Added: 1 year ago
From: DragonsSpirit
Views: 35,474
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (99)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This looks more like JELLY WATER

  • 100000000000000000000000000000­0000000000000000000000000 particles xD

  • that would have taken my computer a year to render, lol

  • como avalo meu RealFlow original?

  • 0:17 - Do you believe in God? :)))

  • 145 hours? no turning off of computer? 0_0

  • amazing

  • Bro, do you mean by radius on the emitter the settings in the display settings for size? Also, for the resolution what was it if I may ask?

  • @CmptrGmr

    No. Im talking bout radius in the mesh settings. If your emitter is "inserted" to the mesh, you should be able to see it parented to the mesh node and if you klick on that "copy" of the emitter you will see some settings. Like radius.

    good luck :)

  • @DragonsSpirit Ya I found it after I asked the question. Thanks for a fast response though.

  • looks great

  • not chaotic enough for the realistic aspect, but really fuckin' cool anyway.

  • holy shit :O

    AN ARROW CAME OUT OF MY KNEE

  • blood?

  • omg?

    

  • Fanta??

  • Ma ma mia Indeed.

  • mmmmm jelly !

  • 145 hours thats like a whole week,

  • "Rendertime over 145 hours for this sequence" What makes you dedicate that much time for a rendition?

  • My dual core died just showing this to me. :/

  • are u a wizard?

  • Imagine that in the future this could be done in realtime! Its only a matter of time my guess 15 years from now.

  • Orange Juice

  • thumbs up if u watched this on ORIGINAL!

  • Fake. I mean real. I mean... wait... what?

  • So if i have 100 in resolution? does it get mega super hd?

  • its either SLOOOW MOOOOTIOOON

    or SOOOOO BIIIIG!

    

  • It's funny because when I saw your animation, i shit myself the same way

  • that looked sooooo real

  • That's just unbelievably awesome.

  • why at 1080p does it still look like shit...im callin' uprez haha

  • looks quite epic

  • Someone on youtube FINALLY gets their liquid to look like water... and they make it orange. God damn it. 

  • What program is that?

  • @FranciscoMartins21 realflow

  • @Gtorres12PS3 is it a seperate program or a add on

  • @kimi450 u use the program to do this but you can add it onto cinema 4d so both

  • @Gtorres12PS3 thx

  • Wow thats awessome!!! Imagine you on the middle of this splash!!!

  • *splash*

  • IRON CROSS! 0:19

  • what was your rendersoftware?

  • very appetizing material!

  • I want to drink it :P

  • Time of render: Arnold Schwarzenegger

  • Wow, this looks so real, the shader is AWESOME

  • this shit is wild.

  • this looks like........ i dont know, but amazing!

  • That looks so delicious.

  • :16 Religious imagery! But yea this was really nice good job

  • como haces para tener tantas particulas a mi maximo me salen 200000 particulas ??

  • Can you render air in Realflow?

  • I make YouTube Custom Backgrounds and Custom Intros for your Channels! I only charge 5$ for Each. So Hit me up if you want Something made. Thanks

  • OMG you need Octane Render with a few GTX 480 or higher i suggest dual sli at least

  • @PreVaylMusic

    Im not so sure that would make it any better. The instructions a CPU can run are more complex and efficient than what a GPU can do in many cases, also my CPU has access to 24GB of memory. I think for a render like this one, where the meshes become bery big in some frames, a GPU is not the best choice. But I would LOVE to try it out^^ I have only a single GTX 470 in use currently...nice card but it cannot handle most of my stuff in octane. And i can NOT afford 4x GTX580 or 480.

  • @DragonsSpirit looks so great and real. !! i'll be having a i7 2600k @4.5GHz, GTX 570 would this be enough to render fast on 720p?

  • @AiDz0r

    "fast" is a really relative word^^ Your CPU would do a good job on this one. But if you want to render other stuff with more detail, size and everything that explodes rendertime (refraction, reflection, blur), then you may find it slow. Just like any other CPU ;-)

  • @DragonsSpirit xD i see, do you render with CPU or GPU, i'm not quiet sure. I heard GPU would be faster?

  • @AiDz0r

    That depends alot on the application. GPUs due to their heavy parallelism can do simple jobs very fast and outperform any CPU, but at the same time their processing cores are rather simple. A CPU can execute very complex tasks which makes it more efficient again and thus it is shit faster in any application if you go core vs core @ same MHz. Also, a GPU only has acces to very low GB of memory. No 24GB+ like on CPU. Which is why I render on CPU, my stuff would never fit on a graphicscard

  • @DragonsSpirit Can you render using both?! CPU + GPU ?!

  • WTF I JUST REALIZED YOUTUBE DOES "ORIGINAL" ?!? WTFF HOW DO YOU DO THAT?!

  • @DragonsSpirit I'm thinking to start on this project, it would be very complex and hard. And i'll be learning while i do it. Basically visualized motion-capture, and bind it to the skeleton of a model, then using FaceWare, act the face expressions. It would be an action scene, so im thinking to do this really crazy thing which i would make 3D gun props from water using RealFlow, and shooting water bullets xD Nuke for tracking/composting.

