I didn't ignore what you posted about the Bible, but you aren't really looking for answers are you? You just want to ridicule the Bible and Christians. A scoffer takes his joy in scoffing.
What was the sin that caused you to turn from God?
@The1Indignitary You said "I didn't ignore what you posted about the Bible, but you aren't really looking for answers are you? You just want to ridicule the Bible and Christians. A scoffer takes his joy in scoffing. What was the sin that caused you to turn from God?"
I stumbled upon this comment by accident since you didn't address it to me.
YOU MOST CERTAINLY DID IGNORE WHAT I POSTED...THE TRUTH IS CLEAR.
You are free to remain in the land of blissful ignorance...I couldn't care less.
Tell me why do people make movies like this it makes no sense to hate so why do it instead making a video and making fun how about you call them up and talk to them
To believe that the whole diversity of life, plants and animals living and extinct descend from a common ancestor, basically a single cell organism a stupidity...
YES, IT IS...Is that what evolution teaches? yes...most evolutionist don´t even know it? the word evolution is used in so many different context? yes...
Does any scientist can define evolution? NOOOOOOO....jejejejejejeje...no te esponges, estoy satirisando tu video...bye
@realhomosapiens Why does rejection of evolution go hand in hand with a rejection of grammar, punctuation and spelling?. You claim to know more that the scientific community but you can't seem to string together a coherent sentence. What exactly is "Does any scientist can define evolution?" meant to mean? I'm too accustomed to people writing in a correct manner to understand you.
Why do people promoting a religion try to portray nonreligious ideas as religious? If they were able to show that evolution was a religion, how is that suppose to persuade people to join their religion? At that point, it becomes a question of which religion you accept as true, if any. Even if they were to show that evolution is untrue, it doesn't mean their religion is correct. The only way somebody could by into any of this is if they already accepted their conclusions before hand.
Bible thumbing moron alert! Argumentation for the existence of magic from the writings of bronze age men? If this was a court of law the defense would say "objection hearsay" and the judge would warn the lawyer not to use that argument again or be fined for defying the court...
In fact, I would love to see someone stand up in church and yell "Objection, hearsay!" when the preacher tells us to believe or burn in hell...
You receive Jesus Christ by receiving the truth of the gospel. Read the following scripture:
1 Corinthians 15: 2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain.
3For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; 4And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
@The1Indignitary You said "You receive Jesus Christ by receiving the truth of the gospel."
Would that include stoning your unruly children to death? Or perhaps killing anyone who works on the sabbath? Would the truth include men living in whale bellies for three days or women turning into piles of salt?
Sounds like "the truth of the gospel" is an oxymoron....sort of like 'jumbo shrimp'.
@CynicalSkeptic1 Why are you so contrary? You are obviously aware that Jesus Christ condemned those who would have stoned those for breaking the Mosaic law.
As concerning the story of Jonah, living inside the belly of a fish for three days; you should read the book of Jonah again. As he was not alive, he was dead and in hell while his body was inside the fish. Jonah describes the experience very explicitly.
@CynicalSkeptic1 In Mathew 12:40, Jesus Christ likens his own death to that of Jonah's. He like Jonah was dead for 3 days, descended in to hell and rose from the dead.
@The1Indignitary You actually attempt to euphemistically interpret stoning your unruly children to death? You are a sick individual. As I said before, the Bible states that you should murder anyone working on the sabbath. So obviously you should take an AK-47 down to Home Depot next Sunday (Since this Sunday is x-mas and no one is working).
There is no reason to place any merit on a 2,000 year old text which indicates that leprosy cleansing results from being "sprinkled with bird's blood".
@The1Indignitary The Bible is a book about bronze-age myths. It is a text from mankind's infancy and attempts to explain things with supernatural events; many of which we have disproven with science. Evolution is a fact of life and it completely contradicts the creation fable. Since creation didn't actually take place then there was no 'original sin' and no need for Yahweh/Jesus to sacrifice himself to himself. The foundation of Christianity disintegrates.
@The1Indignitary Matthew 12: 40 "For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of a huge fish..."
For the sake of argument, let's just assume that your interpretation of the story is correct. If Jonah was also resurrected from the dead...then this is supposed to add validity to the fable? It would appear that resurrections are a rather common occurrence in the Bible.
@CynicalSkeptic1 Indeed it is. In fact, resurrection is a common theme in the Bible. Jesus Christ said about himself the following; in John 5:26For as the Father hath life in himself; so hath he given to the Son to have life in himself;27And hath given him authority to execute judgment also, because he is the Son of man.
28Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice,29And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.
@The1Indignitary You said "In fact, resurrection is a common theme in the Bible."
Funny, but there is no evidence of resurrections ever taking place. This shouldn't be surprizing since there are no talking donkeys and women aren't made from ribs.
Since you completely ignored everything else I posted...allow me to exhibit some other juicy tidbits from your Bible.
@CynicalSkeptic1 I will Romans1:18 18For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;
God has already put it in your heart to believe the gospel. Don't reject His grace or you will wake up in hell one day.
@The1Indignitary Sir, you said ABSOLUTELY NOTHING concerning what I stated about Bible content.
I don't need your threats of eternal damnation to force me to believe in an entity which doesn't appear to exist. Even if this god did exist...he would be one of the most malevolent characters in all of history.
We BOTH disbelieve in the vast majority of the thousands of gods invented by mankind throughout the ages...I simply add your god to the very very very long list that we BOTH agree upon.
@CynicalSkeptic1 I am making no threats. The Bible and Jesus Christ promise that if you reject Christ, you WILL go to Hell.
John 3:36 He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.
@The1Indignitary I don't care where the threat originated from...you stated that if I don't believe in your particular god (as opposed to believing in thousands of others) then I am to suffer an horrendous punishment. Obviously you agree with your god's punishment or you wouldn't be in your particular religion. According to biblical "justice", a mass murderer can repent and accept Jesus on his deathbed...he goes to heaven. Anyone other than a Christian who leads a benevolent life...goes to hell.
@The1Indignitary To be honest, it SPEAKS VOLUMES that you completely ignored everything I posted about what is contained in your Bible.
If you are just going to ignore the majority of the information (directly from your Bible) then what is the purpose in continuing this debate?
