Argentina's Kirchner sworn in for second term

[krackersdave]

No mention of her immediately seizing control of the free-press in Argentina? Not a good sign.. couple that with battering the war drums and nationalist rubbish she mouths and the signs are not good for Argentina.....

Peron all over again...

[trevortrevortsr2]

Nice to see a dynamicl woman with some passona - Lets hope she doesn't impail herself on that boggy Island issue

[22ndWave]

Murdering bitch. She's a modern day Galtieri guilty of extortion and political assassination of her deputy trade secretary. Fuck Kirchner. How can you tell when Argentina's leaders are corrupt? When they distract the people with crap like the Falkland islands. Like I said. No difference between this bitch and Argentina's old dictator.

[esunsinverguenza]

@22ndWave you are soooooo wrong

[Iker888]

She's too authoritarian and narrowminded, even though the crisis was handled very well by argentine economists under Kirchner, her current policies and spiraling inflation are going to cause some major damage in the near future.

[terwilligar1981]

@Iker888 Perhaps you are right in that she may come across as an authritarian. But make no mistake reults speak for themselves and at the moment she has been playing her cards right and will continue to stay in power as long as she does her job and keep the people content. But yes hopefully the power and success she has now will not go to her head. Keep her their so long as she does a respectible job.

[Iker888]

@terwilligar1981 Her investments are usually well placed (with the notable exception of a couple dozen million in football channels), but she is spending way too much, and printing like crazy to cover the costs. Now Argentina is almost as expensive as many first world countries, but the people have little spending capital. You have no idea how insanely expensive things are getting, and if it continues this way the drop in demand will obliterate growth.

[Valenbaires]

@terwilligar1981 So we will

[terwilligar1981]

Argentina is a new hope for the world. Kirchner is the prime example to what politician should do in that she puts her country before the world or any worldly affairs. May the IMF and World Banks fail. Hoplefully other countries will follow Argentina's example. God bless that nation and Iceland for resisting world dominion and unification. They will remain free.

[katoyushiromitsu]

@terwilligar1981 I think your president isn't doing what is right, rather she is doing what is popular.

[terwilligar1981]

@katoyushiromitsu Yes, many of here policies are questionable at best. I do not agree with all of her views or actions. But the one thing I really admire about her most is that she was not going to give into the banks. Namely the IFM and World Banks who exist to cause debt and enslave people with it by offering loans and then charge interests that are almost impossible to pay back. REMEMBER...barrower is slave to the lender. She would not barrow. Least last I heard.

[krackersdave]

@terwilligar1981 Are you for real??? She's banged the war drums and spouted dangerous nationalistic hate to win the election then turns round and seizes control of the free press????? Argentina is only going one way ... dictatorship...

[terwilligar1981]

@krackersdave My friend you build a people, their pride, their culture, and their welfare while looking strong. Or you can look weak by rolling out the red carpet by allowing outside influences to take over your country politically, financially, morally, culturally, and everything in between. I do not agree with everything this lady does. But make no mistake if given the chance the world would use Argentina and then throw it away like it did in the past with it's economy.

[krackersdave]

@terwilligar1981 Wow - as the world gets smaller and moves together on common ground you want to build walls and split it into them and us??? You worry about this undefined "world" as using you?? I think it's clear Kirchner and her band of anti-democratic loonies are already using you....

[Loltochapel]

God bless Latin America! After years of oppresion by US impearlist, Latin America is finally emancipated and has its best days ahead of them. VIVA Kirchner, VIVA Morales, VIVA Rouseff, VIVA Chavez, VIVA UNASUR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[88donja]

She's hot!

[excitedsynapses]

She recognized Palestine, God bless her. I wish her the best! Thank you Argentina, Brazil, and all the other Latin American countries that support us.

[SkullOfYorick]

The people of the Falkland Islands want the Falkland Islands to remain British. End of story. If Kirchner really wants land to be returned to past owners, maybe she should advocate the return of Argentina to Spanish ownership.

[esunsinverguenza]

@SkullOfYorick what are you talking about?

[SkullOfYorick]

@esunsinverguenza Argentina claims the Falkland Islands, even though they have been British for longer than the current Argentine constitution has been in force and almost as long as Argentina has been independent, and even though, most importantly, the Falkland Islanders overwhelmingly want to remain British.

[esunsinverguenza]

@SkullOfYorick so...you insult anyone who is against colonialism? where are you from?

[SkullOfYorick]

@esunsinverguenza How is the British policy on the Falkland Islands colonialist? It's perfectly democratic. Argentina is a country based on Spanish colonialism.

