Tupolev TU-154 Poland Governmental take-off GVA

[Byron10301]

Is this the same plane that crashed? 

[MestreBimba22]

@Byron10301 No that is 102 . 101 is destroy.

[MrMaslo82]

jak ja czytam te zachwyty nad ruskimi osiągnięciami techniki awiacyjnej, to mnie się nie dobrze robi. Nic sami nie potrafią zrobić, a mogli by chociaż zżynać dobrze, a nawet tego nie potrafią. Teraz dopiero, jak się nasz rozbił to wychodzą takie kwiatki jak to, skąd się biorą te bezawaryjne i bezpieczne rosyjskie samoloty pasażerskie. A no stąd że wszystkie samoloty na terenie rosji dopuszcza do użytkowania MAK, już wiadomo, że MAK zawsze ale to zawsze wskazuje winę pilota. Samolot to Święta Kro

[TheDextergen]

Najpiękniejsze 66 sekund mojego życia.

[DrifterThai]

turbo DIESEL ??? 1.9 ?

[olpiter]

Chyba na rope bo tak kopci :D

[bolecki333]

Polish "102". Where is it and when?

[DirtyThing20]

good plane

[cpreeko]

jeny niby on mjest dobry?jen on sie dymi jak by sie palil

[zbigniewbak]

Ruskie dziadostwo, spada z kilkunastu metrów na błoto i rozsypuje się jak z dektury. Nie wsiadłbym do tego samolotu.

[Grzehoo21]

@zbigniewbak

Na zajęciach z fizyki chyba się spało bo piszesz takie głupoty... Domyślam się, że "tam" było takie przeciążenie w momencie uderzenia, że nikt nie miał szans tego przetrwać... Jeśli rozbija się samolot najczęściej 85-100% ginie na miejscu :(

[tomek1158]

@zbigniewbak kazdy by ci sie tak rozsypal debilu

[zbigniewbak]

@tomek1158 widziałem zdjęcia z wielu katastrof przy lądowaniu i nigdy nie widziałem tak rozsypanego samolotu. Najczęściej kilka/kilkanaście osób przeżywa tego typu katastrofę. Rozumiem jakby spadał z 10 000 metrów, ale on podchodzil do lądowania, byl kilka/kilkanascie metrów nad ziemią.

[SQ5IRZ]

@wodnik35 Artur Ziętek.

[krzysiek1003]

PIEKNIE SIE PREZENTUJE NA TYM FILMIKU..STARE ,ALE MA TO COS ....

[truefactsth]

This aircraft first flew in 1968 - 42 years ago. I had the displeasure of flying on one to Bulgaria in 1983 - a truly hair rasing experience landing in a thunderstorm! Even back then, aircraft shook on takeoff and landing and poor workmanship in interior - somewhat akin to the aircrew at the time - nonchalant in approach. Glad we all made it back home safely to tell the tale. Thank goodness they are now banned in my country. Unsafe - Primarily due to lack of regular maintenance!

[CobraFlying]

@truefactsth

Your right! (due to lack of regular maintenance!)

Its not that its a bad aircraft but they dont maintain it as they should in countries lik kazachstan, Russia.... ........

This aircraft however was maintained at the highest level (presidential aircraft).

[spavatch]

@CobraFlying - You're right. Actually I wouldn't be suprised if it was the most advanced Tu-154 in the world. In 2009 it was rebuilt to the highest standards, fitted with new engines and best avionics available (probably even better than any civilian plane could get). In 2010 they did the same thing to plane 102 (the one pictured on this video) and it's in top notch condition but sadly no-one wants to use it after what happened to plane 101 in april 2010. They chose a chartered Embraer instead.

[PAFAWAG1]

Nie tylko jeden najszybszych obecnie latających pasażerskich, ale i jeden z najpiękniejszych, wspaniała sylwetka. Nie jest też taki niebiezpieczny, w razie czego może wylądować na 1 z 3 silników...

[Grzehoo21]

@PAFAWAG1

Tylko w razie wybuchu silnika może być różnie (są blisko siebie) tak jak to miało miejsce z lotowskimi Iłami :/ Ale maszyna pięka! Zastanawiam się dlaczego Lot nie chce Iła 96???

[PAFAWAG1]

@Grzehoo21 Prozachodnia polityka kupowania statków powietrznych :)

[jeanz1299]

@Grzehoo21 za duży na jego potrzeby , w Polsce z powodu pewnych stereotypów ludzie bali by się do niego wsiadać , a poza tym jest nieekonomiczny w w stosunku do zachodnich maszyn przez co Aerofłot bronił się przed nimi rękami i nogami a po zatym lot miał kupować iły 86 które były baaaaaardzo nieekonomiczne między innymi bardzo mały zasięg jak na szerokokadłubowca

[tomek1158]

@PAFAWAG1 bez silników tez moze :D

[LUKASZ332]

@PAFAWAG1 bzdura

[Maciek00007]

Kopci, bo smugi z trzech silników kondensują się w jedna-efekt jak by latał na węgiel.

[tomek1158]

@Maciek00007 kopci bo mu silniki kopca inne wersie tu 154 np tu154b nie kopca

[Maciek00007]

@tomek1158 jak by się czepiać szczegółów to każdy kopci wszystko zależy od konta obserwacji i obciążenia silników. tutka to spoko samolot, są gorsze i to nowej generacji.

[sirMIREK]

102 number. This one has not been crashed in Smolensk. This one is still alive, but don't fly.

