Added: 2 years ago
From: haedrianalexander
Views: 58,637
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (362)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • המצאות רוסיה פרשה ב1917

  • which side was italy on i hear they are ally but elsewhere i hear they are centrel whats going on here?

  • @MrJamessell30 they intially were on the central powers but switched sides when the war started

  • @khcooper33 ok I got told by my history teacher today that they were part or the triple alliance but had a secret treaty with France? yeah.

  • ---

  • ----

  • ---

  • ----

  • ----

  • Georgia wasn't ocupated by anybody ! there are many mistakes

  • Hey you're idiot...Albania was neutral in that war -.-

  • We would have won if the U.S.A didnt enter the war..

    Btw, when Russian revolution made, Russians gave some of their territory to Turks by an agreement.

  • Finland declared it's independence in 1917.

  • Almost no Anglo Saxon & its Families & Allies (except forced ally) seems to even try studying by things in the past, yet, still today.

    There have been basical error as a man settled and supported by those whites in 1945 & of course the "Historical empty leader, only made of blood" are still in the states of the daydream or imagination world without having the reality.

    And then, people repeat these videos only for excite.

  • Well done! Excellent quick summary of WW1.

  • Why did sarajevo terrorist assinate the Austrian crown prince?

  • @caccycacman They where not terrorists , they assasinated crown prince becouse austria ilegali taken bosnia to be their teritori ... and by the way this video is full of schit , 1st the war did not begin in belgium , but in serbia ... thats when the first win in war came by alies (serbia) .... (sorry for bad english ...)

  • great work, with good narration, but why did one choose red and purple for colors of opposing sides? makes it far harder to see being 2 colors so similiar.

  • ★THE ROTHSCHILDS ARE THE PROBLEM!★

    They're in charge of the Whole Western Civilization!, All Religions, All Food Fabrications,Goverments(Organi­­zations), The Media(Associations), And all Financial, Mass Murdering Institutions...

    They have caused Disorder, Death and have Financed every War From Both sides since the 1600's and are the ones behind the horrible day of 9/11!

    We must not let ourselves be treated like Taxpaying Deathslaves of the Liberal Bankingsystem!

    ★ ITS TIME FOR REVOLUTION ★

  • Too Much France intervening with Treaty of Versalies Leads to Cranberries Zombie W.W.II, And Clash of Nations W.W. III 2nd Opinion!

  • Armistice means You Need General Amadeus to bomb Geneva conventions than have your Generals Watching from Geneva Conventions Waiting for America Jetsflying overhead to bomb ,not figuring it out reverse engineered after Germany surrendered + Mother Russia died? Dr. Who won W.W. I? Says Rip europe to Tzar's Family 1620-1920! This seems to slow motion to coordinate eveyone jumping into the war too slow! zzzzz. German u boats steal the show! Good to have space stations & space teams!

  • how many time serbs and turk war they was always enemy

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • O and @GorgenGortex, why don't you just, you know, jump of a skyscraper or something, you damn bloody idiot.

    No I'm not a Jew myself, just Dutch.

  • America, always America, if every country would have acted like the Netherlands, by remaining neutral ( which was the best thing a country could do) America would never become the great superpower of the world, but that would have been the U.K. and/or Germany and WWII and the cold war wouldn't have happened.

    So @LaMalia35, Neutral Netherlands! *whoop whoop*

  • What about Kosovo? at least pristina should be to Serbia, that place is like Hastings to Serbia.

  • Zionist Jews made the WW I !!! Open your eyes!

  • Romania wasn't deleted , we have some wins at first but we couldn't stand against Austria&Hungary and Bulgarian army and our ally Russia was nothing ...

    We had the north of the Moldova free. and we reorganized the army there and then  we won :D

  • U.S.A came in kickin' ass and takin' names! *whoop whoop*

  • @LaMalia35 im sorry to tell you this, but err- the USA didn't do much

  • Constantinople WTF ?!

    it´s iSTANBUL !!!

