After the first vision, Jesus and I went to a different part of hell. Jesus said, "These things you are seeing are for the end times." Another vision appeared before me.
We walked up a high, dry hill. At the top of the hill, I looked below and saw a swirling river. There were no pits of fire or demons or evil spirits, only the large river flowing between unseen banks. The banks of the river were hidden in the darkness. Jesus and I walked closer to the river, and I saw that it was full of blood and fire.
They were men loving men, and women loving women, who would not repent and be saved from their sin. They enjoyed their life of sin and spumed My salvation."
I stood beside Jesus and looked into the lake of fire. The fire began to roar like a great furnace, moving and devouring everything in its path. Soon it filled nearly the entire right arm of hell.
The fire approached to within feet of us, but I did not touch us. The river was burning everything in its path. I watched Jesus' face, and it was sad and tender. He still had love and compassion for these lost souls written on His countenance. I began to cry and wished I could leave this place of torment, to go on was almost unbearable.
I looked again at the souls in the fire. They were a fiery red, and their bones were blackened and burned. I heard their souls cry out in regret and sorrow.
The Lord said, "This is their torment. Chain after chain, they are linked together. These desired the flesh of their own kind, men with men, and women with women, doing that which is unnatural. They led many young girls and young boys into acts of sin. They called it love, but in the end it was sin and death.
"I know that many boys and girls, men and women were forced against their wills to commit such atrocious acts-I know and will not hold this sin to their charge. Remember this though," said Jesus, "I know all things, and the persons who made these youths to sin have the greater punishment. I will judge righteously. 'to the sinner, I say, 'Repent, and I will have mercy. Call on Me and I will hear.'
"Time after time I called to these souls to repent and to come unto Me. I would have forgiven them and cleansed them; and in My name they could have been set free. But they would not listen to Me. They wanted the lust of the flesh more than the love of the living God. Because I am holy, you must be holy. 'touch not the unclean thing, and I will receive you," said the Lord.
I felt very sick as I looked at the souls in the lake of fire.
"If only they had turned to Me before it was too late," Jesus continued. "My blood was shed so that everyone could come to Me. I gave My life that even the vilest of sinners might live."
Multitudes of souls went by in the river of flames. Over and under the waves of fire, they went' with no way out of the burning and swimming in the lake of fire. I heard cries of regret as the bloody river flowed by us.
God wants you to know about hell, and He wants to save you from that place. God wants you to know you have a way out. That way is Jesus Christ, the Savior of your soul. Remember, only those with their names written in the Lamb's Book of Life will be saved.
what do you mean racist and gay? Because obviously i am fine with one and not at all with the other. I mean if your a queer well ..... joke but seriously thwe racist part was a joke huh?
Topic wise: I am curious what you think of the movie titled "The Take" about Argentinean worker co-operatives (and the co-operative factories themselves)
As to the police violence, that sounds like what policing systems seem to develop/devolve into (depending on your opinion) when it comes to protests, everywhere; disappointingly.
Technically you have belief, since it's testable, faith by definition (apparently) isn't)
And yeah, fuck'em they should show both sides, and respect ALL citizens.
About gay civil union in Brazil: Just to be clear, it is not a new law, just a "reinterpretation" of the law, because the law is not clearly saying that a civil union is supposed to be only between a man and a woman.
It is a hack. And it does not work very well because 1) anti-gay people say it was unconstitutional 2) it is not the same as marriage (in a few cases) and 3) some judges are refusing to follow this decision from the Supreme Court.
That was interesting. I'm used to these discussions within the USA, but know little about the politics and legal grounds on which other countries debate these matters.
Are you still considering making Communism your desired economic system, or have you figured out yet that it's completely unworkable? (See what I did there? Hehheh.)
Well, the Supreme Court actually voted that the walks in favor of the decriminalization of marijuana and other drugs are constitutional, so they cannot be legally suppressed by the police anymore.
There is no way to win this battle, until we get democracy by selecting the representatives by dice. People that want to represent you are by definition biased. Lets have a lottery to choose the representatives - it would be a duty to serve. It seems to me that a great majority if people are too smart to get involved with politucs like it is today and all we get is the worst of the power hungry bastards.
@TiradeFaction Thats an intresting question, I think it would be a good video too, but I may take some time cause I need to do some reseach on it, cause I only have a vague idea about it and I wouldnt like to give an uninformed opinion about it! I'll have some time in july after my finals, maybe I can do it then.
