not to take away from this play because its obviously a great show of athleticism but when the defender isnt even contesting the shot its hard to say it was all that. now if the defender goes up against him right there can he still finish with that type of power and explosiveness.
Just to be clear, again, it's a good dunk. Could do without the taunt, but good dunk, great leap. And I don't mind seeing some facial nuts on a guy who gives up on defense and just tries to take a charge where they're not going to give it to him.
Actually this IS what you call "posterized" but I'm pretty sure you didn't know that being the dunking aficionado you are. He set himself up to be dunked on by trying to "take a charge" while standing almost directly under the basket. He added himself to the basketball card. He is, in fact, posterized.
Already answered. Just have to agree to disagree. I'm not disrespecting, and he's an unbelievable leaper (def. worth a look at his other vids), I'm just saying this one isn't quite top-shelf, for reasons cited in two previous posts. Gotta be something more to getting in the top-top group than jumping into/partially over a stationary guy on a fast break, with no preceding move of any distinction and nobody doing anything to play any real defense on him.
Nice excuse, all worked out for any player who taunts. Works with Tiger Woods and others in golf, various tennis players, etc., too. As if today's players were "more intense" or "more competitive" than guys like Russell, Erving, et al.
It's classless behavior however you want to make excuses for it, and it's too bad the standard allows for it now. You can be unbelievably intense and still show self-restraint. Too bad. Still a good dunk, but it'd be nice to see him buck the trend.
There is a restricted area, they just don't have a line showing exactly what it is. He was definitely in it because it is the space in between the backboard and the front of the rim. So a blocking foul should have actually been called as well.
ummm chipeckmd, you can draw a charge from anywhere on a COLLEGE court. Can you be posterized if you draw a charge? plus he shuffled his foot at the last second trying to get directly in his way, which probably ruined any chance of getting a call.
people have a clue and this could have gone either way if a call would have been made. ther correct call should have been a blocking foul. the defender never came set until the anderson was well in the air. at that time he is endanginering the players safety by basically getting underneath him in a vulnerable position. i agree that he was posterized though. anderson has some serious hops.
OK, noone writing comments here has a clue. First of all, there was no call because the defender was under the rim, where you can't draw a charge. He was set, by the way.
And, another thing-- he was posterized. emncaity, you are lost, son. Freeze the frame at 17 seconds. That, my friend, is a poster; one that I would put on my wall, in fact. When another man's genitals are in your face as he dunks on you, you've been posterized. Period. Go back to dunk class.
No argument on the charge. Relatively close (at live-action speed), but good no-call.
Still no go on "posterized." Great leaping ability, awesome athleticism, OK dunk. When the junk's in your face, that means you didn't even try. When you're Patrick Ewing and you get "Spalding" (or "Wilson" or whoever the NBA was using then) backwards on your face, that's posterized.
Always a possibility of the play being called a charge given how bad college refs are. But if you look closely, the defender is shufling his feet and moving forward. If anything it should have been a blocking foul. good tough call though, could have gone either way
I agree. To be "posterized" you gotta be up at the rim, defending the dunk. And this WOULD have been a charge if the CSUN dude hadn't been shuffling his feet. Plus, there's no semi-circle in college ball. A charge/block can happen anywhere on the court. That said, Anderson is still a helluva dunker.
Getting a grip here: First of all, what's great about a dunk is almost never the dunk itself (which is proven in dunk contests) but the move that got you there. Like, for instance (with youtube stem):
Also what can make a "posterizing": Smaller guy goes over taller guy who's actually athletic, airborne, and making an effort. Like this (last angle is best): /watch?v=CZ_PsJplxaQ
And : /watch?v=dSpvx6Gvzc8&feature=related
Also, dunking on guy who has rep as great defender, is in position the whole way, and still can't stop you: /watch?v=-0v1SQ0QCSc&feature=related
Anderson's was good. But THAT sh$% (above) is "posterized."