  • THIS IS SO FUCKING STUPID VIDEO!!! YOU GOD DAMN RETARDS DONT YOU KNOW ABOUT BATTLES AT CER, DRINA AND COLUBARA???????? THOSE WERE THE FIRST ALLIES VITORIES MADE BY SERBS!!!!!!!! FUCK YOURE RETARDED AS HELL

  • Serbia done greatest heroic deeds during ww1, and you dont even know that?

    fucking idiots...

  • ht tp :/ /e-sim . org/ lan .18954/

    HELP YOUR COUNTRY TO DOMINATE THE WORLD, BE THE STRONGEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD

  • Maaan,you should have done a WWII video, that would have been really cool, cause you did a very good job with this

  • Central powers and the allies? That's post-wwII bullshit. There were no "allies", they were called the Triple Entente

  • you forgot that at the start of the war italy was on the side of the tripe alliance germany, austro-hungary and italy but switched sides because of promises os more land by the triple enetente britain, france, russia

  • you forgot that at the start of the war italy was on the side of the tripe alliance (germany, austro-hungary and italy) but switched sides because of promises os more land by the triple enetente (britain, france, russia)

  • you forgot that at the start of the war italy was on the side of the tripe alliance (germany, austro-hungary and italy) but switched sides because of promises os more land by the triple enetente (britain, france, russia)

  • without the USA and the British Empire, France were New Germany.

  • @Jackblackblood without the help of Austria, Hungary, Turkey and Bulgaria. You would have never declared war ^ ^

  • @TheJEANFB

    Germany didn't start the ww1!

  • @Nr1DanieL WW1 not, they are your brothers from Austria, is pretending not to be German. By cons is you who had declared war on France

  • wha lol ? 3 Countrys (Germany, Austria and Turkey) against 12 (Allies)

    =Allies are fucking War noobs

  • Wären die Italiener nicht so elende Verräter gewesen , hätten wir sicher gewonnen und unser schönes Kaiserreich würde noch bestehen !

  • Serbia lost 33% population in this war (2milions) and beated austro-hungarians in first battles of war... Nothing about that?

  • They didn't tell that first allied victories in the war were Serbian victories in battles of Cer and Kolubara which were large battles involving large armies, but typical of west to only mention their victories, they also forgot to mention that Seriban army manged to evade capture and retreat to greece from where they counterattacked together with French and when they defeated half million strong Bulgarian army, and then liberated Serbia and created Yugoslavia

  • You don't speak about first victory for the allies made by Serbian defenders? You don't speak of Serbian sacrifice to the allies, 1/3 of Serbians was dead! And 1/2 male Serbians!

    Говна западњачка никад нећете видети колике жртве приносимо за вас!

  • @Lockey007 jebem im mater nikad nas ne spominju, mi zapoceli rat mi ga zavrsili odneli prve pobede i zadnje.

  • @Lockey007 You fucking inbred animals started all this evil. Serbs should be wiped out of the face of the earth and only then will evil stop to exist. I hope albanians kill all of you!!

  • @Lockey007 who the fuck cares, you idiots were responsible for WW1.

  • @l33tnobody1337 No, we just made a couse for it to be started. You should read more about it before posting stupid comments.

    Wikipedia article: ,,...Long-term causes of the war included the imperialistic foreign policies of the great powers of Europe, including the German Empire, the Austro-Hungarian Empire, the Ottoman Empire, the Russian Empire, the British Empire, France, and Italy.''

  • @l33tnobody1337 Actually, if you look more closely, Austria-Hungary was already prepared for a war with Serbia, even before the Sarajevo assassination. They were hesitant in the past to go to war because they had no justified cause for that. But when members of organization "Young Bosnia" killed the Archduke, they rushed in to impose severe conditions on Serbia which no independent state could accept. Serbia accepted all,except 1-2 conditions,so A-H had a "justified" reason to attack.