@danihc No problem. I am just recently reading a book on the changing hands of politics in Latin America, it is interesting, and the MST movement in Brazil stuck out with me, so I was just curious since you live in Brazil yourself..:D
@GrapplingIgnorance Get with the feminist movement, Richie. Women are no longer pieces of meat. They cook meat...as well as potatoes, bread, pies and whatever else we them. Hey, there's an idea. Dani, do a video about roasting a duck.
I think someone with your large amount of knowledge and experience about this vast and exploratory topic would provide some insight to those less educated on the issue.
Sorry what I meant to say is that if they let gay people marry without any kind of discrimination, they would do it just for the novelty when they weren't really serious about it, and there would be so many marriages and so many divources happening every day that it would overwhelm the system. That is why they have to make sure that they are really serious about it and will actually stay together for at least a good few years.
@CMO999 that doesnt make any sense, firts, it's a RIGHT, secondly, why is it ok for straight people to marry and divorce whenever they fucking want? if it was because of that then EVERYONE (gay or straight) should have to prove a stable relationship to get married, you know that is bs.
@danihc I'll try to explain.. when a traditional heterosexual couple marries, it is a major life decision. The families get involved, they plan for the future, it is a pivotal moment in their lives. It is not necessarily so with homosexual couples. It could be, of course, but it could also be more of a novel thing to do. I could marry my boyfriend in defiance of my family's values, thinking at the time that it was romantic, and then despise him a few weeks later and file for a divorce.
@CMO999 "I could marry my boyfriend in defiance of my family's values, thinking at the time that it was romantic, and then despise him a few weeks later and file for a divorce. " Lol, and this doesn't happen in heterosexual relationships all..the...time?
@TiradeFaction I find it strange that being 'politicly correct' is so important to some people that the need to appear politicly correct supersedes rationality. Are you capable of even thinking about the point I made on administrative logistics, or is the barrier in your mind so strong that you cannot even consider the daya? "It cannot be part of the equation because it does not seem politicly correct!"
@CMO999 Oh please, you've provided zero data whatsoever. How about providing some before you blow steam out of your ass with the "You're POLITICAL CORRECT!!!" accusations.
@TiradeFaction I don't think you even know what I'm talking about. I don't think you really want to talk to me either, you seem to be just swearing and disagreeing with whatever I say just for the sake of it. Go away.
@CMO999 No, I have been reading your comments. You've not given any sources, whatsoever. And then you just went with the tired old "politically correct", then whine that I'm swearing? How ironic.
@danihc Now, I know that the same thing could happen with heterosexual couples. Of course it could! Statisticly speaking, however, it is far more likely for homosexuals to have more and shorter lasting relationships. And, since this is all new, uncharted territory, it must be done carefully, with failsafes in place to avoid calamity. In the future it will change, of course. All I'm saying is that I understand the rationale behind doing that, and although it is not P.C., it does have purpose.
@CMO999 Do you have any data to support your claim that "statisticly, homosexuals have more shorter lasting relationhips"? Generaly speaking the divorce rates tend to be around 50% most places, if you look up the divorce rate in homosexual marrige where its legal, you will see that they are much lower than the general statictics.
@danihc That is because homosexual MEN statisticly have the shortest relationships, but homosexual WOMEN statisticly have the longest relationships, more so than typical heterosexual couples. Anyways, I am not talking about what is ethical, or whatever, all I am saying is that I can see why they started with that, for administrative purposes. It will change in time. It does make sense to start it off that way, though.
@CMO999 As far as I'm aware, there is no "tendency" for gay relationships to be less stable, not statisticaly, not in any way...But show me some evidence that this is a real tendency and I may change my mind. But that would still not change my opinion about that the right to get married shoule be equal (and if the expenses are a real problem, ALL couples should be seperated analized and judeged as a stable relationship, if gay people have to go throu it, straight people should too)
It takes a lot of administrative resources to marry and unmarry people, and if they let just any gay couple just go and get married any old time, people wouldn't be doing it just for the novelty when they weren't really going to stay together for very long, and there would be thousands of extra marriages and resources every day - there is simply not the administrative resources to handle that.
Brazil is a great place to go for sex with underage girls with phat asses.
sylarwins 3 months ago
HEY, BRAZILIAN LADY, WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO WHEN THE ANTICHRIST TO SHOW HIMSELF UP ON THIS PLANET?
WILL YOU RECEIVE THE MARK OF THE BEAST ON YOUR FOREHEAD?
