No. Im talking bout radius in the mesh settings. If your emitter is "inserted" to the mesh, you should be able to see it parented to the mesh node and if you klick on that "copy" of the emitter you will see some settings. Like radius.
Im not so sure that would make it any better. The instructions a CPU can run are more complex and efficient than what a GPU can do in many cases, also my CPU has access to 24GB of memory. I think for a render like this one, where the meshes become bery big in some frames, a GPU is not the best choice. But I would LOVE to try it out^^ I have only a single GTX 470 in use currently...nice card but it cannot handle most of my stuff in octane. And i can NOT afford 4x GTX580 or 480.
"fast" is a really relative word^^ Your CPU would do a good job on this one. But if you want to render other stuff with more detail, size and everything that explodes rendertime (refraction, reflection, blur), then you may find it slow. Just like any other CPU ;-)
That depends alot on the application. GPUs due to their heavy parallelism can do simple jobs very fast and outperform any CPU, but at the same time their processing cores are rather simple. A CPU can execute very complex tasks which makes it more efficient again and thus it is shit faster in any application if you go core vs core @ same MHz. Also, a GPU only has acces to very low GB of memory. No 24GB+ like on CPU. Which is why I render on CPU, my stuff would never fit on a graphicscard
@DragonsSpirit I'm thinking to start on this project, it would be very complex and hard. And i'll be learning while i do it. Basically visualized motion-capture, and bind it to the skeleton of a model, then using FaceWare, act the face expressions. It would be an action scene, so im thinking to do this really crazy thing which i would make 3D gun props from water using RealFlow, and shooting water bullets xD Nuke for tracking/composting.
Also...when I look at the pricing of those badass GPUs....if I had the money to get 4 of them, that means I also have to get an SR2 board, and that means I can shit money, because then I also need at least 2 PSUs to make sure it will run 24/7 for some years. Of course enough memory is essential then...and two xeon CPUs. I tell you: If I had the money, I would get 2 6-core CPUs on that board and overclock them, instead of spending almost 3K on GPUs which dont help me simulate in RF
@DragonsSpirit even with a quadro 6000 u couldnt render that because the 6gb vram of the card would never be enough for those billions of polygones...
Because F1 people spend fortunes on racing cars just to smoke the same roads x times in a row without getting anywhere at all. Seriously...some people think the PC was meant to be a replacement for life, social stuff and games. Other had work to do and made it a tool. At some point your skills are no longer the only defining attribute to get your work done and thats where your tools come in. shitty machine --> shitty work. Or great work in shitty time. Or not even one of both.
Driving can be an art, simulation can be an art. Hard work over time to accomplish skill. Art. I cant believe that "making millions" defines to you what skill or art is and what is not. Too many people do. I dont know much about F1 and my example is pretty much respectless and simplified...just as your comment. I respect people who like F1 or are part of it...does not make me a fan but I hope you get the point.
btw I think this aint goin anywhere so pls stop posting like that
Depends on WHAT you render. Dont forget the network bottleneck you may have with a cluster. If you deal with 10GB+ per frame you will reconsider the network approach because it gets pretty expensive to have a 10Gbit network up and running for 3 machines + Raid. Also consider power usage. 3 Machines totally smoke 1 in terms of power draw. And RealFlow (the simulation software used here) cannot run distributed. Same for Naiad...currently. For R&D/shading with fluids, local power rules.
@PreVaylMusic SLI does nothing for computational purposes, it's only for sharing the framebuffer. Plus, the GTX series is not optimized for double-precision FLOPS. A better choice would be the Quadro series
High did you use a fluid domain or did you use particle fluids in realflow? How did you create the cylinder of particles at the start, I can only create such object in a fluid domain.
Because the CPU does the rendering work, and not the ram. I have only one CPU, a Xeon W3520 @ 4.2 GHz. and this is not a small clip to render: Think about the resolution, the big meshes and the number of frames.
