Added: 3 years ago
From: UnreportedResistance
Views: 24,673
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (166)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Damn, this was a dirty, filthy campaign

  • And we think ads are negative, distasteful, and downright malicious today.

  • So what does it say then that the American Communist party supported Obama in 2008?

  • lmao** incredible yes he did say niggerism i had to listen twice? say whaaaaa? &what happened? Voted for Johnson, the media sucked back then too! they will do to Ron Paul what they did to Goldwater .. the enemies of freedom often use the boogieman to make the good guy look really bad.. Barry Goldwater was a good man and his views are as old as the constitution and Ron Paul is very much like him. Romney is our Johnson, Ron Paul is our Goldwater! George Soros is the boogie man they will use!

  • @snowbal1776 EXACTLY! BRAVO! Libertarianism! Republicanism! Individualism! Smith, Hayek, Friedman, and RAND! Self-determination!

  • I wasn't aware "niggerisim" was a thing.

  • @ProjectOrigins The voice of ignorance! Libertarianism is the ENEMY of all Racism! We are ALL individuals- and must respect each other as such.

  • And that Klan leader is being way too narrow minded (surprise lol). I'm sure there's at least ONE ism that he lmay like. You just gotta keep lookin brother...

  • "niggerism" made me chuckle. Its not a term you hear nowadays. And LBJ really threw the kitchen sink at Golwater in 1964. All of his ads were pretty nasty (the 1964 version of nasty)

  • Is this a preview of a 2012 GOP ad?

  • @joeyess It's already been done to Ron Paul in multiple forums. Most notably in a presidential debate. He was asked to denounce all of the racist groups that support him. The same old tactic they used against Mr. Goldwater is being used on Paul today.

  • never go full retard

  • how is this any different then the recent rick perry ad?

  • funny how the civil rights act didn't really help race relations, it was progressive parenting and teaching the evils of racism that helped.

  • So the Klan liked Goldwater and the terrorists like Obama.....what's your point?

  • If Goldwater had won, US would not be in the shitter now.

  • the ancestors of today's Tea Party.

  • LBJ's got some crazy ads......

  • Do they still spit om Goldwater's grave?

  • LOL and LBJ stood before his long time friend and Fellow Democrat; The Grand Kleagle of the KKK, Sen. Robert C. Byrd and proclaimed: There'll be no niggerism up in dis here Whitehouse

  • Niggerism? Did j'e seriously say niggerism???

  • Racism is associated with the Democratic party at this time, the ad is absurd.

    Read the following. don't forget to add the h tea tea pee

    bit [dot] ly / ifqFA2

  • Racism is associated with the Democratic party at this time, the ad is absurd.

  • @independentnc Not at all. After supporting various civil rights initiatives, people were just begining to migrate to the GOP. The truth is that racist preferred Goldwater.

  • If you KKK found out Goldwater was Jewish they wouldn't like him anymore ;-)

  • LBJ is meaning to say: the KKK supports Jewish Barry Goldwater???? Dumb Race-Baiting FAIL.

  • @Royster1992 but they did.

  • @IAmTheGreatGatzby last time i checked, the KKK hated EVERYONE that was not white and protestant. there is a MAJOR difference between true American Conservatism and racial bigotry. so Democrats=Race Baiting Heathens.

  • And Goldwater voted AGAINST the Civil Rights Act in 1964. So, who was playing the race card? Goldwater himself. No wonder the KKK endorsed him. The Republican Party itself tried to block his nomination with this memo: "You have too often stood for irresponsibility in the serious question of racial holocaust". - quote from Theodore H. White, The Making of the President: 1964, p. 208. Is it race-baiting when a candidate is an outright racist?

  • @bwillis1975 He voted against the civil rights acts for good reasons, it trampled over the constitution and interfered with a man's right to conduct business with whoever he chooses and refuse business with whoever he chooses. Compare the reasons Goldwater voted against it with the southern Democrats at the time such as Robert Byrd. You really wouldn't think a Scot would have to teach an American his own history.

  • @DukeofWellington91 Exactly, sir! Well said. And absolutely accurate.

  • 25 years later they depicted a truck and a chain and suggested that Republicans would cheer for black people being dragged to death. Really ugly racial politics and fearmongering. The Democratic playbook.

  • LBJ Strategist 1 (reading script): "We represent the majority of the people of Alabama who hate Negroism(?), Catholicism, Judaism..."

    Strategist 2: Should we mention Goldwater has some Jewish ancestry?