  • @asdfasqwert Actually, Austria-Hungary saved Serbia from Bulgaria in 1885 when Serbia decided to steal land again from us but was destroyed. When Bulgaria was already in Serbia and tried to save the Bulgarian Pirot city, Austria-Hungary threatened us with war if we don't quit Serbia. Then Austria-Hungary paid for helping Serbia.

  • @Slu4ainika Remember that in 1885 the entire Serb people was against the war.Soldiers were not willing to fight Bulgarians because they saw them as their brothers.But the Serb king Milan wanted to stop the annexation of E.Rumelia fearing that would threaten Serb supremacy in the Balkans.Serb army was besieging Vidin while Bulgarian army captured Pirot and Nis.A-H saved Serbia because Bulgaria was a Russian pawn and Serb king Milan was the protegee of Vienna.

  • @Slu4ainika Austria-Hungary regretted for acting like Serbs are not human.The entire Western world saw Serbs as barbarians, but, later in the war,the West was amazed how they handled the war and occupation.

    Zato, brate na Blgarija,ne e dovolno kazati samo da su vas Srbi razbili 1918, nego i izbacili Blgarija iz ratot :)

  • @asdfasqwert Handled occupation ? You ran in Albania, what a handle, look bro since 1817 Serbia had been stealing lands from other countries. Serbia wanted to united the Slavic people on the Balkans and hopefully it failed. Serbia = Šumadija, every other single territory Serbia has was taken away from other countries. That's why even today you have national problems with territories while others are doing economical things you still fight for 19 century things.

  • @Slu4ainika We ran to Albania because we were defeated by Germany, Austria-Hungary and Bulgaria who had to attack us together because Austria couldn't defeat us alone.Yes, we are still fighting 19. century problems, you're right.Originally, Nis and Pirot should be Bulgarian, but now there are Serbs, they speak Serbian ( bad Serbian, but still Serbian. People from Pirot could be considered talking half Bulgarian, half Serbian. "Ja sam ga utepaja jer sam karate treniraja" :D )

  • @Slu4ainika But,Bulgaria is not innocent too.You shout how MAcedonians are Bulgarians,and yet you treated them as shit during WW1,stole from them and acted like they are occupied,not your brethren.How bad it was says the fact that an ALBANIAN told the Westerners how Serb government in MAcedonia was the best.You should get informed on how Bulgarian komitadjis treated the locals.

    P.S.We're not stealing any land.Hungarians are to blame for settling us in Vojvodina and Krajina,they brought us there

  • @asdfasqwert We threatened Macedonians in WW1 ? Dude, 3/4 of the Bulgarian officers were Macedonians and 1/2 of the Bulgarian soldiers were Macedonians/Macedonian Bulgarians. You fail so much here, so so much. In 1913 your king was in Skopje and he asked a littler girl "What you are?", the girls answered "I'm Bulgarian" and your king slapped here in the face. Macedonian region was a Bulgarian territory since the Middle Ages and you broke one nation into two countries.

  • @Slu4ainika I fail? Please. I have the scanned original report from a Swiss doctor who visited Macedonia during the breaking of Thesalloniki front.In that report he gathered the testemonies of how Bulgarian komitadjis maltreated Macedonians and stole from them. If you want, I can send you the link to the scanned version of the original.

    1/2 of Bulgarian soldiers were MAcedonians?Now, you fail.

  • @Slu4ainika We didn't break your nation in two. Tito did. And he was a Croat ;) :P

  • @asdfasqwert Actually you did it in 1913, ofc they kept their Bulgarian souls until 1944... Then Tito brainwashed them and turned them into zombies. Nowadays they are crying for Bulgarian passports and they are watching with better eyes on us which is a good sign.

  • @Slu4ainika Nope, you're wrong. In 1913 we took what you consider half of your nation. We didn't break it away in a real sense.Tito finished that job.The reason for Serbia taking the Vardar valley was recreation of the medieval Serb empire.Not quite a justified reason, but then Macedonians were anational back then a lot.You had some of them saying they are Serbs, some saying they are Bulgarians and many not knowing or thinking what they are.

