Unboîtier d'entrée de gamme mais avec un excellent objectif produira de meilleurs clichés qu'un boîtier expert équipé d'un objectif de mauvaise qualité ! Voilà ce qu'il faut se dire.
why is this guy saying that live view is an advantage to the 40D when the 450D has it also? he is too heavy handed with the cameras, that annoys me as it shows he doesn't give a flying f**k
1) The 450D isn't a high end consumer model. It's a basic DSLR. The 40D is the high end consumer model, or the "Prosumer" model.
2) The 450D uses DIGIC III, not DIGIC II. The 400D uses DIGIC II. The 40D uses DIGIC III and the 50D Uses DIGIC4.
3) MP Resolution doesn't tell you shit about image quality, it only tells you the size of the image. If anyone tries to tell you otherwise, they're lying. The image sensor determines IQ along with the 'glass' (lens) it is looking thorugh.
i wish people would realize that a straight megapixel comparison is useless, as you can tell by the better IQ of the 40D. they have 8mp camera phones now and they still look like shit.
Does this guy normally review refrigerators and televisions?
Did he actually say that the biggest change in the 450D is the fact that it takes SD cards? Really, that's the most important feature of the 450D? Wow.
PS Tell your cameraman to stand still. This video induces vertigo. God damn, that's annoying.
i have the canon 450d and its a brilliant camera , i have cs3 photoshoot so you can tweak the photos to make any ajustments and with a better lens than the standard one will give same photo as any other expesive camera
even the best photographers will use photoshoot to ajust the photos and they use 5k cameras
so a good lens and photoshoot will shoot amazing photos without spending 5k
450d is a great camera cos its light easy to carry around where the nikon was heavy
This review is very good I think .... The reviewer does come up with a very solid argument , in which you can decide .Ok so few mistakes , but generally its a great review , and the result is excellent
this is a fucking joke, how can you compare these two models accurately with two different lenses. who ever made this, please learn the basic rules for scientific comparisons.
What the hell is this guy talking about!?!?! Digic II?? Towards the end he confuses the 40D with the 450, this guy doesn't need to be doing reviews! You can't review the 40D with the 450, it's like comparing a ferrari with a honda civic! for the money the 450 is fantastic, if you can afford it and you know what you're doing get the 40D! awful review
Funny, I just ordered a 450D body only. I almost have to hand it to you for blagging all this gear for review... But anyone who doesn't see the glaring issues and errors with this review shouldn't even be considering a 40D.
"There's enough tech, there's enough spec to keep you going for a long time"
This explains a lot - his review is not about photography, it's about justifying spending outrageously more money than your peers.
Someone set on image quality could buy a 450D body and put the large savings toward better glass. For prosumers who need durability, better viewfinder, faster burst speeds, quicker top shutter speed, better autofocus and higher sensitivity spending the money on the better body is worth it
You seem to know what your talking about. So for me first Dslr would the 40D be too much of a jump? should i go for the 450D? Dont wana get 450D and then have to up grade to the 40D in a years time, hence maybe i should just bite the bullet and get the 40D and be done with it? any advise???? confused!
Anyone who says that the image quality from the 40D is "much better" than the 450D should be ignored. This is ridiculous. I can't believe Canon gave these people review models considering the misinformation they are spreading.
5 grand for a lens,i dont see any review that shows its low light imaging with the standard lens at high iso on long exposures,to test any electronics, always use worse case scenario.low light , long exposure,high ISO ,then look for noise,even a cheap camera will give reasonable results with good light & glass.
but, your missing one thing. He had an 18-55 on the 450 D and a 50-200mm? or something similar on the 40D. How silly, he should have put the same lens on each camera because of course the picture wuality will be different with a different lens. This review is wrong!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Thanks for the review because I am deciding between these 2 cameras. I can't believe all the negative comments, Digic II, live view...
At least he made a video and attempted to compare the two. The image comparisons may not have been the most objective/scientific but were still useful. Thanks again!
kurwa co za osiol po kiemu on pierdoli??
pyrzequgel 1 year ago
Ce type de test n'a aucun intérêt !
Unboîtier d'entrée de gamme mais avec un excellent objectif produira de meilleurs clichés qu'un boîtier expert équipé d'un objectif de mauvaise qualité ! Voilà ce qu'il faut se dire.
lifebloger 1 year ago
why is this guy saying that live view is an advantage to the 40D when the 450D has it also? he is too heavy handed with the cameras, that annoys me as it shows he doesn't give a flying f**k
itindall 2 years ago
Canon n Nikon are both great manufacturers ...
and a cam does not take pics..you do..
grow up kiddo !!!!
urbancolumbus 2 years ago
Comment removed
urbancolumbus 2 years ago
This guy's a fucking moron. Doesn't know a damn thing about cameras, photography or much else, it seems. Just a Canon fanboy and an arrogant prick.
diesel828 2 years ago
What a jackass.
ingraman 2 years ago
1) The 450D isn't a high end consumer model. It's a basic DSLR. The 40D is the high end consumer model, or the "Prosumer" model.
