So lame, it's not like these effects can't be done without Physx, it's just a scam for Nvidia to make more money, they pay off the devs to make all of these particle effects with Physx that they could make without, that way, when the game comes out they shit on ATI users.
It's actually pretty immature when you think about it,
retards! the one with OFF above it has the particles off! I mean WHY would you have a game with a gun called the powerfull water gun when my piss diameter is wider? The graphics has been turned down, rename this to [game name] bad vs max quality for all i care
just so u all know what Nvidia shows off with "PhysX" can all be done by using CPU based Physics like Havok, which has also been proven to take less performance off.
The game uses SPH simulation. The only other game that produces similar fluids is Crazy Machines 2. And it relies on GPU PhysX as well. SPH is very slow on CPUs. Give Realflow a whirl (no pun intended) and compare its speed to some of the stuff Nvidia does in realtime. It's night and day.
Dirt 3 has some impressive particle effect's, and the best part, it don't need PhysX and runs at 60FPS without a extra card. Nvidia's closed door approach has only hindered them.
Physx is one of the biggest gimmicks ever... There's only like 3 games that actually use it, and none of those games even has the best physics of any game whatsoever.
Take a look at games like Crysis (the first one), and Portal 2... Those games have great physics, and they don't even use Physx at all.
People have even RECOMMENDED that I use an extra videocard as a dedicated Physx GPU. The only game I have that uses Physx is Metro 2033, and I can't even really tell a difference.
@RalphCQ PhysX is not a gimmick. It does enhance gameplay greatly. The fact that there aren't many games that support PhysX and that the frame rates drop massively with PhysX enabled, isn't really the fault of the technology itself. The technology itself is very sound and impressive, we just need more games supporting PhysX and more powerful cards that won't drop frames significantly with PhysX enabled.
That's very misleading because everything on the physx side can be done without physx in most engines. I've made similar effects with bouncing particles in the UE3 without the need for any physics card. Simply disabling particles all-together in the game then saying "look, only physx can do this!" is very misleading and just plain untrue Water doesn't flow in this game, they're simply transparent particles which bounce around for 1-2 seconds then fade away.
@iSOBigD a processor can do everything physx can do, just slower. A cpu doesn't have the same calculating capacity as a gpu which is why physx is used to take some of the workload off of the cpu and put it on the gpu.
@marski1337 Right, but in these examples, everything shows on the physx side can be done on an average CPU at a good frame rate within a game. It's simply an unfair, biased, rigged "comparisson".
@iSOBigD Yeah, I get you. I'm using a quad core cpu but since I have a physx gpu as well I just tend to use that if it's available in the game. This comparison is maybe a bit biased in that it should have had like a gazillion million crashing particles rendered both on cpu alone and then in physx. Then we would've seen a drop in frame rate on the cpu side.
@iSOBigD I get where you going and I think your right but UE3 is not good example because it's also based on the physx engine (but off course you can do this effect without the phicx enige). also it isn't like you need a separate graphics card (at leat if you have a nvidia card). but i hate the monopole from nvidia on this engine as well!
@iSOBigD Exactly what I was going to say. Drives me crazy when game developers say "you need a physics card for that", when all they are doing is adding particle physics... which has been around for years.
@iSOBigD I think you're a bit of an idiot. Could cryostasis do more that it did without physx? Yes, and it do what physx can without physx? No. Companies use physx because it's the all around best way to use particle physics effects, and it looks damn good, and it's easy. Using a complex work around for something that looks worse in the end, isn't worth it. So most companies just say "use physx or get no good graphics at all"
@onefrozenheart You really have no clue what you're talking about. Physx is about physics, it has nothing to do with graphics. You can make great special effects that don't interact with other objects and you'd need no physics engine of any kind - plus the game would run faster. Physics just allow for interaction between objects, in this case, particles. If there's no physical interaction, you don't need a physics engine. Graphics don't need physics.
@iSOBigD you can get dumber over time! COOL! Maybe you should re-read my comment. The only graphics related thing I said was my end quote, which is true, physx, particles, no physx, no particles (or way less particle effects) therefore, no physx means worse graphics, that is true, for cryostasis, and was the companies decision to do that. I also said physx looks good, which is true, the particles interacting in the world with other things, does look good
@iSOBigD Then you wouldn't mind doing this for each and every company that has to make a game with particle effects that interact with in game geometry? I for one like the way this looks, most people seem to like this video, and it cuts down on programing time for developers.
