(Retired) Oxford Professor of Biology and militant Atheism advocate Richard Dawkins thinks that the idea that "rape is wrong" is morally arbitrary: /watch?v=ISYvY-AvhJQ
& believes that there is 'no such thing as "evil"', has no strict moral objection to infanticide and finds it difficult to argue against (the ideas of) Hitler in moral terms: /watch?v=OO_wywhZBEc
EuropeanWatchman also describes RD's latest work "The Greatest Show On Earth" as "the best argument for eugenics I have ever read..."
Just thought I'd run this video by some of LibertarianRealists subscribers (not LibertarianRealist himself of course because Libertarian"Realist" is apparently too afraid to debate me), who may also subscribe to his apparent view that certain historical events would have probably happened anyway had there been no Jews present at those times: /watch?v=_uNKAmEuSR8 In minute 22: "In the Soviet seizure of power in Russia, the Jewish role was probably critical."
@LibertarianRealist To rid whites of guilt over Nazism is to reveal the truth, as in the historical facts. FDR was a liar who tried to start a war with Hitler 3 years prior to the U.S. entering WWII, and basically orchestrated Pearl Harbor. FDR had one intention, and that was to destroy Western Civilization. It was FDR who was responsible for WWII not Hitler. Hitler's war was with communism. Oh and by the way approximately 100,000 people died at Auschwitz, 80,000 from natural causes.
At a rate of 100 deposits per 24 hour period I reckon it could be mathematically feasible to wipe out roughly 50,000,000 chosen subjects within two years, with a fleet of only 1,000 death ships, give or take a few.
Of course I don't want to have to do it this way and of course I am always hopeful of a peaceful, non-violent, non-forceful solution, but I'm just saying... - IT CAN BE DONE! - Relatively easily in fact...
- And before you say that this couldn't be done for practical reason, I tell you yes it can be! – One possible solution is to simply herd them all into converted oils tankers designed to drop weighted shipping crates into the ocean, at an appointed time and under most whether conditions.
Whenever I make such statements I do not do so as a joke and I am deadly serious. - I apologize if it offends you but in my opinion and under THESE circumstances, THIS MUST HAPPEN. – Indeed there is simply no acceptable excuse for it NOT to happen!
Now, I don't like this, I don't want this, I don't feel comfortable about being exposed to massive outrage and vilification by millions of brainwashed lemmings, but under very specific and unique circumstances, that we may yet avoid (and I hope we do), I think it necessary...
This of course isn't just limited to forced reproduction, but may actually also include state sanctioned mass ethnic genocide as well. – To be enacted under extreme and very specifically awkward circumstances to be sure, yet provided to our people as a possible last resort option nonetheless.
"Blacks through mass immigration, could take over a country in Europe."
Which is precisely why under these very specific and hitherto unknown circumstances, extreme options which would have probably been as distasteful to Adolf Hitler as they so apparently are to yourself, are most necessary. - Not just for the retention of our Civilization, but also for the reenablement of such a retentive capacity in the first instance.
I think LR is confusing Nazism with hatred... the "Neo-Nazi" trash are not true national socialists and would not have been accepted in Germany 1930-45.
National Socialism is a political ideology not based in hate, but preservation and self-determination. Skinheads and white trash are nothing more than enemies to this cause.
@NewTeutonicOrder2 Socialism = central economic planning. Nazi Germany was a fascist totalitarian regime, devoid of individual liberty. You should no that totalitarian government has nothing to do with preservation and self-determination. On the contrary, it results in the DESTRUCTION of the family and the DOWNFALL of civilized society.
@UltraConservative298 Nice, it's cool you've clearly been indoctrinated into propaganda by the winners of the war. But it was not a totalitarian government and they valued individual rights while pressing for equality amongst their people. I know you probably also think they were out for world domination, but reality is they didn't declare war on Britain/France and were just trying to unite what was wrongfully taken from them in the Treaty of Versailles.
Really I thought Poland had their land taken wrongfully by the Prussians, Austrians, and Russians in the late 1800s! Those borders switched all the time and it was not "rightfully theirs". They lost WWI and their government signed the Treaty. Whether it was a wise treaty for the winners to create and for the Germans to sign is a different matter. Nazis agreed to split Poland with the Soviets and made a non aggression pact with them to be able to fight UK/France.
Actually I do not about the war and the treaty. I also know that those borders were not always Germany's or the Holy Roman Empire's. The British blockade of Germany was starving the Germans in WWI, the United States had the largest economy in the world with high moral troops that entered, and the promises by the German government for quick victory against France failed. The German government ordered its delegates to do whatever it took to end the war.
"Murderous Stalinists are now in the role of Academics and Mainstream. They exploit the crimes of Nazis and sugar-coat the horrors of Communism"
This is my summary of your video.
My question is, why instead trying to Sugar-Coat NS and infiltrate the Mainstream... you support further demonization of NS germany and support for "outsiders" (far-right libertarians, which NEVER will win)????
@AnglosphereAlIiance Completely agree. I don't understand how so many white nationalists support Nazi Germany. They even admit that they are national socialists. Socialism = tyranny. How difficult is that to understand? There is no liberty when the government is in control of the economy. I am fairly nationalistic in my views, but I am an economic policy non-interventionist, and completely anti-socialist.
What petty conflicts. We are all on the same side, it's just far-right WN against moderate WN.I have nothing against NEO-nazism, it is basically the "extreme" of moderate white nationalism. I am not a Nazi, but I see no point to cause tension or further fragmentation amongst Nationalists. I believe in Freedom and homogenous nations - What neo-nazi would give up the former for totalitarianism? Do our people not deserve freedom within a homogenous nation? Ultimately we fight for the same thing.
Cont: I don't know much about EuropeanWatchman, but if he advocates rape for White Women (in any form or for any reason), he is human trash. If you had to power to force rape on our women, wouldn't you have the power to create a homogenous nation? Then that wouldnt be "necessary" now would it? Low Birth rates? In an all white nation, a demographic could fluxuate and rebound without being destroyed - We lost 30-50% of our pop during the black plague and lived. Just deport all foreigners!
Sorry guys! LibertarianRealist doesn't want me to express my opinions/views/thoughts/arguments/clarafications/qualifications on his comments areas anymore, so if you want a reponse from me you'll have to mail me directly.
Thanks for all the support btw! - I wasn't expecting it...
On free speech I agree. It's pointless to censor speech, and it's much more effective to show why it is inaccurate, or unworthy of heeding. I wont say that censorship of Mein Kampf, for ex., by the same people that call us both 'nazi' no matter what we say about them, is somehow ok, when the only reason some dont want people reading it is because they know there are many obviously true statements in it. You've never been censored by 'Nazis', or called 'nazi' or even 'racist' by one either!
@DeltaNordicAdvance "In the 1950s, hostility to the record of Nazi racial atrocities tainted attempts to restore Darwinism to the social sciences. From that time on, it became increasingly difficult to suggest that individuals or groups might differ genetically in behavior without being accused of Nazi sympathies." -charlesdarwinresearch
@LibertarianRealist So it was a result of a massive propaganda campaign, then wasn't it? And you are blaming who for the propaganda - the ones pushing it? Why did the public allow what were largely Soviet fabrications to dictate how they thought? Much of those so called 'racial atrocities' didn't even happen, at least not according to the Red Cross that was in Germany at the time, so you are blaming people for lies that were told against them too? You're swatting at phantoms.
If someone is born with a complete lack of sex drive, or complete infertility -- is that only considered a 'disease' if it causes the person a sense of being deprived?
Or, do we use a common understanding that the purpose of an individual life is one that includes reproduction?
Maybe genetically based mental feebleness is not a 'disease' -- so long as the individual is 'happy'.
So even if you want to protray AH as evil, and don't want to talk about 'who was more evil' between he and Stalin, you have to at accept that AH wanted to fight the Soviets, leave the British Empire alone, and the US and GB attacked Germany first. Even Pat Buchanan, who is no friend or supporter of AH, and who didn't refer to any so called 'revisionist' histories , still concluded that and that AH was a much better statesman and strategist than WC. Hate them, fine but admit that much ffs.
You are saying: do nothing to protect the white race because the enemy's reaction is counterproductive to our goal of doing nothing? Nazi action to ensure a healthy, productive, and independent fatherland for whites was a risk. It failed primarily because of the Marxist positions of power in the US allied with marxist jews in Russia. The defunct Nazi party is defamed by propaganda, but its values are essential to white survival. Your mistake is to confound its values with comments from crazies.
You also know that the reason I said "since we're talking about hypotheticals" was because you are saying that "whites would be better off if.." , which is also hypothetical. I'm not even defending totalitarianism either, but on aesthetic grounds and on pure factual grounds, you really are not portraying this accurately. England attacked Germany first of all. Hitler was far more willing to keep peace with England than vise versa. Germans were then starved and murdered by Soviets and Americans.
You have your video flagged by anti whites, and by that I don't mean 'nazis' in any way, shape of form. So you had to change you title so as not to appear pro-white in any way whatsoever. But you still blame 'nazis' for this? And the word 'nazi' is like 'racist' , it's all over the place depending on who is using it and for what reason. I would expect that after you got your vid flagged and you changed the title, you'd at least change the focus of blame, since it's obvious who and what it is.
@DeltaNordicAdvance I'm not going to argue history. I'm arguing that even if I accept your view of it, we'd be better off TODAY not associating favorably with Nazi personalities, symbology, or ideology.
