Next week i'm getting the base 21.5 inch imac as replacement for my 2006 core2duo 2 ghz, i am pretty confident it will blow it away completely. kind of like when i went from an iphone 3g to a galaxy s2 but tht aside nice vid man! awesome screen indeed i can't wait ;DDDD
Just thought I'd let you know that the difference between the GPU's has nothing to do with your results. Geekbench only tests the RAM and the CPU, if you want to see the true difference between the two iMacs run something like 3DMark or PhotoShop rendereing tasks.
@theotherbull ahhh alright, does anybody know how well the entry level imac games? i have the 2009 macbook pro actually, 2,26 c2d with a 9400m 256 mb card, i can play cod at around 3/4 graphics and dead space 1 and 2 at almost full so im assuming this machine is gonna run these games a lot better despite the resolution increase right? (1280 by 800) on the macbook pro (1920 by 1080) on the imac
@AwesomeTeeVee than get the imac 27 with a quad-core i7processor for fast multi-tasking and video editing,better graphics (2560-by-1440 resolution), THE BIGGER SCREEN FOR BETTER QUALITY, 2X THE STORAGE SPACE FOR VIDEOS AND DOCUMENTS...THATS MY RECOMANDATION unless you're going to move around with THE COMPUTER ;)
dude i got awesome grades , so my parents agreed to get it for me , but i cant ask for the expensive one haha :/ they will say no and tell me im a spoiled kid .....
@AwesomeTeeVee if you have someone who goes to school or like uni, then get them to enter in their details in the online store and youll get LOTS of discounts even on the upgrades (like RAM n stuff) i got my 27 inch like that...
I have the 27 inch imac it is HUGEEEEEEEEE :| you know how you never know what size something will be until you have it in your hands well lets just say my mouth stayed wide open the enitre time i unboxed the 27incher :|
Hi Dave. Just to let you know, the benchmark you're using does not measure GPU performance. It measures only CPU and memory performance. A much better overall benchmark is Xbench which takes every major component of the system into consideration. The machine you're measuring can then be compared to a database of similar and previous machines dating back years. And it's entirely free. Hope this helps.
Dave, good review !! the clock speed at 3.06 ghz is pretty high on the 21 inch, considering it's only the basic entry level iMac.That makes it compete well against competitiors in the same price range.Sure, you can get a pc much cheaper with the i3, but I'm sure the clock speed would be alot lower.It also explains why the benchmark is alot higher than the 24 inch iMac with the core 2 duo. Also, I love the black borders pushed to the edge on the 21 inch.It gives it a much more polished look.
@braddudeguy The best keyboards are the ones with slightly tapered keys. In addition, the keyboard should slightly curve inward around the middle horizontally.
@mkextremerTV SL for sure - as with any new mac from August last year. You will always get the newest version at the time of purchase if it is a new machine.
@scottyboyy99 it is ?? Sadly the i7 of the MacBook does not have hyperthreading. BTW i put a 7200rpm hdd in it.. if it makes any difference to the 5400rpm disk in this benchmark test. Thanks for your comment.
Core 2 Duo and Core i3 architecture is very different. Core 2 Duo is dual core and thats it. Core i3 is a dual core that also has two virtual cores so it shows up as 4 cores. My HP dv6 laptop has the Core i3 and it indeed shows up as 4 processors in the device manager. My best friend has the Core 2 Duo on his HP laptop and it only shows up as two processors. Also some of the newer Core "i' series processors also turbo boost whereas the Core Duo series doesn't.
@TJC450 I don't know that much about it as I just use it for music, but as I understand it boots into 32 bit by default, but you can boot into 64 bit by holding down 6 & 4 when you turn the machine on.
@TJC450@TJC450 I'm also guessing it's that way because apps are still being written in 32 bit. Just as older ppc macs shipped with OS X and OS 9 classic to give developers time to migrate to the newer OS. But that's about all I know.
@TJC450 Yeah, most apps are, but a few still aren't. Someone like MrBit10 would know a lot more about this than me tho, so might be worth asking him (or someone at the store / apple tech support). I kinda understand 16, 24, 32 bit + sampling frequencies such as 44.1, 48, 88.2, 96Khz when it comes to audio files, but not computing language :-)XD
I have the same generation iMac as yours, Dave, but mine is the 24" with the 3.06 GHz Core 2 Duo. Otherwise, it is identical to yours. Mine scored a 4276.
