That's a fake. That F4 is a holographic projection masking a Saturn V rocket impacting a balsa wood model of a 200 ton block of concrete, prewired with 750 lbs of C4 plastic explosives to make you think that you are seeing an F4 Phantom impacting a block of concrete from a rocket sled. I know for a fact that 911truthinator is actually Dick Cheney's YouTube user name.
Oh, and since you real "truthers" out there are too dense to know any different, the above comment is SARCASM!
So i am guessing the people in the sky lobby who had the wing of 175 slice straight through it and kill many people almost instantly.. and one Asian lady who managed to survive it and tell her story...
They really dreamed it all.. never really happened.
If i was on this show i would fucking slap this twit!!! Unbelievable!!. WHERE do these fucking cranks come from?? Moreover how does someone become this stupid is the bigger question.
For all you people out there that are saying 911 is fake, or a gov. conspiracy, or whatever. Please shut up. Words cannot describe how stupid you all are.
1. People saw this with their own eyes so video editing is out of the question
2. For the gov. to stage such a event would require so much money, that the people would notice a drop in budget and it would be pointless.
3. Most importantly, you are all idiots.
BTW, skyscrapers are designed to collapse like they did to prevent mass damage.
This is an extremely bad representation to compare 911 planes. First off the planes went directly into the buildings. We didn't see pulverized plane parts go laterally up and down, we seen it go into the building. If you are comparing this to 911 planes, your sadly mistaken on your premise. The planes didn't get pulverized and fall straight to the ground, which in this video demostrates with this particular aircraft. Another 911Truthinator FAIL! Dumb down propagandized fools.
Great vid, Truthinator. Though I would say this doesn't display exactly what would happen with a 757, it shows that a plane would essentially be torn to bits. What many no-planers also forget is that WTC was not a solid wall, it was columns with lots of glass. They also forget that if it were a military plane with a bomb device, it could absolutely penetrate the walls easily.
Well, one thing is for sure.....this plane did not penetrate the concrete block. It disintegrated and what looks like going through, is actually the wings going past the sides
@spacemonk420 you must be one the dumbest, retarded,stupidest twoofer on youtube. you actually think the wtc walls were made of concrete like in this video,
i actually researched the consttruction of the WTC and everything ab6out 9-11 before i made videos and learnt how stupid,crazy,ignorant twoofers really are
watch?v=PhKrirlTw8c
i hope you don't have a car and a car licence and drive on public roads. thats the only thing that scares me about stupid twoofers.
@spacemonk420 So explain to me how a government that can't balance a budget, can't come up with a decent health care plan, couldn't cover up a blow job in the oval office, & couldn't cover up non-exisistant "Wepons Of Mass Destruction" in Iraq about a year or so after 9/11 is able to coordinate a big consipracy with the N.Y.P.D., F.D.N.Y., both liberals & conservatives in both houses of congress, American Airlines, plus thousands of others, & no one is going to talk?
Are you saying that a government as incompetent as the one you describe would be able to defend itself against a group of highly motivated criminals who are well funded/coordinated?
Maybe engineers and pilots that have spoken out against the official story don't count as people to you.
Maybe the firefighters that risked their lives that day lied about what they saw so no one would blame those lovable terrorist.
You must hate those that risked their lives to call them liars.
@JasonL77 There were a few smart people in key positions that assisted in the operation. Consider the much larger intelligence network that supposedly for months before 9/11 couldn't see what was happening right under there noses yet within one hour of the two towers disintegrating they had the crime virtually all figured out and televised. It was Bin-laden and his Al-Qaeda terrorist network operating out of Afghanistan and Iraq. And the clueless sheeple bought it hook, line and sinker.
So you are saying it wasnt anything that hit the towers, just an explosion?
