I hear Muslims, Christians and Jews say you need witnesses to prove things, for instance if you want to prove something in court you need one or two witnesses or some even say four, if you have no witnesses then u have no case,curious if anyone else was in the cave with Muhammad when he met the angel. and if not how can Muhammad prove he is a prophet? He did not do what other prophets did and that is prophecy, and im not just talking about one prophecy, to much religion and not enough seeking.
Christianity, seems like Ali should stick to the topic and stop pointing towards teh other books and stick to his own book to argue about Muhammad's prophet hood, im not religious.
but if u would like to have a debate there are thousands of debaters who are willing to .I have wached a dvd for u where u ask about the religion of islam and stuff but it wasnt realy reliable since there wasnt any one from the muslim side to respond to what you were saying about islam.moreover the questions that you were answering after your lecture seemed to have been written by you.
Regarding your reference to the prophet that was to be sent like Moses is Jesus not Mohammed( peace be upon them both). So am I right in saying that you believe that Jesus is a prophet then? because as far as I know, that's not what most Christian if any at all think Jesus was! and I'm pretty sure most believe he was either God or the son of God or one of the holy trinity,(funny because that's not what the Jews thought the Messiah was) therefore the word prophet would not apply to Jesus.
Hi, all Christians affirm Christ's mission is threefold: Priest, Prophet, and King. Look it up. In Christianity, prophet is not a rank like in Islam, a prophet is anybody who reveals the future. So the God of the Old Testament is a prophet, because He reveals the future. So too, Jesus is both God and man and Prophet, because He reveals the future.
As for contradictions, I believe any book can be interpreted in a hundred ways, so many of those interpretations are not contradictory with science.
@Glorthac Where in scripture is God ever referred to as a prophet? "Jesus is both God and man and Prophet" if this is true then why does it say in Numbers 23,19 "God [is] not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do [it]? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good?"
As for contradictions in the NT,Dr Bart Ehrman a Grade A new test scholar has a said there are contradictions in the NT & gives evidence, check out his vid's.
These passages you cited are not erroneous, but supernatural. God, through the holy water, reveals adultery. There are no contradictions in the Bible, because it is impossible for a contradiction to exist in any book, have you not read any epistemology books? If you want to talk about something more important, like the Holy Trinity, then write me a private message. Otherwise, don't waste my time with your tiny issues.
@Glorthac "There are no contradictions in the Bible,because it is impossible for a contradiction to exist in any book" thats nonsense. If a statement in one verse contradicts something in modern day science then that would qualify as a contradiction, as it contradicts proven science so how can there be no book that contradicts.The bible says the world was made in 6 days, that's a contradiction. Watch a debate between Dr Campbell & Dr Naik called the Bible & the Quran in the light of science.
It doesn't matter if you disagree with us, interpretation is subjective, not objective, so it's logically fallacious for you to say the Christian interpretation is wrong.
It does not say "And these signs shall follow ALL them that believe;". Some Christians have done miracles, for example, St. Augustine of Hippo cured a sick man.
typically, his adventure as a chosen one began, filled with doubt, angst, tears, mysticism, action, harem, character developments/ derailment and an ending.
people need to look at him as a historical figure, man! less bias that way.
If we're going to look at Muhammad historically, why not start with what you brought up, Bahira the monk. Since we know Bahira was an Ebionite, and the Ebionites used the Tanakh and a slightly altered Gospel of Matthew, can you show me where his books spoke of a cupping glass marking indicating a prophet?
If not, whose to say that the early Muslims weren't making up prophesies as they went along?
yeah even Zakir Naik made this mistake about Deutoronomy. LOL. They like to pick and choose verses here and there to proof Muhammad as they like and choose while ignoring the CONTEXT of the whole story. When the context refutes Muhammad they say Oh the Bible is Corrupt so we don't take it seriously. Sigh....