You obviously feel more comfortable ignoring the distasteful portions of your holy book. I was a Christian for 20 years....I grew tired of ignoring half of the Bible in a vain attempt for it to appear true.
@The1Indignitary That servant who knows his master’s will and does not get ready or does not do what his master wants will be beaten with many blows. (Luke 12:47) (Beating your slaves)
If a man beats his male or female slave with a rod and the slave dies as a direct result, he must be punished, but he is not to be punished if the slave gets up after a day or two, since the slave is his property.” (Exodus 21:20-21) (Beating and killing your slaves)
@The1Indignitary Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves. Numbers 31:17-18 (Condoning rape of virgins)
But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. 1 Timothy 2:11-12 (Telling women to shut-up)
@The1Indignitary If a man happens to meet a virgin who is not pledged to be married and rapes her and they are both discovered, he shall pay the girl’s father fifty shekels of silver. He must marry the girl, for he has violated her. (Deuteronomy 22:28-29) (Forcing a rape victim to marry rapist)
“Anyone who curses his father or mother must be put to death.” (Jesus speaking) (Matthew 15:4)
Whoever does any work on the Sabbath day must be put to death. (Exodus 31:15) (More killing of course)
Romans 10:9That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. 10For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.
Choose to receive and trust Jesus Christ while you still can. You don't know if you will see tomorrow!
Jesus Christ made the following statement to Paul after His resurrection in the book of Acts 27:18
To open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me.
This fool is why other countries laugh at us. What a willfully ignorant moron. Go and love your god! You don't need to resort to this anti-thought, anti-progress nonsense!
It's all scientific illusion, These 'experts' are deceiving themselves and those who listen to them. 'Scientists' actually claim that the stars are not in the sky. Really, that is what they are saying.
Jesus Christ said in John 15;13
Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.
WTF are you talking about? You actually beleive in the idiocy that is a flat earth that remains motionless and sits atop four pillars, covered by a crystal dome? We proved that wrong in Galileo's day, and we even sent people to the moon and collected actual moon rocks as well. Meteors also disprove your nonsense since many fall to Earth every day.
@The1Indignitary the stars AREN'T IN the sky, what are you talking about?!!? The stars aren't just sitting up there waiting to be plucked down, have you ever been in an airplane? the pilot doesn't have to make course corrections to avoid hitting stars! Your argument is asinine at best and harmful to the world at worst.
Does Eric know he is a liar or is he really that stupid? I really want to know. I know that most americans are not educated enough to know why he is wrong or even what he is really talking about. But does he know he's a liar?
It never ceases to amaze me how the creationist crowd will attack evolution by making it more like their own position, ie. making it out to be a religion. Is geology a religion too? Is cosmology?
1.e+16 miles is 1 million light years. We have a problem here. A star 1000 times the size of the sun couldn't shine light that far to be visible to the naked eye.
@hdhale2 Scientists have no way of knowing their distances, as they cannot shine light that far or for that length of time. To measure a star's distance of say 10 million light years you would have to point the light 20 million years. It's absurd. Do the math, how many miles is a light year? Now multiply that by 100 million. That is a lie to prop up evolution. Don't let the devil deceive you, believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be saved.
@The1Indignitary Why don't you actually read up a bit to find out how astronomers actually measure the distance of the stars? What you have written has nothing to do with real scientific process. Look up paralax for starters. You can even do a model of paralax at home in your yard - if you do it carefully you can come within a centameter of measuring the right distances to objects in your yard. But this does assume you can do some high school level math
This guy is ridiculous... Please, please, please, don't use rationality to explain religion. Faith is the absence of rationality, evidence, or even to maintain falsities even though evidence disproves it.
But, I also believe that some scientific ideas (very few of them) are taken as faith... that there isn't enough information to support their ideas. Or in the church of global warming, when the evidence is cherry-picked to bring about the socialist changes they've wanted for years.
ATTENTION!!! LETS GET BRETTPPALMER MORE SUBS. Brettppalmer channel is about debunking creationism and biblical bullshit. He offers great quality videos on the topic. Please check out one of this videos NOW. Please REPOST this on other channels. He is so undersubscribed it’s crime against nature. If you have your own popular channel please give him a plug. LET HIM KNOW HOW YOU FOUND HIM.
Apparently Eric Hovind's definition of religion is anything which he doesn't bother to read up on or learn about (except his version of Christianity). I disagree (and hope everyone else does too).
Apparently, you need illogical thinking, belief in miracles, and trust in dogmatic statements to be religion. On those three points, I agree with him.
One might conjecture that Eric Hovind's definition of religion is anything which he doesn't bother to read up on or learn about (except his version of Christianity). I disagree (and hope everyone else does too).
Apparently, you need illogical thinking, belief in miracles, and trust in dogmatic statements to be religion. On those three points, I agree with him.
"I become very depressesd when I see Eric Hovind"
I actually become very cheerful, since no matter how stupid I sometimes behave, I will never be able to get to that level. Unless I get severe brain damage, that is.
hovind displays so many instances,types layers and dimensions of EPIC FAIL that he is creating is own fucking saga of FAIL.i mean...seriously?is it even humanly possible to be wrong that many times in a minute?because i am staring to wonder If he is even human.i think even a creationist would be embarrassed by watching hovind talk.he crossed a point where instead of just being plain wrong in the the massive scale of FAIL at the end its just sad to watch...poor hovind.not fit for this world......
Pay your taxes Eric! if theres anything you learn from your father it's that...oh,and don't lie for jesus,and don't pretend to have a doctorate,and shut the fuck up
One last time- the laws of thermodynamics are high shcool senior level physics. Bioligists with PhDs have *been through* high school physics, in fact some of them have degrees in engineering besides biology. If they try to publish a paper which ignore these basic principals they'd get laughed at by their peers.
BIOLOGISTS UNDERSTAND thermodynamics. CREATIONISTS DON'T Eric, read one of the hundreds of science text your father claims to have, and stop LYING about science you don't understand.
They just don't understand the difference between an open and closed system, or the fact that there can be localized negative entropy even if the entire system is overall progressing towards increased entropy.
I see now, it's called Search for ExtraTerrestrial Intelligence.........................and how will they "know" it's intelligent life and not just some natural transmission or signal?