@oflaherty117 It doesn't cut down on anything, it's an on/off switch just like before. They're simply accelerated by a video card so they can have more interactive particles at once. That's literally all it is. The point is the video simply has particles off then particles on. It's not a physx on/off comparison at all.
@oflaherty117 In theory... However there are several games that look much better with PhysX where such effects are not available without proper hardware... NVidia is often paying them for that.
You could always try cracked/hacked version of PhysX... it works flawlessly... it is just NVidia blocking/disabling hardware support if it can find graphic card made by competition.
@iwhitecastle nope, this is an nvidia technology, although its all just marketing. i wouldnt be surprised if ati have something exactly the same just called a different name.
@kahuna3901 no, ati hasn't got a 3d technology that works as well as nvidias 3d vision nor do they support physx or something similar. I just bought myself a 560ti - finally i can play this game with activated physx :D
@MartinGro131 PhysX will so be phased out because more companies go with Havok now a days which does the same thing just less performance draining and works on both cards. Also the way ATI's 3D works is the same as Nvidia the only thing they dont have is the classes yet, which 3rd party companies are making that work with all monitors.
@kahuna3901 technically its Agiea technology which was around before Nvidia bought them making PhysX to work on both ATI and Nvidia at the time. Nvidia bought the rights to them so they can say they have something that the competition dosnt, which will be phased out by havok because most game dev's dont like to create a bias on their games. Overall the amount of times that PhysX is placed in a game now dosnt warrant buying a Nvidia card just for PhysX or ur a blind man.
@ninjaturtle205 Huh? Yes, this is them showing what they can do with Physx, but it's not really a gimmick. Like reflections, soft shadows, and dynamic lightings/shadows, this can make a game look far better, making the player feel like they are playing in a more responsive world.
@MordeaniisChaos True that PhysX does add more to the game but this can also be done with Havok which is a CPU based physics generator, which is also why companies like to go with havok over PhysX
I also agree with what others said about PhysX being a scam. I played Mirror's Edge with and without PhysX and while there were very minor graphics improvements, they made framerate unnecessarily slower. The improvements also had no effect on gameplay at all, so whats the point?
This game does have locations where you can see good physics like this, ok, but overall the game is very poorly tested and runs very poorly. Maybe some later indoors levels are good, but I played thorugh first two areas (outside, indoors, first enemies appear) and it was buggy as hell.
@ISetYourFaceOnFire PhysX is an nVidia only feature that makes physics in games look more beautiful. Only a few games like Batman Arkham Asylum and Cryostasis use it, but it's a cool feature when you have an nVidia grahpics card and one of those games.
@ISetYourFaceOnFire no not all games are going to have it just games pretty much that are made for Nvidia users and btw MAFIA 2 with PhysX on high Owns all!
@TheBraden1996 Right...Name 2 other reasons. Just a small grasp out of the many reasons why ATI owns nVidia, faster, cheaper (except the well positioned GTX 460), cooler and therefore quiter, way less power consumption, ATI brings out new cards more than once in a decade. Actually, next generation comes out in just 2 weeks. This will undoubtly slaughter the GTX460/465, as it is said the HD6870 will replace the HD5770 on it's pricepoint, but will offer HD5870 performance.
oh so u cant have physx unless you have a nvidia card well guess its a good thing a had a gtx 285 put im my pc instead of that ati he was going to put in it :S
@12x8u I ditto this, as a Nvidia owner I can say myself that Physx is a highly unoptimized gimmick that could be simulated quite easily and lag free with a simple cpu.
@wariofan279 with DX11 and more recent updates with Havok and Cry 3 engine, physx is pretty much useless. not to mention Physx is about 10x more to implement than Havok and other engines, hence why only a VERY few games use it.
It looks worse than it would because they used virtually no other standard of hardware physics when Nv Physx is disabled.
They didn't even use Havoc! They would have you think it's this bad without Nv's Physx, which is entirely untrue.
ATI has hardware physics support, but it is opensource, they working on an open standard, so game developers don't have to pay $ to use it. Lets just hope developers get on board.
More people will have access to hardware physics, and dev's won't have to pay.
i am up to level 8 but havent seen anything like that and i have installed physX and have turned it on in the options but still nothing is it because i have an ATI mobility radeon graphics card? do i need an NVIDIA card?
