Added: 4 years ago
From: bobbymullinix
Views: 22,671
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (99)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • By all means read his works if you want to know the man, but read it as you would poetry or literature. Most people are surprised by his writings because they usually expect something overtly satanic or awful...and find these things about yoga and concentration exercises and this idea of "the Great Work"...which could mean anything. Sure...some of Crowley's things are fearsome and explicit and even could be considered blasphemous...but for the most part one will probably yawn these days!

  • crowley surely was very talented in bad stuffs that some satanic devil helped him write the book of law, crowley was dipped in sins which he loved and considered honorable to him ----but what is bad remains bad even though you are good at it----so for me he was an evil man------------ and evil persons dont deserve praises rather lamentations and curses.

  • this man was a herion junkee idiot!!

  • kids with guns

  • "If you envoke the spirits to come and help you....." one clown says in this interview. Well, with all the occultists conjuring spirits, they're sure not getting very far. Why not get the winning Lottery numbers and after that really concentrate on practicing these idiotic rituals with no mundane concerns and interuptions? Oops, that's a suggestion that's a no-no. Occultists and Magickians can't do anything as practical as that. They're too interested in conversations with angels going nowhere.

  • @GaleZMe more particularily, HARNESSING the dark spirits to SERVE the Light!

  • @tomcornhole Or, in more practical language: straightening out off beat psychological patterns so that they transform to work for one not against one and one's overall welfare.

  • @GaleZMe i like to mock many forms of belief, including THeLema.

    fuck it! yet i don't like the bad vibes this dude encouraged. they're BAD.

    i like some of Mr. CrowLeys' 'fuck it all' nihilism.

    i also think he was a real bastard, lunatic, dope fiend, and possible reptilian fascist proto-nazi gizzbaLL. an amoral TRUST Fund baby.HORUS the TRUST FUND BABY LOL

    ooga booga the semantic spooks are still alive!

  • oh no, they experienced misfortune? must be the black magic. fuck off stupid movie.

  • @dhakhair lol

  • The Goetia's list of demons is VERY intimidating!

  • people dont play

    dont do the things the beast

    done you gonna die foerever he was a chosen person so stop magick and repent

  • @cublop you need an LSD experience

  • @mellowmushgrapetripp i took lsd years ago and was a pot smoker

    i tell you PHAMAKIA is sorcery you allow spirits to control your will

    drugs do that DESTROY your will your soul and keep you out of GOD

    chamans witches and all kind of black cults used this stuff ... look from 60s til now the world is DYING

  • @cublop no psychedelics dont destroy your will they desolve boundries, egos and neurotic beliefs such as believing in black magicx or demons, ive done lots of rituals nothing happens unless you find things to convience yourself that it did when you take lsd you dont convience yourself that its working lol people are afraid to learn the nature of reality people want a safty net when you take lsd or psilocybin you dont have one thats the point, if you want spirits, you wanna touch one smoke DMT

  • @mellowmushgrapetripp ahh nothing happens...yes sure

    liberation all happy druggy

    come on WAKE UP

    millons die of overdose or crime or suicide thats TRUTH

  • @cublop

    Congratulations, you are dumb.

  • Curiousity killed the mage.

  • crowleys awesome

  • The idea that he was summoning demons to convert them is a downright lie. He was a disgusting homans being.

  • yeh very true, how can he convert a demon to light if he is a demon him self?

  • you lost the thinking game...

  • Really? Kind of hard to do with an IQ of 131 (Upper 5%). What is yours?

  • Did you take a facebook IQ test, sweetie? That's adorable. No one as smart as you say you are would even THINK of using their IQ, especially without proof, to win an argument. It's a fallacy. I know from Crowley's own writings that he was anything but disgusting - many great men can be jackasses to people around them during their life, but to call a man disgusting who created a rather beautiful philosophy shows a lack of actual knowledge. And you fight back with your IQ? Good god.

  • @scottasbj Yeah but argueing on the internet proves that you're not.....shall we say "mature".

  • This from you?

  • 4:49 hey the theme from omen!

  • yah i relized that!

  • I cannot find anything on the major who committed suicide in this house?????

  • Good point about the major who shot himself, hmm. Love the name: ledzeplad... x

  • Pt.4.