    Both: NAH! (or something similar that would have been said in 1964)

  • The part that is most crazy about this sort of reasoning is that the segregationists were southern Democrats!

  • Oddly, most of the klansmen I knew back then were staunch democrats who wouldn't have voted for a republican if Jesus himself were running. The so-called southern strategy didn't come along until Nixon.

    It's a great ad though! Truth is typically the first casualty in both war and politics. Sticklers for truth should avoid ads and seek to be informed on their own. Sadly, most are too lazy which is why ads work so well.

  • @ricfax Really that is why 90% of Mississippi voted for Goldwater, as well as the States of Alabama, South Carolina ,Georgia and Lousianian was easily won by Barry Goldwater right?

  • @12Aggiefan,

    "Really that is why 90% of Mississippi voted for Goldwater, as well as the States of Alabama, South Carolina ,Georgia and Lousianian was easily won by Barry Goldwater right?"

    That area is about 40% black(back then I think it was even greater) and the grandfather clause was outlawed in 1915, so at least some of that vote had to be black. At this point, very few white southerners were klansmen.

  • @MegaAstrodude But the blacks were not allowed to vote back than. Only 3% of the vote in Mississippi was black in 1964 the highest precentage was Georgia with just 15% black voters! so your wrong you moron. Very few white southeners were actually enrolled or apart of the KKK but many white southeners beleived in their tenents which was white supermacy. Goldwater wasn't a racist but he was supported by Racists. But I still beleive LBJ was the real bigot and racist he was a POS!

  • @12Aggiefan,

    My source says about 6% of the vote was black, but either way you've got a point there. I didn't realize the vote was still skewed as late as 1964.

    It's a real pity too because Goldwater represented a certain commitment to responsible government throughout his entire career and supported the vast majority of the Civil Rights Acts.

  • @MegaAstrodude yea that's alright not everybody knows all the numbers. Your right Goldwater was a good man he was not a racist at all he supported most civil rights acts and he was part of the NAACP and his ancenstery was Jewish so the klan supporting him was stupid. But because he voted against the 1964 Act the Deep southeners jumped on the bandwagon.

  • @12Aggiefan Exactly.

  • @MegaAstrodude Are you really that stupid? Put it in context, we're not talking about the 1990's or the present era, we're talking about the south in the 1960's, when blacks were even allowed to vote.

  • @MegaAstrodude Are you really that stupid?  Put it in context, we're not talking about the 1990's or the present era, we're talking about the south in the 1960's, when blacks were not even allowed to vote.

  • @oldtownkid,

    Blacks were de jure allowed to vote legally then in Mississippi and the grandfather clauses had long been struck down.  They faced many obstacles to voting, but it was done. The black vote in the south was very crucial at this time because in 1960, it caused Kennedy to beat Nixon. In Mississippi, only about 6% of the blacks had the vote, but it was much higher in other parts of the south. Did you see the rest of the comment trail when I looked this up already?

  • couldnt defeat goldwater on ideas so lbj resorted to demagogery. funny how things in 64 are relatively the same way today. a gop that is scared/intimidated by the dems to say the way things really are. isnt it funny how in the 60s those in the civil rights movement pushed for a colorblind society, where a man/woman is judged by who rather than what they are, and if you support that notion today (prop 187 comes to mind) it's seen as racist, etc.

  • @aljanadcob sorry prop 209

  • @aljanadcob Exactly- and then he escalated the Vietnam war into a bloodbath.

  • This is horrible, I'm horrified that November 3rd is my birthday now -_-

  • "he also said:i like hayley barbour, he needs our happy"

  • they hate all isms? They forgot one big one, RACISM!

  • The origional boys n the hood

  • Comment removed

  • Goldwater's father's side was Jewish (family name was originally Goldwasser from Poland). No way would the KKK support a man whose family was even fractionally of Jewish descent.

  • @fumetti Well they preferred him over LBJ who supported civil rights.

  • @Moionfire LBJ supported it because it was politically expedient.

  • @fumetti It doesn't matter why, the point is that in the end Goldwater was against civil rights not just in principle but actively was against it.

  • @Moionfire,

    The 1964 Civil Rights Act, or rather certain portions of it, interferes with the civil rights of business owners and employees to refuse service to anyone they wish for whatever reason they wish. The portions of the act preventing states and towns from passing mandatory segregation ordinances are reasonable. The restrictions on polling places were understandable at the time but should be repealed now for universal convenience.

