Added: 3 years ago
From: Bushvision
Views: 1,431
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (15)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The bullshit talker in the vid is pretty entertaining.

    The Heartland institute is always good for a laugh when it produces its drivel on global warming.

  • Here are some of Dr. Lehr's credentials: He received the nation’s first Ph.D. in Ground Water Hydrology from the University of Arizona in 1962. After graduate school, he taught at the University of Arizona and The Ohio State. He has testified before Congress on more than three dozen occasions. Lehr has 29 books in print including “The Handbook of Environmental Science Health and Technology.” He is currently Science Dir. of the Heartland Inst., a libertarian think tank.

  • Great summary of key players and motives:

    1. Media - fear and bad news sells

    2. Environmentalists - want to socialize and control the world

    3. Politicians - Need to a create a crisis to fix

    4. UN - Wants world govt (confirmed by draft Copenhagen Treaty), good prediction Jay

    5. Scientists - swayed by billions in govt funding

    6. Capitalists - new opportunity to make a buck

    7. Nuclear industry - self promotion interest

  • The more I listen to this, the harder I laugh. Lehr gets more finge with age.

    It is amusing. Thank god, few people take him seriously.

    I love the lie about "best fit line" for data. Considering that this clown has never crunched data in his life, its understandable that he is unfamiliar with the formulas are used for determining data trends.

    Lehr reminds me of the wild-eyed conspiriacy loonies who babble about 9/11 theories.

  • Let's hear your qualifications

  • Comment removed

  • To hydrogeo56osu - Sounds like a personal vendetta against Mr. Lehr. And hilarious contains only one l

  • Thanks for the spelling correction. Yes I do hate this jerk. He single handedly brought down a wonderful profssional society he was the director of by theft and fraud.

    I also find it outrageous when people in the sciences say stuff just for money.

    Jay is masterful at talking like he is an expert. Jay is unmployed, gets no grants and lives on a dump in Ohio. Jay has never done research and is no scientist. All he ever did was manage an association. In short, he is a lair and actor.

  • First of all, Jay does not live in a dump. He has a beautiful home. You have distorted information and posted it as fact. Apparently, your overwhelming hatred of the man has biased your views and cause you to constantly barrage youtube or any other venue showcasing Jay Lehr with horrid comments. Methinks you sound like a disgruntled employee.

  • court records indicate otherwise Mrs. Lehr. Anyone who lies and distorts facts is worthy of disrespect.

  • I'm not Mrs. Lehr. You are over the top in your bias and there obviously is something personal in your attacks. Tell me who you are if you dare.

  • Comment removed

  • Its hillarious - jay just makes this crap up. BTW - Jay was thrown off the faculty of OSU for incompetence back in the 70s. I walked out of his Hydrogeology 600 course (a grad level course) as he was using USGS publication 2220 as his text book - this is a 100 page pamphlet. Jay wasted our time by talking about himself.

  • I know Lehr personally. First of all he is a fraud and have never worked in the field. All he has done is run an association until he was arrested for fraud and sent to federal prison - yes he is a convicted felon. Lehr is the same as Gore - just a guy who reads other peoples work, twists it to make it marketable and then works real hard to get on TV. He can BS people who are not experts. Scientists laugh at him. He is a bad joke.

  • his scientific arguments are flawed.

    2007 and Jan 2008 being cool was because of a la nina. Temperature has risen since the la nina faded away. So his sunspot claim is rather baseless, it was the la nina, not the lack of sunspots.

    The that warming stopped in 1998 is similarly taking advantage of a strong el nino in that year. And he has the balls to critise others for cherrypicking datapoints?

    And his claim that 1/3 of glaciers are getting smaller, 1/3 bigger is BS

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more