Added: 5 years ago
From: ColonelDan
Views: 76,067
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (178)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 50th anniversary of the movie this year...and there's a lot of info on the internet about the real T.E. Lawrence. Look for T.E. Lawrence Studies, T.E. Lawrence Society, and Clio Visualizing History--this site has a video and a ton of photos (the real T.E. was a good-looking guy!...still controversial though, even 95 years after Aqaba).

  • @RichardElden

    You are rubbish as a film critic. This is the best film ever made!

  • @RichardElden Like all major blockbusters today, there are so many nationalities involved it's debatable as to which country it belongs, if any.

    Columbia distributed the film and owned the rights but it was financed through Horizon Pictures (a British company run by American Sam Spiegel). The script was written by Robert Bolt, an Englishman. Nearly all the cast and crew were British. The director, David Lean, was English. The music was by Maurice Jarre, a Frenchman. So which country made it?

  • How accurate the portrayal of Lawrence is in this film is irrelevant- films from this era were very rarely concerned with historical accuracy.

    A complex man in real life, the interpretation of him in this film is equally so, and that's what's the most interesting to watch. Twice in the film, we see Lawrence urging Allenby to hand over the mission to somebody else- despite the fact that, in many ways, the desert was clearly where Lawrence felt most at home.

  • Such a wonderful movie - two great actors - Hawkins was classic.

  • Why would a person interested in things like Arabia itself be so much into things like women and gah, sex?

  • @Losrandir Lawrence claimed to be asexual, though some modern scholars believe that he was gay. He didn't care about women, which is why not one woman appears in the movie.

  • @hobo8675309 Correct.

  • @hobo8675309 The fact that the story is set during world wars 1 and 2, concerning British naval officers and Saudi, bedouin soldiers, doesn't hurt either.

  • auf Lawrence kommt es nict mehr an.Die Moslems wissen was für dreckige Spiele

    die Ungläubigen gemacht haben.das alles ist Vergangenheit.

    in Zukunft wird es anders sein.Die Türken lieben Araber,warum?schon weilMekka dort ist ihr verfuckten Unruhestifter.Bald wird das Islam über die ganze Welt leuchten,es nützt nichts mehr das die Israelis oder Westmächte dreckige Spiele spielen.Alle wissen wer Lügt .Tja lawence ist Vergangenheit ,deeeeer Motherfucker der Zeiten war er,er fickte Kamele

  • arabs are you proud of yourself you followed an ardent zionist called as lawrence of arabia.this a fact printed in independent journal, british resources. he is a homosexual zionist liar that helped jews to get israel.

  • @Igotangry Out of sheer curiosity is this the first time you've heard of the man?

  • not many men have a destiny .it`s a terrible thing for a man to flunk it if he has/ but i´m gonna give them Damascus /They`ll come for me What do we see?Someone who is manipulated by a general to do what he wants him to do?Someone who cant resist playing the hero once more?A man wih a destiny he has got to fullfill?Or just someone"half mad" Is it written or nothing is written?So everything here is a truth and a lie at the same time.Brilliant

  • Comment removed

  • does he not realize he's been shot in the back

  • Lawrence was a self publicist on a massive scale. Most of the real spade work in the Middle East campaign was done by Allenby’s regulars. An intermittent number of just 6,000 Bedouins harassed Turkish lines. Their motivation – looting and lucre, rather than Arab nationalism (a romanticism elevated by Lawrence). Lawrence was really the dynamite man and janus face go between. His claims about his legendary deep penetration desert warfare tactics are in the main canards.

  • Lawrence was evidently a repressed homosexual. He never showed any serious interest in women; certainly nothing like he did for Arab boys. He even admitted the female form had no attraction for him. But his sexuality probably took the confluence of masochistic ritual practices in which he experienced release by expiating latent guilt through acts physical violence.

  • godamn it! I wanted to see it carry on into the next scene soo badly!

    no choice but to put it on and watch it all the way through now :P

  • "The best of them won't come for money, they'll come for me!"

    LAWRENCE LAWRENCE LAWRENCE

  • "manifested" him? There's so many things wrong with your attempted insult that I won't even counter it. ;)

  • The Brits do it best! The greatest of all the epics!

