've just finished your new building.
GTR0134 1 year ago
Oups, demolition goes wrong :)
SebNormandy 1 year ago
LOL HAHAAHHAAHAH
oniejj 1 year ago
What is that building made of? I would have thought that the whole building would have crumbled instead of rolling like that.
Elmware 1 year ago
There is a brand new series of lessons teaching in Turkish university.....They call it Stupid Enginnering!!
33GeoStef33 1 year ago
JENGA
intratown 1 year ago
why did they demolish it if it was that solid? the building fucking rolled over thats almost inpossible..
t0xictreasure 1 year ago
It reminded me of a rubic cube !!!
maxime0999 1 year ago
DO A BARREL ROLL!!!!!!!!!111
mpchebe 1 year ago 23
@AlmostCommon Yes, I have a woodstove and exploit that effect (on a small scale) often. I have no problem believing that SOME sections of steel would have gotten hot enough to buckle under the pressure. But I can't fathom ALL the steel weakening equally and somehow steadily breaking apart in sync at the same speed all the way down. No leaning or tipping. How hot could it have been hundreds of feet below the fire?
Inediblehulk 1 year ago
@Inediblehulk Friction=heat. if you watch the video carefully, there was tipping and twisting. You can see the roof falling down/in to the side, not straight down.
leapingoutofwater 1 year ago
My neighbor exploded with oxygen...RIP
Ttubovoros 1 year ago
are muslims dress wearing ?
look & STFU! img205.imageshack.us/img205/4880/653608101nz.jpg
hellsingtr1907 1 year ago
Hahahahahahahaha stupid muslim bastards!!
coltsuperocean10 1 year ago
@coltsuperocean10 fucking racist , muslims are your dad .. son of a bitches
hellsingtr1907 1 year ago
@hellsingtr1907 hahahahahahahaha muslims are dress wearing shit smelling wife beating pedo worshipping bastards!!
coltsuperocean10 1 year ago
@Strideo1 Actually, most skyscrapers (or any buildings) are designed to NOT collapse or fall over at all. And the tower wouldn't have toppled over like this, regardless of materials, unless the plane hit it at the bottom somehow. The logical thing for the towers to do would have been to smolder, smoke and burn out standing. But they obviously didn't.
Inediblehulk 1 year ago
@Inediblehulk If you've ever worked around a furnace, and understand how high speed oxygen can effect the temperature of a flame in an enclosed area then you might understand why the steel failed.
The hole funneled the wind into the flame and created a furnace effect. The smoke doesn't rise, it pushes out the side of the building and blows away. It must have been quite windy that day.
AlmostCommon 1 year ago
LAF YOK LAN CANKIRIYA AMINIZI SIKERIM SIZIN AMINA KODUMUN GAVURLARI.
nemetth 1 year ago
Dominick629 Whether it's nonsense or not, it's not MY nonsense, and I'm not selling anything. So I don't see how I'm lucky. And yes, there are plenty of idiots who believe the WTC towers were demolished, but no more per capita than on the other side. Maybe less. Other groups containing idiots include millionaires, the elderly, painters, white kids and people wearing red. In other words, don't generalize.
Inediblehulk 1 year ago
If that's real it's one tough building.
ahz123 1 year ago
Do a barrel roll!
TheCollaredCrow 1 year ago 2
hahaha it just fell down like a box :P haha..just kept rolling Lol..
armandoc8737 1 year ago
ok wtf
DeathSymph0ny 1 year ago
chuck noris building.
117AsainBoy117 1 year ago
This happened when chuck norris gets rick roll'd
solantap 1 year ago
WOW! Amazingly strong construction! Is that a bomb shelter or what? i never see so huge building structure remain intact after such impact! For ingenering purpose, i like to know more it's what built! Definitely extreme earthquake resistrance! The people who built this was very crafty!
jimmypoulincriket 1 year ago
KATAMARI! :D
raven8dragon 1 year ago
barrel roll XD!
littlebritan 1 year ago
@littlebritan dont say that...
one person died in this accident
ZeroX1803 1 year ago
turkish quality? XD
predatortheme 1 year ago
Comment removed
nano1online 1 year ago
viva America!
nano1online 1 year ago
EXACTLY What should have happened to the upper portion of the WTC towers.
7Epitaph 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
TOP FIVE 911 TWOOFER LIES
1) Nanothermite (aka paint chips from PPG)
2) No flight 93 (despite 95% of plane debris recovered)
3) No flight 77 (even though over 130 witnesses saw a plane)
4) Marvin Bush WTC security (never happened)
5) Free fall speed (absolutely no building collapsed at freefall speed)
ctcole77 1 year ago
@7Epitaph Excellent comment !
revolutionpm 1 year ago
would have been fun to be tied down inside it
ryanair737400 1 year ago 3
@ryanair737400 tied down...gay
farenht456 11 months ago
@farenht456 you my good man are homosexual :L
ryanair737400 11 months ago
@ryanair737400 i dont see how but think what you want
farenht456 11 months ago
haha funny it just rolls away
MadHatter3112 1 year ago
Keep rolling rolling rolling rolling.....
Ma3Hu1 1 year ago 3
Was it on purpose or by accident? I thought the building was going to roll-over into the other building. I'm hoping there were no people in it for the ride of their life.
Have a Happy Day!
jethromayham 1 year ago
I don't see any planes.
TheFlyposter 1 year ago
I have been living on the top floor since years. And now it is my turn to live on the ground floor while staying in the same flat I've been living since years xD
kozeel 1 year ago
would make a good dice to giants :P
ThePluu 1 year ago
im sorry but it didnt collapse much, it looked like it rolled away to me...
