I used to think (or tell myself for comfort's sake) that maybe there was a possibilty of surviving a nuclear attack. The scene starting at 1:58 just taught me otherwise. It's like some kinda "disappearing tank trick".
hey projekt pete you are a fucktard the russians only got about 3 thousand nukes on the us we're right up there with them unlike any other country which is far as fuck away so yeah the us and russia are the most powerful when it comes to nukes and who knows what the fuck we got now the biggest nuke was detonated in 1961 equal to 57 million tons of tnt so yeah your dumb :] lol
Man it would be a chain of nuclear warheads if one country shot at the other. There would be no country that is "alive". Goddesslush is right when saying "no one can win a nuclear war".
You forget no one can win a nuclear war there will always be a way to counter regardless of destruction does not matter who goes first. Not to mention the amount fall out which will ultimately claim both nations or whoever decides to go into a nuclear conflict.. I dont think you understand the potential of these weapons both in the short term or long term. You should read into M.A.D.
And USA would counter no one can win a nuclear war. You can do more damage with smaller warheads in a blanket effect pattern. Id be surprised with the USSR big is not always better. USA has taken the time to maintain there warheads. No one can win a nuclear war.
in france we have just 350 thermonuclear warhead with just 150 Ktones yeld ...
i think it's broadly sufficient with our M45 missile in our SSBM (in 2010 M51 for our new Next generation submarine triomphant class, 8000 km range, precision : 100 m !) to make abandon all country who want strike france we a high yeld nuclear weapon ...
why to have thousands of fusion bombs, while 10 are enough, so definitely put to put has knees the ennemi and to make him regret bitterly ?
As an example. if 4 140kt warheads detonate in a circle around an area they would cover much more damage alone than a single 1 megaton yield this because of the shock wave and thermal flash from all four nukes if done in air burst format there would be less full out which means the area could be inhabited after. A lot of people see nuclear test footage and think that's what they drop. which is not the case. Smaller is better than in regard to Nukes. Russia made nice test footage yes.that is all
missile with 6 or 10 150 Kilotonnes warhead is the french choice for her nuclear dissuasion ... with already defined trajectories as you represent it, to knock in a circle around a point as though which was the zero ground but all warhead strike at 7-8 km of this point ...
a weapon of 150 Kt destroying with effectiveness to about 7-8 km ...
its increible see a thing like that... just one bomb could kill millions of ppl... its interesting listen the anthem of the Soviet Union who talks about friendship, labor, pride, etc and see nuclear bombs being detonated... but of course is a necessary evil, Soviet Union couldn't being w/o that bombs cuz if that happened USA havent been "controlated" all that years..
Have you people no mind.The Russians litearly can get on a boat with ex-commandos get a AK-47 and they go and kill pirates.THATS why I live in Moscov.
fuck the human being for destroying anything .... if u sell one of these things u can save milions of lives but noooo only want some power there olready trying to develop anti mater bombs where u pay millions of dollar/euros of taxes for and only bein super destructive god gotta love the human kind ....
imagine if those scientists in america in late 1940's didnt choose to share the secret? the US would have killed billions of people who didnt obey them. Americans should stop worrying about policing the world and fix they inter problems like the clooked FDA, CIA and eliminate FEDERAL RESERVE.
ummm...lol-no...the russians would rape the british, and any damage the US would do to russia the russians would send back...beleive me. russians "couldn't do shit to shit"? obviously you know jack-shit. bro, they have like nearly 60 THOUSAND nukes...double what the US has and god knows how many times what the UK has. the fuck's wrong with you..? the russians are the most powerful country on earth when it comes to nukes...
Man they would not use nukes in a war, unless they were despret and nearly lost the war or somthing it's just not worth it cause if you send a nuke u get one back and everyone would just die. Nuke's are just to show the power of the country trying to scare other countries and just useless in war...
all i'm saying is that russia is the boss when it comes nuclear weapons. 50 yrs ago the tsar bomb was scaled back to half its might due to its massive case size (and fallout). but computers at one time took up an entire room...now they are pocket sized. do you think for a minute that bomb is still as big in size/mass today as it was 50 yrs ago? 10-15 missiles loaded with 12 (full powered) tsar warheads each...just take that in for a sec. that my fiend, is power... beyond imagination....
Not boss at all. You seem to think bigger is better it really is not when you look at the bigger picture when it comes to using land the clue also comes from hiroshima. Why do you think they were so keen to study the aftermath.
Apparently. USA has spent more study to the technology of nuclear weapons in wiping out continents. just because russia has more nuclear weapons does not make it better if anything USA if a pre emptive strike happened could take Moscow with low yield war heads and still allow the land to be habitable. Where as you lot just hope big payloads will do the the trick due to your bad accuracy.
