Look up ex KGB. One guy named Yuri, gives his take in this. Very scary. Especilaly since it was filmed in 1985. Check it out. ALso have you ever read "Atlas Shrugged"? It was written by Ayn Rand. ALan Greenspan was quite a fan of hers. He was the longest chairman of the federal reserve....ANyways you'd get it, if you read the book.
It's simple. Some are more after money (=power)and some are humanistic endeavors. It's the same concept as the war between your flesh and spirit. lol. All religion understand this concept. Politics is religion. What is going on right now, is a sruggle betwenn capitalism (which brings expoitation, pollution, demoralisation) and socialism. Karl Marx predicted this what would happen with capitalism. We are seeing a rise in a sypathetic view towards socialsim. Liberation theology has it's role in it
This all can lead to a 1 world gov. these groups all control certain parts of the american government. And they have controll of are money, now foir example Homeland Security has nothing to do with this because its protected us from terrorist or illegal immagration
This goes far beyond American government but stretches into every nation on the earth. Every Country except 3 have a central bank in them, ours is called the Federal Reserve.
Obama will cause our dollar to bottom out which will preclude the introduction of the Amero and the loss of American Sovereignty.
These are the same people that produced the European Union.
I'm not a fan of Federal Reserve one bit, and strongly believe in bringing back the Gold standard, but to say Obama will cause our dollar to bottom is ridiculous. You should be more concern about one corporations rather than one nation, because it's corporations that REALLY running this country, not the government. Our congressmen and lawmakers are just a pawn for them.
Well I personally have no interest to pursue this conspiracy, mainly because of the second amendment. As long as I have that then I don't believe this theory.
I agree. Tomorrow, a hundred years from now. If we got guns and protect that right. Well if it bleeds I think we can kill it. Still I like reading into it just to prepare for the worst and hope for the best.
Nevertheless, like a hostile corporate takeover is the way they will co-opt American sovereignty. If the North American Union happens (which is a pit-stop towards world domination) outside of a few articles by commentators, and perhaps a few protests in the streets, most people will be so involved in their own lives, they won't care.
I'm not going to play the game of conservative against liberal. An ideological war, a cultural war makes us take our eyes off the ball. Liberals are NOT my enemy.
Well for one thing we could fight the bailouts together. Both sides liberals,dems,conservatives,repubs. We must stand together on something that truly does not benefit us. This is money that we should not even talk about being divided up amongst us. No corporate bailout, no money spread from government decision. It is not Democracy and not capitalism and not free market. And government interference caused this crisis by sub-prime pandering which is socialism on governments behalf.
Ron Paul stood on the Senate floor and clearly stated the Constitution does not give us the right to abuse public money in this manner. He was ignored!
Well maybe its up to people not our ignored politicians. People get out and protest over every silly thing in mass numbers. Not many on this issue. I saw a few videos of people rioting in Latvia and Britain over their governments bailouts. Of course unemployment was part of the issue to. Maybe we should go to D.C. and not leave until the bailouts stop.
great video. however, your right it is extremely difficult to come to a conclusion in this situation. If you haven't heard not only is that Amereuro ( not sure if that's spelled right) may come soon. But a Global currency setting all of europe and NA much more than this economic crises even did.
With so many fanatical conspiracy theorists out there, it is hard to find any legitimate authors on this subject. You are someone who is level-headed and well educated. You should write a book on this matter. I would definitely buy it.
What exactly do you mean by "stand together as Americans"? The global community has grown stronger in many ways, but I don't foresee this as a threat to the USA or our freedom if that's what you're suggesting. (At least not in my lifetime.)
It is a threat. Its a threat because of right-wing greed and left wing apathy. Liberals favor a more socialist, global society. Republicans/big business want to safeguard their profits by exporting jobs, and making trade easier. The remedy is nationalistic conservatism, of course.
But I agree, I don't think its something America can't overcome. Public resistance and the Constitution will will be a barrier to the worst. But vigilance and proactivity are essential.
What I mean is liberals and conservatives standing together to ensure America's sovereignty. To ensure that this country is not sold out.
The global community is fine, this is a small earth, however, the day we throw out the Constitution is the day America dies.
My goodness, just in the last few months we've seen Bush and Congress completely ignore the Constitution and do things with absolutely no authority to do so.