  • My favorite scene from the greatest movie ever created!

  • Seriously?

    Do you post just to troll and aggravate people? Or perhaps just to demonstrate to us all how foolish you are acting. T.E. Lawrence was a great man, and his name will never be forgotten. Whether he was homosexual or not doesn't matter...you're just being a bigot.

  • @EvangelineSky

    right on!

  • @EvangelineSky he wasnt a homosexual, just the thought of sexuality disgusted him

  • @kkkiiinnnggg222

    I know, I never said he was. But IF he was, it would not detract from his character. That's all I was saying.

  • @EvangelineSky :D

    You're a doll.

  • david lean is so great

    the last three seconds of this clip, you can already hear people shouting "lawrence" in the next scene

    and look at him posing in front of that picture to deliver the big line (is it by william blake?)

    eveything is deliberate with david lean

  • T.E Lawrence,

    beautiful Englishman,

  • As you do.

  • hurensohn lawrence

  • Peter O'Toole is SOOOO BRILLIANT

  • David Lean!!!

  • adding to prv comment.The english dained in abt 150 yrs over 2000 billion pnds from India.they extorted rapaciousltand a hell of a lot more than 6 mil ppl starved to death as a DIRECT result(and please dont think i am in any way belittling the scale and terribleness of the holocaust which is of course one of the most horrible and shameful chapters in human history.)I am just saying that what the british did in India which was basically suck the life out of an entire nation is in the same bracket

  • Comment removed

  • why shd he regret it?If he had a good life in britain,met decent ppl etc.There is no reason whatsoevr for him to regret anything.I wasnt sain england s a lousy place or that all englishmen were awful people i was merely arguing that the british estb in India committed a lot of wanton and avoidable crimes and that while that may today be forgiven it certainly should not be forgotten.Also.Ask ur dad abt life in India,Im sure he has memmories worth sharing anyone who has evr lived in India does

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Dude you can copy paste all the quotes you want but the point is that I am not saying there were no good men among the british in India or that they didnt do something to help reform society but you are missing the bgger pictur of what the british as a unit and as induviduals did to India

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • you are quite right,William Bentinck who was gov-gen at the time was a far sighted and decent man and worked with some of the great Indians of the time to both abolish sati and encourage education for girls.I am not denying any of this, and neither am i claiming that Indian cultures or practices ar without flaws,many massive flaws like all cultures.

  • adamswamy is an ignorant fool with a complex.1st of all any sane p'son can see that gunning down 400 unarmed ppl(more than 1/2 of whom were women and children) who were simply at a public speech in a place where it was not unlawful to assemble IS a big deal no matter how big the population.secondly did you know that in amritsar for almost a yr there were daily incidents of publis beatings often to death of 7/8 yr ld kids not by ignorant mobs but bythe police on orders from brit officrs.

  • what you need to get to grips with is the fact that no one outside india gives a damn - you're just boring us instead of making an interesting comment about a great film. it wouldn't be so bad if the film was set in bloody india! the british raj did some bad things - get over it. i don't hear you complaining about how unpleasant some of the previous rulers were - and think yourself lucky india wasn't ruled by the Belgians or Germans instead. Then india would have been really screwed lol.

  • oh and abt your comment abt the "piss weak" princely states that were there bfr you(as tho it was personally YOU,I suppose we indians shd just be thankful it wasnt a cunt like you)turned up!?!?!?!Ya sure the Mughal Empire sure was a piss weak princely state,seeing as it only had abt 6 million men in its army and ruled an empire just 26 times the size of that rainy grey shithole you call a country.

  • How does this movie end, too long, I fell asleep!!!

  • Becasue it's a epic.

  • The only way America gets "her ass kicked" is when she allows it to happen.... take us out of the loop in the 20th century and what do you have. world anarcy. But thats not important here. If anyway wishes to gain a great deal on knowledge about the Middle East, suggest you read, Seven Pillars of Wisdom...by T.E.L. of course...(ps) your welcome

  • From the Just So's You Know Dept: When Peter O'Toole says, "You can tell the politicians to burn their bit of paper now," that was a line O'Toole re-recorded 25+ years later for the 1989 restoration of LOA (for some reason the line was deleted, and although the footage still existed, the soundtrack for it didn't).