Hey Dave & everyone. I'm running a Macbook White Unibody October 2009 (2.26 c2d, 2gb ddr3, 250 hdd) GeekBench score... 3238. Does this seem right, or a little slow? Anyone with the same model, let me know, cheers guys (&gals) Rodge.
have you run a benchmark on your Macbook Pro? and does/will the result change over time or should it stay the same. Great video's mate really enjoy watching.
I bought a 24"imac the next refresh to yours in 2008 and now have a imac 27"quadcore i7 it was the right time for me to get a more powerful one im seriously impressed with the new one.led backlit faster ram next gen processor,unibody also a new architecture inside its a very decent upgrade this time round which tempted me.
@m4kk393 I'd guess it's because the memory controller is on the CPU so it didn't find it in the north-bridge where they usually are pre "i" series, so it didn't detect it. It runs at 1333MHz I believe.
These synthetic benchmarks i always feel don't show real results, can you do some cinebench or unzipping a file and compare it? I love real life results which you will notice everyday.
The 24" looks better than the 21,5" , but i will buy a 21,5" tomorrow :D
R4ndomUsername 2 weeks ago
i love this video i cant wait to get one next week
MultiCpfan101 2 weeks ago
I think the older ones look better , I don't know why but the black back of the 08 really draws me in, and I actually like the aluminum bezel .
iAmInsaine22 1 month ago
Do the keys on the 21.5 inch get dirty and wear down fast?
Bmskiboard17 1 month ago
I prefer the 24in for some reason lol
BlubberOwl 2 months ago
im still up in the air on macs i want one but i dont know im pc all the way and actually find windows 7 to work realy well
toyota420xp 2 months ago
@toyota420xp you can get a windows software on the mac if you know enyone that knows how to do it
ishmifyi 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
is there a shortcut on a mac like the ctrl-alt-delete on windows.?
tolisBFMV 3 months ago
well.... my laptop just scored a very.... effortless score of 1078 on geekbench :/
HaztaUK 3 months ago
Next week i'm getting the base 21.5 inch imac as replacement for my 2006 core2duo 2 ghz, i am pretty confident it will blow it away completely. kind of like when i went from an iphone 3g to a galaxy s2 but tht aside nice vid man! awesome screen indeed i can't wait ;DDDD
Blizering 3 months ago
Nice.
tski007 4 months ago
I own the I max g22rq 551 with a z22o _pcur
tski007 4 months ago
@MademoiselleAda the bit under the monitor is too big on the 24". On the 21" it looks slick and doesnt stand out as much.
anil2 5 months ago
the 24" imac looks ugly compared to the 21"
anil2 6 months ago
Just thought I'd let you know that the difference between the GPU's has nothing to do with your results. Geekbench only tests the RAM and the CPU, if you want to see the true difference between the two iMacs run something like 3DMark or PhotoShop rendereing tasks.
DanMan91693 10 months ago 2
I have a 5770 result on my iMac 21.5" i3 and 3490 on my imac 24" core 2 duo
Reneyssa 11 months ago
does the 21.5 have hyperthreading ??
theotherbull 1 year ago
@theotherbull says so on the website, can u explain what hyperthreading is? i'm not exactly clear on that
SylabikHipHop 11 months ago
@SylabikHipHop it adds to threads so it multi tasks better so if you were to open the task manager it would show 4 cores on a duel core
theotherbull 11 months ago
@theotherbull ahhh alright, does anybody know how well the entry level imac games? i have the 2009 macbook pro actually, 2,26 c2d with a 9400m 256 mb card, i can play cod at around 3/4 graphics and dead space 1 and 2 at almost full so im assuming this machine is gonna run these games a lot better despite the resolution increase right? (1280 by 800) on the macbook pro (1920 by 1080) on the imac
SylabikHipHop 11 months ago
@theotherbull the i7 version of the 21.5" does have HT.
dude4104200 8 months ago
Dude i BEG YOU REPLY TO THIS :/
The new baseline imac has a geekbench score of about 5700 , while this new baseline macbook pro has 6471 ?!
Does that mean the macbook pro is FASTER ?!
in terms of gaming , and video editing , will the macbook pro benefit me better?
Because i was all set to get the imac but then i saw its geekbench score and now im really confused :/
Help ?