LolzMouse 1 year ago 2
doesn't so much collapse as does a barrel roll
RooCHToTB 1 year ago
This must be a fake? The concrete should have pulverized into powder, and beams should have been ejected laterally in all directions. In addition, the whole thing should have turned to rubble, and there should have been molten steel underneath with fires burning for weeks! What is more, a simple comparison to WTC 7 in New York shows that a building with scooped out damage has to collapse straight DOWN... not tip over in the direction of the "scooped out" damage! No,must be something wrong here!
organisten 1 year ago
@organisten well, its clearly is not a fake video, and remember the dynamics of a collapse become different with size and differences in building material and design. this building is about 11 floors the one your talking about was fifty.
michaeldublg 1 year ago
@michaeldublg no, you just don't understand irony. As for the size and differences, have you personally experience in this? If not, I prefer to trust those who do - like the 1346 *verified" professional architechts and engineers who want a new investigation.
organisten 1 year ago
@organisten OOOOH ! your one of those .. people,, LOL .. I think I hear my mom calling me ..... by!
michaeldublg 1 year ago
"Ur doin it wrong..."
messdup1 1 year ago
Do a barrol roll!
meraged 1 year ago
They obviously thought it would tip over and then crumble into a million pieces but it was just too strong. Poor planning on the part of the engineers.
Qwiglee 1 year ago
So, in Turkey, a building can survive a tumble like that but, in the USA, the weight of falling floors instantly vaporize the ones right below it with no resistance? I sure hope Turkish engineers are building the new World Trade Center.
Inediblehulk 1 year ago 36
@Inediblehulk Idiotic comparison. Luckily for you, there are enough idiots here to buy into your nonsense.
Dominick629 1 year ago
@Inediblehulk You dolt! If they'd built the World Trade Center that way then the buildings would have toppled over and crushed other builds and people. Skyscrapers are designed to collapse straight down for a reason.
Strideo1 1 year ago
@Strideo1 ha hah hah ahahahahahahahaha aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa (draw breath) haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. WTC = controlled demolition.
AboutEnergy 1 year ago
@AboutEnergy Nice tinfoil hat.
Strideo1 1 year ago
@Strideo1 nice pre-programmed robotic cliche response. Baaaaaaaaaaaaa!! (and remember - everything is very normal, always)
AboutEnergy 1 year ago
@Inediblehulk How come on every small building fail video on youtube there is some moron ignorantly & offensively comparing it to the WTC disaster?! I have an idea- let's stick YOU in a rocket & fly you into the surface of the sun. Then later we can watch the video & compare it to smacking a couple of matchbox cars together on my livingroom carpet. Because I'm sure that must have the exact same physical forces at work
leapingoutofwater 1 year ago
@leapingoutofwater Partly because videos like these tend to naturally beg the questions. Partly because some things should be nagged about ad nauseum. Partly plain old idiotic Alex Jones fans. Partly to hear the other side of the argument. On that note, you make your point well! But I never said this small building and the twin towers were completely identical, in form or fate. But yes, some characteristics CAN be scaled up or down for comparison with each other, and they don't jive.
Inediblehulk 1 year ago
@Inediblehulk It wasn't the weight of the floors. The buldings were demolished by explosives. I hope you're aware of that.
jwhite0398 1 year ago
@jwhite0398 I'm aware there's a strong possibility of demolition. Plenty of circumstantial evidence, and plenty of holes in the official story, but no solid proof. Yet.
Inediblehulk 1 year ago
@jwhite0398 That's interesting news for me. You mean, the terrorists landed inside the buildings with their planes and started putting some explosives there? You are Thomas Kean, aren't you?
0x616861 1 year ago
@0x616861 Believe what you want, I don't feel like arguing about this.
jwhite0398 1 year ago
@Inediblehulk How can you even compare a building that was 110 stories tall and weighed 500,000 TONS to a dinky short building that barely had 10 stories like that? dee dee dee
Jimbogf 1 year ago
@Jimbogf Easy. I look at one, then the other and analyze the similarities AND differences. Comparison doesn't equal equation. Obviously, there are huge differences and I don't claim otherwise, or say this video is any sort of proof of anything. But it does have hints in it.
Inediblehulk 1 year ago
@Inediblehulk
Hints? What are you talking about?! Do you have any clue of the topic a bit? Structure engineering and related field? Behavior of different scale, differently composed, various material made constructions? Just to scratch the surface of the topic.
Your comparisons so far indicate only lack of knowledge, you have no idea what you are trying to talk about..
But that's what happen when someone 'analyze' after random online videos. Brave. Dumb, but brave.
racztomi 1 year ago
@racztomi I'm no expert in engineering by a longshot, but I know what I know. And I admit there's far more I don't know than I do. I've seen a lot of things fall down/break/crush other things/etc, and while I don't know the exact formulas and algorithms at work, they always seem to go down the way I expect they should, or at least in a way that seems to make sense after I think about it for nine years. The onus is on someone to convincingly explain the fall to me, not the other way around.
Inediblehulk 1 year ago
@Inediblehulk The topic is too broad to explain to you, people are trained on this for years. If it is really important for you to understand, you should take the courses and learn all the effects, conditions, aspects that affect the behavior of a structure.
The point is actually that there are no exact formulas to describe the behavior of one particular building. The conditions are wildly different, even in case of identical designs there are differences. No way you can build real theories!!
racztomi 1 year ago