  • @Slu4ainika I'd rather see Macedonia within Bulgaria than like this...They erected a monument to Alexander the Great. They have nothing to do with him, he's a Greek -.-"

    Yes, Macedonians belong with Bulgarians, but now they are what they are...nor Serbs, nor Bulgarians, but Macedonians :S

  • @asdfasqwert They're crazy, the Yugoslav propaganda destroyed them... They're already in big isolation with all of its neighbors.

  • @Slu4ainika It would have been the best if Serbia agreed to split MAcedonia with Bulgaria. Then Bulgaria wouldn't have been mad at us and betrayed us in 1913 and 1915 -.-"

    Yes, we see those years as Bulgarian betrayals of pan-Slavism and brotherhood.

  • @asdfasqwert Actually 1913 was a big fail between all our allies. We attacked but at the same time you decided under the table behind Bulgarian's back to split Macedonia with Greece even though your politicians knew that this is Bulgarian population. And 1915 was just a normal thing after 1913. Just like it was normal for France to start WWI after the 1870 war.

  • @Slu4ainika I don't know about those plans for splitting Macedonia with Greece.All I know is that Bulgaria was not satisfied with the results because it bore the greatest part of battles, and gained less land than anyone.And the main problem was Serbia taking over Vardar valley.I think there were propositions for splitting Macedonia with Bulgaria, with Serbia controlling land from Skoplje all the way to Ohrid, and Bulgaria taking the rest.It would have been a fair trade.

  • @Slu4ainika Serbia=Serbs. Where Serbs live,there is Serbia, no matter what the current borders are.

    And, for the end, I must ask you, do you know ho Serbs treated Bulgarian prisoners?

    Serb soldiers gave half of their miserable food rations to Bulgarians and called them:"Brothers". Imagine that! You fight a nation who is killing, looting and stealing from you, and yous till call them brothers for the sake of Slavism.And that is why we see you, Bulgarians, as backstabbers.

  • @Lockey007 Actually it was 1/4

    Serbia before the war had 4.4 million people, and it lost 1.1 million in total during the war

  • But you must say, Germany and Austria was rly hard to defeat, i mean fighting in east and west and without america they could won...maybe!

  • A lot of incorrect data here; Romania was for instance not part of the Entente until 1916.

  • "Give me the Serbian army and I will win this war."

    Wilhem II last german kaiser

  • @enfalse Did he actually say that?If he did then he is AWESOME!

  • @enfalse

    Ne seri...

  • @Swertzer

    serem ti po faci

  • @enfalse

    Naravno,retarde glupi...

    Ali samo ti i takvi kao sto si ti mogu da veruju u ta sranja,koja nemaju veze sa istinom...

  • @Swertzer

    Napuši mi se kurca ograničeni debilu

    Ne bih to rekao da sam pročitao sa jednog nebitnog izvora već iz više knjiga i WIKIPEDIE.

    Pajseru.

    I odjebi smaraš.

  • @enfalse

    Da pogodim,to je rekao i hitler i sadam,pa i gadafi? :)

    Mama ti pajser...Mozda jesam ogranicen ali ti si pglu ko tri kurca..."vise knjiga" phahahahaha

    Tvoja mama me smorila...

  • @Swertzer

    Umobolni majmune rekao sam ti odjebeš od mene.Jesi li toliko glup da to shvatiš?

    Pajseru.

    Nemam nameru da ti se pravdam više.

  • @enfalse The Serbian army has no single win against a Bulgarian soldier in the history :) 1885, 1913, 1919, 1941 - you always run.

  • @Slu4ainika Isn't that a bit arrogant to say?What about Velbuzd battle, Second Balkan war, 1918 - retreat after the solun front, serbian army and allies made Bulgaria to capitulate.I'm not sure about WW2 so i;m not going to say anything but i am sure that your statement is pure trolling.