@ozredneck22 By examining radio waves, and comparing it known natural phenomena. Why don't you look up the SETI website?. And what does this have to do with Intelligent design ?.
You mean they research the difference between natural phenomena and intelligently designed signals, even though they cannot see, test or know the initiator of the intelligence they still know by the signature of the message. The message would contain specified complexity not just "order".
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The first SETI investigators made the mistake of believing quasars were intelligent signals, but these were order not like crystal assembly or snow flakes. SETI investigators are searching for intelligent design but they don't believe it exists.
@ozredneck22 They are searching for Intelligent life not Intelligent design. there is a difference but you don't want to accept it. The example you specify is a great example of science re-adjusting its findings as new evidence comes in.
@ozredneck22 OK here it is nice and slow for you. Intelligent design, the bastardised version of creation that says "certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection." and has not passed any scientific test. SETI searches for intelligent life, not intelligent design. Reason SETI does not accept ID is because it is not science.
@ozredneck22 The analogy with SETI is not quite right- SETI is looking for intellegence, but it is based on our own existance as an example. We know we exist on this planet, so we are looking for other things like us. With ID, we are not looking for something like us, or something like anything that we know exists at all.
@ozredneck22 they don't believe it exists? Carl Sagan always loved to talk about the search for extra terrestrial life and he was part of SETI. He even had a video on the Drake Equation
@ozredneck22 Nope the research the difference between natural radiations and artificial ones these radiations would be easy to recognize as artificial due to their repetitive nature and narrow bandwidths. Hows does this relate to the non-science that is Intelligent Design ?.
i have been on youtube for a while now. and this by far is THE BEST video I have seen on here -- i have never laughed so hard in a long time. I love Picard.
"We"? you have seen them? measured them? I don't think there's any way to tell how far they are away, not saying they aren't out that far but the trig and other measuring systems are inaccurate and incapable of proving them self's. By the way hdale2 , another correction , the speed of light is not a constant (not always the same speed) its been proven in the labs ;)
You are so full of shit, Turbo. I personally haven't measured them, but many thousands of astronomers, astrophysicists, cosmologists and other scientists have, and I think it's safe to assume that your level of knowledge on the subject is vastly inferior. Also, the speed of light IS a constant, and has not been proven otherwise in any lab, you idiot.
It's very clear who has vastly inferior knowledge of the subject after that last fictional fact you stated lol before you pretend you have any idea what you are talking about why don't you do maybe a tiny tad of research , lol but yes evolutionists are always the first ones to name calling and flipping because it makes them mad when someone proves there lies wrong lol have a nice day ;D
You don't even know how to use a period to end a sentence or how to properly use the word "there", so before you go around challenging anyone's level of knowledge, you should at least go back to pre-school and get a basic command of English so you don't look like such an uneducated idiot.
Hey you put a comma in the wrong spot , and you forgot to use a comma after cosmologists. Lol this guy sent me a message telling me i had vastly inferior education because i put a ;D at the end of my sentence instead of a period lol why don't you go cry to Richard Dawkins about this , he would tell you to keep your ignorant mouth shut. Stupid things like that are first signs your loosing an agrument lol....
I wonder if the guy in the video would care to explain, if the Universe is really 10,000 or so years old, how we can see stars, galaxies and such that are millions of light years away.
I mean, we're talking about the speed of light here...or are we to believe that the speed of light was somehow changed by the Great Flood?
Interesting that the first recorded miracle Jesus did was to make wine from water...and not NEW wine, but AGED wine, i.e., wine that was functionally superior for it's purpose.
@hdhale2 I have heard this argument many times but we currently have the technology to accurately measure about 70 light years. Even if the stars are great distances apart, this does not tell us what the age of the earth is. I know you are not a Bible believer but maybe you can provide us a definition for "streched out the heavens" Isaiah 44:24 - Thus says the LORD, your Redeemer, who formed you from the womb: "I am the LORD, who made all things, who stretched out the heavens alone
Actually I would have to say that Eric raises some good questions. Its a little like listening to an intro philosophy class; but still. How can we be sure we figured it out? Throughout history people have thought they had it all figured out and than had to throw away their theory when some inconvienant evidence surfaced. Than the scramble was one to construct a new one, we would have to be foolish to think we have it all figured out now
Mr. hovind shows signs of having never taken a 4th grade science class. He classifies the theories of scientific fields that have nothing to do with biological evolution along with the theory of evolution, things like the big bang and abiogenesis. Besides, we are at a level of understanding at our current development where the question isn't "is this explanation right?" but "what more can we discover?". Almost all of the explanations we are searching for right now pertain to the very small.
@equinesport I would say eric hovind raises no good points. Nothing is 100% proven in science, as evidence comes in theories are re-visited and adjusted likewise. We do not have it all figured out, is why scientists still have jobs.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
wow what a dum video ken ham and kent hovind get along fine their no problem with them. Let me ask you all a question have you ever study at all evilution? Or Listen to what creationist have to say and what evidence they have?
Creationists don't have any evidence. They don't even have an hypothesis to present, they just have an idea based on speculations. They think that because every life form we know and see today is complex, it must have been created. That is not evidence, that is simple speculation. And they try to attack evolution with no succes to justify their idea. Let's get this once and for all: even if evolution was wrong, wich is not, that does not represent a proof for creationism.
Eric Hovind is one of the biggest douche's of all time. Like father like son I guess.
brmadman4455 3 weeks ago
Eric Hovind is an escaped member of the Borg.
TheDarkLordLucifer 3 weeks ago
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!! xD omg he is stupid. :D
ReStOrEdLiFe88 3 weeks ago
I didn't ignore what you posted about the Bible, but you aren't really looking for answers are you? You just want to ridicule the Bible and Christians. A scoffer takes his joy in scoffing.
What was the sin that caused you to turn from God?
The1Indignitary 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@The1Indignitary You said "I didn't ignore what you posted about the Bible, but you aren't really looking for answers are you? You just want to ridicule the Bible and Christians. A scoffer takes his joy in scoffing. What was the sin that caused you to turn from God?"
I stumbled upon this comment by accident since you didn't address it to me.
YOU MOST CERTAINLY DID IGNORE WHAT I POSTED...THE TRUTH IS CLEAR.
You are free to remain in the land of blissful ignorance...I couldn't care less.
