Do you believe an ex USConstitutional Law Professor at Harvard would commit political suicide? if not as a last resort to committing literal suicide? Act, before the bombs begin to slaughter innocent lives in the name of profit for the military industrial complex. Humanity is in a critical moment. Truth shall prevail.
Good Mr. President Obama must be impeached to save him from the coup d etat of December 31st, 2011. Stick to the facts. Focus. Stand up. Save Mr. President Obama from his contract with the "devil".
Any President who breaks the USConstitution must be impeached. It's actually what Mr. President Obama hoped would happen to him by signing the NDAA, which he only did unflder coercion, as a way to protect his family. The sooner he is impeached, the sooner the Pentagon's war games end.
Yes, your discussion of war has distracted your debate from the point: the USConstitution must not be broken. All else is smoke. The fire is already so hot that 2 apparently intelligent people are lost in a room of mirrors, getting burned in all sides. Any President who breaos the USCinstitution must be impeached.
Представьте себе, что все люди на земле подарят вам по 1 рублю, им будет это не сложно, а Вы в одночасье станните Миллиардером.Здорово!Вопрос в том, как побудить их это сделать.Став участником Международной Системы Финансовой Взаимопомощи,Вы будете ежедневно получать на свои счета сотни денежных переводов.И не по 1 рублю, а по 5$ 10$ и 15$. htp : // gmgalick.goldline. pro (скапируйте ссылку в браузер и уберите пробелы)СЕРТИФИКАТ № GA16921 ПОДАРЮ ПО 10$ КАЖДОМУ, ГАРАНТИРУЮ! скайп: gmgalick
Whats dangerous and naive about following the constitution?. Want a war?, go to congress, make your case, declare it and get it over with.
We cannot afford this nonsense anymore.
What negative pronouncements?.
Have you even served?. We've been at war for over a decade, Madison warned us what would happen under perpetual war, and increasing seize of government power by the executive branch.
@bluesrockfan36 What's with Ron Paul supporters constantly asking if people have served? As a matter of fact, yes, I'm an active duty officer in the US Army, and was enlisted in the US Air Force before that. But Jeremiah Wright also served, and it doesn't make him any less anti-American. I do understand your underlying point though, that it's easy to declare war when you're not the one paying the consequences... well taken and agreed.
However, we shouldn't swerve from one extreme to the other.
The question is mainly due, that most people who advocate for constant un-declare, never ending wars don't comprehend in the slightest the dangers troops have to face.
I'm not anti war at all, don't get me wrong. I'm against going into war under a U.N or NATO banner, and never asking once the people's representative, if they want or not go to war.
They're hardly extremes, believe it or not, Paul's position has been heavily mis-reported by the media.
@bluesrockfan36 I agree with your views wholeheartedly. Simply put, the threshold to go to war should be higher than it has been since the second half of the 20th century. However, a dirty little truth and hidden benefit of these "small wars" is that they keep our enemies from becoming powerful enough so as to drag us into a catastrophic war down the road (i.e. WWII & Cold War). That's the rationale. In Iran's case, it seems like a very legitimate case where we need to take out their nukes.
Our presence in the middle east only helps the radical fundamentalists gain recruits. And we financially can't stay there much longer, or we'll end up like the Soviets.
My fear about Iran, is that attacking it would trigger WW 3.
But besides, what makes you believe that they have a nuclear weapon, or they're trying to get one?. There really isn't much evidence for it.
@bluesrockfan36 The nuclear capabilities that the Iranians are pursuing far exceeds what is needed for energy purposes, and clearly goes into the realm of atomic weaponization. Also the delivery systems which they keep testing (missiles) and the genocidal rhetoric from their leadership.... The biggest strategic threat would be for Iran to use terrorist groups as the delivery method for their nukes. Hezbollah with a nuke would not even need to detonate it to have us and our allies by the balls.
That's simply not accurate. The most outrageous report, which mind you didn't base it's sources claimed Iran was enriching Uranium to 20%. You need over 95% for weaponization.
There is no genocidal rhetoric, only extreme misquotations. Look it up if you don't believe me, you know when Ahmadinejad was quoting Kohemini.
Why would Iran use a terrorist group?, it's very easy to trace the source of a nuclear weapon if detonated.
Then Iran would become a parking lot by Israels nukes
To be honest I'd worry more about Pakistan than Iran
They *do* have nuclear weapons, and they're heading into a civil war. Now that wont be pretty.