[Tupolev102]

@sirMIREK

It's flying :)

[sightscreen66]

@ Spotting2305HD, beautiful high def vid, thanks!

@ wr1830 who is having a go @ komodowarano... there's nothing wrong with a bit of enthusiasm, or do you, in fact, agree with blumoon90's mealy mouthed comment?

[lukasvip7]

Plane smoking because it is diesel engine ;]

[fagocista1980]

ewakuowalem sie tym samolotem "102" podczas konfliktu libansko-izraelskiego w 2006 roku. Samolot byl podstawiony na PD Syrii, na lotnisku w Latakii.

[fagocista1980]

pardąą;) na PN od Libanu, Wsch. Syria;]

[blumoon90]

Looks like a clunker..Condolences to the Polish people

[komodowarano]

@blumoon90 - nonsense. Tu-154M is a Ferrari under passenger jet liners: the fastest, the raciest, the sexiest beast. It is indeed strongly built, and quite safe to fly.

You might get some more information on this fine craft in the Internet.

Now, go get a life.

[wr1830]

@komodowarano You are the one that needs a life after exaggerating the Tu-154. Indeed, the Tu-154 is a great airliner (one of my top 5), but it is certainly not the "fastest, the raciest, the sexiest beast". When you're ready to talk facts instead of hyperbolae or subjective opinions, let me know.

[av21031]

@wr1830 Several aviation sites say that the Tu-154 is the fastest airliner in operation (since the demise of the Concorde). I doubt that any other plane could keep up with a 154 at full throttle, although i wouldn't want to pay the fuel bill of one to try it out....

[Zygmuntification1]

Głupki ! to jest 102-ka też życzycie żeby się rozbił ?????

[Akusz]

Thank You for this movie and condolences!

[Tas131]

102 jeszcze lata ciekawo jak dlugo

[maximus1383]

@Tas131 odperdol sie od tego samolotu frajerze

[UKeyyyyy]

@Tas131 Pewnie do czasu aż znów jacyś nasi inteligentni politycy

nie wymyślą karkołomnej wycieczki...

[polakio92]

zapraszam do siebie, mam filmy z polskiego kosciola w usa na ksze sw. kaczynskiego

[stradziu]

RIP ;(

[ghostintheshelll]

Now they have crashed the other one. This is so incredibly sad! That beautiful aircraft is destroyed!

[Marcinex22]

This plane is sooo old...

[Omitsch1982]

@Marcinex22 Sooo old?!?!?! dumpass! 20 years is nothing for a plane. Go and eat shit! But maybe your mass media fucked your brain, like Kaczynski did... May he rest in peace. And polish people, wake up! Welcome to the XXI century! Do not pass the responsibility to somebody else, everytime! It is not Russia's fault, nor "age" of the plane! It's your POLISH pilots' or maybe your own POLISH president's fault! No old plane here!

[Marcinex22]

@Omitsch1982

TU-154 first flight was in 1968. I don't care if it was manufactured in 1990, it's sooo old technology.

[Omitsch1982]

@Marcinex22 Boeing 737's firs flight was in 1967, and would you say "it is sooo old! I don't care that they were built in 1990, it is old technology!" For your information: the 154M first flight was in 1982! Commercial use only since 1984!

Maybe in fucking Poland they build planes and cars, constructed in the 60ies without any modernization for 40 years! The plane which crashed was modern when it was manufactored and it got newest technology in December 2009! thisone is in RUS now for mod

[Marcinex22]

@Omitsch1982

O yeah, you can also say that this crappy TU-154M was better than Obama's Air Force One. Bullshiting.

[Omitsch1982]

@Marcinex22 I don't know about Obama's Airforce One. Only that Boeing 747 had first flight in 1969 and that such Boeings are in service as Airforce One since 1990 (but were built earlier!). So it is older than "Kaczynski's" plane.

But i know that this Tu-154M is not "ooold technology", as you want to make us think. The airplane which crashed had newest (also western) technologies. By the way purposes of AFO and polish 101 are (were) different, so nothing to compare.

[Faust075]

NO. It is not this aircraft that crashed this morning in Smolensk. The aircraft in this video is number "102" and is currently under maintenance in Moscow.

The aircraft that crashed is sistership number "101".

[dariuszjaszczynski]

These machine had today in Smoleńsk crashed. Polish president is dead. [*]

[bulletterich]

@dariuszjaszczynski, no this is No. 102. No. 101 crashed.

R.I.P

[dariuszjaszczynski]

@bulletterich Yes, I've missed the serial No. Of course I meant this Tupolev model. :(

[4rmar]

@dariuszjaszczynski

Tu-154 crashed because someone forced the pilot to land in thick fog.

One of the passengers in a hurry ...

[ciawar]

@4rmar how do you know that wise ass? have you been there on board and heard that? Stop spreading bullshit!!!

[Torsten13571]

Have you read stenograms??? the pilot was not idiot, he wanted to reach 100m height and decice what to do. What happened in last seconds ist hard to claim. It makes me angry,when somebody judges himself without evidences,it concerns PIS too. It,was this party do,is embarrassing

[4rmar]

@Torsten13571 Pilot was forbidden to land, so the general Błasik watched the landing, sent to the cockpit with the approval of President Lech Kaczynski.

Without a transcript, we know that someone has forced the pilot to land in violation of the thick fog.

[silesianfisz]

@4rmar bulszit men! byłeś tam?

[Hypnixio]

yep Tupolev is a smoky aircraft :P