CynicalSkeptic1 3 weeks ago
Hahaha laughed my ass off :D This is my intro to Hovind, this was the first search result xD
bukifuriku 1 month ago
Just a little criticism, I think you used the Picard clip a little to much. Tone it down a bit, repetition can be overdone.
Enlightenedopinion92 2 months ago
Tell me why do people make movies like this it makes no sense to hate so why do it instead making a video and making fun how about you call them up and talk to them
grimreaperteam 2 months ago
@grimreaperteam Punctuation , Learn it.
ZuluFightrunner 2 months ago 2
@ZuluFightrunner
To believe that the whole diversity of life, plants and animals living and extinct descend from a common ancestor, basically a single cell organism a stupidity...
YES, IT IS...Is that what evolution teaches? yes...most evolutionist don´t even know it? the word evolution is used in so many different context? yes...
Does any scientist can define evolution? NOOOOOOO....jejejejejejeje...no te esponges, estoy satirisando tu video...bye
realhomosapiens 1 month ago
@realhomosapiens Why does rejection of evolution go hand in hand with a rejection of grammar, punctuation and spelling?. You claim to know more that the scientific community but you can't seem to string together a coherent sentence. What exactly is "Does any scientist can define evolution?" meant to mean? I'm too accustomed to people writing in a correct manner to understand you.
ZuluFightrunner 1 month ago 2
Why do people promoting a religion try to portray nonreligious ideas as religious? If they were able to show that evolution was a religion, how is that suppose to persuade people to join their religion? At that point, it becomes a question of which religion you accept as true, if any. Even if they were to show that evolution is untrue, it doesn't mean their religion is correct. The only way somebody could by into any of this is if they already accepted their conclusions before hand.
sacredbunny246 2 months ago
Bible thumbing moron alert! Argumentation for the existence of magic from the writings of bronze age men? If this was a court of law the defense would say "objection hearsay" and the judge would warn the lawyer not to use that argument again or be fined for defying the court...
In fact, I would love to see someone stand up in church and yell "Objection, hearsay!" when the preacher tells us to believe or burn in hell...
Hopefulfilment 2 months ago
This video needs more double facepalm.
morgothic420 2 months ago
i agree with Picard, lol
cherryhollowboy 2 months ago
You receive Jesus Christ by receiving the truth of the gospel. Read the following scripture:
1 Corinthians 15: 2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain.
3For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; 4And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
The1Indignitary 2 months ago
@The1Indignitary So read an old book and I will receive a cosmic zombie?
ZuluFightrunner 2 months ago 2
@ZuluFightrunner: Receive Jesus Christ and you will receive an unlimited supply of weed.
VampyricalCurse 3 weeks ago
@ZuluFightrunner Watch G1 transformer and Accept Optimus Prime into your heart. My fiction is newer :P
ebilly99 2 weeks ago
@The1Indignitary You said "You receive Jesus Christ by receiving the truth of the gospel."
Would that include stoning your unruly children to death? Or perhaps killing anyone who works on the sabbath? Would the truth include men living in whale bellies for three days or women turning into piles of salt?
Sounds like "the truth of the gospel" is an oxymoron....sort of like 'jumbo shrimp'.
CynicalSkeptic1 1 month ago
@CynicalSkeptic1 Why are you so contrary? You are obviously aware that Jesus Christ condemned those who would have stoned those for breaking the Mosaic law.
As concerning the story of Jonah, living inside the belly of a fish for three days; you should read the book of Jonah again. As he was not alive, he was dead and in hell while his body was inside the fish. Jonah describes the experience very explicitly.
The1Indignitary 1 month ago
@CynicalSkeptic1 In Mathew 12:40, Jesus Christ likens his own death to that of Jonah's. He like Jonah was dead for 3 days, descended in to hell and rose from the dead.
The1Indignitary 1 month ago
@CynicalSkeptic1 Did you know that the book of Romans says in chapter 5 that salvation is a "free gift" 3 times?
And it says in Romans 6:23 "For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
God has already given you the free gift of salvation, you don't even have to ask for it. But YOU must make the decision to accept or reject it.
The1Indignitary 1 month ago
@The1Indignitary You actually attempt to euphemistically interpret stoning your unruly children to death? You are a sick individual. As I said before, the Bible states that you should murder anyone working on the sabbath. So obviously you should take an AK-47 down to Home Depot next Sunday (Since this Sunday is x-mas and no one is working).
There is no reason to place any merit on a 2,000 year old text which indicates that leprosy cleansing results from being "sprinkled with bird's blood".
CynicalSkeptic1 1 month ago
@The1Indignitary The Bible is a book about bronze-age myths. It is a text from mankind's infancy and attempts to explain things with supernatural events; many of which we have disproven with science. Evolution is a fact of life and it completely contradicts the creation fable. Since creation didn't actually take place then there was no 'original sin' and no need for Yahweh/Jesus to sacrifice himself to himself. The foundation of Christianity disintegrates.
CynicalSkeptic1 1 month ago
@The1Indignitary Matthew 12: 40 "For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of a huge fish..."
For the sake of argument, let's just assume that your interpretation of the story is correct. If Jonah was also resurrected from the dead...then this is supposed to add validity to the fable? It would appear that resurrections are a rather common occurrence in the Bible.
CynicalSkeptic1 1 month ago
@CynicalSkeptic1 Indeed it is. In fact, resurrection is a common theme in the Bible. Jesus Christ said about himself the following; in John 5:26For as the Father hath life in himself; so hath he given to the Son to have life in himself;27And hath given him authority to execute judgment also, because he is the Son of man.
The1Indignitary 1 month ago
28Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice,29And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.
The1Indignitary 1 month ago
@The1Indignitary You said "In fact, resurrection is a common theme in the Bible."
Funny, but there is no evidence of resurrections ever taking place. This shouldn't be surprizing since there are no talking donkeys and women aren't made from ribs.
Since you completely ignored everything else I posted...allow me to exhibit some other juicy tidbits from your Bible.
CynicalSkeptic1 1 month ago
@CynicalSkeptic1 I will Romans1:18 18For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;
God has already put it in your heart to believe the gospel. Don't reject His grace or you will wake up in hell one day.