If you've read the discussion between me and colony, you should see that the Constitution has been impotent in preventing the Government from usurping power not given to it. Colony makes a fine point that it has been going on for 150 years now. I think the socialistic tendencies being seen now are abusing the precedences of more innocuous power grabs like the DOE. Both parties are guilty for different reasons. The corp/right from greed, the left from ideology. The Constitution is where we start.
The Constitution is only impotent when our elected politicians skirt it and the judicial branch does nothing to enforce it's teeth.
I would also say there is far more greed on the left than the right. Greed for our tax dollars, a hunger to feed at the public trough. Although Bush and the GOP Congress should themselves to be pretty greedy as well.
Yes, I agree; I just wish the people we elect would agree so whole-heartedly. It's as if the country has become so downtrodden almost overnight. It would help if we specifically knew WHAT to do.
We need to elect officials who will uphold the Constitution, that's all.
Ron Paul stood on the Senate floor and clearly stated the Constitution does not give us the right to bail out anyone with taxpayer money. He was right. He was also ignored by many of our politicians.
We need politicians who will severely uphold our Constitution or all is lost.
weneed....I'm with you...I'm not playing either. This is an important time in America....we can start thinking as Americans or we can follow those who make their living splitting us apart.
You and I don't agree on everything....nor do I agree with my incredible wife of 33 years on everything...but when you respect the other instead of condemning them a more powerfull union is built.
Some would argue that the constitutions is in need of reform. Take, for example, the so-called Patriot Act. Also, lots of people can't agree on certain parts of the constitution, like abortion. When we say "uphold the constitution" we open ourselves up to a LOT of disagreement, division, and uncertainty. "Uphold the Constitution" is a very broad statement. I see what you're saying, but we need to approach this solution with great care.
Neither The Patriot Act nor abortion is part of the Constitution (we only have one). Read Article 1, sec 8. The Constitution is really very narrow when it comes to the delegation of Federal powers.
Duuude! This is why I love the Internet... People like you sharing information. You are right, of course. Thanks for the clarity. For as much misinformation as there is online, I am glad you set me straight about this.
Who is at the forefront against the micro chip? The ACLU! a liberal organization.
The one world order is nothing new. Lord Bertand Russell praised the idea in the early part of the century. In the 19th Century, Edward Bellamy wrote the 3rd best-selling book of the century, Looking Backward. And it gained a huge amount of support. According to Bellamy, the idea promises peace and prosperity for all.
I think you're reading too much into the existence of these organizations. The Federal Reserve is nothing more than a continuation of Alexander Hamilton's First Bank of the United States and the guiding principles behind it, and the subsequent Banks that were necessary, yet opposed by Jefferson and by Andrew Jackson. I do think that Michio Kaku is right when he states that our world is on its way to forming a global community, in order to be able to deal with the coming First Contact events...
Very interesting video... YEARS AGO... i used to have mad visions and debates that Corporate America would EVENTUALLY BE under one Corporation... then that one conglomorate would Rule and run the world... this would be too bleek for me.
I fear not at all. But I doubt it not. Take America itself it has no real unity and I mean that because that would be perfect. Lets see a one world government actually change men like me with guns but all around the world. Never will happen. To much suppression and to much reward to manage.
Why would these groups publicity *publish* what they want to do? It makes no sense.
It also depends on what you mean by "globalization". The global economy is completely interdependent. This is the result of the information revolution and really is not a bad thing.
One day we will wake up and realize that we are ALL just *people* and get rid of the imaginary lines we draw in the dirt.
I think you make some interesting points about globalization. I believe our Constitution will ultimately save our sovereignty. I also think this argument will be the next extreme view (presented as a conspiracy theory) that will swing American opinion back to the right. Americans would never accept an "Amero." I don't care who's president. That's like Rangel making an ironic attempt to reinstate the draft. Liberal America wouldn't stand for it.
You are more optimistic than I am. We'll be saved by the Constitution? When, for example, was the last time a politician paid attention to the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution?
But I hope you're right that, at some point, Americans - Republicans and Democrats alike - will see the light and say, "Enough is enough!"
I would say every time a state ratifies a definition of marriage into their constitution is a perfect example of a politician's use of the Tenth Amendment. But I don't see a connection with globalism and how that amendment can save US sovereignty. Maybe you are referring to Brazilian sovereignty.