[esunsinverguenza]

@SkullOfYorick please, get a dictionary.

[florhh14]

@SkullOfYorick if it was based in colonialism we would never have become independent. it's totally the opposite, we made a revolution in 1810 against colonialism. luckily we won.

[SkullOfYorick]

@florhh14 No. The colonists rebelled against their pay-masters. If any thing, 'independence' probably made things worse for the indigenous population, as was the case with the USA.

[florhh14]

@SkullOfYorick there was a lot of indians and mestizos (gauchos) in our armies at the revolution. they all went to fight because they felt they were argentinians. So the fact we were a spanish colony doesn't mean we are a white - european country who doesn't represent natives. and the situation of indians has been always the same since columbus came in 1492.luckily our countries are learning and they feel represented especially in Bolivia where they have an indigenous president

[SkullOfYorick]

@florhh14 So, you're advocating the principle of self-determination? Why doesn't Argentina extend that same courtesy to the Falkland Islands. The Falklanders want to remain British, or, to put it another way, they want to remain independent of Argentina. Annexing a territory with a hostile population will lead to big trouble.

[florhh14]

@SkullOfYorick the principle of self determination don't work in this case.because there was a forced ocupation in the beggining.After that it's no longer valid.The UN says in this cases things workout with dialogue, without forgeting islanders interests BUT NOT BASING IT ONLY IN THAT. Are different things. Argentina has said they'll always respect their way of life. And if England change their position we could reech an agree. but you can't find a solution if they don't acces at first place.

[SkullOfYorick]

@florhh14 Compared to most settlements, the British settlement of the Falkland Islands was peaceful. Certainly, it was far more peaceful than Argentina's killing of millions of natives and the seizure of their land. Argentina has a terrible track record when it comes to respecting other people's way of life. Imagine, if you were to wake up one day, to find yourself in a different country, just because your locality is geographically close to another country. Wouldn't you think that unfair?

[florhh14]

@SkullOfYorick It was peaceful for the simply fact no native settled there permanently. We all know what would happen if there was natives: you would have kicked them out, just like you did with argentinians. No one believes you are a peaceful country. You have a terrible record around the world. geographically they are in south america, not in Europe. But there's a lot of reasons why they are argentinian, not only that.

[SkullOfYorick]

@florhh14 Which country doesn't have a terrible record? The only reasonable way to decide which state should control which piece of land is to let the people living there decide. Any other policy would allow any country to claim any land. Britain was very lenient on Argentina last time. Next time, Argentina might actually be punished.

[florhh14]

@SkullOfYorick Argentina is not going to impose anything to them. They can keep their way of life. I repeated that 100 times. We can't be punished because we are reclaming through legal ways, using organizations like the UN. About self - determination is a long issue. The UN said both countries shoud dialogue, without forgeting islanders interests,but not basing it only in that.However if there was a forced ocupation in 1833, when there was other people, that argument loses some validity.

[SkullOfYorick]

@florhh14 Argentina wants to impose Argentine sovereignty on the islanders. I can't think of any greater possible imposition than that. The UN says a lot of things. Two of the five permanent members of the Security Council are corrupt dictatorships, and the Human Rights Council is full of countries that abuse human rights. The UN isn't always right.

[florhh14]

@SkullOfYorick We wan't our sovereignty over the island, not over the islanders.. Two different things xD They can be argentinian citizens (because they live in argentinian territory), but they could keep their british nationality. They could keep their language, and all that. The UN supports dialogue, not Argentina.. It's different. Because if there's a conflict between 2 civilized countries, that's the best way to resolve them.But if England refuses, we'll be like this forever.

[SkullOfYorick]

@florhh14 You want to take their land. Would you be happy for Brazil to claim Argentine land, as long as Brazil promised to allow the local population to continue living there? Of course, you wouldn't be happy for that to happen, even if hypothetically Brazil may once have owned the land. I don't mind being "like this for ever". It's the Argentine people who will get hurt from all this posturing. Kirchner is just trying to distract your attention from domestic problems.

[Alexxanndrias]

@esunsinverguenza no polemicemos con los ingleses, la madre naturaleza y el calentamiento global se encargara de ellos, nosotros sabemos sobre su meta colonialista basta ver sus pretensiones sobre la Antártida.

[SkullOfYorick]

@esunsinverguenza The British are defending the principle of self-determination. Argentina, however, greedily wants to annex land that arguably never belonged to it in the first place, and whose citizens bitterly loathe the idea of becoming part of Argentina. Who is the colonial aggressor?