The1Indignitary 1 month ago
@The1Indignitary Sir, you said ABSOLUTELY NOTHING concerning what I stated about Bible content.
I don't need your threats of eternal damnation to force me to believe in an entity which doesn't appear to exist. Even if this god did exist...he would be one of the most malevolent characters in all of history.
We BOTH disbelieve in the vast majority of the thousands of gods invented by mankind throughout the ages...I simply add your god to the very very very long list that we BOTH agree upon.
CynicalSkeptic1 1 month ago
@CynicalSkeptic1 I am making no threats. The Bible and Jesus Christ promise that if you reject Christ, you WILL go to Hell.
John 3:36 He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.
The1Indignitary 1 month ago
@The1Indignitary I don't care where the threat originated from...you stated that if I don't believe in your particular god (as opposed to believing in thousands of others) then I am to suffer an horrendous punishment. Obviously you agree with your god's punishment or you wouldn't be in your particular religion. According to biblical "justice", a mass murderer can repent and accept Jesus on his deathbed...he goes to heaven. Anyone other than a Christian who leads a benevolent life...goes to hell.
CynicalSkeptic1 1 month ago
@The1Indignitary To be honest, it SPEAKS VOLUMES that you completely ignored everything I posted about what is contained in your Bible.
If you are just going to ignore the majority of the information (directly from your Bible) then what is the purpose in continuing this debate?
You obviously feel more comfortable ignoring the distasteful portions of your holy book. I was a Christian for 20 years....I grew tired of ignoring half of the Bible in a vain attempt for it to appear true.
CynicalSkeptic1 1 month ago
@The1Indignitary That servant who knows his master’s will and does not get ready or does not do what his master wants will be beaten with many blows. (Luke 12:47) (Beating your slaves)
If a man beats his male or female slave with a rod and the slave dies as a direct result, he must be punished, but he is not to be punished if the slave gets up after a day or two, since the slave is his property.” (Exodus 21:20-21) (Beating and killing your slaves)
CynicalSkeptic1 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@The1Indignitary Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves. Numbers 31:17-18 (Condoning rape of virgins)
But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. 1 Timothy 2:11-12 (Telling women to shut-up)
CynicalSkeptic1 1 month ago
@The1Indignitary If a man happens to meet a virgin who is not pledged to be married and rapes her and they are both discovered, he shall pay the girl’s father fifty shekels of silver. He must marry the girl, for he has violated her. (Deuteronomy 22:28-29) (Forcing a rape victim to marry rapist)
“Anyone who curses his father or mother must be put to death.” (Jesus speaking) (Matthew 15:4)
Whoever does any work on the Sabbath day must be put to death. (Exodus 31:15) (More killing of course)
CynicalSkeptic1 1 month ago
@The1Indignitary So, as I said before, you must stone your unruly children to death and you MUST KILL EVERYONE WHO WORKS ON THE SABBATH.
Get to work, you have a lot of killing to do as a good Christian.
CynicalSkeptic1 1 month ago
God's plan of salvation is easy to understand.
Romans 10:9That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. 10For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.
Choose to receive and trust Jesus Christ while you still can. You don't know if you will see tomorrow!
The1Indignitary 2 months ago
@The1Indignitary How do I receive Jesus ? Does he come in the mail ?
ZuluFightrunner 2 months ago
Jesus Christ made the following statement to Paul after His resurrection in the book of Acts 27:18
To open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me.
The1Indignitary 2 months ago
@The1Indignitary Star Trek V : "What does god need with a star ship?"
ZuluFightrunner 2 months ago
I thought I would get tired of this, but it just got funnier and funnier.
ReThinkingTheism 6 months ago 2
This fool is why other countries laugh at us. What a willfully ignorant moron. Go and love your god! You don't need to resort to this anti-thought, anti-progress nonsense!
Helpmeknowthings 6 months ago
I'm a creationist but still I have to laugh! XD
BeyondtheChaos1 7 months ago
i stopped watching at the third facepalm. everybody got the joke. no one is laughing anymore. just know when to stop
guilhermesou0 8 months ago
@guilhermesou0 No.
ZuluFightrunner 2 months ago
so that`s why he lost his hair
gottbutter 8 months ago 5
Picard definitely won.
Jayoung1000 8 months ago
...dude, Picard does a little *sigh* at the end of his bit... to funny!
piopob 9 months ago
It's all scientific illusion, These 'experts' are deceiving themselves and those who listen to them. 'Scientists' actually claim that the stars are not in the sky. Really, that is what they are saying.
Jesus Christ said in John 15;13
Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.
The1Indignitary 9 months ago
@The1Indignitary
WTF are you talking about? You actually beleive in the idiocy that is a flat earth that remains motionless and sits atop four pillars, covered by a crystal dome? We proved that wrong in Galileo's day, and we even sent people to the moon and collected actual moon rocks as well. Meteors also disprove your nonsense since many fall to Earth every day.
NUTCASE71733 8 months ago
@The1Indignitary the stars AREN'T IN the sky, what are you talking about?!!? The stars aren't just sitting up there waiting to be plucked down, have you ever been in an airplane? the pilot doesn't have to make course corrections to avoid hitting stars! Your argument is asinine at best and harmful to the world at worst.
IamZren89 2 months ago
Does Eric know he is a liar or is he really that stupid? I really want to know. I know that most americans are not educated enough to know why he is wrong or even what he is really talking about. But does he know he's a liar?
ShalomYal 9 months ago
@ShalomYal oh yeah! i believe without a doubt he knows hes a liar.
SuperPimpjj 9 months ago
Hovind wins!!!
ndjarnag 9 months ago
It never ceases to amaze me how the creationist crowd will attack evolution by making it more like their own position, ie. making it out to be a religion. Is geology a religion too? Is cosmology?
jessemaurais 9 months ago
a bit over done, but I guess that's what you need to get the point across this clearly. I like it.
Hermy1138 9 months ago
This Eric guy is obviously a piss take.
lardrat 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
here for all who approve this c/p this in youtube search
What Every Creationist Must DENY
I think its Mozart in background very nice music =)
WeirdD1986 11 months ago
1.e+16 miles is 1 million light years. We have a problem here. A star 1000 times the size of the sun couldn't shine light that far to be visible to the naked eye.