My point is that incredible and continuing abuse of the Tenth Amendment (over 150 years) has allowed the federal government to grow to an abominal, unjustifiable size, that sucks tax dollars out of the economy, reduces American productivity and ingenuity, and makes the U.S. incredibly dependent on other nations to finance its massive debt. The U.S. would not be getting blackmailed into "globalism" or world socialism had it not built up such massive debt.
Again, I don't understand the connection with the 10th amendment. You're not explaining how it applies. You're just defining it as the culprit.
I think you're trying to make a point about State's rights. I'm on your side. But you've opened a complex argument about financial irresponsibility. Its a snake eating its tail, if you ask me. Unless you find a way to educate the sheeple who put folks like Frank, Pelosi, Reid, and Obama into office, you'll never change things. Repubs aren't sinless.
None of the politicians are sinless, which is why I say there is a 150-year history of ignoring the Teneth Amendment. My point is that the feds do things they have no legal right to do, which is why we have such horrendous debt. The federal budget could be tiny if the Constitution were actually followed. Then we wouldn't rely on foreigners to finance us.
You are correct, the solution is in education. But those who are causing the most trouble are, regrettably, in charge of education.
Legal or Constitutional? Not meaning to be contentious, but the Constitution doesn't exist to give legal rights, only give and restrict powers from the Federal government. If it isn't enumerated in the Constitution, it falls to the States unless the States are restricted by Article I or the BoR, in which case it falls to the people. Thus, most of what the Federal government does is unconstitutional. SSA, Public Education regulation, federal budgeting are all unconstitutional, but not illegal.
I see your point. I imagine one could argue, however, that if a law is unconstitutional then it has no proper foundation and hence cannot actually be part of the law. But most would argue that the law is proper and enforceable until the Supreme Court rules it unconstitutional.
But the SCOTUS is never going to rule, for example, that the creation of the Department of Education was unconstitutional (although it was, based on the Tenth Amendment). So I guess we're stuck - until a revolution!
Americans don't have to accept the "Amero." They seem to have already accepted the Chinese Yen... they just don't realize it yet. Hopefully they will wake up before it is too late.
The Trilateral Commission? It's a think tank, not a New World Order.
VanDoodah 2 years ago
amazing, well done. Favorited and subbed
Krealix 2 years ago
you talked about the trilateral commmission!!
n1bleachfreak 3 years ago
Now that is scary, broading the president's power could bring a "hitler" like leader to the presidency.
glyan14 3 years ago
Trilateral Commission was planning a 1 world leader and government hmmmm.... The antichrist maybe?
n1bleachfreak 3 years ago
Look up ex KGB. One guy named Yuri, gives his take in this. Very scary. Especilaly since it was filmed in 1985. Check it out. ALso have you ever read "Atlas Shrugged"? It was written by Ayn Rand. ALan Greenspan was quite a fan of hers. He was the longest chairman of the federal reserve....ANyways you'd get it, if you read the book.
InFromTheVoid 3 years ago
It's simple. Some are more after money (=power)and some are humanistic endeavors. It's the same concept as the war between your flesh and spirit. lol. All religion understand this concept. Politics is religion. What is going on right now, is a sruggle betwenn capitalism (which brings expoitation, pollution, demoralisation) and socialism. Karl Marx predicted this what would happen with capitalism. We are seeing a rise in a sypathetic view towards socialsim. Liberation theology has it's role in it
InFromTheVoid 3 years ago
That's too difficult to understand.
SungJungHyun 3 years ago
Whats hard to understand?
n1bleachfreak 3 years ago
Everything........
SungJungHyun 3 years ago
This all can lead to a 1 world gov. these groups all control certain parts of the american government. And they have controll of are money, now foir example Homeland Security has nothing to do with this because its protected us from terrorist or illegal immagration
n1bleachfreak 3 years ago
This goes far beyond American government but stretches into every nation on the earth. Every Country except 3 have a central bank in them, ours is called the Federal Reserve.
Obama will cause our dollar to bottom out which will preclude the introduction of the Amero and the loss of American Sovereignty.