Why not focus on the real issue, instead of the imaginary 'could' be issue?.
There is again, no evidence Iran is weaponizing it's nuclear programs. They never refused and inspection by international bodies, and has extended invitations to the IAEA inspectors
IAEA never found Iran in non-compliance of the non-proliferation protocols
He's for a strong navy, to protect trade routes, and using submarines to defend ourselves, which mind you are very powerful weapons.
He's only against undeclared wars, and giving totalitarian powers to the executive branch. That only occurs in tyrannies.
Occupation, preemptive undeclared wars (without any imminent threat to the U.S) goes against the very core principles on which our Republic was founded.
We shouldn't be so eager to give away our rights in such manner.
--->> Ron Paul 2012 -- MONEY BOMB <<---- ronpaul2012 . com
Donate toward preserving the liberties which our government has grossly perverted since the founding of our nation. Help restore our rights and freedoms.
"America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" Edmund Burke
@bluesrockfan36 break the mirrors.
ManosOceano 2 weeks ago
Do you believe an ex USConstitutional Law Professor at Harvard would commit political suicide? if not as a last resort to committing literal suicide? Act, before the bombs begin to slaughter innocent lives in the name of profit for the military industrial complex. Humanity is in a critical moment. Truth shall prevail.
ManosOceano 2 weeks ago
Save good Mr. President Obama, USA people: impeach him for his obvious breach of the USConstitution. Break the mirrors.
ManosOceano 2 weeks ago
Good Mr. President Obama must be impeached to save him from the coup d etat of December 31st, 2011. Stick to the facts. Focus. Stand up. Save Mr. President Obama from his contract with the "devil".
ManosOceano 2 weeks ago
Any President who breaks the USConstitution must be impeached. It's actually what Mr. President Obama hoped would happen to him by signing the NDAA, which he only did unflder coercion, as a way to protect his family. The sooner he is impeached, the sooner the Pentagon's war games end.
ManosOceano 2 weeks ago
Yes, your discussion of war has distracted your debate from the point: the USConstitution must not be broken. All else is smoke. The fire is already so hot that 2 apparently intelligent people are lost in a room of mirrors, getting burned in all sides. Any President who breaos the USCinstitution must be impeached.
ManosOceano 2 weeks ago
@USA4July1776 Enemy? Why?
ManosOceano 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Представьте себе, что все люди на земле подарят вам по 1 рублю, им будет это не сложно, а Вы в одночасье станните Миллиардером.Здорово!Вопрос в том, как побудить их это сделать.Став участником Международной Системы Финансовой Взаимопомощи,Вы будете ежедневно получать на свои счета сотни денежных переводов.И не по 1 рублю, а по 5$ 10$ и 15$. htp : // gmgalick.goldline. pro (скапируйте ссылку в браузер и уберите пробелы)СЕРТИФИКАТ № GA16921 ПОДАРЮ ПО 10$ КАЖДОМУ, ГАРАНТИРУЮ! скайп: gmgalick
richmalika58 2 weeks ago
The issue with Ron Paul has never been his economic views, but his dangerously naive foreign policy and negative pronouncements against America.
USA4July1776 1 month ago
@USA4July1776
Whats dangerous and naive about following the constitution?. Want a war?, go to congress, make your case, declare it and get it over with.
We cannot afford this nonsense anymore.
What negative pronouncements?.
Have you even served?. We've been at war for over a decade, Madison warned us what would happen under perpetual war, and increasing seize of government power by the executive branch.
bluesrockfan36 1 month ago
@bluesrockfan36 What's with Ron Paul supporters constantly asking if people have served? As a matter of fact, yes, I'm an active duty officer in the US Army, and was enlisted in the US Air Force before that. But Jeremiah Wright also served, and it doesn't make him any less anti-American. I do understand your underlying point though, that it's easy to declare war when you're not the one paying the consequences... well taken and agreed.
However, we shouldn't swerve from one extreme to the other.
USA4July1776 1 month ago
@USA4July1776
The question is mainly due, that most people who advocate for constant un-declare, never ending wars don't comprehend in the slightest the dangers troops have to face.
I'm not anti war at all, don't get me wrong. I'm against going into war under a U.N or NATO banner, and never asking once the people's representative, if they want or not go to war.