You clearly demonstrate that a fighterjet with a much more dense structural configuration and less area to disperse energy would barely dent a reinforced
Back to the force-fed government kool-aid you moron. Sleeeep, sleeeeep, sleeeeeep. I suppose "Velocity" caused the 110 story bldg to collapse at freefall speed too huh? Oh yea that was the jet fuel that did that.
Ok first off that's a Phantom 4 Jet, not a boeing 757 commercial airliner. Second, that plane was doing Five Hundred mph. The 757 that hit the South Tower was doing Five Hundred and Forty Five mph. So I rule these incomparable by a long shot.
@BeyondTheGovernment Another key difference is the F4 hits the wall perpendicular on the vertical and horizontal axis. Call it dead center impact. All the kinetic energy is transferred through the plane which causes maximum energy concentration on center. Neither of the planes at the WTC were dead center impacts.
@carniverouspeaches i hear you humanbrother 3000 us 3 mio muslims dead after 9/11 i say Benjamin Netanyahu, MOSSAD / Cia / Al Qaida. The Head of the snake is then Netanyahi, even Bush is a minor compared
Just think about The Mavi Marmara, and 10000 wounded and 1400 killed in Gaza in a week. They are demons, and will do anything For satans israel
This is not physics. * American Airlines Flight 11, a 767-223ER, north tower 159 ft 2 in long. * United Airlines Flight 175, a 767-200, south tower 159 ft 2 in long.
560 mph = 792 ft per second.
Video at 24 frames per second equals 33 ft per frame.
159 ft / 33 = appx 5 frames for plane to enter building.
I have heard on one video the plane takes 8 frames to enter building.
If you can decide a plane did not slow down in 5 or 8 frames of video, you are a god.
The part in the vid where the shuttle hits the wall and disappears is 100% proof that it is possible for a plane to be virtually gone after hitting a concrete wall (like the Pentagon)
You are an idiot, your comment is stupid. You must be one of those gullible and ignorant republicans who NEEDS the govt and wishes to live the Beaver Cleaver life.
@BellyLover06 OK MY FRIEND,,,,,,,,,,HOW WOULD THE PLANE DESINTEGRATE AT THE PENTAGON,,,,,,,,,AND AT THE SAME TIME,,,,,,,,,,LEAVE A HOLE THROUGH THREE RINGS OF THE PENTAGON,,,,,,,,,I HOPE YOU ARE SMARTER THAN THAT,,,,,,,,,,,,NOT EVEN A MARK WHERE THE TAIL,,,,,,,,WINGS,,,,,,,,AND ENGINES WOULD HIT,,,,,,,,,COME ON MAN,,,,,,,,,,USE THE ANALYTICAL PORTION OF THE BRAIN
Ace Baker, a long haired hipple wannabe is an exposed fake that got owned on TV over another of it stupid vids. This vid is equally stupid in that it attempt to compare apples and oranges. The WTC wasn't a concrete block, over half the surface area of the exterior walls are glass for Pete's sake, of course it pentrated.
He's pointing out the fact that the plane wouldn't necessarily "bend" or "slow down" as it impacted the building. The video shows exactly that. The poster of this video is not a truther.
godzillaWhat plane? Google "Plane Crash" and notice how every other Plane crash has left a PLANE on the ground, not a hole filled with pieces no larger than that which could be held in your hand? Where the wings? the tail? the cockpit? NONE of this is present, it's like the Pentagon! A freakin' missile was fired at the ground. The coroner that arrived on the scene said he stopped being a coroner after 5 minutes because there WERE NO BODIES. Why are there ZERO bodies at all these 'plane' crashes?
You just want to ignore the thousands of people who saw the attacks first hand at NY. 130+ witnesses seen the plane fly towards the Pentagon. Not to mention the attacks lacked the characteristics of a missile assault. Laser guided missiles are only 1/4 the size of a commercial liner.