2) The 450D uses DIGIC III, not DIGIC II. The 400D uses DIGIC II. The 40D uses DIGIC III and the 50D Uses DIGIC4.
3) MP Resolution doesn't tell you shit about image quality, it only tells you the size of the image. If anyone tries to tell you otherwise, they're lying. The image sensor determines IQ along with the 'glass' (lens) it is looking thorugh.
SandsOfTime3 2 years ago 22
I agree with you...you are so right
synechris 2 years ago
what kamera gives the best quality images, if you have the same lens on them both?
lillen300 2 years ago
Image quality is about the same. The
ingraman 2 years ago
This guy doesn't know anything about cameras...
666haloinc666 2 years ago 10
Where is the cheapest place to buy a canon 40D? The cheapest i could find here in Ireland is €999 but we get ripped off with everything here!
040506keri 2 years ago
O.o with that price you could have 50D!! (without 10-200 lens kit)
OnBetamax 2 years ago
Is the 450D (xsi) BETTER than the 400D (xti)? (other than MP or resolution) which has a VERY minimal effect.
IntensePizza 2 years ago
Yup. Better processor/features. If you have a 400d and are looking to upgrade, you might wanna look closer. If you have nothing, get the Xsi
fatpaws 2 years ago
It's D!GIC III not 2!!!!
gello6282543 2 years ago 3
i wish people would realize that a straight megapixel comparison is useless, as you can tell by the better IQ of the 40D. they have 8mp camera phones now and they still look like shit.
ddtninja 2 years ago
Does this guy normally review refrigerators and televisions?
Did he actually say that the biggest change in the 450D is the fact that it takes SD cards? Really, that's the most important feature of the 450D? Wow.
PS Tell your cameraman to stand still. This video induces vertigo. God damn, that's annoying.
meiowalot 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
hey guys. they're wrong. both have digic 4 processor
Deathseeker86 2 years ago
Nope sorry. They both have the DIGIC 3 processor. Checkout the canon page for this.
Grafner 2 years ago
photoshop lol sorry hahah
jennadollface 2 years ago
i have the canon 450d and its a brilliant camera , i have cs3 photoshoot so you can tweak the photos to make any ajustments and with a better lens than the standard one will give same photo as any other expesive camera
even the best photographers will use photoshoot to ajust the photos and they use 5k cameras
so a good lens and photoshoot will shoot amazing photos without spending 5k
450d is a great camera cos its light easy to carry around where the nikon was heavy
jennadollface 2 years ago
...photoSHOP...
Shindubob 2 years ago
40D is DIGIC III
elijahdomingo 2 years ago
Both of the cameras have a DIGIC III processor.
Diostillrocks 2 years ago 2
40D has Digic III processor.
zbig83 2 years ago
This review is very good I think .... The reviewer does come up with a very solid argument , in which you can decide .Ok so few mistakes , but generally its a great review , and the result is excellent
jimmyattard 2 years ago
this vid sucks!!!!!!!!
he dosn't know anything about the 450d\xsi
rotaxkarterkid 2 years ago
The reviewer's final comments are solid.
If you're new to a DSLR the 450D is a very good buy. If you already have a canon DSLR 300D/350D then the 40D is a great upgrade.
More megapixels does not equal better. It's largely marking, a simple number that average joe can understand, so that's what they push.
Last point, he did mention that the images compared were taken with the same lens AND that the contrast difference can be easily fixed after the fact.
snigel4321 2 years ago 4
yeaaah what the hell. digic 2? its digic 3
BenSS20 2 years ago
Is the 450d the same as a XSI ?
100Texas 2 years ago
yes, 450D = XSi
kuribo15 2 years ago
wow...this guy has NO idea...wow! what a joke!
dmale69 3 years ago 2
this guy is a total moron..450d does NOT have a 10 mpx sensor...it's 12.2 :|...this review if you can call it that way it's fuckin' stupid:|
Keldrassil 3 years ago
He said the 40D has 10mp.
funpoleece 2 years ago
yeah.. it does.. 40D has 10 mp.. unfourtunately..
z05f3r47u 2 years ago
this review is sucks man.. he's does not know a thing about camera.. stupid.
solviltittus 3 years ago
DIGIC III you mean...
teezackwhy 3 years ago
Amina kodugum millet kamera bulamiyor bu gotveren yerden yere vuruyor hasiktirrrrr
Hayalet08 3 years ago
this is a fucking joke, how can you compare these two models accurately with two different lenses. who ever made this, please learn the basic rules for scientific comparisons.