  • the british are ok,truse they enslaved half the world and committed outrages that would make a nazi go "ohh well done!!",but still that was a long time ago and mst brutishers nowadays are massive pansies so its no fun hating them anyway.

  • hasha1234-what "outrages" that would make the nazis go "oh well"? Yep, there were incidents like Amritsar in 1919( 400 killed and about 1200 wounded out of a population of about 300 million - big deal)-I don't recall the British exterminating 6 million people in concentration camps like the Nazis did - or committing the genocide against the natives such as was carried out by the U.S. authorities against the native Americans. Think yourself lucky we didn't do that :0P.

  • they exported grain from ireland while millions starved to death. they killed every single native in tasmania.they had the worlds first concentration camps for boers in south africa-need i go on ?

  • Yes please go on-I'm still waiting for "outrages" to make the nazis go "oh well"".Re. the camps - they weren't extermination camps like those used by the nazis - thousands died of disease because of poor accommodation/sanitation, bad planning etc. but to try and compare with the nazi/Auschwitz etc is infantile. Likewise Tasmania - you don't mention that the numbers killed came to c.5000 - some historians say as low as 2K - hardly Belsen. We've not been saints - so what? Who is? Get over it.

  • You idiot just b'cos the nazis were worse bastards than the colonial brits dosent absolve the british, At least most germans regret and arent proud of the things they did..

  • Stop whinging you sad moron - no wonder a small country like England manage to dominate you. You should be grateful we created your country out of the hotch potch of piss weak little princely states that were there before we turned up. Why don't you go back to your former noble customs like suttee - how civilised. If we were so horrible why do we let so many of you live over here? (Biggest mistake we've made). As for us feeling sorry for the greatest Empire in history - go fuck yourself :0).

  • first of all its spelled sati.And seeing as you are an extraordinarily stupid cunt lets just leave it here shall we.I could,as usual tear down all your poorly consturcted at best imbecilic at worst, arguements but frankly its all got a bit tedious and i can't wait to never see your fucking name again.SO PLEASE, PLEASE just don't reply to this comment.

  • Comment removed

  • good for you! i just wish all the ones that don't like us did that! it would be a much happier country :0)

  • Comment removed

  • farmerinchico - i shared an apartment for a couple of years with an asian friend and we got on fine. He still spoke gujerati with his family, did the usual cultural stuff with them etc. but he was pro English and fitted in with the majority. he didn't go on about how awful the whites were etc. The people i despise are those who constantly whinge about british customs -no one puts a gun to your head and makes you live here-if you don't like it, pack your bags and leave. problem solved :0).

  • Comment removed

  • Whatever.

    The sun set on the British Empire long ago, no matter how you slice it.. funny how you people always forget that when you criticize the U.S.

    The UK is a shadow of her former self. Deal with it.

  • The British are a bunch of HAS-BEENS and no longer the dominant superpower they were before the 20th century.

    This is indisputable - pointing out problems in US foreign policy isn't going to change any of that...

  • Brits are such snobs... you forget how badly England got her ass whipped with the decline of the British Empire..

    .. Burma.. Singapore.. Hong Kong.. the Suez Canal.. Malta.. Ghana.. Sierra Leone.. Nigeria... India... among others...

    Pwned!

  • dpludwig - Why don't you just say you don't like the British and get it over with instead of droning on and on, boring the shit out of the rest of us? We had our glory days and now they're gone - who cares? And don't forget that what happened to us will happen to you. The U.S. is dominant for now but the Chinese will overtake you in 30 years and they'll take the piss out of you over how you lost your status. Its the way of the world, no one power stays top forever - get over it.

  • wow .. that was a long winded and incoherent rant

    btw i'm not american. why is it that when someone points out the decline of the british empire that someone must be american?

    you've obviously got a chip on their shoulder lol

  • dpludwig - no more long winded and incoherent a rant and you provided. And I assumed you were American because of little things like the fact you have the Stars and Stripes on your profile representing your nationality. Sorry if that's seems such a wild assumption for me to make.