They're hardly extremes, believe it or not, Paul's position has been heavily mis-reported by the media.
bluesrockfan36 1 month ago
@bluesrockfan36 I agree with your views wholeheartedly. Simply put, the threshold to go to war should be higher than it has been since the second half of the 20th century. However, a dirty little truth and hidden benefit of these "small wars" is that they keep our enemies from becoming powerful enough so as to drag us into a catastrophic war down the road (i.e. WWII & Cold War). That's the rationale. In Iran's case, it seems like a very legitimate case where we need to take out their nukes.
USA4July1776 1 month ago
@USA4July1776
I understand your point, but I fail to see it.
Our presence in the middle east only helps the radical fundamentalists gain recruits. And we financially can't stay there much longer, or we'll end up like the Soviets.
My fear about Iran, is that attacking it would trigger WW 3.
But besides, what makes you believe that they have a nuclear weapon, or they're trying to get one?. There really isn't much evidence for it.
bluesrockfan36 1 month ago
@bluesrockfan36 The nuclear capabilities that the Iranians are pursuing far exceeds what is needed for energy purposes, and clearly goes into the realm of atomic weaponization. Also the delivery systems which they keep testing (missiles) and the genocidal rhetoric from their leadership.... The biggest strategic threat would be for Iran to use terrorist groups as the delivery method for their nukes. Hezbollah with a nuke would not even need to detonate it to have us and our allies by the balls.
USA4July1776 1 month ago
@USA4July1776
That's simply not accurate. The most outrageous report, which mind you didn't base it's sources claimed Iran was enriching Uranium to 20%. You need over 95% for weaponization.
There is no genocidal rhetoric, only extreme misquotations. Look it up if you don't believe me, you know when Ahmadinejad was quoting Kohemini.
Why would Iran use a terrorist group?, it's very easy to trace the source of a nuclear weapon if detonated.
Then Iran would become a parking lot by Israels nukes
bluesrockfan36 1 month ago
@USA4July1776
To be honest I'd worry more about Pakistan than Iran
They *do* have nuclear weapons, and they're heading into a civil war. Now that wont be pretty.
Why not focus on the real issue, instead of the imaginary 'could' be issue?.
There is again, no evidence Iran is weaponizing it's nuclear programs. They never refused and inspection by international bodies, and has extended invitations to the IAEA inspectors
IAEA never found Iran in non-compliance of the non-proliferation protocols
bluesrockfan36 1 month ago
@USA4July1776
He's for a strong navy, to protect trade routes, and using submarines to defend ourselves, which mind you are very powerful weapons.
He's only against undeclared wars, and giving totalitarian powers to the executive branch. That only occurs in tyrannies.
Occupation, preemptive undeclared wars (without any imminent threat to the U.S) goes against the very core principles on which our Republic was founded.
We shouldn't be so eager to give away our rights in such manner.
bluesrockfan36 1 month ago
I AM VOTING FOR RON PAUL. Because i can see a better future if he is in the office.
Vietboy1st 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RonPaulRonPaul____RonPaulRonPaul____RonPaul____RonPaulRonPaul
_______RonPaul____Ron_______Paul____RonPaul___________RonPaul
RonPaulRonPaul____Ron_______Paul____RonPaul____RonPaulRonPaul
RonPaul___________Ron_______Paul____RonPaul____RonPaul
RonPaulRonPaul____RonPaulRonPaul____RonPaul____RonPaulRonPaul
SilverNowPeople 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
--->> Ron Paul 2012 -- MONEY BOMB <<---- ronpaul2012 . com
Donate toward preserving the liberties which our government has grossly perverted since the founding of our nation. Help restore our rights and freedoms.
"America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" Edmund Burke
Ron Paul 2012!
ronpaul2012hope 1 month ago
0%0%0%: ) : ) : ) : ) ; )
4Freedomrider 1 month ago
Going to other sources for the Federal Government means Organ harvesting of the debtors for the elite. LOL
4Freedomrider 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHAT a good day - TORN DOWN TWO Ron paul signs!! If you want a pic of me pissin on them LET ME KNOW and I can email them to you!
TKDMike58 1 month ago
Fugazi.... x D
DEEPGNOSTIC 1 month ago
Rombama* I think u ment :P
shorty4g6314 1 month ago
Romnama
optionsupdate 1 month ago
The Romney Obama office are working overtime forging Romneys tax return documents and tryion to think of excuses for that they cant hide
PHONEYPOLITICS 1 month ago