    And yeah, it has been fun [and may be fun again :) ], and of course it's nothing personal (well maybe against Crowley- you might have guessed he's not my favourite person!) LOL

    Still, he lived a fascinating life and changed the world, nobody can deny that..!

    FIN.

  • By the way, i posted a message to your inbox on your profile. It's just an extension of the verbal fun and games, take no notice of it, like i said it's not personal. Anyway, all the best and let's hope we can find another subject to argue over or maybe we should carry on with Crowley. You are a lot better at Dialectics than most people on any comments page. So here's to more vitriolic abuse slung forth in the name of good humour!

  • tommynotchelsea go back to watching your cartoons- you've got nothing productive or of any substance to share here.

    You've got plenty of episodes of Duck Tails, Transformers and Captain Planet on your channel that you need to get through, kid.

    Leave the 'grown-up talk' for grown-ups. ;)

  • "more than one person has asked u to provide a source for your accusations and u can't do it."

    I provided quotes from Crowleys OWN writings that he's racist, that he has no sexual morals, he was a no-good drug head his whole life.

    "you tried misinterpreting one of his metaphors to support your case"

    no- HE misinterpreted it, you're just lying (if anyone else reads this go see for yourself!)

    "i think it's pretty obvious you are reaching.."

    Theres no need to reach when the facts are right there.

  • That's a lot of big words to be using there little one. You make a lot of claims but you have no evidence to back it up. You clearly have some hostility issues that you need to deal with, therapy might help. Do you know what a CRITICAL-INFERENCE is? Well, it is when someone makes an assertion based on their own SUBJECTIVE perception. Unfortunately you have confused your opinions with facts. You INFERRED that Crowley was a Racist, well prove it.

  • LOL I think you're confusing me for yourself.. I don't abuse "big words" and "make claims with no evidence", but you.. Yet another bozo who's never read a single book of Crowley's and considers himself an authority- I don't know why I argue with you idiots, I suppose it's just to make you look like the half-wits that u are.

    I've already torn apart 3 ignoramii here, you want to be the next, huh?

    Do you know what CLUELESSNESS is?

    Is it SUBJECTIVE that these following statements are racist?:

  • "...we [Brits] always somehow instinctively think of the Italian as a nigger. We dont call them dagos & wops as they do in the US, with the invariable epithet of dirty; but we have the same feeling."

    -Diary of a Drug Fiend, Ch. 9

    "as is set forth the wealthy Jews of England have compassed heaven and earth to suppress, & evidenced by the ever-recurring Pogroms against which so senseless an outcry is made by those who live among those degenerate Jews who are at least not cannibals"

    -777

  • "... We have the gross, hooked, pendulous proboscis; the thick,

    flabby, moist lips; the patient stupid eyes, and timid, hunted

    gait of the bad type of Jew. ... "

    -The Confessions of Aleister Crowley

    "... brainless Scandinavians usually are. The doctor was a

    Bengali named Ram Lal Sircar, a burly nigger of the most

    loathsome type."

    -The Confessions of Aleister Crowley

    Had enough "confusing of opinions with facts"? I can't help being subjective with OBJECTIVE PROOF like this.

  • I find your brand of intolerant fundamentalism very amusing, you could be my little pet, in your own little cage, frothing at the mouth, spouting absurdities, ranting and raving like an imbecile. Crowley, among other things was a wind up merchant with a WICKED sense of humour. Unfortunately his humour is not appreciated by the simple-literal minded hate mongers like yourself. You are abolutely full of hatred, i pity you. And yet again you were making CRITICAL-INFERENCES!

  • Pt.1.

    "yet again you were making CRITICAL-INFERENCES!"

    You're repeating your little buzz-phrase (that you no doubt learnt today from someone else who used that very term against you), providing nothing to negate my quotations; so your comments have become little more than a showcase of your ignorance.

    I was expecting more of a 'tommy' reply with his ignorant "it's ok because everyone was racist back then" responce- at least he didn't repeat non-sensical points.

  • Pt.2.

    "I find your brand of intolerant fundamentalism very amusing"

    Funny how a rational atheist can be a 'fundamentalist' isn't it? As for intolorance- I'll leave that to your dead idol Crowley.