As for the guy being "posterized"....he was. While dunking on a defender trying to block the shot is a more spectacular form of posterizing, dunking on a defender trying to take a charge is still posterizing. The bottom line is, the defender blocked the path between the guy with the ball and the basket, and the player went through the defender to dunk the ball. Posterize...
If you read my post from earlier, I was saying that it was not a charge, just as you have said. The defender is by no means outside of the imaginary half circle. The half circle has a four foot radius from the center of the basket and the defender is only 1-2 feet away from the basket at most. And yes, there is a question to whether the defender got planted in time. I believe he did, but because he was in the imaginary half circle, it is definitely a foul by the defender. A
His front foot is more like 2 feet, but I'll concede that, had this been a pro game, it almost certainly wouldn't have been called a charge. I don't have any sympathy for the defender, don't get me wrong; he should've made a play on the guy rather than giving up and trying to take a charge where it probably wasn't going to be called.
Ok, listen up people. This was by NO means a charge. IF any of you have played basketball on the collegiate level like I have you would know that the defender was almost directly under the basket, thus making it a foul. One has to envision an imaginary half circle, known as the restricted area in the pros, around the basket where the defender cannot be standing if he is to take a charge. I'm the 6'7 white guy who got dunked on plenty of times so I think I know a little about this sort of thing
I think you're too extreme here. I did play, and I was also an SID responsible for stat crews (and was involved heavily with NCAA rules, etc.). The thing that might make this not a charge, though, is not only that he's probably within the pro half-circle, but also that it's a pretty close call as to whether the guy was planted before the last opportunity Anderson had to change directions. It's close.
@emncaity - so when vince carter dunks over the head of a 7 foot ukrainian trying to take a charge....or tmac basically sits on bradley's shoulders dunking while bradly isn't trying to block him.....you wouldn't consider those "posterizations"?
the dude got slammed to the ground after the dunker's junk smacked him in the face. how is that not a poster?
I would not call them "posterizations," no. I would use the term to describe Carter dunking on a guy who's in position to stop him or to block the shot. He's certainly had more than his share of those, and it's no disrespect to call the one you describe an athletic, emphatic dunk that shows off leaping ability, rather than a "posterization." That's what I'd say about this one (in the vid).
What do you think the comment lists are for, just for fanboys like you to fall at the guy's feet? You think nobody can comment unless they love it as much as you do?
? The only way people would make a lot of comments is if they were "impressed by the clip"? Fact is, I posted a couple of things early--I think one or two responses to existing posts, plus one of my own--and everything since then has been a response to people filling up my inbox with what a f#$ktard I am for not worshiping the guy or agreeing that it's a "posterizing."
I'm not so upset about the no-call here. I'd say it was _somewhat_ close to a charge, but not close enough.
Here's what'd really be impressive: Guy gets good pass, in rhythm, dunks over stationary guy trying to take the charge, gets lucky not to have the charge called him, and DOESN'T stand there with the taunt like he did something. No coach should ever allow it. And don't even come in here with how they're "just competitive and showing their fire" crap. It ain't like Bill Russell et al. weren't "competitive."
I dont think it's a charge, b/c the defender was almost directly under the basket and there was no contact until after the ball was in the hoop. In any case though, I agree it's not a poster dunk at all...
Not that great, actually. The defender was doing what he was supposed to. Had charging been called, this clip wouldn't have been posted in the first place.
Charging is called in about 10% of the instances where it actually occurs. Guy has great leaping ability, but there's a difference between that and a "posterizing" dunk.
It's not getting posterized when you're just standing there trying to take a foul. That was essentially an uncontested dunk, so please, let's move on to the next dunk.
No kidding. Same for the one he just had in the Big West tournament. Some of the fanboys here need to get a grip. You're not "posterizing" somebody when you come in, with momentum, and/or with numbers, and the defender's only trying to take the foul. Nice athletic ability, no doubt, but still. (In the other dunk, the defender was only 6'0".) You want to see posterized, try that world-famous one where Jordan goes off on Ewing, after reversing directions off the dribble on the baseline.
didn't the assist man travel too?