If he's going to allude Daniel 7 to his false prophet (Muhammad) then he's also going to have to say that Muhammad came from the line of David. ROFL! The ignorance of these Muslims are staggering.
"And they shall dwell in the land that I have given unto Jacob my servant, wherein your fathers have dwelt; and they shall dwell therein, even they, and their children, and their children's children for ever: and MY SERVANT DAVID shall be their prince for ever." (Ezekiel 37:25)
YAHUWAH tells David that his descendant will be given a throne to rule over the kingdom forever. What a ignorant clown! Ali Ataie is replacing Messianic prophecies with his failed and erroneous Muhammadimic prophecies. He articulates the Hebrew lexicon seemingly well enough to try and sound impressive in front of everybody. Well I can read him at least two verses from the Hebrew Bible to prove him flat out wrong.
"And when thy days be fulfilled, and thou shalt sleep with thy fathers, I will set up thy seed after thee, which shall proceed out of thy bowels, and I will establish his kingdom. He shall build an house for my name, and I will stablish the throne of his kingdom for ever." (2 Samuel 7:12-13)
this is ajoke he qouts ibn ishaq although muslim do not accept this guy to be100% correct! it like following all these book followed by christian that are not included in the bible
I'm not arguing that I. Ishaq is canonical, but in this case he is historically correct.
I'm just wondering, if you reject I. Ishaq, what was the prophecy Bahira saw in Muhammad? After all, it doesn't matter if Bahira quoted an un-biblical prophesy.
But then again what you have to realize is that today the original Bible does not cease to exist. Could it have been that there were other passages in the ORGINAL TEXT which gave of such signs!? I mean, today's Bible is compiled with translations of translations. If you know anything about literature, you would know that when texts are translated their meanings sometime COMPLETELY CHANGE.
If Muhammad is the "spirit of Truth" but yet Jesus says he will send the Spirit of Truth but only God sends prophets wouldn't that make Jesus God? Sigh....but again I love your video bro. Keep them coming...
Is Mohammad the greatest prophet becouse Allat, Uzza, Manah the 3 pagan goddesses , Mohammad told us to pray to. No wonder muslims pray 5 times a day
once for Allat, once for Uzza, once for Manah, once for that other guy.
residentmich1 7 months ago
I hear Muslims, Christians and Jews say you need witnesses to prove things, for instance if you want to prove something in court you need one or two witnesses or some even say four, if you have no witnesses then u have no case,curious if anyone else was in the cave with Muhammad when he met the angel. and if not how can Muhammad prove he is a prophet? He did not do what other prophets did and that is prophecy, and im not just talking about one prophecy, to much religion and not enough seeking.
megapraise11 8 months ago
The Debate is about Muhammad but Ali keeps at
Christianity, seems like Ali should stick to the topic and stop pointing towards teh other books and stick to his own book to argue about Muhammad's prophet hood, im not religious.
megapraise11 8 months ago
MR wood,this is not a debate
but if u would like to have a debate there are thousands of debaters who are willing to .I have wached a dvd for u where u ask about the religion of islam and stuff but it wasnt realy reliable since there wasnt any one from the muslim side to respond to what you were saying about islam.moreover the questions that you were answering after your lecture seemed to have been written by you.
RAMRAM53230 11 months ago
@RAMRAM53230
I am not David Wood, I think his YouTube channel is Acts17Apologetics.
Glorthac 11 months ago
Regarding your reference to the prophet that was to be sent like Moses is Jesus not Mohammed( peace be upon them both). So am I right in saying that you believe that Jesus is a prophet then? because as far as I know, that's not what most Christian if any at all think Jesus was! and I'm pretty sure most believe he was either God or the son of God or one of the holy trinity,(funny because that's not what the Jews thought the Messiah was) therefore the word prophet would not apply to Jesus.
muslim610 1 year ago
Hi, all Christians affirm Christ's mission is threefold: Priest, Prophet, and King. Look it up. In Christianity, prophet is not a rank like in Islam, a prophet is anybody who reveals the future. So the God of the Old Testament is a prophet, because He reveals the future. So too, Jesus is both God and man and Prophet, because He reveals the future.