"Where as you lot just hope big payloads will do the the trick due to your bad accuracy."
I'm Canadian...retard.. biggest bombs we have are only slightly more powerful than hand grenades.
Like it or not, the Russians still have a more impressive arsenal than the US does. The US delivery systems have a (slightly) higher precision rate, but the bombs pale in comparison in terms of yield. Pull your head out of your ass...the US isn't the top dog for nukes.
So what if your Canadian? That has nothing to do with it. And also if you knew more about the subject you would know they never use large nuclear payloads anymore! most of you idiots get it confused with test footage big difference! America by far still has more more nukes they don't need big nukes as they can blanket entire area's which would create far more shock waves and fire storms. but with out so much fall out which what Russia's yields would do due to the guidance systems. Go figure!
Spot on. The Russians have too big of a country and an extremely low population density, the USA would be screwed much more just big they have a much higher population density.
Thats chuck norris's grenade
HUSoldierVEVO 4 months ago
2:10 tsar bombe
sprengmeister00 5 months ago
Who is that man sitting next to one of the "Red Bombs" at 2:25? It isn't Andrei Sakharov, is it? Thank you. Spasibo. :)
Nguli34689 7 months ago
communism is evil
MichaeljacksonAFG 1 year ago
@MichaeljacksonAFG Your evil. I doubt you even have anything to back you up to prove it is any more evil than anything else.
xGODZILLAFIREFOXx 5 months ago
I used to think (or tell myself for comfort's sake) that maybe there was a possibilty of surviving a nuclear attack. The scene starting at 1:58 just taught me otherwise. It's like some kinda "disappearing tank trick".
schauspieler23 1 year ago
hey projekt pete you are a fucktard the russians only got about 3 thousand nukes on the us we're right up there with them unlike any other country which is far as fuck away so yeah the us and russia are the most powerful when it comes to nukes and who knows what the fuck we got now the biggest nuke was detonated in 1961 equal to 57 million tons of tnt so yeah your dumb :] lol
breakinghabitx 1 year ago
Jack Bauer seen this?
luiscarloseiras 1 year ago
all hail russia, the best, smartest and the strongest country in the world.
arthuraf10ds 1 year ago 3
RUSSIA UP!!!
majabjekovic 1 year ago
That's why you should not piss of Chuck Norris.
Ermundos 1 year ago 9
Are you for real fucktard?
jfrockon 1 year ago
Man it would be a chain of nuclear warheads if one country shot at the other. There would be no country that is "alive". Goddesslush is right when saying "no one can win a nuclear war".
ASSASSINgamer 2 years ago
hehehe... it all works out okay in the end.
goddesslush 2 years ago
I dont really care. Your the one who seemed to have the issue originally. I'm glad you can learn.
goddesslush 2 years ago
You forget no one can win a nuclear war there will always be a way to counter regardless of destruction does not matter who goes first. Not to mention the amount fall out which will ultimately claim both nations or whoever decides to go into a nuclear conflict.. I dont think you understand the potential of these weapons both in the short term or long term. You should read into M.A.D.
goddesslush 2 years ago
And USA would counter no one can win a nuclear war. You can do more damage with smaller warheads in a blanket effect pattern. Id be surprised with the USSR big is not always better. USA has taken the time to maintain there warheads. No one can win a nuclear war.
goddesslush 2 years ago
in france we have just 350 thermonuclear warhead with just 150 Ktones yeld ...
i think it's broadly sufficient with our M45 missile in our SSBM (in 2010 M51 for our new Next generation submarine triomphant class, 8000 km range, precision : 100 m !) to make abandon all country who want strike france we a high yeld nuclear weapon ...
why to have thousands of fusion bombs, while 10 are enough, so definitely put to put has knees the ennemi and to make him regret bitterly ?
alpacks 2 years ago
As an example. if 4 140kt warheads detonate in a circle around an area they would cover much more damage alone than a single 1 megaton yield this because of the shock wave and thermal flash from all four nukes if done in air burst format there would be less full out which means the area could be inhabited after. A lot of people see nuclear test footage and think that's what they drop. which is not the case. Smaller is better than in regard to Nukes. Russia made nice test footage yes.that is all
goddesslush 2 years ago
@goddesslush
missile with 6 or 10 150 Kilotonnes warhead is the french choice for her nuclear dissuasion ... with already defined trajectories as you represent it, to knock in a circle around a point as though which was the zero ground but all warhead strike at 7-8 km of this point ...
a weapon of 150 Kt destroying with effectiveness to about 7-8 km ...
alpacks 2 years ago
malparidos...
malagarcha 2 years ago
isnt it retarded how the dude who posts this HAS to put red bomb in the title LOL jackass.
wankerman2001 2 years ago
JAckass should be your surname people like you make me sick.
goddesslush 2 years ago
ur the jackass
Elkartos 2 years ago
its increible see a thing like that... just one bomb could kill millions of ppl... its interesting listen the anthem of the Soviet Union who talks about friendship, labor, pride, etc and see nuclear bombs being detonated... but of course is a necessary evil, Soviet Union couldn't being w/o that bombs cuz if that happened USA havent been "controlated" all that years..