These are the same people that produced the European Union.
theobamafactor 3 years ago
I'm not a fan of Federal Reserve one bit, and strongly believe in bringing back the Gold standard, but to say Obama will cause our dollar to bottom is ridiculous. You should be more concern about one corporations rather than one nation, because it's corporations that REALLY running this country, not the government. Our congressmen and lawmakers are just a pawn for them.
donjabroni 2 years ago
Thanks For Sharing
Bassfooler 3 years ago
Well I personally have no interest to pursue this conspiracy, mainly because of the second amendment. As long as I have that then I don't believe this theory.
gohoggyourself 3 years ago
I agree. Tomorrow, a hundred years from now. If we got guns and protect that right. Well if it bleeds I think we can kill it. Still I like reading into it just to prepare for the worst and hope for the best.
LokiScoutSniper 3 years ago
There's a reason they've been attacking the
2nd amendment for some time now.
Nevertheless, like a hostile corporate takeover is the way they will co-opt American sovereignty. If the North American Union happens (which is a pit-stop towards world domination) outside of a few articles by commentators, and perhaps a few protests in the streets, most people will be so involved in their own lives, they won't care.
Call it a bloodless coo.
weneedmccain 3 years ago
The Trilateral Commission is real
n1bleachfreak 3 years ago
Some just watched Zigast or whatever.`
GhostofRazors 3 years ago
How are you not forced to "play" in the system? The only way out would be to start your own country.
notthehulk442 3 years ago
I'm not going to play the game of conservative against liberal. An ideological war, a cultural war makes us take our eyes off the ball. Liberals are NOT my enemy.
weneedmccain 3 years ago
Well for one thing we could fight the bailouts together. Both sides liberals,dems,conservatives,repubs. We must stand together on something that truly does not benefit us. This is money that we should not even talk about being divided up amongst us. No corporate bailout, no money spread from government decision. It is not Democracy and not capitalism and not free market. And government interference caused this crisis by sub-prime pandering which is socialism on governments behalf.
LokiScoutSniper 3 years ago
I agree wholeheartedly!
Ron Paul stood on the Senate floor and clearly stated the Constitution does not give us the right to abuse public money in this manner. He was ignored!
weneedmccain 3 years ago
Well maybe its up to people not our ignored politicians. People get out and protest over every silly thing in mass numbers. Not many on this issue. I saw a few videos of people rioting in Latvia and Britain over their governments bailouts. Of course unemployment was part of the issue to. Maybe we should go to D.C. and not leave until the bailouts stop.
LokiScoutSniper 3 years ago
great video. however, your right it is extremely difficult to come to a conclusion in this situation. If you haven't heard not only is that Amereuro ( not sure if that's spelled right) may come soon. But a Global currency setting all of europe and NA much more than this economic crises even did.
boscofan59 3 years ago
With so many fanatical conspiracy theorists out there, it is hard to find any legitimate authors on this subject. You are someone who is level-headed and well educated. You should write a book on this matter. I would definitely buy it.
JERice7 3 years ago
What exactly do you mean by "stand together as Americans"? The global community has grown stronger in many ways, but I don't foresee this as a threat to the USA or our freedom if that's what you're suggesting. (At least not in my lifetime.)
faething 3 years ago
It is a threat. Its a threat because of right-wing greed and left wing apathy. Liberals favor a more socialist, global society. Republicans/big business want to safeguard their profits by exporting jobs, and making trade easier. The remedy is nationalistic conservatism, of course.
But I agree, I don't think its something America can't overcome. Public resistance and the Constitution will will be a barrier to the worst. But vigilance and proactivity are essential.
CityOnTheHill 3 years ago
What I mean is liberals and conservatives standing together to ensure America's sovereignty. To ensure that this country is not sold out.
The global community is fine, this is a small earth, however, the day we throw out the Constitution is the day America dies.
My goodness, just in the last few months we've seen Bush and Congress completely ignore the Constitution and do things with absolutely no authority to do so.
weneedmccain 3 years ago 2
If you've read the discussion between me and colony, you should see that the Constitution has been impotent in preventing the Government from usurping power not given to it. Colony makes a fine point that it has been going on for 150 years now. I think the socialistic tendencies being seen now are abusing the precedences of more innocuous power grabs like the DOE. Both parties are guilty for different reasons. The corp/right from greed, the left from ideology. The Constitution is where we start.
batesm 3 years ago
The Constitution is only impotent when our elected politicians skirt it and the judicial branch does nothing to enforce it's teeth.