H8boxx 3 years ago 2
Comment removed
slangoshi 3 years ago
fuck you....you dont even have any videos
atvpolice 3 years ago
i want to get in on the fuck you's
therats2270 2 years ago
Thanks so much, you've been so clear that i bought the 450 d today
radioraoul 3 years ago
a lot more "contrasty"
....riiiiiight
jac31k 3 years ago 3
What the hell is this guy talking about!?!?! Digic II?? Towards the end he confuses the 40D with the 450, this guy doesn't need to be doing reviews! You can't review the 40D with the 450, it's like comparing a ferrari with a honda civic! for the money the 450 is fantastic, if you can afford it and you know what you're doing get the 40D! awful review
Barney9935 3 years ago 7
On 8:56 someone in the editing choosed the wrong clip...
He puts down the 40d, takes up 450d but then there's a clip of 40d instead :O ^^
arcticscummie 3 years ago
also even tho the 450D has more mega pixels the 40D is still better because of the sensor is has!!!!!
davidmcg20 3 years ago
you can set the basic level of contrast, sharpness etc. before shooting, and both camera have DIGIC III proccessors...
Atslabs 3 years ago 5
WOW. this review is FULL OF MISINFORMATION.
if you are in the market for either of these cameras: RUN, don't walk, from this page.
swamp44 3 years ago 3
same elctronics and smaller resolution but takes sharper images. how
thetttttttttttt 3 years ago
what's in the 40D which gives it better image quality??
thetttttttttttt 3 years ago
LLD86 you a yank? Would explain a lot!
MARKI984 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
british are fuckin' retarded
LDD86 3 years ago
450d has digic III not digic II.. try to review again its specs.. Ü
hrnl07 3 years ago 2
He doesn't have a clue.
blondelibrarian777 3 years ago 2
Funny, I just ordered a 450D body only. I almost have to hand it to you for blagging all this gear for review... But anyone who doesn't see the glaring issues and errors with this review shouldn't even be considering a 40D.
Nibbbling 3 years ago
This has to be the worst review of anything I've ever seen. So many errors and stupid comments, hard to understand at times, painful to watch.
1 Star.
audioslave187 3 years ago 6
lol yeah digic II rofl! someone doesnt know all the facts...
Darkrayne29 3 years ago 2
at first I though it was a slip up ... but when he said it for the second time... it just killed his credibility.
xelaeel 3 years ago
omg he sad digic II, im just wondering,
l0ri82 3 years ago
How could you test the camera's with a 400 F/4 that's not even a L lens, and not even as sharp as the 400 5.6 L.
allemyr 3 years ago
"There's enough tech, there's enough spec to keep you going for a long time"
This explains a lot - his review is not about photography, it's about justifying spending outrageously more money than your peers.
Someone set on image quality could buy a 450D body and put the large savings toward better glass. For prosumers who need durability, better viewfinder, faster burst speeds, quicker top shutter speed, better autofocus and higher sensitivity spending the money on the better body is worth it
lneufeld 3 years ago
You seem to know what your talking about. So for me first Dslr would the 40D be too much of a jump? should i go for the 450D? Dont wana get 450D and then have to up grade to the 40D in a years time, hence maybe i should just bite the bullet and get the 40D and be done with it? any advise???? confused!
040506keri 2 years ago
digi 3 mate :)
417329 3 years ago
Anyone who says that the image quality from the 40D is "much better" than the 450D should be ignored. This is ridiculous. I can't believe Canon gave these people review models considering the misinformation they are spreading.
twalker294 3 years ago
they have both digic III procesor
lastkingofpool 3 years ago 2
5 grand for a lens,i dont see any review that shows its low light imaging with the standard lens at high iso on long exposures,to test any electronics, always use worse case scenario.low light , long exposure,high ISO ,then look for noise,even a cheap camera will give reasonable results with good light & glass.
audiofreeq 3 years ago
but, your missing one thing. He had an 18-55 on the 450 D and a 50-200mm? or something similar on the 40D. How silly, he should have put the same lens on each camera because of course the picture wuality will be different with a different lens. This review is wrong!
2jamesl 3 years ago
its 400mm he says it on 4:20 something
xcorpox 3 years ago
Oh and DO lens is not that good quality as L lenses too.
he sounds like 18-55mm is shit but think about the price, do lens is worst choice for the price and what you get.
shinmiura0227 3 years ago
This is video is so bad. Too much mistakes, and you can get lens kit for 40D as well. You should check all the contents before you uploading.
shinmiura0227 3 years ago 4
the 450d is digic 111---just like the 40d
sasktank 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Thanks for the review because I am deciding between these 2 cameras. I can't believe all the negative comments, Digic II, live view...
At least he made a video and attempted to compare the two. The image comparisons may not have been the most objective/scientific but were still useful. Thanks again!
pnmd 3 years ago
LOL! Digic II?.. Are you serious?
osiriz84 3 years ago 2
Canon 40D has Digic III.
janlin21 3 years ago 6
450D too!
jistah 3 years ago 6