Ryaguas 2 years ago
Have you people no mind.The Russians litearly can get on a boat with ex-commandos get a AK-47 and they go and kill pirates.THATS why I live in Moscov.
MrFoxstyle 2 years ago
Not enough people set this kind of music to nuclear test footage.
enemyofbohemia 2 years ago
fuck the human being for destroying anything .... if u sell one of these things u can save milions of lives but noooo only want some power there olready trying to develop anti mater bombs where u pay millions of dollar/euros of taxes for and only bein super destructive god gotta love the human kind ....
daco145 3 years ago
imagine if those scientists in america in late 1940's didnt choose to share the secret? the US would have killed billions of people who didnt obey them. Americans should stop worrying about policing the world and fix they inter problems like the clooked FDA, CIA and eliminate FEDERAL RESERVE.
mfgunit 2 years ago
How big of a bomb do you need? when it is more damage than it is worth is the reason the cold war started.
dragonbat13 3 years ago
This shows what the russians can do to the world. I don't
know if it's bad or good.
xcheetohx25 3 years ago
fucking fags couldnt do shit to shit man the fucking english would wipe these bastards the usa would just fucking own them
summerpl0x 2 years ago
ummm...lol-no...the russians would rape the british, and any damage the US would do to russia the russians would send back...beleive me. russians "couldn't do shit to shit"? obviously you know jack-shit. bro, they have like nearly 60 THOUSAND nukes...double what the US has and god knows how many times what the UK has. the fuck's wrong with you..? the russians are the most powerful country on earth when it comes to nukes...
ProjektPete 2 years ago 15
Man they would not use nukes in a war, unless they were despret and nearly lost the war or somthing it's just not worth it cause if you send a nuke u get one back and everyone would just die. Nuke's are just to show the power of the country trying to scare other countries and just useless in war...
Jetlis 2 years ago
all i'm saying is that russia is the boss when it comes nuclear weapons. 50 yrs ago the tsar bomb was scaled back to half its might due to its massive case size (and fallout). but computers at one time took up an entire room...now they are pocket sized. do you think for a minute that bomb is still as big in size/mass today as it was 50 yrs ago? 10-15 missiles loaded with 12 (full powered) tsar warheads each...just take that in for a sec. that my fiend, is power... beyond imagination....
ProjektPete 2 years ago
Not boss at all. You seem to think bigger is better it really is not when you look at the bigger picture when it comes to using land the clue also comes from hiroshima. Why do you think they were so keen to study the aftermath.
goddesslush 2 years ago
Apparently. USA has spent more study to the technology of nuclear weapons in wiping out continents. just because russia has more nuclear weapons does not make it better if anything USA if a pre emptive strike happened could take Moscow with low yield war heads and still allow the land to be habitable. Where as you lot just hope big payloads will do the the trick due to your bad accuracy.
goddesslush 2 years ago
"Where as you lot just hope big payloads will do the the trick due to your bad accuracy."
I'm Canadian...retard.. biggest bombs we have are only slightly more powerful than hand grenades.
Like it or not, the Russians still have a more impressive arsenal than the US does. The US delivery systems have a (slightly) higher precision rate, but the bombs pale in comparison in terms of yield. Pull your head out of your ass...the US isn't the top dog for nukes.
Bigger bombs + more of them = Boss.
ProjektPete 2 years ago
So what if your Canadian? That has nothing to do with it. And also if you knew more about the subject you would know they never use large nuclear payloads anymore! most of you idiots get it confused with test footage big difference! America by far still has more more nukes they don't need big nukes as they can blanket entire area's which would create far more shock waves and fire storms. but with out so much fall out which what Russia's yields would do due to the guidance systems. Go figure!
goddesslush 2 years ago
@ProjektPete
Spot on. The Russians have too big of a country and an extremely low population density, the USA would be screwed much more just big they have a much higher population density.
DSHK45 1 year ago
@ProjektPete dude if it wouldnt matter cus everything would just get blown the fuck up lol there would be nothing left
MrOzzy33 1 year ago
@ProjektPete i love u
ultimatemusic2009 1 year ago
thx for postin great
shows the power of the soviets
MaskOfSorrow 3 years ago