'Nazi' has a specific meaning unlike 'racist'. Liking Nazi art or the autobahn is fine. I like some things about Christianity.
On what grounds should I assume that Nazis are defenders of free speech for anyone but themselves? I've found them to be no more principled than their enemies.
@LibertarianRealist Ok so on that first part you're conceding a victory to the same people that will label you 'nazi' whether or not you actually are or even like them. That is a large part of the problem - you and I are going to be called 'nazis' anyway, just for being biological realists, regardless of our statements of allegiance or association. That's a big reason why I dropped the reluctance to associate or admire much of their symbolism, aesthetic, vision and passion.
Also do not take EuropeanWatchman as a leading voice on Nazism. He seems to not have the minimal idea of what Nazism is.
Finally: I'm not saying Nazism was perfect. It made several wrong things. But for those same things you should condemn the Allied powers that were making similar things too. You have to check the facts, otherwise you will be making just straw man arguments.
Hitler was forced into that war, he did not wanted war. You can check, for example, Liddell Hart, J.F.C. Fuller, and this documentary will show how Germany was forced into that war, and how that war began not by Germany invading Poland but by France, and other countries denying the right of self determination to the German population living in those countries (Alsace and Loraine, Sudetes, Danzig, etc.). The documentary is called "Hitler's War - What the Historians Neglect to Mention"
It doesn't really matter which political system is set upon Europeans when there are no Jews present. We will reach Mars with National Socialism or with Racial Libertarianism - just deport the Jews and destroy modern democracy.
@lastwhiteman205 ello if u abollish womans rites then u act like muslimbs so diss means u r no bettar than them witch means wite womin shud marry blacks and muslimbs cuz they will bee treeted bettar. moore black babys!! yippee
@tracemckenzie2009 I can't even take you seriously. You're in denial of both history and the present.How about apartheid illegitimate stolen state of Israel.. I guess your rationale would describe why they are having such a hard time, lol. As far as Africa, 1/3 of it has been colonized by Arabs, another 1/3 stolen from San by genocidal Bantu in the last 1500 years. Europeans are down on themselves due to modern demoralization brainwashing from childhood, not historical events
Most people are so stupid they don't even know the opposite to eugenics, which is dysgenics.
Eugenics, meaning to genetically upgrade a population through selective breeding.
Dysgenics, meaning to genetically degrade a population through unselective breeding where the inferior have more offspring than the superior, thus leading to degeneration.
so you take the insane prescriptions of some troll EW as a springboard into a far flung hypothetical? If you are going to detract from NS then at least do so against what it really is instead of strawmanning it and blaming it for the propaganda of it's opponents. If you are going to let the opponents of White people in general dictate the discourse so much that anything they point at incessantly immediately gets your stamp of approval for blame, then hand them the towell, like nazis or not.
You're confused. It was, and still is, Judaism that has both psychologically and physically damages white people, if anything Nazism defends and wakes white people up to our enemy, Jewish supremacy
For goodness sake, do some research before spewing out anti-German/pro-Jewish propaganda, you lot are beginning to sound like liberals full of white guilt
@ProlifeVeganAryan The Nazis slaughtered specific ethnic groups (not just Jews), +gays, the mentally ill, disabled & political prisoners in euthanasia progs, shootings & gassings. If they didn't, where did all these people disappear to? A one way flight to the moon? Are the vids all fabricated? Are the documents fabricated? Are the witnesses all liars? For this reason, anyone who now criticizes a societal subgroup is termed as a "Nazi". You have the Nazis to thank for that
To this day, no one has ever been able to substantially prove that millions of people were somehow gassed to death in homicidal gas chambers as a deliberate policy of Adolf Hitler during the Second World War.
All we have in support of this claim are a handful of rather dodgey "eye wittness" reports from Jews, from Soviet torture victims and from people who have been lent on by certain powerful lobby groups.
@EuropeanWatchman The 6 million figure seems questionable even to me. Nevertheless, Jews, gypos, gays, mentally and physically disabled, homeless people and political prisoners disappeared in great big bleeding batches - to the tune of of millions. There are documents, videos, eyewitnesses, and the disappearance to support this. Next you will say that 9/11 and the Japanese tsunami never happened
All I'm going to say is that you're a lazy individual who obviously can't bother 4 hours of your time to question an historical event that never happened which has psychogically scarred white people into self-hate.
I'm a troll because of what excactly? I can produce videos as good, if not better than most other youtubers. You only call me such because I disagree, grow up and quit being so intellectually lazy.
@ProlifeVeganAryan Oh, so the millions that disappeared went into thin air? The eyewitnesses are all liars? The documents are all forged? The videos are all fake? The mass burnings were all fabricated? Its Ok to kill disabled and homeless people? Next you'll be saying that that the Japanese and Thai tsunamis were all fake and that 9/11 was a mirage. Go away, troll
@NAZIBASTARD2 Learn to use the English language to a basic level before criticizing him. No wonder white Europe is going down with illiterate retards like you being born into it
@ProlifeVeganAryan LOL Why would gay pride parades be something anti-white? LOL! You guys are all sick! Just get a life, so maybe you can see though the skin of someone. If gay people adopt they can have have white children, but they are more intelligent, for them is not important to be white or blakc, it's just being!
I think that poster doesn't understand what it means to be Aryan (noble). Rape camps? If the state is going to sanction rape than what is the point in getting rid of niggers? If a specie isn't willing to fuck to save itself than good riddance to it. Our mission is not to be white niggers and start raping everyone, but to wake our people up to the beauty of our kind that they may WANT to proudly be responsible for carrying it into the future.
Nazism as it is meant to be lived from the 30's is most certainly not, anti-white. Nazism as internet people live it now is most certainly anti-white, because it has been perverted to be more anti-Jew and pro-Islam than it is pro-Aryan and pro-community/family.
Black America has a low I.Q because of their women refusing to breed with educated and hard work black American men but choose thugs and jail bait.And people that are always in jail 9 out of 10 tend to have low I.Q in the UK 60% of prisoners have ADHD.Anyway these guys breed with skipping from women to women then the offspring grow up without the family structure and the same cycle continues.Within 2-3 generations you end up with a whole community with low I.Q and high crime.
If "decent" people are willing to question racial egalitarianism and approach the topic with a genuinely open mind, they can do the same with National Socialism. The David Dukes and Jared Taylors play an important part, but ultimately we will need more Matt Hales and Tom Metzgers.
@thespacialone Possibly. I think he's not who he says he is. The Nazi = Evil imagery tells you it's not to be taken seriously. Maybe it's some sort of attempt at reverse programming, maybe it's trollery, maybe it's kikery. To whom is the Swastika evil? Only the people who seek to destroy Arya.
Totalitarianism is a problem, Nazi aesthetics are not bad at all, and did a lot to lift a suffering German people out of their Wiemar hell. So the US and UK decided to attack them and save the communists, how great that's been for us all! I would agree if you attacked totalitarianism and dictatorial governments , but seriously , the West chose communism over Naziism, and has destroyed itself in doing so. History is what it is. The sickness afflicting Europe has been commie-kosher, not "Nazi".
The gay issue is a diversion. There are reproductive problems with it, aesthetic problems , but it's the feminization and marginalization per se, of White men , that is the biggest problem. Additionally, media efforts to subconsciously program white women to like black men and reject white men is a huge problem. How much that has lead to homosexuality I can't say , but I'm sure it's got a lot to do with the roles and aesthetics of gays, which are a feminizing problem.
6:40 I don't regard homosexuality as a disease, but what you are talking about is a pathogen, homosexuality is not a PATHOGEN. a disease is an abnormality that impairs the function of the organism, regardless of cause. incidently your arguement would entail that Cystic Fibrosis was not a disease. To answer the question "Is homosexuality a disease?" we must ask. Do homosexuals find their condition debilitating?
@Aletheophile My understanding is that many physical and psychological ailments, higher suicides, reduced life expectancy etc. accompany homosexual activity.
Does this make it a disease? Why not simply a dysfunction (in that such predilections needn't be acted upon)?
Homosexuality is the end of the genetic line, genes committing suicide. It would make sense for their kin support their self-value by encouraging ways they might "live on" through some creative non-biological legacy.
The fear of naziism is a joke. It's not realistic to say that cult. marxists have ascended because of nazis. That's like blacks saying that they are so poorly behaved because of all the "oppression they feel". The fear is a problem, but it's the fear of a phantom, not a real thing, therefore it's fallacious, media driven, and irrelevant to reality.
watch?v=HZWlZ9-QHA4&feature=channel_video_title
as much as I hated to agree with this at one time, it doesn't bother me that I agree with it now.
Hitler fought for nobility, he fought for Arya; and only through nobility, honor, vigilance, purpose, conscience, devotion, elitism, excellence, beauty, warrior spirit, and the image of god; the "white" race will not perish.
I disagree with this video. Nazism has much more than racial hygiene, it has a strong moral compass. Your never gonna get anywhere with this non-sense about whiteness. During Nazi Germnay the world got mnay important and historic innovations such as motorways, psychology, medicine, medical knowledge, therapy, and much more. About 200 years ago under christianity, the white european people were killing eachother and living in housed mad of hay and wood.
There's a simple definition for good and evil. Apparently, evil wasn't even generally defined, so obvious was it to the ancients. Imo, it holds as true as it ever did:
Good is that which brings forth, sustains and nourishes life, and aids it in the realization of its highest purpose. Evil is that which degrades and defiles life, and the basis on which it is brought forth.