  • @enfalse Second Balkan War was Romania, Turkey, Greece, Montenegro and Serbia against Bulgaria... What do you expect ? :) But lets not spam. I hate to spam about history, I gave my opinion, you gave yours.

  • @Slu4ainika Actually, it does. In 1913, Bulgarian surprise attack was stopped by the Serb Army. It was only later that Bulgaria surrendered instantly because 5 countries attacked them :P

  • Sorry. Somme. There were no serbs at Somme.

  • GREATNESS TO AUSTRIA-HUNGARY AND GERMANY!

  • 0:15 terrorist wtf????Every country after ww1 said that he was freedom fighter not some terrorist...who is this retard who said this?

  • And where there is shown in Warsaw where he is shown here of the Republic of Polish independence, this movie is definitely poorly made

  • Россия 12 000 000 !!! слава героям которые не покорились германии!!!

  • в пизду вас... спорить с вами... как можно спорить с человеком который не знает истории!

  • @egor106 what i was getting at was germany had nothing to do with the fact that communism spread through the russian revolution other than prussia fathered karl marx who was dead way before the revolution. you can not blame germany for the rise of marxism-leninism. the only thing germany did was win the war, which brought your country to the tipping point. . your comment in translation seems like incoherent gibberish but thats just translation i think i saw what you were trying to say

  • @cheeseshoes ты бред несёшь!!! какой нах марксизм ленинизм??? если бы не революция 1918 года мы бы сами без этих "союзников" германию одолели!!! союзники- пидоры всегда сиськи мяли и не решаличь помочь нам русским во всех воинах в которых мы участвовали!!!

  • @egor106 so you come back around to say its the allies that caused communism instead of germany? when you clearly said it was germanys fault 2 weeks ago. make up you mind on what you think happened and whom you are mad at then come back and talk to me.

  • nein ! put bluntly, the German nation would not exist, without the Napoleonic wars (consolidation of german city states, hence centralization), leading to Bismark, = which could not have occured without the french revolution, which could not have occurred, without Louie the 14th, spending generations of money, in solidifying Frances defences by making hundreds of forts throughout the border.. or and his grandson, sending ships and troops (cost), to the US against Britain. gotta love history

  • @teddythebenny well if you want to go that far we might as well go all the way back to the end of rome and up through the dark ages when the pope leo ii announces charlemagne emperor because that it the true start of government in the germanic territories

  • u gotta love history XD .. though the passage of time is linear.. i sincerely believe, we have been repeating history, be it at least in the form of human catharsis & hubris. The idea, that humanity can live, side by side, at peace, with a strong conviction of posterity, in the eyes of prosperity.. is as dead, as rome is today.. in its ruins, & all those who came after it.. have all but failed to achieve it.. albeit, a war to end all wars.. life is such a disillusionment beyond the ideals of one

  • its all the illusion of life. no one wants to die yet we all want others out of our way, the idea of individualism is in itself a figment of imagination. we all want the same things we just see different ways of achieving it. people don't learn and never will. because we are all arrogant and all ignorant to ourselves and what others have, are, and will do, that is why society is a danger. the sooner we accept our mortality and all our mindsets are one is when we shall kill each other in dignity.

  • @cheeseshoes a wonderful theological construct, repeated once more, .. my english teacher told me always to look outside the window, not through the window, but beyond its frames.. ignorance, is born out of neglect, and that is born through societies will over the individual whim.. allowing fear to grow.. most people dont realize.. if u just smile, people will not shy away. true, arrogance and ignorance exist.. but personally, we are doomed creatures... that can smile at deaths door, warmly..