[florhh14]

@SkullOfYorick You can't know what Argentina wants if you deny dialogue. If the UK wanted to dialogue, we could have a deal between the 2 countries, respecting islanders interests. The only thing Argentina always said was that we'd never change the way they live. And if they wanted to remain british they could have a double nationality or something like that. There's a lot of foreigners living here,they are argentinian citizens but they keep their nationality too.

[SkullOfYorick]

@florhh14 So, if Brazil, for example, wanted shared sovereignty of some neighbouring Argentine land, you would think it reasonable for Argentina to enter into dialogue, even if the local population wanted to remain Argentine and didn't want shared sovereignty? And, as for not changing their way of life, how would you verify that? And how can any one trust Argentina, which thought it acceptable to kill Falkland Islanders during the 1982 war.

[florhh14]

@SkullOfYorick It'different,because the island has always been in dispute between the 2 countries. Well that's why i'm talking about an agreement. Britain could accept puting the condition that Argentina would never change the way they live. But you can be sure about that. Argentina always declared it. Also because there's many cultures living in our country and we respect diversity.And if we wanted to make a war do you think we would be insisting to dialogue?that's the first think we made clear

[SkullOfYorick]

@florhh14 Many of the borders between Latin American countries have always been in dispute too; so the analogy stands. No territory can possibly be annexed without altering the lives of the people who live there, and, if Argentina didn't in some way want to alter things there, why would Argentina want to annex the islands? If the only condition for respecting diversity is not killing other ethnicities, then, I suppose, modern-day Argentina just about qualifies...

[florhh14]

@SkullOfYorick In our case, we don't have any border in dispute, except the Falklands. Why you say that? I think it's totally possible. The only different thing is that tey'll have a different president, and maybe argentinian population will live there. But there's 30 argentinians already, and there's no problems between them. About killing other ethnicities that's a mistake every country made. Today we respect our native population and they have rights as any argentinian citizen.

[esunsinverguenza]

@SkullOfYorick wrong....self determination doesn´t aply here because that people were implanted here when the british empire evicted the population in 1833

[SkullOfYorick]

@esunsinverguenza Well, Argentina can give its land back to the descendants of the millions of slaughtered natives, and then we'll talk.

[lovetohate028]

Get your eyes off the Falklands, South Georgia, and Sandwich islands whore!

[JewTube001]

I use to be sworn into Kichner, until I took an arrow to the knee

[llinsane1ll]

@JewTube001 Stfu with that stupid meme.

[JewTube001]

@llinsane1ll I use to stfu with that stupid meme like you, then I took an arrow to the knee.

[llinsane1ll]

@JewTube001 Point taken. You're a loser who needs to grow up.

[JewTube001]

@llinsane1ll I use to be a loser who needed to grow up, then I took an arrow to the knee.

[JuanVoyce]

Cristina Kirchner? I thought Cristina Fernadez won?

[PainandMotivation]

who screwed Kirchner her senator?? can anyone give me the infor

[esunsinverguenza]

@PainandMotivation the question is not clear enough

[PainandMotivation]

@esunsinverguenza her former vice president whom the president Kirchner considers a traitor who is that?

[esunsinverguenza]

@PainandMotivation Cobos betrayed her by voting against the goverment on a bill for taxing farmers over their exports.

[esunsinverguenza]

@PainandMotivation Julio Cobos

[GtrDudeL]

how's that reporter babe... schwing!

[asaieast]

Balogna. YouTube has become a right wing operation.

[javy926]

AlJazeera has become an arabic right wing network, the FOX news of the middle East the way they portrait Cristina as an athoritarian is just unbeliable bias, and the guy who they used for commentary, Redrado an arrogant formal central bank president how though that he was more poweful than the president and refused to leave his post after Cristina fired him, he represent that old banking power who used to put and take down presidents in Latin America, well that’s over. !!!

[BcmAVMHRVq]

@javy926 Oh fuck off you bigot. Prime example of a retard who lashes out anything and anyone that disagrees on him on even the smallest things. AJE maintained a largely bias-free objective representation in this video. Even after they talked about the _reality_ that she is one of Argentina's most powerful presidents, they quickly go back to mentioning that she has a largely good relationship with the people, having managed to win them over and secure her position as president.

[oiimKadSAm]

@javy926 Maybe you should start watching Fox news, since you're looking for a biased non-critical image of everything that conforms to your views.