  • You dont need to reply to people like that. There'll always be assholes in this world.

  • this is a great film

    but edward saids orientalism is still the truth while this is fantasy

  • you got yor ass kicked in korea an vietnam

  • Arabs has been slaves of western since Lawrence rescued them from Ottoman Empire ! Well done Arabs! Have much fun of being a slave !

  • Being a slave is so not fun, I'll give you that.

  • super comment !!!!

  • At the end of the scene Lawrence stands in front of a painting depicting Phaethon, the son of Helios, falling out of the solar chariot, symbolising Lawrence's own hubris and his approaching nemesis.

  • Outstanding perspective.

  • brilliant scene.

  • Awesome film. It's really quite a career when one can say of a director that Doctor Zhivago was not his best film. David Lean is the directorial counterpart to Lawrence Olivier, the greatest Briton in modern history.

  • "They'll come for me"

  • I hope I meet Peter Otoole someday he was amazing in this film.

  • I typed "Lawrence of Arabia" in youtube's search engine just to see if this clip would come up. Thanks to whomever posted this clip. I love this movie and some of the quotes from it really get me in the deepest sense... "Moses was a prophet, and beloved of god;" "He said there was gold here and he lied, he is not perfect," etc, etc, etc. Not to mention the music. Thanks for the post

  • I typed "Lawrence of Arabia" into youtube's search just to see if this quote would come up. Whoever posted this clip has restored my faith in humanity that somebody "gets it" What a great movie with stirring dialogue just like this! Thanks again!

  • not out of british self-interest again.

  • Not only did you lose this war but you also your Empire. Although I think the Battle of Lepanto is your greatest defeat. You guys suck lol.

  • I'll come for you baby ;) only brave men turn me on

  • I though that the comments were supposed to be about this scene of this amazing movie. Historical differences should not be discussed, like someone said before, in a couple of sentences.

    BTW, thanks ColonelDan, perhaps you could upload one of the most amusing parts of the movie which is the first meeting between Auda abu Tayi and Sherif Ali.

  • Totally agree about all the other bullshit mate... and what a movie!!!

  • ergunriza my mate, u proclaim people uneducated and yet u manage 2 write arab history in couple of sentences?Sure many people here just go on some stpid adress on net and read a couple of sentences and act smart,but dont act educated about this when ure not.

  • Of wich arabs are u talkin about?;Jordan, Kuvait, Libanon, Maroko, Oman, Katar, Saudia, Sudan, Siria, Tunis, UAE, Jemen, i Palestina?Or beduins,Copts, Hamits, Berbers?A nobel prize man once said There is nothing more dangerous but a man that read one book.

  • does that include white american fundamentalist nuts and mad mullahs. of course neither really read their respective books they just act on the worst parts of them

  • The Arabs need the British to lead them.

  • for their own independence, zimbabwe33, not for british self-interest.

  • Thats what they did the first time Segits. Independance. Although recently the West has messed the Arabs about, actualy started with US oil contractos in 1938.

  • Eid Mubarak ! Dear brothers, Arabs made big mistakes but now they have got the opportunity to improve it.We urgently need a new Ottoman Empire in the World but not to take revenge but rather to spread peace and bring stability in today's Islamic-World.

  • i love dogs.

  • charming. would love to be friends with a high-quality chap like yourself.

  • Airboy, you don't even know where his grave is. Come to Old Briny and get yourself an education.

  • Dear uneducated people,

    Ottoman Empire(The Turks)came to Arabia after they had rescued Arabs from crusades! But the ungreatful Arabs are the biggest traitor in the Islamic history because the most valuable time of islam was during the Ottoman Empire. They sold and stabed their obvious brothers just for money and since then they have been living as slaves of western! Well done Arabs, have still much fun of being slave !

  • Turks did not "rescue" the Arabs. What is an "Arab" anyway? "They" are not a monolith. The Turks did bring stability to the Middle East, but they made a big mistake when they attacked Europa. They should have stayed put...