  • These were actually the first dirty attack ads in television history perpetrated by Bill Moyers. Johnson was a piece of shit, as were most of his cronies. O well, he's burning in hell now.

  • @manmanguy But so is Goldwater. If anything, he's burning hotter.

    Since when is the Civil Rights Act grounds for burning in hell?

  • @redsoxfan1984 Did I ever say he should burn in hell for the civil rights act? Nope. I merely disagree, as did Goldwater, with how it was written. Painting Goldwater as a racist is utter nonsense. As a Jew he would be axed by the KKK as well. He was one of the first Air Corps officers to integrate his unit, and he's the racist? The problem with the civil rights bill was over-intrusion of basic personal property rights by the federal govt'. So please, don't try to put words in my mouth.

  • @manmanguy "Over-intrusion on basic property rights by the federal gov't."

    Are you Rand Paul? The Civil Rights Act would've had zero affect in the South had it NOT desegregated "private property". If black people wanted to go into a known racist establishment, no one should stop them. It's their own fault (sort of) if they're harassed there.

    Also, Goldwater wasn't Jewish. He was Episcopalian. Don't assume he's Jewish based on his name.

  • @redsoxfan1984 Sorry man, but Goldwater was ethnically Jewish, and religiously Christian. I base that on his autobiography, not his name. So what you're saying is if someone came on to your property and you didn't want them there that it's ok for the govt' to force you to allow them to be there? That's called trespassing, which is illegal. So this is a double standard. What's the incentive in owning a business or property if you truly don't control it?

  • @manmanguy If you sell goods to the public you have no right to kick anyone out unless they are disorderly or doing something wrong. But you can't kick them out because of their race , sex, or gender. That isn't trespassing.

  • @MegaAstrodude Business owners don't have to serve all. If a person is drunk and disorderly, wearing a crash helmet, or butt naked, they can kick them out. However one can't kick someone out because they are white, asian, black, or gay.

  • @Moionfire

    Why not? People should be free to associate/serve whoever they want. It's called freedom, and it isn't always pretty, but it's better than letting government dictate how we live our lives. We have a tyrannical government that's overstepped it's bounds. All of it's efforts, no matter how well intentioned will only lead to suffering, corruption, and evil.

  • @doodofdoods

    Sure, buddy. And why not prevent them from living in certain communities? Don’t we as white men have the right to choose who our neighbors are? ‘

    And why are they voting? Don’t we as white men, as the majority, have a right to keep certain things for ourselves?

    Vote Ron Paul! Let’s bring back the 1950s!

  • @EuchridEucrow1 You are a racist jackass- and Ron Paul, as with Barry Goldwater- a JEW- would spit on you.

  • @EuchridEucrow1 The only right that you have is to your OWN private property, you collectivist racist imbecile! Read Ayn Rand- a Jew as Barry Goldwater was- and get your head straight!

  • @soapbxprod

    You're a thick bastard, ain't ya? The point was obviously about where Ron Paul and his followers would take America.

    People in the South WOULD band together and ban blacks from their neighborhoods and employment discrimination would be alive and well. For heavens sake, Ron Paul opposes civil rights for African Americans and have you read his pamphlet? He says he didn't know anything about its contents, but sure as sure is it's got his fucking name on it.

  • @EuchridEucrow1 Resort to imbecilic ad hominem attacks. You present NO coherent argument.

  • @EuchridEucrow1 Do you live in the South? Have you Ever even BEEN there?

  • @soapbxprod Been to the South more times than I can count.

  • @EuchridEucrow1 Class of 1982, Phil/Econ, Reed College- same college as Steve Jobs. Take me on.

  • @soapbxprod

    A couple passages to whet your appetite and give you an idea of this man's real beliefs:

    "Martin Luther King seduced underage boys and girls."

    "The Los Angeles riots ended when it came time for the blacks to pick up their welfare checks."

    "New York should be renamed Zooville because of all the monkeys."

    Any my favorite, "Homosexuals, not to speak of the rest of society, were far better off when social pressure forced them to hide their activities."

  • @EuchridEucrow1 I grew up in NYC. Was chased down the street and almost murdered there. Put up or shut up.

  • @EuchridEucrow1 C'mon- bring it.

  • @EuchridEucrow1 How about Jesse Jackson referring to NYC as HYMIETOWN?

  • @EuchridEucrow1 One more thing- I still live in NYC. We also have a home in NH.

  • @EuchridEucrow1 Majority rule? That is Mob Democracy, not Republican society! You are a NAZI RACIST jackass.