This looks more like JELLY WATER
CookiezEater 1 week ago
1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 particles xD
ichbinluca67 3 weeks ago
that would have taken my computer a year to render, lol
MrFpsBaby 1 month ago
como avalo meu RealFlow original?
dvranimation 2 months ago
0:17 - Do you believe in God? :)))
cristianfrunza 2 months ago
145 hours? no turning off of computer? 0_0
arclpa08 2 months ago
amazing
MrSuspective 2 months ago
Bro, do you mean by radius on the emitter the settings in the display settings for size? Also, for the resolution what was it if I may ask?
CmptrGmr 2 months ago
@CmptrGmr
No. Im talking bout radius in the mesh settings. If your emitter is "inserted" to the mesh, you should be able to see it parented to the mesh node and if you klick on that "copy" of the emitter you will see some settings. Like radius.
good luck :)
DragonsSpirit 2 months ago
@DragonsSpirit Ya I found it after I asked the question. Thanks for a fast response though.
CmptrGmr 2 months ago
looks great
heidaz 2 months ago
not chaotic enough for the realistic aspect, but really fuckin' cool anyway.
imalwayswatchingu00 2 months ago
holy shit :O
AN ARROW CAME OUT OF MY KNEE
Alililele 2 months ago
blood?
thecacaowner 2 months ago
omg?
thecacaowner 2 months ago
Fanta??
fransamson 2 months ago
Ma ma mia Indeed.
TobbyDaDog 2 months ago
mmmmm jelly !
wk360 3 months ago
145 hours thats like a whole week,
freelancergin 3 months ago
"Rendertime over 145 hours for this sequence" What makes you dedicate that much time for a rendition?
therealJayRoe 3 months ago
My dual core died just showing this to me. :/
legalizeshemp420 3 months ago
are u a wizard?
Nelekochara 3 months ago
Imagine that in the future this could be done in realtime! Its only a matter of time my guess 15 years from now.
ParanormalEnities 3 months ago
Orange Juice
xXl3lackyXx 3 months ago
thumbs up if u watched this on ORIGINAL!
FuccA555 3 months ago
Fake. I mean real. I mean... wait... what?
sockschappercat 3 months ago
So if i have 100 in resolution? does it get mega super hd?
ZpeczerN 3 months ago
its either SLOOOW MOOOOTIOOON
or SOOOOO BIIIIG!
TheSputniKSpace 4 months ago
It's funny because when I saw your animation, i shit myself the same way
WheezyMasta 4 months ago
that looked sooooo real
Reed12223 4 months ago
That's just unbelievably awesome.
TheGuyWithTheSniper 4 months ago
why at 1080p does it still look like shit...im callin' uprez haha
lincolnsmithtbp 4 months ago
looks quite epic
managarm1349 4 months ago
Someone on youtube FINALLY gets their liquid to look like water... and they make it orange. God damn it.
HeatherC19 4 months ago
What program is that?
FranciscoMartins21 5 months ago
@FranciscoMartins21 realflow
Gtorres12PS3 4 months ago
@Gtorres12PS3 is it a seperate program or a add on
kimi450 4 months ago
@kimi450 u use the program to do this but you can add it onto cinema 4d so both
Gtorres12PS3 4 months ago
@Gtorres12PS3 thx
kimi450 4 months ago
Wow thats awessome!!! Imagine you on the middle of this splash!!!
TheOsFoda 5 months ago
*splash*
AwesomeRudi51 5 months ago
IRON CROSS! 0:19
Speed1Killer1 5 months ago in playlist Weitere Videos von DragonsSpirit
what was your rendersoftware?
killedbymonkeys 5 months ago
very appetizing material!
nhnifong 5 months ago
I want to drink it :P
Georgiataou 5 months ago
Time of render: Arnold Schwarzenegger
ZzRvXzZ 6 months ago
Wow, this looks so real, the shader is AWESOME
drakenlorde 6 months ago
this shit is wild.
S0ulR33per 6 months ago
this looks like........ i dont know, but amazing!
utube8user8 6 months ago
That looks so delicious.
AJennyPenny 6 months ago
:16 Religious imagery! But yea this was really nice good job
devilswarden 7 months ago
como haces para tener tantas particulas a mi maximo me salen 200000 particulas ??
tirano5000 7 months ago
Can you render air in Realflow?