  • @PreVaylMusic

    Also...when I look at the pricing of those badass GPUs....if I had the money to get 4 of them, that means I also have to get an SR2 board, and that means I can shit money, because then I also need at least 2 PSUs to make sure it will run 24/7 for some years. Of course enough memory is essential then...and two xeon CPUs. I tell you: If I had the money, I would get 2 6-core CPUs on that board and overclock them, instead of spending almost 3K on GPUs which dont help me simulate in RF

  • @DragonsSpirit Great idea! :D

    EVGA Classified SR-2

    A LOT OF RAM (dont remember maximum ram on that mobo)

    and dual Xeons with 6 cores each :3

  • @DragonsSpirit

    BigO from Origin PC suits your need.

  • @DragonsSpirit even with a quadro 6000 u couldnt render that because the 6gb vram of the card would never be enough for those billions of polygones...

  • @DragonsSpirit Soon you will not even need a good PC to do any visuals, it will all be unlimited.

  • @DragonsSpirit I don't even get the point of spending a fortune on a computer because you wanna simulate slime?

  • @TheGnuff

    Because F1 people spend fortunes on racing cars just to smoke the same roads x times in a row without getting anywhere at all. Seriously...some people think the PC was meant to be a replacement for life, social stuff and games. Other had work to do and made it a tool. At some point your skills are no longer the only defining attribute to get your work done and thats where your tools come in. shitty machine --> shitty work. Or great work in shitty time. Or not even one of both.

  • @DragonsSpirit I can't believe you compared professional F1 drivers who make millions to simulating water in a box.

  • @TheGnuff

    Driving can be an art, simulation can be an art. Hard work over time to accomplish skill. Art. I cant believe that "making millions" defines to you what skill or art is and what is not. Too many people do. I dont know much about F1 and my example is pretty much respectless and simplified...just as your comment. I respect people who like F1 or are part of it...does not make me a fan but I hope you get the point.

    btw I think this aint goin anywhere so pls stop posting like that

  • @DragonsSpirit No I don't think this is going anywhere either, it's like convinging a vegan that bacon gives you afterlife.

  • @DragonsSpirit it is better to have several mid range PC connected each other instead of 1 big

    for example take 3~4 1055t on 970A mobo with 2 HD 6790 and 4X4Go ram and it would be cheaper and faster for rendering than sr2 with xeon and firepro

  • @Nagby3

    Depends on WHAT you render. Dont forget the network bottleneck you may have with a cluster. If you deal with 10GB+ per frame you will reconsider the network approach because it gets pretty expensive to have a 10Gbit network up and running for 3 machines + Raid. Also consider power usage. 3 Machines totally smoke 1 in terms of power draw. And RealFlow (the simulation software used here) cannot run distributed. Same for Naiad...currently. For R&D/shading with fluids, local power rules.

  • @DragonsSpirit you can run 1/3 of the video on each PCs and i think 3x1055t+6x6790 doesn't need a lot more power than 2xXeon+4xfirepro/tesla

  • @PreVaylMusic SLI does nothing for computational purposes, it's only for sharing the framebuffer. Plus, the GTX series is not optimized for double-precision FLOPS. A better choice would be the Quadro series

  • @PreVaylMusic lol GTX 480 suck dude

  • what is your renderer? if its renderkit, is there a renderkit for x32 or x86 3D studio max? 

  • @137bff

    I use Cinema 4D r11.5 for all my rendering currently. Never used renderkit...

  • High did you use a fluid domain or did you use particle fluids in realflow? How did you create the cylinder of particles at the start, I can only create such object in a fluid domain.

  • thats the best color or shader i have EVER seen!

  • wow, 24 GB, than why does it take so long to render this small clip.

  • @princealvert

    Because the CPU does the rendering work, and not the ram. I have only one CPU, a Xeon W3520 @ 4.2 GHz. and this is not a small clip to render: Think about the resolution, the big meshes and the number of frames.

  • Omg, this i beautiful! You are really skilled at this.

    Can you remember the mesh settings and what kind of mesh you used?

  • @TheHumanKillerDK

    yo...I updated the description. Thanks for watching. Og glem ikke at se efter nye uploads...der kommer nogen^^

  • @DragonsSpirit Haha, vidste ikke du var dansker :D

    Har kigget alle dine uploads igennem, du er satme dygtig!

    Tak for info, vil da lige test det hurtigt :)

  • @TheHumanKillerDK

    Jeg er heller ikke dansker...det der med Tyskland er helt rigtigt. Men: Dansk boernehave, danks skolesystem...No regrets :D

  • how many GB of ram does your computer have

  • @princealvert

    24GB but thats not needed to do certainly this simulation/render.

  • cool

  • 0.26 = Marmelade

  • i dont get it

  • @imsohotnmh69 How??

  • Yep, I agree. This IS awesome! lol

  • I love you for rendering this. This is AWESOME.

  • @anim8ordude

    haha XD

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more