I would also say there is far more greed on the left than the right. Greed for our tax dollars, a hunger to feed at the public trough. Although Bush and the GOP Congress should themselves to be pretty greedy as well.
weneedmccain 3 years ago
Yes, I agree; I just wish the people we elect would agree so whole-heartedly. It's as if the country has become so downtrodden almost overnight. It would help if we specifically knew WHAT to do.
faething 3 years ago
We need to elect officials who will uphold the Constitution, that's all.
Ron Paul stood on the Senate floor and clearly stated the Constitution does not give us the right to bail out anyone with taxpayer money. He was right. He was also ignored by many of our politicians.
We need politicians who will severely uphold our Constitution or all is lost.
weneedmccain 3 years ago
weneed....I'm with you...I'm not playing either. This is an important time in America....we can start thinking as Americans or we can follow those who make their living splitting us apart.
You and I don't agree on everything....nor do I agree with my incredible wife of 33 years on everything...but when you respect the other instead of condemning them a more powerfull union is built.
I appreciate this video very much.
wittumy 3 years ago
I agree wholeheartedly. Liberals care about this country as much as I do.
Question, to you, what's the difference between a liberal and a secular progressive?
While the term liberal has been drastically altered in the last 100 years, I see a stark difference between the two.
Your thoughts?
weneedmccain 3 years ago
weneed....I've never heard of secular progressives. When I tried to google it I got a headache.
Since I don't really consider myself a total liberal...I couldn't help you there either. I'm a Heinz 57 American.
wittumy 3 years ago
Some would argue that the constitutions is in need of reform. Take, for example, the so-called Patriot Act. Also, lots of people can't agree on certain parts of the constitution, like abortion. When we say "uphold the constitution" we open ourselves up to a LOT of disagreement, division, and uncertainty. "Uphold the Constitution" is a very broad statement. I see what you're saying, but we need to approach this solution with great care.
faething 3 years ago
Neither The Patriot Act nor abortion is part of the Constitution (we only have one). Read Article 1, sec 8. The Constitution is really very narrow when it comes to the delegation of Federal powers.
batesm 3 years ago
Aren't ammendments part of the constitution?
faething 3 years ago
Yes...they are. But the Patriot Act and abortion is not part of any amendment.
batesm 3 years ago
Duuude! This is why I love the Internet... People like you sharing information. You are right, of course. Thanks for the clarity. For as much misinformation as there is online, I am glad you set me straight about this.
faething 3 years ago
Please don't get your clarity from the internet. Don't they teach the Constitution in high schools anymore?
Get a copy of the Constitution and read it.
batesm 3 years ago
"We MUST hang together for if we do not we will surley hang separately" Ben Franklin
Yeah, Americans have been asleep at the wheel-I will not play either-NO WHITE FLAGS.
FEATURING this one. Thx for your hard wk! ^j^
wildflowersandi 3 years ago
the world order you speak of is the united nations
levibg93 3 years ago
Who is at the forefront against the micro chip? The ACLU! a liberal organization.
The one world order is nothing new. Lord Bertand Russell praised the idea in the early part of the century. In the 19th Century, Edward Bellamy wrote the 3rd best-selling book of the century, Looking Backward. And it gained a huge amount of support. According to Bellamy, the idea promises peace and prosperity for all.
BeatBuddy 3 years ago
redrum redrum
Bassfooler 3 years ago
Yep! The Empire Is Dieing!
Praise The LORD and Pass The Ammunition!
FREEDOM! It's Worth Fighting For!
Dio Vindice!
rebelstang 3 years ago
I think you're reading too much into the existence of these organizations. The Federal Reserve is nothing more than a continuation of Alexander Hamilton's First Bank of the United States and the guiding principles behind it, and the subsequent Banks that were necessary, yet opposed by Jefferson and by Andrew Jackson. I do think that Michio Kaku is right when he states that our world is on its way to forming a global community, in order to be able to deal with the coming First Contact events...
armyveteran101st 3 years ago
Very interesting video... YEARS AGO... i used to have mad visions and debates that Corporate America would EVENTUALLY BE under one Corporation... then that one conglomorate would Rule and run the world... this would be too bleek for me.
xfire1prod 3 years ago
I fear not at all. But I doubt it not. Take America itself it has no real unity and I mean that because that would be perfect. Lets see a one world government actually change men like me with guns but all around the world. Never will happen. To much suppression and to much reward to manage.