Oh, I just bought this. Comparing the water cannon effects... right now I have PhysX off and it looks like I'm killing people with rain droplets. Looks so much better with PhysX on. When I first got that gun I didn't even know if it was working.
What cheap, gimicky bullshit Physx is. More than half of those effects could be done without a Physx enabled card. I remember they advertised the same shit on Batman Arkham Asylum. "With a Physx card you can see newspapers flying in the air when you walk over them!!!" rofl, I saw shit like that on GTA3 10 years ago. Morons.
okay..that means if I have a ATI Radeon card (for example HD 5750 in my case) there are no Physx effects and the game would look so crappy only because I dont have a Nvidia card?
@94XJ I have an 8 year old Dell with an high-end AGP ATI card with an Ageia PhysX card, I actually got it to play this game with the PhysX on, but it lags like none other!
I have a nvidia 280 card and a physx card and the physx dont work. I haven't really seen any explanation as to why not. In the menu you can turn on physics but not the advanced physics which is whats in this video. whats up
So lame, it's not like these effects can't be done without Physx, it's just a scam for Nvidia to make more money, they pay off the devs to make all of these particle effects with Physx that they could make without, that way, when the game comes out they shit on ATI users.
It's actually pretty immature when you think about it,
1Adr1an6 2 weeks ago
pyshx is scam
therealwouter 3 weeks ago
retards! the one with OFF above it has the particles off! I mean WHY would you have a game with a gun called the powerfull water gun when my piss diameter is wider? The graphics has been turned down, rename this to [game name] bad vs max quality for all i care
TC53227 1 month ago
Gimmick
MsBickle76 3 months ago
looks great^^
SpliffStaar3110 3 months ago
que jogada de marquetim fudida foi essa da nvidia ein, nem comparaçao"com e sem physx ! caba perdendo a graça joga sem physx
JPMIIIIIIIII 4 months ago
just so u all know what Nvidia shows off with "PhysX" can all be done by using CPU based Physics like Havok, which has also been proven to take less performance off.
kdawgmaster 4 months ago
1C COMPANY? THE COMPANY THAT MADE MEN OF HONOR?
theuncanspan 4 months ago
@theuncanspan 1C are a publisher.
Also, the particle effects are possible on a CPU, sure... but they're a lot easier to do with a CPU.
roxahris 3 months ago
0:57 I can do that with my penis
tommapar88 6 months ago 2
this games graphic is awfull.
comicguy00 7 months ago
@comicguy00 are you serious?
manuruleforeva123 7 months ago
@manuruleforeva123 yes, im very serious. Is it using physx to compensate for something?
comicguy00 7 months ago
@comicguy00 Your grammar is awful.
Filbertfriend 6 months ago
@Filbertfriend troll
comicguy00 6 months ago
I feel as if Intel is spamming this thread.
solobackpacking 7 months ago
physx is dead (nvidia user here)
Vitiuxa 7 months ago
Are you kidding me? You can't create good-looking rain without any physics engine? Come on.
xmine08 7 months ago
@xmine08
The game uses SPH simulation. The only other game that produces similar fluids is Crazy Machines 2. And it relies on GPU PhysX as well. SPH is very slow on CPUs. Give Realflow a whirl (no pun intended) and compare its speed to some of the stuff Nvidia does in realtime. It's night and day.
cildni 7 months ago
Dirt 3 has some impressive particle effect's, and the best part, it don't need PhysX and runs at 60FPS without a extra card. Nvidia's closed door approach has only hindered them.
captaincough 8 months ago 9
@captaincough you dont need an extra card who told you that? all you need is a series 9XXX or higher
treemaniscool 2 months ago
i don't remember the weapon at 0:55... was it in the game (main line)?
fatderda 8 months ago
Physx is one of the biggest gimmicks ever... There's only like 3 games that actually use it, and none of those games even has the best physics of any game whatsoever.
Take a look at games like Crysis (the first one), and Portal 2... Those games have great physics, and they don't even use Physx at all.
People have even RECOMMENDED that I use an extra videocard as a dedicated Physx GPU. The only game I have that uses Physx is Metro 2033, and I can't even really tell a difference.
RalphCQ 8 months ago 4
@RalphCQ plenty of games use physX , don't like it? Don't use it, it's not a gimmick its a true physics engine btw
Fyrwe 8 months ago
@Fyrwe No, its crapware. And it is a gimmick.