  • @teddythebenny it is funny my english teacher told me the same years ago but he was a hippie. i on the other hand got a much different message. fear. people gather into society to escape death out of fear but then when their society forms lust they willingly kill for possession . and through our ignorance of individualism we cannot fathom others doing the same to us. we smile at our own arrogant victory not deaths door. true they are the same but it is ignorance that lets us believe differently

  • @cheeseshoes ..put simply; lack of understanding = fear = anger = hatred = .. the continuing cycle of hatred.. the continuing cycle of death and destruction. If we educate our children, the wars of the past, the suffering of the individual, and not merely of those who are stamped into history, even then, the world will always continue on a path of utter desolation. Y such pessimism? .. for every yr, of the 20th and 21st, people have died from war.. and prosperity, across the world has risen.

  • @teddythebenny why such pessimistic point of view? my kid was killed for oil, for other mans greed and not for his own. prosperity has only diminished since the end of industrialization. no one has a job no one has money and we all die feeling unaccomplished and incomplete.

  • yet it is that very thought, that drives, the very essence of humanity.. they say there are two types of individuals, one who is clouded by religion, who lacks the individual wisdom of sentinel existence, yet lives a life, filled with values, in which time, gives a semblance of existence, of meaning, or worth... the other, is a individual, who denies, the existence of the divine, rational, willed, made to understand.. the equity of reason.. at the loss of hapless happiness. but thats just me.

  • @teddythebenny yes that would have been the case but when societies grow evolve and incorporate new views you get a third, fourth and fifth person. the asshole the confused and the rejected. when you start to talk about religion which is inevitable, you get people who persecute, claim, or deny. the same three principles again. society cannot exist with or without them and that is why society is doomed which inherently makes people doomed. so the question is why do they form societies?

  • ah, but what is a society.. srry, to be nihilistic.. but society, generally in my opinion is formed, be it inherently to judge, give order, to access & to control. the ethics & morals, that so coherently, exist to give a precedent to w/e action is taken, from the point of view of main street, or the individual down the road, is merely, a psycho-socio commodity, attuned & forsaken, when it becomes unnecessary due to a event. doomed we may be, yet we still strive, to find, a small measure of peace

  • @teddythebenny exactly. that is what i have meant when i say society. it is the order that should be questioned the common ideals are what get us in more trouble than necessary. when people suffer and find a small amount of peace they think they win, just like in poker the lose 1000 and gain 100 they feel they are in the lead but they are really down 900. dont settle for suffering to bring small amounts of peace it should be the other way around. more peace should bring little suffering.

  • @cheeseshoes fine ideals, sir.. but rememeber Richard Nixon? on his epitaph, it states; the greatest title history can bestow to an individual, is that of a peacemaker.. alas, for him, he prolonged the war, the suffering of individuals, countless and many.. for the sake of his own, sensibilities and ideals. And u know very well, how capitalism works.. and no other system works.. because simply, we are individuals.. striving always, to go beyond our ideals.. those who fail, are forgotten.

  • @teddythebenny and he is the shining example of what wants to keep us in this type of society by lying cheating and casting a vail on the goings on. richard nixion the president was an individual but the man wasnt, he was just the same as everyone else. capitalism doesnt work for shit(pardon me) it will only work if people cheat or steal. in order for one to be rich others have to be poor. but the rich want to stay rich and the poor want to be. the only thing remotely individual is how to get it

  • @teddythebenny socialistic democracy is the best form of government and economic choice if you think about it. seeing we all want the same things. equality, security and lack of fear, and to feel important. well socialism offers equality, the society offers security and lack of fear though just a state of mind as it the rest of our lives, and democracy gives us the importance of what we say counts. so that is truly what we all want but politics isn't so easy because...

  • @cheeseshoes u endorsement of a such a system, is but a dream, a good one, but .. well to transform todays society, we need a massive change in the financial system, whereby the standards of fictitious money is reduced to a 1/1 ratio. the introduction of technology, without bounds.. i.e recycling of all previous systems = efficiency in resource, the utilization of renewable energy, hence, limitless energy = Green energy exploration. We have the solutions of ending world hunger, poverty.. today.