The1Indignitary 11 months ago
@The1Indignitary What the hell are talking about? I understood not one part of that! I think your math is a little off.
sabbinac 6 months ago
@hdhale2 Scientists have no way of knowing their distances, as they cannot shine light that far or for that length of time. To measure a star's distance of say 10 million light years you would have to point the light 20 million years. It's absurd. Do the math, how many miles is a light year? Now multiply that by 100 million. That is a lie to prop up evolution. Don't let the devil deceive you, believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be saved.
The1Indignitary 11 months ago
@The1Indignitary Why don't you actually read up a bit to find out how astronomers actually measure the distance of the stars? What you have written has nothing to do with real scientific process. Look up paralax for starters. You can even do a model of paralax at home in your yard - if you do it carefully you can come within a centameter of measuring the right distances to objects in your yard. But this does assume you can do some high school level math
ShalomYal 9 months ago
This guy is ridiculous... Please, please, please, don't use rationality to explain religion. Faith is the absence of rationality, evidence, or even to maintain falsities even though evidence disproves it.
But, I also believe that some scientific ideas (very few of them) are taken as faith... that there isn't enough information to support their ideas. Or in the church of global warming, when the evidence is cherry-picked to bring about the socialist changes they've wanted for years.
instantpestering 11 months ago
I liked the part where Picard reacts with a facepalm.
Tijnvaassen 1 year ago 19
ATTENTION!!! LETS GET BRETTPPALMER MORE SUBS. Brettppalmer channel is about debunking creationism and biblical bullshit. He offers great quality videos on the topic. Please check out one of this videos NOW. Please REPOST this on other channels. He is so undersubscribed it’s crime against nature. If you have your own popular channel please give him a plug. LET HIM KNOW HOW YOU FOUND HIM.
TheGreatFoxKing 1 year ago
A bit repetitive, but we get the point ...
anarkoFred 1 year ago
This video sums it up perfectly.
WildcardHatesYou 1 year ago
Awesome....hahahaha
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
Apparently Eric Hovind's definition of religion is anything which he doesn't bother to read up on or learn about (except his version of Christianity). I disagree (and hope everyone else does too).
Apparently, you need illogical thinking, belief in miracles, and trust in dogmatic statements to be religion. On those three points, I agree with him.
drfoxcourt 1 year ago
One might conjecture that Eric Hovind's definition of religion is anything which he doesn't bother to read up on or learn about (except his version of Christianity). I disagree (and hope everyone else does too).
Apparently, you need illogical thinking, belief in miracles, and trust in dogmatic statements to be religion. On those three points, I agree with him.
drfoxcourt 1 year ago
Ha ha! After the first thirty seconds, I thought Hovind was talking about Christianity! XD
t34b34n 1 year ago
fuck I laughed SO HARD :D I should NOT watch stuff like this at work :D
AteistiSrbije 1 year ago
this is SO awesome :D great job man :D
AteistiSrbije 1 year ago
the two handed facepalm, when one just isn't enough!
123columbo123 1 year ago
Picard is so justified in sighing. The claims were almost too painful to hear lol. Set Phasers to stupid
TheQuiescentSquall 1 year ago
5/5 + 5
stratocaster539 1 year ago
LOL
luxfair 1 year ago
Well done. Really drives home how many completely absurd claims that this doofus can cram into a couple of minutes.
BrownGargantua 1 year ago
fucking genius!
1987kcp 1 year ago
Is that clip from the episode "Pen Pals"?
AsaphProject 1 year ago
I'm gonna punch him. Righht in the junk.
SouthernWhiteTrash 1 year ago
I become very depressesd when I see Eric Hovind.
Ekendil 1 year ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
@Ekendil
"I become very depressesd when I see Eric Hovind"
I actually become very cheerful, since no matter how stupid I sometimes behave, I will never be able to get to that level. Unless I get severe brain damage, that is.
MomoTheBellyDancer 1 year ago
What a turd!! :p
:p :p
petsoukos 1 year ago
His name should be Epic Failvind
celshader 1 year ago
Eric Hovind is a nutcase.
amorphousguy 1 year ago
hovind displays so many instances,types layers and dimensions of EPIC FAIL that he is creating is own fucking saga of FAIL.i mean...seriously?is it even humanly possible to be wrong that many times in a minute?because i am staring to wonder If he is even human.i think even a creationist would be embarrassed by watching hovind talk.he crossed a point where instead of just being plain wrong in the the massive scale of FAIL at the end its just sad to watch...poor hovind.not fit for this world......
geometrololi 1 year ago
I thought after ten seconds that this will get old real fast but it just doesnt! Brilliant. How many times in a minute can one person be wrong,wow
thebrassdubliner 1 year ago
I can answer one of erics questions: "who am I" - YOU ARE A TWAT!!
CigarStudLasVegas 1 year ago 2
Dumb video.......but I killed myself laughing. However, the stupidity of Eric Hovind is no laughing matter,
bcm010 1 year ago
PICARD DOUBLE HANDED FACEPALM FTW
MasterMacLeod 1 year ago
Very patient, cpt. Picard...
Wrath0fKhan 1 year ago
omg. that dude has balls the size of texas! none of that made any sense. bravo! no encore
twizelby 1 year ago
Brilliant!
usernameofnobody 1 year ago
i did the same thing picard did the very first comment hovind made. at which point i could not stop laughing the rest of the way! well done
hardtomemorize 1 year ago
it was just weird at first but by 1 minute i was really laughing
ThePresident001 1 year ago
Eric Hovind really is a moron...Picard ftw.
artwdog 1 year ago
I think Picard has a point ...
heyawhaw 2 years ago 2
At first I thought, "You can't just show the same clip of the Picard-Palm over and over!"
But lo and behold it got funnier everytime.
The Facepalm - When words aren't enough to describe the stupidity of what was just said.
GrandSupremeDaddyo 2 years ago
i would really like for a creationist to tell me that, i would laugh so hard in his fast and just walk away
FullTimeGunner 2 years ago
so many facepalms
I love Jean Luc Picard, he is the best Enterprise captain
debnadaviebna 2 years ago
"...and animals producing different kinds of animals."
First off *face-palm* is correct.
Second, what the hell is a "kind?"