ShroedingerWatcher 1 month ago
@RalphCQ PhysX is not a gimmick. It does enhance gameplay greatly. The fact that there aren't many games that support PhysX and that the frame rates drop massively with PhysX enabled, isn't really the fault of the technology itself. The technology itself is very sound and impressive, we just need more games supporting PhysX and more powerful cards that won't drop frames significantly with PhysX enabled.
madascene99 7 months ago
where can i download this ?
Audi0Phil 9 months ago
where is in this fucking game the water gun?
Fistler01 9 months ago
physX is awezum:O
gabrocki 10 months ago
That's very misleading because everything on the physx side can be done without physx in most engines. I've made similar effects with bouncing particles in the UE3 without the need for any physics card. Simply disabling particles all-together in the game then saying "look, only physx can do this!" is very misleading and just plain untrue Water doesn't flow in this game, they're simply transparent particles which bounce around for 1-2 seconds then fade away.
iSOBigD 10 months ago 82
@iSOBigD a processor can do everything physx can do, just slower. A cpu doesn't have the same calculating capacity as a gpu which is why physx is used to take some of the workload off of the cpu and put it on the gpu.
marski1337 8 months ago
@marski1337 Right, but in these examples, everything shows on the physx side can be done on an average CPU at a good frame rate within a game. It's simply an unfair, biased, rigged "comparisson".
iSOBigD 8 months ago
@iSOBigD Yeah, I get you. I'm using a quad core cpu but since I have a physx gpu as well I just tend to use that if it's available in the game. This comparison is maybe a bit biased in that it should have had like a gazillion million crashing particles rendered both on cpu alone and then in physx. Then we would've seen a drop in frame rate on the cpu side.
marski1337 8 months ago
@iSOBigD Interesting... never thought about it that way.
ARRL92 8 months ago
@iSOBigD don't hate
Fyrwe 8 months ago
@iSOBigD I get where you going and I think your right but UE3 is not good example because it's also based on the physx engine (but off course you can do this effect without the phicx enige). also it isn't like you need a separate graphics card (at leat if you have a nvidia card). but i hate the monopole from nvidia on this engine as well!
bionade422 8 months ago
@iSOBigD
Generally only about a tenth of the physics effects is possible on the CPU even with over clocking.
You should have said that PhysX type effects is possible using STREAM or OpenCL, albeit, not as refined as CUDA.
But neither has Apple, AMD or the Kronos Group come up with a PhysX substitute for the GPU.
solobackpacking 7 months ago 3
@iSOBigD Exactly what I was going to say. Drives me crazy when game developers say "you need a physics card for that", when all they are doing is adding particle physics... which has been around for years.
rekindledphoenix 7 months ago
@iSOBigD
Thanks telling. I knew there was something suspicious about this.
Euugor 6 months ago
@iSOBigD I think you're a bit of an idiot. Could cryostasis do more that it did without physx? Yes, and it do what physx can without physx? No. Companies use physx because it's the all around best way to use particle physics effects, and it looks damn good, and it's easy. Using a complex work around for something that looks worse in the end, isn't worth it. So most companies just say "use physx or get no good graphics at all"
onefrozenheart 6 months ago
@onefrozenheart You really have no clue what you're talking about. Physx is about physics, it has nothing to do with graphics. You can make great special effects that don't interact with other objects and you'd need no physics engine of any kind - plus the game would run faster. Physics just allow for interaction between objects, in this case, particles. If there's no physical interaction, you don't need a physics engine. Graphics don't need physics.
iSOBigD 6 months ago
@iSOBigD you can get dumber over time! COOL! Maybe you should re-read my comment. The only graphics related thing I said was my end quote, which is true, physx, particles, no physx, no particles (or way less particle effects) therefore, no physx means worse graphics, that is true, for cryostasis, and was the companies decision to do that. I also said physx looks good, which is true, the particles interacting in the world with other things, does look good
onefrozenheart 5 months ago
@iSOBigD
Thank you. I was thinking about that too.... I knew that couldn't be true.
ZephyrnixLive 6 months ago
@iSOBigD Then you wouldn't mind doing this for each and every company that has to make a game with particle effects that interact with in game geometry? I for one like the way this looks, most people seem to like this video, and it cuts down on programing time for developers.
oflaherty117 5 months ago
@oflaherty117 It doesn't cut down on anything, it's an on/off switch just like before. They're simply accelerated by a video card so they can have more interactive particles at once. That's literally all it is. The point is the video simply has particles off then particles on. It's not a physx on/off comparison at all.
iSOBigD 5 months ago
@iSOBigD If you did not have a Nvidia GPU would you still be able to see these effects?
oflaherty117 5 months ago
@oflaherty117 In theory... However there are several games that look much better with PhysX where such effects are not available without proper hardware... NVidia is often paying them for that.