This is why people consider sexual deviancy evil. It threatens the very basis for which an organism owes its existence.
"With homosexuals there's nothing being inherited, passed on."
Of course homosexuality is inherited. If it's genetic, which you seem convinced of, it's partially heritable, the same way all traits are. Clearly we can logically deduce it cannot be very highly heritable, but the incidence of homosexuality/deviancy among siblings etc. proves beyond doubt that it is (if we assume a genetic origin, which we surely must).
"Homosexuals come from heterosexuals." Is this parody?
"If it wasn't for the horrors of Nazism..." What horrors? The human soap, the human lampshades, the gas chambers? FFS, I cannot believe I am hearing this.
Neo-liberalism is a direct outgrowth of this absurd narrative. What does Never Again mean if Never Was in the first place? I'll tell you what it means. It means never again will the goyim be afforded the opportunity for collective self-determination.
I agree with your video, as I consider myself an autonomous nationalist or Jeffersonian myself, but whats your take on the Jewish question?
Some Jews I respect including Paul Gottfried, Michael Levin, and Norman Finkelstein, but I can't get past the fact that many of them hold impervious and incessant marxist views.
"What's prevented a Jeffersonian republicanism from being instituted is this fear of Nazism." So you acknowledge it's not the actual "Nazism", but the lies that surround it? The only reason people "fear the Nazis" is because of what the Jewish propagandists tell them. By slandering the German Greater Reich for exposing the international elements for what they were and are, you do their bidding.
You can't change history. But you can choose to revise it. And the lies won't always hide the truth.
You're only supporting the propaganda by use of the refrain "Nazi". We prefer generally to be called National Socialists. And how on EARTH is wanting to send women to compulsory rape camps a "Nazi view"?
Sorry, but this is a REAL disservice to white nationalism. There are many legitimate grounds you may have for opposing certain elements of the NS doctrine, but Hollywood slander such as this is completely non-acceptable.
The guy you are talking about sounds like what is known as an agent provocateur. I think his reason for being here is exactly what you asked him. To make us all look crazy. I don't know that nazism is anti-White, but I do know that anti-racism is code for anti-White.
I strongly disagree. It is this it this degenerate form of republican government which has paved the road to egalitarian nonsense. May democracy be destroyed!
@ProlifeVeganAryan No, I do not buy into exaggerated claims of Nazi atrocities, and I think the Holocaust industry should be shuttered.
Homosexuality is irrelevant; it should neither be encouraged nor discouraged. I don't like gay pride marches in general -- not because the people in them have same-sex attraction, but because they tend to behave perversely and advocate leftist views. Most bi/homosexuals aren't militant activists and don't participate in such events.
Most gays do tend to be leftist, but ultimately anything which lowers the overall fertility rate of white people is politically left, anything politically right raises the fertility rate of whites.
Considering homosexuals represent 77% of all new HIV/AIDS cases annually according to the CDC, yet only represent ~2-6%, I'd say they're a pretty self-destructive group.
I assume your views on transsexuality and transvestites to be similar to your views on homosexuality then?
@ProlifeVeganAryan: "ultimately anything which lowers the overall fertility rate of white people is politically left, anything politically right raises the fertility rate of whites."
The freely-made choices of white women to delay or forgo motherhood in pursuit of careers/sex with alphas who will not commit/consumerism/etc. lower the fertility rates by orders of magnitudes so great as to make the impact of homosexuals utterly insignificant.
Obviously excessive breeding will have a negative social and economic impact, but then any kind of extreme can have a negative effect on health, i.e. too much exercise, water, and even very high IQ's (possibly go insane)
Fact is a white woman who delays motherhood will still have a child, whereas gays and transsexuals (esp. post-op) are extremely unlikely to do so unless they either have lived previously as a closet gay or use IVF, leading to an untraditional family unit
@ProlifeVeganAryan: "a white woman who delays motherhood will still have a child"
Sure, but from what I understand of your position, that isn't good enough. You're concerned with fertility rates, and women who begin having children at older ages necessarily have fewer children.
In your estimation, what percentage of the fertility rate problem is caused by homosexual men and women not reproducing, and what percentage is due to heterosexual white women forgoing motherhood?
My point from my previous comment was that it's better they have some children than none at all so long as you can provide for them
I believe in the Western world, i.e. America and Britain, that the lowered fertility rate of whites by the ceaseless promotion of homosexuality is probably far more than other, more conservative, nations. Yes, fertility rate is lowered by educated women, but like I said, excessive breeding can cause a negative effect as with any extreme
So, do you take as hard-line an approach to this as you do homosexuality? Do you believe that white women's cumulative decisions to forgo child bearing to the point where fertility drops below replacement is anti-white?
I'm not sure why you want to discuss excessive breeding at this point. You want to increase fertility, so why worry about too many white babies when you're currently fighting extinction?
If white women have been educated to the point where by it lowers their fertility rate below that of replacement level (2.1) than they are committing racial suicide. Like I said, excessive amounts of anything, no matter how benign/positive they are, can have a negative/toxic effect.
Also, it's good women are educated as that makes them more able to be better parents, generally speaking. I don't know of any stats I can refer to of women who forgo motherhood so it's difficult to make a comparison to the proportion of homosexuals who are far less likely to have children.
In anycase, homosexuality has been shown, statistically, to be a very self-destructive behaviour, and thus, should be discouraged.
@ProlifeVeganAryan: "educated as that makes them more able to be better parents"
Well, if not enough educated white women are becoming parents to enough children, that's kind of a moot point when it comes to the survival of the race.
Thanks for answering my questions. I'll leave you with the recommendation that you look into the relevant data.
You may discover that tackling the homosexuality of 3-5% of the population isn't the strategy that will bring you the most success.
Well, tackling homosexuality isn't going to bring the most success, but neither is tackling race mixing, done by a minority of whites. However, the overall effects of all the combined racially destructive behaviours/views do bring about a significant effect that lowers the fertility rate of whites
"Well, if not enough educated white women are becoming parents to enough children,..."
Excessive education can inhibit fertility, not education itself
Yes, you are quite correct. The level of STD infections among homosexuals is totally out of proportion to heterosexuals. Homosexuality, if not a personal mental disorder (privately I think it is), is certainly a societal and cultural problem.
Okay, Hitler never started WW2, he didn't want to go to war with neither Britain nor America, actually Germany was quite fond of both nations.
The Holocaust is a hoax, watch this 4 hour doc to see why.
watch?v=2cgRsHqYZ9g
Why are you being so defensive of the Jews, so their white, they still function as an independent racial/ethnic group that hates white gentiles. The reason why nazism is so hated is because they lost the war against Jewish supremacy.
@ProlifeVeganAryan So what would you have gay folks do? Kill themselves? Have the state do it? Fact is some people are gay through no choice of their own (genetic vs hormonal cause isnt the point). Also gays tend to spend their resources and time on related family members which actually would have conferred a very substantial survival advantage historically on relatives.
You're making ad hominem assumptions about my character. I never implied killing gays. Homosexuals ultimately serve no real evolutionary advantage.
Have no choice? Probably not, but if it's genetic than homosexuality can be weeded out through eugenics, though that's a moral gray area.
Some people are attracted to those who are obese, very old, animals, relatives etc. Those are arguably unhealthy types of attraction, the same goes for homosexuality.
@ProlifeVeganAryan New research seems to support the theory that gay men confer a strong evolutionary advantage onto their kin. Google "Gay Super Uncle".
@smartalex1972 I strongly suspect "gay uncle" implies greater likelihood of homosexual tendencies in nephew. Any deviant tendencies genetically promulgated will weaken the ongoing survival prospects of surviving progeny.
However, I do suspect there is evidence that demonstrates our race has benefited from non-breeders being able to devote greater time and resources toward developing artistic and intellectual excellence (Michelangelo, Keynes, Turing etc.).
Google "Homosexual Group Admits Health Risks of Homosexual Behavior".
I took at the look at the link you suggested, however, I'm not convinced as heterosexual men and women who have no children are able to be super uncles and aunts and probably more mentally healthy than homsexual uncles/aunts.
I don't know if being a homosexual is a choice or not.... but I do think it's nothing short of demon possession.... I'm a Christian... but even if you're NOT.... just the simple "laws of nature" will tell you that queers are a detriment to society.... I get an overwhelming feeling of pure DISGUST, just passing by a fag in public.
@KillaCommie4Mommy Likewise I get a feeling of pure disgust when I pass someone in public who has chosen to be a Christian. At least gays dont have a choice, you do.
@KillaCommie4Mommy I never cared much about homosexuality. I think it is a personal choice whether to accept homosexuals on a social level or not. Regardless, I don't think the government should be involved in the issue at all. Homosexuality may be immoral, but I cannot accept the government having the power to arrest people for victimless crimes. I am against all government censorship and regulation of private affairs, so long as no violence has occurred.
@UltraConservative298 I'm a Christian.... NOT perfect.... but I do believe if we as a society turn a blind eye to such disgusting demonic behavior, that WE'LL be held accountable for it on judgement day too..... I freaking HATE faggots.
@KillaCommie4Mommy I have strong libertarian sympathies and detest political coercion. Do you believe the government should intervene? I believe only those who commit violent crimes and property crimes should be in prison. Personally, I believe feminism is a much greater threat than homosexuality. The overwhelming majority of the population are feminists, but only a small minority are homosexuals. The government promotes feminism through indoctrination and economic warfare.