1stLtDavis 2 years ago
Pay your taxes Eric! if theres anything you learn from your father it's that...oh,and don't lie for jesus,and don't pretend to have a doctorate,and shut the fuck up
ViralMessiah 2 years ago 2
One last time- the laws of thermodynamics are high shcool senior level physics. Bioligists with PhDs have *been through* high school physics, in fact some of them have degrees in engineering besides biology. If they try to publish a paper which ignore these basic principals they'd get laughed at by their peers.
BIOLOGISTS UNDERSTAND thermodynamics. CREATIONISTS DON'T Eric, read one of the hundreds of science text your father claims to have, and stop LYING about science you don't understand.
Humblestud 2 years ago 6
haha! "one last time" ... you think they get it this time! Don't hold your breath ... on the other hand don't give up either!
XD
heyawhaw 2 years ago
At what point does the theory of evolution claim to violate the laws of thermodynamics? Where does evolution claim to show where we are going?
Reasonable debate is fine, but arguments based on fabrications hold no weight.
FearlessSon 2 years ago
They just don't understand the difference between an open and closed system, or the fact that there can be localized negative entropy even if the entire system is overall progressing towards increased entropy.
SupremeChimp 2 years ago 3
Picard won clearly.
tomaselvis 2 years ago
facepalming :D
TheReasonWhyGuy 2 years ago
LOL
GPLeague 2 years ago
too many facepalm
jedimasterlaybourn 2 years ago
I love his slight grunt as he facepalms. :P
JakePelka 2 years ago
There is no evidence of intelligent life in outer space
Capt Picard puts hands on fore head
No aliens have been found
Capt Picard puts hands on fore head
SETI advocates dont believe in intelligent design
Capt Picard puts hands on fore head
But they are searching for it
Capt Picard puts hands on fore head
Capt Picard puts hands on fore head
Capt Picard puts hands on fore head
ozredneck22 2 years ago
Is there a point to this ?
ZuluFightrunner 2 years ago
"There is no evidence of intelligent life in outer space" - No evidence has yet been found because we have not explored the entire cosmos.
"No aliens have been found"- Correct again.
"SETI advocates dont believe in intelligent design" - Correct
"But they are searching for it" - What does ID have to do with cosmology ?.
ZuluFightrunner 2 years ago
@ozredneck22 there is no evidence of intelligent life in your brain
acceptjesusorburn 1 year ago
@acceptjesusorburn
You don't believe there is intelligent design on earth and you have no problem with SETI looking for intelligent design in outer space.
ozredneck22 1 year ago
@ozredneck22 SETI are not not "looking for intelligent design in outer space" the are looking for signs of intelligent life. Big difference.
ZuluFightrunner 1 year ago
@ZuluFightrunner
I see now, it's called Search for ExtraTerrestrial Intelligence.........................and how will they "know" it's intelligent life and not just some natural transmission or signal?
ozredneck22 1 year ago
@ozredneck22 By examining radio waves, and comparing it known natural phenomena. Why don't you look up the SETI website?. And what does this have to do with Intelligent design ?.
ZuluFightrunner 1 year ago
@ZuluFightrunner
How will they know it's not natural phenomena?
ozredneck22 1 year ago
@ozredneck22 Through research. What does this have to do with Intelligent design ?.
ZuluFightrunner 1 year ago
@ZuluFightrunner
You mean they research the difference between natural phenomena and intelligently designed signals, even though they cannot see, test or know the initiator of the intelligence they still know by the signature of the message. The message would contain specified complexity not just "order".
ozredneck22 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The first SETI investigators made the mistake of believing quasars were intelligent signals, but these were order not like crystal assembly or snow flakes. SETI investigators are searching for intelligent design but they don't believe it exists.
ozredneck22 1 year ago
@ozredneck22 They are searching for Intelligent life not Intelligent design. there is a difference but you don't want to accept it. The example you specify is a great example of science re-adjusting its findings as new evidence comes in.
ZuluFightrunner 1 year ago
@ozredneck22 OK here it is nice and slow for you. Intelligent design, the bastardised version of creation that says "certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection." and has not passed any scientific test. SETI searches for intelligent life, not intelligent design. Reason SETI does not accept ID is because it is not science.
ZuluFightrunner 1 year ago 4
@ozredneck22 The analogy with SETI is not quite right- SETI is looking for intellegence, but it is based on our own existance as an example. We know we exist on this planet, so we are looking for other things like us. With ID, we are not looking for something like us, or something like anything that we know exists at all.
ZuluFightrunner 1 year ago 12
@ozredneck22 they don't believe it exists? Carl Sagan always loved to talk about the search for extra terrestrial life and he was part of SETI. He even had a video on the Drake Equation
Richy15251 1 year ago
@ozredneck22 Nope the research the difference between natural radiations and artificial ones these radiations would be easy to recognize as artificial due to their repetitive nature and narrow bandwidths. Hows does this relate to the non-science that is Intelligent Design ?.
ZuluFightrunner 1 year ago
i have been on youtube for a while now. and this by far is THE BEST video I have seen on here -- i have never laughed so hard in a long time. I love Picard.
Thanks so much for posting!
arp76 2 years ago
Awesome. Loved it.
You'd think the face palm would get old... but what other reaction could you have to this?
"Evolution tries to answer basic human questions like who are we, and why are we here"?
WTF?
hossrex 2 years ago 4
Just a slight correction, hdhale2. We can see stars and galaxies that are billions of light years away. :)
Stringprodigy 2 years ago
"We"? you have seen them? measured them? I don't think there's any way to tell how far they are away, not saying they aren't out that far but the trig and other measuring systems are inaccurate and incapable of proving them self's. By the way hdale2 , another correction , the speed of light is not a constant (not always the same speed) its been proven in the labs ;)
TurboGrassHopper 2 years ago
You are so full of shit, Turbo. I personally haven't measured them, but many thousands of astronomers, astrophysicists, cosmologists and other scientists have, and I think it's safe to assume that your level of knowledge on the subject is vastly inferior. Also, the speed of light IS a constant, and has not been proven otherwise in any lab, you idiot.