You could always try cracked/hacked version of PhysX... it works flawlessly... it is just NVidia blocking/disabling hardware support if it can find graphic card made by competition.
adderek 5 months ago
@iSOBigD Thanks for clearing that up.
oflaherty117 5 months ago
do radeon have this?
iwhitecastle 11 months ago
@iwhitecastle
AMD uses havok, but I got a Physx card with my 4870 so I got both Nvidia physx and Havok. :)
696969Brian696969 11 months ago
@696969Brian696969 Havok isn't ATI exclusive kid.
airgilbert 10 months ago 3
@iwhitecastle nope, this is an nvidia technology, although its all just marketing. i wouldnt be surprised if ati have something exactly the same just called a different name.
kahuna3901 11 months ago
@kahuna3901 no, ati hasn't got a 3d technology that works as well as nvidias 3d vision nor do they support physx or something similar. I just bought myself a 560ti - finally i can play this game with activated physx :D
MartinGro131 11 months ago
@MartinGro131 PhysX will so be phased out because more companies go with Havok now a days which does the same thing just less performance draining and works on both cards. Also the way ATI's 3D works is the same as Nvidia the only thing they dont have is the classes yet, which 3rd party companies are making that work with all monitors.
kdawgmaster 11 months ago
@kahuna3901 technically its Agiea technology which was around before Nvidia bought them making PhysX to work on both ATI and Nvidia at the time. Nvidia bought the rights to them so they can say they have something that the competition dosnt, which will be phased out by havok because most game dev's dont like to create a bias on their games. Overall the amount of times that PhysX is placed in a game now dosnt warrant buying a Nvidia card just for PhysX or ur a blind man.
kdawgmaster 11 months ago
yes but big computer nesesary
Jigsaw5999999999 11 months ago
advertisement gimmick by nvidia
ninjaturtle205 11 months ago
@ninjaturtle205 Huh? Yes, this is them showing what they can do with Physx, but it's not really a gimmick. Like reflections, soft shadows, and dynamic lightings/shadows, this can make a game look far better, making the player feel like they are playing in a more responsive world.
MordeaniisChaos 11 months ago
@MordeaniisChaos True that PhysX does add more to the game but this can also be done with Havok which is a CPU based physics generator, which is also why companies like to go with havok over PhysX
kdawgmaster 11 months ago
i loled hard at the water cannon thts so fake
Walkthroughs14 1 year ago
Lol, do you notice that the settings are higher in the physx on test?
FRURMELLL 1 year ago
Nvidia sucks major balls. They keep optimising games for their utterly expensive and innefective cards just to sabotage ATi.
NotRaPoSa0CiNzEnTa 1 year ago
@NotRaPoSa0CiNzEnTa and that is a bad thing how ?
torrasque2007 11 months ago
@torrasque2007 Instead of making better cards, Nvidia disoptimizes games for cards from other brands. This affects the price on the Nvidia cards.
NotRaPoSa0CiNzEnTa 11 months ago
The realy cool physics are when you pee. :D
Kreks2000 1 year ago
roflmao the watercannon without physx, that was patethic
daogenify 1 year ago
@daogenify
your spelling is also pathetic.
TheAngelicDemise 1 year ago
The water cannon is fucking hilarious without physx. You are telling me that is how they designed it?
HDaviator 1 year ago
lol at that effects.. they can be done without physx for sure
manyalforever 1 year ago
GAH where do you GET that GUN?
NanoTrout1 1 year ago
NOW THAT WAS HILARIOUS :DDDDD
Pratham40s 1 year ago
This looks so exaggerated. I've seen similar effects in games that don't use PhysX.
ImperialArmour 1 year ago
@ImperialArmour e.g. Bioshock on ATI cards
AlDavisHudson 1 year ago
umm.. is this bullshit? i doubt PhysX turns the water gun from a piss cannon to a water jet.
leachinfested 1 year ago
is this game scary? like bioshock?
quangluu96 1 year ago
Who the hell wants to rent this video?
webmasale 1 year ago
PhysX isn't a scam first off, go try Metro 2033, and turn advanced PhysX on, you will notice a considerable difference of in-game particles.
