Obama plans to escalate Afghan War & start war in Pakistan

[nowellian]

Obama is just doing what he campaigned on back in 2008.

HaHa, i voted for Nader.

[Orbit915]

Im joining the army this month, soon i will see what's going on first hand

[jaggarai]

Americans attacked iraq because they thought irqa has some mass destructions weapons but they had nothing

On the other side america is the only country to use nuclear weapons on any country.

So where america stands w.r.t the peace of the world.

I america need oil it should buy not occupy

[Creatorisintherain]

I pray that there is an alternative fuel found and that "they" finally SEE..!

[abarzilai664]

I think if a new front should open up along the Afghan-Pak border it would most likely resemble the 2006 Lebanon War.

[govpol91]

Obama love foes so he is increasing em....

[actionsfurysroar]

By INVADING Pakistan in order to kill 1 Osama Bin Laden, this fool OBAMA will create 100000 Osama Bin Laden in Pakistan and all around the Muslim world.

[Congo4life]

there is only 2 parties to vote for every 4 years now and noone of the U.S. citizens no thrid parties... Republican or Demoract is gonna have almost no effect only a placebo effect

[nowellian]

As many as 1 million civilians killed in Iraq, untold thousands imprisoned and tortured. All in the name of fighting the war on terrorism.

Obama wants to do the same to Afghanistan??

No thanks!!! I WILL vote for Nader!!!

[AllySmells001]

Its such a nuanced disagreement between Nader and Obama in my opinion--provincial policing, but with Obama, backed with military when necessary, to squash Al-Quaeda(as he is proposing IS necessary). Hmm. Nader disagrees? Am I wrong about Nader's view? Correct me without calling me a "puppet," I'm rather tired of that.

[0613162k]

Ralph NAder 2008

End the war in Iraq AND Afghanistan

No war in Pakistan or Iran

No military aid to Israel and Georgia, be neutral in Israel/ Palestine, russia/Georgia conflict

Cutting excessive military expansion already >50% of gov. spending when US in debt

Vote Nader 08. The real anti war candidate.

[jdoser]

I agree.. Since Ron Paul didnt get the Rep nominie I am 100% behind Nader. He is probably one of the most moral men out there and has devoted his entire life for the common good!

[mikerotethis]

nice 3 bad guys out of 25 people. now i know this war is worth it!!!!!!!!!

[Modeltrainguy]

Uh Oh! Voting FOR Obama will get us in DEEPER trouble!

[NatureLegalized]

Go 3rd Parties!!!

GO NADER!

2008

[ArcticSlicer]

Let's provoke war with the Pakistani military that possess nuclear weapons; great plan. Not!

[jalvarezvUtube]

Always good to watch or listen to Democracy Now!

[GLOBALRESISTANCE]

Lieberman, a cover and a cog in the global police state hierarchy, has already signalled that the fascists in Washington and Tel Aviv have made the decision that Palin and McCain will be put in the White House this upcoming fraudulent "election".

It was a close call, but the global fascists decided that it was safer to hide behind Palin's skirt, rather than take a chance on hiding behind Obama's dark skin.

[ObamaTheBlackJFK]

Take your pick. Who has better judgment? The neo-conservative and imperialistic ticket of McCain/Palin or the diplomatic ticket of Obama/Biden?

[yrrmom]

The question as you put it can't fairly be answered, because it's based on an erroneous distinction. In fact, BOTH parties support imperialism (as the vid proves). Why else would both parties unquestioningly support remaining in Afghanistan (which the US got into thru agression, the highest international crime), escalating that "war", and reserving the "right" to make unilateral strikes within yet another sovereign nation: Pakistan? Doesn't sound too diplomatic to me.

[ObamaTheBlackJFK]

The fact still remains and your choice will happen in 49 days. You can vote Obama, McCain, or waste your vote on a 3rd party candidate, or not at all. It's up to you. You can play the devil's advocate as much as you want, but the clear choice for most anti-war voters is Obama/Biden. You know it as well as I do.

[yrrmom]

Your suggested strategy is counterproductive: Why would ANTI-war voters want any PRO-war candidate, like Obama or McCain? I don't suggest wasting votes. I suggest not wasting time with the candidates at all: Start spending time & energy to create the conditions that would allow voters to choose between war & peace. That can't be done by voting. If you're too lazy to do more than just passively vote, fine. Just don't pretend you're helping an anti-war agenda. You're hurting it.

[ObamaTheBlackJFK]

OK, then are you in favor of eliminating both candidates? One will win, face it. I loved Ron Paul as an antiwar candidate and would have voted republican if he were the nominee, but he isn't a real choice any longer. You can stay home on election day and protest. That's up to you. Lazy? Give me a break.

[yrrmom]

You clearly either don't know or don't care that we don't live in a democracy in the US. Sure, we have a chance to vote (for one of two super-wealthy, corporate-backed, pro-business candidates). But take care not to think naively that your voice is being heard when you cast your precious vote. When you passively accept the current form of "democracy", cast your vote, & go home, you are supporting an un-democratic form of rulership with only the outward appearance of real voter participation.

[NatureLegalized]

Answer: NIETHER

No, really take your pick and quit listening to the anal flutter altogether, stop now before your life and our world gets taken further down the path of destruction. The destruction will happen faster than your worst nightmare.

VOTE NADER!

[mikerotethis]

yeah man, Nader/Gonzalez is the diplomatic ticket. he's one of the candidates that won't use the troops. he's on 45 state ballots so you'll probably see him when you vote.

[seasonsandamuse]

Obama supports Afghan and Pakistan war, a well as a missile strike on Iran. This is UNACCEPTABLE.