AwesomeTeeVee 1 year ago
@AwesomeTeeVee depends on what you're doing. If you're editing video i suggest the macbook pro. If you're gaming i suggest iMac
amdemand 1 year ago
@amdemand BOTH !
AwesomeTeeVee 1 year ago
@AwesomeTeeVee than get the imac 27 with a quad-core i7processor for fast multi-tasking and video editing,better graphics (2560-by-1440 resolution), THE BIGGER SCREEN FOR BETTER QUALITY, 2X THE STORAGE SPACE FOR VIDEOS AND DOCUMENTS...THATS MY RECOMANDATION unless you're going to move around with THE COMPUTER ;)
amdemand 1 year ago
@amdemand crap :/
dude i got awesome grades , so my parents agreed to get it for me , but i cant ask for the expensive one haha :/ they will say no and tell me im a spoiled kid .....
Oh god i hate this :(
AwesomeTeeVee 1 year ago
@AwesomeTeeVee what's your price range?
amdemand 1 year ago
@amdemand i can only get the baseline models
:/
so basically 1199 dollars
AwesomeTeeVee 1 year ago
@AwesomeTeeVee if you have someone who goes to school or like uni, then get them to enter in their details in the online store and youll get LOTS of discounts even on the upgrades (like RAM n stuff) i got my 27 inch like that...
jack390 1 year ago
Why is the imac 32 bit?
It's amazing and Apple makes it 32 bit WHY?
tino730 1 year ago
@tino730 i don't know why they call it 32 bit
i was wondering the same you know
but if you look in preferences you'll see most of the programs
run in 64 bit
rubenandpimslapping 1 year ago
@rubenandpimslapping Haha I think he meant why did Apple downgrade the computer lol
mtmatrix3 1 year ago
@mtmatrix3 then i think i misunderstood him xd
rubenandpimslapping 1 year ago
That's shit I wanted a real speed test
mrsuper111king 1 year ago
umm.. i got 649 :( its a ppc mac mini
Kyorere23 1 year ago
The 24 inch looks chubby .
:P
Degarem 1 year ago
i like the 21.5 inch iMac is smexxi! ;))
spikesan2211 1 year ago
My old laptop still runs on celeron m I think. (I threw the sticker away)
venombladepictures 1 year ago
@venombladepictures then go to computer properties.
tino730 1 year ago
ya, geek bench isn't actually free
tallblondekid 1 year ago
@tallblondekid yeah it is
schnitzer12 1 year ago
do 1080p youtube videos play smooth on the core i3 iMac?
i only ask because it was stuttering when i tried this in the apple store on saturday :(
thestevedotcom 1 year ago
@thestevedotcom, i think the 3.06 does have a little trouble, i have the 3.2 i3 21.5 1080p videoz run brilliantly, (after they've buffered ofcourse)
dabadboyuzi 1 year ago
@dabadboyuzi i just got the 3.06 21.5" iMac and YouTube 1080p runs amazingly smooth (once again when they have fully buffered) :)
thestevedotcom 1 year ago
@thestevedotcom thats cuz of flash 10.1... i have the same problem with my 27 inch core 2 duo... so adobe better fix that!
jack390 1 year ago
Dave wants one haha
Pinkishbass91 1 year ago
2010 27" iMac i7 got 6796
Harlei3 1 year ago
in fairness dave that 08 imac specs are crap even by 08 standards.
TheZeenew 1 year ago
@TheZeenew are you kidding? -.- even for today that standards that's really good
thehouseofnothing 1 year ago
my 2006 white imac got 2700
SOUTHWESTENZ 1 year ago
I have the 27 inch imac it is HUGEEEEEEEEE :| you know how you never know what size something will be until you have it in your hands well lets just say my mouth stayed wide open the enitre time i unboxed the 27incher :|
nav19891989 1 year ago
Dude get a better camera. The videos hazy
XxHardcorexxGamerxX 1 year ago
my laptop got a decent 1550 :) happy with that
000TheGingerOne000 1 year ago
My computer got a respectable 4800
gmaster45612374 1 year ago
isn't the 21.5 inch iMac 64 bit ?
zaraka2 1 year ago
@zaraka2 OSX is a weird hybrid of 32 and 64bit
gmaster45612374 1 year ago
Hi Dave. Just to let you know, the benchmark you're using does not measure GPU performance. It measures only CPU and memory performance. A much better overall benchmark is Xbench which takes every major component of the system into consideration. The machine you're measuring can then be compared to a database of similar and previous machines dating back years. And it's entirely free. Hope this helps.