Hitman2316 1 year ago
oh blah blah who cares if he taunts awesome dunk just enjoy:)
jdawg350 1 year ago
where's the technical for taunting??? I would have T'ed him up
Ravensguru52 1 year ago
Shocked he didn't get a Tech for taunting with the staredown. Sick dunk tho
Emil308 1 year ago
not to take away from this play because its obviously a great show of athleticism but when the defender isnt even contesting the shot its hard to say it was all that. now if the defender goes up against him right there can he still finish with that type of power and explosiveness.
jaredsw032 1 year ago
There is no restricted area in college, so a no call was the right call. the defender was planted and easily coulda got the call.
fghkjh 1 year ago
Just to be clear, again, it's a good dunk. Could do without the taunt, but good dunk, great leap. And I don't mind seeing some facial nuts on a guy who gives up on defense and just tries to take a charge where they're not going to give it to him.
emncaity 1 year ago
@emncaity
Actually this IS what you call "posterized" but I'm pretty sure you didn't know that being the dunking aficionado you are. He set himself up to be dunked on by trying to "take a charge" while standing almost directly under the basket. He added himself to the basketball card. He is, in fact, posterized.
ChiNigATL 1 year ago
ChiNig--
Already answered. Just have to agree to disagree. I'm not disrespecting, and he's an unbelievable leaper (def. worth a look at his other vids), I'm just saying this one isn't quite top-shelf, for reasons cited in two previous posts. Gotta be something more to getting in the top-top group than jumping into/partially over a stationary guy on a fast break, with no preceding move of any distinction and nobody doing anything to play any real defense on him.
emncaity 1 year ago
the intensity that produced the dunk, produced the taunt. Live with it.
mambochief 1 year ago
Nice excuse, all worked out for any player who taunts. Works with Tiger Woods and others in golf, various tennis players, etc., too. As if today's players were "more intense" or "more competitive" than guys like Russell, Erving, et al.
It's classless behavior however you want to make excuses for it, and it's too bad the standard allows for it now. You can be unbelievably intense and still show self-restraint. Too bad. Still a good dunk, but it'd be nice to see him buck the trend.
emncaity 1 year ago
definitely not a charge, he was on his way down when they made contact. dude just got victimized, it happens lol
willbabyboi1988 1 year ago
he was already in the air buy the time he initiated contact. that is NOT a charge.
SrustinLim 1 year ago
NASTY!
snareman08 1 year ago
Bottom line is, College needs to take the guessing game out of it and add a restricted area, while you're at it, push back the three point line.
blacklite911 1 year ago
blacklite--
Not a bad idea. Or pair of ideas.
emncaity 1 year ago
There is a restricted area, they just don't have a line showing exactly what it is. He was definitely in it because it is the space in between the backboard and the front of the rim. So a blocking foul should have actually been called as well.
fetalpigg 1 year ago
Great highlight reel and athleticism but what are the refs looking at, thats a charge (although not in the NBA).
JBright9939 1 year ago
Eat that cock boy... ha! He dunked his nut's on that dudes face, haha nut's to the face
domestic556 1 year ago
Comment removed
influence07 1 year ago
Slam in your fucking face with nut's on his head... And-1
domestic556 1 year ago
ummm chipeckmd, you can draw a charge from anywhere on a COLLEGE court. Can you be posterized if you draw a charge? plus he shuffled his foot at the last second trying to get directly in his way, which probably ruined any chance of getting a call.
yourstupidyouknowtha 1 year ago
people have a clue and this could have gone either way if a call would have been made. ther correct call should have been a blocking foul. the defender never came set until the anderson was well in the air. at that time he is endanginering the players safety by basically getting underneath him in a vulnerable position. i agree that he was posterized though. anderson has some serious hops.
smith8762 1 year ago
OK, noone writing comments here has a clue. First of all, there was no call because the defender was under the rim, where you can't draw a charge. He was set, by the way.