The towers offered a hell of a lot less resistance to a much bigger aircraft than the concrete offered to the Phantom. You don't see the damage to the towers right away because there is also fuel being pushed out of the wings as they break up. All of the broken stuff continued on through the windows and gaps cut in the columns by impact. Notice that when the Phantom hit the wall, the wing tips broke off cleanly and just kept going on straight ahead for some distance.
tv fakery didnt get owned. ace baker got owned because he only knows the BASIC truth about 9/11! he didnt talk about the nose out, he didnt talk about the physics! and he didnt mention that the cnn footage is a cartoon! he didnt do his research!
Also, look at video titled Killtown: why use real planes? Foreward to 2:28 and stop. Then 2:29 and stop. The freakin plane is more than 3/4ths of the way INSIDE THE BLDG WITH NO DAMAGE TO BLDG OR NO DEBRIS EXPLOSION AT ALL? HOW CAN THIS BE?
911 truthinator, Im sure you have seen this but look at /watch?v=rig-Aipu_Yo View at full size and stop footage at the end of the one second mark. Notice plane is more than 3/4ths of the way into the bldg without any damage to plane or bldg. Where is all that "impact debris" like the stuff shown in your jet video? I mean Ive enlarged your video and slowed it down and the nose of your jet barely enters concrete before "BOOM" major debris and damage is seen(unlike 175).
for one thing, this hit a completly concret barrier, the 911 planes hit a building with glass that would have broken plus we don't have a clue how fast these jet was going, it didn't look like it traveled that far before it hit, but it probably can accelerate fast. Again though, this hit a completely flat, concrete barrier, the towers would have gave a little, plus i'm sure on the other side of wall, the plane parts that had already hit were torn all to heck.
Thats fine but do u have a picture at the moment of impact? Im certain whatever hit it, didnt disapear(melt) into the steel. Im certain there was an instant "explosion" of parts and metal, un-like the 175 hit where it seamlessly and invisibly melts into wtc.
think about the beginning of what u just said. quote"flt 175 penetrated the steel, glass, 4 inch thick concrete...." That is absurd. Regardless of speed, aluminum wont do that....it will do what ur video shows, it will obliterate(explode, crumble TWIST). The 175 vid shows 3/4ths of the plane inside the bldg before any of this occurs. Explain that??
lead can do it, lets say, a 50 cal machine gun round will go through it all and keep going. Aluminum is stronger than copper coated lead, traveling 500 miles an hour. the plane did crumble and twist while it was in the building, it's like riding in a car, if you hit the breaks, your body still keeps moving forward. Its called the law of inertia. The plane was damaged, but all the parts kept moving forward, and unfortunately, the walls weren't stronge enough to hold it outside so you could see.
@SeekNTruth Aluminum wont do that??? Dude. A fucking B25 that weighs a 10th the amount of a 767 flew straight through the exterior wall of the Empire State building in 1945. (a fortress of cement compared to the WTC!!) It was flying SLOW.
A 767 that weighs 13 X more? Traveling at 540mph hitting the "Lightweight lattice of columns" (look it up!!) of the WTC. A building that is 95% AIR?
I think u miss Ace's whole point. On the 2nd crash vid(I believe Hezerkani vid), the wings, engines etc are completely "inside" bldg before ANY explosion, destruction takes place. Your vid proves the point that there should be SOMETHING happening immediately on impact. The 2nd hit vid shows plane "melting" into bldg instead of destruction. Explosions occur after plane is already more than halfway into bldg. IMPOSSIBLE!!
I hear that Ace is a pretty damn good Baker!!
roquefortfiles 3 months ago
That's a fake. That F4 is a holographic projection masking a Saturn V rocket impacting a balsa wood model of a 200 ton block of concrete, prewired with 750 lbs of C4 plastic explosives to make you think that you are seeing an F4 Phantom impacting a block of concrete from a rocket sled. I know for a fact that 911truthinator is actually Dick Cheney's YouTube user name.
Oh, and since you real "truthers" out there are too dense to know any different, the above comment is SARCASM!
pdc023 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Truthers are fucking idiots. Retarded monkeys are smarter than Truthers.