iruvdoggies 1 year ago
Comment removed
iruvdoggies 1 year ago
My August '07 20" 2.4 GHz iMac only gets around a 2400. Plus it likes to get too hot. Makes me want that i3 T__T
carlheanerd 1 year ago
2612 MAcBook Pro 13 2009
ACMiLan1113 1 year ago
@ACMiLan1113 really my macbook pro 13 has 2gb ram 2.26ghz core 2 duo mid 2009 and it gets 3238
iTalkApple96 1 year ago
@iTalkApple96
Same here, I guess I'm straining it more...
ACMiLan1113 1 year ago
My score is pretty good, ITS OVER 9000!!!!!!!!!
PsYcHoMiKe99 1 year ago
My score : 4296
iMac 24 inch early 2009 : Core 2 duo E8435 @ 3.06 Ghz, 4 GB 1067 Mhz DDR3 RAM, Mac Os 10.6.4, ATI radeon HD 4850 (512MB), 1 TB HD
Isengardtom 1 year ago
I don't remember my score exactly, but it was around 12000
8lindfury 1 year ago
Dave, good review !! the clock speed at 3.06 ghz is pretty high on the 21 inch, considering it's only the basic entry level iMac.That makes it compete well against competitiors in the same price range.Sure, you can get a pc much cheaper with the i3, but I'm sure the clock speed would be alot lower.It also explains why the benchmark is alot higher than the 24 inch iMac with the core 2 duo. Also, I love the black borders pushed to the edge on the 21 inch.It gives it a much more polished look.
mannypeligroso 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
looks a lot bigger than 3 inches
coolfreak1mannan 1 year ago
my late 2009 macbook get 2863
macifaction 1 year ago
o.o If I wanted a Mac I would go for the new one but I would rather have the older keyboard... I hate keyboards without a numpad.
gmanprime500 1 year ago
@gmanprime500 I'm glad they still have the "old" keyboard option if you're buying a computer online. I need that numberpad!
chrisman324 1 year ago
@chrisman324 The Apple keyboards have a horrible feel. The keys are flat.
RSProjectX 1 year ago
@RSProjectX I love that the keys are flat.
braddudeguy 1 year ago
@braddudeguy The best keyboards are the ones with slightly tapered keys. In addition, the keyboard should slightly curve inward around the middle horizontally.
RSProjectX 1 year ago
@RSProjectX Everyone has their own preference.
braddudeguy 1 year ago
@gmanprime500 when you're customizing your mac online you can chose the old keyboard with number pad at not difference in cost
chamca 1 year ago
My 15" i7 MacBook Pro got a Geekbench score of 6731.
Kubblex 1 year ago
My budget custom build PC got 6035. It was about $850 including the monitor.
Fathead2098 1 year ago
@Fathead2098 Sorry I ment to say not including the monitor. It was about $1000 total.
Fathead2098 1 year ago
the 21 inch display has the 16:9 aspect ratio where as the old one has the 16:10
shehanster 1 year ago
My iMac i7 Geekbench Score 8604.
Mamako0 1 year ago
Does the iMac come with Leopard or Snow Leopard?
mkextremerTV 1 year ago
@mkextremerTV Assuming you're asking about the i3, SL.
Westsound191 1 year ago
@Westsound191 About the 2.93GHz i7
mkextremerTV 1 year ago
@mkextremerTV SL for sure - as with any new mac from August last year. You will always get the newest version at the time of purchase if it is a new machine.
Hope this helps.
Westsound191 1 year ago
@Westsound191 Thanks man :)
mkextremerTV 1 year ago
@mkextremerTV :-)
Westsound191 1 year ago
5684 on my MacBook Pro i7 2010. Hmm..
McgregorKLB 1 year ago
@McgregorKLB thats really good!
scottyboyy99 1 year ago
@scottyboyy99 it is ?? Sadly the i7 of the MacBook does not have hyperthreading. BTW i put a 7200rpm hdd in it.. if it makes any difference to the 5400rpm disk in this benchmark test. Thanks for your comment.