Doofunator 1 year ago
@Doofunator for the performance drop its dismissable
kdawgmaster 11 months ago
I also agree with what others said about PhysX being a scam. I played Mirror's Edge with and without PhysX and while there were very minor graphics improvements, they made framerate unnecessarily slower. The improvements also had no effect on gameplay at all, so whats the point?
StopFear 1 year ago
This game does have locations where you can see good physics like this, ok, but overall the game is very poorly tested and runs very poorly. Maybe some later indoors levels are good, but I played thorugh first two areas (outside, indoors, first enemies appear) and it was buggy as hell.
StopFear 1 year ago 2
that sucked so hard
dsalimander 1 year ago
physx is indeed a scam.... this comparison is fake
therealwouter 1 year ago
physx is a scam
biakuya 1 year ago
@ApocalypseIsComing and i see your not a software developer!
lappodude 1 year ago
Great...now I need to go take a piss
uberfool 1 year ago
Wow, they creeated an peeing machine.!
horniradu 1 year ago 56
wooow.....no PhyX nd its the crapiest game i've seen in the past 3 years....With phyX nd it suddnly becomes awesome 0.o......
bdfbsfbs 1 year ago
They should be able to do all of this without physx.
Usul573 1 year ago
@Usul573 Yes it is possible. At a price.... The software can simulate this effect at the cost of half your frame-rate.
Nintendoguy5794 1 year ago
lol 0:55 (the left one) the water look like pee
TuanNafiz 1 year ago
PhysX is good, but unless you spend a shitload of money on a computer, it will always make games unplayable.
TheJQKteam 1 year ago
wow @ the water
sniperboy102 1 year ago
Ati chips können die effekte doch auch berechnen, nur die haben eben keinen extra chip oO
TheButtialex 1 year ago
What is physx?? when did it come out??
ISetYourFaceOnFire 1 year ago
@ISetYourFaceOnFire PhysX is an nVidia only feature that makes physics in games look more beautiful. Only a few games like Batman Arkham Asylum and Cryostasis use it, but it's a cool feature when you have an nVidia grahpics card and one of those games.
Vr0l1jk 1 year ago
@Vr0l1jk Aww okay thanks so are all games going to have it in the future or? wait is it only for pc the "Physx"? and when did it come out :o?
ISetYourFaceOnFire 1 year ago
@ISetYourFaceOnFire no not all games are going to have it just games pretty much that are made for Nvidia users and btw MAFIA 2 with PhysX on high Owns all!
lVleSHuGGA 1 year ago
@ISetYourFaceOnFire Physx is one of the many reasons why Nvidia owns ATI.
TheBraden1996 1 year ago
@TheBraden1996 Right...Name 2 other reasons. Just a small grasp out of the many reasons why ATI owns nVidia, faster, cheaper (except the well positioned GTX 460), cooler and therefore quiter, way less power consumption, ATI brings out new cards more than once in a decade. Actually, next generation comes out in just 2 weeks. This will undoubtly slaughter the GTX460/465, as it is said the HD6870 will replace the HD5770 on it's pricepoint, but will offer HD5870 performance.
Vr0l1jk 1 year ago
-.- This game was made for PhysX. So without it looks like shit
1stKarkan 1 year ago
its funny cause that stuff shows up when its off so wtf?
hitman74 1 year ago
at 0:58, the water on the left looks like a pathetic toy
VietboiKhai 1 year ago
Fuck you Nvidia, you cockaroaches.
micprn 1 year ago
Comment removed
URIZHEY 1 year ago
the last thing is just a joke... u dont fucking need phsyx to make water u stupid idiot. Tryin to impress that phsyx is so much better...
isjet 1 year ago
Well, the whole gunfire spark thing was new and kind of neat but other than that the only thing I've seen come out of PhysX is lag.....
no1doesitlikeme 1 year ago
oh so u cant have physx unless you have a nvidia card well guess its a good thing a had a gtx 285 put im my pc instead of that ati he was going to put in it :S
suckmylol 1 year ago
This game looks a lot like bioshock
tom1161 1 year ago
@tom1161
you've obviously never played it, then...
ronpack 1 year ago
2014 we will laugh our asses off, when we rewatch that stupid PhysX shit. Just a retarded attempt to make more cash.