  • my friend you're insulting a whole pop. for the fact that the west overcome the Ottoman Empire & not the Arabs..actually people in Mosul in Iraq even refused to be part of a Brittish colony & wanted to join Turkey cause they're muslims & this is actually documented..but ofcourse Arabs wanted to have their independency neither belonging to Ottomans or Westerners..& please don't insult Arabs in general..personally I like Turks & Turkey...Salam & Eid Mubarak

  • Its funny though how british talk actually convinced many turks that the ottoman army in arab lands was taken down by 5,000 ppl, barely trained for combat.

  • Hussein bin Ali, the Sharif of Mecca was born in Istanbul, but he was not Turkish...he was an Arab, hence "Arab Revolt" you simpleton...

  • doranos is right, you people have no idea about being turkish...the turkish have no identity problem! we know who we are, its just a way of the foreign people to say "eeew, turkish...". this is all because of the secret grudge against the turkish after the first world war. please, stop calling turks racists.

  • its not matter what they say nor they do..we have never lost our independence in history and it will not happen in the future.they have invaded my country with crusaders or alliance forces(france,england,russia aka armenia,greece at same time!) but all of them became feeds of aegean fishes.

  • Look. what im trying to say is that you guys (modern day turks) are actually decended of the byzantuim empire more than the turkic people of turkistan and kazakhstan. The ottoman empire was ideologically and on the politics of it built on an arab base (goverment, relegion, etc). While the populus was leaning more towards byzantuim. But u have to admit that turkey had a dark time. When the young turks first seized power.

  • And by the way, Arabs and I dont hate turks. On the contrary we consider turks the closest people to us. Although there were massacres against maronites and syriacs (Arab christians) we never ran off to france or anyone else so they would attack turkey. You should also know my best friend is from turkey and there are alot of arab turks where im from (and yes they tell me they consider themselves both arab and turk)

  • Go to antakya and ask most people what they consider themselves. However, when someone begins to talk about pax-ottomana shit. I cant take it. Its a racist view, and it looks at other cultures and regions in a superior manner (which the ottoman empire didnt know at its time).

  • The sherif of hejaz was an oppurtunist (first pro-ottoman then pro-allies) and nobody sees him as a hero except britian. However you should also know that arabs did revolt in syria, iraq and lebanon before that when there began a procces of turkification and the young turks seized power.

  • also turkish people of ottoman have suffered alot like other peoples of ottoman empire and they have rebelled against ottoman too but only difference of turks was when they saw christian soldiers sacking country and killing ottoman soldiers they didnt helped "neo-crusaders" but they fought against them.

  • Well....again you know that the revolution against the turks was before the british came. There was a war between arabs and ottoman soldiers in syria and lebanon, when the sherif (ottoman governer of hejaz) saw this. He contacted the british embassy and managed this (revolt in the movie). He took over arab lands with british help. Do you understand now??? This movie is just exagerating the sherif!

  • The reason that the arabs revolted was because of the turkification of the ottoman empire by the CUP. first there was negatiotion for arab countries and turkey to become one binational state but the cup rejected and the war started. BTW, the sherif of hejaz was turkish. And my point about ethnicity is that turks of tukey are not alien people that came from the east but part of the middle east and eastern mideterinian. So, dont act like arab, greek and turks are completly different.

  • okay i know what you trying to say,today there is no "race" as a turkish but culture,in kazakhstan and other turkic states people are generally descendant of "mongolians" and in turkey geneticaly people are descendant of "hitites" and "troyans" (local people of anatolia hellenized by byzantium) even atatürk(the man who has blue eyes,blonde hair,non turkic traits)said that being turkish is matter of culture.

  • im not racist! you've been going on and on about my people and now you're calling me a racist. and now you say the turks were nomaddic asian people (not like 10 mins ago you said the turks were descendant of greeks). well at least you're getting warmer ill give you that. please stop acting like you're right. the seconds you are talking about are actually centuries.