SURE, YOU WILL!
osenhortodopoderoso 5 months ago
@osenhortodopoderoso ppffffff bullshit!
adnanrefolhaif 3 months ago
After the first vision, Jesus and I went to a different part of hell. Jesus said, "These things you are seeing are for the end times." Another vision appeared before me.
Jesus said, "We are in the right arm of hell."
osenhortodopoderoso 5 months ago
We walked up a high, dry hill. At the top of the hill, I looked below and saw a swirling river. There were no pits of fire or demons or evil spirits, only the large river flowing between unseen banks. The banks of the river were hidden in the darkness. Jesus and I walked closer to the river, and I saw that it was full of blood and fire.
osenhortodopoderoso 5 months ago
As I looked closer, I saw many souls, each chained to another. The weight of the chains dragged them under the surface of the lake of fire.
The souls in hell were in the fire of hell. I saw also that they were in the form of skeletons with misty gray souls.
osenhortodopoderoso 5 months ago
"What is this?" I asked the Lord.
"These are the souls of the unbelievers and the ungodly. These were lovers of their own flesh more than lovers of God.
osenhortodopoderoso 5 months ago
They were men loving men, and women loving women, who would not repent and be saved from their sin. They enjoyed their life of sin and spumed My salvation."
osenhortodopoderoso 5 months ago
I stood beside Jesus and looked into the lake of fire. The fire began to roar like a great furnace, moving and devouring everything in its path. Soon it filled nearly the entire right arm of hell.
osenhortodopoderoso 5 months ago
The fire approached to within feet of us, but I did not touch us. The river was burning everything in its path. I watched Jesus' face, and it was sad and tender. He still had love and compassion for these lost souls written on His countenance. I began to cry and wished I could leave this place of torment, to go on was almost unbearable.
osenhortodopoderoso 5 months ago
I looked again at the souls in the fire. They were a fiery red, and their bones were blackened and burned. I heard their souls cry out in regret and sorrow.
osenhortodopoderoso 5 months ago
The Lord said, "This is their torment. Chain after chain, they are linked together. These desired the flesh of their own kind, men with men, and women with women, doing that which is unnatural. They led many young girls and young boys into acts of sin. They called it love, but in the end it was sin and death.
osenhortodopoderoso 5 months ago
"I know that many boys and girls, men and women were forced against their wills to commit such atrocious acts-I know and will not hold this sin to their charge. Remember this though," said Jesus, "I know all things, and the persons who made these youths to sin have the greater punishment. I will judge righteously. 'to the sinner, I say, 'Repent, and I will have mercy. Call on Me and I will hear.'
osenhortodopoderoso 5 months ago
"Time after time I called to these souls to repent and to come unto Me. I would have forgiven them and cleansed them; and in My name they could have been set free. But they would not listen to Me. They wanted the lust of the flesh more than the love of the living God. Because I am holy, you must be holy. 'touch not the unclean thing, and I will receive you," said the Lord.
osenhortodopoderoso 5 months ago
I felt very sick as I looked at the souls in the lake of fire.
"If only they had turned to Me before it was too late," Jesus continued. "My blood was shed so that everyone could come to Me. I gave My life that even the vilest of sinners might live."
osenhortodopoderoso 5 months ago
Multitudes of souls went by in the river of flames. Over and under the waves of fire, they went' with no way out of the burning and swimming in the lake of fire. I heard cries of regret as the bloody river flowed by us.
osenhortodopoderoso 5 months ago
God wants you to know about hell, and He wants to save you from that place. God wants you to know you have a way out. That way is Jesus Christ, the Savior of your soul. Remember, only those with their names written in the Lamb's Book of Life will be saved.
osenhortodopoderoso 5 months ago
what do you mean racist and gay? Because obviously i am fine with one and not at all with the other. I mean if your a queer well ..... joke but seriously thwe racist part was a joke huh?
seanieboy78 5 months ago
Topic wise: I am curious what you think of the movie titled "The Take" about Argentinean worker co-operatives (and the co-operative factories themselves)
As to the police violence, that sounds like what policing systems seem to develop/devolve into (depending on your opinion) when it comes to protests, everywhere; disappointingly.
Technically you have belief, since it's testable, faith by definition (apparently) isn't)
And yeah, fuck'em they should show both sides, and respect ALL citizens.
PurpleGhost 7 months ago
talk about your l33t hair ;D
AbusiveAntitheist 7 months ago
About gay civil union in Brazil: Just to be clear, it is not a new law, just a "reinterpretation" of the law, because the law is not clearly saying that a civil union is supposed to be only between a man and a woman.