And, another thing-- he was posterized. emncaity, you are lost, son. Freeze the frame at 17 seconds. That, my friend, is a poster; one that I would put on my wall, in fact. When another man's genitals are in your face as he dunks on you, you've been posterized. Period. Go back to dunk class.
chippeckmd 1 year ago
chippeck--
No argument on the charge. Relatively close (at live-action speed), but good no-call.
Still no go on "posterized." Great leaping ability, awesome athleticism, OK dunk. When the junk's in your face, that means you didn't even try. When you're Patrick Ewing and you get "Spalding" (or "Wilson" or whoever the NBA was using then) backwards on your face, that's posterized.
emncaity 1 year ago
Always a possibility of the play being called a charge given how bad college refs are. But if you look closely, the defender is shufling his feet and moving forward. If anything it should have been a blocking foul. good tough call though, could have gone either way
egarcia6387 1 year ago
I agree. To be "posterized" you gotta be up at the rim, defending the dunk. And this WOULD have been a charge if the CSUN dude hadn't been shuffling his feet. Plus, there's no semi-circle in college ball. A charge/block can happen anywhere on the court. That said, Anderson is still a helluva dunker.
charlesreilly 1 year ago
Great dunk. 75%of the time, it would have been called charging.
parpar1192 1 year ago
Getting a grip here: First of all, what's great about a dunk is almost never the dunk itself (which is proven in dunk contests) but the move that got you there. Like, for instance (with youtube stem):
/watch?v=TkEVn1VUBlE
emncaity 1 year ago
Also what can make a "posterizing": Smaller guy goes over taller guy who's actually athletic, airborne, and making an effort. Like this (last angle is best): /watch?v=CZ_PsJplxaQ
And : /watch?v=dSpvx6Gvzc8&feature=related
Also, dunking on guy who has rep as great defender, is in position the whole way, and still can't stop you: /watch?v=-0v1SQ0QCSc&feature=related
Anderson's was good. But THAT sh$% (above) is "posterized."
School's out, chippeck. And you're welcome. ;-)
emncaity 1 year ago
that dude got rocked
1uff3y 1 year ago
Forget the dunk. What an A**hole for standing over the defender and trash talking in his face.
IamAchelous 1 year ago
@IamAchelous if that's how you're going to defend, you deserve all the trash that's spit your way.
rypergola 1 year ago
@IamAchelous
you have never played a contact sport have you?
and i KNOW you have never dunked on someone before.
so.shut.up.k?thx.bye
stylemasterrr 1 year ago
Anybody with the name stylemasterrrr...please.
Were you talking to me, or somebody else?
emncaity 1 year ago
@stylemasterrr - basketball is a contact sport? HA HA HA HA You are a funny guy!!! I have a Franklin that says you have never dunked.....
jrhandyman 1 year ago
It's a contact sport if you play in the right league. You're really not saying it isn't, are you?
emncaity 1 year ago
@jrhandyman
i been dunking since i was in the 8th grade. and i'm 33 now. if i post a vid of me dunking will you drop that franklin in my paypal?
stylemasterrr 1 year ago
FULLERTON!
i hate basketball but i love my city so ill root for the titans basketball.
DAMNNNNNNNNNNNNN!!!!!!!!!!!!!.........
TheZog13 1 year ago
you don't mess with the titans!!
sagy2hotie 1 year ago
DAAAAAMN!!!
headymoe 1 year ago
no.. i could give a shit if he was green
SuperK9111 1 year ago
Comment removed
jlaw333d 1 year ago
Comment removed
jlaw333d 1 year ago
most posters occur wen sum1 is tryin to take a charge, thats what their dumb ass gets
liflyguy 1 year ago
As for the guy being "posterized"....he was. While dunking on a defender trying to block the shot is a more spectacular form of posterizing, dunking on a defender trying to take a charge is still posterizing. The bottom line is, the defender blocked the path between the guy with the ball and the basket, and the player went through the defender to dunk the ball. Posterize...
