It seems that "Deface"s casting cost is a bit low. It costs usually 3 or 4 just to destory a land, idk though. The second one is great though, and I agree with xepher99, "may" is must.
Thanks for the comment. Generally when a spell has multiple colors in it's cost it becomes harder to cast, so multicolored spells that have the same converted mana cost as a mono colored spell sometimes come with a bonus effect. (Compare Lightening Helix to Incinerate) As far as the "may" and "if" being added to Vaporize, I agree I messed up there.
I love Vaporize. Just a suggestion, though. In the text, you might want to put, "If you paid so and so to play Vaporize, then you 'may' destroy target whatever. The spell would be harder to pull off if the opponent didn't have, say, an artifact on the field, and you had to destroy an artifact.
if you want to make mtg cards check my videos until you find the video "Create your MTG card" it's a program that allows you to make mtg cards EASILY
SwordSkill2 2 years ago
Your cards are awesome. Seriously.
zeldafan99999 2 years ago
Vaporize is a little broken, destroying a land and creature for 4 mana. It is a good idea though.
go8smosh 3 years ago
the other one is arguably more broken because it fits into any type of deck and it is too good for its cost.
If it were like BBB it would be nice but it should say
Destroy target land. If the land is non basic you may pay 1 life to draw a card.
LennoxLewis86 2 years ago
Nice! I would love to see these cards put into print by wotc!
Jukren54 3 years ago
It seems that "Deface"s casting cost is a bit low. It costs usually 3 or 4 just to destory a land, idk though. The second one is great though, and I agree with xepher99, "may" is must.
habel123098 3 years ago
Thanks for the comment. Generally when a spell has multiple colors in it's cost it becomes harder to cast, so multicolored spells that have the same converted mana cost as a mono colored spell sometimes come with a bonus effect. (Compare Lightening Helix to Incinerate) As far as the "may" and "if" being added to Vaporize, I agree I messed up there.
jedi1josh 3 years ago
I suppose your right, didn't look at it that way.
habel123098 3 years ago
I love Vaporize. Just a suggestion, though. In the text, you might want to put, "If you paid so and so to play Vaporize, then you 'may' destroy target whatever. The spell would be harder to pull off if the opponent didn't have, say, an artifact on the field, and you had to destroy an artifact.
xepher99 3 years ago
Your right, I should've added the word "May".
jedi1josh 3 years ago