  • @teddythebenny first of all i would like to correct you i said socialism not communism. there is a difference however, i do not support neither any form of marxism nor capitalism i too have given up on what i could have had. but i still argue that society is unnecessary granted we wouldnt be talking to each other or know what we are taking about without which is why we have in the first place. i would love to get up and leave but where can i go society is everywhere and i still got to pay taxes.

  • ahh, my apologies, i only meant communism, on the facet socialism.. however much it may not seem, too apparent, though the word, similar should not be used within its contextual history. I got up & left, my native land, and went and found a new place in my mothers native land.. to discern, & understand, an, entirely different system of governance, hence society.... Neither one of us, i doubt, wants a world like 1984, or the visions of Huxleys brave new world.. one merely needs smile, afterall.

  • @cheeseshoes unlike previous time periods, were society was bound by political, financial, demographic and religious constraints, thanks to technology, we have freed ourselves, from the sectarian bounds. The political landscape today, is far too old fashioned.. partisanship = win. which is utterly pointless.. hapless humans are, in the endeavor to find, a solution.. all of the worlds problems can be solved.. today, due to technology, alas, we can also end it. Ive already given up on this world.

  • @teddythebenny we have left out a very important factor. the dark side of man. some call it sin, hatred, greed, evil... but what it is, is humanity. humans have the sick curiosity and longing to see others in pain and to feel superior to one another everyone wants it some way or another and that is where capitalism comes in. capitalism feeds the darkness of humanity like twigs in a fire. so which is better everyone happy or the evil that is the result of capitalism. i posted 3 make sure you read

  • @cheeseshoes albeit, i must apologize to the viewers of this video, for clogging up the comments box. However, with regards to the political system endorsed.. My history teacher told me, that communism, only works in a country which already has wealth, i.e the US.. well that failed XD.. In Japan, we still have the communist party.. plz note, though Pythagoras is neat for maths, he was a social activist, creating his own commune, and then it been destroyed.. hence control over..society is needed

  • 4th post. im sorry if its a bit confusing. The essence of humanity, in terms of understanding, has always been to categorize. a societies information, hence power is through ideological categorization of numerous variables that make up a society.. = good & bad. We are taught as children, that boys like soldiers, girls like maids.. black is evil, light is good. Personally, no one is born evil, or good.. only society dictates that path.. the brightest lighthouse, is the same as the smallest candle

  • @teddythebenny 2nd. i read your comments very well. i hope you can read mine just as well, it seems we have the same way of thinking. i can assume what you will say when you leave off most people get pissed at me when i expect the to do so. it is just we differ on a few things that cannot be explained in 500 characters please PM me so that we can continue our discussion i am really enjoying it.

  • @cheeseshoes войну мы русские проиграли из-за революции, разногласия политиков в том плане что большевики говорили что война это не наша а царя а на европейской части 60 процентов населения россии были за свержения монарха николая 2-ого... я тебе могу привести очень много примеров ,на эту тему, почему был сорван триумф русского народа и посоветую посмотреть тебе фильм "Адмирал" на английском языке... или на другом языке, я не знаю откуда ты...

  • Why does not anyone mention Battle of Cer(first allied victory) and Battle of Kolubara, and Drina? In those 3 battles we kicked Austrians ass! Serbia suffered about in those three battles 140,000 losses, while Austria-Hungary at least 250,000 losses.

  • @N92Milan because it was the type of warfare its a shame that rebellions are considered battles to some people

  • @cheeseshoes Yeah, especially the 1775–1783 rebellion. It is a shame that the Brits lost.

  • @N92Milan its not considered a battle unless you win. up until the the first american revolution was over the brits considered it a quarrel . in my last comment i put are but i meant aren't

  • fake

  • @wotansteel where is iron triangle never conquer by germans?

  • Российская империя выйграла если бы не этот ,сраный, казер со своей ,сраный, германией проплатили ,сраному, ленину эту сранную, революцию!!!

    Так что еслибы мы выйграли 1 мировую мы бы были самой сильной страной в мире небыло бы гитлера небыло бы ссср и мы бы небыли в таком сраном говне как сейчас находиться Российская Федерация! Такчто загроничные друзья бойтесь нас россию еслибы не дураки в россии мы бы вас всех на коленни поставили ,весь мир!!!