  • @EuchridEucrow1 You're describing exactly what FDR did with the FHA. Blacks and their neighborhoods were redlined and excluded from the mortgage market, forced to pay higher prices and mortgage rates for inferior housing.

  • @doodofdoods EXACTLY! It's all about Private Property! Well said...

  • @Moionfire,

    "However one can't kick someone out because they are white, asian, black, or gay. "

    I understand that they legally can't do that now, but why shouldn't they be allowed to do so? There have been cases where swastika wearing Neo-nazis successfully sued restaurants for being denied service and were championed by the ACLU. There have been other cases where people have been charged with civil rights violations for complaining of sexual harassment from homosexuals.

  • @MegaAstrodude Wearing a swastika or white hood is not naturally on all white people. Not all whites are neon-Nazi's or Klansman. Therefore equating that with being able to kick someone out solely because of their race is not equivalent at all. If someone won a case like that it wasn't because they had the right to kick whites out.

  • @Moionfire,

    Okay, I see your point: You think that if a person can easily change a certain attribute, a business should be allowed to require him to make that change if he wants service at that business. However, if the business wants a customer to change a relatively permanent attribute in order to have service, the customer's civil rights are violated.

    What about if a restaurant thinks a person might have a bad flu or virus? Should they be forced to serve him then?

  • @Moionfire Private property is private property. If you want to be stupid enough to deny service, and therefore deny business to yourself, on the basis of race, your business will fail!

  • @soapbxprod No it will not. If black people or any other racial minority is under 20%, a business can stay afloat and still exclude swaths of people based on race. Your post ignores that people in the past(recent past at that) forgo money in order to discriminate against blacks, mexicans, and others.

  • Comment removed

  • @soapbxprod A private home is different than a private business. You can keep blacks, asians, or some other group out of your HOME, but if you are selling goods to the public you can not ban a person based on sex, gender, nationality, or race. Your post ignores that business can discriminate and still stay afloat economically.

  • @Moionfire How so? A private business is private property, isn't it? Unless it receives public subsidies- then of course that business becomes a public business.

  • @redsoxfan1984 Goldwater's grandfather was Jew who came to Arizona from London England named Michael Goldwasser. He and his wife Sarah Nathan were married in the Great Synagogue of London. Goldwater's dad was born a Jew but only converted to Episcopal religion when he married his wife, Sarah Williams.

  • @redsoxfan1984 Besides, have you not heard the White House tapes of LBJ talking to MacNamara about his wishes to keep Vietnam as "White Man's Land"? Democrats really aren't as benevolent as you might think they are.

  • Dude for a second there i thought it was a real goldwater ad, and i was thinking "Shit sure im repulsed but damn that took some balls nigga!!!" lol

  • Typical attack ad. Progressives are the racists, sexists, and heterophobes.

  • Shameful attack ad. Makes us Democrats look horrendous.

  • I was told that if I voted for Goldwater we'd get into a war. So I voted for Goldwater and sure enough, the fabulously corrupt LBJ got us into a dead end called Vietnam.

  • Comment removed

  • Funny

  • lbj was a thug and a ganster who gave america the "johnson treatment" during the 64 election.

  • @ajgolfer1 We're still paying for Johnsons fuck ups today.

  • i hate that there niggerism

  • People seem to find this attack ad "dirty". What is so dirty or morally apprehensive about this? It's merely stating the truth that the KKK strongly preferred Goldwater over LBJ. The very fact that racists seem to prefer one candidate over the other proves something very important. It's not "race-baiting" or "fear-mongering" it's just pointing out the truth.

  • @dhfial1 goldwater was part jewish you are an idiot

  • @ajgolfer1 Obviously he was Jewish, his name is GOLD water. You think I didn't know that? The KKK was too stupid to realize that he was Jewish.

  • @dhfial1 half Jewish actually by ethinicity. Totally Christian however.

  • @dhfial1 You are in bad faith: this ad is clearly designed so that viewers will draw totally wrong conclusions about Barry Goldwater without proper contextualisation.

    The truth is, he supported the original civil rights and the NAACP, but not FORCED desegregation nor the so-called anti-discrimination legislation because he also supported property rights; in this, he was what could be called a true antiracist.

    Now, I double dare you to repeat that the ad is not "fear-mongering". ;)

  • @dhfial1 The civil rights legislation we passed in the 60's was a mistake. Look at our country today. We have one them in the White House.