12x8u 1 year ago
@12x8u I ditto this, as a Nvidia owner I can say myself that Physx is a highly unoptimized gimmick that could be simulated quite easily and lag free with a simple cpu.
Trampboy931 1 year ago
Next time I jump in a swimming pool with lag-free splashes, Ima be like, YAY, REAL WORLD PHYSICS FTW ^^
no1doesitlikeme 1 year ago
Physics of the Future is Right here Ladies and Gents...Unless there is a Superior Physics Engine.
wariofan279 1 year ago
@wariofan279 with DX11 and more recent updates with Havok and Cry 3 engine, physx is pretty much useless. not to mention Physx is about 10x more to implement than Havok and other engines, hence why only a VERY few games use it.
KingOfSand100 1 year ago
@KingOfSand100
You over-Exagerate,Many games use PhysX.
maybe not as much as Havok,But Still,Alot of Games use it.
And i have never Seen Havok do Water Movement.
wariofan279 1 year ago
@wariofan279 there really isn't that many. according to the nvidia site, only 30 games use physx.
KingOfSand100 1 year ago
It looks worse than it would because they used virtually no other standard of hardware physics when Nv Physx is disabled.
They didn't even use Havoc! They would have you think it's this bad without Nv's Physx, which is entirely untrue.
ATI has hardware physics support, but it is opensource, they working on an open standard, so game developers don't have to pay $ to use it. Lets just hope developers get on board.
More people will have access to hardware physics, and dev's won't have to pay.
HypnoticSuggestion 1 year ago
Are ''Cryostasis'' and ''Cryostasis Sleep of Reason'' same games???
borkogamerr 1 year ago
@borkogamerr yes
EvilLamas 1 year ago
i am up to level 8 but havent seen anything like that and i have installed physX and have turned it on in the options but still nothing is it because i have an ATI mobility radeon graphics card? do i need an NVIDIA card?
360viper117 1 year ago
@360viper117 yes
codejunki567 1 year ago
NVIDIA crank that S#!T UP! FUCK ATI FUCK ASUS DOING 1200$ CARD FOR ATI! FUCK AMD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
aldobu1990 1 year ago
@aldobu1990 butthurt fan
SpadeAce90 1 year ago
@aldobu1990 neeeeeeeeeerd raaaaaaaaaaaaaaage!!!!
zarcnest 1 year ago
@aldobu1990 1200$ card? lol
manyakols9 1 year ago
The water blaster ... OMG made me so lol
VegasVolt3ya9a 1 year ago 42
very gooooooooooooooood!!! :D
but
the game sucks D:
Xxx0zkrxxX 1 year ago
@Xxx0zkrxxX The game is great 0_o
SgtMustang 1 year ago
@SgtMustang if you say it :P
Xxx0zkrxxX 1 year ago
this is not physx on and off its graphics high and graphics low
jordyboy321 1 year ago
forcing the physx may make it look worse on ati but it is still a good game
Sharkey3331 1 year ago
complete difference
ylimani 1 year ago
"Water pour and flows as it would in the physical world" Lmao fail. :D
We may never see that. :P
REVLEX321 1 year ago
Jiggle PhysX? They should trademark that.
l33tpete 1 year ago
complete bullshit
kamikazerus 1 year ago
i have ati card (so no physx) but ima still get
Sharkey3331 1 year ago
@Sharkey3331 You can get an Ageia card but it will lag with this game though!
elliottad 1 year ago
sure, the physx is prettier, but the fact remains that the other guy killed his baddie first :P
Kingpreist 1 year ago
This game is so awesome, I just bought it again on Steam... Love it.
holidayspecialoo 1 year ago
Oh, I just bought this. Comparing the water cannon effects... right now I have PhysX off and it looks like I'm killing people with rain droplets. Looks so much better with PhysX on. When I first got that gun I didn't even know if it was working.
TheVinster 1 year ago
I have
scarvasa 1 year ago
oh, so that's why my dad told me that i should get a new computer with a nVidia card and not an ATi. can't wait to get a new computer though ;)
grineti5 1 year ago
While watching, I was mostly paying attention to the screen with enabled PhysX.)
Vaernim 1 year ago
wow!
SerzantasLTU 1 year ago
the physics engine must be integrated in directx, so it doesen't matter what hardware you have.
mathmatze 1 year ago
physx is BS , what is really needed is game programers to get of their fat asses and do better coding to do real use of quad cores and hexacores
Take real advantage of these monster new cpus for physics ... thats what i say !