    "You are abolutely full of hatred, i pity you"

    Save your pity for your hero Crowley, he's frying in the hell he believed in now and blowing his god Satan, like you will one day, after practicing all your little "Satanic blood ritual" favourited videos.

  • Pt.3.

    It's nice to see u think his remarks are "WICKED" & "funny", shows just how sick in the head u are & why you're defending him.

    And *I'M* the "simple-literal minded hate monger" because I'm outspoken against his horriffically racist remarks, huh?!?

    You're the one who belongs in a cage.

    As for the subjectivity that u were preaching about- HUMOUR IS SUBJECTIVE YOU WEAK-MINDED CRETIN, but racism can be judged objectively.

    I back up what I say with genuine sources, as opposed to NOTHING.

    FIN.

  • Seriously you need urgent psychiatric treatment. Anyone reading the VERBAL-IDIOCY that you have posted can clearly see that you are not RIGHT IN THE HEAD! I pray for you and hope that some light can be spread to the dark recesses of your SAD little brain. You were at it again claiming that i am a Satanist and that i idolise Crowley. You are a poor deluded fool. I send all my LOVE to you! You obviously need it as you are clearly deprived of affection.

  • All that yet I'm disappointed again to see that you provide no substance, depth, forethought, knowledge- just sentance after sentance of ad hominem attacks, like so many who I have bettered by tongue and 'run away with their tail between their legs'.

    Noted how you aren't talking about Crowley's racism any more... ;)

    I indeed hope people do read our little 'conversation'.

  • You are one funny little man! "ad hominem" The TWAT brings out his Latin. What a RETARD! I said before that you need help and in all honesty you do. May GOD be with you and your EVIL atheistic ways. LOLLOLLOLLOLLOLLOL.

  • Hah, I said it to the previous ignoramus and I'll say it to you:

    "It's better to keep your mouth shut and be thought of as a fool, than to open it and remove all doubt".

    Ad hominem is a commonly used term for piss-poor journalism, "attacks against the man" [not the material he provides or the debate], it's up there with slander, lying, et cetera (oops I used more latin, sorry if you can't get your head round it LOL)

  • Who's a clever boy

  • CHECKMATE!!!!!!

  • All that Techno music has resulted in brain damage. But i congratulate you on the fact that you can read. Why any hospital would employ you is a mystery. You remind me of an illiterate who desperately wants to prove that he is clever. Love is the key to your redemption. I thought a so-called Buddhist would understand that. So instead of spouting hatred and frothing at the mouth perhaps you should try and transcend your self-hatred. It's just a bit of banter, don't take it too SERIOUSLY.

  • You could say "Love is the Law"... huh...? ;)

  • Exactly. Listen, i've enjoyed our verbal sparring and it's not personal, it's just a bit of fun. I think i could actually begin to like you. I happen to be interested in comparative religion, philosophy and psychology and you are good at the verbals, but not as good as i am! LOL. All my love to you. You have been a good case study. If you want to keep it up then that's fine with me.

  • Pt.1.

    Maybe you deserve to know why I am doing this... Over years I've read almost every single thing Crowley published (most more than once), I have deep knowledge of him and the only thing I can say (as objectively as I can, based on all that I know) is- He was a bad man who done and taught bad things [and he seemed to think it was GOOD!], he is not worthy of justification, respect nor even worthy of being listened to by anyone.

  • Pt.2.

    It seems that 'spiritual stuff' is by and large real but misunderstood, and Crowley is most likely the most powerful of his kind in centuries, but I can only come to the conclusion that his works and powers were certainly not adopted with the intention of the betterment of humanity, quite the contrary, to use the correct spiritual term is his deeds were EVIL.

  • Pt.3.

    My personal call based on everything I have seen up unto this point is that he was devoted to Satan and followed everything that he stood for (misery- everything that is bad and without restraint or care), nothing he brought upon the world was good, wholesome, pure- he skillfully decieved and lied throughout his life (and still decieves to this day so it seems).

    This is why I stand firm by my arguments and why I try to inform people about his darkest side.