  • @egor106 Your country was on the brink of war way before ww1. the way you country treated the serfs was bound to end up in revolution. the serfs had nothing to begin with then war breaks out everything goes to the war effort and the serfs are not only forced to fight but they starve and when the war starts to look bad. everyone thinks its in vain. so naturally revolution happens. Russia was medaling with greater powers but had the aditude it was the best that was stupid and dangerous. your fault

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • i dont think germany had the fault,after all serbia killed that guy first

  • @magikflow956 No they werent. That war was completely pointless. It was all just flexing muscle. But lets look at what other wars the war to end all wars caused. WW1,WW2, Russian civil, Cold war(korea,vietnam,soviet-afgha­n, bay of pigs, iraq1) Several smaller conflicts in the Balkans, Several other small brief and bloody revolutions, majority of the wars in africa, Asian revolutions, Iraq2, and american-afgan current. And it wont stop there. That ignorant fool Gavrilo Princip killed billions.

  • @cheeseshoes milion, bilion... how much is brazilian? gavrilo princip killed "only" 2 people... then austrians and hungarians sent czechs and slovaks to kill serbs in front lines... to get rid of panslavs... (majority of these deserted) 50% of male population of serbia died in this war, and they didn't surrender... and believe in that Russian revolution was indeed a tragedy for the nation as bolsheviks were responsible for much more suffering than tsardom ever had been... but mb u know better...

  • @tibinko Like I said chain reactions of one assassination. More than likely the triple alliance and triple entente would have broken apart soon if war hadn't broken out first. So his rush to assassinate Franz Ferdinand when everything else went to utter shit in the plan was stupid. if they had waited a few months it would have been just austria hungary they would be dealing with, still bad for serbia but a less volatile situation for other countries at the present and future.

  • @tibinko As for the russian revolution it was the case of poking the monkey slinging shit. People by nature are stupid and when you restrict education it gets worse. these uneducated people saw czardom as the root of all their problems and only sought to topple and get rid of the czar but they didnt think about who was leading the revolution or what could go wrong or even what to do when its over. It was czardom that sparked and fueled this revolution not germany, idk why ur mad im right in this

  • Thanks i really liked this, short and to the point

  • why didnt russia fight the germans and the bosheviks at the same time?

  • @screwriod Russian king was german by blood. Lenin (boshevik leader) was a german spy. No chance.

  • one word for you Britian!!

  • Romania joined the war after the Russian succes hahahaha they joined to get back their land not for any succes of Russia.And they failed because they didnt get the weapons and military help from Russia Who was promised to Romania for joining the war.

  • World War I was entirely cause but unstoppable Prussian appetite for more power

  • Long live the central powers and the Axle. Long live Bulgaria

  • Big Hungary 4ever !1one

  • @0martiHUN

    I am with you but it is large not big, IE Large Hungary.

  • @0martiHUN

    Of course. Magyars always respected. Especially those magyars who survived the russian prison camps. God bless Hungary is all I can say and wish you the best.

  • world war 1 and 2 were the only wars were Albania and Serbia were friends and helped each other, rofl

  • i want austria - hungary back than we are bigger :D

  • Big Hungary ! 4ever !!!

  • @harckocsi1988 yeah you say it ;D

  • Russia was the first to mobilize and also the first to be defeated by the German forces. After the stalemate in the West, with the Germans deep in French territory, the Germans were swindled into thinking they would get a just peace if they agreed to stop fighting. Instead they got robbed of everything they had. An event which led directly to WW2.

  • Amazing how the central powers put up such a fight against so many countries.

  • @stayeducated1 They're kind of total badasses. Right or wrong, they were pretty ballin'.

  • 2 000 000 Serbs died in WW1 !

  • @chaosknight95 Which is half of population! Thats much more disturbing...