DavidF330 1 year ago
Respectfully disagree. THIS is posterizing:
/watch?v=TkEVn1VUBlE
(with the youtube stem)
I mean, when that's the standard, you can't call it "posterizing" when you go over a stationary defender trying to take a charge. Please.
But I'm NOT saying it wasn't an emphatic dunk, or that the guy isn't a helluva leaper. He obviously is.
emncaity 1 year ago
If you watch the video, he takes 5 steps after catching the ball...isn't that a travel?
92bDad 1 year ago
he takes a really quick dribble right after the first two, then he does a hop step.
keepdigginprod 1 year ago 2
@92bDad - uh....he dribbled the ball then took a power skip step and jump. don't know what you're seeing here :)
tharpey 1 year ago
wasnt even close to a travel dude.
headymoe 1 year ago
Emncaity-
If you read my post from earlier, I was saying that it was not a charge, just as you have said. The defender is by no means outside of the imaginary half circle. The half circle has a four foot radius from the center of the basket and the defender is only 1-2 feet away from the basket at most. And yes, there is a question to whether the defender got planted in time. I believe he did, but because he was in the imaginary half circle, it is definitely a foul by the defender. A
DavidF330 1 year ago
His front foot is more like 2 feet, but I'll concede that, had this been a pro game, it almost certainly wouldn't have been called a charge. I don't have any sympathy for the defender, don't get me wrong; he should've made a play on the guy rather than giving up and trying to take a charge where it probably wasn't going to be called.
emncaity 1 year ago
Ok, listen up people. This was by NO means a charge. IF any of you have played basketball on the collegiate level like I have you would know that the defender was almost directly under the basket, thus making it a foul. One has to envision an imaginary half circle, known as the restricted area in the pros, around the basket where the defender cannot be standing if he is to take a charge. I'm the 6'7 white guy who got dunked on plenty of times so I think I know a little about this sort of thing
DavidF330 1 year ago
DavidF--
I think you're too extreme here. I did play, and I was also an SID responsible for stat crews (and was involved heavily with NCAA rules, etc.). The thing that might make this not a charge, though, is not only that he's probably within the pro half-circle, but also that it's a pretty close call as to whether the guy was planted before the last opportunity Anderson had to change directions. It's close.
emncaity 1 year ago
Point is, though, the guy was _trying_ to take a charge, which makes it not quite a "posterize."
emncaity 1 year ago
@emncaity - so when vince carter dunks over the head of a 7 foot ukrainian trying to take a charge....or tmac basically sits on bradley's shoulders dunking while bradly isn't trying to block him.....you wouldn't consider those "posterizations"?
the dude got slammed to the ground after the dunker's junk smacked him in the face. how is that not a poster?
tharpey 1 year ago
@tharpey - Exactly. Finally a voice of reason
DavidF330 1 year ago
I would not call them "posterizations," no. I would use the term to describe Carter dunking on a guy who's in position to stop him or to block the shot. He's certainly had more than his share of those, and it's no disrespect to call the one you describe an athletic, emphatic dunk that shows off leaping ability, rather than a "posterization." That's what I'd say about this one (in the vid).
emncaity 1 year ago
Comment removed
naahdarb 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@emncaity - You are stupid as hell... he posterized the shit out of that white boy.... You're an ignorant dumb ass if you can't realize that. Retard
naahdarb 1 year ago
Shut up. Why watch the clip to criticize? Can you do it? Good dunk Gerard!
natesmom0724 1 year ago
What do you think the comment lists are for, just for fanboys like you to fall at the guy's feet? You think nobody can comment unless they love it as much as you do?
It's a good dunk. It is not a great dunk.
emncaity 1 year ago
I agree it wasnt that 'awesome' of a play, but for someone who wasnt impressed by this clip, you sure are making alot of comments on it...