YaBaDji 1 year ago 2
What cheap, gimicky bullshit Physx is. More than half of those effects could be done without a Physx enabled card. I remember they advertised the same shit on Batman Arkham Asylum. "With a Physx card you can see newspapers flying in the air when you walk over them!!!" rofl, I saw shit like that on GTA3 10 years ago. Morons.
John845 1 year ago
its me or with PhysX off, the game runs smoother?
SantuXD6 1 year ago
Seems you need an nvidia card to play this game. Too bad...
Joymani 1 year ago
okay..that means if I have a ATI Radeon card (for example HD 5750 in my case) there are no Physx effects and the game would look so crappy only because I dont have a Nvidia card?
iHardstyleZz 1 year ago
Can I use my ATI card for my main GPU and buy a GTS 250 as a dedicated PhysX?
itchyfingers89 1 year ago
@itchyfingers89 : no you cannot, as nvidia won't allow physx to run if a non-nvidia gpu is doing the rendering.
h3Xh3Xh3X 1 year ago
@h3Xh3Xh3X With the latest drivers you can have an ati gpu for the graphics you'll need an nvidia card to run the physx obviously.
Also PhysX requires a gpu with a MINIMUM of 32 stream processors so 8600gt/9500gt are bare minimum.
94XJ 1 year ago
@94XJ I have an 8 year old Dell with an high-end AGP ATI card with an Ageia PhysX card, I actually got it to play this game with the PhysX on, but it lags like none other!
elliottad 1 year ago
@h3Xh3Xh3X lol google hybrid physx. you'll be surprised.
iGhost 1 year ago
wow u don't need physx to do all that, if they strip the game down on purpose is different lol, propaganda ftl
krelianz 1 year ago
(PhysX) Makes Tits move naturally .Therefor it's worth the investment.
aceracc323 1 year ago 245
@aceracc323 There is a Chinese MMO game with that feature in a middle of development process.
GordonFreeMANness 1 year ago
@GordonFreeMANness Yes!
aceracc323 1 year ago
@aceracc323 LOL like in the first 3dmark Vantage test right? No physx...no jiggly, physx jiggly.
94XJ 1 year ago
@94XJ Yes, I thought I was The Only One Benchmarking to see Tits Move.
aceracc323 1 year ago
@aceracc323 Very right dude :D
Ese186 1 year ago
@aceracc323 and it lowers your fps nice
MG5319 1 year ago
@aceracc323
best comment here in the last weeks,man...you're our hero.
Therealguy78666 1 year ago
@aceracc323 ICant people just post a regular comment instead of making it sex oriented?
novaleafy 1 year ago
@aceracc323 You just red my mind...
Nunski17 1 year ago
@aceracc323 New upcoming porn games using PhysX and Kinect plus 3D, it would be awesome!! :D
MrHamzaAsghar 1 year ago
The Video is way, way too short to make a statement.
Arthounot 1 year ago
Looks less like "hey we can do cool things with PhysX!" and more like "hey, if you don't buy our PhysX card, we will disable these effects for you!"
A failed advertisement.
Kinokarte 1 year ago 3
cryostasis sucks...it is just a bioshock ripoff.
cenagod 1 year ago
@cenagod you are a moron
NosferatuAaacaado 1 year ago
I have a nvidia 280 card and a physx card and the physx dont work. I haven't really seen any explanation as to why not. In the menu you can turn on physics but not the advanced physics which is whats in this video. whats up
fallers 1 year ago
aik ?
kenapa yang off grafik nya macam di kurangkan ?
walau apa pun,
saya rasa HD5970 sudah memadai untuk saya.
brengsed 1 year ago
The point is that today only a few games support PhysX....
And the most of them are crappy games...
johnie1992 1 year ago 18
@johnie1992 Mafia 2 is not a crappy game :)
vladut15bis 1 year ago
@vladut15bis Right, Mafia 2 is the Only good game with physx.... But Mafia's 2 game engine graphics where not that good...
Plus the End of the game was a Crap!!
johnie1992 1 year ago
@johnie1992
yeah the ending sucked but the rest of the game made up for it
oiboydirect 1 year ago
@johnie1992 Mafia 2=Crap game
SgtMustang 1 year ago
@johnie1992 mirrors edge isn't a crappy game too :o
re4pt0x 1 year ago
@re4pt0x Indead, thats why I said "The Most of them" and not "All of them"