As a subscriber to you and supporter of yours I have to say that I am disappointed by your, as other people already pointed out, reactionary response in this video. As a National Socialist I know we won't agree on every subject but to imply that because of the Nazis, the world is in the state it is in today? Not only is that incorrect but it reeks of main steam politically correct nonsense. EuropeanWatchman's personal views are just that.
@ssszar It's hypothetical, but I believe that whites would be relatively healthy psychologically and philosophically, and cultural Marxism would be relatively powerless or non-existent, if it weren't for the Nazis and the African slave trade.
@LibertarianRealist I'd also add to that list the white southerners that played right into the hands of civil rights protesters. By initiating violence on the protesters (see the freedom riders), they provided the necessary propaganda that led to a shift in values that favored self-esteem as more important than the notion of property rights.
@LibertarianRealist I would have to disagree. I would argue that because of the fact that National Socialist Germany was defeated, we now have marxism thriving in the west. Lets not forget that after the war, our government turned half of Europe over to "the gallant soviets" Germany and the the rest of the axis powers in ww2 were simply defending Europe. I would also argue against your notion that because of the Nazis, whites are now psychologically and philosophically unhealthy.
LibetarianRealist has got it all wrong on Nazism which is ashame. If Hitler had won, the history books would have made out Britain and the Allied forces as the monsters who committed atrocities that were anti-white.
@LibertarianRealist "Nazism" as you so ignorantly put was a reaction to the cultural Marxism already prevalent in the Weimar Republic at the time. I've thought this for a long time, Libertarian Realist. You are a profoundly confused man.
@LibertarianRealist We need to just look at history as history and acknowledge every races right to exist. History should never be applied to today 1) because it is incredibly complex and we cannot get into every person's thought processes during different periods of time though diaries and personal writings help and 2) Because previous generations were just that previous generations.
@LibertarianRealist You are being absolutely ridiculous. National Socialism has been the only real opposition to monetary and democratic enslavement. What you can blame Hitler for is losing the war. But he had done more than most anyone in history and if Germans are to survive he will eventually be regarded as a hero. What you can't blame him for is anti German war propaganda. It was already pretty bad when he started the opposition, god knows how much worse it would be now.
"if it weren't for the Nazis and the African slave trade."
1st If Black slaves hadn't been used then it would have been some other type of slave and there was no overall control over the TA slave trade anyway - it just emerged naturally over 4 centuries. Therefore inevitable.
2nd Nazism was an inevitable natural reaction to the rise of Judeo-Bolshevism in Europe and the massive Jewish backstabbing of Germany in WW1, over the acquisition of Palestine.
This is the most vomit inducingly reactionairy video I have seen in along time. No matter how much you wrap your views up in cotten wool the left will always regard you as a nazi and a fascist. The mainstream media calls Patrick Buchannan a Fascist Nazi and even he wouldn't want to touch your views with a bargepole.
unsubbed. You give the left ammunition by making us look weak when you make bitch out videos like this. Jefferson impregnated teen black girls, so he is hardly a model for realists.
The idea of compulsory rape camps for White women being brought up poisons your viewership's ability to judge your ideas on their own merits, JUST like it obviously didn't help YOUR poisoned ability to judge National Socialism on its own merits.
(Retired) Oxford Professor of Biology and militant Atheism advocate Richard Dawkins thinks that the idea that "rape is wrong" is morally arbitrary: /watch?v=ISYvY-AvhJQ
& believes that there is 'no such thing as "evil"', has no strict moral objection to infanticide and finds it difficult to argue against (the ideas of) Hitler in moral terms: /watch?v=OO_wywhZBEc
EuropeanWatchman also describes RD's latest work "The Greatest Show On Earth" as "the best argument for eugenics I have ever read..."
EuropeanWatchman 1 week ago
It's not the Nazi's fault ignoramuses fail to see reason, it's their own fault.
JSona100 2 weeks ago
That is not National socialism, i can say the dumbest thin in the world and say .. im a liberal .. or im a nazi it dosnt work this way
MrBalkanSoldier 3 weeks ago in playlist More videos from LibertarianRealist
Just thought I'd run this video by some of LibertarianRealists subscribers (not LibertarianRealist himself of course because Libertarian"Realist" is apparently too afraid to debate me), who may also subscribe to his apparent view that certain historical events would have probably happened anyway had there been no Jews present at those times: /watch?v=_uNKAmEuSR8 In minute 22: "In the Soviet seizure of power in Russia, the Jewish role was probably critical."
EuropeanWatchman 4 weeks ago
Why is this flagged?
ing0lfr 1 month ago in playlist More videos from LibertarianRealist
I would say that a large portion of southern Americans are also just as guilty as the Nazis.
BarbaricMoose 1 month ago
@LibertarianRealist To rid whites of guilt over Nazism is to reveal the truth, as in the historical facts. FDR was a liar who tried to start a war with Hitler 3 years prior to the U.S. entering WWII, and basically orchestrated Pearl Harbor. FDR had one intention, and that was to destroy Western Civilization. It was FDR who was responsible for WWII not Hitler. Hitler's war was with communism. Oh and by the way approximately 100,000 people died at Auschwitz, 80,000 from natural causes.
FREESPEECHforWHITES 2 months ago
:DDDDDDDDD
KimJongPlato 2 months ago
At a rate of 100 deposits per 24 hour period I reckon it could be mathematically feasible to wipe out roughly 50,000,000 chosen subjects within two years, with a fleet of only 1,000 death ships, give or take a few.
Of course I don't want to have to do it this way and of course I am always hopeful of a peaceful, non-violent, non-forceful solution, but I'm just saying... - IT CAN BE DONE! - Relatively easily in fact...
europeanwatchman.blogspot.com/
KimJongPlato 2 months ago
- And before you say that this couldn't be done for practical reason, I tell you yes it can be! – One possible solution is to simply herd them all into converted oils tankers designed to drop weighted shipping crates into the ocean, at an appointed time and under most whether conditions.
KimJongPlato 2 months ago
Whenever I make such statements I do not do so as a joke and I am deadly serious. - I apologize if it offends you but in my opinion and under THESE circumstances, THIS MUST HAPPEN. – Indeed there is simply no acceptable excuse for it NOT to happen!
KimJongPlato 2 months ago
Now, I don't like this, I don't want this, I don't feel comfortable about being exposed to massive outrage and vilification by millions of brainwashed lemmings, but under very specific and unique circumstances, that we may yet avoid (and I hope we do), I think it necessary...
Very necessary...
KimJongPlato 2 months ago
This of course isn't just limited to forced reproduction, but may actually also include state sanctioned mass ethnic genocide as well. – To be enacted under extreme and very specifically awkward circumstances to be sure, yet provided to our people as a possible last resort option nonetheless.
KimJongPlato 2 months ago
"Blacks through mass immigration, could take over a country in Europe."
Which is precisely why under these very specific and hitherto unknown circumstances, extreme options which would have probably been as distasteful to Adolf Hitler as they so apparently are to yourself, are most necessary. - Not just for the retention of our Civilization, but also for the reenablement of such a retentive capacity in the first instance.
KimJongPlato 2 months ago
EuropeanWatchman is a genious!
KimJongPlato 2 months ago
This video is so 5lbs. of truth in a 1lb. bag.
All of it.
Thank you, LibertarianRealist.
SPQRImperator 2 months ago
I think LR is confusing Nazism with hatred... the "Neo-Nazi" trash are not true national socialists and would not have been accepted in Germany 1930-45.
National Socialism is a political ideology not based in hate, but preservation and self-determination. Skinheads and white trash are nothing more than enemies to this cause.
NewTeutonicOrder2 2 months ago
@NewTeutonicOrder2 Socialism = central economic planning. Nazi Germany was a fascist totalitarian regime, devoid of individual liberty. You should no that totalitarian government has nothing to do with preservation and self-determination. On the contrary, it results in the DESTRUCTION of the family and the DOWNFALL of civilized society.
UltraConservative298 2 months ago
@UltraConservative298 Nice, it's cool you've clearly been indoctrinated into propaganda by the winners of the war. But it was not a totalitarian government and they valued individual rights while pressing for equality amongst their people. I know you probably also think they were out for world domination, but reality is they didn't declare war on Britain/France and were just trying to unite what was wrongfully taken from them in the Treaty of Versailles.
NewTeutonicOrder2 2 months ago
@NewTeutonicOrder2 Of course, because we all know liberty exists under central economic planning.
UltraConservative298 2 months ago
@NewTeutoni
Really I thought Poland had their land taken wrongfully by the Prussians, Austrians, and Russians in the late 1800s! Those borders switched all the time and it was not "rightfully theirs". They lost WWI and their government signed the Treaty. Whether it was a wise treaty for the winners to create and for the Germans to sign is a different matter. Nazis agreed to split Poland with the Soviets and made a non aggression pact with them to be able to fight UK/France.
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance That shows how little you know about the war and the Treaty of Versailles. Study more, than come back plz.
NewTeutonicOrder2 2 months ago
@NewTeutonicOrder2
Actually I do not about the war and the treaty. I also know that those borders were not always Germany's or the Holy Roman Empire's. The British blockade of Germany was starving the Germans in WWI, the United States had the largest economy in the world with high moral troops that entered, and the promises by the German government for quick victory against France failed. The German government ordered its delegates to do whatever it took to end the war.