Stringprodigy 2 years ago
It's very clear who has vastly inferior knowledge of the subject after that last fictional fact you stated lol before you pretend you have any idea what you are talking about why don't you do maybe a tiny tad of research , lol but yes evolutionists are always the first ones to name calling and flipping because it makes them mad when someone proves there lies wrong lol have a nice day ;D
TurboGrassHopper 2 years ago
You don't even know how to use a period to end a sentence or how to properly use the word "there", so before you go around challenging anyone's level of knowledge, you should at least go back to pre-school and get a basic command of English so you don't look like such an uneducated idiot.
Stringprodigy 2 years ago
Hey you put a comma in the wrong spot , and you forgot to use a comma after cosmologists. Lol this guy sent me a message telling me i had vastly inferior education because i put a ;D at the end of my sentence instead of a period lol why don't you go cry to Richard Dawkins about this , he would tell you to keep your ignorant mouth shut. Stupid things like that are first signs your loosing an agrument lol....
TurboGrassHopper 2 years ago
'Loosing an agrument?' Double spelling fail from the start. Good one, retard!
Stringprodigy 2 years ago
Lol your the only one getting mad here, keep crying haha.
TurboGrassHopper 2 years ago
I'm not mad, I'm actually laughing my ass off at your intellectual ineptitude, Simple Jack. ;)
Stringprodigy 2 years ago
I wonder if the guy in the video would care to explain, if the Universe is really 10,000 or so years old, how we can see stars, galaxies and such that are millions of light years away.
I mean, we're talking about the speed of light here...or are we to believe that the speed of light was somehow changed by the Great Flood?
See what I did there? ;-)
hdhale2 2 years ago 25
Well, they could always pull out their "tired light" baloney...
multitasker235 2 years ago 3
Interesting that the first recorded miracle Jesus did was to make wine from water...and not NEW wine, but AGED wine, i.e., wine that was functionally superior for it's purpose.
piranha70 2 years ago 4
@hdhale2
"how we can see stars, galaxies and such that are millions of light years away."
Because his god is a deceptive bastard.
MomoTheBellyDancer 1 year ago
@hdhale2 I have heard this argument many times but we currently have the technology to accurately measure about 70 light years. Even if the stars are great distances apart, this does not tell us what the age of the earth is. I know you are not a Bible believer but maybe you can provide us a definition for "streched out the heavens" Isaiah 44:24 - Thus says the LORD, your Redeemer, who formed you from the womb: "I am the LORD, who made all things, who stretched out the heavens alone
mozartgenetics 1 year ago
Hovind would be succesful in boxing. He would just spout this BS until the opponent has facepalmed himself senseless.
TheOddFinn 2 years ago 4
aaaaaaaaand...
Picard wins by a landslide!
MattTaylor1981 2 years ago 7
I think it is hilarious that the Hovinds are a laughing stock even amongst creationists.
artyfarty2 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Don't you hate it when Eric Hovind says stuff that are true and irreffutable?
chrism76 2 years ago
Not really, as its never happened !
ZuluFightrunner 2 years ago
Or has Eric recently come out and stated that his father is a convicted fraudster?.
ZuluFightrunner 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
stupid video, that isn't a response, it takes massive editing for you primate wannabees, and you dont refute what Hovind said just ridicule.
cbat36 2 years ago
sat⋅ire - noun
1. the use of irony, sarcasm, ridicule, or the like, in exposing, denouncing, or deriding vice, folly, etc.
ZuluFightrunner 2 years ago
Actually I would have to say that Eric raises some good questions. Its a little like listening to an intro philosophy class; but still. How can we be sure we figured it out? Throughout history people have thought they had it all figured out and than had to throw away their theory when some inconvienant evidence surfaced. Than the scramble was one to construct a new one, we would have to be foolish to think we have it all figured out now
equinesport 2 years ago
Mr. hovind shows signs of having never taken a 4th grade science class. He classifies the theories of scientific fields that have nothing to do with biological evolution along with the theory of evolution, things like the big bang and abiogenesis. Besides, we are at a level of understanding at our current development where the question isn't "is this explanation right?" but "what more can we discover?". Almost all of the explanations we are searching for right now pertain to the very small.
Ebrainiac1 2 years ago 5
Yes he does ask some good questions. "The Questions of Life". But spouts nonsesacle jibberish about them.
Like he always does.
I don't even understand this language anymore; Retard Creationist just keeps re-defining words.
Someone get that man an IQ test. He will kind out that Kindergardeners have higher scores.
Freshman000000 2 years ago
kind out? lol we see the kinder gardener here lmao
TurboGrassHopper 2 years ago
Oh, lol.
find*
Freshman000000 2 years ago
@equinesport I would say eric hovind raises no good points. Nothing is 100% proven in science, as evidence comes in theories are re-visited and adjusted likewise. We do not have it all figured out, is why scientists still have jobs.
ZuluFightrunner 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wow what a dum video ken ham and kent hovind get along fine their no problem with them. Let me ask you all a question have you ever study at all evilution? Or Listen to what creationist have to say and what evidence they have?
Jesusgospel 2 years ago
Let me ask you a counter question: what is your first language? Because it evidently isn't English.
lovetoeatallthefood 2 years ago 2
A reply to first very poorly written comment. Yes Kent Hovind is getting along fine serving a prison sentence for tax fraud.
ZuluFightrunner 2 years ago
Creationists don't have any evidence. They don't even have an hypothesis to present, they just have an idea based on speculations. They think that because every life form we know and see today is complex, it must have been created. That is not evidence, that is simple speculation. And they try to attack evolution with no succes to justify their idea. Let's get this once and for all: even if evolution was wrong, wich is not, that does not represent a proof for creationism.
oskitarrodriguez 2 years ago 5
WTF ARE KINDS!?!?!?!!
th3d3wd3r 2 years ago 3
Still awaiting an answer from the creationists on that one ...
ZuluFightrunner 2 years ago
We'll never ever get an answer and it bloody irritates me lol
th3d3wd3r 2 years ago
Its one of those things that they can change the definition of freely... like evolution itself. Its their "go to card" when we use evidence.
Westwoooooooood 2 years ago
Picard brings up a few good points...
Westwoooooooood 2 years ago 31
@Westwoooooooood
Yes Picard pwned him. PMPL
FatRakoon 1 year ago
hahahahaha picard sometimes doesn't even let him finish speaking xDD
bluprint79 2 years ago 5
Just Picard doing us all favor ;)
ZuluFightrunner 2 years ago