And that wasnt close to being a charge: not with the dude standing right in front of the rim. Good dunk, better no call.
gmoa87 1 year ago
? The only way people would make a lot of comments is if they were "impressed by the clip"? Fact is, I posted a couple of things early--I think one or two responses to existing posts, plus one of my own--and everything since then has been a response to people filling up my inbox with what a f#$ktard I am for not worshiping the guy or agreeing that it's a "posterizing."
I'm not so upset about the no-call here. I'd say it was _somewhat_ close to a charge, but not close enough.
emncaity 1 year ago
Here's what'd really be impressive: Guy gets good pass, in rhythm, dunks over stationary guy trying to take the charge, gets lucky not to have the charge called him, and DOESN'T stand there with the taunt like he did something. No coach should ever allow it. And don't even come in here with how they're "just competitive and showing their fire" crap. It ain't like Bill Russell et al. weren't "competitive."
emncaity 1 year ago
have you always been a scaredy cat?
guellion 1 year ago
Now what would make you say a stupid thing like that?
emncaity 1 year ago
I dont think it's a charge, b/c the defender was almost directly under the basket and there was no contact until after the ball was in the hoop. In any case though, I agree it's not a poster dunk at all...
Flash1175 1 year ago
His front foot is actually 2-3 feet in front of the front portion of the rim--but I agree, it's pretty close.
emncaity 1 year ago
Not that great, actually. The defender was doing what he was supposed to. Had charging been called, this clip wouldn't have been posted in the first place.
n7hmw 1 year ago
Charging is called in about 10% of the instances where it actually occurs. Guy has great leaping ability, but there's a difference between that and a "posterizing" dunk.
emncaity 1 year ago
charging. defender's feet were planted and he was straight up. plus it's a technical foul for taunting afterward.
jcoberly 1 year ago
Yup.
emncaity 1 year ago
Exactly what I thought after seeing that!
chitownref 1 year ago
in the words of Jim Ross "MAH GAWD!"
andresf2008 1 year ago
csun white boy just got " served" lol that was off the hook
SuperK9111 1 year ago
Yes, it matters so much that he was white. To you, I guess.
emncaity 1 year ago
so sick
bobaprince99 1 year ago
It's not getting posterized when you're just standing there trying to take a foul. That was essentially an uncontested dunk, so please, let's move on to the next dunk.
jaswan 2 years ago
@jaswan Amen. If the defender was jumping and trying to block it, that would be different, but this is a nice dunk, but not a poster shot at all.
marcomariaz26 1 year ago
No kidding. Same for the one he just had in the Big West tournament. Some of the fanboys here need to get a grip. You're not "posterizing" somebody when you come in, with momentum, and/or with numbers, and the defender's only trying to take the foul. Nice athletic ability, no doubt, but still. (In the other dunk, the defender was only 6'0".) You want to see posterized, try that world-famous one where Jordan goes off on Ewing, after reversing directions off the dribble on the baseline.
emncaity 1 year ago
oh my GOD. who is that dude?? that dude can dunk like mike!!!!
stickyickybee 2 years ago
Oh, huh-uh. That isn't dunking like Mike. Please.
I'll post a "dunk like Mike" in a sec.
emncaity 1 year ago
lolz chill out.
i know gerard...and it was a joke.
he's done even better dunks since then. like the latest from the csuf vs ucd game.
still an awesome dunk though!! =D
stickyickybee 1 year ago
sticky--
I'm gonna say good dunk with awesome leaping ability. "Great" dunk takes a great move to get there. Just a personal standard. (Cf. MJ over Ewing.)
emncaity 1 year ago
My condolences to the posterized guy's family, your son got murdered like very few
fedec51 2 years ago
OMG.. That's just UNBE-FUCKIN-LIVABLE!!
tonnazzo07 2 years ago
wow!
this guy is crazy, seems he has a sensational dunk every game
uncmann 2 years ago 3
oh my god
what an insane dunk
nice nice
thejames08 2 years ago