  • we dont have identity problem we are just simply "turks"thats others who has this problem.other nations dont get it and saying every time that we are greeks etc.if we are greeks you are camels if bloodline important for you..maybe im descendant of a greek but im speakin in turkish language and my cultre is turkish JUST GET IT FOOL AND IM PROUD OF THIS...its not my identity problem thats you problem about your comprehension

  • One second arabs are traitors to islam and the ottoman empire (allies of the west) the next they are terrorists and unicivlized people behind the west. THis is exactly the identity problem im talking about. And yes you dumbass, original turks were nomaddic asian people. They look nothing like the ppl in turkey today. Anyways we are talking about states here not a rogue terrorist organization, which just shows your collectivist racism.

  • just get it camel..im not turkish by looking im turkish by my culture and im proud of not being terrorist camel.

  • Wow....you just said blood lines are not important to you then you commented that arabs are sons of camels and crusaders. You are just a facist man. I just hate the facism you guys have, the pax-ottomana mentality. and by you i mean the guys commenting. Turkey has an identity problem which makes the ppl there insecure about their history and culture. i liked many parts of the ottoman empire except the beggining and the end when they killed everyone.

  • i never liked amavids who has forced our people to be muslim,killed everybody in the name of islam.

  • even if arabs were the base of the ottoman empire (which they were absolutely not the "base") it doesnt mean the turks are a mix of greeks and arabs? are you crazy? so what happens even if we help israel? you arabs basically kill innocent people for stupid reasons like "not being educated enough" or "god chose us to kill the innocent".... hey was your uncle a professional suicide bomber (nothing personal mate)

  • Yeah...

  • Look dumbass arab civilization is the one the ottoman empire was built upon. And yes Wikipedia is there...Just look at it. Ottomans did not control arab lands like britian controlled its colonies. THe sherif himself was the ottoman governor of hejaz who turned against them.

  • And yes....most the turks of turkey today are a mix of greeks, other europeans and arabs. They just speak turkish and are muslims.anyways just keep kissing europes ass for their approval.

  • By the way....dont take your historical info from wikipedia. It has alot of bias and many times articles conflict with each other.

  • its better than sellin our women and patrol to american like you are doin right now...btw im not racist as you and bloodline is not important for me!!linguistics and culture is most important thing for us(turks)

  • What are you talking about?? turkey is more pro-american than anybody else in the middle east! They are part of NATO godamit. They helped israel more than anyone else! THe base of ottoman empire was arab and nobody can deny it although they were influenced by the byzantine and persian culture.

  • ottoman been arabized(cursed) after arablover caliphate sultan selim thats why ottoman empire fall before that curse we were attached to our turkic roots with osman bey so we were in rise.we are tryin to get rid of this thing now.

  • and about america we say that we are strategic partner of america but thats a lie!thats the turks who have denied to let americans to be partner for invading iraq by turkish court and this year turkish soldiers will attack to iraq cause american feedin pkk(aka babykillers)

  • ottoman EMPIRE built upon all the cultures around its geographie because its multicultural empire,it has been influenced by turkish,greek,european,arabian­,iranian even indian cultures because its AN EMPIRE WITH PLURAL NATIONS

  • yea that is true, the turks of turkey today are actually arabs, greeks and other europeans. Real turks are asian looking.

  • bad flim

  • they have backstabbed us(turks).look at them now!!!

  • Turks are idiots, including you. Killed the armenians, the syriacs, the maronite, the arabs, the bulgarians. Its true "Turks only know sodomy and blood"

  • i smell nationalism in the air here.. you can say me idiot but you cant say the same thing for my nation you perfect idiot.. if we are idiots, how could we rule you for centuries from Istanbul? you told me that iam idiot cause your british&americans masters want it from you,, yeh arabs dont kill anybody they are angels!

  • not much stupid as arabs who are killing themselves everyday with suicide bombings.

  • I think anybody who knows anything about history knows that ottomans were very decntirilzed in arab lands. Istanbul was more conerned with fighting europe than governing arab lands. Anyways u are idiots because u dont know that ur not really turkish.

  • go kill yourself you terrorist monkey.we dont give a fuck about arab lands know.your brothers(english aka crusaders)helped you for your independence.have good day in jerusalem and iraq...

  • This is the same T. E. Lawrence that wrote "Seven Pillars of Wisdom" a title that takes tribute to the Musims Five Pillars of Faith...I think he respects Arabs and Islam enough.