It is a hack. And it does not work very well because 1) anti-gay people say it was unconstitutional 2) it is not the same as marriage (in a few cases) and 3) some judges are refusing to follow this decision from the Supreme Court.
gugamilare 8 months ago
What do Brazil have ?, Aryton Senna, Ruben Barrichello, Royce Gracie, Wanderlei Silva.
And that's it.
PS: Stop changing your hair color, You look like a Ramona Flowers in a anime convention =P.
bloodangel13 8 months ago
That was interesting. I'm used to these discussions within the USA, but know little about the politics and legal grounds on which other countries debate these matters.
VeryEvilPettingZoo 8 months ago
How about we try and get you to run Brazil? :P
StanMarsh1 8 months ago
@StanMarsh1 hai, I would like to run a dictatorship tho lol
danihc 8 months ago
@danihc are you from ireland? because when I see you my penis be dublin.
fishbone937 2 months ago
Wtf is brazil?
Failcard 8 months ago
Are you still considering making Communism your desired economic system, or have you figured out yet that it's completely unworkable? (See what I did there? Hehheh.)
Zaunstar 8 months ago
@Zaunstar lol I'm still thinking about it
danihc 8 months ago
Brazilian waxes, it would be hilarious to see you get one.
Brazilian beach babes.
Brazilian surf
The Amazon
Ohhhhh so much stuff.
edgewayround 8 months ago
Talk about the weather in Brazil. Also, what constelations are out at night?
charlesfloyb 8 months ago
Your hair is sex.
zegeck 8 months ago
@danihc you shut your mouth when you're addressing me
fishbone937 8 months ago
Well, the Supreme Court actually voted that the walks in favor of the decriminalization of marijuana and other drugs are constitutional, so they cannot be legally suppressed by the police anymore.
multimarker 8 months ago
About local stuff, how is brazil about religion and atheism.
I do not know much about Brazil, besides the Carneval. :)
Also I missed you DAnihc!
Tylzen 8 months ago
your vagina.
Haradin32 8 months ago
When you say manifestations I think you mean demonstrations.
As far as suggestions about what you can talk about, I do like when you talk about Brazil because that is kind of your area of expertise.
QuantumDarkness 8 months ago
There is no way to win this battle, until we get democracy by selecting the representatives by dice. People that want to represent you are by definition biased. Lets have a lottery to choose the representatives - it would be a duty to serve. It seems to me that a great majority if people are too smart to get involved with politucs like it is today and all we get is the worst of the power hungry bastards.
lolingattheism 8 months ago
This might be a weird one, but what are your thoughts of the MST movement in Brazil? Might make a worthwhile video...:P
TiradeFaction 8 months ago
@TiradeFaction Thats an intresting question, I think it would be a good video too, but I may take some time cause I need to do some reseach on it, cause I only have a vague idea about it and I wouldnt like to give an uninformed opinion about it! I'll have some time in july after my finals, maybe I can do it then.
danihc 8 months ago
@danihc No problem. I am just recently reading a book on the changing hands of politics in Latin America, it is interesting, and the MST movement in Brazil stuck out with me, so I was just curious since you live in Brazil yourself..:D
TiradeFaction 8 months ago
@TiradeFaction That's cool, I'll try to do something good, it's an oportunity to learn more about my own country as well
danihc 8 months ago
ZOMG you're hair is soooo sexy. Wait... women aren't pieces of meat? I'll have to consult Wikipedia about that.
You should make more videos juuuust like this one.
GrapplingIgnorance 8 months ago
@GrapplingIgnorance aww <3
danihc 8 months ago
@GrapplingIgnorance Get with the feminist movement, Richie. Women are no longer pieces of meat. They cook meat...as well as potatoes, bread, pies and whatever else we them. Hey, there's an idea. Dani, do a video about roasting a duck.
PJsCreed 8 months ago
You blew my ears out : ( Dani LOL
And not all gay people have short relationships, that is not true cmo. Think with that brain you have.
krapptacular 8 months ago
@krapptacular sorry!! xD
danihc 8 months ago
Secular faith? WTF?
IDontEatSoap 8 months ago
"Cause no one is getting offended. Yeah. FUCK YOU. I'm offended." ~ Dani.
Yessacmidnight 8 months ago
I like listening to you talk. Make more videos!!
CMO999 8 months ago
educational reform and what it would impact in brazil
jmm1233 8 months ago
It is unjust but it's lightyears ahead of us.
BTW, the hair is an excellent look for you.