  • You really have less than "no clue" when it comes to Crowley. "Devoted to Satan"? Give me a break... If you are interested in actually learning about what Crowley believed, and practiced, I sugest putting down the Bob Larson books, getting a dictionary out, and actually trying to comprehend his writings for yourself. In the end you will either learn a thing or two, or else realize you are out of your league, and stick with your jewish scriptures.

  • You favorite a few Thelema vids and suddenly you're an expert on this Satanist, eh budgallant? ;)

    Give me a break bud, I've read almost every thing Crowley ever published.

    Have u ever read the book "The Sacred Magic of Abramelin the Mage"? I thought not. It's the book that told Crowley how to do the ritual in this video, to get demons to do his bidding.

    Crowley was friends with the author, SLM Mathers, until he found he was religious & taught u needed to be pius to work the magic effectively.

  • Cont'd..

    Crowley came up with a varient of Mather's (Abramelin) works, with his own versions of the "Greater/Lesser Keys of Solomon"- but with no ethics or morals, he taught to abuse & pervert the religious teachings to suit your will, spelling out how to do this to get Satan to cause wars, plagues, disasters, and many other sufferings of humanity.

    Mathers was for "white magick", Crowley was for "black magick"- the makers of this vid skim over this fact, trying to make Crowley sound good.

  • The music videos (and that is what this account is for) I have favorited have little to no bearing on the extent of my knowledge of Thelema.

    You claim to have "read almost every thing Crowley ever published". I'm sure this must be some oversight on your part, as Crowley published literally hundreds of different articles and books during his life. I find it hard to believe you could obtain, let alone, read them.

  • Incidentally, I not only have read, but also have in my possession the book you presume I have no familiarity with. I fail to see how The Sacred Magic Of Abramelin The Mage proves your assertion that Crowley was a "Satanist". Jesus commanded "demons", as well. Was Jesus a Satanist? Well, some Jews might think so. Perhaps that is why their Talmud claims he was put to death for being a black magician. You find yourself in some ironic company, it seems.

  • i dont think some people are smart enough and open minded enough to comprehend Crowley's writings themselves

  • You could say the same thing about the back of a McDonald's soda cup.

  • If u are so against irrational belief in ancient myths then why are u for Crowley? He had as many twisted beliefs as anyone could (Ie. he BELIEVED in the AntiChrist, in Pan, in magic etc).

    Its also FACT that he was racist, dabbled with homosexuality, had NO sexual morals, etc

    PS- I dont believe for 1 second that youve read any of his books- u dont know shit about him & are just claiming that so u dont sound clueless (though people like me who know what theyre talking about see thru it instantly)

  • tommy, all that meaningless rhetoric and you didn't mention ONE thing, not one single bloody thing about Crowley; his actions, beliefs or his life.

    It's because you know that I have far grater knowledge of that SoB than you do, and if you say one thing about him I'll once again crush you with truth.

    Amongst your MANY incorrect assertions you assume that I'm religions, that Lincoln was racist, that I'm stupid for pointing out the FACT that Crowley wrote hymns to Satan (I have copies).

    Cont'd..

  • "for the record youre an idiot who thinks way to highly of his own opinion, u demeaning little prick."

    There was a saying made just for you:

    Its better to keep your mouth shut and be thought of as a fool, than to open it & remove all doubt.

    For the record- Dont even talk to me about Crowley. You dont know a single bloody thing- u havent read any of his books, books on him or any reasearch- that or maybe u have & do know your talking shit & are simply a liar, maybe a bastard offspring of his..?

  • "MK Ultra was developed mainly by ex-nazis flown into the US after the war. Crowley was busy dying at the time."

    Crowley was involved with putting out Nazi propaganda during WW2, he was racist too.

    "Tell me, are you getting your 'facts' from Alex Jones or someone like that?"

    If you look through my favorites you'll see that I saved a few videos on "Alex Jones is a Fraud/Liar", etc.

    He's ahead with news, but I am skeptical of much of what he says, also I never get my info from just 1 source.

  • You and me are talking about the same person, right?

    You know, the Aleister Crowley- the Demon obsessed priest of Satan, the guy who was a compulsive addict to both twisted sex and almost every drug under the Sun?

    The Wickedest Man in the World?

    The guy who said ""A white male child of perfect innocence and intelligence makes the most suitable victim."??