As for contradictions, I believe any book can be interpreted in a hundred ways, so many of those interpretations are not contradictory with science.
Glorthac 1 year ago
@Glorthac Where in scripture is God ever referred to as a prophet? "Jesus is both God and man and Prophet" if this is true then why does it say in Numbers 23,19 "God [is] not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do [it]? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good?"
As for contradictions in the NT,Dr Bart Ehrman a Grade A new test scholar has a said there are contradictions in the NT & gives evidence, check out his vid's.
muslim610 1 year ago
@Glorthac Contradictions in the New test watch youtube.com/watch?v=TS37yrBwx2Q
By Dr Bart Ehrman grade A New test scholar. turned agnostic after years of Biblical studies.
muslim610 1 year ago
@muslim610 If the link above doesn't work, copy & past this video title.
Dr. Bart Ehrman Sums it all up BIBLE NOT RELIABLE [MUST SEE]
muslim610 1 year ago
These passages you cited are not erroneous, but supernatural. God, through the holy water, reveals adultery. There are no contradictions in the Bible, because it is impossible for a contradiction to exist in any book, have you not read any epistemology books? If you want to talk about something more important, like the Holy Trinity, then write me a private message. Otherwise, don't waste my time with your tiny issues.
Glorthac 1 year ago
@Glorthac "There are no contradictions in the Bible,because it is impossible for a contradiction to exist in any book" thats nonsense. If a statement in one verse contradicts something in modern day science then that would qualify as a contradiction, as it contradicts proven science so how can there be no book that contradicts.The bible says the world was made in 6 days, that's a contradiction. Watch a debate between Dr Campbell & Dr Naik called the Bible & the Quran in the light of science.
muslim610 1 year ago
It doesn't matter if you disagree with us, interpretation is subjective, not objective, so it's logically fallacious for you to say the Christian interpretation is wrong.
As for Mark 16:17-18, the Scripture says:
"And these signs shall follow them that believe;"
It does not say "And these signs shall follow ALL them that believe;". Some Christians have done miracles, for example, St. Augustine of Hippo cured a sick man.
Glorthac 1 year ago
Much of the Old Testament is symbolic. "Pillars" symbolically prophecies the Apostles, and "the Earth" symbolizes the Gentiles.
So, 1 Samuel 2:8 says the Apostles of the Gentiles are the LORD's, and the Gentiles enter into the Kingdom of Heaven through the Apostles.
Job 9:6 says the Gentiles will be shaken from unbelief to belief, and this will cause the Apostles to tremble with joy.
Psalm 75:3 says the Gentiles and Jews will become 1 dissolved people in Christ Jesus, because of the Apostles.
Glorthac 1 year ago
forget about whether he was prophet or not.
it's a good story.
like the part when mo was young
and he was like the luggage boy
and there this priest holy man that says
boy you are the chosen one!
you even got the tattoo!
typically, his adventure as a chosen one began, filled with doubt, angst, tears, mysticism, action, harem, character developments/ derailment and an ending.
people need to look at him as a historical figure, man! less bias that way.
tomimn2233 1 year ago
If we're going to look at Muhammad historically, why not start with what you brought up, Bahira the monk. Since we know Bahira was an Ebionite, and the Ebionites used the Tanakh and a slightly altered Gospel of Matthew, can you show me where his books spoke of a cupping glass marking indicating a prophet?
If not, whose to say that the early Muslims weren't making up prophesies as they went along?
Glorthac 1 year ago
@Glorthac
no one.
muslims, other religious people, speculative scientists, and shady government bodies could have been making stuff up.
that's what i meant to say, it didn't matter who muhammad was, i cant prove anything because there is nothing credible and solid.
i just want to say that
his life (fantasy or real) would make a good story, that's all.
tomimn2233 1 year ago
If that's the case, this 'good story' sure has caused a lot of meaningless deaths.
