I love Roddenberry, but this program is ridiculous. Science-Fiction was almost 100 years old by the time "Trek" aired & it was as out-of-date as any other schlock on tv. It was just well written & thought out. But we'd had everyone from Wells to Bradbury to Lem by that time. SF was *not* pulp magazines & Marvel monster comics in 1966!!!
so, where is the next optimistic vision of the future? That's the most lacking point of science fiction today, and part of it's deteriation in popularity :-(
I want my child to be as optimistic as i am about the future, but I'm aware ST played a big deal for that.
Will Kids growing up today still be curious about alien life, or will they just be frightened of all these invasion-based Stories?
I love Roddenberry, but this program is ridiculous. Science-Fiction was almost 100 years old by the time "Trek" aired & it was as out-of-date as any other schlock on tv. It was just well written & thought out. But we'd had everyone from Wells to Bradbury to Lem by that time. SF was *not* pulp magazines & Marvel monster comics in 1966!!!
amaxamon 1 week ago
so, where is the next optimistic vision of the future? That's the most lacking point of science fiction today, and part of it's deteriation in popularity :-(
I want my child to be as optimistic as i am about the future, but I'm aware ST played a big deal for that.
Will Kids growing up today still be curious about alien life, or will they just be frightened of all these invasion-based Stories?
Phonomatic 1 month ago
thanks for the upload of this fantastic docu
georgemargaris 2 months ago