  • @NYerintransit ...wow.

  • @dhfial1 did he really just say that?

  • @Seargent363 I think so, but I'm still having trouble believing it.

  • @dhfial1 True, and I agree with you. It's just that I don't think most people today would've seen an Obama ad with this kind of imagery, against McCain, or a Kerry/Gore ad with this against Bush.

  • @dhfial1 It proves nothing. Take Obama for example. Obviously the KKK can't support him, but that has no bearing on whoever opposes Obama. The KKK is simply gonna support whoever runs against him. If Obama. Same is true here. They didn't like LBJ because of the civil rights movement he was much apart of, and would've supported any other candidate regardless.

  • @adamv2 Do you really think the KKK would support whoever runs against Obama in 2012? What if the GOP nominated a black candidate? A Catholic? A Jew? As unlikely as that is, I highly doubt the KKK would ever support any candidate that isn't a WASP.

  • @dhfial1 Obviously if someone just as bad to them as Obama was running, they wouldn't support them either. Point being since chances are it will be a WASP...is that the KKK will be supporting that person over Obama just for being WASP. That alone isn't enough for Obama in good character to say the KKK supports ____. It would be dirty, just as it was in the case of LBJ. Now had Goldwater done and/or planned to do something if elected that got the KKK approval then maybe the ad would belong on TV.

  • @dhfial1

    So we should vote for canidates who are not supported by racists? Looks like EVERY SINGLE VOTER should stay home. Seriously? I rather vote for DAVID DUKE then Obama or Johnson.

  • @dhfial1 but it's irrelevant and negative.

  • @DonalLynchyou it is definitely not irrelevant. If an organization (KKK) which you (LBJ), and hopefully a majority of Americans oppose strongly supports your candidate, why would you not bring that up and question why Goldwater has KKK support? Its not like this ad misquoted or took a quote way out of context.

  • @janitormopmop What difference does it make if the KKK favour you over an opponent? If Goldwater had policies that are an advantage to the KKK than that's an issue but surely than you question the policies themselves. Maybe Goldwater supports non-profit organisations but nothing it this ad has any "relevance" to politics. This ad just promotes a tenuous, probably one way relationship between Goldwater and the KKK, and therefore it's "negative" campaigning.

  • @dhfial1 Come on that's a weak argument. It is a political ad, it's fear mongering, and it's meant to make people believe that Barry Goldwater is racist or associated with the KKK. You do realize that's what political campaigns are about??? Just pointing out the truth.

  • @dhfial1,

    "The very fact that racists seem to prefer one candidate over the other proves something very important. It's not "race-baiting" or "fear-mongering" it's just pointing out the truth."

    What truth? That Goldwater thought people should be allowed to be racist on their own property?

    See, here's why you're full of crap: the Ku Klux Klan also endorsed Obama. Hitler worked to outlaw smoking and meat eating, so I suppose non-smoking vegetarians are Nazis.

  • @MegaAstrodude The ignorance you display is mind-blowing...

  • @TennesseeOwnsMyBones,

    Ignorance of what? It's faulty logic to think that a person is racist just because he is endorsed by a racist group. The advertisement implies that Goldwater supported the KKK, which is downright dirty. There are plenty of Obama supporters who favor despotism and genocide; should you run an ad that says Jimmy Hoffa for Obama?

    Goldwater wasn't racist and the socialists said he was racist so they could steal an election and impose conscription.

  • Comment removed

  • @MegaAstrodude Also, no one had to steal the election in 1964. Goldwater completely self-destructed: nuclear weapons an option? Selling the TVA? Making Social Security voluntary? It's no suprise Johnson won by a landslide... Goldwater was not fit for the presidency, and millions of Americans knew it.

  • @TennesseeOwnsMyBones Social security is a fraud. The first generation that paid into the system was paying for the first recipients of the program. Any extra that was taken in was placed in a "trust" fund where it was converted to a gov't bond and the principal (real money) was paid into the general fund of the treasury and used to cover debt spending. Since day one, the system has operated solely on current taxation and in 2018, the spending will be> the taxes.

  • @TennesseeOwnsMyBones When the spending is more than the taxes, they will have to dip into the "trust" fund which is full of bonds (taxpayer IOU's). As soon as SS starts to cash in these bonds the American taxpayer will face one of two equally devastating consequences. Either we will print money to cover these old debts, or we will be taxed ever more in order to pay back these debts that a past generation promised to themselves. SS has enslaved us all to our grandparents

  • @MegaAstrodude Indeed, Goldwater himself was not racist. What his IDEOLOGY, however, DID make possible was the prolonguation of Jim Crow, as any federal interference in Southern state legislation would be deemed unconstitiutional... Funny how no mention was made about the unconstitutional goings on in Dixie where voting rights were concerned. Goldwater aided Jim Crow South, whether he supported it or not.