12weasel100 7 months ago
So i am guessing the people in the sky lobby who had the wing of 175 slice straight through it and kill many people almost instantly.. and one Asian lady who managed to survive it and tell her story...
They really dreamed it all.. never really happened.
If i was on this show i would fucking slap this twit!!! Unbelievable!!. WHERE do these fucking cranks come from?? Moreover how does someone become this stupid is the bigger question.
roquefortfiles 11 months ago
what about building 7 arsewipe??........no planes there??....
and apparently? no bombs? please explain silly bollocks..
twistedarseplater 1 year ago
For all you people out there that are saying 911 is fake, or a gov. conspiracy, or whatever. Please shut up. Words cannot describe how stupid you all are.
1. People saw this with their own eyes so video editing is out of the question
2. For the gov. to stage such a event would require so much money, that the people would notice a drop in budget and it would be pointless.
3. Most importantly, you are all idiots.
BTW, skyscrapers are designed to collapse like they did to prevent mass damage.
consular3 1 year ago
@consular3 twoofers are way too stupid to understand how stupid they really are.
911TRUTHINATOR 1 year ago
@911TRUTHINATOR yeah amen lol
consular3 1 year ago
This is an extremely bad representation to compare 911 planes. First off the planes went directly into the buildings. We didn't see pulverized plane parts go laterally up and down, we seen it go into the building. If you are comparing this to 911 planes, your sadly mistaken on your premise. The planes didn't get pulverized and fall straight to the ground, which in this video demostrates with this particular aircraft. Another 911Truthinator FAIL! Dumb down propagandized fools.
energyismass 8 months ago
@consular3 actually they would have gained WAY more money. But yea, no planers r idiots
drifter402 5 months ago in playlist NO PLANES DEBUNKED.
Great vid, Truthinator. Though I would say this doesn't display exactly what would happen with a 757, it shows that a plane would essentially be torn to bits. What many no-planers also forget is that WTC was not a solid wall, it was columns with lots of glass. They also forget that if it were a military plane with a bomb device, it could absolutely penetrate the walls easily.
snoopyd80 1 year ago
@snoopyd80 this video is to show the twoofers that the body and wings don't twist and bend and the tail won't break off before hitting the wall.
please watch my "9/11 WTC PLANES THRU STEEL" detailing how the planes entered the towers.
watch?v=PhKrirlTw8c
cheers.
911TRUTHINATOR 1 year ago
F4 Phantom Vs. Wall
Same footage unedited.
At the end the narrator even says the block does its job well while the planes is "atomized" on impact.
spacemonk420 1 year ago
Well, one thing is for sure.....this plane did not penetrate the concrete block. It disintegrated and what looks like going through, is actually the wings going past the sides
Enferushostis 1 year ago
Good on you 911TRUTHINATOR.
Your even dumber then those that agree blindly.
You posted proof which contradicts you position
Like others have said before, this just proves that planes alone would not do any real damage to the building.
spacemonk420 1 year ago
@spacemonk420 you must be one the dumbest, retarded,stupidest twoofer on youtube. you actually think the wtc walls were made of concrete like in this video,
i actually researched the consttruction of the WTC and everything ab6out 9-11 before i made videos and learnt how stupid,crazy,ignorant twoofers really are
watch?v=PhKrirlTw8c
i hope you don't have a car and a car licence and drive on public roads. thats the only thing that scares me about stupid twoofers.
911TRUTHINATOR 1 year ago
@911TRUTHINATOR
You obviously left the critical thinking part of your intellect out of your research.
You have a limited capacity to process facts and physics that translate into realistic models of reality.
Do you have any knowledge of ballistics or physics?
Do you have any practical experience in working with metals like structural steel and aluminum?
Have you ever tried to melt steel with gas?