Glorthac 1 year ago
@Glorthac
so it does...but i still don't see your point.
heeey wait a sec..are you referring to his biography? his biography actually kills people?
very subjective.
when a man chose to believe mo's bullshit, it is his choice, his consequences, his is the blame.
mohammad is DEAD. he doesn't gain or lose if someone dies reading his biography.
and i'm sad. why? because you thought i was defending mo's claim of prophethood,
omg.
can't a guy express interest to a figure?
tomimn2233 1 year ago
yeah even Zakir Naik made this mistake about Deutoronomy. LOL. They like to pick and choose verses here and there to proof Muhammad as they like and choose while ignoring the CONTEXT of the whole story. When the context refutes Muhammad they say Oh the Bible is Corrupt so we don't take it seriously. Sigh....
hawklanzs 1 year ago
If he's going to allude Daniel 7 to his false prophet (Muhammad) then he's also going to have to say that Muhammad came from the line of David. ROFL! The ignorance of these Muslims are staggering.
"And they shall dwell in the land that I have given unto Jacob my servant, wherein your fathers have dwelt; and they shall dwell therein, even they, and their children, and their children's children for ever: and MY SERVANT DAVID shall be their prince for ever." (Ezekiel 37:25)
HeresyCrusher 1 year ago
YAHUWAH tells David that his descendant will be given a throne to rule over the kingdom forever. What a ignorant clown! Ali Ataie is replacing Messianic prophecies with his failed and erroneous Muhammadimic prophecies. He articulates the Hebrew lexicon seemingly well enough to try and sound impressive in front of everybody. Well I can read him at least two verses from the Hebrew Bible to prove him flat out wrong.
HeresyCrusher 1 year ago
"And when thy days be fulfilled, and thou shalt sleep with thy fathers, I will set up thy seed after thee, which shall proceed out of thy bowels, and I will establish his kingdom. He shall build an house for my name, and I will stablish the throne of his kingdom for ever." (2 Samuel 7:12-13)
HeresyCrusher 1 year ago
He told you that abu ishaq is historical correct .
From his name is son of Isacc.
? jewish
taking form jewish story who hate muslim
ayamen1 2 years ago
this is ajoke he qouts ibn ishaq although muslim do not accept this guy to be100% correct! it like following all these book followed by christian that are not included in the bible
hopehope321 2 years ago
I'm not arguing that I. Ishaq is canonical, but in this case he is historically correct.
I'm just wondering, if you reject I. Ishaq, what was the prophecy Bahira saw in Muhammad? After all, it doesn't matter if Bahira quoted an un-biblical prophesy.
Glorthac 2 years ago
But then again what you have to realize is that today the original Bible does not cease to exist. Could it have been that there were other passages in the ORGINAL TEXT which gave of such signs!? I mean, today's Bible is compiled with translations of translations. If you know anything about literature, you would know that when texts are translated their meanings sometime COMPLETELY CHANGE.
niccareppindah201 2 years ago
This is complete garbage. You give Ataie 5 seconds to talk then you jabber for your full 3 minutes. What a biased piece of junk.
Post the whole debate.
bagelsandstuff 2 years ago
I posted all of Ataie's statements. Unfortunately I have to divide the video into 6 smaller videos, because I can't go over 11 minutes per video.
Glorthac 2 years ago
If Muhammad is the "spirit of Truth" but yet Jesus says he will send the Spirit of Truth but only God sends prophets wouldn't that make Jesus God? Sigh....but again I love your video bro. Keep them coming...
altorstenlinton 2 years ago
..interesting...thank you...
dimtry19 2 years ago
The only way a Muslim can apply Daniel 7 to Muhammad, is by committing shirk.
Looking forward to the rest of the series.
YHWHisElohim 2 years ago