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
*Actually I do know about the War and the Treaty.
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
"Murderous Stalinists are now in the role of Academics and Mainstream. They exploit the crimes of Nazis and sugar-coat the horrors of Communism"
This is my summary of your video.
My question is, why instead trying to Sugar-Coat NS and infiltrate the Mainstream... you support further demonization of NS germany and support for "outsiders" (far-right libertarians, which NEVER will win)????
NSWPHive 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Is this nothing like what you believe? /watch?v=n03q-8KhY7s&feature=share Your anti nazism is treasonous to white people and immoral.
Dysentery7885 2 months ago
Comment removed
Dysentery7885 2 months ago
Excellent video. I will make a response hopefully showing how Nazi Germany was a white traitor country.
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance Completely agree. I don't understand how so many white nationalists support Nazi Germany. They even admit that they are national socialists. Socialism = tyranny. How difficult is that to understand? There is no liberty when the government is in control of the economy. I am fairly nationalistic in my views, but I am an economic policy non-interventionist, and completely anti-socialist.
UltraConservative298 2 months ago
What petty conflicts. We are all on the same side, it's just far-right WN against moderate WN.I have nothing against NEO-nazism, it is basically the "extreme" of moderate white nationalism. I am not a Nazi, but I see no point to cause tension or further fragmentation amongst Nationalists. I believe in Freedom and homogenous nations - What neo-nazi would give up the former for totalitarianism? Do our people not deserve freedom within a homogenous nation? Ultimately we fight for the same thing.
Lord0Xel 2 months ago
Cont: I don't know much about EuropeanWatchman, but if he advocates rape for White Women (in any form or for any reason), he is human trash. If you had to power to force rape on our women, wouldn't you have the power to create a homogenous nation? Then that wouldnt be "necessary" now would it? Low Birth rates? In an all white nation, a demographic could fluxuate and rebound without being destroyed - We lost 30-50% of our pop during the black plague and lived. Just deport all foreigners!
Lord0Xel 2 months ago
Sorry guys! LibertarianRealist doesn't want me to express my opinions/views/thoughts/arguments/clarafications/qualifications on his comments areas anymore, so if you want a reponse from me you'll have to mail me directly.
Thanks for all the support btw! - I wasn't expecting it...
EuropeanWatchman 2 months ago
On free speech I agree. It's pointless to censor speech, and it's much more effective to show why it is inaccurate, or unworthy of heeding. I wont say that censorship of Mein Kampf, for ex., by the same people that call us both 'nazi' no matter what we say about them, is somehow ok, when the only reason some dont want people reading it is because they know there are many obviously true statements in it. You've never been censored by 'Nazis', or called 'nazi' or even 'racist' by one either!
DeltaNordicAdvance 2 months ago
@DeltaNordicAdvance "In the 1950s, hostility to the record of Nazi racial atrocities tainted attempts to restore Darwinism to the social sciences. From that time on, it became increasingly difficult to suggest that individuals or groups might differ genetically in behavior without being accused of Nazi sympathies." -charlesdarwinresearch
LibertarianRealist 2 months ago
@LibertarianRealist So it was a result of a massive propaganda campaign, then wasn't it? And you are blaming who for the propaganda - the ones pushing it? Why did the public allow what were largely Soviet fabrications to dictate how they thought? Much of those so called 'racial atrocities' didn't even happen, at least not according to the Red Cross that was in Germany at the time, so you are blaming people for lies that were told against them too? You're swatting at phantoms.
DeltaNordicAdvance 2 months ago
If someone is born with a complete lack of sex drive, or complete infertility -- is that only considered a 'disease' if it causes the person a sense of being deprived?
Or, do we use a common understanding that the purpose of an individual life is one that includes reproduction?
Maybe genetically based mental feebleness is not a 'disease' -- so long as the individual is 'happy'.
You see the problem now don't you.
mindprism 2 months ago
So even if you want to protray AH as evil, and don't want to talk about 'who was more evil' between he and Stalin, you have to at accept that AH wanted to fight the Soviets, leave the British Empire alone, and the US and GB attacked Germany first. Even Pat Buchanan, who is no friend or supporter of AH, and who didn't refer to any so called 'revisionist' histories , still concluded that and that AH was a much better statesman and strategist than WC. Hate them, fine but admit that much ffs.
DeltaNordicAdvance 2 months ago 4
@DeltaNordicAdvance twill be a cold day in Hell when that happens.
LemonDancer 3 weeks ago
You are saying: do nothing to protect the white race because the enemy's reaction is counterproductive to our goal of doing nothing? Nazi action to ensure a healthy, productive, and independent fatherland for whites was a risk. It failed primarily because of the Marxist positions of power in the US allied with marxist jews in Russia. The defunct Nazi party is defamed by propaganda, but its values are essential to white survival. Your mistake is to confound its values with comments from crazies.
PowerForGood 2 months ago
You also know that the reason I said "since we're talking about hypotheticals" was because you are saying that "whites would be better off if.." , which is also hypothetical. I'm not even defending totalitarianism either, but on aesthetic grounds and on pure factual grounds, you really are not portraying this accurately. England attacked Germany first of all. Hitler was far more willing to keep peace with England than vise versa. Germans were then starved and murdered by Soviets and Americans.
DeltaNordicAdvance 2 months ago
You have your video flagged by anti whites, and by that I don't mean 'nazis' in any way, shape of form. So you had to change you title so as not to appear pro-white in any way whatsoever. But you still blame 'nazis' for this? And the word 'nazi' is like 'racist' , it's all over the place depending on who is using it and for what reason. I would expect that after you got your vid flagged and you changed the title, you'd at least change the focus of blame, since it's obvious who and what it is.
DeltaNordicAdvance 2 months ago
@DeltaNordicAdvance I'm not going to argue history. I'm arguing that even if I accept your view of it, we'd be better off TODAY not associating favorably with Nazi personalities, symbology, or ideology.
'Nazi' has a specific meaning unlike 'racist'. Liking Nazi art or the autobahn is fine. I like some things about Christianity.
On what grounds should I assume that Nazis are defenders of free speech for anyone but themselves? I've found them to be no more principled than their enemies.
LibertarianRealist 2 months ago 11
@LibertarianRealist Ok so on that first part you're conceding a victory to the same people that will label you 'nazi' whether or not you actually are or even like them. That is a large part of the problem - you and I are going to be called 'nazis' anyway, just for being biological realists, regardless of our statements of allegiance or association. That's a big reason why I dropped the reluctance to associate or admire much of their symbolism, aesthetic, vision and passion.
DeltaNordicAdvance 2 months ago
@LibertarianRealist
the lesser of the two evils sort of argument?
quite a slippery slope you've decided to stand on.
Sight099 2 months ago in playlist racial politics
Also do not take EuropeanWatchman as a leading voice on Nazism. He seems to not have the minimal idea of what Nazism is.
Finally: I'm not saying Nazism was perfect. It made several wrong things. But for those same things you should condemn the Allied powers that were making similar things too. You have to check the facts, otherwise you will be making just straw man arguments.
Jaluzaga 2 months ago
Your interpretation of nazism is like that made by Hannah Arendt and Zbignew Brezensky.
Germany was a wonderful country after Hitler took the power. Check at the facts: more wealth, more intelligence, more pride when Hitler ruled Germany.
You can also check the revival of economy during Hitler.
Check the lectures by Paul Gottfried: "Stalinism, National Socialism, and Fascism"; and Hans-Hermann Hoppe: "The Economic Doctrine of the Nazis".
Mark Weber has also mentioned that subject.
Jaluzaga 2 months ago
Hitler was no threat to USA and England, he wanted to make an alliance with them, he saw their population as blood brothers to the Germans.
If you can't get the true facts then you can't make a good judgement.
Hitler comitted suicide because he did not wanted to end up like Mussolini.
Jaluzaga 2 months ago
Hitler was forced into that war, he did not wanted war. You can check, for example, Liddell Hart, J.F.C. Fuller, and this documentary will show how Germany was forced into that war, and how that war began not by Germany invading Poland but by France, and other countries denying the right of self determination to the German population living in those countries (Alsace and Loraine, Sudetes, Danzig, etc.). The documentary is called "Hitler's War - What the Historians Neglect to Mention"
Jaluzaga 2 months ago
Dude, you are so wrong on the facts.
By 1941, it was believed that Germany was going to win the war. Even by the Stalingrad Battle people thought Germany was going to win.
Hitler was no delusional, he was one of the most clever politicians in the history. You can check the books he read.
Jaluzaga 2 months ago
Nazism or stalinism are for mentally retarded people.
Nevertheless is not unlikely that the conditions that allowed nazism to rise to power,to be repeated and similar political movements to rise to power.
AmetReloads 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hitler was a disaster cause he had multiple oppertunities to win the war but blew it. Fuck him.
stevie6621 2 months ago
Say what you will about the tenets of National Socialism, dude, but at least it's an ethos.