Allexxx96Reloaded 7 months ago
I make YouTube Custom Backgrounds and Custom Intros for your Channels! I only charge 5$ for Each. So Hit me up if you want Something made. Thanks
Tis4Tony 10 months ago
OMG you need Octane Render with a few GTX 480 or higher i suggest dual sli at least
PreVaylMusic 11 months ago
@PreVaylMusic
Im not so sure that would make it any better. The instructions a CPU can run are more complex and efficient than what a GPU can do in many cases, also my CPU has access to 24GB of memory. I think for a render like this one, where the meshes become bery big in some frames, a GPU is not the best choice. But I would LOVE to try it out^^ I have only a single GTX 470 in use currently...nice card but it cannot handle most of my stuff in octane. And i can NOT afford 4x GTX580 or 480.
DragonsSpirit 11 months ago
@DragonsSpirit looks so great and real. !! i'll be having a i7 2600k @4.5GHz, GTX 570 would this be enough to render fast on 720p?
AiDz0r 9 months ago
@AiDz0r
"fast" is a really relative word^^ Your CPU would do a good job on this one. But if you want to render other stuff with more detail, size and everything that explodes rendertime (refraction, reflection, blur), then you may find it slow. Just like any other CPU ;-)
DragonsSpirit 9 months ago
@DragonsSpirit xD i see, do you render with CPU or GPU, i'm not quiet sure. I heard GPU would be faster?
AiDz0r 9 months ago
@AiDz0r
That depends alot on the application. GPUs due to their heavy parallelism can do simple jobs very fast and outperform any CPU, but at the same time their processing cores are rather simple. A CPU can execute very complex tasks which makes it more efficient again and thus it is shit faster in any application if you go core vs core @ same MHz. Also, a GPU only has acces to very low GB of memory. No 24GB+ like on CPU. Which is why I render on CPU, my stuff would never fit on a graphicscard
DragonsSpirit 9 months ago
@DragonsSpirit Can you render using both?! CPU + GPU ?!
AiDz0r 9 months ago
WTF I JUST REALIZED YOUTUBE DOES "ORIGINAL" ?!? WTFF HOW DO YOU DO THAT?!
AiDz0r 9 months ago
@DragonsSpirit I'm thinking to start on this project, it would be very complex and hard. And i'll be learning while i do it. Basically visualized motion-capture, and bind it to the skeleton of a model, then using FaceWare, act the face expressions. It would be an action scene, so im thinking to do this really crazy thing which i would make 3D gun props from water using RealFlow, and shooting water bullets xD Nuke for tracking/composting.
AiDz0r 9 months ago
@PreVaylMusic
Also...when I look at the pricing of those badass GPUs....if I had the money to get 4 of them, that means I also have to get an SR2 board, and that means I can shit money, because then I also need at least 2 PSUs to make sure it will run 24/7 for some years. Of course enough memory is essential then...and two xeon CPUs. I tell you: If I had the money, I would get 2 6-core CPUs on that board and overclock them, instead of spending almost 3K on GPUs which dont help me simulate in RF
DragonsSpirit 11 months ago 17
@DragonsSpirit Great idea! :D
EVGA Classified SR-2
A LOT OF RAM (dont remember maximum ram on that mobo)
and dual Xeons with 6 cores each :3
LifeRunner4000 7 months ago
@DragonsSpirit
BigO from Origin PC suits your need.
DominixT 4 months ago
@DragonsSpirit even with a quadro 6000 u couldnt render that because the 6gb vram of the card would never be enough for those billions of polygones...
MrCGangsta 3 months ago
@DragonsSpirit Soon you will not even need a good PC to do any visuals, it will all be unlimited.
thewaysh 3 months ago
@DragonsSpirit I don't even get the point of spending a fortune on a computer because you wanna simulate slime?
TheGnuff 3 months ago
@TheGnuff
Because F1 people spend fortunes on racing cars just to smoke the same roads x times in a row without getting anywhere at all. Seriously...some people think the PC was meant to be a replacement for life, social stuff and games. Other had work to do and made it a tool. At some point your skills are no longer the only defining attribute to get your work done and thats where your tools come in. shitty machine --> shitty work. Or great work in shitty time. Or not even one of both.
DragonsSpirit 3 months ago
@DragonsSpirit I can't believe you compared professional F1 drivers who make millions to simulating water in a box.
