This is NOT a Gnossienne! This piece is called ,,3 Morceaux en forme de poire'' composed in 1903. In translation it would be something like - Three pear-shaped pieces. A really interesting anecdote is related to this, mainly because of Debussy not liking this composition and calling Satie a untalented boy.
I believe there has somehow come to a mistake. The Gnossiennes are only six, composed in the years 1889–97.
Debussy has never thought that Satie was "untalented". Actually he advises Satie to give a form, or more form, to his works. Then Satie called his new work "Trois Morceaux En Forme De Poire".
@rasboras Well, I'm sorry if I have in some kind typed an misleading information, but that's what I have read about this piece in my study books. ;) Any how, I find it very funny and I still remember how curious I was when I looked this piece up at youtube.
@zflauta92 Of course though, the numerations outside of the first three are largely irrelevant, since they only relate to their discovery. The composition dates of all seven (yes, including the original three) are all over the place though.
@zflauta92 From "Sept Gnossiennes", published by Salabert: "In the manuscript of Trois Morceaux en forme de poire, written in September 1903 for piano four hands, Satie added this note in the margin of the first piece, "Maniere de Commencement": "Gnossienne from 'Le Fils des Etoiles'. Was composed in 1891"."
Just like how the 4th, 5th and 6th were intended as stand-alone pieces separate from the original three, this 7th was intended as a part of the Trois Morceaux.
It's an interesting interpretation - indeed... I'd be lying, calling you talent deprived... But for me your version isn't homogeneous enough. I got the "normal" 6 parts of the Gnossiènnes and I'm lacking the last one. I'm lying on my couch - dreaming, relaxing - listening to 6 parts and then suddenly your 7th part starts with that much allegro - that I couldn't have been so far from a cardiac arrest... Well - I survived so far - but would it be possible to smoothen your interpretation?
@schokolade975 Even in composition, the seventh Gnossienne is ridicuously different from the other six... Though it has some similarity to Gnossienne 1.
As such, my advice is to play this like you would play Gnossienne 1.
This is NOT a Gnossienne! This piece is called ,,3 Morceaux en forme de poire'' composed in 1903. In translation it would be something like - Three pear-shaped pieces. A really interesting anecdote is related to this, mainly because of Debussy not liking this composition and calling Satie a untalented boy.
I believe there has somehow come to a mistake. The Gnossiennes are only six, composed in the years 1889–97.
zflauta92 2 months ago
@zflauta92
Debussy has never thought that Satie was "untalented". Actually he advises Satie to give a form, or more form, to his works. Then Satie called his new work "Trois Morceaux En Forme De Poire".
rasboras 1 month ago
@rasboras Well, I'm sorry if I have in some kind typed an misleading information, but that's what I have read about this piece in my study books. ;) Any how, I find it very funny and I still remember how curious I was when I looked this piece up at youtube.
zflauta92 1 month ago
@zflauta92 Of course though, the numerations outside of the first three are largely irrelevant, since they only relate to their discovery. The composition dates of all seven (yes, including the original three) are all over the place though.
TheWanderingNight 1 month ago
@zflauta92 From "Sept Gnossiennes", published by Salabert: "In the manuscript of Trois Morceaux en forme de poire, written in September 1903 for piano four hands, Satie added this note in the margin of the first piece, "Maniere de Commencement": "Gnossienne from 'Le Fils des Etoiles'. Was composed in 1891"."
Just like how the 4th, 5th and 6th were intended as stand-alone pieces separate from the original three, this 7th was intended as a part of the Trois Morceaux.
TheWanderingNight 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
where can i find the partition please?? it's really beautiful
andreu7777 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ongelooflijk wat een rust.
Geniet van ieder noot
MartinDickMidi 3 months ago
Ongelooflijk wat een rust.
Geiet van ieder noot
MartinDickMidi 3 months ago
@MartinDickMidi sukkel
ozzybaanders 2 months ago
where can i find the partition please?? it's really beautiful
leoservet 3 months ago
Lets hope they find an eighth
realjess29 4 months ago
woooow. didn't know this excisted until now
Sensenwerk 6 months ago
What a delightful piece. Has a very sinister sound that makes it more menacing than anything else I've ever heard from Satie.
mahler151 6 months ago
very nice. how many gonissienes did he make total?
jrfuent 7 months ago
@jrfuent 6
lukawski100 6 months ago
Comment removed
FutureMusic12am 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
7, :), not 6
source: from Wikipedia and Piano Society
FutureMusic12am 6 months ago
Comment removed
phantasmalmirth 9 months ago
this is my first time hearing this gnossienne. It's amazing.
phantasmalmirth 9 months ago
i thought there were only 6?
TheNumber1John 9 months ago
@TheNumber1John They recently discovered a seventh
SuperMegaPeanut 6 months ago
there is no no. 7 this is from "Morceaux en forme de Poire"
ironpianist 10 months ago
@ironpianist Satie later adapted Gnossienne VII for piano-four-hands as the introduction to the "Three Pieces for Piano in the Shape of a Pear".
JupiterIV 9 months ago
It's an interesting interpretation - indeed... I'd be lying, calling you talent deprived... But for me your version isn't homogeneous enough. I got the "normal" 6 parts of the Gnossiènnes and I'm lacking the last one. I'm lying on my couch - dreaming, relaxing - listening to 6 parts and then suddenly your 7th part starts with that much allegro - that I couldn't have been so far from a cardiac arrest... Well - I survived so far - but would it be possible to smoothen your interpretation?
schokolade975 1 year ago 2
@schokolade975 Even in composition, the seventh Gnossienne is ridicuously different from the other six... Though it has some similarity to Gnossienne 1.
As such, my advice is to play this like you would play Gnossienne 1.
MotEmantsalon 11 months ago
... real good interpretation of that very subtle piece *****
fancynot 1 year ago