DeathofSpeech 8 months ago
ARRRGH !
You have manga hair !!!!!!!!!!
chthonios 8 months ago
Talk about Boobs.
I think someone with your large amount of knowledge and experience about this vast and exploratory topic would provide some insight to those less educated on the issue.
Yessacmidnight 8 months ago
Sorry what I meant to say is that if they let gay people marry without any kind of discrimination, they would do it just for the novelty when they weren't really serious about it, and there would be so many marriages and so many divources happening every day that it would overwhelm the system. That is why they have to make sure that they are really serious about it and will actually stay together for at least a good few years.
CMO999 8 months ago
@CMO999 that doesnt make any sense, firts, it's a RIGHT, secondly, why is it ok for straight people to marry and divorce whenever they fucking want? if it was because of that then EVERYONE (gay or straight) should have to prove a stable relationship to get married, you know that is bs.
danihc 8 months ago
@danihc I'll try to explain.. when a traditional heterosexual couple marries, it is a major life decision. The families get involved, they plan for the future, it is a pivotal moment in their lives. It is not necessarily so with homosexual couples. It could be, of course, but it could also be more of a novel thing to do. I could marry my boyfriend in defiance of my family's values, thinking at the time that it was romantic, and then despise him a few weeks later and file for a divorce.
CMO999 8 months ago
@CMO999 "I could marry my boyfriend in defiance of my family's values, thinking at the time that it was romantic, and then despise him a few weeks later and file for a divorce. " Lol, and this doesn't happen in heterosexual relationships all..the...time?
TiradeFaction 8 months ago
@TiradeFaction If you would have only kept reading ONE more line, I covered that in my next comment.
CMO999 8 months ago
@CMO999 Ah yeah, Danihc addressed that bullshit already, so no need for me to further comment.
TiradeFaction 8 months ago
@TiradeFaction I find it strange that being 'politicly correct' is so important to some people that the need to appear politicly correct supersedes rationality. Are you capable of even thinking about the point I made on administrative logistics, or is the barrier in your mind so strong that you cannot even consider the daya? "It cannot be part of the equation because it does not seem politicly correct!"
CMO999 8 months ago
@CMO999 Oh please, you've provided zero data whatsoever. How about providing some before you blow steam out of your ass with the "You're POLITICAL CORRECT!!!" accusations.
TiradeFaction 8 months ago
@TiradeFaction I don't think you even know what I'm talking about. I don't think you really want to talk to me either, you seem to be just swearing and disagreeing with whatever I say just for the sake of it. Go away.
CMO999 8 months ago
@CMO999 No, I have been reading your comments. You've not given any sources, whatsoever. And then you just went with the tired old "politically correct", then whine that I'm swearing? How ironic.
TiradeFaction 8 months ago
@danihc Now, I know that the same thing could happen with heterosexual couples. Of course it could! Statisticly speaking, however, it is far more likely for homosexuals to have more and shorter lasting relationships. And, since this is all new, uncharted territory, it must be done carefully, with failsafes in place to avoid calamity. In the future it will change, of course. All I'm saying is that I understand the rationale behind doing that, and although it is not P.C., it does have purpose.
CMO999 8 months ago
@CMO999 Do you have any data to support your claim that "statisticly, homosexuals have more shorter lasting relationhips"? Generaly speaking the divorce rates tend to be around 50% most places, if you look up the divorce rate in homosexual marrige where its legal, you will see that they are much lower than the general statictics.
danihc 8 months ago
@danihc That is because homosexual MEN statisticly have the shortest relationships, but homosexual WOMEN statisticly have the longest relationships, more so than typical heterosexual couples. Anyways, I am not talking about what is ethical, or whatever, all I am saying is that I can see why they started with that, for administrative purposes. It will change in time. It does make sense to start it off that way, though.
CMO999 8 months ago
@CMO999 As far as I'm aware, there is no "tendency" for gay relationships to be less stable, not statisticaly, not in any way...But show me some evidence that this is a real tendency and I may change my mind. But that would still not change my opinion about that the right to get married shoule be equal (and if the expenses are a real problem, ALL couples should be seperated analized and judeged as a stable relationship, if gay people have to go throu it, straight people should too)
danihc 8 months ago
It takes a lot of administrative resources to marry and unmarry people, and if they let just any gay couple just go and get married any old time, people wouldn't be doing it just for the novelty when they weren't really going to stay together for very long, and there would be thousands of extra marriages and resources every day - there is simply not the administrative resources to handle that.
CMO999 8 months ago