TheGnuff 3 months ago
@TheGnuff
Driving can be an art, simulation can be an art. Hard work over time to accomplish skill. Art. I cant believe that "making millions" defines to you what skill or art is and what is not. Too many people do. I dont know much about F1 and my example is pretty much respectless and simplified...just as your comment. I respect people who like F1 or are part of it...does not make me a fan but I hope you get the point.
btw I think this aint goin anywhere so pls stop posting like that
DragonsSpirit 3 months ago
@DragonsSpirit No I don't think this is going anywhere either, it's like convinging a vegan that bacon gives you afterlife.
TheGnuff 3 months ago
@DragonsSpirit it is better to have several mid range PC connected each other instead of 1 big
for example take 3~4 1055t on 970A mobo with 2 HD 6790 and 4X4Go ram and it would be cheaper and faster for rendering than sr2 with xeon and firepro
Nagby3 3 months ago
@Nagby3
Depends on WHAT you render. Dont forget the network bottleneck you may have with a cluster. If you deal with 10GB+ per frame you will reconsider the network approach because it gets pretty expensive to have a 10Gbit network up and running for 3 machines + Raid. Also consider power usage. 3 Machines totally smoke 1 in terms of power draw. And RealFlow (the simulation software used here) cannot run distributed. Same for Naiad...currently. For R&D/shading with fluids, local power rules.
DragonsSpirit 3 months ago
@DragonsSpirit you can run 1/3 of the video on each PCs and i think 3x1055t+6x6790 doesn't need a lot more power than 2xXeon+4xfirepro/tesla
Nagby3 3 months ago
@PreVaylMusic SLI does nothing for computational purposes, it's only for sharing the framebuffer. Plus, the GTX series is not optimized for double-precision FLOPS. A better choice would be the Quadro series
froanas 6 months ago
@PreVaylMusic lol GTX 480 suck dude
Cortake 6 months ago
what is your renderer? if its renderkit, is there a renderkit for x32 or x86 3D studio max?
137bff 1 year ago
@137bff
I use Cinema 4D r11.5 for all my rendering currently. Never used renderkit...
DragonsSpirit 1 year ago
High did you use a fluid domain or did you use particle fluids in realflow? How did you create the cylinder of particles at the start, I can only create such object in a fluid domain.
hugynator 1 year ago
thats the best color or shader i have EVER seen!
realflow100 1 year ago 27
wow, 24 GB, than why does it take so long to render this small clip.
princealvert 1 year ago
@princealvert
Because the CPU does the rendering work, and not the ram. I have only one CPU, a Xeon W3520 @ 4.2 GHz. and this is not a small clip to render: Think about the resolution, the big meshes and the number of frames.
DragonsSpirit 1 year ago
Omg, this i beautiful! You are really skilled at this.
Can you remember the mesh settings and what kind of mesh you used?
TheHumanKillerDK 1 year ago
@TheHumanKillerDK
yo...I updated the description. Thanks for watching. Og glem ikke at se efter nye uploads...der kommer nogen^^
DragonsSpirit 1 year ago
@DragonsSpirit Haha, vidste ikke du var dansker :D
Har kigget alle dine uploads igennem, du er satme dygtig!
Tak for info, vil da lige test det hurtigt :)
TheHumanKillerDK 1 year ago
@TheHumanKillerDK
Jeg er heller ikke dansker...det der med Tyskland er helt rigtigt. Men: Dansk boernehave, danks skolesystem...No regrets :D
DragonsSpirit 1 year ago
how many GB of ram does your computer have
princealvert 1 year ago
@princealvert
24GB but thats not needed to do certainly this simulation/render.
DragonsSpirit 1 year ago
cool
princealvert 1 year ago
0.26 = Marmelade
thewinna00 1 year ago
i dont get it
imsohotnmh69 1 year ago
@imsohotnmh69 How??
enjoiskate11 1 year ago
Yep, I agree. This IS awesome! lol
Slance1Himself 1 year ago
I love you for rendering this. This is AWESOME.
anim8ordude 1 year ago
@anim8ordude
haha XD
DragonsSpirit 1 year ago