    Google Crowleys links with child-molesting leader of the 'Church of Set', Michael Aquino, before passing blind judgement out of ignorance.

  • The 'white male child' is semen you dullard, you are taking an allegorical metaphor literally.

    And again, where is the evidence that Crowley ever abused a child?

    Anyone falsely accused of child abuse deserves to be defended. In Crowley's case I would suggest you read some books and stop getting your information from the web,it is nought more than heresay and urban myth, as are most 'facts' on the internet.

  • From a simple look at your favorites, everything becomes clear, as though 'pulling it out of the ether' like Crowley!

    You're clearly into the occult & Crowleys teachings (The Golden Dawn/Thelema) & I'm smashing your little perceptions of your little racist, drug & sex fiend hero and u can't take it, so u don't listen to a word I say and provide nothing of any substance as your rebuttal.

    Where is the evidence that Crowley used the term 'white male child' as a metaphor for semen, you simpleton?

  • Plus is is very much fact about Michael Aquino and Crowley not 'myth', but being as narrow-minded as you are, you obviously didn't even spend 2 minutes looking it up.

  • I'm not aware of any 'links' between Crowley and Aquino.

    You do realise that Crowley died in 1947 don't you?

  • Aquino idolizes Crowley and his 'techniques'- he's done many works on Crowley and his writings.

    Like Crowley he's very in to in Satanism, Sexual magick and the Thelemic 'Do what thou wilt'.

    He was a member of LaVeys Church of Satan, and further influenced by Crowleys teachings, the OTO, etc, into bringing the nazi-esque "Temple of Set" into being.

    Seems to be a few 'links' there between Crowley and MK Ultra (admitted military/CIA mind control by sex & drug abuse operation) insider Aquino, no?

  • MK Ultra was developed mainly by ex-nazis flown into the US after the war. Crowley was busy dying at the time.

    Tell me, are you getting your 'facts' from Alex Jones or someone like that?

  • Crowley neither had any beliefs in satan or any ties to satanism. and for the record you're an idiot who thinks way to highly of his own opinion, you demeaning little prick.

  • "Crowley neither had any beliefs in satan or any ties to satanism"

    Funny considering how he wrote hymns/prayers to Lucifer and Pan, who are both generally considered to be Satan, or at least closely related.

    "why do you say "he intented to bring the AntiChrist in to being" like it's a bad thing?"

    Wow, just wow. It's written that in the time of the AntiChrist the vast majority of the planet (all non-christians) die. Bah, I guess you're just an end-timer fanatic who thinks that's a good thing.

  • " guess you're just an end-timer fanatic who thinks that's a good thing. "

    no, i'm a realist who doesn't worry about jewish fairy tales coming true. ALL religion is false. people who promote or defend it are guilty of not only holding us back as a species but of countless atrocities. there is no excuse, no more time for exceptance. Logic must be embraced, and religion cast aside like the out dated lies all self-thinking people know it to be.

  • "Funny considering how he wrote hymns/prayers to Lucifer and Pan, who are both generally considered to be Satan, or at least closely related."

    this is so stupid i don't think i even need to comment.

  • You can find it stated in the letters that form the content of 'Magick Without Tears'.

    Crowley speaks at length about the allegorical sex-magickal nature of alchemy, it is only natural that his writing style should reflect that.

    In truth it is a myth that has been thoroughly rebuffed by all of his biographers.

    You appear to be basing your entire opinion of the man on coverage from the Daily Express. Now, I ask you, is that a reputable source?

  • I am unaware of anything confirming what u claim, care to reference a chapter?

    Under the chapter Sex Morality he states-

    "The "moral" side.  As in the case of the voltage of a cissoid, there isn't one. Mind your own business!

    The Magical side. Sex is...the most powerful weapon in the armoury of the Magician; & precisely because there is no moral guide, it is indescribably dangerous."

    Still persistant that a man who self-admittedly has NO sexual morals couldnt possibly have molested children?

  • You are simply repeating nonsense that you have read on the idiotnet and claiming that it is fact.

    Every accusation that you make is mythical, you are simply parroting urban myths.

    I think I'm getting the measure of you after the MK Ultra remark.

    Go outside, get some friends and stop believing everything that you read on the idiotnet.