You are a sad used up douche that thinks uneducated opinions trump experience and evidence.
spacemonk420 11 months ago 3
@spacemonk420 So explain to me how a government that can't balance a budget, can't come up with a decent health care plan, couldn't cover up a blow job in the oval office, & couldn't cover up non-exisistant "Wepons Of Mass Destruction" in Iraq about a year or so after 9/11 is able to coordinate a big consipracy with the N.Y.P.D., F.D.N.Y., both liberals & conservatives in both houses of congress, American Airlines, plus thousands of others, & no one is going to talk?
JasonL77 11 months ago
@JasonL77
Are you saying that a government as incompetent as the one you describe would be able to defend itself against a group of highly motivated criminals who are well funded/coordinated?
Maybe engineers and pilots that have spoken out against the official story don't count as people to you.
Maybe the firefighters that risked their lives that day lied about what they saw so no one would blame those lovable terrorist.
You must hate those that risked their lives to call them liars.
spacemonk420 11 months ago
@JasonL77 There were a few smart people in key positions that assisted in the operation. Consider the much larger intelligence network that supposedly for months before 9/11 couldn't see what was happening right under there noses yet within one hour of the two towers disintegrating they had the crime virtually all figured out and televised. It was Bin-laden and his Al-Qaeda terrorist network operating out of Afghanistan and Iraq. And the clueless sheeple bought it hook, line and sinker.
zonsb 10 months ago
So you are saying it wasnt anything that hit the towers, just an explosion?
You clearly demonstrate that a fighterjet with a much more dense structural configuration and less area to disperse energy would barely dent a reinforced
concrete block , atomizing the plane.
roxxphatcox 1 year ago
@blackjerryboymetal
Back to the force-fed government kool-aid you moron. Sleeeep, sleeeeep, sleeeeeep. I suppose "Velocity" caused the 110 story bldg to collapse at freefall speed too huh? Oh yea that was the jet fuel that did that.
SeekNTruth 1 year ago
This proves 911 planes were fake
Enferushostis 1 year ago
Ok first off that's a Phantom 4 Jet, not a boeing 757 commercial airliner. Second, that plane was doing Five Hundred mph. The 757 that hit the South Tower was doing Five Hundred and Forty Five mph. So I rule these incomparable by a long shot.
BeyondTheGovernment 1 year ago
@BeyondTheGovernment Another key difference is the F4 hits the wall perpendicular on the vertical and horizontal axis. Call it dead center impact. All the kinetic energy is transferred through the plane which causes maximum energy concentration on center. Neither of the planes at the WTC were dead center impacts.
zonsb 10 months ago
That is a small jet, not a passenger jet, hitting a super reinforced concrete wall used for nuclear power plants. NOT a wall from a sky scraper.
DUHHHH, think a little more before you post a stupid video based on assumptions...
And it might be a good idea to find out the circumstances of a video like that before using it as "evidence". Or in this case, lack of evidence.
carniverouspeaches 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@carniverouspeaches i hear you humanbrother 3000 us 3 mio muslims dead after 9/11 i say Benjamin Netanyahu, MOSSAD / Cia / Al Qaida. The Head of the snake is then Netanyahi, even Bush is a minor compared
Just think about The Mavi Marmara, and 10000 wounded and 1400 killed in Gaza in a week. They are demons, and will do anything For satans israel
Maanchild 9 months ago
This is not physics. * American Airlines Flight 11, a 767-223ER, north tower 159 ft 2 in long. * United Airlines Flight 175, a 767-200, south tower 159 ft 2 in long.
560 mph = 792 ft per second.
Video at 24 frames per second equals 33 ft per frame.
159 ft / 33 = appx 5 frames for plane to enter building.
I have heard on one video the plane takes 8 frames to enter building.
