Since GM took full control of Saab in 2000, there has been exactly ONE all-new Saab model... the 9-3. The 9-5, while a fine car, has been in continuous production for 12 years. Then we have the GM rebadges called the 9-7 and the 9-2, both of which were only sold in the United States, both of which served to humiliate and further deteriorate Saab's upscale image, and in the case of the 9-2, proved yet another fantastic failure on GM's part.
Since GM took full control of Saab in 2000, there has been exactly ONE all-new Saab model... the 9-3. The 9-5, while a fine car, has been in continuous production for 12 years. Then we have the GM rebadges called the 9-7 and the 9-2, both of which were only sold in the United States, both of which served to humiliate and further deteriorate Saab's upscale image, and in the case of the 9-2, proved yet another fantastic failure on GM's part.
Yet more media fixating on Saab losing money "for" GM rather than GM's horrendous mismanagement of Saab. In the past 10 years GM has done everything it could to ensure Saab's failure, while trying desperately (and quite unsuccessfully) to prop up its Cadillac brand in Saab's home territory.
If it only costs $100,000, that really is not that much for a super car. They start well above the $1.2 million mark. BTW
KleinA17 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Since GM took full control of Saab in 2000, there has been exactly ONE all-new Saab model... the 9-3. The 9-5, while a fine car, has been in continuous production for 12 years. Then we have the GM rebadges called the 9-7 and the 9-2, both of which were only sold in the United States, both of which served to humiliate and further deteriorate Saab's upscale image, and in the case of the 9-2, proved yet another fantastic failure on GM's part.
GM is the villain. Saab is the victim.
dpaanlka 2 years ago
Since GM took full control of Saab in 2000, there has been exactly ONE all-new Saab model... the 9-3. The 9-5, while a fine car, has been in continuous production for 12 years. Then we have the GM rebadges called the 9-7 and the 9-2, both of which were only sold in the United States, both of which served to humiliate and further deteriorate Saab's upscale image, and in the case of the 9-2, proved yet another fantastic failure on GM's part.
GM is the villain. Saab is the victim.
dpaanlka 2 years ago
Yet more media fixating on Saab losing money "for" GM rather than GM's horrendous mismanagement of Saab. In the past 10 years GM has done everything it could to ensure Saab's failure, while trying desperately (and quite unsuccessfully) to prop up its Cadillac brand in Saab's home territory.
dpaanlka 2 years ago
Comment removed
dpaanlka 2 years ago