  • "You are simply repeating nonsense that you have read on the idiotnet and claiming that it is fact."

    I'm not repeating myself.

    "Every accusation that you make is mythical, you are simply parroting urban myths."

    Nope- I'm quoting from 'Magick Without Tears'.

    "I think I'm getting the measure of you after the MK Ultra remark."

    MK Ultra is very much fact, government/CIA individuals lost lawsuits for their part in the sexual abuse program, and Aquino was involved too.

    I never said Crowley was.

  • Is the priest suggesting that Crowley brought the Loch ness monster into being via the Abramelin Ritual?

  • kreepy clown painting towards the end

  • I note how they don't mention the racism, allegations of child molestation, or him writing a book on how he intented to bring the AntiChrist in to being, and how his own Mother referred to him as "the Beast", a title which he sometimes used to refer to himself as.

  • I would be fascinated to learn the source of those 'allegations of child molestation', would you be kind enough to supply a reference?

  • It's simple enough to type into google "aliester crowley child molestation".

    That'll find you 1000s of sources.

  • I did as you instructed and found only accusations, no-one seems to quote an actual case.

    I have also noticed that the allegation seems to be largely confined to websites of the "christian" right, particularly the sites of right-wing fundamentalist conspiracy theorists Tex Marrs, Jeff Rense and Alex Jones; not the best source for unbiased information.

    An uncharitable soul might be lead to conclude that you are knowingly perpetuating a falsehood.

    A sin surely?

  • Note that it's also FACT that it's been alledged that he abused children, which is what I said.

    How.. simple, that you should imply a connection between myself and "right-wing fundamentalist conspiracy theorists"!

    I'd call myself a modorate progressive who thinks freely, to be straight with you.

    I consider things from all angles, left-wing, right-wing and no-wing and take the most rational explaination upon weighing up all what I see.

    I have read a lot on Crowley, he's no man to defend.

  • When is this alleged to have happened and with whom? Who made the initial accusation, was it investigated, if not, why not?

    Where is a single verifiable shred of evidence to support this absurd allegation that you are so obsessed with repeating?

    I'd say that you really need to improve your critical faculties when it comes to discussing one of the most maligned and lied men in British history.

    You cannot base anything on things that you have read online, 90% of the internet is just urban myth.

  • who wasn't racist in his time? you can say anyone from the past was accused of something but if you have no source to site you should logically conclude that it is indeterminable or a myth, and why do you say "he intented to bring the AntiChrist in to being" like it's a bad thing?

  • "who wasn't racist in his time?"

    There were many people BEFORE his time who weren't racist- I.e. Lincoln.

    According to your argument does that make it ok huh?

    "you can say anyone from the past was accused of something but if you have no source to site you should logically conclude that it is..myth"

    Plenty of sources- Crowley often stuck his foot in it, actually, wrote incriminating things in his own books. Why don't u read his "Book of Lies", or "Diary of a Drug Fiend", like I did? No myth.

  • lincoln? are you retarded? lincoln was just as racist as everyone else, if you're one of those people who thinks the civil war had anything to do with freeing slaves then i don't know why i'm bothering to argue...my point about racism in the past is that you can look at alot of different figures from history who are regarded as great and the majority of them would be considered racist by todays standards.

  • i own both books, as well as several others, and your juvenille reply trying to challenge what i know about the subject doesn't hold up. more than one person has asked you to provide a source for your accusations and you can't do it. you even tried misinterpreting one of his metaphors to support your case, i think it's pretty obvious you are reaching...

  • dude the number of views when i'm watching this is 666. weird :o

  • There are parts of his diary published, as well as his autobiography, and loads of biographys, the latter mostly quite bad, though. Read his books to know the man...

  • Thanks for the info. You sound like you know more about Crowely than I do.

  • Diary of a Drug feind is about his most asscesable book, i started there. Still not finished researching him, he's damn fascinating....

  • k i kno he published the book of the law but i dunno bout the diary it was probably never publisheed

  • has crowley realised a biograpghy book

  • Crowely is long dead. He had released a bunch of books before his death all of them dealing with the occult. There was a diary that he kept. I don't know if it's published.

  • I've finished uploading the whole thing. I have another A. Crowely biography coming soon.

  • yeah it will be up

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more