If you can decide a plane did not slow down in 5 or 8 frames of video, you are a god.
change any numbers
ldbkbarnea 2 years ago
Beatifully put bro hey, like you only see this sort of special effects at the movies...
michaeledith 2 years ago
NEW YORK DOESN'T REALLY EXIST
legacy6684 2 years ago
The part in the vid where the shuttle hits the wall and disappears is 100% proof that it is possible for a plane to be virtually gone after hitting a concrete wall (like the Pentagon)
BellyLover06 2 years ago
BellyLover06
You are an idiot, your comment is stupid. You must be one of those gullible and ignorant republicans who NEEDS the govt and wishes to live the Beaver Cleaver life.
What a hoser
thcount 2 years ago
@BellyLover06 OK MY FRIEND,,,,,,,,,,HOW WOULD THE PLANE DESINTEGRATE AT THE PENTAGON,,,,,,,,,AND AT THE SAME TIME,,,,,,,,,,LEAVE A HOLE THROUGH THREE RINGS OF THE PENTAGON,,,,,,,,,I HOPE YOU ARE SMARTER THAN THAT,,,,,,,,,,,,NOT EVEN A MARK WHERE THE TAIL,,,,,,,,WINGS,,,,,,,,AND ENGINES WOULD HIT,,,,,,,,,COME ON MAN,,,,,,,,,,USE THE ANALYTICAL PORTION OF THE BRAIN
bigbopper993 2 years ago
Ace Baker, a long haired hipple wannabe is an exposed fake that got owned on TV over another of it stupid vids. This vid is equally stupid in that it attempt to compare apples and oranges. The WTC wasn't a concrete block, over half the surface area of the exterior walls are glass for Pete's sake, of course it pentrated.
willieofroanoke 2 years ago
He's pointing out the fact that the plane wouldn't necessarily "bend" or "slow down" as it impacted the building. The video shows exactly that. The poster of this video is not a truther.
fatsomamacheese 2 years ago
That does little to explain the video when the plane went into the building and came out the other side with no explosion yet.....
Caligirl0100 3 years ago
It explaines a lot when the plane crashes to the ground like it did in pennsylvania.
godzilla1077 2 years ago
godzillaWhat plane? Google "Plane Crash" and notice how every other Plane crash has left a PLANE on the ground, not a hole filled with pieces no larger than that which could be held in your hand? Where the wings? the tail? the cockpit? NONE of this is present, it's like the Pentagon! A freakin' missile was fired at the ground. The coroner that arrived on the scene said he stopped being a coroner after 5 minutes because there WERE NO BODIES. Why are there ZERO bodies at all these 'plane' crashes?
DarkestColors 2 years ago 3
You just want to ignore the thousands of people who saw the attacks first hand at NY. 130+ witnesses seen the plane fly towards the Pentagon. Not to mention the attacks lacked the characteristics of a missile assault. Laser guided missiles are only 1/4 the size of a commercial liner.
godzilla1077 2 years ago
its only logic this video. but all the dumb no planers cant understand it. 500mph plane vs steel? idiots aye.
whoiskilltown 3 years ago
The towers offered a hell of a lot less resistance to a much bigger aircraft than the concrete offered to the Phantom. You don't see the damage to the towers right away because there is also fuel being pushed out of the wings as they break up. All of the broken stuff continued on through the windows and gaps cut in the columns by impact. Notice that when the Phantom hit the wall, the wing tips broke off cleanly and just kept going on straight ahead for some distance.
leftysergeant 3 years ago
watch this no planers lol.
watch?v=44cFTrfjIfM
911TRUTHINATOR 3 years ago
i didnt see any big ass engines on that video im sure rest of plane does that but there is still gotta be a big ball of engine sumwhere
furaxtube 1 year ago
Ah! But is YOUR video faked?
noonesflower 3 years ago
noonesflower: That's paranoia talk!
Dertygian 3 years ago
tv fakery didnt get owned. ace baker got owned because he only knows the BASIC truth about 9/11! he didnt talk about the nose out, he didnt talk about the physics! and he didnt mention that the cnn footage is a cartoon! he didnt do his research!
chibangin007 3 years ago
Also, look at video titled Killtown: why use real planes? Foreward to 2:28 and stop. Then 2:29 and stop. The freakin plane is more than 3/4ths of the way INSIDE THE BLDG WITH NO DAMAGE TO BLDG OR NO DEBRIS EXPLOSION AT ALL? HOW CAN THIS BE?