SeamofConsciousness 2 months ago
It doesn't really matter which political system is set upon Europeans when there are no Jews present. We will reach Mars with National Socialism or with Racial Libertarianism - just deport the Jews and destroy modern democracy.
sledgeij 2 months ago
@lastwhiteman205 ello if u abollish womans rites then u act like muslimbs so diss means u r no bettar than them witch means wite womin shud marry blacks and muslimbs cuz they will bee treeted bettar. moore black babys!! yippee
seanallansmommy 2 months ago
@tracemckenzie2009 I can't even take you seriously. You're in denial of both history and the present.How about apartheid illegitimate stolen state of Israel.. I guess your rationale would describe why they are having such a hard time, lol. As far as Africa, 1/3 of it has been colonized by Arabs, another 1/3 stolen from San by genocidal Bantu in the last 1500 years. Europeans are down on themselves due to modern demoralization brainwashing from childhood, not historical events
DeltaNordicAdvance 2 months ago
@EuropeanWatchman
Most people are so stupid they don't even know the opposite to eugenics, which is dysgenics.
Eugenics, meaning to genetically upgrade a population through selective breeding.
Dysgenics, meaning to genetically degrade a population through unselective breeding where the inferior have more offspring than the superior, thus leading to degeneration.
ProlifeVeganAryan 2 months ago
@EuropeanWatchman i agrea i fink u shud rape me ridgid i will give u wite kidz
seanallansmommy 2 months ago
I think you are wrong on some facts on Nazism. I'll make a response.
Jaluzaga 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SEE EUROPEANWATCHMAN'S REPLY TO LIBERTARIAN REALIST HERE: europeanwatchman.blogspot.com/
EuropeanWatchman 2 months ago
so you take the insane prescriptions of some troll EW as a springboard into a far flung hypothetical? If you are going to detract from NS then at least do so against what it really is instead of strawmanning it and blaming it for the propaganda of it's opponents. If you are going to let the opponents of White people in general dictate the discourse so much that anything they point at incessantly immediately gets your stamp of approval for blame, then hand them the towell, like nazis or not.
FarFromEquilibrium 2 months ago
@tracemckenzie2009
You're confused. It was, and still is, Judaism that has both psychologically and physically damages white people, if anything Nazism defends and wakes white people up to our enemy, Jewish supremacy
For goodness sake, do some research before spewing out anti-German/pro-Jewish propaganda, you lot are beginning to sound like liberals full of white guilt
The Holocaust NEVER happened
Please watch this doc, cheers
Holocaust fact or fiction
watch?v=2cgRsHqYZ9
ProlifeVeganAryan 2 months ago 2
@ProlifeVeganAryan The Nazis slaughtered specific ethnic groups (not just Jews), +gays, the mentally ill, disabled & political prisoners in euthanasia progs, shootings & gassings. If they didn't, where did all these people disappear to? A one way flight to the moon? Are the vids all fabricated? Are the documents fabricated? Are the witnesses all liars? For this reason, anyone who now criticizes a societal subgroup is termed as a "Nazi". You have the Nazis to thank for that
tracemckenzie2009 2 months ago
@tracemckenzie2009
To this day, no one has ever been able to substantially prove that millions of people were somehow gassed to death in homicidal gas chambers as a deliberate policy of Adolf Hitler during the Second World War.
All we have in support of this claim are a handful of rather dodgey "eye wittness" reports from Jews, from Soviet torture victims and from people who have been lent on by certain powerful lobby groups.
Indeed there is actually more evidence against.
EuropeanWatchman 2 months ago
@EuropeanWatchman The 6 million figure seems questionable even to me. Nevertheless, Jews, gypos, gays, mentally and physically disabled, homeless people and political prisoners disappeared in great big bleeding batches - to the tune of of millions. There are documents, videos, eyewitnesses, and the disappearance to support this. Next you will say that 9/11 and the Japanese tsunami never happened
tracemckenzie2009 2 months ago
@tracemckenzie2009
All I'm going to say is that you're a lazy individual who obviously can't bother 4 hours of your time to question an historical event that never happened which has psychogically scarred white people into self-hate.
I'm a troll because of what excactly? I can produce videos as good, if not better than most other youtubers. You only call me such because I disagree, grow up and quit being so intellectually lazy.
ProlifeVeganAryan 2 months ago
@tracemckenzie2009
Just watch the doc please, and all your questions will be answered, or is that too much to ask?
Holocaust - fact or fiction?
watch?v=2cgRsHqYZ9g
Euthanasia is a moral grey area. Political prisoners were sent, along with Jews into LABOUR CAMPS, to work!
Also, I suggest you check out this site for further info
nazigassings(dot)com
ProlifeVeganAryan 2 months ago
@ProlifeVeganAryan Oh, so the millions that disappeared went into thin air? The eyewitnesses are all liars? The documents are all forged? The videos are all fake? The mass burnings were all fabricated? Its Ok to kill disabled and homeless people? Next you'll be saying that that the Japanese and Thai tsunamis were all fake and that 9/11 was a mirage. Go away, troll
tracemckenzie2009 2 months ago
If only the Nazis won
RoyalMessup 2 months ago 3
One of the most intelligent and rewarding videos that I have ever watched on You Tube.
atticana 2 months ago
@atticana You should watch his other vids then, they are even ten times better!
DeltaNordicAdvance 2 months ago
@atticana He's got far better vids, in fact almost all of them are much better and more impeccably argued.
FarFromEquilibrium 2 months ago
@MrHerrIQ2, I wish that fat bastard would have realized that when the peace martyr Rudolf Hess parachuted into Scotland in 1941.
DIEversity103 2 months ago 5
Adolf Hitler never advocated compulsory rape lol. You can't take the views of a few internet phantoms and ascribe them to a whole ideology.
It's a shame that we Europeans are still infected with the semitic lust to destroy eachother over belief....
DIEversity103 2 months ago 5
What is wrong with occultism and reincarnation? Many occult sciences are true.
SAEuropeanPatriot 2 months ago
@NAZIBASTARD2 Learn to use the English language to a basic level before criticizing him. No wonder white Europe is going down with illiterate retards like you being born into it
tracemckenzie2009 2 months ago
Comment removed
SAEuropeanPatriot 2 months ago
@ProlifeVeganAryan LOL Why would gay pride parades be something anti-white? LOL! You guys are all sick! Just get a life, so maybe you can see though the skin of someone. If gay people adopt they can have have white children, but they are more intelligent, for them is not important to be white or blakc, it's just being!
MrBastilleCreole 2 months ago
I think that poster doesn't understand what it means to be Aryan (noble). Rape camps? If the state is going to sanction rape than what is the point in getting rid of niggers? If a specie isn't willing to fuck to save itself than good riddance to it. Our mission is not to be white niggers and start raping everyone, but to wake our people up to the beauty of our kind that they may WANT to proudly be responsible for carrying it into the future.
14ByTheSword 2 months ago 2
@14ByTheSword, this is the best comment ever XD.
SAEuropeanPatriot 2 months ago
Thanks
carcabe 2 months ago
Thomas Jefferson was a lousy thinker unworthy of the veneration given to him.
OldSchopenhauer 2 months ago
Nazism as it is meant to be lived from the 30's is most certainly not, anti-white. Nazism as internet people live it now is most certainly anti-white, because it has been perverted to be more anti-Jew and pro-Islam than it is pro-Aryan and pro-community/family.
XmXFLUXmX2 2 months ago
Rape camps for white women? Obviously just a troll.
CeltoSaxonKnight 2 months ago 5
You should watch my feature vid.The modern Europe is Hitlers dream come true.Mass immigration is probably a Nazi plan to revive the fascist movement
infidel1978 2 months ago
Black America has a low I.Q because of their women refusing to breed with educated and hard work black American men but choose thugs and jail bait.And people that are always in jail 9 out of 10 tend to have low I.Q in the UK 60% of prisoners have ADHD.Anyway these guys breed with skipping from women to women then the offspring grow up without the family structure and the same cycle continues.Within 2-3 generations you end up with a whole community with low I.Q and high crime.
infidel1978 2 months ago
If "decent" people are willing to question racial egalitarianism and approach the topic with a genuinely open mind, they can do the same with National Socialism. The David Dukes and Jared Taylors play an important part, but ultimately we will need more Matt Hales and Tom Metzgers.
RoyalMessup 2 months ago
So, basically Jews make a bunch of anti-white propaganda, and you blame National Socialism for it, rather than. You know. the Jews.
DivusJuIius 2 months ago 14
@DivusJuIius You know what these respectable conservative types are like... But this video appears to be outright trolling.
thespacialone 2 months ago
@thespacialone I think all the Randian ultra-capitalist right wing indoctrination screwed his mind up.
DivusJuIius 2 months ago 3
@thespacialone Possibly. I think he's not who he says he is. The Nazi = Evil imagery tells you it's not to be taken seriously. Maybe it's some sort of attempt at reverse programming, maybe it's trollery, maybe it's kikery. To whom is the Swastika evil? Only the people who seek to destroy Arya.
thespacialone 2 months ago 2
Comment removed
GhostOfJayLeno 2 months ago
Comment removed
GhostOfJayLeno 2 months ago
SEE EUROPEANWATCHMAN'S REPLY TO LIBERTARIAN REALIST HERE: europeanwatchman.blogspot.com/
EuropeanWatchman 2 months ago
@EuropeanWatchman You are a psychologically ill troll, no less
tracemckenzie2009 2 months ago
Comment removed
EuropeanWatchman 2 months ago
Totalitarianism is a problem, Nazi aesthetics are not bad at all, and did a lot to lift a suffering German people out of their Wiemar hell. So the US and UK decided to attack them and save the communists, how great that's been for us all! I would agree if you attacked totalitarianism and dictatorial governments , but seriously , the West chose communism over Naziism, and has destroyed itself in doing so. History is what it is. The sickness afflicting Europe has been commie-kosher, not "Nazi".