McgregorKLB 1 year ago
Core 2 Duo and Core i3 architecture is very different. Core 2 Duo is dual core and thats it. Core i3 is a dual core that also has two virtual cores so it shows up as 4 cores. My HP dv6 laptop has the Core i3 and it indeed shows up as 4 processors in the device manager. My best friend has the Core 2 Duo on his HP laptop and it only shows up as two processors. Also some of the newer Core "i' series processors also turbo boost whereas the Core Duo series doesn't.
clemsonbloke 1 year ago
I thought Mac OS X was 64 bit?
TJC450 1 year ago
@TJC450 It is.
Westsound191 1 year ago
@Westsound191 but it said on the thing it was 32 bit so which is it?
TJC450 1 year ago
@TJC450 I don't know that much about it as I just use it for music, but as I understand it boots into 32 bit by default, but you can boot into 64 bit by holding down 6 & 4 when you turn the machine on.
Westsound191 1 year ago
@TJC450 @TJC450 I'm also guessing it's that way because apps are still being written in 32 bit. Just as older ppc macs shipped with OS X and OS 9 classic to give developers time to migrate to the newer OS. But that's about all I know.
Westsound191 1 year ago
@Westsound191 ok because I was looking on my imac and some of the apps like finder are in 64 bit.
TJC450 1 year ago
@TJC450 Yeah, most apps are, but a few still aren't. Someone like MrBit10 would know a lot more about this than me tho, so might be worth asking him (or someone at the store / apple tech support). I kinda understand 16, 24, 32 bit + sampling frequencies such as 44.1, 48, 88.2, 96Khz when it comes to audio files, but not computing language :-)XD
Westsound191 1 year ago
@Westsound191 well thanks for the help :)
TJC450 1 year ago
@TJC450 No problem :-)
Westsound191 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have the same generation iMac as yours, Dave, but mine is the 24" with the 3.06 GHz Core 2 Duo. Otherwise, it is identical to yours. Mine scored a 4276.
jare500 1 year ago
Comment removed
jare500 1 year ago
Excellent, Dave! I will run this later today and stop back.
Have a good weekend!
Tim
chessdude67 1 year ago
my quad core(Q8200) hackintosh scored a 5752 on geekbench (64 bit)
thatsmybit 1 year ago
Wtf? almost same specs on my
macbook!? 2.4 and your is 2.8 and the same ram.
Degarem 1 year ago
Macbook Pro (2010 i7) - 5800 in 32 bit.
Westsound191 1 year ago
Hey Dave & everyone. I'm running a Macbook White Unibody October 2009 (2.26 c2d, 2gb ddr3, 250 hdd) GeekBench score... 3238. Does this seem right, or a little slow? Anyone with the same model, let me know, cheers guys (&gals) Rodge.
Queeg500RD 1 year ago
@Queeg500RD Yep that's right. I have a similar machine with similar score.
drummerkid1993 1 year ago
have you run a benchmark on your Macbook Pro? and does/will the result change over time or should it stay the same. Great video's mate really enjoy watching.
mugan78 1 year ago
ive found the new imac to be slower on startup and have had major issues with the firewire port. prefer my old imac but maybe i just got a dud.
Hoohaaboo 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
3688 on a early 2010 macbook pro 13 inch. with 2,66Ghz, 4Gb ram
UltimateMiffy 1 year ago
3330 on a early 2010 macbook pro 13 inch. Wow, the imac certainly has more power
themaskedguitarman 1 year ago
@themaskedguitarman yeah I've got pretty much the same result with my macbook pro. I've got the same macbook as you
godofallv1 1 year ago
the new one makes the 24 inch look so dated
YEE941 1 year ago
I bought a 24"imac the next refresh to yours in 2008 and now have a imac 27"quadcore i7 it was the right time for me to get a more powerful one im seriously impressed with the new one.led backlit faster ram next gen processor,unibody also a new architecture inside its a very decent upgrade this time round which tempted me.
creamywhip 1 year ago
Personaly i wouldn't treat geekbench as a fair Benchmark.
and whats up with the core i3 imac having 0Mhz ram, fail
m4kk393 1 year ago
@m4kk393 I'd guess it's because the memory controller is on the CPU so it didn't find it in the north-bridge where they usually are pre "i" series, so it didn't detect it. It runs at 1333MHz I believe.
TalesOfWar 1 year ago
These synthetic benchmarks i always feel don't show real results, can you do some cinebench or unzipping a file and compare it? I love real life results which you will notice everyday.
hord 1 year ago