  • @MegaAstrodude Precisely! Well SAID!

  • @dhfial1,

    Martin Luther King explained why he opposed Goldwater. "While not himself a racist, Mr. Goldwater articulated a philosophy which gave aid and comfort to the racist. "

    So there you have it.

  • @dhfial1,

    You mean how the KKK that endorsed Barack Obama in the 2008 election. Fringe groups often make strange endorsements because they feel that any rattling of the political system will help them.

  • @MegaAstrodude The KKK did NOT endorse Obama. That was a hoax started by the British satirical newspaper the "daily squib."

  • @Moionfire,

    My source on that is a liberal talk show called The Young Turks.

  • @dhfial1 So you think guilt by association is a fair basis to judge a candidate?

  • @thejobloshow - It's not guilt by association. The ad never claimed the KKK was associated with Goldwater in any way. Just that the KKK endorsed Goldwater's agenda over Johnson's. Today, all the white supremacists flock to Ron Paul.

    watch?v=t4P87p-Arcw

  • @dhfial1

    It associates him with a group which he had nothing to do with, and it likens him to being a racist, which he clearly wasn't. That makes it dirty. I could easily find a few racists who like your YouTube videos...that doesn't mean that it would be fair to demonize you by running a TV ad which proudly stated "Dhfial1 Is A Favorite YouTube Channel Among White Supremacists".

  • Holy shit - now THIS is an attack ad.

  • @thejobloshow And people think politics is dirty today !! LOL

  • Comment removed

  • @thutton67 you says I am a nazi pig allthoug I dont like hitler . but you are a black people hater, too.

    u bitch.

    this is backbiting you pocket assbitches fool.

  • for a minute, i thought that they were quoting Daniel Carver (the KKK guy from Howard Stern) in this ad.

    XD

  • niggerism

  • niggerism haha

  • Talk about fighting dirty, thats not even dirty lol. I don't even know what to call that.

  • WOW! LBJ the TEXAS TURKEY tried everything to get reelected like lie through his teeth. I heard that HE had JFK assasinated, plus the Teamsters union hated him too

  • ok now this is just playing dirty.

  • Very heavy handed.

    Very unfair.

    Sen. Goldwater was a AF Maj General.

    Old LBJ was a Lieutanant (Navy) awarded a Silver Stay for riding in a B-26 that "may" have been fired on. That's what politicians get.

  • Hey democraps, you allready have the black, jewish and Massachusettes' voters, no need to run ads like this!

  • Goldwater was a jew and a NAACP donater. Fucking hell LBJ was the KKK friends with the KK and Ramsaey Clark was communist instigator of the KKK who "pretended" to oppose this mytholgoical threat conjured up by Fullbright, Gore, and etc. all Marxist southern democraps who had their buddies conduct marxist stunts to destabalize america and push through this fascist-marxist statist crap.

  • You should use the word Marxist more, I ALMOST thought you were intelligent for a second. I almost thought you knew what Marxism was. Almost . . . .. ..

  • Politics of fear. The Democratic Party has been pushing this narrative since the 1960s and still today.

  • @jachapin1 lol and the Republicans haven't been doing that. With the whole "Obama is a socialist/communist, he's trying to take your rights away" thing right?

    Or everything about terrorism and Dems being soft on it?

  • LMAO Back when the dems were willing to campaign as dirty as the repubs

  • And the democrats and and their race-baiting lives on....

  • @YOUGET4REAL yep, this attack ad is dirtier than Michael Moore's shit-stained underwear.

  • @YOUGET4REAL - and if there wasnt a racist candidate on the ballot from ANY party..would the KKK just pick one randomly to back? Or would they out and say "Dont vote for either of the darky lovers". The KKK will find the one candidate that pushes their racist agenda the most and ask their members to vote for them.

  • i gu

  • IM totally voting for LBJ now

  • They said the N word on :03

  • Whoa! I've never seen this before and had no idea it existed. Thanks for posting. I'll share this with my students.

  • @Interlingua This video actually wasn't shown on TV. They made it, but back tracked. Probably believed it was too much of an attack ad...

Loading...