DeltaNordicAdvance 2 months ago 2
The gay issue is a diversion. There are reproductive problems with it, aesthetic problems , but it's the feminization and marginalization per se, of White men , that is the biggest problem. Additionally, media efforts to subconsciously program white women to like black men and reject white men is a huge problem. How much that has lead to homosexuality I can't say , but I'm sure it's got a lot to do with the roles and aesthetics of gays, which are a feminizing problem.
DeltaNordicAdvance 2 months ago 5
6:40 I don't regard homosexuality as a disease, but what you are talking about is a pathogen, homosexuality is not a PATHOGEN. a disease is an abnormality that impairs the function of the organism, regardless of cause. incidently your arguement would entail that Cystic Fibrosis was not a disease. To answer the question "Is homosexuality a disease?" we must ask. Do homosexuals find their condition debilitating?
Aletheophile 2 months ago
@Aletheophile My understanding is that many physical and psychological ailments, higher suicides, reduced life expectancy etc. accompany homosexual activity.
Does this make it a disease? Why not simply a dysfunction (in that such predilections needn't be acted upon)?
Homosexuality is the end of the genetic line, genes committing suicide. It would make sense for their kin support their self-value by encouraging ways they might "live on" through some creative non-biological legacy.
thespacialone 2 months ago
The fear of naziism is a joke. It's not realistic to say that cult. marxists have ascended because of nazis. That's like blacks saying that they are so poorly behaved because of all the "oppression they feel". The fear is a problem, but it's the fear of a phantom, not a real thing, therefore it's fallacious, media driven, and irrelevant to reality.
watch?v=HZWlZ9-QHA4&feature=channel_video_title
as much as I hated to agree with this at one time, it doesn't bother me that I agree with it now.
DeltaNordicAdvance 2 months ago 2
Hitler fought for nobility, he fought for Arya; and only through nobility, honor, vigilance, purpose, conscience, devotion, elitism, excellence, beauty, warrior spirit, and the image of god; the "white" race will not perish.
Life is War! Hail Victory!
AryasVahter 2 months ago 2
I disagree with this video. Nazism has much more than racial hygiene, it has a strong moral compass. Your never gonna get anywhere with this non-sense about whiteness. During Nazi Germnay the world got mnay important and historic innovations such as motorways, psychology, medicine, medical knowledge, therapy, and much more. About 200 years ago under christianity, the white european people were killing eachother and living in housed mad of hay and wood.
FreeBDesh 2 months ago
There's a simple definition for good and evil. Apparently, evil wasn't even generally defined, so obvious was it to the ancients. Imo, it holds as true as it ever did:
Good is that which brings forth, sustains and nourishes life, and aids it in the realization of its highest purpose. Evil is that which degrades and defiles life, and the basis on which it is brought forth.
This is why people consider sexual deviancy evil. It threatens the very basis for which an organism owes its existence.
thespacialone 2 months ago
"With homosexuals there's nothing being inherited, passed on."
Of course homosexuality is inherited. If it's genetic, which you seem convinced of, it's partially heritable, the same way all traits are. Clearly we can logically deduce it cannot be very highly heritable, but the incidence of homosexuality/deviancy among siblings etc. proves beyond doubt that it is (if we assume a genetic origin, which we surely must).
"Homosexuals come from heterosexuals." Is this parody?
thespacialone 2 months ago
"If it wasn't for the horrors of Nazism..." What horrors? The human soap, the human lampshades, the gas chambers? FFS, I cannot believe I am hearing this.
Neo-liberalism is a direct outgrowth of this absurd narrative. What does Never Again mean if Never Was in the first place? I'll tell you what it means. It means never again will the goyim be afforded the opportunity for collective self-determination.
You're really not one of us, are you?
thespacialone 2 months ago 2
I agree with your video, as I consider myself an autonomous nationalist or Jeffersonian myself, but whats your take on the Jewish question?
Some Jews I respect including Paul Gottfried, Michael Levin, and Norman Finkelstein, but I can't get past the fact that many of them hold impervious and incessant marxist views.
spartans724 2 months ago
"What's prevented a Jeffersonian republicanism from being instituted is this fear of Nazism." So you acknowledge it's not the actual "Nazism", but the lies that surround it? The only reason people "fear the Nazis" is because of what the Jewish propagandists tell them. By slandering the German Greater Reich for exposing the international elements for what they were and are, you do their bidding.
You can't change history. But you can choose to revise it. And the lies won't always hide the truth.
thespacialone 2 months ago
You're only supporting the propaganda by use of the refrain "Nazi". We prefer generally to be called National Socialists. And how on EARTH is wanting to send women to compulsory rape camps a "Nazi view"?
Sorry, but this is a REAL disservice to white nationalism. There are many legitimate grounds you may have for opposing certain elements of the NS doctrine, but Hollywood slander such as this is completely non-acceptable.
thespacialone 2 months ago 5
The guy you are talking about sounds like what is known as an agent provocateur. I think his reason for being here is exactly what you asked him. To make us all look crazy. I don't know that nazism is anti-White, but I do know that anti-racism is code for anti-White.
thorson31 2 months ago
I strongly disagree. It is this it this degenerate form of republican government which has paved the road to egalitarian nonsense. May democracy be destroyed!
OldSchopenhauer 2 months ago 5
I would rather be a Nazi than a Communist.
RoyalMessup 2 months ago 6
You could just as well argue, since we're talking hypothetical, that if the nazis had won we'd all be better off too ^^
DeltaNordicAdvance 2 months ago in playlist More videos from LibertarianRealist
@ProlifeVeganAryan No, I do not buy into exaggerated claims of Nazi atrocities, and I think the Holocaust industry should be shuttered.
Homosexuality is irrelevant; it should neither be encouraged nor discouraged. I don't like gay pride marches in general -- not because the people in them have same-sex attraction, but because they tend to behave perversely and advocate leftist views. Most bi/homosexuals aren't militant activists and don't participate in such events.
LibertarianRealist 2 months ago 16
@LibertarianRealist
Most gays do tend to be leftist, but ultimately anything which lowers the overall fertility rate of white people is politically left, anything politically right raises the fertility rate of whites.
Considering homosexuals represent 77% of all new HIV/AIDS cases annually according to the CDC, yet only represent ~2-6%, I'd say they're a pretty self-destructive group.
I assume your views on transsexuality and transvestites to be similar to your views on homosexuality then?
ProlifeVeganAryan 2 months ago
@ProlifeVeganAryan: "ultimately anything which lowers the overall fertility rate of white people is politically left, anything politically right raises the fertility rate of whites."
The freely-made choices of white women to delay or forgo motherhood in pursuit of careers/sex with alphas who will not commit/consumerism/etc. lower the fertility rates by orders of magnitudes so great as to make the impact of homosexuals utterly insignificant.
Where do you stand on this?
Eincrou 2 months ago
@Eincrou
Obviously excessive breeding will have a negative social and economic impact, but then any kind of extreme can have a negative effect on health, i.e. too much exercise, water, and even very high IQ's (possibly go insane)
Fact is a white woman who delays motherhood will still have a child, whereas gays and transsexuals (esp. post-op) are extremely unlikely to do so unless they either have lived previously as a closet gay or use IVF, leading to an untraditional family unit
ProlifeVeganAryan 2 months ago
@ProlifeVeganAryan: "a white woman who delays motherhood will still have a child"
Sure, but from what I understand of your position, that isn't good enough. You're concerned with fertility rates, and women who begin having children at older ages necessarily have fewer children.
In your estimation, what percentage of the fertility rate problem is caused by homosexual men and women not reproducing, and what percentage is due to heterosexual white women forgoing motherhood?
Eincrou 2 months ago
@Eincrou
My point from my previous comment was that it's better they have some children than none at all so long as you can provide for them
I believe in the Western world, i.e. America and Britain, that the lowered fertility rate of whites by the ceaseless promotion of homosexuality is probably far more than other, more conservative, nations. Yes, fertility rate is lowered by educated women, but like I said, excessive breeding can cause a negative effect as with any extreme
ProlifeVeganAryan 2 months ago
@ProlifeVeganAryan: "fertility rate is lowered by educated women..."
So, do you take as hard-line an approach to this as you do homosexuality? Do you believe that white women's cumulative decisions to forgo child bearing to the point where fertility drops below replacement is anti-white?
I'm not sure why you want to discuss excessive breeding at this point. You want to increase fertility, so why worry about too many white babies when you're currently fighting extinction?
Eincrou 2 months ago
@Eincrou
If white women have been educated to the point where by it lowers their fertility rate below that of replacement level (2.1) than they are committing racial suicide. Like I said, excessive amounts of anything, no matter how benign/positive they are, can have a negative/toxic effect.
The primary job of a woman is to raise children.
ProlifeVeganAryan 2 months ago
@Eincrou
Also, it's good women are educated as that makes them more able to be better parents, generally speaking. I don't know of any stats I can refer to of women who forgo motherhood so it's difficult to make a comparison to the proportion of homosexuals who are far less likely to have children.
In anycase, homosexuality has been shown, statistically, to be a very self-destructive behaviour, and thus, should be discouraged.
ProlifeVeganAryan 2 months ago
@ProlifeVeganAryan: "educated as that makes them more able to be better parents"
Well, if not enough educated white women are becoming parents to enough children, that's kind of a moot point when it comes to the survival of the race.