  • no he doesnt respect islam.he respects his own country(england) and helps them to colonize it.

  • hmm lets see.. they believed europeans and betrayed us,, so they became british&american colonies.. they arent as free as they were.. ...  .. pax ottomana..

  • Ummm, saudi arabia (where sharif came from) never became a colony. Idiot turk.

  • lol its still colony you gay arab.XD

  • what an idiot ABelieverOfTruth is (the name speaks for itself) Lawrence was far then a racist, he respected the Arab culture and race, read one of his books you fool, he undestand that the Arabs were one of the most power cultures in the world, but he also understood that internal indifferences and arrogant male pride, was making the Arab nation weakwould you like a burger with that chip that you've got on your shoulder. Educate yourself before you speak

  • Oops hey are you sure,, i thoght that it was only a little part of british imperialist politics.. hmm..

  • Yes the cgovernment he worked for was Imperialistic, but the more you read about Lawrance the more you understand about his love for the islamic and arabic culture, even in the film it is mentioned how he does it for the people of the country,but he gets betrayed by a bunch of public school wankers, but to be honest the british people as a whole are constanly lied and betrayed by the class system..take WW1 . is it hard to accept that a non convert could actually be an all right guy....

  • you mean all those betrayal ( for arabs, backstubbing) that encouraged by british agents who wanted better for arabia? or only wanted for better for their own countries,? by the way,, im not something against freedom of arabs, but whole arabs suppose that turks were cruel, how can anybody rule the middle east with cruelness?

  • I hate this fucken movie.Lawrence thinks he is smarter than the Arabs in this movie.I remember that sand scene where he shows Arab how to get someone out of a quick sand.This is an indirect way to say the white guys smarter than the Arab.Fucken racist movie made in the 60's.

  • U are a fucking idiot! Calling LOA a racist film?Lawrence tries to give the country back to the Arabs, u moron, by organizing themselves. And in the end he realizes that he's just one man and that he cant do it. The Arabs have to want to change by themselves, not because Lawrence or anybody tells them so. Im pretty sure u are also against the "cinematic torture and bad guys" on the tv series 24? Go and read a book, moron.

  • what an idiot ABelieverOfTruth is (the name speaks for itself) Lawrence was far then a racist, he respected the Arab culture and race, read one of his books you fool, he undestand that the Arabs were one of the most power cultures in the world, but he also understood that internal indifferences and arrogant male pride, was making the Arab nation weak,would you like a burger with that chip that you've got on your shoulder. Educate yourself before you speak

  • fallout boy 07 is the meat puppets

    introduce the Ryan Seacrest taking over Lt. Commander William Tiberius Riker. Comet. it makes your teeth turn green.

  • finally it's over...autism ,,, the stupid academy awards? how much? they'll be coming for ME Snakes and Arrows Broods of Vipers Try Me quite a lot of money aint whistling Dixie whistler's mother and her mother before that and proud of it wave that flag downey fabric softner cleaner tastes like coffee filter painted, now that's art and absinthe fascist. fek meh aww.
  • Lawrence was Welsh actually

  • somewhere in this scene is a bit of restored footage missing original audio. peter sometimes in the 80s dubbed himself (with a slightly less fey voice, think you can hear it), under lean's supervision. can't remember who did hawkins' voice.

  • Best movie ever!!!111 LOL

  • An amazing film, my favourite. Funny enough- Peter O'Toole, like Pierce Brosnan, isn't actually British at all, but Irish! The screenplay is amazing in this film, not a line wasted, as this scene illustrates perfectly.

  • Agree with you on the script. Even funnier - Richard Harris, Irish Catholic, playing the lead in "Cromwell"

  • um ok *rolls eyes.... anyways that remaids me being that the person before me is a homophobe and ignorant i heard that they had to cut some of peter o'toole's scenes becuz of his being effeminate

  • one of the best parts.

  • we are waiting for another lawrence

  • One of the great movies of all time. What is astonishing was that O'Toole was only 28 when he made this film.

  • My all time favourite movie. This will always be the best movie of all time in my opinion. Second best movie, Goodfellas.

  • thank you

    marvelous

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more