LokiScoutSniper 3 years ago
Why would these groups publicity *publish* what they want to do? It makes no sense.
It also depends on what you mean by "globalization". The global economy is completely interdependent. This is the result of the information revolution and really is not a bad thing.
One day we will wake up and realize that we are ALL just *people* and get rid of the imaginary lines we draw in the dirt.
sorienor 3 years ago
I think you make some interesting points about globalization. I believe our Constitution will ultimately save our sovereignty. I also think this argument will be the next extreme view (presented as a conspiracy theory) that will swing American opinion back to the right. Americans would never accept an "Amero." I don't care who's president. That's like Rangel making an ironic attempt to reinstate the draft. Liberal America wouldn't stand for it.
CityOnTheHill 3 years ago
You are more optimistic than I am. We'll be saved by the Constitution? When, for example, was the last time a politician paid attention to the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution?
But I hope you're right that, at some point, Americans - Republicans and Democrats alike - will see the light and say, "Enough is enough!"
colony14 3 years ago
I would say every time a state ratifies a definition of marriage into their constitution is a perfect example of a politician's use of the Tenth Amendment. But I don't see a connection with globalism and how that amendment can save US sovereignty. Maybe you are referring to Brazilian sovereignty.
CityOnTheHill 3 years ago
My point is that incredible and continuing abuse of the Tenth Amendment (over 150 years) has allowed the federal government to grow to an abominal, unjustifiable size, that sucks tax dollars out of the economy, reduces American productivity and ingenuity, and makes the U.S. incredibly dependent on other nations to finance its massive debt. The U.S. would not be getting blackmailed into "globalism" or world socialism had it not built up such massive debt.
colony14 3 years ago
Again, I don't understand the connection with the 10th amendment. You're not explaining how it applies. You're just defining it as the culprit.
I think you're trying to make a point about State's rights. I'm on your side. But you've opened a complex argument about financial irresponsibility. Its a snake eating its tail, if you ask me. Unless you find a way to educate the sheeple who put folks like Frank, Pelosi, Reid, and Obama into office, you'll never change things. Repubs aren't sinless.
CityOnTheHill 3 years ago
None of the politicians are sinless, which is why I say there is a 150-year history of ignoring the Teneth Amendment. My point is that the feds do things they have no legal right to do, which is why we have such horrendous debt. The federal budget could be tiny if the Constitution were actually followed. Then we wouldn't rely on foreigners to finance us.
You are correct, the solution is in education. But those who are causing the most trouble are, regrettably, in charge of education.
colony14 3 years ago
Legal or Constitutional? Not meaning to be contentious, but the Constitution doesn't exist to give legal rights, only give and restrict powers from the Federal government. If it isn't enumerated in the Constitution, it falls to the States unless the States are restricted by Article I or the BoR, in which case it falls to the people. Thus, most of what the Federal government does is unconstitutional. SSA, Public Education regulation, federal budgeting are all unconstitutional, but not illegal.
batesm 3 years ago
I see your point. I imagine one could argue, however, that if a law is unconstitutional then it has no proper foundation and hence cannot actually be part of the law. But most would argue that the law is proper and enforceable until the Supreme Court rules it unconstitutional.
But the SCOTUS is never going to rule, for example, that the creation of the Department of Education was unconstitutional (although it was, based on the Tenth Amendment). So I guess we're stuck - until a revolution!
colony14 3 years ago
Americans don't have to accept the "Amero." They seem to have already accepted the Chinese Yen... they just don't realize it yet. Hopefully they will wake up before it is too late.
colony14 3 years ago
Good point!
weneedmccain 3 years ago
Very insightful video. In many ways I think we're already there and will continue to move in that direction.
kerasea 3 years ago
I don't see how there is any doubt about any of this. It's about globalization, One World Order, destruction of the Sovereignty of all nations.
ZombieX13 3 years ago
So many groups.
mikeandsteveparody24 3 years ago