Thanks for answering my questions. I'll leave you with the recommendation that you look into the relevant data.
You may discover that tackling the homosexuality of 3-5% of the population isn't the strategy that will bring you the most success.
Eincrou 2 months ago
@Eincrou
Well, tackling homosexuality isn't going to bring the most success, but neither is tackling race mixing, done by a minority of whites. However, the overall effects of all the combined racially destructive behaviours/views do bring about a significant effect that lowers the fertility rate of whites
"Well, if not enough educated white women are becoming parents to enough children,..."
Excessive education can inhibit fertility, not education itself
ProlifeVeganAryan 2 months ago
@ProlifeVeganAryan
Yes, you are quite correct. The level of STD infections among homosexuals is totally out of proportion to heterosexuals. Homosexuality, if not a personal mental disorder (privately I think it is), is certainly a societal and cultural problem.
EuropeanWatchman 2 months ago
@LibertarianRealist
Okay, Hitler never started WW2, he didn't want to go to war with neither Britain nor America, actually Germany was quite fond of both nations.
The Holocaust is a hoax, watch this 4 hour doc to see why.
watch?v=2cgRsHqYZ9g
Why are you being so defensive of the Jews, so their white, they still function as an independent racial/ethnic group that hates white gentiles. The reason why nazism is so hated is because they lost the war against Jewish supremacy.
ProlifeVeganAryan 2 months ago
@ProlifeVeganAryan So what would you have gay folks do? Kill themselves? Have the state do it? Fact is some people are gay through no choice of their own (genetic vs hormonal cause isnt the point). Also gays tend to spend their resources and time on related family members which actually would have conferred a very substantial survival advantage historically on relatives.
smartalex1972 2 months ago
@smartalex1972
You're making ad hominem assumptions about my character. I never implied killing gays. Homosexuals ultimately serve no real evolutionary advantage.
Have no choice? Probably not, but if it's genetic than homosexuality can be weeded out through eugenics, though that's a moral gray area.
Some people are attracted to those who are obese, very old, animals, relatives etc. Those are arguably unhealthy types of attraction, the same goes for homosexuality.
ProlifeVeganAryan 2 months ago
@ProlifeVeganAryan New research seems to support the theory that gay men confer a strong evolutionary advantage onto their kin. Google "Gay Super Uncle".
smartalex1972 2 months ago
@smartalex1972 I strongly suspect "gay uncle" implies greater likelihood of homosexual tendencies in nephew. Any deviant tendencies genetically promulgated will weaken the ongoing survival prospects of surviving progeny.
However, I do suspect there is evidence that demonstrates our race has benefited from non-breeders being able to devote greater time and resources toward developing artistic and intellectual excellence (Michelangelo, Keynes, Turing etc.).
Key = management, rational debate?
thespacialone 2 months ago
@smartalex1972
Google "Homosexual Group Admits Health Risks of Homosexual Behavior".
I took at the look at the link you suggested, however, I'm not convinced as heterosexual men and women who have no children are able to be super uncles and aunts and probably more mentally healthy than homsexual uncles/aunts.
ProlifeVeganAryan 2 months ago
I don't know if being a homosexual is a choice or not.... but I do think it's nothing short of demon possession.... I'm a Christian... but even if you're NOT.... just the simple "laws of nature" will tell you that queers are a detriment to society.... I get an overwhelming feeling of pure DISGUST, just passing by a fag in public.
KillaCommie4Mommy 2 months ago 3
@KillaCommie4Mommy Likewise I get a feeling of pure disgust when I pass someone in public who has chosen to be a Christian. At least gays dont have a choice, you do.
smartalex1972 2 months ago
@KillaCommie4Mommy I never cared much about homosexuality. I think it is a personal choice whether to accept homosexuals on a social level or not. Regardless, I don't think the government should be involved in the issue at all. Homosexuality may be immoral, but I cannot accept the government having the power to arrest people for victimless crimes. I am against all government censorship and regulation of private affairs, so long as no violence has occurred.
UltraConservative298 2 months ago
@UltraConservative298 I'm a Christian.... NOT perfect.... but I do believe if we as a society turn a blind eye to such disgusting demonic behavior, that WE'LL be held accountable for it on judgement day too..... I freaking HATE faggots.
KillaCommie4Mommy 2 months ago
@KillaCommie4Mommy I have strong libertarian sympathies and detest political coercion. Do you believe the government should intervene? I believe only those who commit violent crimes and property crimes should be in prison. Personally, I believe feminism is a much greater threat than homosexuality. The overwhelming majority of the population are feminists, but only a small minority are homosexuals. The government promotes feminism through indoctrination and economic warfare.
UltraConservative298 2 months ago
Only a strong ideologies like Nazism or Paganism can defeat what we face, but to each his own.
bmays002 2 months ago
Not exactly sure what to think...
return135 2 months ago
As a subscriber to you and supporter of yours I have to say that I am disappointed by your, as other people already pointed out, reactionary response in this video. As a National Socialist I know we won't agree on every subject but to imply that because of the Nazis, the world is in the state it is in today? Not only is that incorrect but it reeks of main steam politically correct nonsense. EuropeanWatchman's personal views are just that.
ssszar 2 months ago
@ssszar It's hypothetical, but I believe that whites would be relatively healthy psychologically and philosophically, and cultural Marxism would be relatively powerless or non-existent, if it weren't for the Nazis and the African slave trade.
LibertarianRealist 2 months ago
@LibertarianRealist I agree
graaaaaagh 2 months ago
@LibertarianRealist I'd also add to that list the white southerners that played right into the hands of civil rights protesters. By initiating violence on the protesters (see the freedom riders), they provided the necessary propaganda that led to a shift in values that favored self-esteem as more important than the notion of property rights.
blakstar101 2 months ago
@LibertarianRealist I would have to disagree. I would argue that because of the fact that National Socialist Germany was defeated, we now have marxism thriving in the west. Lets not forget that after the war, our government turned half of Europe over to "the gallant soviets" Germany and the the rest of the axis powers in ww2 were simply defending Europe. I would also argue against your notion that because of the Nazis, whites are now psychologically and philosophically unhealthy.
ssszar 2 months ago 2
@ssszar
LibetarianRealist has got it all wrong on Nazism which is ashame. If Hitler had won, the history books would have made out Britain and the Allied forces as the monsters who committed atrocities that were anti-white.
ProlifeVeganAryan 2 months ago 2
@LibertarianRealist "Nazism" as you so ignorantly put was a reaction to the cultural Marxism already prevalent in the Weimar Republic at the time. I've thought this for a long time, Libertarian Realist. You are a profoundly confused man.
OldSchopenhauer 2 months ago 3
@LibertarianRealist We need to just look at history as history and acknowledge every races right to exist. History should never be applied to today 1) because it is incredibly complex and we cannot get into every person's thought processes during different periods of time though diaries and personal writings help and 2) Because previous generations were just that previous generations.
Luigi84289 2 months ago
@LibertarianRealist You are being absolutely ridiculous. National Socialism has been the only real opposition to monetary and democratic enslavement. What you can blame Hitler for is losing the war. But he had done more than most anyone in history and if Germans are to survive he will eventually be regarded as a hero. What you can't blame him for is anti German war propaganda. It was already pretty bad when he started the opposition, god knows how much worse it would be now.
TinkerBellCurves 2 months ago 2
@LibertarianRealist
"if it weren't for the Nazis and the African slave trade."
1st If Black slaves hadn't been used then it would have been some other type of slave and there was no overall control over the TA slave trade anyway - it just emerged naturally over 4 centuries. Therefore inevitable.
2nd Nazism was an inevitable natural reaction to the rise of Judeo-Bolshevism in Europe and the massive Jewish backstabbing of Germany in WW1, over the acquisition of Palestine.
EuropeanWatchman 2 months ago
great video
natritious1 2 months ago
fuck fascism and all you stupid nazi scumbags
natritious1 2 months ago
this is stupid
VaiTomarN0Cu 2 months ago
This is the most vomit inducingly reactionairy video I have seen in along time. No matter how much you wrap your views up in cotten wool the left will always regard you as a nazi and a fascist. The mainstream media calls Patrick Buchannan a Fascist Nazi and even he wouldn't want to touch your views with a bargepole.
unsubbed. You give the left ammunition by making us look weak when you make bitch out videos like this. Jefferson impregnated teen black girls, so he is hardly a model for realists.
lostwisdom100 2 months ago
@lostwisdom100 "Jefferson impregnated teen black girls"
Maybe not. Urban legends aren't always true: monticello. org/site/plantation-and-slavery/thomas-jefferson-and-sally-hemings-brief-account
hitssquad 2 months ago
The idea of compulsory rape camps for White women being brought up poisons your viewership's ability to judge your ideas on their own merits, JUST like it obviously didn't help YOUR poisoned ability to judge National Socialism on its own merits.
TinkerBellCurves 2 months ago 7
Comment removed
mike1988123 2 months ago
@mike1988123 Walk through any major city and you will see that the statement you just posted is utter bullshit and the reverse is true.
lostwisdom100 2 months ago
But, um, most white women are dysgenic. They've been bred by welfare and Feminazism into retards. Asians > Whites.
ThisMachineKillsReds 2 months ago
Lol, EuropeanWatchman is a retard.
ThisMachineKillsReds 2 months ago