SeekNTruth 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
9/11 inside job!
Lungyao1 3 years ago
911 truthinator, Im sure you have seen this but look at /watch?v=rig-Aipu_Yo View at full size and stop footage at the end of the one second mark. Notice plane is more than 3/4ths of the way into the bldg without any damage to plane or bldg. Where is all that "impact debris" like the stuff shown in your jet video? I mean Ive enlarged your video and slowed it down and the nose of your jet barely enters concrete before "BOOM" major debris and damage is seen(unlike 175).
SeekNTruth 3 years ago
for one thing, this hit a completly concret barrier, the 911 planes hit a building with glass that would have broken plus we don't have a clue how fast these jet was going, it didn't look like it traveled that far before it hit, but it probably can accelerate fast. Again though, this hit a completely flat, concrete barrier, the towers would have gave a little, plus i'm sure on the other side of wall, the plane parts that had already hit were torn all to heck.
streakingcameraman 3 years ago
Thats fine but do u have a picture at the moment of impact? Im certain whatever hit it, didnt disapear(melt) into the steel. Im certain there was an instant "explosion" of parts and metal, un-like the 175 hit where it seamlessly and invisibly melts into wtc.
SeekNTruth 3 years ago
Hi, this hit a completely solid, flat, concrete barrier.
streakingcameraman 3 years ago
think about the beginning of what u just said. quote"flt 175 penetrated the steel, glass, 4 inch thick concrete...." That is absurd. Regardless of speed, aluminum wont do that....it will do what ur video shows, it will obliterate(explode, crumble TWIST). The 175 vid shows 3/4ths of the plane inside the bldg before any of this occurs. Explain that??
SeekNTruth 3 years ago 4
look at my channels background image.
911TRUTHINATOR 3 years ago
lead can do it, lets say, a 50 cal machine gun round will go through it all and keep going. Aluminum is stronger than copper coated lead, traveling 500 miles an hour. the plane did crumble and twist while it was in the building, it's like riding in a car, if you hit the breaks, your body still keeps moving forward. Its called the law of inertia. The plane was damaged, but all the parts kept moving forward, and unfortunately, the walls weren't stronge enough to hold it outside so you could see.
streakingcameraman 3 years ago
@SeekNTruth spot on mate glad some people still have some sense and a brain
blingblingtingting 1 year ago
@SeekNTruth Aluminum wont do that??? Dude. A fucking B25 that weighs a 10th the amount of a 767 flew straight through the exterior wall of the Empire State building in 1945. (a fortress of cement compared to the WTC!!) It was flying SLOW.
A 767 that weighs 13 X more? Traveling at 540mph hitting the "Lightweight lattice of columns" (look it up!!) of the WTC. A building that is 95% AIR?
Are you kidding me?
With EASE!!!
Get to know VELOCITY!!!
roquefortfiles 11 months ago
I think u miss Ace's whole point. On the 2nd crash vid(I believe Hezerkani vid), the wings, engines etc are completely "inside" bldg before ANY explosion, destruction takes place. Your vid proves the point that there should be SOMETHING happening immediately on impact. The 2nd hit vid shows plane "melting" into bldg instead of destruction. Explosions occur after plane is already more than halfway into bldg. IMPOSSIBLE!!
SeekNTruth 3 years ago 2
flight 175 penetrated the steel and glass and 4inch thick concrete slabs and did not twist, bend or break or slow down,
the fighter did not twist, bend or break or slow down as it hit a solid concrete wall
did it ? the tail of the fighter was still at speed when it vapourized.
911TRUTHINATOR 3 years ago
another great post 5/5
SlimeBuster 3 years ago